Search

Objectives: To report the outcomes and feasibility of active surveillance (AS) of biopsy-proven renal oncocytomas., Methods: Multicentric retrospective study (2010-2016) in 6 academic centers that included patients with biopsy-proven renal oncocytomas who were allocated to AS (imperative or elective indication) with a follow-up ≥1 year. Imaging was performed at least once a year, by CT-scan or ultrasound or MRI. Conversion to active treatment (surgical excision or ablative treatment) was at the discretion of the urologist. The primary endpoint was renal tumor growth (cm/year). Secondary outcomes included accuracy of biopsy, incidence, and reason to change AS to active treatment., Results: Eighty-nine patients were included: Median age 67 years (26-89) and median tumor size 26 mm [15-90] on diagnosis. During a mean follow-up of 43 months'' (median 36 [12-180]), mean tumor growth was 0.24 cm/year. No predictive factors (demographical, radiological or histologic) of tumor growth could be identified. Conversion from AS to active treatment occurred in 24 patients (27%) (13 surgical excisions, 11 ablative procedures), in a median time of 45 (12-76) months'' after diagnosis. Tumor growth was the main indication to convert AS to active treatment (58%) with 8% of the patients opting to discontinue AS. No patient had metastatic progression nor disease-specific death. The correlation between biopsy and surgical specimen was 92%., Conclusion: Active surveillance for biopsy-proven renal oncocytomas was oncologically safe and patient adherence was high. No predictive factor for tumor growth could be identified but the tumor growth rate was low, and biopsy efficacy was high., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: We evaluated the feasibility and outcomes of immediate preoperative renal artery embolization (IPRAE) before complex nephrectomy for locally advanced RCC ± inferior vena cava thrombus (IVCT)., Methods: A comparative retrospective (2007-2017) multicenter study which included 145 patients with locally advanced RCC ± IVCT: 99 radical nephrectomies vs. 46 radical nephrectomies with IPRAE identified in the prospective UroCCR national database (CNIL DR 2013-206; NCT03293563). IPRAE was performed under local anesthesia the day of nephrectomy (< 4 h prior to nephrectomy). The primary endpoint was peroperative blood loss (mL). Secondary outcomes were: tolerance of embolization (pain visual scale), success rate of IPRAE defined by complete devascularization of the kidney, perioperative complications according to Clavien score and postoperative GFR., Results: The baseline characteristics of IPRAE and the control groups were similar. Tumor staging was 14% T2b, 41% T3a, 27% T3b, 13% T3c, 6% T4. The success rate of IPRAE was 98%. Median artery embolizated per patient was 2 (Agochukwu and Shuch in World J Urol 32:581-589, 2014; Marshall et al. in J Urol 139:1166-1172, 1988; Yap et al. in BJU Int 110:1283-1288, 2012;Gill et al. in J Urol. 194:929-938, 2015; Wang et al. in Eur Urol 69:1112-1119, 2016). No severe complications occurred after IPRAE. Postembolization syndrome was reported in 7% (Clavien I-II). Mean peroperative blood losses in the IPRAE and control groups were: 726 ± 118 ml and 1083 ± 114 ml (P = 0.03). In a multivariate analysis that included: age, Karnofsky index, IPRAE (yes vs. no), IVCT (yes vs. no), tumor size and synchronous metastasis, no IPRAE and IVCT were significantly associated with increased peroperative bleeding., Conclusion: IPRAE before nephrectomy for locally advanced and/or IVCT tumors was well tolerated, was associated with lower peroperative bleeding and did not increase the incidence or severity of postoperative complications.

Objective: To evaluate the renal function outcomes after selective trans-arterial embolization (SAE) of iatrogenic vascular lesions (IVL), including pseudoaneurysm and arteriovenous fistula, following partial nephrectomy (PN)., Materials and Methods: A multi-institutional study was conducted including consecutive patients who underwent PN between January 2009 and March 2019. Two surgical approaches were used: open and robot-assisted PN. Patients with SAE were identified and matched (1:2) with patients without IVL. The matching criteria were age, gender, Charlson score, creatinine clearance, RENAL score, and tumor size. The primary outcome was the evolution of global renal function at 6-months postoperatively., Results: A total of 493 consecutive PN (360 open PN and 133 robot-assisted PN) were included. IVL occurred in 17 cases (3.4%) without statistical difference according to the surgical approach (P = .78). Patients from embolization group were matched to 34 cases without postoperative IVL. Groups were comparable concerning clinical, tumor and surgical characteristics. The clinical success of SAE, defined as the absence of recourse to a second embolization or a total nephrectomy, was obtained in 16 (94.1%) cases. No minor or major complications were reported after SAE. The preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was similar between control group (93 [85-102] ml/min) and embolization group (95 [83-102] ml/min) (P = .99). Median (IQR) eGFR between control group (87 [72-95] ml/min) and embolization group (83 [76-93] ml/min) at a follow-up of 6 months showed no significant difference (P = .73)., Conclusion: IVL are rare complications of PN. SAE is an effective and minimally invasive management tool, with no deleterious effect on global renal function., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction and Objective: Definitive inclusion of renal mass biopsy (RMB) in small renal mass (SRM) diagnostic algorithm remains controversial. We assessed incidence and accuracy of RMB in SRMs in the CROES Renal Mass registry and the influence of preoperative RMB on perioperative complications after SRM nephron-sparing surgery (NSS). Materials and Methods: " ad hoc " description of incidence of preoperative RMB and characteristics of SRM cases with and without RMB. Accuracy of RMB was calculated in the SRM subcohort that received extirpative treatment and complication rate after NSS compared to between the two groups. Continuous variables were compared using t -test; categorical variables were compared using the chi-square test. K-statistics was used to analyze agreement between the biopsy histology and surgical pathology. Logistic regression was used to assess the association between RMB and NSS complications. All tests were two sided, and p -values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: The rate of preoperative RMB in SRMs was 11.6% (175/1597) in Europe and the United States. RMB patients were more likely to have hypertension ( p  < 0.04), be on dialysis ( p  < 0.024), or smokers ( p  = 0.005), with multiple/bilateral tumors (0.008 and 0.010) and previous other malignancy ( p  = 0.021). They underwent radical nephrectomy more frequently than non-RMB group ( p  = 0.034). RMB was nondiagnostic in 16 cases (9%). Accuracy of RMB in distinguishing malignant from benign was 89.5%. Agreement between biopsy and final surgical pathology was 93% for malignant vs benign tumors (kappa = 0.655). Upstaging to pT3a occurred more frequently in the RMB group (12.6% vs 6.25% [ p  = 0.022]). Complication rate in renal mass-NSS subcohort was 15.8%, not statistically different between RMB and non-RMB groups. On logistic regression analysis, RMB was not associated with increased risk of postoperative complication after NSS (OR: 0.9, 95% CI: 0.43-1.89). Conclusion: The practice of RMB in SRM is still scarce despite high accuracy and concordance with final pathology. RMB does not seem to increase complication rate after NSS.

Background: Cytoreductive nephrectomy has been the standard of care in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma for 20 years, supported by randomized trials and large, retrospective studies. However, the efficacy of targeted therapies has challenged this standard. We assessed the role of nephrectomy in patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma who were receiving targeted therapies., Methods: In this phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, patients with confirmed metastatic clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma at presentation who were suitable candidates for nephrectomy to undergo nephrectomy and then receive sunitinib (standard therapy) or to receive sunitinib alone. Randomization was stratified according to prognostic risk (intermediate or poor) in the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center prognostic model. Patients received sunitinib at a dose of 50 mg daily in cycles of 28 days on and 14 days off every 6 weeks. The primary end point was overall survival., Results: A total of 450 patients were enrolled from September 2009 to September 2017. At this planned interim analysis, the median follow-up was 50.9 months, with 326 deaths observed. The results in the sunitinib-alone group were noninferior to those in the nephrectomy-sunitinib group with regard to overall survival (stratified hazard ratio for death, 0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.71 to 1.10; upper boundary of the 95% confidence interval for noninferiority, ≤1.20). The median overall survival was 18.4 months in the sunitinib-alone group and 13.9 months in the nephrectomy-sunitinib group. No significant differences in response rate or progression-free survival were observed. Adverse events were as anticipated in each group., Conclusions: Sunitinib alone was not inferior to nephrectomy followed by sunitinib in patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma who were classified as having intermediate-risk or poor-risk disease. (Funded by Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris and others; CARMENA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00930033 .).

Objectives: The role of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in the treatment of patients harboring metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has become controversial since the emergence of effective targeted therapies. The aim of our study was to compare the overall survival (OS) between CN and non-CN groups of patients presenting with mRCC in the era of targeted drugs and to assess these outcomes among the different Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) and The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status subgroups., Methods and Materials: A total of 351 patients with mRCC at diagnosis recruited from 18 tertiary care centers who had been treated with systemic treatment were included in this retrospective study. OS was assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method according to the completion of a CN. The population was subsequently stratified according to MSKCC and ECOG prognostic groups., Results: Median OS in the entire cohort was 37.1 months. Median OS was significantly improved for patients who underwent CN (16.4 vs. 38.1 months, P<0.001). However, subgroup analysis demonstrated that OS improvement after CN was only significant among the patients with an ECOG score of 0 to 1 (16.7 vs. 43.3 months, P = 0.03) and the group of patients with good and intermediate MSKCC score (16.8 vs. 42.4 months, P = 0.02). On the contrary, this benefit was not significant for the patients with an ECOG score of 2 to 3 (8.0 vs. 12.6 months, P = 0.8) or the group with poor MSKCC score (5.2 vs. 5.2, P = 0.9)., Conclusions: CN improves OS in patients with mRCC. However, this effect does not seem to be significant for the patients in ECOG performance status groups of 2 to 3 or poor MSKCC prognostic group., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To assess the influence of vascular clamping and ischemia time on long-term post-operative renal function following partial nephrectomy (PN) for cancer in a solitary kidney., Patients and Methods: This is a retrospective study including 259 patients managed by PN between 1979 and 2010 in 13 centers. Clamping use, technique choice (pedicular or parenchymal clamping), ischemia time, and peri-operative data were collected. Pre-operative and last follow-up glomerular filtration rates were compared. A multivariate analysis using a Cox model was performed to assess the impact of ischemia on post-operative chronic renal failure risk., Results: Mean tumor size was 4.0±2.3cm and mean pre-operative glomerular filtration rate was 60.8±18.9mL/min. One hundred and six patients were managed with warm ischemia (40.9%) and 53 patients with cold ischemia (20.5%). Thirty patients (11.6%) have had a chronic kidney disease. In multivariate analysis, neither vascular clamping (P=0.44) nor warm ischemia time (P=0.1) were associated with a pejorative evolution of renal function. Pre-operative glomerular filtration rate (P<0.0001) and blood loss volume (P=0.02) were significant independent predictive factors of long-term renal failure., Conclusion: Renal function following PN in a solitary kidney seems to depend on non-reversible factors such as pre-operative glomerular filtration rate. Our findings minimize the role of vascular clamping and ischemia time, which were not significantly associated with chronic renal failure risk in our study., Level of Evidence: 5., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To assess the risk factors of metastasis relapse in pT2-3 upper tract urothelial carcinomas (UTUCs) treated by radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) without lymphadenectomy (LN)., Methods: A multicentric retrospective study was performed for pT2-3 pNx UTUCs treated by RNU between 1995 and 2010. The following criteria were retrieved: age, gender, American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status, surgical approach, preoperative hydronephrosis, stage, grade, tumor location, surgical margin, lymphovascular invasion (LVI) status and outcomes. Metastasis-free survival (MFS) was measured by Kaplan-Meier method with the log-rank test., Results: Overall, 151 patients were included. The median follow-up was 18.5 months (IQR 9.5-37.9). The 2- and 5-year MFS were 69 % ± 4.5 and 54.1 % ± 5.8, respectively. In univariate analysis, ureteral location, pT3 stage, positive LVI status and positive surgical margin were significantly associated with worse MFS (p = 0.03; 0.02; 0.01 and 0.006, respectively). In the multivariate analysis of ureteral location and pT3 stage were independent prognostic factors (p = 0.03 and 0.03, respectively). Based on the results of the univariate analysis, we proposed a risk model predicting MFS, which classifies patients into 3 categories with different overall survival (p < 0.001)., Conclusion: In view of our data, tumor location, T stage, LVI and surgical margin status are mandatory to predict survival in case of RN without LN. Contingent upon external validation, our risk model based on these variables could be useful to provide relevant information concerning metastasis relapse probability and necessity of close follow-up for these patients.

Objective: Partial Nephrectomy (PN) in a solitary kidney is at risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage V and/or haemodialysis (HD). Our objective was to determine predictive factors of CKD stage V in this population., Material & Methods: Data from 300 patients were retrospectively collected from 16 tertiary centres. Clinical and operative parameters, tumor characteristics and renal function before surgery were analyzed. Patients with and without CKD stage V (defined as MDRD<1 5 ml/min) were compared using χ2 and Student-t tests for qualitative and quantitative variables, respectively. Predictive factors of CKD stage V were evaluated with a multivariable analysis using a Cox regression model., Results: Median age and BMI were 63 years old and 26 kg/m², respectively. Most of the patients (65%) were male with an anatomic solitary kidney (88.3%). Median tumor size was 4 cm and 98% were malignant tumors. Median operative time, blood loss and clamping time were 180 min, 350 ml and 20 min respectively. Renal cooling was used in 19.3% and clamping of the pedicle was performed in 61.6%. Twenty five patients (8.5%) presented post operative CKD stage V at last follow-up and 18 underwent HD (6%) post-operatively because of acute renal insufficiency. There was no difference between CKD stage V and non CKD stage V patients concerning Charlson index, operative time (180 min vs 179 min, p = 0.39), blood loss (475 ml vs 350 ml, p = 0.51), use of renal cooling and type of clamping. Patients with CKD stage V were older (70 vs 63 years old, p = 0.005), had a lower baseline renal function (clearance MDRD 41 vs. 62 ml/min, p<0.0001) and an increased tumor size (p = 0.02). Complications occurred in 91 patients (30%) with 16% of minor (Clavien 1-2) and 14% of major (Clavien > 2) complications, respectively. In multivariable analysis, baseline MDRD, BMI, and the occurrence of a minor complication were independent predictive factors of post operative CKD stage V., Conclusion: PN in a solitary kidney is at risk of post-operative CKD stage V and HD. Pre-operative altered renal function and post operative complications are the main predictive factors of permanent CKD stage V., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To evaluate the results of partial nephrectomy (NP) for cancer in 60 patients selected by the biopsy of the tumor by analyzing the information, oncologic follow-up., Patients: It was a cohort study unicenter retrospective from 1994 to 2006. The biopsy was systematically done for patients who were candidates for elective NP. The criteria for elective indications NP tumors were less than 4cm, low grade Fuhrman (I and II). The tubulopapillary tumors (TBP) on biopsy were excluded from the elective indications. The parameters studied were the biopsy data, overall survival, disease-free survival., Results: The median age was 59 years (32-79 years) and 69% of tumor were fortuitous discovery. Indications of need accounted for 30% of cases (single kidney, bilateral tumors and chronic renal failure [CRF]). Biopsy allowed a diagnosis in 89% of cases. There was one death in specific postoperative immediately. A final histology was 75% of clear cell carcinoma, 13.3% of chromophobe and 11.7% of TBP, 96.6% of T1a including 86.6% of low grade and no surgical margin. The median follow-up was 49 months with 98.5% of specific survival at 5 years, one local recurrence and no general recurrence., Conclusion: The study has shown that the selection of patients by biopsy gives satisfactory carcinologic results with 98.5% specific survival at the end of follow-up; it is between 89 and 100% in the literature., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Conditional survival implies that on average long-term cancer survivors have a better prognosis than do newly diagnosed individuals. We explored the effect of conditional survival in renal cell carcinoma., Materials and Methods: We studied 3,560 patients with renal cell carcinoma of all stages treated with nephrectomy. We applied conditional survival methodology to a previously reported posttreatment nomogram predicting survival after nephrectomy for patients with renal cell carcinoma stage I to IV. We used the same predictor variables that were integrated in the original multivariable Cox regression models, namely TNM stage, Fuhrman grade, tumor size and symptom classification. To validate the conditional survival nomogram we used an independent cohort of 3,560 patients from 15 institutions., Results: The 5-year survival of patients immediately after nephrectomy was 74.2%, which increased to 80.4%, 85.1%, 90.6% and 89.6% at 1, 2, 5 and 10 years after nephrectomy, respectively. The predicted probabilities varied by as much as 50% when, for example, predictions of renal cell carcinoma specific mortality at 10 years were made after nephrectomy vs 5 years later. Within the external validation cohort the accuracy of the conditional nomogram was 89.5%, 90.5%, 88.5% and 86.7% at 1, 2, 5 and 10 years after nephrectomy., Conclusions: We developed (2,530) and externally validated (3,560) a conditional nomogram for predicting renal cell carcinoma specific mortality that allows consideration of the length of survivorship. Our tool provides the most realistic prognosis estimates with high accuracy.

Objectives: To compare cancer-specific mortality in patients with unclassified renal cell carcinoma (URCC) vs clear cell RCC (CRCC) after nephrectomy, as URCC is a rare but very aggressive histological subtype., Patients and Methods: Eighty-five patients with URCC and 4322 with CRCC were identified within 6530 patients treated with either radical or partial nephrectomy at 18 institutions. Of 85 patients with URCC, 55 were matched with 166 of 4322 for grade, tumour size, and Tumour, Node and Metastasis stages. Kaplan-Meier and life-table analyses were used to address RCC-specific survival. Subsequently, multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to test for differences in RCC-specific survival in unmatched samples., Results: Of patients with URCC, 80% had Fuhrman grades III or IV, vs 37.8% for CRCC. Moreover, 36.5% of patients with URCC had pathologically confirmed nodal metastases, vs 8.6% with CRCC. Finally, 54.1% of patients with URCC had distant metastases at the time of nephrectomy, vs 16.8% with CRCC. Despite these differences in the overall analyses, after matching for tumour characteristics, the URCC-specific mortality rate was 1.6 times higher (P = 0.04) in matched analyses and 1.7 times higher (P = 0.001) in multivariate analyses., Conclusions: These findings indicate that URCC presents with a higher stage and grade, and even after controlling for the stage and grade differences, predisposes patients to 1.6-1.7 times the mortality of CRCC.

Objectives: Multicentre study of the Transplantation Committee of the Association Française d'Urologie (French Urology Association) concerning the attitudes of various French transplantation centres in relation to renal transplantectomy., Methods: Nine centres participated in this study: Bordeaux, Brest, Grenoble, Marseille, Nantes, Paris-Necker, Paris-La Pitié, Strasbourg and Toulouse. The survey was performed by means of 2 types of forms: study of transplantectomies performed between 1982 and 1992, specific study of transplantectomies performed in 1992., Results: From 1982 to 1992, 731 transplantectomies were performed in these centres, i.e. 15% of all renal transplantations. Rejection represented 80% of the indications and vascular complications represented 15%. The technique used before the 6th week was complete removal of the transplant. After this period, the transplant was removed via a subcapsular approach. The postoperative mortality was 0.7% and the morbidity was 26%. In 1992, 91 transplantectomies were performed in these different centres. Forty-two per cent of the transplants presented with local signs and 38% with general signs. A subcapsular transplantectomy was performed in 84% of cases, for rejection in every case. The morbidity was 16%. Complete removal of the transplant was performed in 16% of cases, essentially for infectious complications. The morbidity was 7%., Conclusion: The renal transplantectomy technique must be adapted to the interval after transplantation: before the 6th week, the transplant must be completely removed; after this period, subcapsular transplantectomy must be performed. This operation therefore no longer carries the mortality and morbidity attributed to it.

Actuellement le CCAFU recommande de réaliser une biopsie rénale dans des situations bien spécifiques (avant surveillance, traitement ablatif, traitement systémique chez le patient M+, doute diagnostic) et plus globalement chaque fois que la biopsie est susceptible de modifier la prise en charge. Nous avons mené une revue bibliographique Pubmed sur la performance diagnostique et les complications de la biopsie de tumeur rénale. La biopsie rénale est un examen fiable, sûr et performant pour la caractérisation des tumeurs du rein, avec un niveau de preuve scientifique élevée. Les sensibilités et spécificité de la biopsie pour la détermination de la malignité/bénignité sont ainsi de 99,1 % de 99,7 % au prix d'une morbidité faible. Plusieurs études récentes rapportent que la biopsie tumorale modifie de façon significative la prise en charge thérapeutique des petites masses rénales en particulier, et dans une moindre mesure des tumeurs localement avancées, la biopsie ayant pour conséquence la diminution des chirurgies pour tumeur bénigne. Dans cette revue nous faisons le point sur la technique de biopsie et son intérêt potentiel pour les petites masses, les tumeurs > 7 cm et les tumeurs métastatiques. Currently the CCAFU recommends performing a renal biopsy in very specific situations (before surveillance, ablative treatment, systemic treatment in metastatic patient, undetermined tumor) and more generally when the biopsy is likely to change the management. We performed a review on Pubmed dealing with the diagnostic accuracy and complication of renal tumor biopsy. Renal biopsy is a reliable, safe and effective technic for the characterization of renal tumors, with a high level of evidence. The sensitivity and specificity of the biopsy for the determination of the malignancy/benignity are 99.1% of 99.7% respectively. Recent studies reported that tumor biopsy significantly modified the therapeutic management of small renal masses in particular, and to a lesser extent locally advanced tumors, the biopsy resulting in the reduction of benign tumor surgeries. In this review we propose a state of the art on the technique of biopsy and its potential interest for small renal masses, tumors > 7 cm and metastatic tumors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]