1. Presurgical Brain Mapping of the Ventral Somatomotor Network in Patients with Brain Tumors Using Resting-State fMRI
- Author
-
Haris I. Sair, Raag D. Airan, Brian Caffo, Jay J. Pillai, Martin A. Lindquist, Sachin K. Gujar, N. Yahyavi-Firouz-Abadi, Vince D. Calhoun, and Shruti Agarwal
- Subjects
Male ,genetic structures ,EEG-fMRI ,Somatosensory system ,behavioral disciplines and activities ,Brain mapping ,030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Sørensen–Dice coefficient ,Neural Pathways ,medicine ,Humans ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,General linear model ,Brain Mapping ,Functional ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,Resting state fMRI ,Brain Neoplasms ,business.industry ,Magnetic resonance imaging ,Somatosensory Cortex ,Magnetic Resonance Imaging ,nervous system ,Linear Models ,Female ,Neurology (clinical) ,Analysis of variance ,business ,Neuroscience ,psychological phenomena and processes ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery - Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Resting-state fMRI readily identifies the dorsal but less consistently the ventral somatomotor network. Our aim was to assess the relative utility of resting-state fMRI in the identification of the ventral somatomotor network via comparison with task-based fMRI in patients with brain tumor. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 26 surgically naive patients referred for presurgical fMRI brain mapping who had undergone both satisfactory ventral motor activation tasks and resting-state fMRI. Following standard preprocessing for task-based fMRI and resting-state fMRI, general linear model analysis of the ventral motor tasks and independent component analysis of resting-state fMRI were performed with the number of components set to 20, 30, 40, and 50. Visual overlap of task-based fMRI and resting-state fMRI at different component levels was assessed and categorized as full match, partial match, or no match. Rest-versus-task-fMRI concordance was calculated with Dice coefficients across varying fMRI thresholds before and after noise removal. Multithresholded Dice coefficient volume under the surface was calculated. RESULTS: The ventral somatomotor network was identified in 81% of patients. At the subject level, better matches between resting-state fMRI and task-based fMRI were seen with an increasing order of components (53% of cases for 20 components versus 73% for 50 components). Noise-removed group-mean volume under the surface improved as component numbers increased from 20 to 50, though ANOVA demonstrated no statistically significant difference among the 4 groups. CONCLUSIONS: In most patients, the ventral somatomotor network can be identified with an increase in the probability of a better match at a higher component number. There is variable concordance of the ventral somatomotor network at the single-subject level between resting-state and task-based fMRI.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF