Search

Neurotrophic receptor kinase (NTRK) fusions are actionable oncogenic drivers of multiple pediatric and adult solid tumors, and tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) has been considered as an attractive therapeutic target for “pan-cancer” harboring these fusions. Currently, two generations TRK inhibitors have been developed. The representative second-generation inhibitors selitrectinib and repotrectinib were designed to overcome clinic acquired resistance of the first-generation inhibitors larotrectinib or entrectinib resulted from solvent-front and gatekeeper on-target mutations. However, xDFG (TRKAG667C/A/S, homologous TRKCG696C/A/S) and some double mutations still confer resistance to selitrectinib and repotrectinib, and overcoming these resistances represents a major unmet clinical need. In this review, we summarize the acquired resistance mechanism of the first- and second-generation TRK inhibitors, and firstly put forward the emerging selective type II TRK inhibitors to overcome xDFG mutations mediated resistance. Additionally, we concluded our perspectives on new challenges and future directions in this field.

Neurotrophic receptor kinase (NTRK) fusions are actionable oncogenic drivers of multiple pediatric and adult solid tumors, and tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) has been considered as an attractive therapeutic target for "pan-cancer" harboring these fusions. Currently, two generations TRK inhibitors have been developed. The representative second-generation inhibitors selitrectinib and repotrectinib were designed to overcome clinic acquired resistance of the first-generation inhibitors larotrectinib or entrectinib resulted from solvent-front and gatekeeper on-target mutations. However, xDFG (TRKAG667C/A/S, homologous TRKCG696C/A/S) and some double mutations still confer resistance to selitrectinib and repotrectinib, and overcoming these resistances represents a major unmet clinical need. In this review, we summarize the acquired resistance mechanism of the first- and second-generation TRK inhibitors, and firstly put forward the emerging selective type II TRK inhibitors to overcome xDFG mutations mediated resistance. Additionally, we concluded our perspectives on new challenges and future directions in this field. This review mainly summarizes the acquired resistance mechanisms of the first- and second-generation TRK inhibitors and firstly update the emerging selective type II TRK inhibitors to overcome the xDFG mutations mediated resistance. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Triple‐negative breast cancer (TNBC) is usually an aggressive disease with a poor prognosis and limited treatment options. The neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) gene fusions are cancer type‐agnostic emerging biomarkers approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), USA, for the selection of patients for targeted therapy. The main aim of our study was to investigate the frequency of NTRK aberrations, i.e. fusions, gene copy number gain, and amplification, in a series of TNBC using different methods. A total of 83 TNBCs were analyzed using pan‐TRK immunohistochemistry (IHC), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), real‐time polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR), and RNA‐based next‐generation sequencing (NGS). Of 83 cases, 16 showed pan‐TRK positivity although no cases had NTRK‐fusions. Indeed, FISH showed four cases carrying an atypical NTRK1 pattern consisting of one fusion signal and one/more single green signals, but all cases were negative for fusion by NGS and RT‐PCR testing. In addition, FISH analysis showed six cases with NTRK1 amplification, one case with NTRK2 copy number gain, and five cases with NTRK3 copy number gain, all negative for pan‐TRK IHC. Our data demonstrate that IHC has a high false‐positive rate for the detection of fusions and molecular testing is mandatory; there is no need to perform additional molecular tests in cases negativity for NTRK by IHC. In conclusion, the NTRK genes are not involved in fusions in TNBC, but both copy number gain and amplification are frequent events, suggesting a possible predictive role for other NTRK aberrations.

