Search

Background: Native and oxidized LDLs (n-LDL and ox-LDL) are involved in the atherogenic process and affect endothelium-dependent vascular tone through their interaction with nitric oxide (NO)., Methods and Results: In this study we evaluated directly, by using a porphyrinic microsensor, the effect of increasing lipoprotein concentrations on endothelial NO and superoxide (O(2)(-)) production. We investigated where lipoproteins may affect the L-arginine-NO pathway by pretreating cells with L-arginine, L-N-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME), and superoxide dismutase. Bovine aortic endothelial cells were exposed for 1 hour to increasing concentrations of n-LDL (from 0 to 240 mg cholesterol/dL) and ox-LDL (from 0 to 140 mg cholesterol/dL). A stimulated (calcium ionophore) NO concentration decreased to 29% of the control at n-LDL concentration of 80 mg cholesterol/dL and to 15% of the control at 20 mg cholesterol/dL of ox-LDL. L-Arginine partially neutralized the inhibitory effect of n-LDL and ox-LDL on the NO generation. Superoxide dismutase pretreatment did not modify NO production, whereas L-NAME blunted NO generation at all LDL concentrations. O(2)(-) production was increased at low n-LDL and very low ox-LDL concentrations; this was reversed by L-arginine., Conclusions: These findings confirm the inhibitory role of n-LDL and ox-LDL on NO generation and suggest that lipoproteins may induce a decreased uptake of L-arginine. The local depletion of the L-arginine substrate may derange the NO synthase, leading to overproduction of O(2)(-) from oxygen, the other substrate of NO synthase.

Indirect evidence using nitric oxide (NO) synthase (NOS) inhibitors suggests that in guinea-pig airways bradykinin releases bronchoprotective NO. In this study, using a recently developed electrochemical method of NO measurement based on a porphyrinic microsensor, we investigated whether bradykinin releases NO from guinea-pig airways and whether the epithelium is the main source of NO. Further, the Ca(2+)-dependence of bradykinin-induced NO release was assessed stimulating airway preparations with bradykinin in Ca(2+)-free conditions. We also studied the immunohistochemical distribution of the Ca(2+)- dependent constitutive isoforms of NOS (constitutive NOS [cNOS]: neuronal and endothelial [ecNOS]) in our preparations. The porphyrinic microsensor was placed in the bathing fluid onto the mucosal surface of tracheal or main bronchial segments. Addition of bradykinin vehicle (0.9% saline) did not cause any detectable change of the baseline signal. Addition of bradykinin caused an upward shift of the baseline that reached a maximum within 1 to 2 s. The amplitude of the response to bradykinin was concentration-dependent between the range 1 nM to 10 microM, with a maximum effect at 10 microM. Bradykinin-induced NO release was higher in tracheal than in main bronchial segments. The selective bradykinin B(2) receptor antagonist D-Arg(0)-[Hyp(3), Thi(5), D-Tic(7), Oic(8)]bradykinin (1 microM) inhibited NO release induced by a submaximum concentration of bradykinin (1 microM). The ability of bradykinin to release NO was markedly reduced in epithelium-denuded segments, and abolished in Ca(2+)-free conditions and after pretreatment with N(G)-monomethyl-L-arginine (100 microM), but not with N(G)-monomethyl-D-arginine. Both cNOS isoforms were present in trachea and main bronchi, ecNOS being the predominant isoform in the epithelium. The study shows that bradykinin via B(2) receptor activation caused a rapid and Ca(2+)-dependent release of NO, mainly, but not exclusively, derived from the epithelium. It also shows that both cNOS isoforms may be involved in bradykinin-evoked NO release.

1. The endothelin (ET) receptor subtype that mediates niric oxide (NO)-dependent airway relaxation in tracheal tube preparations precontracted with carbachol and pretreated with indomethacin was investigated. The release of NO induced by ET from guinea-pig trachea using a recently developed porphyrinic microsensor was also measured. 2. ET-1 (1 pM-100 nM) contracted tracheal tube preparations pretreated with the NO-synthase inhibitor, L-NMMA, and relaxed, in an epithelium-dependent manner, preparations pretreated with the inactive enantiomer D-NMMA. The effect of L-NMMA was reversed by L-Arg, but not by D-Arg. 3. The selective ET(B) receptor agonists, IRL 1620 or sarafotoxin S6c, both (1 pM-100 nM) contracted tracheal tube preparations in a similar manner either after treatment with D-NMMA or with L-NMMA. In the presence of the ET(A) receptor antagonist, FR139317 (10 microM), ET-1 administration resulted in a contraction that was similar after either L-NMMA or D-NMMA. In the presence of the ET(B) receptor antagonist, BQ788 (1 microM), ET-1 relaxed and contracted tracheas pretreated with D-NMMA and L-NMMA, respectively. 4. Exposure of tracheal segments to ET-1 (1-1000 nM) caused a concentration-dependent increase in NO release that was reduced by L-NMMA. IRL1620 (1 microM) did not cause any significant NO release. FR139317 (10 microM), but not, BQ788 (1 microM), inhibited the NO release induced by ET-1. 5. These results demonstrate that in the isolated guinea-pig trachea activation of ET(B) receptors results in a contractile response, whereas activation of ET(A) receptors cause both a contraction, and an epithelium-dependent relaxation that is mediated by NO release.