Search

Introduction: Recent retrospective literature suggests that the quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) scoring tool is a potentially superior tool over use of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria to predict septic shock after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) surgery. Here we examine use of qSOFA and SIRS to predict septic shock within data series collected prospectively on PCNL patients as part of a greater study of infectious complications. Materials and Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of two prospective multicenter studies including PCNL patients across nine institutions. Clinical signs informing SIRS and qSOFA scores were collected no later than postoperative day 1. The primary outcome was sensitivity and specificity of SIRS and qSOFA (high-risk score of greater-or-equal to two points) in predicting admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) for vasopressor support. Results: A total of 218 cases at 9 institutions were analyzed. One patient required vasopressor support in the ICU. The sensitivity/specificity was 100%/72.4% (McNemar's test p  < 0.001) for SIRS and was 100%/90.8% (McNemar's test p  < 0.001) for qSOFA. Conclusion: Although positive predictive value for both qSOFA and SIRS in prediction of post-PCNL septic shock is low, prospectively collected data demonstrate use of qSOFA may offer greater specificity than SIRS criteria when predicting post-PCNL septic shock.

Background: Residual fragments (RFs) after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) have a significant impact on patients' quality of life and clinical course. There is a paucity of studies that evaluate the natural history of RFs after PCNL. The objective of this study is to compare rates of reintervention, complications, stone growth, and passage in patients with RFs >4, ≤4, and ≤2 mm after PCNL. Methods: Sites from the Endourologic Disease Group for Excellence (EDGE) research consortium examined data of PCNL patients from 2015 to 2019 with at least 1-year follow-up. RF passage, regrowth, reintervention, and complications were recorded and RFs were stratified into >4 and ≤4 mm groups, as well as >2 and ≤2 mm groups. Potential predictors for stone-related events after PCNL were determined using multivariable logistic regression analysis. It was hypothesized that larger RF thresholds would result in lower passage rates, faster regrowth, and greater clinically significant events (complications and reinterventions) than smaller RF thresholds. Results: A total of 439 patients with RFs >1 mm on CT postoperative day 1 were included in this study. For RFs >4 mm, rates of reintervention were found to be significantly higher and Kaplan-Meier curve analysis showed significantly higher rates of stone-related events. Passage and RF regrowth were not found to be significantly different compared with RFs ≤4 mm. However, RFs ≤2 mm had significantly higher rates of passage, and significantly lower rates of fragment regrowth (>1 mm), complications, and reintervention compared with RFs >2 mm. On multivariable analysis, older age, body mass index, and RF size were found to be predictive of stone-related events. Conclusions: With the largest cohort to date, this study by the EDGE research consortium further confirms that clinically insignificant residual fragment is problematic for patients after PCNL, particularly in older more obese patients with larger RFs. Our study underscores the importance of complete stone clearance post-PCNL and challenges the use of Clinically insignificant residual fragment (CIFR).

Purpose: Treatment of struvite kidney stones requires complete surgical stone removal combined with antibiotic therapy to eliminate urinary tract infections and preventive measures to reduce stone recurrence. The optimal duration of antibiotic therapy is unknown. We sought to determine if 2- or 12-weeks of antibiotics post percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) for infection stones resulted in better outcomes for stone recurrence and positive urine cultures., Material and Methods: This multi-center, prospective randomized trial evaluated patients with the clinical diagnosis of infection stones. Patients were randomized to 2- or 12-weeks of postoperative oral antibiotics (nitrofurantoin or culture-specific antibiotic) and included if residual fragments were ≤4 mm on computed tomography imaging after PNL. Imaging and urine analyses were performed at 3-, 6-, and 12-months post-procedure., Results: Thirty-eight patients were enrolled and randomized to either 2-weeks (n = 20) or 12-weeks (n = 18) of antibiotic therapy post-PNL. Eleven patients were excluded due to residual fragments >4 mm, and 3 patients were lost to follow-up. The primary outcome was the stone-free rate (SFR) at 6 months post-PNL. At 3-, 6-, and 12-months follow-up, SFRs were 72.7% versus 80.0%, 70.0% versus 57.1%, 80.0% versus 57.1% (p = ns), between 2- and 12-week-groups, respectively. At 3-, 6-, and 12-months follow-up, positive urine cultures were 50.0% versus 37.5%, 50.0% versus 83.3%, and 37.5% versus 100% between 2- and 12-week groups, respectively (p = ns)., Conclusions: For patients with stone removal following PNL, neither 2-weeks nor 12-weeks of postoperative oral antibiotics is superior to prevent stones and recurrent positive urine cultures., (© 2022 The Japanese Urological Association.)

Purpose: Postoperative infectious related complications are not uncommon after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Previously, we noted that 7 days of antibiotics did not decrease sepsis rates compared to just perioperative antibiotics in a low risk percutaneous nephrolithotomy population. This study aimed to compare the same regimens in individuals at moderate to high risk for sepsis undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy., Materials and Methods: Patients were prospectively randomized in this multi-institutional study to either 2 days or 7 days of preoperative antibiotics. Enrolled patients had stones requiring percutaneous nephrolithotomy and had either a positive preoperative urine culture or existing indwelling urinary drainage tube. Primary outcome was difference in sepsis rates between the groups. Secondary outcomes included rate of nonseptic bacteriuria, stone-free rate and length of stay., Results: A total of 123 patients at 7 institutions were analyzed. There was no difference in sepsis rates between groups on univariate analysis. Similarly, there were no differences in nonseptic bacteriuria, stone-free rate and length of stay. On multivariate analysis, 2 days of antibiotics increased the risk of sepsis compared to 7 days of antibiotics (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.1-8.9, p=0.031). Patients receiving antibiotics for 2 days had higher rates of staghorn calculus than the 7-day group (58% vs 32%, p=0.006) but post hoc subanalysis did not demonstrate increased sepsis in the staghorn only group., Conclusions: Giving 7 days of preoperative antibiotics vs 2 days decreases the risk of sepsis in moderate to high risk percutaneous nephrolithotomy patients. Future guidelines should consider infectious risk stratification for percutaneous nephrolithotomy antibiotic recommendations.