Triple‐negative breast cancer (TNBC) is usually an aggressive disease with a poor prognosis and limited treatment options. The neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) gene fusions are cancer type‐agnostic emerging biomarkers approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), USA, for the selection of patients for targeted therapy. The main aim of our study was to investigate the frequency of NTRK aberrations, i.e. fusions, gene copy number gain, and amplification, in a series of TNBC using different methods. A total of 83 TNBCs were analyzed using pan‐TRK immunohistochemistry (IHC), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), real‐time polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR), and RNA‐based next‐generation sequencing (NGS). Of 83 cases, 16 showed pan‐TRK positivity although no cases had NTRK‐fusions. Indeed, FISH showed four cases carrying an atypical NTRK1 pattern consisting of one fusion signal and one/more single green signals, but all cases were negative for fusion by NGS and RT‐PCR testing. In addition, FISH analysis showed six cases with NTRK1 amplification, one case with NTRK2 copy number gain, and five cases with NTRK3 copy number gain, all negative for pan‐TRK IHC. Our data demonstrate that IHC has a high false‐positive rate for the detection of fusions and molecular testing is mandatory; there is no need to perform additional molecular tests in cases negativity for NTRK by IHC. In conclusion, the NTRK genes are not involved in fusions in TNBC, but both copy number gain and amplification are frequent events, suggesting a possible predictive role for other NTRK aberrations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The aim of the study was to identify patients with NTRK fusion-positive or RET fusion/mutation-positive thyroid cancers, who could benefit from neurotrophic tyrosine kinase receptor (NTRK) or receptor tyrosine kinase (RET) inhibitors. Methods: Patients were identified in the Calgary prospective thyroid ca ncer database (N = 482). Patients were ‘pre-screened’ with clinically available MassARRAY® BRAF test, Colon Panel, Melanoma Panel, or ThyroSPEC™. Mutation-negative tumors were ‘screened’ for NTRK fusions and RET fusions/mutations with the Oncomine™ Comprehensive Assay v3 (OCAv3). Results: A total of 86 patients were included in 1 of 2 separate analyses. Analysis A included 42 patients with radioactive iodine (RAI)-resistant distant metastases. After pre-screening, 20 BRAF and RAS mutation-negative patients underwent OCAv3 screening, resulting in the detection of 4 patients with NTRK fusions and 4 patients with RET fusions (8/20, 40% of analyzed patients). Analysis B included 44 patients, 42 with American Thyroid Association (ATA) high and intermediate risk of recurrence and 2 with medullary thyroid carcinoma. During pre-screening, 1 patient with an NTRK fusion, 1 patient with a RET fusion, and 30 patients with BRAF mutations were identified. The remaining 9 patients received OCAv3 screening, resulting in detection of 1 patient with an NTRK fusion and 1 with a RET fusion (4/11, 36% of analyzed patients). Conclusions: Our findings indicate a higher rate of NTRK fusions and RET fusions in patients with thyroid cancer with RAI-resistant distant metastases and ATA high or intermediate risk of recurrence. This highlights the importance of early screening to enable intervention with a NTRK or RET inhibitor.

Tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitors have been approved for metastatic solid tumors harboring NTRK fusions, but the detection of NTRK fusions is challenging. International guidelines recommend pan-TRK immunohistochemistry (IHC) screening followed by next generation sequencing (NGS) in tumor types with low prevalence of NTRK fusions, including metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). RNA-based NGS is preferred, but is expensive, time-consuming, and extracting good-quality RNA from FFPE tissue is challenging. Alternatives in daily clinical practice are warranted. We assessed the diagnostic performance of RNA-NGS, FFPE-targeted locus capture (FFPE-TLC), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and the 5′/3′ imbalance quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) after IHC screening in 268 patients with microsatellite-instability-high mCRC, the subgroup in which NTRK fusions are most prevalent (1–5%). A consensus result was determined after review of all assay results. In 16 IHC positive tumors, 10 NTRK fusions were detected. In 33 IHC negative samples, no additional transcribed NTRK fusions were found, underscoring the high sensitivity of IHC. Sensitivity of RNA-NGS, FFPE-TLC, FISH, and qRT-PCR was 90%, 90%, 78%, and 100%, respectively. Specificity was 100% for all assays. Robustness, defined as the percentage of samples that provided an interpretable result in the first run, was 100% for FFPE-TLC, yet more limited for RNA-NGS (85%), FISH (70%), and qRT-PCR (70%). Overall, we do not recommend FISH for the detection of NTRK fusions in mCRC due to its low sensitivity and limited robustness. We conclude that RNA-NGS, FFPE-TLC, and qRT-PCR are appropriate assays for NTRK fusion detection, after enrichment with pan-TRK IHC, in routine clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BackgroundNTRK (neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase)-rearranged spindle cell neoplasms are a new group of tumors included in the new 5th edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of soft Tissue and Bone Sarcomas. These tumors are characterized by NTRK gene fusions and show a wide spectrum of histologies and clinical behavior. Several targeted therapies have recently been approved for tumors harboring NTRK fusions, including STS.Case PresentationA 26-year-old male with advanced, pretreated NTRK rearranged spindle cell neoplasm and liver, lung and bone metastases was treated with larotrectinib on a continuous 28-day schedule, at a dose of 100 mg twice daily. An 18FDG-PET/CT scan performed after 7 days of treatment showed tumor shrinkage in both visceral and bone lesions. There was no drug-related toxicity. Subsequent evaluations confirmed continued tumor regression in disease sites. The patient is well and continues treatment.ConclusionThe clinical and radiological response of our patient with an uncommon TPM4 (exon 7)-NTRK1 (exon 12) gene fusion tumor treated with a first-generation TRK inhibitor could contribute to a better understanding of the biology of this new STS entity and help to improve patient management.

Background: NTRK (neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase)-rearranged spindle cell neoplasms are a new group of tumors included in the new 5th edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of soft Tissue and Bone Sarcomas. These tumors are characterized by NTRK gene fusions and show a wide spectrum of histologies and clinical behavior. Several targeted therapies have recently been approved for tumors harboring NTRK fusions, including STS. Case Presentation: A 26-year-old male with advanced, pretreated NTRK rearranged spindle cell neoplasm and liver, lung and bone metastases was treated with larotrectinib on a continuous 28-day schedule, at a dose of 100 mg twice daily. An 18FDG-PET/CT scan performed after 7 days of treatment showed tumor shrinkage in both visceral and bone lesions. There was no drug-related toxicity. Subsequent evaluations confirmed continued tumor regression in disease sites. The patient is well and continues treatment. Conclusion: The clinical and radiological response of our patient with an uncommon TPM4 (exon 7)-NTRK1 (exon 12) gene fusion tumor treated with a first-generation TRK inhibitor could contribute to a better understanding of the biology of this new STS entity and help to improve patient management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• NTRK fusions are bona fide oncogenic lung cancer drivers. • NTRK fusions share a similar clinical profile with many other fusions. • Larotrectinib and entrectinib achieve high response rates and durable disease control. • Next-generation inhibitors have demonstrated clinical proof of principle responses. • Side effects of TRK inhibition include weight gain, dizziness, and paresthesias. Fusions involving TRK protein tyrosine kinases are oncogenic drivers in a variety of tumors in children and adults, with a prevalence of ∼0.2% in non-small cell lung cancer. Diagnosis can be challenging due to structural features such as NTRK intron length, but next-generation sequencing (NGS), including RNA-based NGS, increases detection. The first-generation TRK inhibitors, larotrectinib and entrectinib, have demonstrated clinically meaningful antitumor activity in TRK fusion-positive cancers in a tumor-agnostic fashion and should be considered first-line therapeutic options for TRK fusion-positive lung cancers. Furthermore, the first-generation TRK inhibitors are well tolerated. Care should be taken, however, to monitor on-target adverse events, such as dizziness, weight gain, paresthesias, and withdrawal pain. On-target and off-target mechanisms mediating TRK inhibitor resistance may occur. Next-generation TRK inhibitors, such as selitrectinib, repotrectinib, and taletrectinib, are available on ongoing clinical trials and address on-target resistance. This review will focus on NTRK fusions and TRK-directed targeted therapy specifically in the context of lung cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A Belgian ring trial for pan-TRK immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining was organised to harmonise pan-TRK IHC staining protocols and interpretation. As a reference method, the VENTANA pan-TRK Assay (clone EPR17341) on the Benchmark Ultra platform was selected. Six samples were selected: 2 negative, 2 fusion positive and 2 samples with wild-type endogenous TRK expression. Each participating laboratory stained the slides using their routine pan-TRK IHC and reported their results. In addition, they were asked to return one TRK-stained slide from each case. The coordinating lab evaluated these slides, compared them with the reference method and scored them. Two clones were used during the ring trial: A7H6R (Cell Signaling) and EPR17341 (Abcam/Ventana). Seven protocols achieved a sufficient performance mark, and three labs were advised to further optimise the protocol. Interpretation of pan-TRK IHC proved to be challenging in cases with physiological TRK expression. In addition, depending on the NTRK fusion partner, the staining can vary strongly in both intensity and staining pattern. Labs using the Ventana ready-to-use system based on the EPR17341 clone and using the recommended protocol settings scored best. However, given some small optimisation, all labs scored well on the technical staining and the succeeding evaluation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Updated analysis of entrectinib in patients with NTRK -fp NSCLC (data cutoff Aug 2022) • Patients with NTRK -fp NSCLC had deep and durable overall and intracranial responses. • Entrectinib had a manageable safety profile in patients with NTRK -fp NSCLC. • Data confirm that entrectinib is a relevant drug for patients with NTRK -fp NSCLC. • Data in NSCLC are consistent with those for the overall NTRK -fp study population. NTRK fusions result in constitutively active oncogenic TRK proteins responsible for ∼ 0.2 % of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases. Approximately 40 % of patients with advanced NSCLC develop CNS metastases; therefore, treatments with intracranial (IC) efficacy are needed. In an integrated analysis of three phase I/II studies (ALKA-372–001: EudraCT 2012–000148–88; STARTRK-1: NCT02097810; STARTRK-2: NCT02568267), entrectinib, a potent, CNS-active, TRK inhibitor, demonstrated efficacy in patients with NTRK fusion-positive (fp) NSCLC (objective response rate [ORR]: 64.5 %; 2 August 2021 data cut-off). We present updated data for this cohort. Eligible patients were ≥ 18 years with locally advanced/metastatic, NTRK -fp NSCLC with ≥ 12 months of follow-up. Tumor responses were assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR) per RECIST v1.1 at Week 4 and every eight weeks thereafter. Co-primary endpoints: ORR; duration of response (DoR). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS); overall survival (OS); IC efficacy; safety. Enrolment cut-off: 2 July 2021; data cut-off: 2 August 2022. The efficacy-evaluable population included 51 patients with NTRK -fp NSCLC. Median age was 60.0 years (range 22–88); 20 patients (39.2 %) had investigator-assessed baseline CNS metastases. Median survival follow–up was 26.3 months (95 % CI 21.0–34.1). ORR was 62.7 % (95 % CI 48.1–75.9), with six complete and 26 partial responses. Median DoR and PFS were 27.3 months (95 % CI 19.9–30.9) and 28.0 months (95 % CI 15.7–30.4), respectively. Median OS was 41.5 months. In patients with BICR-assessed baseline CNS metastases, IC-ORR was 64.3 % (n = 9/14; 95 % CI 35.1–87.2), including seven complete responders, and IC-DoR was 55.7 months. In the safety–evaluable population (n = 55), most treatment-related adverse events were grade 1/2; no treatment-related deaths were reported. Entrectinib has continued to demonstrate deep and durable systemic and IC responses in patients with NTRK -fp NSCLC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Due to the efficacy of tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitor therapy and the recent Food and Drug Administration approval of larotrectinib, it is now clinically important to accurately and efficiently identify patients with neurotrophic TRK (NTRK) fusion-driven cancer. These oncogenic fusions occur when the kinase domain of NTRK1 , NTRK2 or NTRK3 fuse with any of a number of N-terminal partners. NTRK fusions are characteristic of a few rare types of cancer, such as secretory carcinoma of the breast or salivary gland and infantile fibrosarcoma, but they are also infrequently seen in some common cancers, such as melanoma, glioma and carcinomas of the thyroid, lung and colon. There are multiple methods for identifying NTRK fusions, including pan-TRK immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in situ hybridisation and sequencing methods, and the advantages and drawbacks of each are reviewed here. While testing algorithms will obviously depend on availability of various testing modalities and economic considerations for each individual laboratory, we propose triaging specimens based on histology and other molecular findings to most efficiently identify tumours harbouring these treatable oncogenic fusions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Gangliogliomas are rare neoplasms of the central nervous system that mostly originate in the temporal lobe and are associated with seizures. Literature mentions that BRAF mutations are most commonly associated with gangliogliomas. We discuss a unique case of ganglioglioma originating in the posterior fossa that showed multiple losses and a unique interstitial deletion at 9q21 by an array‐comparative genome hybridization (array‐CGH). The deletion led to a novel molecular fusion (TLE4‐NTRK2) which was confirmed by next generation sequencing and provides a potential for a gene‐targeted therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: The use of novel therapeutic drugs in lung cancer has changed the paradigm of the diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer. Due to the development of advanced diagnostic procedures (e.g., next generation sequencing (NGS)) around half of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients can be identified with genetic aberrations. The presence of activating mutations of EGFR, ALK and ROS-1 have already been well explored. New targets that can be successfully targeted include NTRK, MET, RET and HER 2 genes. Some particles have already received FDA approval, whereas many more are in the late stages of clinical trials. Considering rapid changes in thoracic oncology, an up-to-date summary is needed. In this review, we present the current landscape of approved therapeutic drugs, as well as important ongoing clinical trials. Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer-related death worldwide, and the prognosis for stage IV remains poor. The presence of genetic alterations in tumor cells, such as EGFR and BRAF gene mutations, as well as ALK and ROS1 gene rearrangements, are indications for targeted therapies. Many such treatments are already registered and used on a wide scale. In comparison to standard chemotherapy, they can prolong not only progression-free survival but also overall survival. Moreover, they are able to provide excellent quality of life and rapid improvement of cancer-related symptoms such as dyspnea, cough and pain. Recent years have witnessed great advances in both molecular diagnostics and new molecular therapies for non-small-cell lung cancer. This review presents new therapeutic targets in NSCLC, as well as drugs of which the activity against NTRK, RET, MET or HER2 gene alterations (including EGFR exon 20 insertions) has either been confirmed or is currently being evaluated. Although these particular genetic alterations in NSCLC are generally rare, each accounting for 1–2% of patients, in total about half of all patients have molecular alterations and may ultimately receive targeted therapies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinases (NTRK) play an important role in the development and function of the nervous system. Fusions involving NTRK and a wide range of genes that act as fusion partners are oncogenic and activate well-known signal transduction pathways like the MAPK-ERK pathway. NTRK fusions occur in many very different tumor entities in children and youth as well as in adults. There are a few tumors like secretory breast cancer and congenital fibrosarcoma for which NTRK fusions are pathognomonic. At the same time there a large number of tumors in which NTRK fusions occur in very rare frequency (e.g., lung cancer). TRK inhibitors offer now the possibility to use NTRK fusion as antitumorigenic targets in a tumor agnostic fashion regardless of the basic histology. It is the task of modern pathology to identify such targetable fusions in a highly effective and efficient manner. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]