Search

Major improvements have been seen in oncofertility care over the last decade. Clinical ethics frameworks support new populations, including children, having access to novel fertility preservation techniques. Oncofertility consultation requires a multidisciplinary approach. Clinicians need to develop competencies in infertility risk-assessment, counseling regarding fertility preservation procedures and alternate family planning options, and managing individualised supportive care needs to minimize medical and psychological morbidity., Competing Interests: Disclosure Y.L. Jayasinghe is funded by the Royal Children's Hospital Foundation, Melbourne Australia; and a Medical Research Future Fund MRFAR000308., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Fertility restoration potential of immature testicular tissue (ITT) depends on the number of spermatogonial cells in the retrieved tissue prior to cryopreservation in oncofertility programme. There are limited data on the association between type of malignancy and testicular germ cell population. Hence, this study is aimed to investigate the spermatogonial and Sertoli cell population in ITT retrieved from 14 pre-pubertal boys who opted for fertility preservation. Histopathological and immunochemical analysis of seminiferous tubules from haematological ( N  = 7) and non-haematological ( N  = 7) malignant patients revealed 3.43 ± 2.92 and 1.71 ± 1.81 spermatogonia per tubular cross section (S/T), respectively. The Sertoli cell number was comparable between haematological and non-haematological group (18.42 ± 3.78 and 22.03 ± 10.43). Spermatogonial quantity in ITT did not vary significantly between haematological and non-haematological cancers. This observation, though preliminary, would contribute to the limited literature on paediatric male oncofertility.

Purpose: Prior to cancer treatment, patients make decisions on whether to undergo fertility preservation (FP) and the method of FP. We sought to learn more about counseling and decision-making on the method of cancer-related FP., Methods: A cross-sectional 26-item online survey was administered to patients with ovaries who underwent cancer-related FP. Associations between demographics and the FP method were made through estimates of risk difference, with a 95% confidence interval. Open-ended responses were analyzed using the constant comparative method., Results: A total of 240 respondents completed the survey: 52% underwent oocyte cryopreservation (OC), 29% underwent embryo cryopreservation (EC), and 19% underwent both oocyte and embryo cryopreservation (OC/EC). Most respondents agreed that if they were to go through the process again, they would make the same decision about FP (80% EC, 72% OC, 59% OC/EC). Women ≥ 35 years reported being counseled more that embryos were superior compared to younger women (risk difference 46%, CI 32.8, 59.1), however were not more likely to freeze embryos (risk difference 6.2%, CI - 9.8, 22.2). Women in long-term relationships reported they were counseled more that embryos were superior compared to those single/dating (risk difference 27%, CI 18.1, 35.9). All women in long-term relationships reported undergoing EC, while the majority of single/dating women reported undergoing OC (74.6%)., Conclusion: Most women who have undergone cancer-related FP reported they would choose the same FP method again. Women in long-term relationships or ≥ 35 years reported they were more likely to be counseled that EC is superior; however, only women in long-term relationships were more likely to freeze embryos., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: In recent years, Iran has witnessed a remarkable increase in the incidence of cancer. This has led to an emerging challenge in the field of oncofertility, which seeks to address the impact of cancer treatments on fertility and endeavors to preserve reproduction. The study assessed healthcare providers' awareness, attitudes, and practices regarding fertility preservation (FP) in Iran., Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted to assess healthcare providers' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding oncofertility. An online self-made oncofertility survey of twenty-four items was administered to randomly selected participants from a list of healthcare providers registered with the Medical Council. The data were collected anonymously via Google Forms. Descriptive statistics, including number (n), prevalence (%), mean, and standard deviation, were calculated using SPSS 26.0. Additionally, chi-square tests were used to examine associations between categorical variables. Participants were categorized into oncology, obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN), and other specialties., Results: A total of 423 responses were received and analyzed. Approximately 60% of the participants were obstetrics and gynecology subspecialists, while the remaining participants represented various disciplines such as surgery (9.7%), radiotherapy (6.4%), nuclear medicine (5.2%), and pediatrics (1.4%). More than 30% of the participants had not received any specific education about oncofertility, and more than 20% stated that FP strategies are not part of their routine treatment plan for young cancer patients. Oncologists had more education than those in the Obstetrics & Gynecology group. Half the participants were unaware of insurance coverage, and FP options were infrequently recommended., Conclusions: These findings highlight the urgent need to enhance healthcare workers' knowledge and attitudes toward FP in Iran and enable them to provide comprehensive support and guidance to cancer patients., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: Although fertility preservation for patients with childhood and adolescent cancer is considered standard of care in the high-resource settings, it is rarely offered in low-resource settings. This study explores the experiences and perspectives of oncology health care professionals in Uganda to identify contextual barriers and facilitators to addressing oncofertility in low-resource settings. Methods: Using ground theory, we conducted in-depth face-to-face interviews of health care professionals managing pediatric patients at the Uganda Cancer Institute (UCI). Using a systematic, semi-structured interview guide, participants were asked open-ended questions about their understanding of fertility preservation and their perspectives on implementing this care at their institution. Although all the eligible health care providers were interviewed, interview transcripts were uploaded into NVivo version 12 and openly coded as per theoretical requirements. Codes were refined into categories and later into structured themes. Results: Twelve health care professionals were interviewed. Most participants identified as female ( n = 9). Their role in the medical team varied from nurses ( n = 6), medical officers ( n = 3), pediatric oncologists ( n = 2), and pediatric oncology fellow ( n = 1). Six themes were noted as follows: (1) importance of information, (2) importance of future fertility, (3) inadequate consideration to future fertility, (4) communication barriers, (5) inadequate knowledge, and (6) resource barriers. Conclusion: Although health care providers at the UCI face contextual barriers to addressing future fertility among patients with pediatric cancer, they value preserving fertility in this population. Future initiatives that aim to introduce oncofertility care in low-resource settings should prioritize educating providers and building capacity to meet the oncofertility needs in this setting.

Purpose: To examine the impact of financial costs on fertility preservation decisions among female young adults (YAs) with cancer. Methods: Female YAs ( N  = 18; aged 21-36) with a history of cancer and oncology providers ( N  = 12) were recruited from an National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center in a state without insurance coverage for fertility preservation. YAs and providers completed individual interviews and a brief online assessment. Qualitative description using thematic analysis was used to identify, analyze, and report common themes. Descriptive statistics was used to characterize the sample. Results: Female YAs and oncology providers highlighted the critical role that high out-of-pocket costs play in YAs' fertility preservation decisions along with the value that enhanced insurance coverage for fertility preservation would have for increasing female YAs' access to and utilization of fertility preservation. Although providers were concerned about preservation costs for their patients, they reported that their concerns did not impact whether they referred interested female YAs to reproductive specialists. Oncology providers expressed concern about inequities in utilization of fertility preservation for female and racially/ethnically minoritized YAs that were exacerbated by the high out-of-pocket fertility preservation costs. Conclusion: Cost is a significant barrier to fertility preservation for female YA cancer patients. Female YAs of reproductive age may benefit from decision support tools to assist with balancing the cost of fertility preservation with their values and family building goals. Policy-relevant interventions may mitigate cost barriers and improve access to care.

Treatment for childhood solid tumors may lead to an increased risk for gonadal dysfunction/infertility. Discussion of risk should occur at diagnosis, any changes in therapy, and during survivorship. Gonadotoxic therapies were abstracted from 32 Children's Oncology Group (COG) phase III, frontline solid tumor protocols, in use from 2000 to 2022. Risk for gonadal dysfunction/infertility was assessed based on gonadotoxic therapies, sex, and pubertal status and assigned as minimal, significant, and high following the Oncofertility Consortium Pediatric Initiative Network (PIN) risk stratification. Most protocols (65.6%, 21/32) contained at least one therapeutic arm with a high level of increased risk. Solid tumor therapies present challenges in risk stratification due to response-adjusted therapy and the need to account for radiation field in the risk assessment. This guide hopes to serve as a tool to assist in standardizing gonadotoxic risk assessments across disciplines and improve referral for fertility services and reproductive health counseling for patients receiving COG-based solid tumor therapy. Internationally, many solid tumor therapies follow similar paradigms to COG studies, and risk stratifications may be generalizable to similar styles of therapy. In addition, this model may be applied to other international groups with the goal of standardizing fertility assessments., (© 2024 The Authors. Pediatric Blood & Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the association between fertility issues and demographic characteristics of unmarried adolescent and young adult cancer survivors. Methods: We conducted a survey among cancer survivors who were 15-39 years old and unmarried at the time of cancer diagnosis and 20-45 years old at the time of the survey. Views on fertility issues, originally developed based on the results of a qualitative study conducted with the same inclusion criteria, were used to assess thoughts and feelings regarding fertility issues. Results: Through exploratory factor analysis of the 128 respondents who either had children or desired children, two factors related to fertility issues were identified: "anxiety related to the possibility of not being able to have children" and "pressure from others to have children." Multiple regression analysis was performed to examine the association between these factors and demographic characteristics. The analysis revealed that being male and having a partner were significant predictors for both factors for views on fertility issues. Additionally, younger age at the time of diagnosis was a significant predictor for the first factor. Conclusions: Greater fertility issues among unmarried cancer survivors were associated with younger age at diagnosis, having a partner, and being male. Surprisingly, contrary to previous findings, male cancer survivors experienced more significant fertility problems than women. This result may be attributed to the well-established gender roles in Japan, where men are predominantly considered the heirs and inheritors of the family.

