Search

A collection of 33 Saccharomyces yeasts were used for wine fermentation with a sole nitrogen source: ammonium and four individual aroma-inducing amino acids. The fermentation performance and chemical wine composition were evaluated. The most valuable nitrogen sources were valine as a fermentation promoter on non-cerevisiae strains, phenylalanine as fruity aromas enhancer whereas the ethanol yield was lessened by leucine and isoleucine. S. cerevisiae SC03 and S. kudriavzevii SK02 strains showed to be the greatest producers of fruity ethyl esters while S. kudriavzevii strains SK06 and SK07 by shortening the fermentation duration. S. uvarum strains produced the greatest succinic acid amounts and, together with S. eubayanus, they reached the highest production of 2-phenylethanol and its acetate ester; whereas S. kudriavzevii strains were found to be positively related to high glycerol production., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Nitrogen requirements by S. cerevisiae during wine fermentation are highly strain-dependent. Different approaches were applied to explore the nitrogen requirements of 28 wine yeast strains. Based on the growth and fermentation behaviour displayed at different nitrogen concentrations, high and low nitrogen-demanding strains were selected and further verified by competition fermentation. Biomass production with increasing nitrogen concentrations in the exponential fermentation phase was analysed by chemostat cultures. Low nitrogen-demanding (LND) strains produced a larger amount of biomass in nitrogen-limited synthetic grape musts, whereas high nitrogen-demanding (HND) strains achieved a bigger biomass yield when the YAN concentration was above 100 mg/L. Constant rate fermentation was carried out with both strains to determine the amount of nitrogen required to maintain the highest fermentation rate. Large differences appeared in the analysis of the genomes of low and high-nitrogen demanding strains showed for heterozygosity and the amino acid substitutions between orthologous proteins, with nitrogen recycling system genes showing the widest amino acid divergences. The CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome modification method was used to validate the involvement of GCN1 in the yeast strain nitrogen needs. However, the allele swapping of gene GCN1 from low nitrogen-demanding strains to high nitrogen-demanding strains did not significantly influence the fermentation rate., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Wine-related non-Saccharomyces yeasts are becoming more widely used in oenological practice for their ability to confer wine a more complex satisfying aroma, but their metabolism remains unknown. Our study explored the nitrogen utilisation profile of three popular non-Saccharomyces species, Torulaspora delbrueckii, Metschnikowia pulcherrima and Metschnikowia fructicola. The nitrogen source preferences to support growth and fermentation as well as the uptake order of different nitrogen sources during wine fermentation were investigated. While T. delbrueckii and S. cerevisiae strains shared the same nitrogen source preferences, Metschnikowia sp. Displayed a lower capacity to efficiently use the preferred nitrogen compounds, but were able to assimilate a wider range of amino acids. During alcoholic fermentation, the non-Saccharomyces strains consumed different nitrogen sources in a similar order as S. cerevisiae, but not as quickly. Furthermore, when all the nitrogen sources were supplied in the same amount, their assimilation order was similarly affected for both S. cerevisiae and non-Saccharomyces strains. Under this condition, the rate of nitrogen source consumption of non-Saccharomyces strains and S. cerevisiae was comparable. Overall, this study expands our understanding about the preferences and consumption rates of individual nitrogen sources by the investigated non-Saccharomyces yeasts in a wine environment. This knowledge provides useful information for a more efficient exploitation of non-Saccharomyces strains that improves the management of the wine fermentation., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)