1. Using Nix color sensor and Munsell soil color variables to classify contrasting soil types and predict soil organic carbon in Eastern India.
- Author
-
Swetha, R.K., Dasgupta, Subhadip, Chakraborty, Somsubhra, Li, Bin, Weindorf, David C., Mancini, Marcelo, Silva, Sérgio Henrique Godinho, Ribeiro, Bruno Teixeira, Curi, Nilton, and Ray, Deb Prasad
- Subjects
- *
SOIL color , *SOIL classification , *RED soils , *CARBON in soils , *PRINCIPAL components analysis , *SOIL moisture , *INCEPTISOLS - Abstract
• Soils from three agro-climatic zones were classified using MSCC and Nix. • Soil OC was predicted using MSCC and Nix in different combinations. • Both non– standardized and MSCC-standardized Nix values were used. • Results indicated the reproducibility and potential accuracy of the Nix sensor. • Nix + MSCC produced satisfactory surface OC prediction. Optimal soil management depends on rapid and frequent monitoring of key soil properties, which are conventionally measured in the laboratory using laborious wet-chemistry protocols. The Nix color sensor has recently exhibited promise for predicting several soil properties using soil color. This study evaluated the relationship between the Munsell Soil Color Chart (MSCC) color values of dry and ground surface soil samples to those reported by the Nix color sensor with (Nix STD) and without MSCC standardization (Nix NON-STD) to classify 371 samples collected from three contrasting soil types, collected from three agro-climatic zones (coastal saline zone, red and laterite zone, and Gangetic alluvial zone) and to predict soil organic carbon (OC) using different multivariate data mining algorithms. Comparing the CIEL*a*b* color values reported by the MSCC and the Nix STD , an acceptable mean color difference (ΔE* ab) value of 5.20 was obtained, indicating the potential accuracy of the Nix sensor. Principal component analysis efficiently clustered the soil types using the RGB variables extracted from the MSCC color chips in tandem with the Nix STD /Nix NON-STD data. Both classification tree and linear support vector machine algorithms perfectly classified all three contrasting soil types using Nix NON-STD data alone. Besides, the combination of the MSCC and the Nix NON-STD datasets produced the best OC prediction (R2 = 0.66) via random forest (RF) algorithm and indicated the potential of Nix in digital soil morphometrics. In most of the RF models, redness (a*), yellowness (b*), and yellow (Y) variables appeared influential, presumably because of their negative correlation with OC in red and laterite soils. More research is warranted to measure the impacts of variable soil moisture and other confounding soil morphological features on the soil classification and OC prediction performance to extend the approach for classifying soil types and predicting OC in-situ. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF