3 results on '"Theelen, W.S.M.E."'
Search Results
2. SAPPHIRE: phase III study of sitravatinib plus nivolumab versus docetaxel in advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer.
- Author
-
Borghaei, H., de Marinis, F., Dumoulin, D., Reynolds, C., Theelen, W.S.M.E., Percent, I., Gutierrez Calderon, V., Johnson, M.L., Madroszyk-Flandin, A., Garon, E.B., He, K., Planchard, D., Reck, M., Popat, S., Herbst, R.S., Leal, T.A., Shazer, R.L., Yan, X., Harrigan, R., and Peters, S.
- Subjects
- *
NON-small-cell lung carcinoma , *DOCETAXEL , *NIVOLUMAB , *CLINICAL trials , *ADVERSE health care events - Abstract
Checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) therapy revolutionized treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, most patients progress due to primary or acquired resistance. Sitravatinib is a receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor that can shift the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment toward an immunostimulatory state. Combining sitravatinib with nivolumab (sitra + nivo) may potentially overcome initial CPI resistance. In the phase III SAPPHIRE study, patients with advanced non-oncogenic driven, nonsquamous NSCLC who initially benefited from (≥4 months on CPI without progression) and subsequently experienced disease progression on or after CPI combined with or following platinum-based chemotherapy were randomized 1 : 1 to sitra (100 mg once daily administered orally) + nivo (240 mg every 2 weeks or 480 mg every 4 weeks administered intravenously) or docetaxel (75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks administered intravenously). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), duration of response (DOR; all assessed by blinded independent central review), and safety. A total of 577 patients included randomized: sitra + nivo, n = 284; docetaxel, n = 293 (median follow-up, 17.1 months). Sitra + nivo did not significantly improve OS versus docetaxel [median, 12.2 versus 10.6 months; hazard ratio (HR) 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70-1.05; P = 0.144]. The median PFS was 4.4 versus 5.4 months, respectively (HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.89-1.32; P = 0.452). The ORR was 15.6% for sitra + nivo and 17.2% for docetaxel (P = 0.597); CBR was 75.5% and 64.5%, respectively (P = 0.004); median DOR was 7.4 versus 7.1 months, respectively (P = 0.924). Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events were observed in 53.0% versus 66.7% of patients receiving sitra + nivo versus docetaxel, respectively. Although median OS was numerically longer with sitra + nivo, the primary endpoint was not met in patients with previously treated advanced nonsquamous NSCLC. The safety profiles demonstrated were consistent with previous reports. • Phase III trial of sitra + nivo compared with docetaxel in patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC. • The study evaluated whether CPI resistance can be overcome in patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy and CPI. • The primary endpoint of improved OS with sitra + nivo versus docetaxel was not met. • The safety profiles of both regimens were consistent with previous reports, with no new safety signals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Osimertinib versus platinum–pemetrexed for patients with EGFR T790M advanced NSCLC and progression on a prior EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor: AURA3 overall survival analysis.
- Author
-
Papadimitrakopoulou, V.A., Mok, T.S., Han, J.-Y., Ahn, M.-J., Delmonte, A., Ramalingam, S.S., Kim, S.W., Shepherd, F.A., Laskin, J., He, Y., Akamatsu, H., Theelen, W.S.M.E., Su, W.-C., John, T., Sebastian, M., Mann, H., Miranda, M., Laus, G., Rukazenkov, Y., and Wu, Y.-L.
- Subjects
- *
EPIDERMAL growth factor receptors , *PROTEIN-tyrosine kinase inhibitors , *NON-small-cell lung carcinoma , *CANCER patients , *CANCER treatment - Abstract
In AURA3 (NCT02151981), osimertinib, a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), significantly prolonged progression-free survival and improved response in patients with EGFR T790M advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and progression on prior EGFR-TKI treatment. We report the final AURA3 overall survival (OS) analysis. Adult patients were randomized 2 : 1 to osimertinib (80 mg orally, once daily) or pemetrexed plus carboplatin/cisplatin (platinum–pemetrexed) intravenously, every 3 weeks (≤6 cycles). Patients could crossover to osimertinib on progression confirmed by blinded independent central review. OS and safety were secondary end points. A total of 279 patients were randomly assigned to receive osimertinib and 140 to platinum–pemetrexed (136 received treatment). At data cut-off (DCO; 15 March 2019), 188 patients (67%) receiving osimertinib versus 93 (66%) receiving platinum–pemetrexed had died. The hazard ratio (HR) for OS was 0.87 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67–1.12; P = 0.277]; the median OS was 26.8 months (95% CI 23.5–31.5) versus 22.5 months (95% CI 20.2–28.8) for osimertinib and platinum–pemetrexed, respectively. The estimated 24- and 36-month survival was 55% versus 43% and 37% versus 30%, respectively. After crossover adjustment, there was an HR of 0.54 (95% CI 0.18–1.6). Time to first subsequent therapy or death showed a clinically meaningful advantage toward osimertinib (HR 0.21, 95% CI 0.16–0.28; P < 0.001). At DCO, 99/136 (73%) patients in the platinum–pemetrexed arm had crossed over to osimertinib, 66/99 (67%) of whom had died. The most common adverse events possibly related to study treatment were diarrhea (32%; grade ≥3, 1%) and rash (grouped term; 32%; grade ≥3, <1%) in the osimertinib arm, versus nausea (47%; grade ≥3, 3%) in the platinum–pemetrexed arm. In patients with T790M advanced NSCLC, no statistically significant benefit in OS was observed for osimertinib versus platinum–pemetrexed, which possibly reflects the high crossover rate of patients from platinum–pemetrexed to osimertinib. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02151981 ; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02151981. • Median OS with osimertinib was 26.8 months versus 22.5 months with platinum–pemetrexed (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.67–1.12; P = 0.277). • The lack of a significant survival benefit could reflect high percentage (73%) of platinum–pemetrexed to osimertinib crossover. • Analysis of OS adjusted for crossover showed an HR of 0.54 (95% CI 0.18–1.60). • Among patients receiving subsequent anticancer therapy, platinum chemotherapy was the most common after osimertinib (65%). • Grade ≥3 (possibly treatment-related) adverse events were observed less frequently with osimertinib (9% versus 34% with platinum–pemetrexed). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.