Search

BACKGROUND Astrocytomas are a subset of diffuse gliomas defined by intact 1p and 19q arms. Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 mutations (mIDH-1) occur in ~70% of grade 2/3 gliomas, leading to accumulation of 2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG). Vorasidenib (VOR) is an oral, brain-penetrant dual inhibitor of mIDH1/2 enzymes being investigated in a phase 3 study in non-enhancing gliomas. In an ongoing perioperative study in grade 2/3 gliomas, treatment with VOR was associated with interferon (IFN) signaling activation and increased T-cell infiltration, suggesting adequate 2-HG suppression renders the tumor immune microenvironment for immune checkpoint blockade, and supporting investigation of VOR in combination with an anti-programmed cell death (PD-1) antibody such as pembrolizumab in recurrent IDH-mutant gliomas treatment. This study will evaluate the safety and tolerability of VOR plus pembrolizumab to determine the recommended combination dose (RCD) of VOR, and evaluate CD3+ T-cell infiltration in tumors following preoperative treatment with the combination or VOR. METHODS This study will enroll ~70 patients with recurrent or progressive Grade 2/3 mIDH-1 astrocytoma. Key eligibility: enhancing disease, mIDH1-R132H, Karnofsky Performance Status ≥70, eligible for resection (perioperative phase only). Safety lead-in: Cohort 1 (Nf~6): VOR 40 mg QD plus pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W in 21-day cycles. Based on DLT evaluation, cohort 2 may enroll an additional ~6 patients at VOR 20 mg QD plus pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W. Randomized, perioperative phase (Nf~60): randomized 1:1:1 to the combination, VOR 40 mg QD, or untreated for 4 weeks preoperatively; all patients can opt to receive the combination postoperatively. Primary objectives: safety and tolerability, and VOR RCD with pembrolizumab; CD3+ T-cell infiltration in resected tumors following presurgical treatment with the combination compared to untreated tumors. Secondary objectives include clinical activity, VOR PK in tumor and blood, 2-HG concentration in tumors, and overall survival. This study will be active in the United States.

BACKGROUND EGFR is amplified in over 50% of glioblastoma and 20-30% have EGFRvIII mutations. Neratinib is a potent inhibitor of EGFR/HER2 approved for metastatic HER2+ breast cancer. To efficiently evaluate the potential impact of neratinib on overall survival (OS) in newly-diagnosed glioblastoma and to simultaneously develop information regarding potential genomic biomarker associations, neratinib was included as an arm on the Individualized Screening Trial of Innovative Glioblastoma Therapy (INSIGhT) trial. INSIGhT is a phase II platform trial using response adaptive randomization and deep genomic profiling to more efficiently test experimental agents in MGMT unmethylated glioblastoma and accelerate identification of novel therapies for phase III testing. Initial randomization was equal between neratinib, control, and two other experimental arms but subsequent randomization was adapted based on efficacy as determined by progression-free survival (PFS). We report preliminary results for the neratinib arm. METHODS Patients with newly diagnosed MGMT-unmethylated glioblastoma were randomized to receive either radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide or standard radiochemotherapy followed by adjuvant neratinib (240 mg daily). Treatment continued until progression or development of unacceptable toxicities. The primary endpoint was OS. Association between neratinib efficacy and EGFR amplification was also investigated. RESULTS There were 144 patients (70 control; 74 neratinib). Neratinib was reasonably well-tolerated with no new toxicity signals identified. PFS was compared (HR 0.84; p=0.38, logrank test – not significant) between the neratinib (median 6.05 months) and control (median 5.82 months) arms. For patients EGFR pathway activation the PFS HR was 0.53 (p-value=0.03 – significant, median PFS: neratinib, 6.21 months, control, 5.26 months). However, there was no significant improvement in OS in EGFR amplified/mutated patients (HR 1.05; p-value 0.87) between neratinib (median 14.2) compared to the control arm (median 14.6). CONCLUSION Neratinib prolonged PFS in the EGFR positive subpopulation but there was no overall PFS benefit, or any OS improvement.

BACKGROUND H3 K27M-mutant diffuse midline glioma is an invariably lethal form of brain cancer that disproportionately affects children and young adults and has no effective treatment following front-line radiation. The initial disease definition in the 2016 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System regarded the H3 K27M mutation as pathognomonic, though the definition was updated in 2018 restricting the diagnosis to histologically diffuse gliomas that involve midline CNS structures (cIMPACT-NOW update 2). ONC201 is an investigational anti- cancer small molecule, DRD2 antagonist and ClpP agonist that has induced durable tumor regressions by RANO-HGG criteria in a registration cohort of recurrent diffuse midline glioma, H3 K27M-mutant patients treated with single agent ONC201. METHODS We present 7 patients with H3 K27M-mutant diffuse gliomas were enrolled in ONC201 clinical studies, excluded from the registration cohort due to involvement of non-midline CNS structures, all within the cerebral hemispheres (3 frontal, 1 temporal, 1 frontotemporal, 1 parietal, and 1 corona radiata). RESULTS Two of the 7 patients underwent objective responses by RANO-HGG criteria as assessed by investigator, which was associated with clinical benefit that included increased mobility and level of alertness. CONCLUSIONS These results demonstrate that H3 K27M-mutant diffuse gliomas occur outside of midline CNS structures, and suggest that ONC201 has single agent activity in H3 K27M-mutant gliomas irrespective of CNS location.

