Search

Drivers of Spitz neoplasms include activating point mutations in HRAS and Spitz-associated genomic fusions. It has become evident that some BRAF -mutated melanocytic neoplasms can morphologically mimic Spitz tumors (STs). These have been termed BRAF mutated and morphologically spitzoid (BAMS). In this study, 17 experts from the International Melanoma Pathology Study Group assessed 54 cases which included 40 BAMS and 14 true STs. The participants reviewed the cases blinded to the genomic data and selected among several diagnostic options, including BAMS, ST, melanoma, and other. A total of 38% of all diagnostic selections in the BAMS cases were for BAMS, whereas 32% were for ST. In 22 of the BAMS cases, the favored diagnosis was BAMS, whereas in 17 of the BAMS cases, the favored diagnosis was ST. Among the 20 cases in the total group of 54 with the highest number of votes for ST, half were BAMS. Of BAMS, 75% had a number of votes for ST that was within the SD of votes for ST seen among true ST cases. There was poor interobserver agreement for the precise diagnosis of the BAMS (kappa = 0.16) but good agreement that these cases were not melanoma (kappa = 0.7). BAMS nevi/tumors can closely mimic Spitz neoplasms. Expert melanoma pathologists in this study favored a diagnosis of ST in nearly half of the BAMS cases. There are BAMS cases that even experts cannot morphologically distinguish from true Spitz neoplasms., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest and Source of Funding: P.G. has served as a consultant for Castle Biosciences and has received royalties for textbooks from Elsevier. For the remaining authors, none were declared., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Abstract: Preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME) is a tumor-associated antigen first identified in a melanoma patient and found to be expressed in most melanomas as well as in variable levels in other malignant neoplasms of epithelial, mesenchymal, or hematolymphoid lineage. Detection of PRAME expression in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue is possible by immunohistochemistry (IHC) with commercially available monoclonal antibodies. In situ and invasive melanoma frequently show a diffuse pattern of nuclear PRAME immunoreactivity which contrasts with the infrequent and typically nondiffuse staining seen in nevi. In many challenging melanocytic tumors, results of PRAME IHC and other ancillary tests correlate well, but not always: The tests are not interchangeable. Most metastatic melanomas are positive for PRAME, whereas nodal nevi are not. Numerous studies on PRAME IHC have become available in the past few years with results supporting the value of PRAME IHC as an ancillary tool in the evaluation of melanocytic lesions and providing insights into limitations in sensitivity and specificity as well as possible pitfalls that need to be kept in mind by practicing pathologists., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Abstract: Spitzoid melanocytic neoplasms are a diagnostically challenging class of lesions in dermatopathology. Recently, molecular assays and immunohistochemical markers have been explored as ancillary methods to assist in the diagnostic workup. Specifically, preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME) immunohistochemistry is a nuclear stain commonly positive in melanomas, but not in nevi. This study investigates PRAME immunoreactivity (≥75% positive nuclear staining in tumor cells) in a set of 59 spitzoid melanocytic neoplasms with known clinical outcomes. We compared PRAME status with (1) the clinical outcomes, (2) the morphologic diagnoses, and (3) the status of TERT promoter mutation. Regarding clinical outcomes, 3 cases developed metastatic disease, of which 2 expressed diffusely positive PRAME staining. Of the 56 cases that did not show evidence of metastasis, 6 expressed diffusely positive PRAME staining. Morphologically, diffusely positive PRAME staining was seen in 7 of 21 cases (33.3%) diagnosed as melanoma and only 1 benign tumor 1 of 38 (2.6%). There were 4 of 8 cases with a TERT promoter mutation which were diffusely PRAME-positive compared with 4 of 51 cases without TERT promoter mutation ( P = 0.001). Our results show a statistically significant correlation between PRAME expression and the diagnosis, outcome, and TERT promoter mutation status of atypical spitzoid melanocytic neoplasms, suggesting immunohistochemistry for PRAME can help support a suspected diagnosis. However, because of occasional false-positive and negative test results, correlation with the clinical and histologic findings as well as results from other tests is needed for the interpretation of diagnostically challenging spitzoid melanocytic neoplasms., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

The distinction of metastatic melanoma from melanocytic nevi in lymph nodes can on occasion be difficult. As diffuse immunohistochemical (IHC) PRAME (PReferentially expressed Antigen in MElanoma) expression is detected in the majority of primary and metastatic melanomas, but rarely in nevi, we reasoned that PRAME could be a useful adjunct marker for the diagnosis of melanocytes in lymph nodes. In this study, we examined 45 nodal melanocytic deposits comprising 30 nodal nevi and 15 melanoma metastases. The latter were diagnostically not straightforward because they either coexisted with nodal nevi or were present in perinodal fibrous tissue. All nodal nevi (30/30) were negative for PRAME, whereas all melanoma metastases (15/15) were diffusely positive for PRAME IHC. We additionally report the novel use of a PRAME/Melan A dual-label immunostain. Our results show that PRAME IHC may be useful in the assessment of diagnostically challenging nodal melanocytic deposits, such as intraparenchymal nodal nevi, metastases confined to the capsular fibrous tissue, or in the setting of small metastases coexisting with a nodal nevus in the same lymph node.

Melanocytic nevi (MN) encompass a range of benign tumors with varying microscopic and macroscopic features. Their development is a multifactorial process under genetic and environmental influences. The clinical importance of MN lies in distinguishing them from melanoma and in recognizing their associations with melanoma risk and cancer syndromes. Historically, the distinction between the different types of MN, as well as between MN and melanoma, was based on clinical history, gross morphology, and histopathological features. While histopathology with clinical correlation remains the gold standard for differentiating and diagnosing melanocytic lesions, in some cases, this may not be possible. The use of dermoscopy has allowed for the assessment of subsurface skin structures and has contributed to the clinical evaluation and classification of MN. Genetic profiling, while still in its early stages, has the greatest potential to refine the classification of MN by clarifying their developmental processes, biological behaviors, and relationships to melanoma. Here we review the most salient clinical, dermoscopic, histopathological, and genetic features of different MN subgroups.

Desmoplastic melanoma (DM) is a variant of spindle cell melanoma characterized by the presence of abundant fibrous matrix. It is typically found in the head and neck region on chronically sun-damaged skin of older individuals. Early detection is uncommon, because its clinical features are not distinctive. DM is prone to misdiagnosis not only clinically but also histologically. It may simulate a sclerosing melanocytic nevus and various benign and malignant nonmelanocytic lesions. Among melanomas said to be desmoplastic by various pathologists there is significant variation with regard to the extent of intratumoral fibrosis. It may be prominent throughout the entire tumor (pure DM) or represent a portion of an otherwise nondesmoplastic melanoma (combined DM). Immunophenotypically, DM are usually strongly and homogeneously positive for S-100 protein, but are often negative or only focally positive for melanocyte differentiation antigens. DM differs from conventional melanoma in its clinical course. It is associated with a higher tendency for local recurrence, but metastases to regional lymph nodes are less common., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Nevoid melanoma may resemble benign compound or intradermal nevi by their silhouette and profile on low power. Higher power usually reveals nuclear atypia, confluence of cells, incomplete maturation and dermal mitotic activity. However, to some extent all of these features maybe seen in benign compound or intradermal nevi and no single criteria can be used to differentiate nevoid melanoma from a benign nevus. The distinction can be particularly problematic in nevi that show mitotic activity and we have noted a recent trend in diagnosis of melanocytic neoplasms with dermal mitosis as nevoid melanoma despite the presence of normal maturation in the dermis and lack of significant nuclear atypia. Therefore in this study we evaluated 10 nevoid melanomas, 4 of which resulted in metastasis and 10 mitotically active nevi with fluorescence in situ hybridization targeting key chromosomal loci previously shown to effectively discriminate been malignant and benign melanocytic neoplasms. All 10 nevoid melanomas showed copy number abnormalities by fluorescence in situ hybridization in either chromosome 6 or 11 while none of the 10 mitotically active nevi did. The results demonstrate that fluorescence in situ hybridization targeting key chromosomal loci on chromosomes 6 and 11 can be effective in discriminating nevoid melanomas from mitotically active nevi. Additionally, our study presents further evidence that dermal mitoses alone without other diagnostic features such as nuclear atypia and lack of maturation does not constitute sufficient evidence alone for a diagnosis of melanoma.

PNL2 is a novel monoclonal antibody, which has recently been introduced as an immunohistochemical reagent to stain melanocyte and tumors derived thereof. In the present study, we analyzed the immunoreactivity of this mAb in various normal tissues, melanocytic nevi, primary and metastatic melanoma, nonmelanocytic tumors, including histologic mimickers of melanoma as well as angiomyolipoma, and multiple cell lines derived from different tumors types. We used several tissue microarray panels as well as selected conventional sections from tissue blocks. For metastatic melanoma, immunoreactivity for PNL2 was compared with A103 (Melan-A/MART-1), T311 (tyrosinase), HMB45 (gp100), and D5 (MITF). Positive staining with PNL2 was found in normal melanocytes and neutrophils, but no other normal cell type. Among melanocytic lesions, both benign nevi as well as primary malignant melanomas, especially epithelioid variants thereof, were commonly immunopositive. Only 1 of 13 desmoplastic melanomas reacted with PNL2. PNL2 showed high sensitivity for metastatic melanoma (87%). In comparison, 82% of metastatic melanomas were positive for A103, 76% for HMB45, 92% for T311, and 84% for D5. The combined use of all five reagents minimized the number of immunonegative cases. None of the selected nonmelanocytic tumors (carcinomas or soft tissue neoplasms) was positive for PNL2 in this series except for angiomyolipomas and chronic myeloid leukemias and 1 single case of a malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor with heterologous differentiation (malignant Triton tumor). Despite its reactivity with neutrophils, PNL2 appears to be a valuable supplementary reagent for the diagnosis of melanocytic tumors.

A subset of Spitz tumors harbor fusions of NTRK3 with ETV6, MYO5A, and MYH9. We evaluated a series of 22 melanocytic tumors in which an NTRK3 fusion was identified as part of the diagnostic workup. Tumors in which NTRK3 was fused to ETV6 occurred in younger patients were predominantly composed of epithelioid melanocytes and were classified by their histopathologic features as Spitz tumors. In contrast, those in which NTRK3 was fused to MYO5A were predominantly composed of spindled melanocytes arrayed in fascicles with neuroid features such as pseudo-Verocay bodies. To further investigate the effects of the fusion kinases ETV6-NTRK3 and MYO5A-NTRK3 in melanocytes, we expressed them in immortalized melanocytes and determined their subcellular localization by immunofluorescence. ETV6-NTRK3 was localized to the nucleus and diffusely within the cytoplasm and caused melanocytes to adopt an epithelioid cytomorphology. In contrast, MYO5A-NTRK3, appeared excluded from the nucleus of melanocytes, was localized to dendrites, and resulted in a highly dendritic cytomorphology. Our findings indicate that ETV6-NTRK3 and MYO5A-NTRK3 have distinct subcellular localizations and effects on cellular morphology.

A subset of Spitz tumors is associated with a copy number increase of chromosome 11p and activating mutations of HRAS. These aberrations have been reported to occur in association with desmoplastic Spitz nevi. Little is known to what extent 11p gains can also be found in nondesmoplastic tumors. To learn more about the spectrum of microscopic and cytogenetic changes that can be seen in Spitz lesions in association with 11p gains, we reviewed the clinical and pathologic features of 40 cases. Patient ages ranged from 3 to 75 years. The most common anatomic site was the head and neck region, followed by the upper extremities. Prominent desmoplasia was present in 10 cases. Seven tumors lacked significant stromal fibrosis. Twenty tumors were mitotically active. Novel microscopic features encountered in a few cases include a tumor with a polypoid silhouette and papillomatous surface and rare atypical tumors with a deep bulbous growth pattern. Among 36 cases analyzed by single-nucleotide polymorphism array or comparative genomic hybridization, 28 tumors had gains of the entire or near-entire p-arm of chromosome 11 with no other coexisting unbalanced genomic aberration. Eight cases had additional changes; 6 of these with 1 additional aberration per case, and 2 cases had several chromosomal aberrations. We also examined a subset of tumors by fluorescence in situ hybridization for the HRAS gene locus (11p15.5). All tumors were fluorescence in situ hybridization-positive. In conclusion, we expand the spectrum of pathologic findings associated with Spitz tumors with 11p gains. This cytogenetic aberration is not restricted to desmoplastic Spitz nevi. It can also be seen in nondesmoplastic and papillomatous lesions and atypical melanocytic tumors with a deep bulbous growth. We also document that in some Spitz tumors additional cytogenetic aberrations may be found, the significance of which remains to be determined.

Although nevus count is an established risk factor for melanoma, relationships between nevus number and patient and tumor characteristics have not been well studied and the influence of nevus count on melanoma-specific survival is equivocal. Using data from the Genes, Environment and Melanoma (GEM) study, a large population-based study of primary cutaneous melanoma, we evaluated associations between number of nevi and patient features, including sun-sensitivity summarized in a phenotypic index, and tumor characteristics. We also assessed the association of nevus count with melanoma-specific survival. Higher nevus counts were independently and positively associated with male gender and younger age at diagnosis, and they were inversely associated with lentigo maligna histology. We observed a borderline significant trend of poorer melanoma-specific survival with increasing quartile of nevus count, but little or no association between number of nevi and pigmentary phenotypic characteristics or prognostic tumor features.

Activating kinase fusions have recently been described as early oncogenic events that are mutually exclusive with HRAS and BRAF mutations in Spitz tumors. Here, we report a series of 32 Spitz tumors with ALK fusions (6 Spitz nevi, 22 atypical Spitz tumors, and 4 spitzoid melanomas) in patients ranging from 5 months to 64 years (median=12 y) of age. The tumors typically presented as exophytic papules on the extremities and were occasionally darkly pigmented. In addition to ALK fusions previously described in other tumor types (NPM1-ALK, TPR-ALK), we identified 2 novel ALK fusions (CLIP1-ALK and GTF3C2-ALK) in our cohort of Spitz tumors. Array comparative genomic hybridization of 19 of these tumors demonstrated a high frequency of chromosome 2 aberrations (where ALK resides, 63%) and chromosome 1p loss in 37% of the cases. Spitz tumors with ALK fusions demonstrated unique histopathologic features. Clefts and small vesicle-like spaces were arrayed between plump spindled melanocytes with fibrillar cytoplasm and enlarged nuclei. These melanocytes were typically arrayed in elongated and fusiform nests with radial orientation. The tumors often had extension into the dermis or subcutis with a wedge-shaped or bulbous lower border (45% and 17%, respectively). An infiltrative growth pattern was often present at the periphery of the tumor and was highlighted by ALK immunohistochemistry. In conclusion, Spitz tumors with ALK rearrangement show distinct histopathologic features that should aid in improving classification of these diagnostically challenging tumors.

Spitzoid neoplasms are a group of melanocytic tumours with distinctive histopathological features. They include benign tumours (Spitz naevi), malignant tumours (spitzoid melanomas) and tumours with borderline histopathological features and uncertain clinical outcome (atypical Spitz tumours). Their genetic underpinnings are poorly understood, and alterations in common melanoma-associated oncogenes are typically absent. Here we show that spitzoid neoplasms harbour kinase fusions of ROS1 (17%), NTRK1 (16%), ALK (10%), BRAF (5%) and RET (3%) in a mutually exclusive pattern. The chimeric proteins are constitutively active, stimulate oncogenic signalling pathways, are tumourigenic and are found in the entire biologic spectrum of spitzoid neoplasms, including 55% of Spitz naevi, 56% of atypical Spitz tumours and 39% of spitzoid melanomas. Kinase inhibitors suppress the oncogenic signalling of the fusion proteins in vitro. In summary, kinase fusions account for the majority of oncogenic aberrations in spitzoid neoplasms and may serve as therapeutic targets for metastatic spitzoid melanomas.

We simply report the findings to alert practicing dermatopathologists to the risk for false-positive test results with this GEP test, and that it may be enriched for Spitz tumors (Figure 1). Melanocytic neoplasms can be diagnostically challenging using light microscopy alone.[1] Because the histopathologic findings can be ambiguous, various ancillary methods have been explored to assist in the diagnosis. Malignant melanoma test results by a commercial 35-gene expression test are enriched for benign or atypical Spitz tumors. [Extracted from the article]

