Search

Objective: Recruitment of diverse and talented students to the field of neurosurgery is key to its continued growth and scientific advancement. Barriers, including poor perceptions and lack of early exposure, can impact recruitment and have been compounded by the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. This study examines the impact of an inaugural Neurosurgery Research Consortium meeting on premedical students, assessing whether this exposure generated interest and improved perceptions of a career in neurosurgery., Methods: Premedical students were recruited to virtually attend an inaugural Neurosurgery Research Consortium developed by the affiliated medical school's American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS) Student Chapter. Questionnaires were distributed to students before and after the meeting to assess student demographics and perceptions of neurosurgery., Results: A total of 54 students attended the meeting, with general interest in neurosurgery, medicine, and research opportunities being the primary factors for attendance. Following the research meeting, we found that students perceived neurosurgeons to be friendlier and more approachable, with a more positive quality of life (QoL). Overall perceptions of neurosurgery improved after the meeting, but perceptions among racial and ethnic minority students did not significantly change in the areas of diversity, inclusion, and equity., Conclusions: These results suggest recruitment strategies targeting undergraduate students may improve their perception of neurosurgery as a career, and may mitigate some barriers to entry. These strategies are cost effective and easily replicable, making an easily implementable approach to provide direct insight into neurosurgery for future medical students while also promoting academic efforts in the field of neurosurgery., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Virtual mentorship and research programs are becoming increasingly popular to facilitate education and career development for students and residents. We review virtual research initiatives for early trainees in neurosurgery and describe our effort to expand access to resources and shared objective mentorship (SOM) via the novel Neurosurgery Education and Research Virtual Group (NERVE)., Methods: A systematic review of neurosurgical programming delivered via a virtual platform was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases. Identified articles were screened. Those meeting prespecified inclusion criteria were reviewed in full and examined for relevant data. Data analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel, and means and standard deviations were calculated. Descriptive analysis of NERVE characteristics was also performed., Results: Of the 2438 identified articles, 10 were included. The most common (70%) implementation style was a webinar-based lecture series. The least common (10%) was a longitudinal curricular interest group. Of the total NERVE cohort, 90% were first generation medical students and 82% attended institutions without home programs. Survey results indicated 73.8% had contributed to at least 2 research projects throughout the year., Conclusions: There is a scarcity of virtual neurosurgical resources which facilitate SOM opportunities for trainees. In our systematic review, NERVE is the only multi-institutional virtual initiative aimed at increasing access to neurosurgical education and research opportunities for the purpose of SOM among early trainees from disadvantaged backgrounds. This highlights the group's niche and potential impact on increasing diversity in neurosurgery, improving trainees' career development, and facilitating future resident research productivity., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) are rapidly growing technologies. Both have been applied within neurosurgery for presurgical planning and intraoperative navigation, but VR and AR technology is particularly promising for the education of neurosurgical trainees. With the increasing demand for high impact yet efficient educational strategies, VR- and AR-based simulators allow neurosurgical residents to practice technical skills in a low-risk setting. Initial studies have confirmed that such simulators increase trainees' confidence, improve their understanding of operative anatomy, and enhance surgical techniques. Knowledge of the history and conceptual underpinnings of these technologies is useful to understand their current and future applications towards neurosurgical training. The technological precursors for VR and AR were introduced as early as the 1800s, and draw from the fields of entertainment, flight simulation, and education. However, computer software and processing speeds are needed to develop widespread VR- and AR-based surgical simulators, which have only been developed within the last 15 years. During that time, several devices had become rapidly adopted by neurosurgeons, and some programs had begun to incorporate them into the residency curriculum. With ever-improving technology, VR and AR are promising additions to a multi-modal training program, enabling neurosurgical residents to maximize their efforts in preparation for the operating room. In this review, we outline the historical development of the VR and AR systems that are used in neurosurgical training and discuss representative examples of the current technology., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Neurosurgical residents receive exposure to the subspecialty of pediatric neurosurgery during training. The authors sought to determine resident operative experience in pediatric neurosurgery across Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited neurosurgical programs., Methods: During 2018-2019, pediatric neurosurgical case logs for recent graduates or current residents who completed their primary pediatric exposure were collected from US continental ACGME training programs. Using individual resident reports and procedure designations, operative volumes and case diversity were analyzed collectively, according to training site characteristics, and also correlated with the recently described Resident Experience Score (RES)., Results: Of the 114 programs, a total of 316 resident case logs (range 1-19 residents per program) were received from 86 (75%) programs. The median cumulative pediatric case volume per resident was 109 (IQR 75-161). Residents at programs with a pediatric fellowship reported a higher median case volume (143, IQR 96-187) than residents at programs without (91, IQR 66-129; p < 0.0001). Residents at programs that outsource their pediatric rotation had a lower median case volume (84, IQR 52-114) compared with those at programs with an in-house experience (117, IQR 79-170; p < 0.0001). The case diversity index among all programs ranged from 0.61 to 0.80, with no statistically significant differences according to the Accreditation Council for Pediatric Neurosurgery Fellowships designation or pediatric experience site (p > 0.05). The RES correlated moderately (r = 0.44) with median operative volumes per program. A program's annual pediatric operative volume and duration of pediatric experience were identified as significant predictive factors for median resident operative volume., Conclusions: Resident experience in pediatric neurosurgery is variable within and between programs. Case volumes are generally higher for residents at programs with in-house exposure and an accredited fellowship, but case diversity is relatively uniform across all programs. RES provides some insight on anticipated case volume, but other unexplained factors remain.

Objective: Surgical education has increasingly relied on electronic learning. In particular, online operative videos have become a core resource within neurosurgery. We analyze the forums for neurosurgical operative videos., Methods: Operative videos from 5 sources were reviewed: 1) the NEUROSURGERY Journal YouTube channel; 2) the American Association of Neurological Surgeons Neurosurgery YouTube channel; 3) The Neurosurgical Atlas Operative Video Cases; 4) Operative Neurosurgery; and 5) Neurosurgical Focus: Video. Title, year of publication, senior author, institution, country, and subspecialty were documented for each video., Results: A total of 1233 videos showing 1247 surgeries were identified. Ten videos included >1 surgery; of those, there was a median of 2 surgeries (interquartile range, 2.0-2.5) per video. The most frequently represented subspecialties included vascular (48.3%), tumor (35.2%), and skull base surgery (27.5%), with almost 40% of videos showing >1 category. Videos were submitted by investigators from 28 countries, but 82.1% of the videos originated in the United States., Conclusions: Neurosurgical operative videos have become increasingly common through a variety of online platforms. Future efforts may benefit from collecting videos from underrepresented regions and subspecialties, providing long-term follow-up data and showing techniques for managing complications., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

After becoming widespread during the COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine continues to play an important role in outpatient neurosurgical care. Nevertheless, the factors that influence individual decisions to choose telemedicine versus in-person appointments remain understudied. Here, we performed a prospective survey of pediatric neurosurgical patients and caregivers presenting for telemedicine or in-person outpatient visits, to identify factors associated with appointment choice. All patients and caregivers with an outpatient pediatric neurosurgical encounter at Connecticut Children's between January 31st and May 20th, 2022, were invited to participate in this survey. Data related to demographics, socioeconomics, technological access, COVID-19 vaccination status, and appointment preferences were collected. During the study period, there were 858 unique pediatric neurosurgical outpatient encounters (86.1% in-person and 13.9% telemedicine). A total of 212 (24.7%) respondents completed the survey. Those with a telemedicine appointment were more likely to be white (P = 0.005), not Hispanic or Latino (P = 0.020), have private insurance (P = 0.003), be established patients (P < 0.001), have a household income >$80,000 (P = 0.005), and have caregivers who completed a 4-year college degree (P < 0.001). Those who were seen in-person cited the patient's condition, quality of care, and communication as important factors, whereas those who were seen via telemedicine cited time, travel, and convenience. While convenience influences some to choose telemedicine, concerns regarding the quality of care persist among those who prefer in-person encounters. Recognizing these factors will minimize barriers to care, better define the appropriate populations/contexts for each encounter type, and improve the integration of telemedicine within an outpatient neurosurgical setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]