BACKGROUND: The outcome for glioblastoma (GBM) remains dismal with a median survival of 15 months. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a highly upregulated proangiogenic growth factor in GBM that contributes to tumor-associated immunosuppression by inhibition of dendritic cell maturation and antigen presentation, induction of apoptosis of CD8+ T cells and enhancing Treg activity. Hence, a combination of anti PD1 and anti VEGF is promising approach in recurrent GBM. Lower anti-VEGF therapy dosing can lead to enhanced immune infiltrate and improved survival following co-administration with an anti-tumor immunotherapeutic in preclinical studies. METHODS: This is a 90 patient randomized phase 2 open label study of nivolumab plus standard dose bevacizumab versus nivolumab plus low dose bevacizumab in recurrent GBM. Primary endpoint is to evaluate the efficacy of nivolumab when administered with standard and reduced dose bevacizumab as measured by overall survival (OS) at twelve months (OS-12). Secondary endpoint include safety, Progression free survival at 6 months, OS and overall response rate. Exploratory endpoints include circulating immunologic biomarkers, cytokines, archival tumor PD-L1 expression and inflammatory gene expression signature and perfusion and diffusion weighted imaging with response (RANO and iRANO). Eligibility Criteria include Age ≥ 18 years, first recurrence of GBM, normal organ function, KPS ≥ 70. Key exclusion criteria include active, known or suspected autoimmune disease, contraindications for bevacizumab therapy and decadron > 4 mg/ day or equivalent of steroids. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The one-sample log-rank test will be applied to outcomes observed for each arm individually to test the hypothesis that OS has been improved beyond the null 12-month survival rate of 45%. With N=45 patients per arm, a one-sided test provides power=0.80 to detect survival rate of 58% at 12-months following treatment at the 0.10 significance level. RESULTS: The study (NCT03452579) is ongoing and enrolling GBM patients in first recurrence.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 9%-18% of LGGs possess BRAF V600E mutations. Combined BRAF and MEK inhibition is efficacious in BRAF V600–mutated melanoma, lung cancer, and anaplastic thyroid cancer. Dabrafenib (BRAF inhibitor) + trametinib (MEK inhibitor) was evaluated as treatment for patients with recurrent/refractory BRAF V600E–mutated LGG. METHODS: In this phase 2, open-label trial (NCT02034110), patients with BRAF V600E mutations in 9 rare tumor types, including LGG, received continuous dabrafenib (150 mg BID) + trametinib (2 mg QD) until unacceptable toxicity, disease progression, or death. For the LGG cohort, eligible patients had histologically confirmed recurrent or progressive WHO grade 1 or 2 glioma that was refractory to standard-of-care therapies. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed overall response rate (ORR) by RANO criteria. Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS: Nine patients with LGG had enrolled at data cutoff (3 January 2018). Eight of 9 patients were evaluable for response. Median age was 33 years. Eight of 9 patients had received prior surgery. Investigator-assessed confirmed ORR was 50% (4/8; 95% CI, 16%-84%), with 3 of 4 responses ongoing at data cutoff. Two of 4 patients had a DOR of ≥ 18 months. The PFS and OS Kaplan-Meier estimates at 18 months were 50% (95% CI, 15%-78%) and 86% (95% CI, 33%-98%), respectively. Adverse events (AEs) in patients with LGG included fatigue (67%), headache (67%), arthralgia, nausea, and pyrexia (56% each). Grade 3/4 AEs included fatigue (22%), arthralgia, headache, and diarrhea (11% each). Biomarker analyses are ongoing and will be presented. CONCLUSIONS: Dabrafenib + trametinib demonstrated promising efficacy in patients with recurrent/refractory BRAF V600E-mutated LGG, with manageable AEs and no new safety signals

BACKGROUND: VB-111 is an anti-angiogenic agent consisting of a non-replicating adenovirus vector (Ad-5) with a modified murine pre-proendothelin promoter leading to apoptosis of tumor vasculature by expressing a fas-chimera transgene in angiogenic endothelial cells. Safety and efficacy of VB-111 alone and in combination with bevacizumab (BEV) were evaluated for patients with recurrent Glioblastoma (rGBM) in this phase 1-2 dose-escalation study. METHODS: VB-111 was administered as a single intravenous infusion at escalating doses from 1x1012 to 1x1013 viral particles (VPs), followed by repeat doses of 3x1012 or 1x1013 every 2 months. The protocol was amended to add-on BEV 10mg/Kg every 2 weeks upon further progression. Assessments included safety, pharmacokinetics, tumor response (RANO criteria) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Forty-six patients at 4 recruiting medical centers in the US and Israel received up to 13 repeat doses of VB-111. Of these 30 received the high dose (1x1013). There were 22 related adverse events, 19 CTCAE grade 1-2. The median OS was 360 [range: 70-574] and 266 days [range: 28-664] for patients receiving at least one high dose vs. subjects who received lower doses, respectively (p NS). Progression free survival was 63 vs. 55 days for patients who received high vs. lower doses, respectively (p = 0.01). Median follow-up was 232 days. Six patients had a partial response and/or prolonged disease stability (≥180 days). Tumor growth rates showed a statistically significant dose response. Eleven patients received combination therapy of VB-111 with BEV after progression on VB-111 alone. Median time to second progression was 93 days. VB-111 was safe and well tolerated both as monotherapy and combined therapy. CONCLUSIONS: VB-111 was safe and well tolerated as monotherapy and in combination with BEV in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Encouraging tumor growth attenuation and responses were seen. Overall survival was about 3 months longer than historical rGBM data.