BRCA1‐associated protein 1 (BAP1) is a tumor suppressor gene, located on chromosome 3p21, encoding BAP1 nuclear protein, which is associated with a subset of melanocytic tumors with distinct cytologic features. Single nucleotide polymorphism array (SNP‐array) is a molecular karyotyping technique that can detect copy number variations and loss of heterozygosity in various fresh and formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded tissues. Herein we present a 56‐year‐old female, who presented with a lesion on her left nose/cheek that was growing in size and changing in color. Histopathology was characteristic of a BAP1‐deficient melanocytic neoplasm, with a biphasic population of cytologically bland conventional nevomelanocytes and a proliferation of large epithelioid melanocytes with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm. Immunohistochemistry for BAP1 showed loss of nuclear labeling in the epithelioid melanocytes. SNP‐array revealed a chromosome 21q22.1 monoaberration with no chromosome 3 abnormalities. The detection of this aberration prompted a discussion as to whether the lesion was best designated as a nevus or tumor. SNP‐array on the patient's blood showed the same monoaberration of chromosome 21q22.1. This case emphasizes the importance of interpreting microarray results in the context of morphology, as germline aberrations can be a pitfall when assessing the genomic stability of a melanocytic proliferation by SNP array. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Melanocytic naevi are benign lesions of the skin or mucosa that may constitute non‐obligate precursors of malignant melanoma, particularly when they show lentiginous and dysplastic features. The aim of this study was to investigate the repertoire of somatic genetic alterations in melanocytic naevi. Methods and results: DNA extracted from 12 melanocytic naevi and DNA from matching normal tissue were separately microdissected and subjected to targeted massively parallel sequencing of ≥300 cancer genes. A median of 5.5 (range 1–12) non‐synonymous somatic mutations were detected, with 10 cases harbouring mutually exclusive BRAF V600E (6/12) or NRAS (4/12) clonal hotspot mutations. One of the two cases lacking BRAF and NRAS mutations was a dysplastic naevus harbouring an HRAS Q61L hotspot mutation. Analysis of the laser‐capture microdissected components of a naevus synchronously diagnosed with in‐situ and invasive malignant melanoma revealed a truncal, clonal BRAF V600E mutation, and the acquisition of a CDKN2A homozygous deletion in the invasive component, in conjunction with additional clonal mutations affecting NF2,FAT4 and KDR in both in‐situ and invasive malignant components. Conclusion: Melanocytic naevi harbour recurrent BRAF V600E or NRAS hotspot mutations with low mutational burdens. Our findings also show that progression from naevi to malignant melanoma may be driven by the acquisition of additional genetic alterations, including CDKN2A homozygous deletions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Clear cell sarcoma ( CCS) typically presents as a tumor in the deep soft tissue of extremities, but when centered in the dermis it may be confused with a melanocytic nevus, primary nodular or metastatic melanoma. Compound variants of CCS, i.e. tumor cells present in both the epidermis and underlying soft tissue have not yet been described. Herein we report such a case, which initially presented as a nodule on the left wrist of a young woman at 19 years of age. The lesion was then interpreted as 'Spitz nevus, compound type'. Twelve years later the patient noticed an enlarged lymph node in the right axilla. The excised lymph node was nearly completely replaced by malignant tumor cells, which were immunoreactive for S100 protein. They resembled the tumor cells of the wrist lesion. Cytogenetic analysis of the metastatic tumor revealed a t(12;22) translocation. Fluorescence in situ hybridization confirmed Ewing's sarcoma breakpoint region 1 ( EWSR1) rearrangement in 70% of the tumor cells, thereby supporting the diagnosis of metastatic CCS. Our case is of interest because it documents that CCS can involve the epidermis. This observation expands the morphological spectrum associated with this tumor. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A 4-color fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay, using probes to chromosomes 11q, 6p, 6q, and 6 cent, has recently been proposed as an ancillary tool for the diagnosis of melanoma. The authors report herein their experience with this assay. To determine the sensitivity and specificity of the assay for histopathologically unequivocal cases, they analyzed 50 melanocytic nevi, 50 primary melanomas, and 15 metastatic melanomas. Of 50 melanocytic nevi, 47 were FISH negative on initial readout (test sensitivity, 94%); 49 were FISH negative after correction for tetraploidy (test specificity, 98%). Of 50 primary melanomas, 41 were FISH positive (test sensitivity, 82%). Of 15 metastatic lesions, 13 were FISH positive (test