Search

Abstract Structural chromosomal rearrangements result from different mechanisms of formation, usually related to certain genomic architectural features that may lead to genetic instability. Most of these rearrangements arise from recombination, repair, or replication mechanisms that occur after a double-strand break or the stalling/breakage of a replication fork. Here, we review the mechanisms of formation of structural rearrangements, highlighting their main features and differences. The most important mechanisms of constitutional chromosomal alterations are discussed, including Non-Allelic Homologous Recombination (NAHR), Non-Homologous End-Joining (NHEJ), Fork Stalling and Template Switching (FoSTeS), and Microhomology-Mediated Break-Induced Replication (MMBIR). Their involvement in chromoanagenesis and in the formation of complex chromosomal rearrangements, inverted duplications associated with terminal deletions, and ring chromosomes is also outlined. We reinforce the importance of high-resolution analysis to determine the DNA sequence at, and near, their breakpoints in order to infer the mechanisms of formation of structural rearrangements and to reveal how cells respond to DNA damage and repair broken ends.

Structural chromosomal rearrangements result from different mechanisms of formation, usually related to certain genomic architectural features that may lead to genetic instability. Most of these rearrangements arise from recombination, repair, or replication mechanisms that occur after a double-strand break or the stalling/breakage of a replication fork. Here, we review the mechanisms of formation of structural rearrangements, highlighting their main features and differences. The most important mechanisms of constitutional chromosomal alterations are discussed, including Non-Allelic Homologous Recombination (NAHR), Non-Homologous End-Joining (NHEJ), Fork Stalling and Template Switching (FoSTeS), and Microhomology-Mediated Break-Induced Replication (MMBIR). Their involvement in chromoanagenesis and in the formation of complex chromosomal rearrangements, inverted duplications associated with terminal deletions, and ring chromosomes is also outlined. We reinforce the importance of high-resolution analysis to determine the DNA sequence at, and near, their breakpoints in order to infer the mechanisms of formation of structural rearrangements and to reveal how cells respond to DNA damage and repair broken ends. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: We report on a boy with speech delay, mental retardation, motor clumsiness, hyperactivity, dysmorphic facial features, brachytelephalangy and short stature. Electrocardiogram, echocardiography, renal ultrasound, electroencephalogram, fundoscopic exam and auditory brainstem responses were all normal. Brain magnetic resonance imaging showed a left temporal arachnoid cyst and a small pineal gland cyst. High resolution karyotype and FISH analysis detected a de novo duplication of the short arm of chromosome 20. A molecular characterization of the chromosomal anomaly was performed by array-CGH, confirming a 17.98Mb duplication of the short arm of chromosome 20 associated with a small duplication on chromosome 3p, that was shown to be maternally inherited. This is one of the few cases of de novo trisomy 20p with extensive workup, characterization at molecular level and close follow-up from the neonatal period to age 30months. We also compared the phenotype of our patient with that previously reported in literature, therefore contributing to better define the trisomy 20p syndrome and helping pediatricians and geneticists to better counsel families about the developmental prognosis of these children. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Highlights: [•] Copy number variations (CNVs) are quantitative genome divergences like duplications and deletions. [•] Rare cancer CNVs affect genes associated with hereditary cancer syndromes. [•] CNV de novo mutations appear orders of magnitude more frequently than point mutations. [•] Somatic copy number aberrations (CNAs) reflect genomic instabilities acquired during tumorigenesis. [•] CNAs are generated by error-prone DNA double-strand break repair activities, which represent a potential breast cancer risk marker. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]