Search

Background/aim: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of nivolumab plus ipilimumab for untreated metastatic renal cell carcinoma in real-world clinical practice in Japan based on 1-year follow-up results., Patients and Methods: This multicentre, retrospective study analysed 45 metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients who received nivolumab plus ipilimumab between August 2018 and January 2019 in Japan. Data were extracted from patients' medical records. Subgroup analyses were performed based on baseline demographic data and treatment history., Results: The objective response rate was 42.5% (complete response rate: 10.0%). The 12-month overall survival rate was 81.4% and the progression-free survival rate was 56.1%. Thirty-five patients (77.8%) showed any grade treatment-related adverse events and 17 (37.8%) showed grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events, with no significant difference in safety between subgroups., Conclusion: The effectiveness and safety of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in real-world clinical practice with 1-year follow-up were comparable with those of the CheckMate 214 trial., (Copyright © 2021 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Background: Nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO+IPI) demonstrated superior efficacy over sunitinib (SUN) for previously untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) in CheckMate 214, with a manageable safety profile. We report efficacy and safety with extended follow-up amongst Japanese patients., Methods: CheckMate 214 patients received NIVO (3 mg/kg) plus IPI (1 mg/kg) every 3 weeks for four doses, then NIVO (3 mg/kg) every 2 weeks; or SUN (50 mg) once daily for 4 weeks (6-week cycle). This subgroup analysis assessed overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) per investigator in International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) intermediate/poor-risk and intent-to-treat (ITT) patients and safety (ITT patients)., Results: Of 550 and 546 patients randomized to NIVO+IPI and SUN, 38 and 34, respectively, were Japanese. Of these, 31 (NIVO+IPI) and 29 (SUN) patients were IMDC intermediate/poor-risk. In IMDC intermediate/poor-risk patients with 30 months' minimum follow-up, there was a delayed trend in OS benefit with NIVO+IPI (hazard ratio [HR] 0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.19-1.59; P = 0.2670), and 24-month OS probability favoured NIVO+IPI (84%) versus SUN (76%). The ORR was 39% with NIVO+IPI and 31% with SUN (P = 0.6968). PFS was similar in both treatment arms (HR 1.17; 95% CI: 0.62-2.20; P = 0.6220). Efficacy in ITT patients was similar to IMDC intermediate/poor-risk patients. Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse event incidence was lower with NIVO+IPI versus SUN (58 versus 91%)., Conclusions: Japanese patients with untreated aRCC in the NIVO+IPI arm had a numerically higher ORR and improved safety profile versus patients in the SUN arm. A delayed OS benefit appears to be emerging with NIVO+IPI. Longer follow-up is needed. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02231749?term=NCT02231749&rank=1 identifier: NCT02231749., (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Nivolumab has demonstrated antitumor activity and manageable safety in the single-arm, phase II CheckMate 275 study in patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic platinum-resistant urothelial carcinoma. We report updated results of the global population and a subanalysis of Japanese patients from this study., Methods: Patients received nivolumab 3 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) confirmed by blinded independent review committee (BIRC) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) by BIRC and overall survival (OS). Safety was also reported. The minimum follow-up was 21 months., Results: Overall, 270 patients were treated with nivolumab globally; 23 patients were Japanese. In the global and Japanese populations, respectively, ORR per BIRC was 20.4% and 21.7%; median PFS was 1.9 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9-2.3) and 3.8 months (95% CI 1.9-7.2); and median OS was 8.6 (95% CI 6.1-11.3) and 21.0 months (95% CI 7.2-not reached). The most common any grade treatment-related adverse events were fatigue (18.1%) and diarrhea (12.2%) in the global population; the most common in the Japanese population were diarrhea (26.1%) and pyrexia (13.0%). Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 61 (22.6%) and seven (30.4%) of the global and Japanese patients, respectively., Conclusions: Nivolumab continues to show antitumor activity and survival in the global population of CheckMate 275. Meaningful clinical benefit was also observed in Japanese patients. No new safety signals were identified.

Here, we report a case of a 68-year-old woman with cT4N0M1 (liver invasion and multiple lung metastases) metastatic renal cell carcinoma. We could carry out less invasive nephrectomy with partial hepatectomy because nivolumab administration as second-line therapy reduced the primary tumor remarkably. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of the use of nivolumab before carrying out surgery, and histological findings showed a pathological complete response., (© 2018 The Japanese Urological Association.)

Objectives: To investigate the efficacy of pharmacotherapy for metastatic non‐clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) in Japanese population. Methods: In this retrospective analysis, we compared the time to treatment failure (TTF) for molecular‐targeted agents as first‐line therapy, or nivolumab therapy as sequential therapy between ccRCC and nccRCC using the data of Japanese metastatic RCC patients registered in the Michinoku Japan Urological Cancer Study Group database. Results: In total, 511 cases of ccRCC and 77 cases of nccRCC were treated with pharmacotherapy. After excluding the patients who received cytokine therapy, chemotherapy, or others, there were 391 ccRCC patients and 60 nccRCC patients who were treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), and 7 ccRCC patients and 7 nccRCC patients who were treated with mammalian‐target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTORIs). In addition, 132 ccRCC patients and 16 nccRCC patients received nivolumab. There was no significant difference in IMDC risk classification before first‐line therapy between ccRCC and nccRCC groups, or in each subgroup within the nccRCC group. TTF for TKIs (161 days, 95% CI: 75‐212 days) and mTORIs (21 days, 95% CI: 9‐31 days) didn't differ significantly between nccRCC and ccRCC groups (205 days, 95% CI: 174‐243 days and 33 days, 95% CI: 8‐113 days, respectively). TTF for TKIs was significantly longer than that for mTORIs in nccRCC group (p<0.01). There was no significant difference in TTF between the different TKIs in nccRCC group. In addition, no significant difference in TTF for nivolumab was seen between ccRCC and nccRCC groups. Conclusions: The results showed that the efficacy of molecular‐targeted agents as first‐line therapy was similar oncological outcomes between metastatic nccRCC and ccRCC in Japanese patients. TKIs may be more effective than mTORIs in metastatic nccRCC patients. Nivolumab administration might also be as effective in nccRCC patients as in ccRCC patients in Japanese population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This study is part of the SNPs in Nivolumab PD‐1 inhibitor for RCC (SNiP‐RCC). Here we aimed to reveal clinical factors for tumor response, progression, and survival in nivolumab for advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in Japanese patients. Methods: We included patients from 23 institutions in Japan. We evaluated the objective response, radiographic progression‐free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment‐related grade ≥ 3 (serious adverse events [SAEs]). Results: We included 222 patients. The median age was 69 years (interquartile range 62–74 years), and 71% of the patients were male. Pancreas metastasis, lung metastases, prior cytokine therapy, and SAEs, were associated with objective response. The median PFS was 18 months. Liver metastases (hazard ratio [HR], 1.61), age ≥ 75 (HR, 0.48), previous resection of primary sites (HR, 0.47), and SAEs (HR, 0.47) were independent prognostic factors for PFS. Karnofsky Performance Status <70 (HR, 2.90), high platelets (HR, 4.48), previous resection of primary sites (HR, 0.23), and pathological grade (HR, 0.19 for grade 2 and HR, 0.12 for grade 3) were independent prognostic factors for OS. SAEs were reported in 45 (20.3%) cases. In the group of patients with prior nephrectomy, SAEs were associated with objective response, PFS, and OS. Conclusion: The SNiP‐RCC study identified clinical parameters correlated with treatment outcomes in Japanese patients with priorly treated advanced clear cell RCC undergoing nivolumab monotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although combination immune checkpoint inhibitor (immuno‐oncology [IO]) therapy is the first‐line treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), it mostly causes resistance and tumor regrowth. Therefore, an optimal second‐line therapy is necessary. Such therapy typically comprises vascular endothelial growth factor receptor‐tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR‐TKIs). This study was aimed at comparing the efficacy of two TKIs—axitinib and sunitinib—in mRCC patients. From January 2008 to October 2018, we registered 703 mRCC patients from 8 Japanese institutes. Of these, 408 patients received axitinib or sunitinib as the first‐line treatment. Thereafter, efficacy and survival rate were compared between the axitinib and sunitinib groups. To reduce the effects of selection bias and potential confounders, propensity score matching analysis was performed. Axitinib and sunitinib were administered in 274 and 134 patients, respectively. More than 25% of the patients received nivolumab sequence therapy. To calculate the propensity scores for each patient, we performed multivariate logistic regression analysis. The objective response rate, progression‐free survival (PFS), cause‐specific survival, and overall survival (OS) were significantly better in the axitinib group than in the sunitinib group. Furthermore, the OS was better in the nivolumab‐treated patients in the axitinib group. Axitinib showed higher efficacy and afforded greater survival benefits than did sunitinib when administered as first‐line therapy in mRCC patients. Thus, from among VEGFR‐TKIs, axitinib might be a possible option for application in the middle of IO drug‐based treatment sequences. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Response patterns to nivolumab–ipilimumab therapy in advanced renal cell carcinoma. • Lung metastasis exhibited early response to the combination therapy. • Lung metastasis related positively to progression-free survival and overall response. This study aimed to identify patterns of early response to nivolumab and ipilimumab combination therapy (Nivo+Ipi) in primary and metastatic sites of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). RCC patients treated with Nivo+Ipi or tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) as first-line therapy were included. To exclude selection bias due to patient characteristics, baseline clinical data was adjusted by inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Overall response rate (ORR) and lesional response rates (LRR) in primary and metastatic sites were determined by measuring tumor diameters on serial CT images according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1. 33 patients were treated with Nivo+Ipi and 39 with TKIs as first-line therapy. After IPTW-adjusted analysis, ORR during the first 24 weeks of treatment was significantly higher in Nivo+Ipi group than in TKIs group (45.5% versus 21.7%, p < 0.01). LRR of the primary tumor tended to be higher in Nivo+Ipi group than in TKI group (14.8% versus 4.4%, p = 0.06). Mean LRR of all metastatic sites was not significantly different between the two groups, but tumor shrinkage rate of lung metastasis was significantly higher in Nivo+Ipi group than in TKIs group (68.5% versus −12.7%, p < 0.01). Univariate and multivariate analyses identified lung metastasis as the independent factor associated with prolonged progression-free survival and with higher ORR. Our study found that lung metastasis of advanced RCC exhibited early response to Nivo+Ipi therapy. Further studies are warranted to verify whether site-specific early response predicts overall survival benefit in advanced RCC patients treated with Nivo+Ipi. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]