sensitivity, 85%). Of the 9 FISH-negative melanomas, 6 metastasized. The tumors of the 5 patients who had survived thick primary melanoma for more than 5 years without recurrence were all FISH positive. Half of the patients whose primary melanoma was tested by FISH had undergone sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy. When the authors compared the FISH results of those 25 melanomas with the SLN status, no statistically significant correlation was found. These findings document limitations of the current FISH assay. A rare nevus may be FISH positive. Some primary metastasizing melanomas are FISH negative. Even metastatic melanomas can be FISH negative. Awareness of the limitations in test sensitivity and specificity of the FISH assay is important to avoid an erroneous diagnosis by overreliance on cytogenetic findings. Correlation with clinical and histopathological findings is paramount for accurate diagnosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Metastatic melanoma can on rare occasion simulate the appearance of a blue nevus clinically and/or histopathologically, which may lead to diagnostic confusion and delay in treatment. Given the known difficulty in recognizing a small dermal blue nevus-like melanoma metastasis by light microscopic findings alone, recent discoveries of unique cytogenetic aberrations in various types of melanomas have led pathologists to explore cytogenetic techniques as an ancillary diagnostic tool. Herein, we report a case of a 58-year-old man with a history of uveal melanoma, in which fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis for monosomy 3 helped confirm a diagnosis of blue nevus-like uveal melanoma metastasis. The patient had presented clinically with a new small 1-mm dark blue-gray macule on the forehead. Histopathologically, a small dermal nodule of pigmented epithelioid melanocytes and melanophages was found with a rare mitotic figure. The pathologist's suspicion of a blue nevus-like melanoma metastasis was confirmed by FISH analysis: both the tumor cells of the patient's prior uveal melanoma and the melanocytes of the new dermal blue nevus-like nodule carried only one copy of chromosome 3. Furthermore, deletion of 1p36 and amplifications of 8q32 were also identified. Busam KJ, Fang Y, Jhanwar S, Lacouture M. Diagnosis of blue nevus-like metastatic uveal melanoma confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for monosomy 3. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Blue nevus-like melanomas are melanomas that arise in association with blue nevi or closely simulate the histopathologic appearance of a blue nevus, usually a cellular blue nevus (CBN). Although the majority of CBN can be readily distinguished from blue nevus-like melanoma by conventional microscopy, there are a subset of cases where this distinction may be exceedingly difficult or impossible. In this study, we evaluated the ability of a fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay targeting 6p25 (RREB1), 6q23 (MYB), 11q13 (CCND1) and the centromere of chromosome 6 (Cep6) to distinguish between CBN and blue nevus-like melanoma. We identified five cases of blue nevus-like melanoma and 12 cases of CBN. The FISH assay was performed with 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity. Three of five cases met the 6p25/Cep6 criteria, all five met the 6p25 gain criteria and three of five met the 6q23/Cep6 loss criteria. None of the cases met criteria for gains in 11q13. None of the 12 CBN met any criteria for melanoma. A combined analysis of clinical aspects, histopathologic changes and FISH analysis could potentially contribute significantly to the ability of pathologists to discriminate between blue nevus-like melanoma and blue nevi in challenging cases. Gammon B, Beilfuss B, Guitart J, Busam KJ, Gerami P. Fluorescence in situ hybridization for distinguishing cellular blue nevi from blue nevus-like melanoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Patients with the atypical mole syndrome have multiple dysplastic nevi that appear to be randomly distributed on certain preferred anatomical sites such as the upper back. These dysplastic nevi are thought to be acquired melanocytic nevi that begin appearing at puberty. To our knowledge, the presence of agminated atypical (dysplastic) nevi has not been reported. Observation: We describe a patient with the atypical mole syndrome who has more than 100 melanocytic nevi, many of which are clinically atypical and one of which proved to be a melanoma. Among his many melanocytic nevi is a cluster of approximately 50 nevi that are distributed in an area measuring 5 x 3 cm. The histopathologic features of these nevi are consistent with the diagnosis of "dysplastic nevus." Conclusions: To our knowledge, agminated atypical (dysplastic) nevi have not been described previously. The presence of agminated atypical (dysplastic) nevi in a patient with the atypical mole syndrome can be theorized to arise because of loss of heterozygosity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]