Objective: To examine whether female cancer survivors are more likely to pursue care for infertility after cancer than women without cancer., Design: Population-based cohort study involving detailed interviews regarding reproductive history., Setting: Not applicable., Patients: Female cancer survivors aged 22-45 years, who were at least 2 years after a cancer diagnosis between the ages of 20 and 35 years (n = 1,036), and age-matched comparison women with no cancer history (n = 1,026)., Exposure: History of cancer vs. no history of cancer., Main Outcome Measure(s): Each cancer survivor was randomly matched to a comparison woman, who was assigned an artificial age at cancer diagnosis equal to that of her match. Matching was repeated 1,000 times. Outcomes of visiting a doctor for help becoming pregnant or undergoing fertility treatment were modeled using Cox proportional hazards regression, comparing survivors after a cancer diagnosis to age-matched comparison women, adjusted for race, income, residence, education, and parity., Results: Only 25.5% of cancer survivors reported meeting their desired family size before a cancer diagnosis. The median time from diagnosis to interview among survivors was 7 (interquartile range 5-11) years. Cancer survivors were more likely to report having no children (32.6%) at the interview compared with women with no cancer history (19.5%). Survivors were not more likely to visit a doctor for help becoming pregnant compared with women without a cancer history, matched on birth year and followed by the age at which cancer survivors received their diagnosis (hazard ratio [HR] 1.16, 95% simulation interval [SI] 0.78-1.74). Compared with cancer-free women, cancer survivors had similar probabilities of pursuing any treatment (adjusted HR [aHR] 0.88, 95% SI 0.46-1.56), using hormones or medications (aHR 0.86, 95% SI 0.46-1.63), or undergoing intrauterine insemination (aHR 1.26, 95% SI 0.40-5.88) to conceive. Cancer survivors were slightly more likely to pursue surgical interventions to become pregnant (HR 1.55, 95% SI 0.67-3.71). Of those who visited a doctor but declined to pursue fertility treatment, one-quarter of women reported declining treatment due to cost., Conclusion: Cancer survivors did not use fertility treatments at higher rates than the general population. Further counseling and education surrounding fertility options are recommended for young adult female cancer patients after treatment is completed., Competing Interests: Declaration of Interests L.M.K. has nothing to disclose. L.M.S. reports funding from the National Institute of Health Loan Repayment Program Award Recipient and travel support from the Pacific Coast Reproductive Specialists Scholarship Award Recipient outside the submitted work. A.C.M. reports funding from A Population-Based Study of Fertility in Female Survivors of Young Adult Cancer (Furthering Understanding of Cancer, Health, and Survivorship In Adult Women—FUCHSIA) NIH/NICHD R01 HD066059 PI: Penelope Howards, Ph.D., Epidemiology, Emory University for the submitted work; funding from Reproductive Health of Young Adult Women Who Have Sickle Cell Disease NICHD 1R21HD103030 (PI Penelope Howards) and Sickle Cell Post Transplantation Long Term and Late Effects Registry (STELLAR) NIH/NHLBI OT2HL152762-01 (PI Lakshmanan Krishnamurthi) outside the submitted work. J.B.S. reports funding from A Population-Based Study of Fertility in Female Survivors of Young Adult Cancer (Furthering Understanding of Cancer, Health, and Survivorship In Adult Women— FUCHSIA) NIH/NICHD R01 HD066059 PI: Penelope Howards, Ph.D., Epidemiology, Emory University, for the submitted work; funding from Impact of fertility status on epigenetic indicators of future health risk NICHD 1R21HD110847-01 (PI Anna Knight), DNA methylation differences underlying female reproductive aging 1KO1AG078497-01A1 (PI Anna Knight), Mapping the follicular fluid exposome for environmental determinants of infertility Hercules Pilot Award (PI Anna Knight), Reproductive Health of Young Adult Women Who Have Sickle Cell Disease NICHD 1R21HD103030 (PI Penelope Howards); travel support from AAOGF Donald Schwartz Travel Award for the annual meeting of The American Gynecological and Obstetrical Society (AGOS) and ABOG examiner and subject matter expert; leadership roles Jewish Fertility Foundation, medical advisory council Chair, 2018−2022, Menopause and Ovarian Insufficiency Special Interest Group (MOISIG), American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) 2019−2023 leadership, Patient Education Committee, American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) Chair, 2022-present outside the submitted work. P.P.H. reports funding from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Grant 1R01HD066059 for the submitted work., (Copyright © 2023 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Cancer is a life-threatening event for pediatric patients. Treatment advancements in pediatric cancer have improved prognosis, but some of these treatments have gonadotoxic potential and may affect fertility in different ways. Due to the growing interest of the research community in the life prospects of young cancer survivors, there has been a demand to intersect reproductive medicine and oncology, which is referred to as "oncofertility". There are various fertility preservation options according to gender and pubertal status, and shared decisions must take place at the time of diagnosis. This study aims to provide a critical review of current and emerging strategies for preserving and restoring fertility in prepubertal females, ranging from established methods to experimental approaches that can be offered before, during, and after anticancer therapies. Additionally, the author aims to review how clinicians' awareness of oncofertility options and the latest advancements in this field, timely referral, and proper consultations with patients and their families are vital in addressing their concerns, providing emotional support, and guiding them through the decision-making process, as well as potential barriers that may hinder the fertility preservation process., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest No competing interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: As advances in oncology have led to remarkable and steady improvements in the survival rates of patients with cancer and anticancer treatment can cause premature ovarian failure in women, fertility preservation (FP) has become a global public health concern and an integral part of the care for women diagnosed with cancer during reproductive age. However, for various reasons, FP remains underutilized for patients with cancer. There are substantial gaps in our knowledge about women's experiences and perceptions of the issue. This study aims to contribute to bridging that gap., Methods: This prospective qualitative study was conducted from March 2018 to February 2023. A combination of purposive and snowball sampling was used. Data were collected by semistructured interviews with nineteen reproductive-age women who had been recently diagnosed with cancer. Data were classified and analysed with a thematic analysis approach., Results: A variety of distinct themes and subthemes emerged from the analysis of the interview data. The cancer diagnosis emerged as a factor that considerably affects the women's attitudes towards biological parenthood: It can further increase their (strong) previous desire or decrease their previous (weak) desire. Women with a recent cancer diagnosis had not received adequate and multidisciplinary counselling, including clear and sufficient information. However, participants felt satisfied with the information they received because they either received the information they requested or remained in denial about the need to be informed (i.e., because they felt overwhelmed after the cancer diagnosis). Embryo cryopreservation emerged as a less desirable FP option for women with cancer. Participants showed respect for human embryos, not always for religious reasons. Surrogacy emerged as the last resort for most participants. Religious, social or financial factors did play a secondary (if any) role in women's decision-making about FP. Finally, male partners' opinions played a secondary role in most participants' decision-making about FP. If embryo cryopreservation was the selected option, partners would have a say because they were contributing their genetic material., Conclusions: The findings that emerged from the data analysis were partly consistent with prior studies. However, we identified some interesting nuances that are of clinical importance. The results of this study may serve as a starting point for future research., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objective: To conduct a systematic review of interventions that improve knowledge, health and decision-related outcomes in cancer, fertility or the intersection of both among low health literacy (LHL) patients., Methods: Articles published from 2000 to March 2022 in English were identified through searching MEDLINE, PsycInfo, and Embase databases on 29/03/2022. Studies were independently screened against eligibility criteria and appraised for quality. A narrative synthesis of data was presented., Results: Of 235 citations, 11 studies (2585 participants) investigating three categories were included: decision-support tools (n = 8), mobile health applications (n = 2) and communication tools (n = 1). No eligible study was identified for fertility or oncofertility. All interventions integrated multimedia or interactivity to supplement plain-language text. Decision aids and mobile health applications improved knowledge, reduced decisional conflict and increased clarity around cancer-related choices. Overall, findings favoured the use of online interventions tailored for LHL patients., Conclusion: There is a lack of data on LHL interventions in fertility and oncofertility. In cancer, LHL interventions improved knowledge and decision-making outcomes. The ideal intervention remains inconclusive., Practice Implications: Lack of engagement with LHL needs in oncofertility and fertility settings have implications for informed treatment decision-making. In cancer, further research is required to ascertain most effective intervention format., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To examine the factors associated with females attending a fertility consultation within 30 days of cancer diagnosis. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study, including females, 15 to 39 years of age, diagnosed with cancer in Ontario, Canada. Administrative data were used from the Institute of Clinical and Evaluative Sciences for the period 2006 to 2019. A backward selection multivariate logistic regression was performed, with a primary outcome of fertility consultation within 30 days of diagnosis. Results: A total of 20,556 females were included in the study, with 7% having attended a fertility visit within 30 days of diagnosis. Factors associated with being more likely to attend included: not currently having children (odds ratio [OR] = 4.3; confidence interval [95% CI 3.6-5.1]), later years of diagnosis (OR = 3.2; 95% CI [2.8-3.8]), having undergone chemotherapy (OR = 3.6; 95% CI [3.0-4.3]) or radiation therapy (OR = 1.9; 95% CI [1.6-2.2]), and less marginalization within dependency quintiles (OR 1.4; 95% CI [1.1-1.7]). Having a cancer with lower risk to fertility (OR = 0.3; 95% CI [0.2-0.3]), death within a year of diagnosis (OR = 0.4; 95% CI [0.3-0.6]), and residing in a northern region of Ontario (OR = 0.3; 95% CI [0.2-0.4]) were associated with being less likely to attend. For sociodemographic factors, lower levels of income (OR = 0.5; 95% CI [0.4-0.6]) and marginalization with residential instability (OR = 0.6; 95% CI [0.5-0.8]) were associated with being less likely to attend a fertility consultation. Conclusions: Rates for attendance of female fertility consultations after a cancer diagnosis remain low, with disparities by both clinical and demographic factors.

Purpose: This study investigates the impact of gonadotoxic cancer treatment on treatment-related amenorrhea (TRA) and hormonal status in pediatric and adolescent females who underwent fertility preservation (FP) consultation. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on 143 females under 21 with cancer referred to the FP clinic at Seoul National University Hospital between 2011 and 2022. We analyzed variables, including age, menarche status, cancer type, and treatment. Subsequently, subjects were evaluated to identify clinical factors affecting TRA at 1-year intervals following the completion of treatment. Upon cancer diagnosis, all patients received FP counseling and underwent semiannual evaluations for menstrual resumption and hormonal status. Results: The median age at diagnosis was 15; menarche was reported in 76.9%. Bone sarcoma (16.1%) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (14.7%) were predominant. Most consultations (74.8%) occurred pretreatment. After FP consultations, 9.8% of patients underwent oocyte cryopreservation, and 99.3% used gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists during systemic chemotherapy. One year after treatment completion, TRA was shown in 29.4% of this cohort. Cyclophosphamide-equivalent dose >4000 mg/m 2 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.279; 95% confidence interval [CI]; 1.018-5.105, p  = 0.045) and pelvic irradiation (aOR, 16.271; 95% CI, 1.545-171.408; p  = 0.020) were independent clinical factors predicting TRA. Conclusion: The study delineates the clinical factors affecting TRA in pediatric and adolescent cancer survivors, revealing the significant impact of specific treatment. The data highlight the critical role of personalized oncofertility consultations in this demographic, offering valuable insights for designing targeted FP strategies at tertiary centers.

Purpose: To understand how adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer experience family and partner involvement in fertility preservation (FP) decision-making. Methods: As part of a nationally representative Australian cross-sectional study of 15-25-year olds with cancer, 196 participants (mean age 19.9 [standard deviation 3.2] years at diagnosis; 51% male) were surveyed regarding FP decision-making. Results: One hundred sixty-one (83%) participants reported discussion of potential effects of cancer and its treatment on fertility, of whom 57 (35%) did not undertake FP (51% of females; 19% of males). Parental involvement (mothers 62%, fathers 45%) in decision-making was considered helpful, including for 73% of 20-25-year olds with partners. Sisters and brothers were involved less often, yet rated helpful in 48% and 41% of cases, respectively. Older participants were more likely than younger ones to have involved partners (47% vs. 22%, p  = 0.001) and less likely to have involved mothers (56% vs. 71%, p  = 0.04) or fathers (39% vs. 55%, p  = 0.04). Conclusion: This is the first quantitative study to explore family and partner involvement in AYA FP decision-making in both females and males in a nationally representative sample. Parents are important resources who commonly assist AYAs with these complex decisions. Although many AYAs will be the main decision-makers when it comes to FP, particularly as AYAs mature, these data suggest that resources and support should be available for and inclusive of parents, partners, and siblings.

Purpose: To explore Allied Health Professionals' (AHPs) experiences with and perceptions of posthumous assisted reproduction (PAR) among adolescent and young adults (AYA, ages 15-39) with a poor cancer prognosis. Methods: We conducted a qualitative analysis of video-based 90-minute focus groups (FGs) of AHPs who participated in the Enriching Communication Skills for Health Professionals in Oncofertility (ECHO) training program from May to August 2021. Moderator-facilitated discussions were guided by topics related to experiences around discussions and utilization of PAR among AYA with a poor cancer prognosis. Thematic analysis was conducted using the constant comparison method. Results: Forty-three AHPs participated in one of seven FGs. Three themes emerged: (1) PAR as palliative care: preserving patient's legacy for their partner, siblings, and parents; (2) ethical and legal considerations for balancing patient's time-sensitive needs; and (3) barriers AHPs encounter navigating complex dynamics of care in this population. Subthemes included an emphasis on patient autonomy, a multidisciplinary approach to counseling, early initiation of fertility discussions continuing over time, documenting reproductive desires, and concerns for family and offspring after patient death. Conclusions: AHPs desired timely conversations on reproductive legacy and family planning. In the absence of institutional policies, training, and resources, AHPs emphasized feeling ill-equipped to navigate the complex dynamics between patients, families, and colleagues. The development of transparent institutional policies, implementation of multidisciplinary care teams, and oversight with ethics committees may improve the provision of reproductive health care and/or end-of-life care for AYA with a poor cancer prognosis and their families.

Introduction: Few studies have examined the distinct reproductive concerns (RC) of men and women in the adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer patient population. The purpose of this mixed-methods study was to explore and differentiate the RC of AYAs., Methods: Participants completed the Reproductive Concerns After Cancer (RCAC) scale and participated in a semistructured interview. Interviews were deductively coded based on an analytic schema derived from the RCAC., Results: After identifying participants through the electronic health record, 27 younger AYAs, ages 12-25, enrolled in the study. Four inductive themes emerged and differed by gender. These include differential temporality, acceptance, and openness to alternatives, partner influence, and parental/guardian influence. AYA men reported fewer RC ( M  = 49.4, SD  = 9.6) compared to AYA women ( M  = 56.8, SD  = 8.4)., Conclusions: Oncofertility care providers are advised to account for short- and long-ranging concerns based on AYAs' gender. Future evaluations of patient-reported outcome measures specific to AYA RC are recommended.

Purpose: Body image is a major psychosocial concern for all cancer patients but can affect the adolescent and young adult (AYA) population in distinct ways. Similarly, the prospect of infertility and the fertility preservation process can create additional stress during cancer treatment. Discussions regarding infertility inherently implicate the body and its reproductive function, but downstream effects on self-perception have not been previously described. The aim of this study was to explore the experiences of AYAs as they considered their risk of infertility and options for fertility preservation (FP), specifically the ways in which this impacted body image and FP decision-making., Methods: AYA cancer patients ( n  = 27) aged 12-25 years whose cancer and treatment conferred risk of infertility were recruited through electronic health record query at an NCI-Designated Comprehensive Cancer Center. Participants completed semi-structured interviews, which were recorded, transcribed, and deductively coded for themes related to information needs, knowledge of treatment effects on fertility, and reproductive concerns after cancer. Emergent, inductive themes related to body image were identified., Results: Body image concerns, related to both physical appearance and body functioning emerged. Common concerns included anticipating change as it pertains to the body and its functions, physical discomfort, fear of judgment, and meeting expectations of the body. While these themes are broad in nature, they have been previously explored in relation to body image in general and their emergence in the oncofertility space provides guidance for further optimization of infertility and fertility preservation discussions., Conclusions: AYA cancer patients experience a multitude of body image related disturbances when faced with the possibility of infertility and fertility preservation. In identifying and exploring these themes, future opportunities for improving oncofertility practice and discussions among AYAs with a focus on body image positivity are called upon.

Purpose: To examine processes, barriers, and facilitators to sperm banking counseling and decision-making for adolescent males newly diagnosed with cancer from the perspective of clinicians who completed Oncofertility communication training. We also identify opportunities for improvement to inform future interventions and implementation., Methods: A survey (N=104) and subsequent focus groups (N=15) were conducted with non-physician clinicians practicing in pediatric oncology who completed Oncofertility communication training., Results: Most survey participants were confident in communicating about the impact of cancer on fertility (n=87, 83.7%) and fertility preservation options (n=80, 76.9%). Most participants reported never/rarely using a sperm banking decision tool (n=70, 67.3%), although 98.1% (n=102) said a decision tool with a family-centered approach would be beneficial. Primary themes in the subsequent focus groups included variable processes/workflows (inconsistent approaches to consult initiation; involvement of adolescents, caregivers, and various clinician types; assessment of puberty/sexual experience), structural and psychosocial barriers (cost and logistics, developmental, cultural, clinical acuity/prognosis), and facilitators (educational materials, alternative options for banking). Opportunities and strategies for improvement (including fertility preservation in existing research protocols; additional staffing/resources; oncologist education and buy-in; and development of decision tools) were informed by challenges identified in the other themes., Conclusion: Barriers to adolescent sperm banking remain, even among clinicians who have completed Oncofertility training. Although training is one factor necessary to facilitate banking, structural and psychosocial barriers persist. Given the complexities of offering sperm banking to pediatric populations, continued efforts are needed to mitigate structural barriers and develop strategies to facilitate decision-making before childhood cancer treatment., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Purpose: Oncofertility counseling of female cancer patients lacks efficient access to tailored and valid infertility risk estimates to support shared decision-making on fertility preservation treatments. The objective was to develop, conduct user-centered design, and plan clinic-based implementation of the Cancer Related Infertility Score Predictor (CRISP), a web-based tool to support infertility risk counseling. Methods: Using a mixed methods design, literature review was undertaken to abstract data on infertility, primary ovarian insufficiency, and amenorrhea risks of common cancer treatments. The CRISP website was programmed to take user input about patient ages and cancer treatments and generate a risk summary. Using user experience methodology and semistructured interviews, usability testing and implementation assessment were conducted with 12 providers recruited from 5 medical centers in Southern California. Results: The web-based CRISP tool encompasses infertility risk data for 60 treatment regimens among 10 cancer types. Usability testing demonstrated that the tool is intuitive and informed minor modifications, including adding crowd-sourced submission of additional cancer treatments. Participants rated the tool as credible, advantageous over current provider methods to ascertain infertility risks, and useful for tailoring treatment planning and counseling patients. A key barrier was lack of information on some cancer treatments. Fit within clinical workflow was feasible, particularly with electronic health record integration. Conclusions: The novel, web-based CRISP tool is a feasible, acceptable, and appropriate tool to address provider knowledge gap about cancer related infertility risks and use for patient counseling. CRISP has significant potential to support tailored oncofertility counseling in the heterogeneous young cancer patient population.

Fertility preservation in pregnant women recently diagnosed with cancer can be a challenge. Raised levels of human chorionic gonadotropin (Beta-hCG) and progesterone in this population of patients may pose a problem for the prompt initiation of controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) due to a potential negative feedback of these hormones on folliculogenesis; however, it is not feasible to wait for negativization of serum beta-hCG levels before starting controlled ovarian stimulation. In literature, very few cases have been reported regarding the preservation of fertility in pregnant women recently diagnosed with cancer. We performed an extended revision of the literature to evaluate the current knowledge of the management of fertility preservation in women with cancer and we examined two cases closely. The first case study involved a cancer patient who underwent surgical abortion at 6.5 weeks of gestation followed by administration of mifepristone to detach any minimal residual trophoblast and consequently to decrease serum beta-hCG and progesterone levels before starting COS. In the second case study, the cancer patient underwent surgical abortion at 7.1 weeks of gestation and simultaneous unilateral oophorectomy for ovarian tissue cryopreservation due to a limited time for COS. By analyzing the results of these studies, it could be hypothesized that mifepristone administration may favor the decrease of serum beta-hCG and progesterone levels in order to permit rapid initiation of COS. In cases where COS is not feasible, ovarian tissue cryopreservation should be considered as an alternative fertility preservation technique., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Purpose: Recently, direct communication with children about cancer seems to have shifted, but little is known about communication regarding discussions of future infertility risk due to cancer therapy. This study conducted cross-cultural comparisons between Japan and the United States to clarify communication patterns about cancer notification and develop appropriate information about fertility issues. Methods: An online survey was distributed to members of the Japanese Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology in July 2019 and the American Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology in July 2020. Based on the results from the survey, we developed three types of educational videos: a prepubertal version A, B, and a pubertal version. Next, we conducted a survey to assess whether these were appropriate for clinical practice. Results: We analyzed 325 physicians in Japan and 46 in the United States. In Japan, 80.5%, 91.7%, and 92.1% of the physicians notified patients aged 7-9, 10-14, and 15-17 years of their cancer diagnosis directly, respectively, compared within the United States, where the rate was 100%, regardless of age. Further, 9% and 45% of physicians in Japan and the United States, respectively, discuss fertility issues directly with patients aged 7-9 years. In the survey to assess the educational videos, 85% of the physicians preferred to use the educational videos in clinical practice. Conclusion: This is the first step in bringing concordance to communication patters for emerging cancer care around the globe and that this study and its intervention arm provide guidance in ways that ensure global equity in care.

Introduction: There is a lack of metrics to monitor and evaluate fertility care in adolescents and young adults with cancer. This study evaluated the indicator "proportion of cases attending a fertility consult visit ≤30 days from diagnosis of cancer" using the National Quality Forum (NQF) criteria. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study using administrative data available through the Institute of Clinical Evaluative Sciences in Ontario, Canada. Cases were included if they were diagnosed with a cancer between January 2005 and December 2019, and aged 15-39 years. Fertility consultations were identified by Ontario Health Insurance Plan Claims Database (OHIP) diagnostic codes 628 and 606.Validity was assessed by examining expected differences in the proportion of fertility consults within clinical and demographic factors using chi-square tests. Reliability was assessed by comparing fertility consult visits identified using OHIP diagnostic codes with consults identified using visits to physicians in a registered specialty, using Pearson's correlation coefficient. Results: The population was composed of 39,977 cases, with 6524 (16.3%) having attended a fertility consult. For diagnostic years 2016-2019, differences in the proportion of cases receiving their first fertility consult within 30 days of diagnosis were observed for sex, age, cancer type, hospital type, Local Health Integration Unit, and region ( p  < 0.001). There was no correlation between the time from diagnosis to fertility consult and time from diagnosis to the first visit to a fertility-related specialty ( r  = 0.11; p  = 0.002). Conclusion: The indicator examined in this article adhered to the criteria described by the NQF, providing a possible metric for reporting on oncofertility care.

Purpose: While cancer treatment advancements have increased the number of reproductive-aged women survivors, they can harm reproductive function. Despite national guidelines, oncofertility service uptake remains low. This review explores interventions for fertility preservation alignment with American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) guidelines and consideration of a multilevel framework., Methods: We systematically reviewed literature from 2006 to 2022 across four databases. Identified interventions were assessed and scored for quality based on CONSORT and TREND statement checklists. Results were synthesized to assess for intervention alignment with ASCO guidelines and four multilevel intervention framework characteristics: targeted levels of influence, conceptual clarity, methodologic pragmatism, and sustainability., Results: Of 407 articles identified, this review includes nine unique interventions. The average quality score was 7.7 out of 11. No intervention was guided by theory. Per ASCO guidelines, most (n=8) interventions included provider-led discussions of treatment-impaired fertility. Fewer noted discussions on fertility preservation approaches (n=5) and specified discussion timing (n=4). Most (n=8) referred patients to reproductive specialists, and few (n=2) included psychosocial service referrals. Most (n=8) were multilevel, with five targeting three levels of influence. Despite targeting multiple levels, all analyses were conducted at the individual level. Intervention strategies included: educational components (n=5), decision aids (n=2), and nurse navigators (n=2). Five interventions considered stakeholders' views. All interventions were implemented in real-world contexts, and only three discussed sustainability., Conclusions: This review identifies key gaps in ASCO guideline-concordant fertility preservation that could be filled by updating and adhering to standardized clinical practice guidelines and considering multilevel implementation frameworks elements., (© 2023. This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply.)

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence in adults younger than 50 years is steadily increasing in the USA, and treatment for CRC can impact future fertility. However, fertility decision-making in female patients with CRC can be complex, with fertility preservation (FP) counseling occurring inconsistently., Purpose: The goal of this scoping review was to assess the literature regarding the frequency and quality of fertility preservation (FP) discussions taking place among oncology clinicians and their reproductive-age female patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) in order to identify existing gaps in care and inform future research, interventions, or potential changes in practice., Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using the Ovid Medline, PsycInfo, and Scopus databases in order to identify studies pertaining to FP counseling in reproductive-age female patients with CRC. We used Covidence to screen studies for relevance and to extract data. Findings of interest included rate of fertility and/or FP discussions, patient characteristics associated with fertility discussions, initiators of discussions, rate of referrals to fertility specialists, patient utilization of FP services, and unmet fertility needs. We performed both quantitative and qualitative data synthesis., Results: We identified five studies that met our inclusion criteria, all published between 2007 and 2022. Frequency of fertility counseling discussions was low across studies, with a range of 15 to 52.5% of female patients with CRC receiving counseling. Patient characteristics which may be associated with likelihood of fertility discussion included age, parity, number of children, cancer location and stage, treatment type, and quality of life. The literature suggested that fertility discussions were initiated by clinicians about two-thirds of the time, and medical oncologists were the clinicians most likely to initiate. Studies did capture unmet fertility-related patient needs; participants who did not receive counseling often expressed desire for these discussions and regret that they did not occur., Conclusion: Despite increasing incidence of CRC in patients at younger ages, this scoping review found a dearth of research conducted on young female CRC patients' experiences with fertility counseling and referrals. Notably, the existing research reveals that relatively few of these patients are receiving appropriate counseling. Additional research is needed to clarify current FP counseling practices, patient and clinician perceptions about FP, and ways to improve the quantity and quality of FP counseling in this patient population., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Purpose: Reproductive health is important, but often neglected in cancer survivorship care. This study explored contraceptive use and factors associated with fertility testing among young adult survivors of childhood cancer in Germany., Methods: Young adult survivors of childhood cancer were identified through the German Childhood Cancer Registry and completed a mailed survey. Survivors were queried regarding contraceptive use, reproductive goals, uncertainty about fertility, and completion or interest in fertility testing. Multivariable stepwise logistic regression models were used to calculate Odds Ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) as a means of identifying factors associated with completion of and interest in fertility testing., Results: Survivors (N = 472; 57.8% female; aged 23.3 ± 1.5 years, and 14.9 ± 5.0 years from diagnosis), reported high rates of contraceptive use, including 61.2% using a single method, 30.6% dual methods, and 8.1% no/less effective methods. Few survivors had completed fertility testing (13.0%), although 58.8% were interested. Having been diagnosed during adolescence (OR = 2.66, 95%CI: 1.39-5.09), greater uncertainty about fertility (OR = 1.16, 95%CI: 1.03-1.31), and use of dual contraceptive methods (OR = 1.94, 95%CI: 1.02-3.69) were associated with having completed fertility testing. Factors associated with interest in fertility testing included goals of wanting to have children (OR = 7.76, 95%CI: 3.01-20.04) and greater uncertainty about fertility (OR = 1.19 95%CI: 1.06-1.33)., Conclusion: In this sample of young adults who survived childhood cancer, most reported contraceptive use. Few survivors had completed fertility testing, although more than half were interested. Interventions are needed to address potential barriers to fertility testing and help survivors manage fertility-related uncertainty., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Despite a plethora of literature on barriers to addressing future fertility in childhood cancer survivors, the data are not representative of limited middle-income settings. Unique and context-specific factors may influence addressing future fertility care among childhood cancer survivors in Uganda. This study aimed to explore the experiences, attitudes, and perceptions of parents on their interactions with health providers about future fertility, as part of their child's cancer survivorship. Methods: Using grounded theory, semistructured interviews were conducted with parents of children diagnosed with cancer, <18 years of age, and not in the induction or consolidation phases of treatment. Transcripts were thematically analyzed. Results: A total of 20 participants were interviewed, with the majority identifying as female ( n  = 18). The global theme that arose was the importance of shared decision-making, and the key themes encompassing this were as follows: (1) importance of accurate information, (2) respect of autonomy, and (3) engagement and psychosocial support. Conclusion: In Uganda, parents of children with cancer value a multifaceted approach to satisfactory decision-making within the context of oncofertility.

Purpose: Financial concern is a major issue for adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer patients. Furthermore, unaddressed oncofertility challenges (e.g., infertility) are linked to psychological distress and decreased overall quality of life. Little is known about how financial concern in terms of oncofertility (i.e., concern regarding affording fertility preservation [FP] services) impacts AYAs' decision making and experiences. Methods: AYA cancer patients ( n  = 27) aged 12-25 years whose cancer treatment conferred risk of infertility were recruited through electronic health record query. Participants completed semi-structured interviews, which were recorded, transcribed, and deductively coded for themes related to information needs, knowledge of treatment effects on fertility, and reproductive concerns after cancer. Emergent, inductive themes related to financial concern were identified. The Institutional Review Board at the University of Michigan approved this study (HUM#00157267). Results: Financial concern was a dominant theme across the qualitative data. Emergent themes included (1) varied access to health insurance, (2) presence of parental/guardian support, (3) reliance upon financial aid, (4) negotiating infertility risk, and (5) lack of preparation for long-term costs. AYAs relied heavily upon parents for out-of-pocket and insurance coverage support. Some participants sought financial aid when guided by providers. Several participants indicated that no financial support existed for their circumstance. Conclusions: Financial consequences in terms of oncofertility are a major issue affecting AYA cancer patients. The incidence and gravity of financial concern surrounding affording oncofertility services merits attention in future research (measuring financial resources of AYAs' parental/support networks), clinical practice (strategically addressing short- and long-term costs; tailored psychosocial support), and health care policy (promoting legislation to mandate pre- and post-treatment FP coverage).

Background: Many adolescent and young adult female (AYA-F) cancer survivors face decisions about family building using reproductive medicine or adoption to achieve parenthood. This study evaluated associations among reproductive distress, avoidance, and family-building decision making and identified sociodemographic and clinical characteristics related to high distress and avoidance., Methods: A cross-sectional survey assessed AYA-F survivors' oncofertility experiences. Measures included an investigator-designed Unmet Information Needs scale, Reproductive Concerns After Cancer Scale, Impact of Events Scale-Avoidance subscale, Decision Self-Efficacy scale, and Decision Conflict Scale. Two linear regression models evaluated correlates of decision self-efficacy and decisional conflict about family building after cancer. Bivariate analyses evaluated correlates of avoidance using Pearson's correlation, t-test, and ANOVA., Results: AYA-Fs (N = 111) averaged 31-years-old (SD = 5.49) and 3 years post-treatment (range: 1-23 years); 90% were nulliparous. Most common diagnoses were leukemia (24%) and breast cancer (22%). Average decisional conflict was 52.12 (SD = 23.87, range: 0-100); 74% of the sample reported DCS scores within the clinically significant range. Higher levels of reproductive distress (B = -0.23, p = 0.04) and avoidance (B = -0.24, p = 0.02) related to lower decision self-efficacy. Younger age (B = -0.18, p = 0.03), greater unmet information needs (B = 0.33, p < 0.001), and higher levels of reproductive distress (B = 0.34, p = 0.001) related to worse decisional conflict. Predictors of distress and avoidance were identified., Conclusions: After cancer treatment, high fertility distress and avoidant coping were associated with poorer quality decision making about family building after cancer. Fertility counseling post-treatment should support self-efficacy and constructive coping skills to counteract high distress, maladaptive coping, and facilitate values-based decision making., (© 2023 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Primary care physicians not only coordinate referrals to oncology services but can play a crucial role in successful fertility preservation referrals in cancer-diagnosed patients. Hence, it is important to assess their knowledge and attitudes towards fertility preservation., Methods: An eighteen-item oncofertility survey was administered to primary care physicians between May 2019 to September 2020.  Results: A total of forty-six responses were received and analysed. About 60% of primary care physicians did not have adequate knowledge about available fertility preservation options and only 26-32% were aware of international guidelines recommending fertility preservation in cancer patients.  Conclusions: Imparting awareness and knowledge of fertility preservation and its options to primary care physicians could enable an integrated cancer care model while also facilitating successful oncofertility referrals in countries like India., Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed., (Copyright: © 2023 Tholeti P et al.)

Oncofertility is an emerging field that incorporates diverse disciplines working together to care for oncology patients from birth to adulthood who are facing surgery, radiation therapy, or chemotherapy that may impact their fertility potential and reproductive function. Providing this care to newly diagnosed oncology patients in an expedited manner can be challenging. There is currently a paucity of published data about how this care is provided, training and education of individuals providing this care, and patient-reported outcomes related specifically to oncofertility care. The role of the oncofertility patient navigator is to bridge the institutional and disciplinary boundaries so oncology patients of all ages can receive timely information regarding fertility risk and preservation options at diagnosis and throughout survivorship care. The purpose of this paper is to define the role of the oncofertility patient navigator within diverse models of care and health care systems, and provide a framework for ongoing efforts to improve reproductive care for those affected by cancer in their years of child-bearing potential., (© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Purpose: To establish the extent of self-reported reproductive failure associated with cancer treatment, and attitudes toward fertility among adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors in Uganda. Methods: A registry-based computer-assisted telephone interview survey was conducted in Uganda. The survey population were survivors of childhood, adolescent and early adulthood cancers diagnosed between 2007 and 2018. The survey explored fertility outcomes, experiences of oncofertility and fertility attitudes of AYA cancer survivors. Results: Thirty-four (female = 14 and male = 20) interviews were completed. Survivors were 18-35 years of age. The median age at cancer diagnosis was 23.5 for females and 17.5 for males. Kaposi's sarcoma contributed to 44% of primary cancer diagnoses. All the survivors had received chemotherapy alone or in combination with other modalities and 79% of survivors had not received satisfactory information about future fertility before cancer treatment. Twenty one percent of males and 46% females met the criteria for infertility and 60% of these had met this criterion after their cancer diagnosis. Eighty two percent wanted to raise a biologically related child. Forty seven percent would be dissatisfied with their lives if they were unable to have a child or additional children. Conclusion: AYA cancer survivors in this low-resource setting reported reproductive failure, despite a strong fertility desire. Information and counseling provided on therapy-related problems before cancer treatment was insufficient and reinforces the need to build capacity for oncofertility resources within the region.

Purpose: To report our experience of fertility preservation (FP) in female cancer patients., Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of female who underwent elective oocyte or embryo cryopreservation before cancer treatment between January 2015 and December 2020 at Asan Medical Center. We analyzed the type of cancer, the rate of reuse of cryopreserved oocytes or embryos, and fertility outcomes such as the resumption of menstruation or pregnancy., Results: A total of 174 patients underwent 182 oocyte retrieval cycles after controlled ovarian stimulation for oocyte or embryo cryopreservation. The median age of patients was 33.0 (range 19-46) years, and the patients were most unmarried female (65.52%). The majority of patients were diagnosed with breast cancer (78.16%), and the remaining were diagnosed with gastrointestinal (6.33%) and hematologic malignancies (5.75%). The maturation rate of oocyte cryopreservation was 83.33%, and the fertilization rate of embryo cryopreservation was 72.07%. Of the 57 patients currently not undergoing cancer treatment, 34 resumed menstruating and 19 (33.33%, 19/57) returned to attempt a pregnancy. Among them, five patients succeeded in natural pregnancy. Eleven patients received frozen-thawed embryo transfer, and four patients succeeded in becoming pregnant (36.36%, 4/11). Only 6.3% of patients returned to use their gametes, and 93.7% of gametes are still in storage., Conclusion: FP in cancer patients should be considered before cancer treatment. Through continuous research on oncofertility, it is necessary to consider how to increase the return rate and provide appropriate information to cancer patients of reproductive age., Competing Interests: The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose., (© Copyright: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2023.)

Purpose: To identify the proportion of reproductive age women with breast cancer that engaged in a fertility preservation discussion and reproductive endocrinology and infertility (REI) consultation., Methods: This cross-sectional survey recruited women 18-42 years who were diagnosed with breast cancer from 2006 to 2016 by phone or email and asked them to complete an online survey. Demographic characteristics, barriers to FP, utilization of FP consultation, and FP procedures (oocyte and embryo cryopreservation) were analyzed., Results: A majority of women (64%) did not have FP discussed by any provider. Older women and those who were parents at the time of diagnosis were less likely to engage in a FP discussion. However, there were no significant differences in partner status or cancer stage between women with or without FP discussions. Of the women who desired future children prior to the cancer diagnosis, 93% received chemotherapy; however, only 34% of these women had a consultation with an REI. The most common reasons for declining FP consultation were already having their desired number of children (41%), financial barriers (14%), and concern about delaying cancer treatment and cancer recurrence (12%). Forty percent of women who desired future children and met with an REI pursued FP procedures., Conclusion: Younger women were more likely to receive FP counseling. FP consultations and procedures were low even in women who desired future fertility, with the predominant barriers being cost, fears concerning a delay in cancer treatment, and future cancer recurrence., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Purpose: The lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) Oncofertility Education (LOvE) module aims to improve knowledge on providing inclusive and affirming care for LGBTQ adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer. The objective of this study is to evaluate the role of the module in improving reproductive health communication for the care of LGBTQ AYAs with cancer. Methods: A 10-item multiple-choice pre-test and post-test assessed learner knowledge, with total knowledge scores ranging from 0 (no correct responses) to 10 (all correct responses). A post-module survey and open-ended questions assessed relevance of the module, quality, and appropriateness to professional practice. Paired t -tests analyzed changes in knowledge before and after the module. Content analysis was applied to qualitative responses. Results: Thirty-seven learners completed both the pre-test and post-test. Around 8.1% correctly answered all pre-test questions; 59.5% correctly answered all posttest questions. The average pre-test score was 8.3, versus posttest score of 9.5 ( p  < 0.0001). Eighty-nine percent of learners strongly agreed that LOvE Enriching Communication Skills for Health Professionals in Oncofertility was relevant to their work; 95% strongly agreed that it was easy to understand and navigate. Open-ended responses highlighted how the module helped learners strengthen the provider-patient relationship in the context of oncofertility, create a safe space for patients, and understand the relevance of educational materials about fertility to LGBTQ patients. Conclusions: We found significant improvement in knowledge of reproductive health care for LGBTQ AYAs with cancer after completing the module. Improving provider knowledge may improve confidence in providing inclusive and affirming care for LGBTQ AYAs with cancer, resulting in improved whole-person care.

Certain chemotherapy agents, radiation, and surgery can all negatively impact future fertility. Consults regarding treatment-related risk for infertility and gonadal late effects of these agents should occur at the time of diagnosis as well as during survivorship. Counseling on fertility risk has traditionally varied significantly across providers and institutions. We aim to provide a guide to standardize the assignment of gonadotoxic risk, which can be used in counseling patients both at the time of diagnosis and in survivorship. Gonadotoxic therapies were abstracted from 26 frontline Children's Oncology Group (COG) phase III protocols for leukemia/lymphoma, in use from 2000-2022. A stratification system based on gonadotoxic therapies, sex, and pubertal status was used to assign treatments into minimal, significant, and high level of increased risk for gonadal dysfunction/infertility. Risk levels were assigned to protocols and different treatment arms to aid oncologists and survivor care providers in counseling patients regarding treatment-related gonadotoxicity. Males were most commonly at high risk, with at least one high-risk arm in 14/26 protocols (54%), followed by pubertal females (23% of protocols) and prepubertal females (15% of protocols). All patients who received direct gonadal radiation or hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) were considered at high risk. Partnering with patients and their oncology/survivorship team is imperative for effective fertility counseling both prior to and post treatment, and this comprehensive guide can be used as a tool to standardize and improve reproductive health counseling in patients undergoing COG-based leukemia/lymphoma care., (© 2023 The Authors. Pediatric Blood & Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Fertility preservation in cancer patients is currently based on either assisted reproductive technology or fertility-sparing surgery. Loss of fertility may be caused by excisional surgery associated with an adnexal or uterine pathology or secondary to gonadal insufficiency caused by chemotherapy or radiation. The counseling of these patients is very important, being carried out jointly by the oncologist, gynecologist, and reproductive medicine specialist. Reproductive surgery usually requires avoiding laparotomy to significantly reduce the formation of adhesions and trauma or tissue damage. This is done using standard laparoscopic surgery or robotic surgery (computer-assisted laparoscopy), a method increasingly used and accessible to all specialists who want to maintain the fertility of their patients with various oncological diseases., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (©2023 JOURNAL of MEDICINE and LIFE.)