Purpose: Splenic injury is a rare complication after left-sided percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Although initial observation is often espoused, the natural history of nonoperative conservative management is not well established and the implications of splenic injury are not fully defined in this context. We sought to describe outcomes of conservative management of splenic injury incurred at PCNL. Patients and Methods: We performed a multi-institutional retrospective review of individual patients who underwent PCNL complicated by trans-splenic nephrostomy access injury. Demographic info, intraoperative data, management strategies, and outcomes were reviewed. Results: Nine patients suffered splenic injury after left PCNL. All patients had supracostal upper pole access under fluoroscopic guidance. Splenic injury was identified by computed tomography (CT) in the eight of nine (89%) who had imaging on first postoperative day. All eight patients were managed conservatively with nephrostomy dwell time of 2-21 days, one of whom (11%) required blood transfusion. The remaining patient (11%)-who had tubeless PCNL without postoperative imaging presented 5 days postoperatively with a delayed bleed and underwent emergent splenectomy. Seven of the nine (78%) were managed nonoperatively and without need for transfusion or embolization. Conclusion: The majority of patients incurring splenic injury during PCNL can be managed conservatively with maintenance of nephrostomy tube for ≥2 days. Consequences of unrecognized splenic injury may include splenic bleed and may prompt transfusion and/or splenectomy, underscoring role of routine postoperative CT to allow timely diagnosis, particularly in those undergoing upper pole supracostal left-sided percutaneous renal access.

Purpose: Single institution studies suggest a benefit of a week of preoperative antibiotics prior to percutaneous nephrolithotomy. These studies are limited by lower quality methodology, such as the inclusion of heterogeneous populations or nonstandard definitions of sepsis. The AUA (American Urological Association) Best Practice Statement recommends less than 24 hours of intravenous antibiotics but to our knowledge no other data exist on the duration or benefit of preoperative antibiotics. Using CONSORT (Consolidated Reporting of Trials) guidelines we sought to perform a rigorous multi-institutional trial to assess preoperative antibiotics in patients in whom percutaneous nephrolithotomy was planned and who were at low risk for infection., Materials and Methods: This randomized controlled trial enrolled patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy who were at low risk, defined as negative preoperative urine cultures and no urinary drain. Of the subjects 43 were randomized to nitrofurantoin 100 mg twice daily for 7 days preoperatively while a control arm of 43 received no oral antibiotics. All subjects received perioperative doses of ampicillin and gentamicin. Prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy was performed by urologists blinded to randomization. The primary outcome was the development of sepsis., Results: A total of 86 subjects were enrolled. Preoperative patient characteristics were similar in the treatment and control cohorts with a stone size of 19 and 17 mm, respectively (p = 0.47). Intraoperative characteristics also did not differ. The sepsis rate was not statistically different between the treatment and control groups (12% and 14%, respectively, 95% CI -0.163-0.122, p = 1.0). Other infectious parameters and complications were similar, including intensive care admission, fever, hypotension and leukocytosis., Conclusions: Our study demonstrated no advantage to providing 1 week of preoperative oral antibiotics in patients at low risk for infectious complications who undergo percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Perioperative antibiotics according to the AUA Best Practice Statement appear sufficient., (Copyright © 2018 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To compare the efficiency (stone fragmentation and removal time) and complications of three models of intracorporeal lithotripters in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL)., Materials and Methods: Prospective, randomized controlled trial at nine centers in North America from 2009 to 2016. Patients were randomized to one of three lithotripter devices: the Cyberwand, a dual-probe ultrasonic device; the Swiss Lithoclast Select, a combination pneumatic and ultrasonic device; and the StoneBreaker, a portable pneumatic device powered by CO 2 cartridges. Since the StoneBreaker lacks an ultrasonic component, it was used with the LUS-II ultrasonic lithotripter to allow fair comparison with combination devices., Results: Two hundred seventy patients were enrolled, 69 were excluded after randomization. Two hundred one patients completed the study: 71 in the Cyberwand group, 66 in the Lithoclast Select group, and 64 in the StoneBreaker group. The baseline patient characteristics of the three groups were similar. Mean stone surface area was smaller in the StoneBreaker group at 407.8 mm 2 vs 577.5 mm 2 (Lithoclast Select) and 627.9 mm 2 (Cyberwand). The stone clearance rate was slowest in the StoneBreaker group at 24.0 mm 2 /min vs 28.9 mm 2 /min and 32.3 mm 2 /min in the Lithoclast Select and Cyberwand groups, respectively. After statistically adjusting for the smaller mean stone in the StoneBreaker group, there was no difference in the stone clearance rate among the three groups (p = 0.249). Secondary outcomes, including complications and stone-free rates, were similar between the groups., Conclusions: The Cyberwand, Lithoclast Select, and the StoneBreaker lithotripters have similar adjusted stone clearance rates in PCNL for stones >2 cm. The safety and efficacy of these devices are comparable.