Search

Poor diet quality (diet diversity and animal‐source food [ASF] consumption) during childhood negatively affects growth, development, behaviour and physiologic function in later life. Relatively less is known about the impact of poor diet on the growth of school‐age children compared to children <5 years of age, especially in low/middle‐income countries. A better understanding of delivery strategies for effective interventions to improve diet and hence growth in school‐age children is needed. A 36‐month longitudinal controlled impact evaluation in rural Nepal assessed the nutrition and growth of children <5 years of age in families assigned via community clusters to full package intervention (community development, training in nutrition [during pregnancy and for children <5 years] and livestock husbandry), partial package (training only) or control (no inputs). Concurrent data were collected prospectively (baseline plus additional four rounds) on school‐age children (5–8 years at baseline) in these households; the present study analysed findings in the cohort of school‐age children seen at all five study visits (n = 341). Diet quality improved more in the full package school‐age children compared to those in partial package or control households. full package children consumed more ASF (β +0.40 [CI 0.07,0.73], p < 0.05), more diverse diets (β +0.93 [CI 0.55,1.31], p < 0.001) and had better head circumference z‐scores (β +0.21 [CI 0.07,0.35], p < 0.01) than control children. In conclusion, a multi‐sectoral community development intervention was associated with improvements in diet and growth of school‐age children in rural Nepal even though the intervention focused on the diet of children <5 years of age. The diet and growth of school‐age children can be favourably influenced by community‐level interventions, even indirectly. Key messages: Relatively less is known about the factors that influence diet quality and growth in school‐age children compared to younger children, especially in low‐ and middle‐income countries.Better diet quality and growth were found among school‐age children whose families participated in an impact study multi‐sectoral intervention compared to children in control families or those whose families only received nutrition training.Diet and growth of school‐age children can be favourably influenced by community‐level interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To compare the impact on child diet and growth of a multisectoral community intervention v. nutrition education and livestock management training alone.Design: Longitudinal community-based randomized trial involving three groups of villages assigned to receive: (i) Full Package community development activities, delivered via women's groups; (ii) livestock training and nutrition education alone (Partial Package); or (iii) no intervention (Control). Household surveys, child growth monitoring, child and household diet quality measures (diet diversity (DD), animal-source food (ASF) consumption) were collected at five visits over 36 months. Mixed-effect linear regression and Poisson models used survey round, treatment group and group-by-round interaction to predict outcomes of interest, adjusted for household- and child-specific characteristics.Setting: Banke, Nepal.Participants: Households (n 974) with children aged 1-60 months (n 1333).Results: Children in Full Package households had better endline anthropometry (weight-for-age, weight-for-height, mid-upper-arm-circumference Z-scores), DD, and more consumption of ASF, after adjusting for household- and child-specific characteristics. By endline, compared with Partial Package or Control groups, Full Package households demonstrated preferential child feeding practices and had significantly more improvement in household wealth and hygiene habits.Conclusions: In this longitudinal study, a comprehensive multisectoral intervention was more successful in improving key growth indicators as well as diet quality in young children. Provision of training in livestock management and nutrition education alone had limited effect on these outcomes. Although more time-consuming and costly to administer, incorporating nutrition training with community social capital development was associated with better child growth and nutrition outcomes than isolated training programmes alone. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Economic growth and poverty reduction are not always sufficient to improve child health and nutritional status.Heifer Internationalpromotes livestock introduction and related training for community development and poverty alleviation. These programmes do not directly address child health or nutrition. To determine effects of its activities on these important outcomes,Heiferconducted a 4-year longitudinal investigation in rural Nepal. The intervention was associated with significantly improved child anthropometry (related to the duration of intervention exposure) and child health.Heiferactivities represent a viable ‘nutrition sensitive’ intervention, but these impacts take time to manifest and be sustained. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Background: Brain development in early childhood is a key determinant of later cognition, social achievement and educational success. Head circumference (HC) measurements are a simple method to assess brain growth, yet reports of these measurements are uncommon in nutritional surveys of undernourished children. Objective: To evaluate HC measurements in a population of rural Nepali children and relate these measurements to demographics, health and diet. Methods: An observational study of head growth was nested within a longitudinal evaluation of a livestock-based agricultural intervention in rural Nepal. Between 538 and 689 children (aged 6 months to 8 years) were measured (height, weight, HC) at each of six survey visits. A total of 3652 HC measurements were obtained. Results were converted toZ-scores (WHO Anthro). Results: Mean head circumferenceZ-scores (HCZ) diminished progressively over the first 4 years of life; a decline of 30% occurred between 3 and 4 years of age (−1.73 to −2.45,P < 0.0001). Overall, 56% of HCZ were <−2. Gender-adjusted HCZ (but not other measurements) were significantly lower for girls than boys [mean (SD) −2.31 (1.0)vs−1.99 (0.094),P < 0.0001]; girls more often had microcephaly (61%vs50%,P < 0.0001). For children <3 years of age, HCZ were better in those who had eaten two or more animal-source foods (ASFs) within the previous 24 h [−1.69 (.05)vs−2.08 (0.10),P = 0.001] than in those who had eaten none or only one; HCZ correlated with the number of ASFs consumed (P < 0.001). Regression analyses demonstrated that the main determinants of HCZ were age, weight-for-ageZ-scores (WAZ) and gender; 43% of the variance in HCZ in younger children was explained by WAZ and ASF consumption. Conclusion: HCs reflect brain size in young children; brain size is linked to cognitive function. Poor head growth represents another facet of the ‘silent emergency’ of child undernutrition. Routine HCZ assessments may contribute to better understanding of the links between poverty and cognitive development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Child undernutrition afflicts >150 million children worldwide, contributing to poor child growth, increased risk of infections, and loss of developmental potential. Animal-source foods (ASF) can ameliorate these problems by providing high-quality, high-density, and bioavailable protein and micronutrients. However, many children in developing countries lack ASF in their diet, although generally milk is the ASF most often consumed. Nevertheless, the relation of ASF—and that of specific ASF—to child growth in these contexts has been difficult to define, as has the association between diet and child and household factors in influencing growth outcomes. To better understand these relationships, we evaluated child growth by age groups (6–23 mo, 24–60 mo, and >60 mo) in relation to ASF consumption in rural Nepal. We used an observational study design that leveraged a data set generated through a 3-yr longitudinal controlled impact evaluation of a communitydevelopment intervention. Child anthropometry and 24-h diet recall were obtained at 5 household visits. At baseline, children were generally undernourished: 47% were stunted, 46% underweight, 17% wasted, and 24% microcephalic. Patterns of undernutrition varied with age but improved somewhat over time. Over the 3-yr period of study (9,283 observations), ASF were consumed infrequently: milk in 28% of assessments, meat in 27%, and eggs in 15%. Consumption patterns differed by age group, with younger children (6–23 mo) consuming more milk and less meat than children 24 to 60 or >60 mo. Consumption of even a single ASF at any of the 5 surveys was associated with greater growth in bivariate analysis. After adjustment for household (group assignment, survey round and its interaction, wealth, income, livestock and land ownership, maternal education) and child factors (age, sex, baseline anthropometry), mixed-effect linear regression analysis showed that milk consumption related to higher height for age and weight for age z-scores for children >60 mo of age and to higher head circumference z-score for children age 24 to 60 mo. For children >60 mo, egg consumption also related to higher weight z-scores. Household and child factors also influenced these outcomes. Of the ASF, milk had the strongest and most consistent relationship to child growth. Better measures of diet intake could reveal stronger associations between diet consumption patterns and child growth. Regardless, milk may be a key ASF to target for growth promotion among undernourished rural Nepali children. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Nutrition-sensitive agricultural interventions have the potential to improve child dietary quality in rural households, as evidenced by a growing body of work which concurrently measures agricultural and nutrition indicators. Our objective was to investigate whether children in rural farming communities of Nepal participating in a community-level, nutrition-sensitive development intervention had improved dietary quality compared with children living in non-participating matched rural communities. Six rural communities of Nepal where livelihoods were predominantly agricultural were selected to participate in the phased implementation of a community-level development intervention by Heifer International . Households and children in each community were surveyed at baseline, and follow-up surveys were implemented every six months for twenty-four months. Detailed data on food consumption for children older than 6 months of age were collected using a 24 h recall for 17 foods and food groups; parents responded for children. A difference-in-differences model with household fixed-effects and an analysis of covariance model were used to analyze the resulting panel data. Results indicated that the impacts of the intervention varied by agro-ecological region and by season. In the Hills region, which is poorer on average and more conducive to livestock production, children who had received the intervention for two years were 2.2 times as likely to have consumed food from an additional food group, 1.27 times as likely to have achieved minimum dietary diversity and 1.38 times as likely to have consumed animal source foods as children who received the intervention for only one year. In the Terai region, which is more conducive to crop production, there was no significant change in dietary quality attributable to the intervention. These results provide evidence that particularly vulnerable families can take advantage of community-level development activities. Given that the effects of community-level development activities were disparate across communities within the same country, we conclude that tailoring development activities for particular locations is necessary for success. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]