Purpose: Adolescent and young adult (AYA) survivors are at-risk for cancer-related financial difficulties (i.e., financial toxicity [FT]). Family building after cancer often requires reproductive medicine or adoption with high costs; AYAs experience financial barriers to family building. This study evaluated the relationships among cancer FT, reproductive concerns, and decision-making processes about family building after cancer. Methods: AYA female (AYA-F) cancer survivors completed a cross-sectional survey including measures of FT, reproductive concerns, decisional conflict about family building, and decision-making self-efficacy. Differences across FT subgroups (i.e., no/mild, moderate, and severe FT) were tested. Linear regression evaluated the relationships between FT and reproductive concerns and decision-making processes. Results: Participants ( N  = 111) averaged 31.0 years (standard deviation [SD] = 5.49), 90% were nulliparous, and 84% were employed full/part-time. The overall FT levels were in the "moderate" range ( M  = 20.44, SD = 9.83); 48% worried quite a bit or very much about financial problems because of cancer. AYA-Fs reporting severe FT (24% of sample) experienced higher levels of reproductive concerns compared with those reporting no/mild and moderate FT. Those reporting moderate FT (46% of sample) reported greater decisional conflict about family-building options, compared with the no/mild FT subgroup. Both moderate and severe FT subgroups reported lower decision-making self-efficacy compared with the no/mild FT subgroup. In separate models controlling for covariates, greater FT related to higher levels of reproductive concerns ( B  = -0.39, p  < 0.001), greater decisional conflict about family building ( B  = -0.56, p  = 0.02), and lower decision-making self-efficacy ( B  = 0.60, p  = 0.01). Conclusions: Given the high costs of reproductive medicine and adoption, fertility counseling pre- and post-treatment must address survivors' financial concerns and barriers.

Purpose: Fertility preservation (FP) and family building are important considerations for quality survivorship for young cancer patients. Resident physicians across all specialties encounter reproductive-aged cancer patients. The purpose of this study was to assess resident physicians' attitudes and awareness about FP with the goal to identify specific educational gaps to direct future training. Methods: The Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved anonymous online survey was sent to resident physicians across specialties at three separate academic-affiliated campuses in one state. The survey consisted of three sections: awareness about FP options and knowledge about referral placement, attitudes and comfort levels discussing FP, and practices regarding FP. Data were collected in Qualtrics and analyzed by resident specialty, age, level of training, and gender. Statistical analyses were conducted with Prism. Results: Obstetrics and gynecology residents and fellows were significantly more aware of FP options in cancer patients than their counterparts in other specialties. Postgraduate year (PGY 3) residents and beyond were more aware of at least one male and one female FP option compared with PGY 1 and 2 residents. Of importance, we found that the majority of resident physicians are aware of FP options and the referral process, but they are uncomfortable discussing these techniques with their patients. Conclusion: To provide better education for patients, focus should be on outpatient educational activities for both the health care provider and the patient to facilitate conversation about FP.

Purpose: Cancer and its treatment can impair fertility in men. It is recommended that they be referred for fertility consultation before the start of treatment. This study examined factors associated with men attending a fertility consultation within 30 days of diagnosis. Methods: Males 15 to 39 years of age, diagnosed with cancer in Ontario, Canada, between 2006 and 2019, were identified from the Ontario Cancer Registry. Linked administrative data were used to obtain other clinical and sociodemographic variables. The main outcome was a fertility consultation within 30 days of diagnosis, defined using Ontario Health Insurance Plan billing codes (606 or 628). A backward selection multivariate logistic regression was performed. Results: Of 13,720 cases identified, 8.5% attended a fertility consultation within 30 days of diagnosis. A more recent year of diagnosis (odds ratio [OR] = 5.5; 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.6-6.6), living in an urban area (OR = 1.3; 95% CI 1.0-1.8), receiving radiation therapy (OR = 1.4; 95% CI 1.2-1.6), chemotherapy (OR = 1.9; 95% CI 1.6-2.2), and reproductive organ-related cancer surgery (OR = 1.5; 95% CI 1.2-1.7) were associated with a greater likelihood of attending a consultation. Older age (OR = 0.2; 95% CI 0.1-0.2), living in a northern region (OR = 0.3; 95% CI 0.2-0.5), having a cancer with low (OR = 0.3; 95% CI 0.2-0.4) or moderate risk to fertility (OR = 0.6; 95% CI 0.5-0.7), and residing in a neighborhood with lower income (OR = 0.4; 95% CI 0.3-0.5) or residential instability quintile (OR = 0.8; 95% CI 0.6-1.0) were associated with being less likely to attend a consultation. Conclusion: Although rates of fertility consultation have increased over time, these remain low in various clinical and demographic groups. Funding for fertility preservation appears to have had an important impact on fertility consultation in young men with cancer.

Purpose: Oncofertility care for pediatric, adolescent, and young adult cancer patients remains under-implemented across adult and pediatric oncology settings. We pilot tested an electronic health record (EHR)-enabled multicomponent oncofertility intervention (including screening, referral, and fertility consult) in an adult academic oncology program and systematically assessed intervention fit to pediatric and community oncology programs. Methods: Using surveys ( n  = 33), audits ( n  = 143), and interviews ( n  = 21) guided by implementation science frameworks, we pilot tested the EHR-enabled intervention for oncofertility care in young cancer patients at an adult oncology program and evaluated implementation outcomes. We interviewed health care providers from seven regional oncology and fertility programs about intervention fit to their clinical contexts. Results: We recruited 33 health care providers from an adult oncology setting and 15 health care providers from seven additional oncology and fertility settings. At the adult oncology setting, the intervention was found to be appropriate, acceptable, and feasible and improved the screening of fertility needs (from 30% pre- to 51% post-intervention); yet, some patients did not receive appropriate referrals to fertility consults. Providers across all settings suggested content and context modifications, such as adding options to the intervention or allowing the screening component to pop up at a second visit, to improve and adapt the intervention to better fit their clinical care contexts. Conclusions: We found that the EHR-enabled intervention increased the rate of goal-concordant oncofertility care delivery at an adult oncology program. We also identified facilitators, barriers, and needed adaptations to the intervention required for implementation and scaling-up across diverse oncology settings.

Purpose: As a secondary report to elucidate the diverse spectrum of oncofertility practices for childhood cancer around the globe, we present and discuss the comparisons of oncofertility practices for childhood cancer in limited versus optimum resource settings based on data collected in the Repro-Can-OPEN Study Part I & II., Methods: We surveyed 39 oncofertility centers including 14 in limited resource settings from Africa, Asia, and Latin America (Repro-Can-OPEN Study Part I), and 25 in optimum resource settings from the USA, Europe, Australia, and Japan (Repro-Can-OPEN Study Part II). Survey questions covered the availability of fertility preservation and restoration options offered in case of childhood cancer as well as their degree of utilization., Results: In the Repro-Can-OPEN Study Part I & II, responses for childhood cancer and calculated oncofertility scores showed the following characteristics: (1) higher oncofertility scores in optimum resource settings than in limited resource settings for ovarian and testicular tissue cryopreservation; (2) frequent utilization of gonadal shielding, fractionation of anticancer therapy, oophoropexy, and GnRH analogs; (3) promising utilization of oocyte in vitro maturation (IVM); and (4) rare utilization of neoadjuvant cytoprotective pharmacotherapy, artificial ovary, in vitro spermatogenesis, and stem cells reproductive technology as they are still in preclinical or early clinical research settings., Conclusions: Based on Repro-Can-OPEN Study Part I & II, we presented a plausible oncofertility best practice model to help optimize care for children with cancer in various resource settings. Special ethical concerns should be considered when offering advanced and innovative oncofertility options to children., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: While all reproductive-aged individuals with cancer should be offered fertility preservation (FP) counseling, there is little guidance over offers to adolescent and young adults (AYA) with terminal diagnoses, especially when considering posthumous assisted reproduction (PAR). The Enriching Communication skills for Health professionals in Oncofertility (ECHO/ENRICH) trains Allied Health Professionals (AHPs) to improve communication with AYAs with cancer. Little is known about AHPs' role in assisting in FP and PAR decisions., Methods: This is a cross-sectional survey of ECHO/ENRICH trainees' attitudes and experience with FP and PAR in AYA with terminal cancer., Results: The response rate was 61% (365/601). While 69% felt comfortable discussing FP with terminal AYA after ECHO/ENRICH training, 85% desired further education. The majority (88%) agreed FP should be an option for AYA with cancer, though some agreed offering FP provided false hope (16%) or was a waste of resources (7%). Most shared that avoidance of FP discussions was common practice, especially in the medically fragile, late-stage disease, or among minors. Many attributed lack of conversations to oncology team goals. Only 9% had prior experience with PAR. Many were conflicted about how PAR reproductive material should be gifted and who should be permitted to use PAR. Several raised moral concerns for PAR, or discomfort advising family. Many voiced desire for additional PAR-specific education., Conclusion: ECHO/ENRICH trainees had varied levels of exposure to FP in terminal AYA and limited experiences with PAR. Many expressed uncertainties with PAR, which may be alleviated with further training and transparent institutional policies., (© 2022 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Purpose: Fertility is a major concern for adolescents and young adults (AYAs, 15-30 years) diagnosed with cancer, yet they often report a lack of information and understanding about fertility impacts and preservation options. This study aimed to evaluate the acceptability and preliminary efficacy of Maybe Later Baby (MLB), an oncofertility information resource for AYAs diagnosed with cancer. Methods: In a randomized controlled trial, 13 participants received MLB alone and 10 received an augmented intervention involving an additional consultation with a health care professional (HCP). Pre- and postintervention surveys and interviews explored participants' well-being, fertility knowledge, health literacy, and experiences using the resource. Results: Participants indicated that the resource was accessible and understandable and provided valuable information without increasing distress. When averaged across conditions, functional health literacy ( p  = 0.006) and oncofertility knowledge ( p  = 0.002) increased, although there were no significant changes in fertility-related emotions ( p  > 0.05), and quality of life decreased ( p  = 0.014). While qualitative accounts suggested that HCP consultations were useful and validated participants' experiences and concerns, participants receiving the augmented intervention became more nervous/fearful about fertility treatment ( p  = 0.005). There were no other differences in outcomes between conditions. Conclusions: Young people diagnosed with cancer want and value information about oncofertility and resources such as MLB are acceptable and useful means of providing this information. This could be supplemented by clinical discussion to ensure that tailored situation-specific information is provided and understood and patient distress is appropriately managed. Clinical Trial Registration number: 12615000624583.

Purpose: Often cited barriers to fertility preservation (FP) among female adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer patients include cost and time. We hypothesized that oncologists overestimate the time and costs required for female FP. Methods: We distributed an electronic survey to physicians in oncology-related departments. The survey assessed the knowledge and utilization of gonadotoxic therapies, FP options and requirements, and FP referral patterns. Student's t , Fisher's exact, ANOVA, and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used for continuous variables as appropriate; the chi-squared test was used for categorical variables. Results: Among respondents who reported prescribing gonadotoxic agents to AYAs ( n  = 38), 79% reported often / always discussing FP options, while only half referred to a reproductive specialist often / always . A smaller proportion of pediatric oncologists discussed FP often / always ( p  = 0.04) and most referred <25% of patients to a reproductive specialist; however, the majority of other specialists referred ≥75% of patients to a reproductive specialist ( p  = 0.001). While most respondents accurately estimated the time required to complete FP, the majority overestimated the cost of an FP procedure. Knowledge of FP options was inconsistent, with 63.2% reporting that suppression of the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian-axis is an option for FP, with 82.6% of these classifying it as standard of care. Conclusions: With variation across specialties, most oncology specialists prescribing gonadotoxic therapies for AYA females discuss FP, while a smaller proportion refer patients for FP. Despite relative accuracy in estimating the time required for FP, they overestimate costs of FP. Educational curricula related to FP are necessary across oncology specialties, especially pediatric oncology.

Background: Oncofertility is a developing field of increasing importance, particularly in pediatric oncology, where most patients are likely to survive long-term and have not yet had the opportunity to have children., Aims: We performed a quality improvement initiative to increase our rates of fertility preservation counseling and referral through the implementation of a pediatric oncofertility team, and we report outcomes 7 years following implementation of our initiative., Methods and Results: We compare our baseline oncofertility survey to 44 post-intervention survey respondents and electronic medical record documentation for 149 patients treated in 2019. Ninety-five percent of post-intervention survey respondents recalled fertility counseling (baseline 70%, p = .004) and 89.3% were appropriately referred for fertility preservation (baseline 50%, p = .017). Counseling was documented in 60.4% of charts; 81% of patients analyzed by chart review were appropriately referred for fertility preservation. Fertility preservation outcomes differed by sex assigned at birth., Conclusion: Creation of an oncofertility team produced improvements in fertility counseling and fertility preservation referral across an extended period of time., (© 2022 The Authors. Cancer Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

With the development of the paediatric oncohaematological care and improving healing results, the focus on survival with high quality of life increases. Some oncohaematological treatments have a high gonadotoxicity and can cause infertility, therefore the fertility preservation is gaining ground worldwide. Most of the fertility preservation procedures are not yet available in childhood in Hungary. One of the main fertility preservation methods is the ovarian cryopreservation followed by ovarian autotransplantation. The aim of this article is to introduce the first prepubertal ovarian cryopreservation procedure in Hungary. The procedure was a collaboration between the 2nd Department of Paediatrics and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of Semmelweis University. The patient treated with lymphoblastic granulomatosis was accepted for allogenic bone marrow transplantation, which conditional therapy has a very high gonadotoxic impact, with a consequential infertility. Also responding to the patient's family request, the oncoteam decided to carry out a fertility preservation procedure, an ovarian cryopreservation. With the necessary permits, we carried out the first laparoscopic ovarian removal for cryopreservation in a prepubertal girl at the 2nd Department of Paediatrics of Semmelweis University, resulting the tissue deep frozen at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of Semmelweis University. With the development of oncohaematological treatments, there is a growing need for fertility preservation methods. Most of these are already available for women, but not for the age group under eighteen. The presented ovarian cryopreservation method for the 13-year-old girl is the pioneer case in Hungary. In the future, the authors aim to create a national oncofertility network that can serve as a basis for the smoothest care of similar cases. Orv Hetil. 2023; 164(3): 104-109.

Objective: Female cancer survivors planning to become pregnant are concerned about the impact of cancer treatment on their ability to maintain normal pregnancy and the negative impact on their offspring. However, studies on the pregnancy outcomes of cancer survivors in Japan are limited. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the pregnancy outcomes of female cancer survivors by comparing them with women without a history of malignant tumors in Japan., Methods: This cross-sectional study included 3308 subjects, based on an internet-based questionnaire (self-reported) survey conducted in Japan. Differences in pregnancy outcomes, including multiple pregnancies, stillbirth, preterm birth (PTB), and infant birthweight, between cancer survivors and subjects without a history of malignant tumors, were evaluated using a generalized linear mixed-effects model with adjustment for possible confounding factors., Results: Of 3308 subjects included in this study, 629 (19.0%) were cancer survivors, among whom cervical (40.4%), breast (19.1%), and thyroid (7.0%) malignancies were most frequent. 71 (2.2%) and 53 (1.6%) participants had a history of multiple pregnancies and stillbirth, respectively; 385 (11.8%), 179 (5.5%), and 137 (4.2%) participants, respectively, had histories of PTB at less than 37, 34, and 32 weeks of gestation. Further, 302 (10.7%), 326 (11.6%), and 330 (11.7%) participants delivered to low birthweight (LBW), small-for-gestational-age (SGA), and large-for-gestational-age (LGA) infants, respectively. Subjects with a history of cervical or breast cancers had significantly higher odds of PTB at <37 weeks of gestation (adjusted odds ratios [ORs], 1.87 [95% CI: 1.25-2.81] and 2.61 [95% CI: 1.77-3.86], respectively), preterm LBW infants (adjusted ORs, 2.70 [95% CI: 1.39-5.24] and 2.76 [95% CI: 1.03-7.38], respectively), and LGA infants (1.98 [95% CI: 1.36-2.89] and 1.99 [95% CI: 1.14-3.49], respectively), compared to those without a history of a malignant tumor. Subjects with a history of thyroid cancer had significantly higher odds of stillbirth (adjusted OR, 5.11 [95% CI: 1.11-23.5])., Conclusion: Cancer survivors had a higher risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes than those without a history of malignant tumors in Japan. Healthcare providers should consider the high likelihood of adverse pregnancy outcomes during preconception counseling for cancer survivors.

Purpose: Although relatively new in Asian countries, fertility preservation (FP) discussions are crucial for adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer patients. This study highlights patients' and their caregivers' perceptions of communications quality during FP discussions in Korea., Methods: Participants were AYA patients and their caregivers (each: n = 34). The study examined the clinical pathways for FP and used surveys to collect details on discussion characteristics and satisfaction levels during FP discussions at the Yonsei Cancer Center, Seoul, Korea. Quality and degree of satisfaction with FP discussions were measured on a scale ranging from 1 to 7., Results: Two caregivers did not complete the survey. All respondents reported high overall satisfaction; however, several factors were related to low satisfaction with information quality. Caregivers who received both verbal communication and nonverbal communication tools (e.g., pamphlets, Internet resources) were more satisfied with the information quality than those who only received verbal communication. Regarding provider type, both respondent groups reported high overall satisfaction with physicians, rather than other types of care providers. Regarding the number of discussion sessions, respondents reported an improved understanding of FP and better communication and information quality if they participated in more than one discussion session., Conclusion: The FP process for AYA cancer patients can be improved by adjusting the type of provider, number of discussion sessions, and types of information. This will form the cornerstone of effective FP communication in Korea., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)