1. Extending the dosing intervals of nivolumab: model-based simulations in unselected cancer patients.
- Author
-
Puszkiel A, Bianconi G, Pasquiers B, Balakirouchenane D, Arrondeau J, Boudou-Rouquette P, Bretagne MC, Salem JE, Declèves X, Vidal M, Kramkimel N, Guegan S, Aractingi S, Huillard O, Alexandre J, Wislez M, Goldwasser F, and Blanchet B
- Subjects
- Humans, Female, Male, Aged, Middle Aged, Computer Simulation, Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological administration & dosage, Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological pharmacokinetics, Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors administration & dosage, Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors pharmacokinetics, Models, Biological, Nivolumab administration & dosage, Nivolumab pharmacokinetics, Neoplasms drug therapy, Neoplasms pathology, Drug Administration Schedule
- Abstract
Background: Reducing nivolumab dose intensity could increase patients' life quality and decrease the financial burden while maintaining efficacy. The aims of this study were to develop a population PK model of nivolumab based on data from unselected metastatic cancer patients and to simulate extended-interval regimens allowing to maintain minimal effective plasma concentrations (MEPC)., Methods: Concentration-time data (992 plasma nivolumab concentrations, 364 patients) were modeled using a two-compartment model with linear elimination clearance in Monolix software. Extended-interval regimens allowing to maintain steady-state trough concentrations (C
min,ss ) above the MEPC of 2.5 mg/L or 1.5 mg/L in >90% of patients were simulated., Results: Increasing 3-times the dosing interval from 240 mg every two weeks (Q2W) to Q6W and 2-times from 480 mg Q4W to Q8W resulted in Cmin,ss above 2.5 mg/L in 95.8% and 95.4% of patients, respectively. 240 mg Q8W and 480 mg Q10W resulted in Cmin,ss above 1.5 mg/L in 91.0% and 91.8% of patients, respectively. Selection of a 240 mg Q6W regimen would decrease by 3-fold the annual treatment costs compared to standard regimen of 240 mg Q2W (from 78,744€ to 26,248€ in France)., Conclusions: Clinical trials are warranted to confirm the non-inferiority of extended-interval compared to standard regimen., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF