Search

Background: Currently, there are no available recommendations or guidelines on how to perform MRI monitoring in the management of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD). The issue is to determine a valuable MRI monitoring protocol to be applied in the management of NMOSD and MOGAD, as previously proposed for the monitoring of multiple sclerosis., Objectives: The objectives of this work are to establish proposals for a standardized and feasible MRI acquisition protocol, and to propose control time points for systematic MRI monitoring in the management of NMOSD and MOGAD., Methods: A steering committee composed of 7 neurologists and 5 neuroradiologists, experts in NMOSD and MOGAD from the French group NOMADMUS, defined 8 proposals based on their expertise and a review from the literature. These proposals were then submitted to a Rating Group composed of French NMOSD / MOGAD experts., Results: In the management of NMOSD and MOGAD, a consensus has been reached to perform systematic MRI of the brain, optic nerve and spinal cord, including cauda equina nerve roots, at the time of diagnosis, both without and after gadolinium administration. Moreover, it has been agreed to perform a systematic MRI scan 6 months after diagnosis, focusing on the area of interest, both without and after gadolinium administration. For long-term follow-up of NMOSD and MOGAD, and in the absence of clinical activity, it has been agreed to perform gadolinium-free MRI of the brain (+/- optic nerves) and spinal cord, every 36 months. Ideally, these MRI scans should be performed on the same MRI system, preferably a 3T MRI system for brain and optic nerve MRI, and at least a 1.5T MRI system for spinal cord MRI., Conclusions: This expert consensus approach provides physicians with proposals for the MRI management of NMOSD and MOGAD., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Françoise DURAND-DUBIEF has nothing to disclose. Natalia SHOR has nothing to disclose. Bertrand AUDOIN has nothing to disclose. Bertrand BOURRE serves on scientific advisory board, has received funding for travel and honoraria from Alexion, Biogen, BMS, Horizon, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi, Sandoz and Roche. Mikael Cohen has received personal compensation for consulting, serving on a scientific advisory board, speaking, or other activities with Biogen, Merck, Sanofi, Roche, Celgene-BMS, Janssen, Alexion, Horizon Therapeutics and Ad Scientiam. Stéphane KREMER has nothing to disclose. Elisabeth MAILLART reports research support from Biogen and personal fees for lectures and advisory boards from Alexion, Biogen, Horizon, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, and Teva. Caroline PAPEIX has received personal compensation for consulting, serving on a scientific advisory board, speaking from Alexion, Horizon, Roche. Aurélie RUET has received funding for travel or speaker or consultant honoraria from Biogen, Alexion, Novartis, Sanofi, Merck, Horizon Therapeutic; and received research support from Biogen, BMS, Sanofi, Roche, Merck. Julien SAVATOVSKY has nothing to disclose. Thomas TOURDIAS has nothing to disclose. Xavier AYRIGNAC has received consulting fees and lecturing fess, travel grants and undoncitional research support from Alexion, Biogen, Genzyme, Janssen, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Aventis and Teva Pharma. Jonathan CIRON has received personal compensation for consulting, serving on a scientific advisory board, speaking, or other activities with Biogen, Novartis, Merck, Sanofi, Roche, Alexion, Horizon Therapeutics, none related to this study. Nicolas COLLONGUES has received honoraria for consulting or presentation from Alexion, Biogen Idec, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Horizon Therapeutics, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche and Sanofi-Genzyme and is a member of the Editorial Board of the Journal de la Ligue Française contre la Sclérose en plaques and the Neurology and Therapy Journal. David LAPLAUD served on scientific advisory boards for Alexion, BMS, Roche, Sanofi, Novartis, Merck, Janssen and Biogen, received conference travel support and/or speaker honoraria from Alexion, Novartis, Biogen, Roche, Sanofi, BMS and Merck and received research support from Fondation ARSEP, Fondation EDMUS and Agence Nationale de la Recherche. Laure MICHEL has nothing to disclose. Romain DESCHAMPS has received personal compensation for serving on a scientific advisory board or travel grants from Biogen, Roche, Alexion, and Novartis. Eric THOUVENOT received consulting and lecturing fees, travel grants or unconditional research support from Actelion, Biogen, BMS, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Teva pharma. Hélène ZEPHIR received consulting fees and invitation for congresses from Alexion, Horizon Therapeutics, Roche, Sanofi, Janssen, Biogen Idex, Merck, BMS. HZ received research supports from Novartis, Roche. Romain MARIGNIER serves on scientific advisory boards for Horizon Therapeutics/Amgen; and has received funding for travel and fees from Alexion, Amgen Biogen, Roche, Sanofi. François COTTON reports grants, consulting fees, and non-financial support from Biogen, Bracco imaging, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Philips and Roche., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.. All rights reserved.)

Background: The kappa free light chains index (κ-index) is increasing in importance as a fast, easy, cost-effective, and quantitative biomarker in multiple sclerosis (MS), which can replace cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-restricted oligoclonal bands (OCB) detection. In previous studies, controls often included mixed patients with several inflammatory central nervous system disorders. The aim of the present study was to assess the κ-index in patients with serum aquaporin-4 (AQP4)-IgG or myelin-oligodendrocyte-glycoprotein (MOG)-IgG., Methods: We analyzed CSF/serum samples of patients with AQP4-IgG or MOG-Ig and evaluated distinct κ-index cut-offs. We described clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of patients with the highest κ-index values., Results: In 11 patients with AQP4-IgG, median κ-index was 16.8 (range 0.2; 63) and 6/11 (54.5%) had κ-index >12. Among 42 patients with MOG-IgG, 2 had low positive MOG-IgG titers, were ultimately diagnosed with MS, and had a markedly increased κ-index (54.1 and 102.5 respectively). For the remaining 40 MOG-IgG-positive patients the median κ-index was 0.3 (range 0.1; 15.5). Some 6/40 (15%) and 1/40 (2.5%) patients had a κ-index >6 and >12, respectively. None fulfilled MRI dissemination in space and dissemination in time (DIS/DIT) criteria and the final diagnosis was MOG-IgG-associated disease (MOGAD) for these 40 patients. Four of the 40 (10%) MOG-IgG-positive patients had OCB., Conclusion: While a marked increase in κ-index could discriminate MS from MOGAD, a low κ-index threshold could lead to confusion between MS and MOGAD or AQP4 antibody-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder., (© 2023 European Academy of Neurology.)

Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of plasma exchange (PLEX) for optic neuritis (ON)., Methods: We conducted an international multicenter retrospective study evaluating the outcomes of ON following PLEX. Outcomes were compared to raw data from the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial (ONTT) using a matched subset., Results: A total of 395 ON attack treated with PLEX from 317 patients were evaluated. The median age was 37 years (range 9-75), and 71% were female. Causes of ON included multiple sclerosis (108), myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD) (92), aquaporin-4-IgG-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (AQP4+NMOSD) (75), seronegative-NMOSD (34), idiopathic (83), and other (3). Median time from onset of vision loss to PLEX was 2.6 weeks (interquartile range [IQR], 1.4-4.0). Median visual acuity (VA) at the time of PLEX was count fingers (IQR, 20/200-hand motion), and median final VA was 20/25 (IQR, 20/20-20/60) with no differences among etiologies except MOGAD-ON, which had better outcomes. In 81 (20.5%) ON attacks, the final VA was 20/200 or worse. Patients with poor outcomes were older (P = .002), had worse VA at the time of PLEX (P < .001), and longer delay to PLEX (P < .001). In comparison with the ONTT subset with severe corticosteroid-unresponsive ON, a final VA of worse than 20/40 occurred in 6 of 50 (12%) PLEX-treated ON vs 7 of 19 (37%) from the ONTT treated with intravenous methylprednisolone without PLEX (P = .04)., Conclusion: Most ON attacks improved with PLEX, and outcomes were better than attacks with similar severity in the ONTT. The presence of severe vision loss at nadir, older age, and longer delay to PLEX predicted a worse outcome whereas MOGAD-ON had a more favorable prognosis. NOTE: Publication of this article is sponsored by the American Ophthalmological Society., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Objectives: Exit strategies such as de-escalations have not been evaluated for rituximab in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). We hypothesized that they are associated with disease reactivations and aimed to estimate this risk., Methods: We describe a case series of real-world de-escalations from the French NMOSD registry (NOMADMUS). All patients met the 2015 International Panel for NMO Diagnosis (IPND) diagnostic criteria for NMOSD. A computerized screening of the registry extracted patients with rituximab de-escalations and at least 12 months of subsequent follow-up. We searched for 7 de-escalation regimens: scheduled discontinuations or switches to an oral treatment after single infusion cycles, scheduled discontinuations or switches to an oral treatment after periodic infusions, de-escalations before pregnancies, de-escalations after tolerance issues, and increased infusion intervals. Rituximab discontinuations motivated by inefficacy or for unknown purposes were excluded. The primary outcome was the absolute risk of NMOSD reactivation (one or more relapses) at 12 months. AQP4+ and AQP4- serotypes were analyzed separately., Results: We identified 137 rituximab de-escalations between 2006 and 2019 that corresponded to a predefined group: 13 discontinuations after a single infusion cycle, 6 switches to an oral treatment after a single infusion cycle, 9 discontinuations after periodic infusions, 5 switches to an oral treatment after periodic infusions, 4 de-escalations before pregnancies, 9 de-escalations after tolerance issues, and 91 increased infusion intervals. No group remained relapse-free over the whole de-escalation follow-up (mean: 3.2 years; range: 0.79-9.5), except pregnancies in AQP+ patients. In all groups combined and within 12 months, reactivations occurred after 11/119 de-escalations in patients with AQP4+ NMOSD (9.2%, 95% CI [4.7-15.9]), from 0.69 to 10.0 months, and in 5/18 de-escalations in patients with AQP4- NMOSD (27.8%, 95% CI [9.7-53.5]), from 1.1 to 9.9 months., Discussion: There is a risk of NMOSD reactivation whatever the rituximab de-escalation regimen., Trial Registration Information: Registered on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02850705., Classification of Evidence: This study provides Class IV evidence that de-escalation of rituximab increases the probability of disease reactivation., (© 2023 American Academy of Neurology.)

Background: In 2020, the French Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Society (SFSEP) decided to develop a national evidence-based consensus on pregnancy in MS. As neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) shares a series of commonalities with MS, but also some significant differences, specific recommendations had to be developed., Objectives: To establish recommendations on pregnancy in women with NMOSD., Methods: The French Group for Recommendations in Multiple Sclerosis (France4MS) reviewed PubMed and universities databases (January 1975 through June 2021). The RAND/UCLA appropriateness method, which was developed to synthesise the scientific literature and expert opinions on health care topics, was used to reach a formal agreement. Fifty-six MS experts worked on the full-text review and initial wording of recommendations. A sub-group of nine NMOSD experts was dedicated to analysing available data on NMOSD. A group of 62 multidisciplinary healthcare specialists validated the final proposal of summarised evidence., Results: A strong agreement was reached for all 66 proposed recommendations. They cover diverse topics, such as pregnancy planning, follow-up during pregnancy and postpartum, delivery routes, loco-regional analgesia or anaesthesia, prevention of postpartum relapses, breastfeeding, vaccinations, reproductive assistance, management of relapses, and disease-modifying treatments., Conclusion: Physicians and patients should be aware of the new and specific evidence-based recommendations of the French MS Society for pregnancy in women with NMOSD. They should help harmonise counselling and treatment practise, allowing for better individualised choices.

Introduction: Recent studies suggested that anti-CD20 and fingolimod may be associated with lower anti-spike protein-based immunoglobulin-G response following COVID-19 vaccination. We evaluated if COVID-19 occurred despite vaccination among patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and neuromyelitis optica (NMO), using the COVISEP registry., Case Series: We report 18 cases of COVID-19 after two doses of BNT162b2-vaccination, 13 of which treated with anti-CD20 and four with fingolimod. COVID-19 severity was mild., Discussion: These results reinforce the recommendation for a third COVID-19 vaccine dose among anti-CD20 treated patients and stress the need for a prospective clinical and biological study on COVID-19 vaccine efficacy among MS and NMO patients.

Background: Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) attacks require an urgent probabilistic anti-inflammatory therapeutic strategy. As inadequately treated attacks result in disability, there is a need to identify the optimal attack-treatment regimen. Our study aimed to identify predictors of outcome after a first attack in patients with an NMOSD presentation and propose the best treatment strategy., Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study on the French national NMOSD registry (NOMADMUS), a nested cohort of the French multiple sclerosis observatory (OFSEP) recruiting patients with NMOSD presentations in France. We studied the first attack for any independent locations of clinical core characteristic of NMOSD, in treatment-naïve patients. The primary outcome was the evolution of the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score at 6 months, stratified in two ways to account for recovery (return to baseline EDSS score) and treatment response (classified as "good" if the EDSS score decreased by ≥ 1 point after a nadir EDSS score ≤ 3, or by ≥ 2 points after a nadir EDSS score > 3). We used ordinal logistic regression to infer statistical associations with the outcome., Results: We included 211 attacks among 183 patients (104 with anti-AQP4 antibodies, 60 with anti-MOG antibodies, and 19 double seronegative). Attack treatment regimens comprised corticosteroids (n = 196), plasma exchanges (PE; n = 72) and intravenous immunoglobulins (n = 6). Complete recovery was reached in 40 attacks (19%) at 6 months. The treatment response was "good" in 134 attacks (63.5%). There was no improvement in EDSS score in 50 attacks (23.7%). MOG-antibody seropositivity and short delays to PE were significantly and independently associated with better recovery and treatment response., Conclusions: We identified two prognostic factors: serostatus (with better outcomes among MOG-Ab-positive patients) and the delay to PE. We, therefore, argue for a more aggressive anti-inflammatory management of the first attacks suggesting an NMOSD presentation, with the early combination of PE with corticosteroids., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: SARS-CoV-2 seroconversion rate after COVID-19 may be influenced by disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) or neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMO-SD)., Objective: To investigate the seroprevalence and the quantity of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in a cohort of patients with MS or NMO-SD., Methods: Blood samples were collected in patients diagnosed with COVID-19 between 19 February 2020 and 26 February 2021. SARS-CoV-2 antibody positivity rates and Ig levels (anti-S IgG titre, anti-S IgA index, anti-N IgG index) were compared between DMTs groups. Multivariate logistic and linear regression models were used to estimate the influence of DMTs and other confounding variables on SARS-CoV-2 serological outcomes., Results: 119 patients (115 MS, 4 NMO, mean age: 43.0 years) were analysed. Overall, seroconversion rate was 80.6% within 5.0 (SD 3.4) months after infection. 20/21 (95.2%) patients without DMT and 66/77 (85.7%) patients on DMTs other than anti-CD20 had at least one SARS-CoV-2 Ig positivity, while this rate decreased to only 10/21 (47.6%) for patients on anti-CD20 (p<0.001). Being on anti-CD20 was associated with a decreased odd of positive serology (OR, 0.07 (95% CI 0.01 to 0.69), p=0.02) independently from time to COVID-19, total IgG level, age, sex and COVID-19 severity. Time between last anti-CD20 infusion and COVID-19 was longer (mean (SD), 3.7 (2.0) months) in seropositive patients compared with seronegative patients (mean (SD), 1.9 (1.5) months, p=0.04)., Conclusions: SARS-CoV-2 antibody response was decreased in patients with MS or NMO-SD treated with anti-CD20 therapies. Monitoring long-term risk of reinfection and specific vaccination strategies in this population may be warranted., Trial Registration Number: NCT04568707., Competing Interests: Competing interests: Dr Louapre has received consulting or travel fees from Biogen, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Teva and Merck Serono, and research grant from Biogen, none related to the present work. Dr Ibrahim has no disclosure. Dr Maillart has received consulting and lecturing fees, travel grants, from Ad Scientiam, Biogen, Genzyme, Novartis, Merck Serono, Roche, Sanofi and Teva Pharma and research support from Biogen, Novartis and Roche, none related to the present work. Dr Abdi has no disclosure. Dr Papeix has received consulting or lecture fees from Alexion, Biogen, Medday, Merck, Roche, Novartis and Sanofi, none related to the present work. Professor Stankoff has received fees for advisory boards and lectures from Genzyme, Novartis, Teva and Biogen, and research support from Roche, Genzyme and Merck-Serono none related to the present work. Dr Dubessy has received consulting fees from Merck. Dr Bensa has received consulting or travel fees from Biogen, Genzyme, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Teva and Merck Serono, none related to the present work. Professor Creange has received grants and nonfinancial support from Medday, personal fees from Medday, personal fees from Merck, grants from Octapharma, grants and personal fees from Novartis, grants and personal fees from Roche, and grants and personal fees from Biogen, none related to the present work. Dr Chamekh has no disclosure. Professor Lubetzki has received grants and personal fees from Biogen, personal fees from Merck-Serono, personal fees from Roche, personal fees from Rewind, personal fees from Ipsen, none related to the present work. Professor Marcelin has received consulting fees and grants from VIIV Healthcare, Gilead and Merck, none related to the present work. Professor Corvol has served in advisory boards for Air Liquide, Biogen, Biophytis, Denali, Ever Pharma, Idorsia, Prevail Therapeutic, Theranexus, UCB, and received grants from Sanofi and the Michael J Fox Foundation, none related to the present work. Professor Pourcher has received consulting fees from Biogen, Novartis, Roche and Merck Serono none related to the present work., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objective: As phase III trials have shown interest in innovative but expensive drugs in the treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD), data are needed to clarify strategies in the treatment of neuromyelitis optica (NMO). This meta-analysis compares the efficacy of first-line strategies using rituximab (RTX), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), or azathioprine (AZA), which are still widely used., Methods: Studies identified by the systematic review of Huang et al. (2019) were selected if they considered at least two first-line immunosuppressants among RTX, MMF, and AZA. We updated this review. The Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, and ClinicalTrials databases were queried between November 2018 and April 2020. To be included, the hazard ratio (HR) [95% CI] for the time to first relapse after first-line immunosuppression had to be available, calculable, or provided by the authors., Results: We gathered data from 919 NMO patients (232 RTX-, 294 MMF-, and 393 AZA-treated patients). The risk of first relapse after first-line immunosuppression was 1.55 [1.04, 2.31] (p = 0.03) for MMF compared with RTX, 1.42 [0.87, 2.30] (p = 0.16) for AZA compared with RTX, and 0.94 [0.58, 1.54] (p = 0.08) for MMF compared with AZA., Interpretation: The findings suggest that RTX is more efficient than MMF as a first-line therapy. Even if the results of our meta-analysis cannot conclude that RTX has a better efficacy in delaying the first relapse than AZA, the observed effect difference between both treatments combined with the results of previous studies using as outcome the annualized relapse rate may be in favor of RTX., (© 2021 The Authors. Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Neurological Association.)

Background: Outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) or myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD), often treated with immunosuppressive therapies, are still unknown., Methods: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective, observational cohort study among all French expert centers for neuromyelitis optica and related disorders. Patients with NMOSD or MOGAD included in the study received a confirmed or highly suspected diagnosis of COVID-19 between 1 March 2020 and 30 June 2020. Main outcome was COVID-19 severity score assessed on a seven-point ordinal scale ranging from 1 (not hospitalized with no limitations on activities) to 7 (death)., Results: Fifteen cases (mean [SD] age: 39.3 [14.3] years, 11 female) were included. Five patients (33.3%) were hospitalized, all receiving rituximab. A 24-year-old patient with positive aquaporine-4 antibody, with obesity as comorbidity, needed mechanical ventilation. Outpatients were receiving anti-CD20 (5), mycophenolate mofetil (3) or azathioprine (3). They were younger (mean [SD] age: 37.0 [13.4] years), with a longer disease duration (mean [SD]: 8.3 [6.3] years) and had a lower expanded disability severity score (EDSS) score (median [range] EDSS: 2.5 [0-4]) relative to patients requiring hospitalization (mean [SD] age: 44.0 [16.4] years, mean [SD] disease duration: 5.8 [5.5] years, median [range] EDSS: 4 [0-6.5])., Conclusions: COVID-19 outcome was overall favorable in this cohort. Larger international studies are needed to identify risk factors of severe COVID-19; however, we recommend personal protective measures to reduce risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in this immunocompromised population., (© 2020 European Academy of Neurology.)

Objective: To analyze the effects of pregnancy on neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) according to patients' serostatus and immunosuppressive therapy (IST)., Methods: We performed a retrospective multicenter international study on patients with NMOSD. Patients were tested for aquaporin-4 (AQP4) and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) antibodies (Ab). Informative pregnancies were reported when NMOSD onset occurred before or during pregnancy or up to 12 months postpartum. The mean annualized relapse rate (ARR) was calculated for the 12 months before conception, for each trimester of pregnancy, and postpartum. Events such as miscarriage, abortion, and preeclampsia were reported. IST was considered if taken in the 3 months before or during pregnancy., Results: We included 89 pregnancies (46 with AQP4-Ab, 30 with MOG-Ab, and 13 without either Ab) in 58 patients with NMOSD. Compared to the prepregnancy period, the ARR was lower during pregnancy in each serostatus group and higher during the postpartum period in patients with AQP4-Ab ( p < 0.01). Forty-eight percent (n = 31) of pregnancies occurred during IST and these patients presented fewer relapses during pregnancy and the 12 months postpartum than untreated patients (26% vs 53%, p = 0.04). Miscarriages occurred in 10 (11%) pregnancies, and were mainly in patients with AQP4-Ab (with or without IST) and a previous history of miscarriage. Preeclampsia was reported in 2 (2%) patients who were AQP4-Ab-positive., Conclusion: We found a rebound in the ARR during the first postpartum trimester that was higher than the prepregnancy period only in AQP4-Ab-positive patients. Taking IST just before or during pregnancy reduces the risk of relapses in these conditions., (© 2021 American Academy of Neurology.)

Background and Purpose: Three different sets of criteria have been proposed for the diagnosis of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). The objective was to compare the specificity, sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy of the three different sets of NMOSD criteria in patients presenting with inflammatory disorders of the central nervous system suggestive of NMOSD., Methods: For 236 suspected NMOSD patients referred for serum aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin G antibody (AQP4-IgG) testing between 2012 and 2014, the three sets of NMOSD criteria [1999, 2006 NMO criteria and 2015 International Panel for NMO Diagnosis (IPND) criteria] were applied and compared to the final diagnosis., Results: Seventy-six patients fulfilled at least one set of criteria and 28 patients fulfilled all NMOSD sets of criteria. The final diagnosis was NMOSD in 66 cases, multiple sclerosis according to the MacDonald 2010 criteria in 85 cases and another diagnosis in 85 cases. The 2006 NMO criteria have the highest specificity (99%) and the 2015 IPND NMOSD criteria the highest sensitivity (97%). For the 1999, 2006 and 2015 IPND NMOSD criteria, the accuracy was respectively 82%, 87% and 97%., Conclusions: Our study highlights the limitations of the first set of criteria that include the optico-spinal form of multiple sclerosis. The accuracy of NMOSD diagnostic criteria improved from 1999 to 2015. It confirms the increased performance of the last set of criteria which covers a larger spectrum of clinical presentation. This study raises some concerns for classifying patients with seronegative transverse myelitis or optic neuritis, and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) antibody- associated disease., (© 2020 European Academy of Neurology.)

Objective: To assess the effect of anti-CD20 B-cell depletion with rituximab (RTX) on relapse rates in myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disorder (MOGAD)., Methods: Retrospective review of RTX-treated MOGAD patients from 29 centres in 13 countries. The primary outcome measure was change in relapse rate after starting rituximab (Poisson regression model)., Results: Data on 121 patients were analysed, including 30 (24.8%) children. Twenty/121 (16.5%) were treated after one attack, of whom 14/20 (70.0%) remained relapse-free after median (IQR) 11.2 (6.3-14.1) months. The remainder (101/121, 83.5%) were treated after two or more attacks, of whom 53/101 (52.5%) remained relapse-free after median 12.1 (6.3-24.9) months. In this 'relapsing group', relapse rate declined by 37% (95%CI=19-52%, p<0.001) overall, 63% (95%CI=35-79%, p = 0.001) when RTX was used first line (n = 47), and 26% (95%CI=2-44%, p = 0.038) when used after other steroid-sparing immunotherapies (n = 54). Predicted 1-year and 2-year relapse-free survival was 79% and 55% for first-line RTX therapy, and 38% and 18% for second-/third-line therapy. Circulating CD19 + B-cells were suppressed to <1% of total circulating lymphocyte population at the time of 45/57 (78.9%) relapses., Conclusion: RTX reduced relapse rates in MOGAD. However, many patients continued to relapse despite apparent B-cell depletion. Prospective controlled studies are needed to validate these results., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To compare the efficacy and the risk of severe infectious events of immunosuppressive agents used early as first-line therapy in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD)., Methods: We retrospectively included patients with NMOSD and a seropositive status for aquaporin 4 or myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies beginning first-line immunosuppressants within 3 years after the disease onset. The main outcome was occurrence of relapse after the initiation of immunosuppressants; the secondary outcome was the annual relapse rate (AAR)., Results: A total of 136 patients were included: 62 (45.6%) were treated with rituximab (RTX), 42 (30.9%) with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and 23 (16.9%) with azathioprine (AZA). Compared with RTX-treated patients, the risk of relapse was higher among MMF-treated patients (hazard ratio [HR], 2.74 [1.17-6.40]; p = 0.020) after adjusting for age at disease onset, sex, antibody status, disease duration, ARR before treatment, corticosteroid intake, and relapse location. We did not observe any difference between RTX-treated and AZA-treated patients (HR, 2.13 [0.72-6.28]; p = 0.17). No interaction was found between the antibody status and immunosuppressive treatments. ARR was lower with RTX than with MMF ( p = 0.039), but no difference was observed with AZA. We observed 9 serious infectious events with MMF, 6 with RTX, and none with AZA., Conclusions: The use of first-line RTX in NMOSD appears more effective than MMF in suppressing clinical activity, independent of the antibody status., Classification of Evidence: That study provides Class III evidence that for patients with NMOSD, first-line RTX is superior to MMF to reduce the risk of relapse., (© 2020 American Academy of Neurology.)

The identification of AQP4-IgG, a specific and pathogenic antibody of NMO/SD has led to a broadening of the clinical spectrum of manifestations of NMO/SD including the presence of encephalic symptoms. Lesions are often distributed on peri‑ependymal area and sometimes affected the diencephalon leading to sleep disorders. We report a case of hypersomnia with polysomnographic documentation during the first attack of NMO/SD. Brain MRI revealed bilateral hypothalamic lesions around the third ventricle, whereas optic nerves and spinal cord were intact. The record of the nocturnal video-polysomnography followed by multiple sleep latency tests (MSLT) revealed an abnormal shortened sleep period with a single sleep onset in REM allowing secondary central hypersomnia diagnosis. The recovery of hypersomnia was complete within few months without psychostimulant treatment and the diencephalic lesion disappeared. Thus, diencephalic form of NMO/SD seems to cause narcolepsy or non-narcoleptic central hypersomnia and have a good recovery., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interests Authors and co-Authors have no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies (MOG-Ab) are related to several acquired demyelinating syndromes in adults, but the therapeutic approach is currently unclear. We aimed to describe the response to different therapeutic strategies in adult patients with relapsing MOG-Ab-associated disease., Methods: This is a retrospective study conducted in France and Spain including 125 relapsing MOG-Ab patients aged ≥ 18 years. First, we performed a survival analysis to investigate the relapse risk between treated and non-treated patients, performing a propensity score method based on the inverse probability of treatment weighting. Second, we assessed the annualised relapse rates (ARR), Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and visual acuity pre-treatment and on/end-treatment., Results: Median age at onset was 34.1 years (range 18.0-67.1), the female to male ratio was 1.2:1, and 96% were Caucasian. At 5 years, 84% (95% confidence interval [CI], 77.1-89.8) patients relapsed. At the last follow-up, 66 (52.8%) received maintenance therapy. Patients initiating immunosuppressants (azathioprine, mycophenolate mophetil [MMF], rituximab) were at lower risk of new relapse in comparison to non-treated patients (HR, 0.41; 95CI%, 0.20-0.82; p = 0.011). Mean ARR (standard deviation) was reduced from 1.05(1.20) to 0.43(0.79) with azathioprine (n = 11; p = 0.041), from 1.20(1.11) to 0.23(0.60) with MMF (n = 11; p = 0.033), and from 1.08(0.98) to 0.43(0.89) with rituximab (n = 26; p = 0.012). Other immunosuppressants (methotrexate/mitoxantrone/cyclophosphamide; n = 5), or multiple sclerosis disease-modifying drugs (MS-DMD; n = 9), were not associated with significantly reduced ARR. Higher rates of freedom of EDSS progression were observed with azathioprine, MMF or rituximab., Conclusion: In adults with relapsing MOG-Ab-associated disease, immunosuppressant therapy (azathioprine, MMF and rituximab) is associated with reduced risk of relapse and better disability outcomes. Such an effect was not found in the few patients treated with MS-DMD.

There is growing evidence of a preventive effect of Rituximab (RTX) in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMO-SD). This monoclonal antibody against CD20 is becoming the most widely used preventive therapy in NMO-SD, as a first-line therapy or as a rescue therapy. Nevertheless, considerable heterogeneity still exists concerning the pre-treatment work-up, the vaccinations required before and under treatment, the number and dosage of infusions, prevention of the risk of infusion-related reactions, prevention of infections under treatment, and frequency of therapeutic cycles. Thanks to a collaborative work among NMO-SD experts belonging to the NOMADMUS project, we provide here recommendations for all these topics concerning RTX use in NMO-SD., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: We report a dramatic clinical and radiological worsening within two months after rituximab initiation in a patient with NeuroMyelitis Optica/Multiple Sclerosis (NMO/MS) overlap syndrome., Methods: Case study., Results: A 45-year-old Caucasian woman with NMO/MS overlap syndrome experienced a severe myelitis nine weeks after first rituximab infusion, with extensive new gadolinium-enhanced spinal cord lesions., Conclusion: This case report illustrates the limits of MS and NMO-Spectrum Disorder classification and challenges the criteria of therapeutic failure within the 6 months after rituximab initiation., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Despite a growing use of rituximab (RTX) in neuromyelitis optica (NMO), data are lacking in patients with refractory NMO (RNMO), defined as cases with at least one relapse during immunosuppressive therapy., Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess RTX as a maintenance therapy in RNMO., Methods: Out of a total of 305 NMO cases from a population-based cohort, 21 RNMO patients received RTX during a mean follow-up period of 31 months., Results: After RTX, 11 patients (52.3%) were relapse free, meaning that 47.7% were refractory to RTX. The mean annualized relapse rate decreased from 1.3 to 0.4 (p<0.001) and median EDSS from 5 to 3 (p=0.02). Body mass index (BMI) was predictive of EDSS worsening., Conclusions: RTX is an effective and well-tolerated treatment in RNMO. BMI could be a predictive factor for efficacy., (© The Author(s), 2015.)