Search

Your search keyword '"Yang, LiMing"' showing total 34 results
Start Over Author "Yang, LiMing" Topic neoplasms
34 results on '"Yang, LiMing"'

1. Single-cell chromatin accessibility reveals malignant regulatory programs in primary human cancers.

Author

Sundaram L, Kumar A, Zatzman M, Salcedo A, Ravindra N, Shams S, Louie BH, Bagdatli ST, Myers MA, Sarmashghi S, Choi HY, Choi WY, Yost KE, Zhao Y, Granja JM, Hinoue T, Hayes DN, Cherniack A, Felau I, Choudhry H, Zenklusen JC, Farh KK, McPherson A, Curtis C, Laird PW, Demchok JA, Yang L, Tarnuzzer R, Caesar-Johnson SJ, Wang Z, Doane AS, Khurana E, Castro MAA, Lazar AJ, Broom BM, Weinstein JN, Akbani R, Kumar SV, Raphael BJ, Wong CK, Stuart JM, Safavi R, Benz CC, Johnson BK, Kyi C, Shen H, Corces MR, Chang HY, and Greenleaf WJ

Subjects
Humans, Neural Networks, Computer, Mutation, DNA Copy Number Variations, Breast Neoplasms genetics, Breast Neoplasms pathology, Chromatin metabolism, Chromatin genetics, Single-Cell Analysis, Neoplasms genetics, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic
Abstract

To identify cancer-associated gene regulatory changes, we generated single-cell chromatin accessibility landscapes across eight tumor types as part of The Cancer Genome Atlas. Tumor chromatin accessibility is strongly influenced by copy number alterations that can be used to identify subclones, yet underlying cis-regulatory landscapes retain cancer type-specific features. Using organ-matched healthy tissues, we identified the "nearest healthy" cell types in diverse cancers, demonstrating that the chromatin signature of basal-like-subtype breast cancer is most similar to secretory-type luminal epithelial cells. Neural network models trained to learn regulatory programs in cancer revealed enrichment of model-prioritized somatic noncoding mutations near cancer-associated genes, suggesting that dispersed, nonrecurrent, noncoding mutations in cancer are functional. Overall, these data and interpretable gene regulatory models for cancer and healthy tissue provide a framework for understanding cancer-specific gene regulation.

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

2. The NCI Genomic Data Commons.

Author

Heath AP, Ferretti V, Agrawal S, An M, Angelakos JC, Arya R, Bajari R, Baqar B, Barnowski JHB, Burt J, Catton A, Chan BF, Chu F, Cullion K, Davidsen T, Do PM, Dompierre C, Ferguson ML, Fitzsimons MS, Ford M, Fukuma M, Gaheen S, Ganji GL, Garcia TI, George SS, Gerhard DS, Gerthoffert F, Gomez F, Han K, Hernandez KM, Issac B, Jackson R, Jensen MA, Joshi S, Kadam A, Khurana A, Kim KMJ, Kraft VE, Li S, Lichtenberg TM, Lodato J, Lolla L, Martinov P, Mazzone JA, Miller DP, Miller I, Miller JS, Miyauchi K, Murphy MW, Nullet T, Ogwara RO, Ortuño FM, Pedrosa J, Pham PL, Popov MY, Porter JJ, Powell R, Rademacher K, Reid CP, Rich S, Rogel B, Sahni H, Savage JH, Schmitt KA, Simmons TJ, Sislow J, Spring J, Stein L, Sullivan S, Tang Y, Thiagarajan M, Troyer HD, Wang C, Wang Z, West BL, Wilmer A, Wilson S, Wu K, Wysocki WP, Xiang L, Yamada JT, Yang L, Yu C, Yung CK, Zenklusen JC, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Zhao Y, Zubair A, Staudt LM, and Grossman RL

Subjects
Genomics, Humans, Information Dissemination, National Cancer Institute (U.S.), United States, User-Computer Interface, Databases, Genetic, Neoplasms genetics
Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

3. Before and After: Comparison of Legacy and Harmonized TCGA Genomic Data Commons' Data.

Author

Gao GF, Parker JS, Reynolds SM, Silva TC, Wang LB, Zhou W, Akbani R, Bailey M, Balu S, Berman BP, Brooks D, Chen H, Cherniack AD, Demchok JA, Ding L, Felau I, Gaheen S, Gerhard DS, Heiman DI, Hernandez KM, Hoadley KA, Jayasinghe R, Kemal A, Knijnenburg TA, Laird PW, Mensah MKA, Mungall AJ, Robertson AG, Shen H, Tarnuzzer R, Wang Z, Wyczalkowski M, Yang L, Zenklusen JC, Zhang Z, Liang H, and Noble MS

Subjects
Controlled Before-After Studies, Datasets as Topic, Gene Expression Profiling, Genome, Human, Genomics, Health Information Exchange, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Humans, Molecular Sequence Annotation, Reproducibility of Results, Genome genetics, MicroRNAs genetics, Neoplasms genetics, Software
Abstract

We present a systematic analysis of the effects of synchronizing a large-scale, deeply characterized, multi-omic dataset to the current human reference genome, using updated software, pipelines, and annotations. For each of 5 molecular data platforms in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)-mRNA and miRNA expression, single nucleotide variants, DNA methylation and copy number alterations-comprehensive sample, gene, and probe-level studies were performed, towards quantifying the degree of similarity between the 'legacy' GRCh37 (hg19) TCGA data and its GRCh38 (hg38) version as 'harmonized' by the Genomic Data Commons. We offer gene lists to elucidate differences that remained after controlling for confounders, and strategies to mitigate their impact on biological interpretation. Our results demonstrate that the hg19 and hg38 TCGA datasets are very highly concordant, promote informed use of either legacy or harmonized omics data, and provide a rubric that encourages similar comparisons as new data emerge and reference data evolve., (Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Published
2019
Full Text
View/download PDF

4. Integrative genomic analyses on Ikaros and its expression related to solid cancer prognosis.

Author

Yang L, Luo Y, and Wei J

Subjects
Amino Acid Sequence, Amphibians genetics, Animals, Base Sequence, Birds genetics, Fishes genetics, Gene Expression Profiling, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Humans, Ikaros Transcription Factor metabolism, Mammals genetics, Molecular Sequence Data, Neoplasms genetics, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Phylogeny, Prognosis, Sequence Homology, Amino Acid, Systems Integration, Genomics methods, Ikaros Transcription Factor genetics, Neoplasms diagnosis
Abstract

Ikaros is a member of the Kruppel family of zinc finger DNA-binding proteins. The Ikaros protein contains two separate regions of zinc-finger domains: 4 DNA-binding zinc fingers near the N-terminus and 2 zinc fingers for protein-protein interactions near the C-terminus. Here, we identified the Ikaros gene from 14 vertebrate genomes and found Ikaros existed in all kinds of vertebrate including fish, amphibians, birds and mammals. Moreover, except rat and Xenopus tropicalis Ikaros proteins, which lack the first C2H2-type 1 Zinc finger region, all identified Ikaros proteins contain six C2H2-type 1 Zinc finger regions. We found human Ikaros gene showed a predominant expression in the liver, lymph node, thymus, intestine, lung, mammary gland, bone marrow, brain, heart, placenta and prostate. Moreover, four available SNPs disrupted an existing exonic splicing enhancer were identified in Ikaros. Besides the reported acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), the expression of Ikaros was related to the prognosis of 13 cases of cancers including blood cancers, breast, lung, ovarian and skin cancer. Moreover, the relationship between the expression of Ikaros and prognosis varied in different cancers, even in the same cancer from different database. Two tumor-related transcriptional factor (c-Fos and Elk-1) binding sites were identified within the 1.5-kb regions upstream of the transcriptional start site of human Ikaros, which may be involved in the effect of Ikaros in tumors.

Published
2010
Full Text
View/download PDF

5. Integrative genomic analyses on interferon-lambdas and their roles in cancer prediction.

Author

Yang L, Wei J, and He S

Subjects
Animals, Base Sequence, Binding Sites, Dogs, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Humans, Interferons genetics, Interleukins genetics, Mice, Molecular Sequence Data, Phylogeny, Predictive Value of Tests, Rats, Steroidogenic Factor 1 genetics, Comparative Genomic Hybridization methods, Cytokines genetics, Neoplasms genetics
Abstract

Interferon (IFN)-lambdas, including IFN-lambda1, IFN-lambda2, and IFN-lambda3, are a newly described group of cytokines distantly related to the type I IFNs and IL-10 family members. Besides the antiviral activity, IFN-lambdas were reported to inhibit various tumor growths in vitro and in vivo. Herein, we identified IFN-lambda genes from the genome sequences of the human, chimpanzee, macaque, orangutan, mouse, rat and dog, and found that the locations and copy of a specific IFN-lambda varied in different genomes, not just the copy of IFN-lambdas. We found human IFN-lambdas were expressed in fetal retina, fetal brain and T cells by ESTs search. Moreover, IFN-lambdas were also found to express in bladder cancer, blood cancer, breast cancer, glioma, head and neck cancer and lung cancer tissues. Three tumor-related transcriptional factors (steroidogenic factor-1, Wilms tumor 1 and P53) binding sites were identified within the 1.0-kb regions upstream of the transcriptional start site of human IFN-lambdas. Meta-analysis of the prognostic value of IFN-lambda genes in various cancers showed that the expression of IFN-lambdas are indeed related to the cancer prognosis in certain types of cancer. It can be predicted that IFN-lambdas take part in the cancer development by the regulation of expression of IFN-lambdas related to the SF-1, P53 and WT-1.

Published
2010

6. A loss-of-function RNA interference screen for molecular targets in cancer.

Author

Ngo VN, Davis RE, Lamy L, Yu X, Zhao H, Lenz G, Lam LT, Dave S, Yang L, Powell J, and Staudt LM

Subjects
Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing deficiency, Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing genetics, Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing metabolism, Apoptosis Regulatory Proteins deficiency, Apoptosis Regulatory Proteins genetics, Apoptosis Regulatory Proteins metabolism, B-Cell CLL-Lymphoma 10 Protein, CARD Signaling Adaptor Proteins, Caspases, Cell Line, Tumor, Cell Proliferation, Cell Survival genetics, Drug Design, Guanylate Cyclase deficiency, Guanylate Cyclase genetics, Guanylate Cyclase metabolism, Humans, Lymphoma, B-Cell genetics, Lymphoma, B-Cell metabolism, Lymphoma, B-Cell pathology, Lymphoma, B-Cell, Marginal Zone genetics, Lymphoma, B-Cell, Marginal Zone metabolism, Mucosa-Associated Lymphoid Tissue Lymphoma Translocation 1 Protein, NF-kappa B metabolism, Neoplasm Proteins deficiency, Neoplasm Proteins genetics, Neoplasm Proteins metabolism, Neoplasms pathology, Neoplasms therapy, Substrate Specificity, Neoplasms genetics, Neoplasms metabolism, RNA Interference
Abstract

The pursuit of novel therapeutic agents in cancer relies on the identification and validation of molecular targets. Hallmarks of cancer include self-sufficiency in growth signals and evasion from apoptosis; genes that regulate these processes may be optimal for therapeutic attack. Here we describe a loss-of-function screen for genes required for the proliferation and survival of cancer cells using an RNA interference library. We used a doxycycline-inducible retroviral vector for the expression of small hairpin RNAs (shRNAs) to construct a library targeting 2,500 human genes. We used retroviral pools from this library to infect cell lines representing two distinct molecular subgroups of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), termed activated B-cell-like DLBCL and germinal centre B-cell-like DLBCL. Each vector was engineered to contain a unique 60-base-pair 'bar code', allowing the abundance of an individual shRNA vector within a population of transduced cells to be measured using microarrays of the bar-code sequences. We observed that a subset of shRNA vectors was depleted from the transduced cells after three weeks in culture only if shRNA expression was induced. In activated B-cell-like DLBCL cells, but not germinal centre B-cell-like DLBCL cells, shRNAs targeting the NF-kappaB pathway were depleted, in keeping with the essential role of this pathway in the survival of activated B-cell-like DLBCL. This screen uncovered CARD11 as a key upstream signalling component responsible for the constitutive IkappaB kinase activity in activated B-cell-like DLBCL. The methodology that we describe can be used to establish a functional taxonomy of cancer and help reveal new classes of therapeutic targets distinct from known oncogenes.

Published
2006
Full Text
View/download PDF

7. Analysis of germline-driven ancestry-associated gene expression in cancers

Author

Chambwe, Nyasha, Sayaman, Rosalyn W, Hu, Donglei, Huntsman, Scott, Network, The Cancer Genome Analysis, Carrot-Zhang, Jian, Berger, Ashton C, Han, Seunghun, Meyerson, Matthew, Damrauer, Jeffrey S, Hoadley, Katherine A, Felau, Ina, Demchok, John A, Mensah, Michael KA, Tarnuzzer, Roy, Wang, Zhining, Yang, Liming, Knijnenburg, Theo A, Robertson, A Gordon, Yau, Christina, Benz, Christopher, Huang, Kuan-lin, Newberg, Justin Y, Frampton, Garrett M, Mashl, R Jay, Ding, Li, Romanel, Alessandro, Demichelis, Francesca, Zhou, Wanding, Laird, Peter W, Shen, Hui, Wong, Christopher K, Stuart, Joshua M, Lazar, Alexander J, Le, Xiuning, Oak, Ninad, Kemal, Anab, Caesar-Johnson, Samantha, Zenklusen, Jean C, Ziv, Elad, Beroukhim, Rameen, and Cherniack, Andrew D

Subjects
Biological Sciences, Health Sciences, Genetics, Human Genome, Cancer Genomics, Precision Medicine, Cancer, 1.1 Normal biological development and functioning, Good Health and Well Being, Gene Expression, Germ Cells, Humans, Neoplasms, Quantitative Trait Loci, RNA, Messenger, Cancer Genome Analysis Network, Bioinformatics, Computer sciences, Genomics, RNAseq, Sequence analysis
Abstract

Differential mRNA expression between ancestry groups can be explained by both genetic and environmental factors. We outline a computational workflow to determine the extent to which germline genetic variation explains cancer-specific molecular differences across ancestry groups. Using multi-omics datasets from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), we enumerate ancestry-informative markers colocalized with cancer-type-specific expression quantitative trait loci (e-QTLs) at ancestry-associated genes. This approach is generalizable to other settings with paired germline genotyping and mRNA expression data for a multi-ethnic cohort. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Carrot-Zhang et al. (2020), Robertson et al. (2021), and Sayaman et al. (2021).

Published
2022

8. Analytical protocol to identify local ancestry-associated molecular features in cancer

Author

Carrot-Zhang, Jian, Han, Seunghun, Zhou, Wanding, Damrauer, Jeffrey S, Kemal, Anab, Network, Cancer Genome Atlas Analysis, Berger, Ashton C, Meyerson, Matthew, Hoadley, Katherine A, Felau, Ina, Caesar-Johnson, Samantha, Demchok, John A, Mensah, Michael KA, Tarnuzzer, Roy, Wang, Zhining, Yang, Liming, Zenklusen, Jean C, Chambwe, Nyasha, Knijnenburg, Theo A, Robertson, A Gordon, Yau, Christina, Benz, Christopher, Huang, Kuan-lin, Newberg, Justin, Frampton, Garret, Mashl, R Jay, Ding, Li, Romanel, Alessandro, Demichelis, Francesca, Sayaman, Rosalyn W, Ziv, Elad, Laird, Peter W, Shen, Hui, Wong, Christopher K, Stuart, Joshua M, Lazar, Alexander J, Le, Xiuning, Oak, Ninad, Cherniack, Andrew D, and Beroukhim, Rameen

Subjects
Biological Sciences, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Genetics, Health Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Human Genome, Cancer Genomics, Health Disparities, Cancer, Minority Health, 4.1 Discovery and preclinical testing of markers and technologies, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Genetics, Population, Genome, Human, Genomics, Genotyping Techniques, Humans, Neoplasms, Phenotype, Cancer Genome Atlas Analysis Network, Bioinformatics
Abstract

People of different ancestries vary in cancer risk and outcome, and their molecular differences may indicate sources of these variations. Determining the "local" ancestry composition at each genetic locus across ancestry-admixed populations can suggest causal associations. We present a protocol to identify local ancestry and detect the associated molecular changes, using data from the Cancer Genome Atlas. This workflow can be applied to cancer cohorts with matched tumor and normal data from admixed patients to examine germline contributions to cancer. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Carrot-Zhang et al. (2020).

Published
2021

9. Comprehensive Analysis of Genetic Ancestry and Its Molecular Correlates in Cancer

Author

Carrot-Zhang, Jian, Chambwe, Nyasha, Damrauer, Jeffrey S, Knijnenburg, Theo A, Robertson, A Gordon, Yau, Christina, Zhou, Wanding, Berger, Ashton C, Huang, Kuan-lin, Newberg, Justin Y, Mashl, R Jay, Romanel, Alessandro, Sayaman, Rosalyn W, Demichelis, Francesca, Felau, Ina, Frampton, Garrett M, Han, Seunghun, Hoadley, Katherine A, Kemal, Anab, Laird, Peter W, Lazar, Alexander J, Le, Xiuning, Oak, Ninad, Shen, Hui, Wong, Christopher K, Zenklusen, Jean C, Ziv, Elad, Network, Cancer Genome Atlas Analysis, Aguet, Francois, Ding, Li, Demchok, John A, Mensah, Michael KA, Caesar-Johnson, Samantha, Tarnuzzer, Roy, Wang, Zhining, Yang, Liming, Alfoldi, Jessica, Karczewski, Konrad J, MacArthur, Daniel G, Meyerson, Matthew, Benz, Christopher, Stuart, Joshua M, Cherniack, Andrew D, and Beroukhim, Rameen

Subjects
Biological Sciences, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Genetics, Cancer, Urologic Diseases, Human Genome, Cancer Genomics, Biotechnology, DNA Methylation, DNA-Binding Proteins, Ethnicity, F-Box-WD Repeat-Containing Protein 7, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genetics, Population, Genome, Human, Genomics, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Humans, MicroRNAs, Mutation, Neoplasm Proteins, Neoplasms, Transcription Factors, Von Hippel-Lindau Tumor Suppressor Protein, Cancer Genome Atlas Analysis Network, TCGA, admixture, ancestry, cancer, eQTL, genomics, mRNA, methylation, miRNA, mutation, Neurosciences, Oncology & Carcinogenesis, Biochemistry and cell biology, Oncology and carcinogenesis
Abstract

We evaluated ancestry effects on mutation rates, DNA methylation, and mRNA and miRNA expression among 10,678 patients across 33 cancer types from The Cancer Genome Atlas. We demonstrated that cancer subtypes and ancestry-related technical artifacts are important confounders that have been insufficiently accounted for. Once accounted for, ancestry-associated differences spanned all molecular features and hundreds of genes. Biologically significant differences were usually tissue specific but not specific to cancer. However, admixture and pathway analyses suggested some of these differences are causally related to cancer. Specific findings included increased FBXW7 mutations in patients of African origin, decreased VHL and PBRM1 mutations in renal cancer patients of African origin, and decreased immune activity in bladder cancer patients of East Asian origin.

Published
2020

10. A Pan-Cancer Analysis Reveals High-Frequency Genetic Alterations in Mediators of Signaling by the TGF-β Superfamily

Author

Korkut, Anil, Zaidi, Sobia, Kanchi, Rupa S, Rao, Shuyun, Gough, Nancy R, Schultz, Andre, Li, Xubin, Lorenzi, Philip L, Berger, Ashton C, Robertson, Gordon, Kwong, Lawrence N, Datto, Mike, Roszik, Jason, Ling, Shiyun, Ravikumar, Visweswaran, Manyam, Ganiraju, Rao, Arvind, Shelley, Simon, Liu, Yuexin, Ju, Zhenlin, Hansel, Donna, de Velasco, Guillermo, Pennathur, Arjun, Andersen, Jesper B, O'Rourke, Colm J, Ohshiro, Kazufumi, Jogunoori, Wilma, Nguyen, Bao-Ngoc, Li, Shulin, Osmanbeyoglu, Hatice U, Ajani, Jaffer A, Mani, Sendurai A, Houseman, Andres, Wiznerowicz, Maciej, Chen, Jian, Gu, Shoujun, Ma, Wencai, Zhang, Jiexin, Tong, Pan, Cherniack, Andrew D, Deng, Chuxia, Resar, Linda, Network, The Cancer Genome Atlas Research, Caesar-Johnson, Samantha J, Demchok, John A, Felau, Ina, Kasapi, Melpomeni, Ferguson, Martin L, Hutter, Carolyn M, Sofia, Heidi J, Tarnuzzer, Roy, Wang, Zhining, Yang, Liming, Zenklusen, Jean C, Zhang, Jiashan, Chudamani, Sudha, Liu, Jia, Lolla, Laxmi, Naresh, Rashi, Pihl, Todd, Sun, Qiang, Wan, Yunhu, Wu, Ye, Cho, Juok, DeFreitas, Timothy, Frazer, Scott, Gehlenborg, Nils, Getz, Gad, Heiman, David I, Kim, Jaegil, Lawrence, Michael S, Lin, Pei, Meier, Sam, Noble, Michael S, Saksena, Gordon, Voet, Doug, Zhang, Hailei, Bernard, Brady, Chambwe, Nyasha, Dhankani, Varsha, Knijnenburg, Theo, Kramer, Roger, Leinonen, Kalle, Miller, Michael, Reynolds, Sheila, Shmulevich, Ilya, Thorsson, Vesteinn, Zhang, Wei, Akbani, Rehan, Broom, Bradley M, Hegde, Apurva M, Li, Jun, Liang, Han, Liu, Wenbin, and Lu, Yiling

Subjects
Biological Sciences, Genetics, Biotechnology, Cancer Genomics, Cancer, Human Genome, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Bone Morphogenetic Protein 5, DNA Methylation, Humans, MicroRNAs, Mutation Rate, Neoplasms, Receptor, Transforming Growth Factor-beta Type I, Signal Transduction, Smad Proteins, Transforming Growth Factor beta, Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, DNA methylation, Pan-Cancer, TCGA, TGF-β, TGF-β pathway, The Cancer Genome Atlas, cancer, microRNA, mutation hotspot, transcription, Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Biochemistry and cell biology
Abstract

We present an integromic analysis of gene alterations that modulate transforming growth factor β (TGF-β)-Smad-mediated signaling in 9,125 tumor samples across 33 cancer types in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Focusing on genes that encode mediators and regulators of TGF-β signaling, we found at least one genomic alteration (mutation, homozygous deletion, or amplification) in 39% of samples, with highest frequencies in gastrointestinal cancers. We identified mutation hotspots in genes that encode TGF-β ligands (BMP5), receptors (TGFBR2, AVCR2A, and BMPR2), and Smads (SMAD2 and SMAD4). Alterations in the TGF-β superfamily correlated positively with expression of metastasis-associated genes and with decreased survival. Correlation analyses showed the contributions of mutation, amplification, deletion, DNA methylation, and miRNA expression to transcriptional activity of TGF-β signaling in each cancer type. This study provides a broad molecular perspective relevant for future functional and therapeutic studies of the diverse cancer pathways mediated by the TGF-β superfamily.

Published
2018

11. Comprehensive Molecular Characterization of the Hippo Signaling Pathway in Cancer

Author

Wang, Yumeng, Xu, Xiaoyan, Maglic, Dejan, Dill, Michael T, Mojumdar, Kamalika, Ng, Patrick Kwok-Shing, Jeong, Kang Jin, Tsang, Yiu Huen, Moreno, Daniela, Bhavana, Venkata Hemanjani, Peng, Xinxin, Ge, Zhongqi, Chen, Hu, Li, Jun, Chen, Zhongyuan, Zhang, Huiwen, Han, Leng, Du, Di, Creighton, Chad J, Mills, Gordon B, Network, The Cancer Genome Atlas Research, Caesar-Johnson, Samantha J, Demchok, John A, Felau, Ina, Kasapi, Melpomeni, Ferguson, Martin L, Hutter, Carolyn M, Sofia, Heidi J, Tarnuzzer, Roy, Wang, Zhining, Yang, Liming, Zenklusen, Jean C, Zhang, Jiashan, Chudamani, Sudha, Liu, Jia, Lolla, Laxmi, Naresh, Rashi, Pihl, Todd, Sun, Qiang, Wan, Yunhu, Wu, Ye, Cho, Juok, DeFreitas, Timothy, Frazer, Scott, Gehlenborg, Nils, Getz, Gad, Heiman, David I, Kim, Jaegil, Lawrence, Michael S, Lin, Pei, Meier, Sam, Noble, Michael S, Saksena, Gordon, Voet, Doug, Zhang, Hailei, Bernard, Brady, Chambwe, Nyasha, Dhankani, Varsha, Knijnenburg, Theo, Kramer, Roger, Leinonen, Kalle, Liu, Yuexin, Miller, Michael, Reynolds, Sheila, Shmulevich, Ilya, Thorsson, Vesteinn, Zhang, Wei, Akbani, Rehan, Broom, Bradley M, Hegde, Apurva M, Ju, Zhenlin, Kanchi, Rupa S, Korkut, Anil, Liang, Han, Ling, Shiyun, Liu, Wenbin, Lu, Yiling, Ng, Kwok-Shing, Rao, Arvind, Ryan, Michael, Wang, Jing, Weinstein, John N, Zhang, Jiexin, Abeshouse, Adam, Armenia, Joshua, Chakravarty, Debyani, Chatila, Walid K, de Bruijn, Ino, Gao, Jianjiong, Gross, Benjamin E, Heins, Zachary J, Kundra, Ritika, La, Konnor, Ladanyi, Marc, Luna, Augustin, Nissan, Moriah G, Ochoa, Angelica, and Phillips, Sarah M

Subjects
Cancer, Genetics, Biotechnology, Human Genome, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, Base Sequence, Cell Line, Tumor, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Hippo Signaling Pathway, Humans, MicroRNAs, Models, Biological, Mutation, Neoplasms, Prognosis, Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases, Signal Transduction, Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, TAZ, TCGA, YAP, driver mutation, miRNA regulation, pan-cancer analysis, pathway activity, prognostic power, tumor subtype, Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Medical Physiology
Abstract

Hippo signaling has been recognized as a key tumor suppressor pathway. Here, we perform a comprehensive molecular characterization of 19 Hippo core genes in 9,125 tumor samples across 33 cancer types using multidimensional "omic" data from The Cancer Genome Atlas. We identify somatic drivers among Hippo genes and the related microRNA (miRNA) regulators, and using functional genomic approaches, we experimentally characterize YAP and TAZ mutation effects and miR-590 and miR-200a regulation for TAZ. Hippo pathway activity is best characterized by a YAP/TAZ transcriptional target signature of 22 genes, which shows robust prognostic power across cancer types. Our elastic-net integrated modeling further reveals cancer-type-specific pathway regulators and associated cancer drivers. Our results highlight the importance of Hippo signaling in squamous cell cancers, characterized by frequent amplification of YAP/TAZ, high expression heterogeneity, and significant prognostic patterns. This study represents a systems-biology approach to characterizing key cancer signaling pathways in the post-genomic era.

Published
2018

12. Pan-Cancer Analysis of lncRNA Regulation Supports Their Targeting of Cancer Genes in Each Tumor Context

Author

Chiu, Hua-Sheng, Somvanshi, Sonal, Patel, Ektaben, Chen, Ting-Wen, Singh, Vivek P, Zorman, Barry, Patil, Sagar L, Pan, Yinghong, Chatterjee, Sujash S, Network, The Cancer Genome Atlas Research, Caesar-Johnson, Samantha J, Demchok, John A, Felau, Ina, Kasapi, Melpomeni, Ferguson, Martin L, Hutter, Carolyn M, Sofia, Heidi J, Tarnuzzer, Roy, Wang, Zhining, Yang, Liming, Zenklusen, Jean C, Zhang, Jiashan, Chudamani, Sudha, Liu, Jia, Lolla, Laxmi, Naresh, Rashi, Pihl, Todd, Sun, Qiang, Wan, Yunhu, Wu, Ye, Cho, Juok, DeFreitas, Timothy, Frazer, Scott, Gehlenborg, Nils, Getz, Gad, Heiman, David I, Kim, Jaegil, Lawrence, Michael S, Lin, Pei, Meier, Sam, Noble, Michael S, Saksena, Gordon, Voet, Doug, Zhang, Hailei, Bernard, Brady, Chambwe, Nyasha, Dhankani, Varsha, Knijnenburg, Theo, Kramer, Roger, Leinonen, Kalle, Liu, Yuexin, Miller, Michael, Reynolds, Sheila, Shmulevich, Ilya, Thorsson, Vesteinn, Zhang, Wei, Akbani, Rehan, Broom, Bradley M, Hegde, Apurva M, Ju, Zhenlin, Kanchi, Rupa S, Korkut, Anil, Li, Jun, Liang, Han, Ling, Shiyun, Liu, Wenbin, Lu, Yiling, Mills, Gordon B, Ng, Kwok-Shing, Rao, Arvind, Ryan, Michael, Wang, Jing, Weinstein, John N, Zhang, Jiexin, Abeshouse, Adam, Armenia, Joshua, Chakravarty, Debyani, Chatila, Walid K, de Bruijn, Ino, Gao, Jianjiong, Gross, Benjamin E, Heins, Zachary J, Kundra, Ritika, La, Konnor, Ladanyi, Marc, Luna, Augustin, Nissan, Moriah G, Ochoa, Angelica, Phillips, Sarah M, Reznik, Ed, Sanchez-Vega, Francisco, Sander, Chris, Schultz, Nikolaus, Sheridan, Robert, Sumer, S Onur, Sun, Yichao, Taylor, Barry S, Wang, Jioajiao, Zhang, Hongxin, and Anur, Pavana

Subjects
Biological Sciences, Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Human Genome, Genetics, Biotechnology, Cancer Genomics, Breast Cancer, Women's Health, Cancer, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Cell Line, Cell Line, Tumor, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Gene Regulatory Networks, Genes, Tumor Suppressor, Humans, Neoplasms, Oncogenes, RNA, Long Noncoding, Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, RNA-binding proteins, cancer gene, interactome, lncRNA, microRNA, modulation, noncoding RNA, pan-cancer, regulation, Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Medical Physiology, Biological sciences
Abstract

Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) are commonly dysregulated in tumors, but only a handful are known to play pathophysiological roles in cancer. We inferred lncRNAs that dysregulate cancer pathways, oncogenes, and tumor suppressors (cancer genes) by modeling their effects on the activity of transcription factors, RNA-binding proteins, and microRNAs in 5,185 TCGA tumors and 1,019 ENCODE assays. Our predictions included hundreds of candidate onco- and tumor-suppressor lncRNAs (cancer lncRNAs) whose somatic alterations account for the dysregulation of dozens of cancer genes and pathways in each of 14 tumor contexts. To demonstrate proof of concept, we showed that perturbations targeting OIP5-AS1 (an inferred tumor suppressor) and TUG1 and WT1-AS (inferred onco-lncRNAs) dysregulated cancer genes and altered proliferation of breast and gynecologic cancer cells. Our analysis indicates that, although most lncRNAs are dysregulated in a tumor-specific manner, some, including OIP5-AS1, TUG1, NEAT1, MEG3, and TSIX, synergistically dysregulate cancer pathways in multiple tumor contexts.

Published
2018

13. Somatic Mutational Landscape of Splicing Factor Genes and Their Functional Consequences across 33 Cancer Types

Author

Seiler, Michael, Peng, Shouyong, Agrawal, Anant A, Palacino, James, Teng, Teng, Zhu, Ping, Smith, Peter G, Network, The Cancer Genome Atlas Research, Caesar-Johnson, Samantha J, Demchok, John A, Felau, Ina, Kasapi, Melpomeni, Ferguson, Martin L, Hutter, Carolyn M, Sofia, Heidi J, Tarnuzzer, Roy, Wang, Zhining, Yang, Liming, Zenklusen, Jean C, Zhang, Jiashan, Chudamani, Sudha, Liu, Jia, Lolla, Laxmi, Naresh, Rashi, Pihl, Todd, Sun, Qiang, Wan, Yunhu, Wu, Ye, Cho, Juok, DeFreitas, Timothy, Frazer, Scott, Gehlenborg, Nils, Getz, Gad, Heiman, David I, Kim, Jaegil, Lawrence, Michael S, Lin, Pei, Meier, Sam, Noble, Michael S, Saksena, Gordon, Voet, Doug, Zhang, Hailei, Bernard, Brady, Chambwe, Nyasha, Dhankani, Varsha, Knijnenburg, Theo, Kramer, Roger, Leinonen, Kalle, Liu, Yuexin, Miller, Michael, Reynolds, Sheila, Shmulevich, Ilya, Thorsson, Vesteinn, Zhang, Wei, Akbani, Rehan, Broom, Bradley M, Hegde, Apurva M, Ju, Zhenlin, Kanchi, Rupa S, Korkut, Anil, Li, Jun, Liang, Han, Ling, Shiyun, Liu, Wenbin, Lu, Yiling, Mills, Gordon B, Ng, Kwok-Shing, Rao, Arvind, Ryan, Michael, Wang, Jing, Weinstein, John N, Zhang, Jiexin, Abeshouse, Adam, Armenia, Joshua, Chakravarty, Debyani, Chatila, Walid K, de Bruijn, Ino, Gao, Jianjiong, Gross, Benjamin E, Heins, Zachary J, Kundra, Ritika, La, Konnor, Ladanyi, Marc, Luna, Augustin, Nissan, Moriah G, Ochoa, Angelica, Phillips, Sarah M, Reznik, Ed, Sanchez-Vega, Francisco, Sander, Chris, Schultz, Nikolaus, Sheridan, Robert, Sumer, S Onur, Sun, Yichao, Taylor, Barry S, Wang, Jioajiao, Zhang, Hongxin, Anur, Pavana, Peto, Myron, and Spellman, Paul

Subjects
Biological Sciences, Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Genetics, Human Genome, Cancer Genomics, Cancer, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Cell Line, Tumor, Genes, Tumor Suppressor, Humans, Loss of Function Mutation, Mutation Rate, Neoplasms, Oncogenes, RNA Splicing, RNA Splicing Factors, Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, FUBP1, RBM10, SF3B1, SRSF2, U2AF1, cancer, mutation, splicing, Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Medical Physiology, Biological sciences
Abstract

Hotspot mutations in splicing factor genes have been recently reported at high frequency in hematological malignancies, suggesting the importance of RNA splicing in cancer. We analyzed whole-exome sequencing data across 33 tumor types in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), and we identified 119 splicing factor genes with significant non-silent mutation patterns, including mutation over-representation, recurrent loss of function (tumor suppressor-like), or hotspot mutation profile (oncogene-like). Furthermore, RNA sequencing analysis revealed altered splicing events associated with selected splicing factor mutations. In addition, we were able to identify common gene pathway profiles associated with the presence of these mutations. Our analysis suggests that somatic alteration of genes involved in the RNA-splicing process is common in cancer and may represent an underappreciated hallmark of tumorigenesis.

Published
2018

14. Integrated Genomic Analysis of the Ubiquitin Pathway across Cancer Types

Author

Ge, Zhongqi, Leighton, Jake S, Wang, Yumeng, Peng, Xinxin, Chen, Zhongyuan, Chen, Hu, Sun, Yutong, Yao, Fan, Li, Jun, Zhang, Huiwen, Liu, Jianfang, Shriver, Craig D, Hu, Hai, Network, The Cancer Genome Atlas Research, Caesar-Johnson, Samantha J, Demchok, John A, Felau, Ina, Kasapi, Melpomeni, Ferguson, Martin L, Hutter, Carolyn M, Sofia, Heidi J, Tarnuzzer, Roy, Wang, Zhining, Yang, Liming, Zenklusen, Jean C, Zhang, Jiashan, Chudamani, Sudha, Liu, Jia, Lolla, Laxmi, Naresh, Rashi, Pihl, Todd, Sun, Qiang, Wan, Yunhu, Wu, Ye, Cho, Juok, DeFreitas, Timothy, Frazer, Scott, Gehlenborg, Nils, Getz, Gad, Heiman, David I, Kim, Jaegil, Lawrence, Michael S, Lin, Pei, Meier, Sam, Noble, Michael S, Saksena, Gordon, Voet, Doug, Zhang, Hailei, Bernard, Brady, Chambwe, Nyasha, Dhankani, Varsha, Knijnenburg, Theo, Kramer, Roger, Leinonen, Kalle, Liu, Yuexin, Miller, Michael, Reynolds, Sheila, Shmulevich, Ilya, Thorsson, Vesteinn, Zhang, Wei, Akbani, Rehan, Broom, Bradley M, Hegde, Apurva M, Ju, Zhenlin, Kanchi, Rupa S, Korkut, Anil, Liang, Han, Ling, Shiyun, Liu, Wenbin, Lu, Yiling, Mills, Gordon B, Ng, Kwok-Shing, Rao, Arvind, Ryan, Michael, Wang, Jing, Weinstein, John N, Zhang, Jiexin, Abeshouse, Adam, Armenia, Joshua, Chakravarty, Debyani, Chatila, Walid K, de Bruijn, Ino, Gao, Jianjiong, Gross, Benjamin E, Heins, Zachary J, Kundra, Ritika, La, Konnor, Ladanyi, Marc, Luna, Augustin, Nissan, Moriah G, Ochoa, Angelica, Phillips, Sarah M, Reznik, Ed, Sanchez-Vega, Francisco, Sander, Chris, Schultz, Nikolaus, Sheridan, Robert, Sumer, S Onur, and Sun, Yichao

Subjects
Biological Sciences, Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Human Genome, Genetics, Biotechnology, Cancer Genomics, Cancer, Good Health and Well Being, Cell Line, Tumor, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Genome, Human, Genomics, Humans, Metabolic Networks and Pathways, Neoplasms, Oncogene Proteins, Ubiquitination, Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, FBXW7, The Cancer Genome Atlas, biomarker, cancer prognosis, pan-cancer analysis, therapeutic targets, tumor subtype, ubiquitin pathway, Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Medical Physiology, Biological sciences
Abstract

Protein ubiquitination is a dynamic and reversible process of adding single ubiquitin molecules or various ubiquitin chains to target proteins. Here, using multidimensional omic data of 9,125 tumor samples across 33 cancer types from The Cancer Genome Atlas, we perform comprehensive molecular characterization of 929 ubiquitin-related genes and 95 deubiquitinase genes. Among them, we systematically identify top somatic driver candidates, including mutated FBXW7 with cancer-type-specific patterns and amplified MDM2 showing a mutually exclusive pattern with BRAF mutations. Ubiquitin pathway genes tend to be upregulated in cancer mediated by diverse mechanisms. By integrating pan-cancer multiomic data, we identify a group of tumor samples that exhibit worse prognosis. These samples are consistently associated with the upregulation of cell-cycle and DNA repair pathways, characterized by mutated TP53, MYC/TERT amplification, and APC/PTEN deletion. Our analysis highlights the importance of the ubiquitin pathway in cancer development and lays a foundation for developing relevant therapeutic strategies.

Published
2018

15. A Pan-Cancer Analysis of Enhancer Expression in Nearly 9000 Patient Samples

Author

Chen, Han, Li, Chunyan, Peng, Xinxin, Zhou, Zhicheng, Weinstein, John N, Network, The Cancer Genome Atlas Research, Caesar-Johnson, Samantha J, Demchok, John A, Felau, Ina, Kasapi, Melpomeni, Ferguson, Martin L, Hutter, Carolyn M, Sofia, Heidi J, Tarnuzzer, Roy, Wang, Zhining, Yang, Liming, Zenklusen, Jean C, Zhang, Jiashan, Chudamani, Sudha, Liu, Jia, Lolla, Laxmi, Naresh, Rashi, Pihl, Todd, Sun, Qiang, Wan, Yunhu, Wu, Ye, Cho, Juok, DeFreitas, Timothy, Frazer, Scott, Gehlenborg, Nils, Getz, Gad, Heiman, David I, Kim, Jaegil, Lawrence, Michael S, Lin, Pei, Meier, Sam, Noble, Michael S, Saksena, Gordon, Voet, Doug, Zhang, Hailei, Bernard, Brady, Chambwe, Nyasha, Dhankani, Varsha, Knijnenburg, Theo, Kramer, Roger, Leinonen, Kalle, Liu, Yuexin, Miller, Michael, Reynolds, Sheila, Shmulevich, Ilya, Thorsson, Vesteinn, Zhang, Wei, Akbani, Rehan, Broom, Bradley M, Hegde, Apurva M, Ju, Zhenlin, Kanchi, Rupa S, Korkut, Anil, Li, Jun, Liang, Han, Ling, Shiyun, Liu, Wenbin, Lu, Yiling, Mills, Gordon B, Ng, Kwok-Shing, Rao, Arvind, Ryan, Michael, Wang, Jing, Zhang, Jiexin, Abeshouse, Adam, Armenia, Joshua, Chakravarty, Debyani, Chatila, Walid K, de Bruijn, Ino, Gao, Jianjiong, Gross, Benjamin E, Heins, Zachary J, Kundra, Ritika, La, Konnor, Ladanyi, Marc, Luna, Augustin, Nissan, Moriah G, Ochoa, Angelica, Phillips, Sarah M, Reznik, Ed, Sanchez-Vega, Francisco, Sander, Chris, Schultz, Nikolaus, Sheridan, Robert, Sumer, S Onur, Sun, Yichao, Taylor, Barry S, Wang, Jioajiao, Zhang, Hongxin, Anur, Pavana, Peto, Myron, Spellman, Paul, Benz, Christopher, and Stuart, Joshua M

Subjects
Genetics, Cancer, Human Genome, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, Aneuploidy, B7-H1 Antigen, Chromatin, Databases, Genetic, Enhancer Elements, Genetic, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Humans, Immunotherapy, Neoplasms, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Survival Rate, Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, PD-L1 expression, The Cancer Genome Atlas, aneuploidy, chromatin state, enhancer expression, mutation burden, pan-cancer analysis, prognostic markers, Biological Sciences, Medical and Health Sciences, Developmental Biology
Abstract

The role of enhancers, a key class of non-coding regulatory DNA elements, in cancer development has increasingly been appreciated. Here, we present the detection and characterization of a large number of expressed enhancers in a genome-wide analysis of 8928 tumor samples across 33 cancer types using TCGA RNA-seq data. Compared with matched normal tissues, global enhancer activation was observed in most cancers. Across cancer types, global enhancer activity was positively associated with aneuploidy, but not mutation load, suggesting a hypothesis centered on "chromatin-state" to explain their interplay. Integrating eQTL, mRNA co-expression, and Hi-C data analysis, we developed a computational method to infer causal enhancer-gene interactions, revealing enhancers of clinically actionable genes. Having identified an enhancer ∼140 kb downstream of PD-L1, a major immunotherapy target, we validated it experimentally. This study provides a systematic view of enhancer activity in diverse tumor contexts and suggests the clinical implications of enhancers.

Published
2018

16. Spatial Organization and Molecular Correlation of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes Using Deep Learning on Pathology Images

Author

Saltz, Joel, Gupta, Rajarsi, Hou, Le, Kurc, Tahsin, Singh, Pankaj, Nguyen, Vu, Samaras, Dimitris, Shroyer, Kenneth R, Zhao, Tianhao, Batiste, Rebecca, Van Arnam, John, Network, The Cancer Genome Atlas Research, Caesar-Johnson, Samantha J, Demchok, John A, Felau, Ina, Kasapi, Melpomeni, Ferguson, Martin L, Hutter, Carolyn M, Sofia, Heidi J, Tarnuzzer, Roy, Wang, Zhining, Yang, Liming, Zenklusen, Jean C, Zhang, Jiashan, Chudamani, Sudha, Liu, Jia, Lolla, Laxmi, Naresh, Rashi, Pihl, Todd, Sun, Qiang, Wan, Yunhu, Wu, Ye, Cho, Juok, DeFreitas, Timothy, Frazer, Scott, Gehlenborg, Nils, Getz, Gad, Heiman, David I, Kim, Jaegil, Lawrence, Michael S, Lin, Pei, Meier, Sam, Noble, Michael S, Saksena, Gordon, Voet, Doug, Zhang, Hailei, Bernard, Brady, Chambwe, Nyasha, Dhankani, Varsha, Knijnenburg, Theo, Kramer, Roger, Leinonen, Kalle, Liu, Yuexin, Miller, Michael, Reynolds, Sheila, Shmulevich, Ilya, Thorsson, Vesteinn, Zhang, Wei, Akbani, Rehan, Broom, Bradley M, Hegde, Apurva M, Ju, Zhenlin, Kanchi, Rupa S, Korkut, Anil, Li, Jun, Liang, Han, Ling, Shiyun, Liu, Wenbin, Lu, Yiling, Mills, Gordon B, Ng, Kwok-Shing, Rao, Arvind, Ryan, Michael, Wang, Jing, Weinstein, John N, Zhang, Jiexin, Abeshouse, Adam, Armenia, Joshua, Chakravarty, Debyani, Chatila, Walid K, de Bruijn, Ino, Gao, Jianjiong, Gross, Benjamin E, Heins, Zachary J, Kundra, Ritika, La, Konnor, Ladanyi, Marc, Luna, Augustin, Nissan, Moriah G, Ochoa, Angelica, Phillips, Sarah M, Reznik, Ed, Sanchez-Vega, Francisco, Sander, Chris, Schultz, Nikolaus, Sheridan, Robert, Sumer, S Onur, Sun, Yichao, Taylor, Barry S, and Wang, Jioajiao

Subjects
Biological Sciences, Human Genome, Genetics, Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Information Technology R&D (NITRD), Cancer, Good Health and Well Being, Deep Learning, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Lymphocytes, Tumor-Infiltrating, Neoplasms, Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, artificial intelligence, bioinformatics, computer vision, deep learning, digital pathology, immuno-oncology, lymphocytes, machine learning, tumor microenvironment, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Medical Physiology, Biological sciences
Abstract

Beyond sample curation and basic pathologic characterization, the digitized H&E-stained images of TCGA samples remain underutilized. To highlight this resource, we present mappings of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) based on H&E images from 13 TCGA tumor types. These TIL maps are derived through computational staining using a convolutional neural network trained to classify patches of images. Affinity propagation revealed local spatial structure in TIL patterns and correlation with overall survival. TIL map structural patterns were grouped using standard histopathological parameters. These patterns are enriched in particular T cell subpopulations derived from molecular measures. TIL densities and spatial structure were differentially enriched among tumor types, immune subtypes, and tumor molecular subtypes, implying that spatial infiltrate state could reflect particular tumor cell aberration states. Obtaining spatial lymphocytic patterns linked to the rich genomic characterization of TCGA samples demonstrates one use for the TCGA image archives with insights into the tumor-immune microenvironment.

Published
2018

17. The Immune Landscape of Cancer

Author

Thorsson, Vésteinn, Gibbs, David L, Brown, Scott D, Wolf, Denise, Bortone, Dante S, Ou Yang, Tai-Hsien, Porta-Pardo, Eduard, Gao, Galen F, Plaisier, Christopher L, Eddy, James A, Ziv, Elad, Culhane, Aedin C, Paull, Evan O, Sivakumar, IK Ashok, Gentles, Andrew J, Malhotra, Raunaq, Farshidfar, Farshad, Colaprico, Antonio, Parker, Joel S, Mose, Lisle E, Vo, Nam Sy, Liu, Jianfang, Liu, Yuexin, Rader, Janet, Dhankani, Varsha, Reynolds, Sheila M, Bowlby, Reanne, Califano, Andrea, Cherniack, Andrew D, Anastassiou, Dimitris, Bedognetti, Davide, Mokrab, Younes, Newman, Aaron M, Rao, Arvind, Chen, Ken, Krasnitz, Alexander, Hu, Hai, Malta, Tathiane M, Noushmehr, Houtan, Pedamallu, Chandra Sekhar, Bullman, Susan, Ojesina, Akinyemi I, Lamb, Andrew, Zhou, Wanding, Shen, Hui, Choueiri, Toni K, Weinstein, John N, Guinney, Justin, Saltz, Joel, Holt, Robert A, Rabkin, Charles S, Lazar, Alexander J, Serody, Jonathan S, Demicco, Elizabeth G, Disis, Mary L, Vincent, Benjamin G, Shmulevich, Ilya, Caesar-Johnson, Samantha J, Demchok, John A, Felau, Ina, Kasapi, Melpomeni, Ferguson, Martin L, Hutter, Carolyn M, Sofia, Heidi J, Tarnuzzer, Roy, Wang, Zhining, Yang, Liming, Zenklusen, Jean C, Zhang, Jiashan Julia, Chudamani, Sudha, Liu, Jia, Lolla, Laxmi, Naresh, Rashi, Pihl, Todd, Sun, Qiang, Wan, Yunhu, Wu, Ye, Cho, Juok, DeFreitas, Timothy, Frazer, Scott, Gehlenborg, Nils, Getz, Gad, Heiman, David I, Kim, Jaegil, Lawrence, Michael S, Lin, Pei, Meier, Sam, Noble, Michael S, Saksena, Gordon, Voet, Doug, Zhang, Hailei, Bernard, Brady, Chambwe, Nyasha, Knijnenburg, Theo, Kramer, Roger, Leinonen, Kalle, Miller, Michael, and Reynolds, Sheila

Subjects
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Immunology, Cancer, Genetics, Immunotherapy, Human Genome, Cancer Genomics, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Inflammatory and immune system, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Child, Female, Genomics, Humans, Interferon-gamma, Macrophages, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Prognosis, Th1-Th2 Balance, Transforming Growth Factor beta, Wound Healing, Young Adult, Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, cancer genomics, immune subtypes, immuno-oncology, immunomodulatory, immunotherapy, integrative network analysis, tumor immunology, tumor microenvironment
Abstract

We performed an extensive immunogenomic analysis of more than 10,000 tumors comprising 33 diverse cancer types by utilizing data compiled by TCGA. Across cancer types, we identified six immune subtypes-wound healing, IFN-γ dominant, inflammatory, lymphocyte depleted, immunologically quiet, and TGF-β dominant-characterized by differences in macrophage or lymphocyte signatures, Th1:Th2 cell ratio, extent of intratumoral heterogeneity, aneuploidy, extent of neoantigen load, overall cell proliferation, expression of immunomodulatory genes, and prognosis. Specific driver mutations correlated with lower (CTNNB1, NRAS, or IDH1) or higher (BRAF, TP53, or CASP8) leukocyte levels across all cancers. Multiple control modalities of the intracellular and extracellular networks (transcription, microRNAs, copy number, and epigenetic processes) were involved in tumor-immune cell interactions, both across and within immune subtypes. Our immunogenomics pipeline to characterize these heterogeneous tumors and the resulting data are intended to serve as a resource for future targeted studies to further advance the field.

Published
2018

18. Oncogenic Signaling Pathways in The Cancer Genome Atlas

Author

Sanchez-Vega, Francisco, Mina, Marco, Armenia, Joshua, Chatila, Walid K, Luna, Augustin, La, Konnor C, Dimitriadoy, Sofia, Liu, David L, Kantheti, Havish S, Saghafinia, Sadegh, Chakravarty, Debyani, Daian, Foysal, Gao, Qingsong, Bailey, Matthew H, Liang, Wen-Wei, Foltz, Steven M, Shmulevich, Ilya, Ding, Li, Heins, Zachary, Ochoa, Angelica, Gross, Benjamin, Gao, Jianjiong, Zhang, Hongxin, Kundra, Ritika, Kandoth, Cyriac, Bahceci, Istemi, Dervishi, Leonard, Dogrusoz, Ugur, Zhou, Wanding, Shen, Hui, Laird, Peter W, Way, Gregory P, Greene, Casey S, Liang, Han, Xiao, Yonghong, Wang, Chen, Iavarone, Antonio, Berger, Alice H, Bivona, Trever G, Lazar, Alexander J, Hammer, Gary D, Giordano, Thomas, Kwong, Lawrence N, McArthur, Grant, Huang, Chenfei, Tward, Aaron D, Frederick, Mitchell J, McCormick, Frank, Meyerson, Matthew, Network, The Cancer Genome Atlas Research, Caesar-Johnson, Samantha J, Demchok, John A, Felau, Ina, Kasapi, Melpomeni, Ferguson, Martin L, Hutter, Carolyn M, Sofia, Heidi J, Tarnuzzer, Roy, Wang, Zhining, Yang, Liming, Zenklusen, Jean C, Zhang, Jiashan, Chudamani, Sudha, Liu, Jia, Lolla, Laxmi, Naresh, Rashi, Pihl, Todd, Sun, Qiang, Wan, Yunhu, Wu, Ye, Cho, Juok, DeFreitas, Timothy, Frazer, Scott, Gehlenborg, Nils, Getz, Gad, Heiman, David I, Kim, Jaegil, Lawrence, Michael S, Lin, Pei, Meier, Sam, Noble, Michael S, Saksena, Gordon, Voet, Doug, Zhang, Hailei, Bernard, Brady, Chambwe, Nyasha, Dhankani, Varsha, Knijnenburg, Theo, Kramer, Roger, Leinonen, Kalle, Liu, Yuexin, Miller, Michael, Reynolds, Sheila, Thorsson, Vesteinn, Zhang, Wei, Akbani, Rehan, Broom, Bradley M, Hegde, Apurva M, and Ju, Zhenlin

Subjects
Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Biological Sciences, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Genetics, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Human Genome, Cancer Genomics, Cancer, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Good Health and Well Being, Databases, Genetic, Genes, Neoplasm, Humans, Neoplasms, Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases, Signal Transduction, Transforming Growth Factor beta, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53, Wnt Proteins, Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, PanCanAtlas, TCGA, cancer genome atlas, cancer genomics, combination therapy, pan-cancer, precision oncology, signaling pathways, therapeutics, whole exome sequencing, Medical and Health Sciences, Developmental Biology, Biological sciences, Biomedical and clinical sciences
Abstract

Genetic alterations in signaling pathways that control cell-cycle progression, apoptosis, and cell growth are common hallmarks of cancer, but the extent, mechanisms, and co-occurrence of alterations in these pathways differ between individual tumors and tumor types. Using mutations, copy-number changes, mRNA expression, gene fusions and DNA methylation in 9,125 tumors profiled by The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), we analyzed the mechanisms and patterns of somatic alterations in ten canonical pathways: cell cycle, Hippo, Myc, Notch, Nrf2, PI-3-Kinase/Akt, RTK-RAS, TGFβ signaling, p53 and β-catenin/Wnt. We charted the detailed landscape of pathway alterations in 33 cancer types, stratified into 64 subtypes, and identified patterns of co-occurrence and mutual exclusivity. Eighty-nine percent of tumors had at least one driver alteration in these pathways, and 57% percent of tumors had at least one alteration potentially targetable by currently available drugs. Thirty percent of tumors had multiple targetable alterations, indicating opportunities for combination therapy.

Published
2018

19. Machine Learning Identifies Stemness Features Associated with Oncogenic Dedifferentiation

Author

Malta, Tathiane M, Sokolov, Artem, Gentles, Andrew J, Burzykowski, Tomasz, Poisson, Laila, Weinstein, John N, Kamińska, Bożena, Huelsken, Joerg, Omberg, Larsson, Gevaert, Olivier, Colaprico, Antonio, Czerwińska, Patrycja, Mazurek, Sylwia, Mishra, Lopa, Heyn, Holger, Krasnitz, Alex, Godwin, Andrew K, Lazar, Alexander J, Network, The Cancer Genome Atlas Research, Caesar-Johnson, Samantha J, Demchok, John A, Felau, Ina, Kasapi, Melpomeni, Ferguson, Martin L, Hutter, Carolyn M, Sofia, Heidi J, Tarnuzzer, Roy, Wang, Zhining, Yang, Liming, Zenklusen, Jean C, Zhang, Jiashan, Chudamani, Sudha, Liu, Jia, Lolla, Laxmi, Naresh, Rashi, Pihl, Todd, Sun, Qiang, Wan, Yunhu, Wu, Ye, Cho, Juok, DeFreitas, Timothy, Frazer, Scott, Gehlenborg, Nils, Getz, Gad, Heiman, David I, Kim, Jaegil, Lawrence, Michael S, Lin, Pei, Meier, Sam, Noble, Michael S, Saksena, Gordon, Voet, Doug, Zhang, Hailei, Bernard, Brady, Chambwe, Nyasha, Dhankani, Varsha, Knijnenburg, Theo, Kramer, Roger, Leinonen, Kalle, Liu, Yuexin, Miller, Michael, Reynolds, Sheila, Shmulevich, Ilya, Thorsson, Vesteinn, Zhang, Wei, Akbani, Rehan, Broom, Bradley M, Hegde, Apurva M, Ju, Zhenlin, Kanchi, Rupa S, Korkut, Anil, Li, Jun, Liang, Han, Ling, Shiyun, Liu, Wenbin, Lu, Yiling, Mills, Gordon B, Ng, Kwok-Shing, Rao, Arvind, Ryan, Michael, Wang, Jing, Zhang, Jiexin, Abeshouse, Adam, Armenia, Joshua, Chakravarty, Debyani, Chatila, Walid K, de Bruijn, Ino, Gao, Jianjiong, Gross, Benjamin E, Heins, Zachary J, Kundra, Ritika, La, Konnor, Ladanyi, Marc, Luna, Augustin, Nissan, Moriah G, Ochoa, Angelica, Phillips, Sarah M, Reznik, Ed, and Sanchez-Vega, Francisco

Subjects
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Immunology, Human Genome, Genetics, Cancer Genomics, Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence, Stem Cell Research - Nonembryonic - Human, Stem Cell Research, Stem Cell Research - Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell, Stem Cell Research - Nonembryonic - Non-Human, Rare Diseases, Cancer, Good Health and Well Being, Carcinogenesis, Cell Dedifferentiation, DNA Methylation, Databases, Genetic, Epigenesis, Genetic, Humans, Machine Learning, MicroRNAs, Neoplasm Metastasis, Neoplasms, Stem Cells, Transcriptome, Tumor Microenvironment, Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, The Cancer Genome Atlas, cancer stem cells, dedifferentiation, epigenomic, genomic, machine learning, pan-cancer, stemness, Biological Sciences, Medical and Health Sciences, Developmental Biology, Biological sciences, Biomedical and clinical sciences
Abstract

Cancer progression involves the gradual loss of a differentiated phenotype and acquisition of progenitor and stem-cell-like features. Here, we provide novel stemness indices for assessing the degree of oncogenic dedifferentiation. We used an innovative one-class logistic regression (OCLR) machine-learning algorithm to extract transcriptomic and epigenetic feature sets derived from non-transformed pluripotent stem cells and their differentiated progeny. Using OCLR, we were able to identify previously undiscovered biological mechanisms associated with the dedifferentiated oncogenic state. Analyses of the tumor microenvironment revealed unanticipated correlation of cancer stemness with immune checkpoint expression and infiltrating immune cells. We found that the dedifferentiated oncogenic phenotype was generally most prominent in metastatic tumors. Application of our stemness indices to single-cell data revealed patterns of intra-tumor molecular heterogeneity. Finally, the indices allowed for the identification of novel targets and possible targeted therapies aimed at tumor differentiation.

Published
2018

20. Perspective on Oncogenic Processes at the End of the Beginning of Cancer Genomics

Author

Ding, Li, Bailey, Matthew H, Porta-Pardo, Eduard, Thorsson, Vesteinn, Colaprico, Antonio, Bertrand, Denis, Gibbs, David L, Weerasinghe, Amila, Huang, Kuan-lin, Tokheim, Collin, Cortés-Ciriano, Isidro, Jayasinghe, Reyka, Chen, Feng, Yu, Lihua, Sun, Sam, Olsen, Catharina, Kim, Jaegil, Taylor, Alison M, Cherniack, Andrew D, Akbani, Rehan, Suphavilai, Chayaporn, Nagarajan, Niranjan, Stuart, Joshua M, Mills, Gordon B, Wyczalkowski, Matthew A, Vincent, Benjamin G, Hutter, Carolyn M, Zenklusen, Jean Claude, Hoadley, Katherine A, Wendl, Michael C, Shmulevich, llya, Lazar, Alexander J, Wheeler, David A, Getz, Gad, Network, The Cancer Genome Atlas Research, Caesar-Johnson, Samantha J, Demchok, John A, Felau, Ina, Kasapi, Melpomeni, Ferguson, Martin L, Sofia, Heidi J, Tarnuzzer, Roy, Wang, Zhining, Yang, Liming, Zenklusen, Jean C, Zhang, Jiashan, Chudamani, Sudha, Liu, Jia, Lolla, Laxmi, Naresh, Rashi, Pihl, Todd, Sun, Qiang, Wan, Yunhu, Wu, Ye, Cho, Juok, DeFreitas, Timothy, Frazer, Scott, Gehlenborg, Nils, Heiman, David I, Lawrence, Michael S, Lin, Pei, Meier, Sam, Noble, Michael S, Saksena, Gordon, Voet, Doug, Zhang, Hailei, Bernard, Brady, Chambwe, Nyasha, Dhankani, Varsha, Knijnenburg, Theo, Kramer, Roger, Leinonen, Kalle, Liu, Yuexin, Miller, Michael, Reynolds, Sheila, Shmulevich, Ilya, Zhang, Wei, Broom, Bradley M, Hegde, Apurva M, Ju, Zhenlin, Kanchi, Rupa S, Korkut, Anil, Li, Jun, Liang, Han, Ling, Shiyun, Liu, Wenbin, Lu, Yiling, Ng, Kwok-Shing, Rao, Arvind, Ryan, Michael, Wang, Jing, Weinstein, John N, Zhang, Jiexin, and Abeshouse, Adam

Subjects
Biological Sciences, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Genetics, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Human Genome, Biotechnology, Cancer Genomics, Cancer, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Good Health and Well Being, Carcinogenesis, DNA Repair, Databases, Genetic, Genes, Neoplasm, Genomics, Humans, Metabolic Networks and Pathways, Microsatellite Instability, Mutation, Neoplasms, Transcriptome, Tumor Microenvironment, Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, TCGA, cancer, cancer genomics, omics, oncogenic process, Medical and Health Sciences, Developmental Biology, Biological sciences, Biomedical and clinical sciences
Abstract

The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) has catalyzed systematic characterization of diverse genomic alterations underlying human cancers. At this historic junction marking the completion of genomic characterization of over 11,000 tumors from 33 cancer types, we present our current understanding of the molecular processes governing oncogenesis. We illustrate our insights into cancer through synthesis of the findings of the TCGA PanCancer Atlas project on three facets of oncogenesis: (1) somatic driver mutations, germline pathogenic variants, and their interactions in the tumor; (2) the influence of the tumor genome and epigenome on transcriptome and proteome; and (3) the relationship between tumor and the microenvironment, including implications for drugs targeting driver events and immunotherapies. These results will anchor future characterization of rare and common tumor types, primary and relapsed tumors, and cancers across ancestry groups and will guide the deployment of clinical genomic sequencing.

Published
2018

21. Comprehensive Characterization of Cancer Driver Genes and Mutations

Author

Bailey, Matthew H, Tokheim, Collin, Porta-Pardo, Eduard, Sengupta, Sohini, Bertrand, Denis, Weerasinghe, Amila, Colaprico, Antonio, Wendl, Michael C, Kim, Jaegil, Reardon, Brendan, Ng, Patrick Kwok-Shing, Jeong, Kang Jin, Cao, Song, Wang, Zixing, Gao, Jianjiong, Gao, Qingsong, Wang, Fang, Liu, Eric Minwei, Mularoni, Loris, Rubio-Perez, Carlota, Nagarajan, Niranjan, Cortés-Ciriano, Isidro, Zhou, Daniel Cui, Liang, Wen-Wei, Hess, Julian M, Yellapantula, Venkata D, Tamborero, David, Gonzalez-Perez, Abel, Suphavilai, Chayaporn, Ko, Jia Yu, Khurana, Ekta, Park, Peter J, Van Allen, Eliezer M, Liang, Han, Group, The MC3 Working, Network, The Cancer Genome Atlas Research, Caesar-Johnson, Samantha J, Demchok, John A, Felau, Ina, Kasapi, Melpomeni, Ferguson, Martin L, Hutter, Carolyn M, Sofia, Heidi J, Tarnuzzer, Roy, Wang, Zhining, Yang, Liming, Zenklusen, Jean C, Zhang, Jiashan, Chudamani, Sudha, Liu, Jia, Lolla, Laxmi, Naresh, Rashi, Pihl, Todd, Sun, Qiang, Wan, Yunhu, Wu, Ye, Cho, Juok, DeFreitas, Timothy, Frazer, Scott, Gehlenborg, Nils, Getz, Gad, Heiman, David I, Lawrence, Michael S, Lin, Pei, Meier, Sam, Noble, Michael S, Saksena, Gordon, Voet, Doug, Zhang, Hailei, Bernard, Brady, Chambwe, Nyasha, Dhankani, Varsha, Knijnenburg, Theo, Kramer, Roger, Leinonen, Kalle, Liu, Yuexin, Miller, Michael, Reynolds, Sheila, Shmulevich, Ilya, Thorsson, Vesteinn, Zhang, Wei, Akbani, Rehan, Broom, Bradley M, Hegde, Apurva M, Ju, Zhenlin, Kanchi, Rupa S, Korkut, Anil, Li, Jun, Ling, Shiyun, Liu, Wenbin, Lu, Yiling, Mills, Gordon B, Ng, Kwok-Shing, Rao, Arvind, Ryan, Michael, Wang, Jing, Weinstein, John N, and Zhang, Jiexin

Subjects
Biological Sciences, Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Genetic Testing, Precision Medicine, Cancer, Genetics, Networking and Information Technology R&D (NITRD), Cancer Genomics, Human Genome, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Good Health and Well Being, Algorithms, B7-H1 Antigen, Computational Biology, Databases, Genetic, Entropy, Humans, Microsatellite Instability, Mutation, Neoplasms, Principal Component Analysis, Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor, MC3 Working Group, Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, driver gene discovery, mutations of clinical relevance, oncology, structure analysis, Medical and Health Sciences, Developmental Biology, Biological sciences, Biomedical and clinical sciences
Abstract

Identifying molecular cancer drivers is critical for precision oncology. Multiple advanced algorithms to identify drivers now exist, but systematic attempts to combine and optimize them on large datasets are few. We report a PanCancer and PanSoftware analysis spanning 9,423 tumor exomes (comprising all 33 of The Cancer Genome Atlas projects) and using 26 computational tools to catalog driver genes and mutations. We identify 299 driver genes with implications regarding their anatomical sites and cancer/cell types. Sequence- and structure-based analyses identified >3,400 putative missense driver mutations supported by multiple lines of evidence. Experimental validation confirmed 60%-85% of predicted mutations as likely drivers. We found that >300 MSI tumors are associated with high PD-1/PD-L1, and 57% of tumors analyzed harbor putative clinically actionable events. Our study represents the most comprehensive discovery of cancer genes and mutations to date and will serve as a blueprint for future biological and clinical endeavors.

Published
2018

22. Cell-of-Origin Patterns Dominate the Molecular Classification of 10,000 Tumors from 33 Types of Cancer

Author

Hoadley, Katherine A, Yau, Christina, Hinoue, Toshinori, Wolf, Denise M, Lazar, Alexander J, Drill, Esther, Shen, Ronglai, Taylor, Alison M, Cherniack, Andrew D, Thorsson, Vésteinn, Akbani, Rehan, Bowlby, Reanne, Wong, Christopher K, Wiznerowicz, Maciej, Sanchez-Vega, Francisco, Robertson, A Gordon, Schneider, Barbara G, Lawrence, Michael S, Noushmehr, Houtan, Malta, Tathiane M, Network, The Cancer Genome Atlas, Caesar-Johnson, Samantha J, Demchok, John A, Felau, Ina, Kasapi, Melpomeni, Ferguson, Martin L, Hutter, Carolyn M, Sofia, Heidi J, Tarnuzzer, Roy, Wang, Zhining, Yang, Liming, Zenklusen, Jean C, Zhang, Jiashan, Chudamani, Sudha, Liu, Jia, Lolla, Laxmi, Naresh, Rashi, Pihl, Todd, Sun, Qiang, Wan, Yunhu, Wu, Ye, Cho, Juok, DeFreitas, Timothy, Frazer, Scott, Gehlenborg, Nils, Getz, Gad, Heiman, David I, Kim, Jaegil, Lin, Pei, Meier, Sam, Noble, Michael S, Saksena, Gordon, Voet, Doug, Zhang, Hailei, Bernard, Brady, Chambwe, Nyasha, Dhankani, Varsha, Knijnenburg, Theo, Kramer, Roger, Leinonen, Kalle, Liu, Yuexin, Miller, Michael, Reynolds, Sheila, Shmulevich, Ilya, Thorsson, Vesteinn, Zhang, Wei, Broom, Bradley M, Hegde, Apurva M, Ju, Zhenlin, Kanchi, Rupa S, Korkut, Anil, Li, Jun, Liang, Han, Ling, Shiyun, Liu, Wenbin, Lu, Yiling, Mills, Gordon B, Ng, Kwok-Shing, Rao, Arvind, Ryan, Michael, Wang, Jing, Weinstein, John N, Zhang, Jiexin, Abeshouse, Adam, Armenia, Joshua, Chakravarty, Debyani, Chatila, Walid K, de Bruijn, Ino, Gao, Jianjiong, Gross, Benjamin E, Heins, Zachary J, Kundra, Ritika, La, Konnor, Ladanyi, Marc, Luna, Augustin, Nissan, Moriah G, Ochoa, Angelica, and Phillips, Sarah M

Subjects
Biological Sciences, Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Genetics, Human Genome, Biotechnology, Cancer Genomics, Networking and Information Technology R&D (NITRD), Cancer, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aneuploidy, Chromosomes, Cluster Analysis, CpG Islands, DNA Methylation, Databases, Factual, Humans, MicroRNAs, Mutation, Neoplasm Proteins, Neoplasms, RNA, Messenger, Cancer Genome Atlas Network, TCGA, cancer, cell-of-origin, genome, methylome, organs, proteome, subtypes, tissues, transcriptome, Medical and Health Sciences, Developmental Biology, Biological sciences, Biomedical and clinical sciences
Abstract

We conducted comprehensive integrative molecular analyses of the complete set of tumors in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), consisting of approximately 10,000 specimens and representing 33 types of cancer. We performed molecular clustering using data on chromosome-arm-level aneuploidy, DNA hypermethylation, mRNA, and miRNA expression levels and reverse-phase protein arrays, of which all, except for aneuploidy, revealed clustering primarily organized by histology, tissue type, or anatomic origin. The influence of cell type was evident in DNA-methylation-based clustering, even after excluding sites with known preexisting tissue-type-specific methylation. Integrative clustering further emphasized the dominant role of cell-of-origin patterns. Molecular similarities among histologically or anatomically related cancer types provide a basis for focused pan-cancer analyses, such as pan-gastrointestinal, pan-gynecological, pan-kidney, and pan-squamous cancers, and those related by stemness features, which in turn may inform strategies for future therapeutic development.

Published
2018

23. Pathogenic Germline Variants in 10,389 Adult Cancers

Author

Huang, Kuan-lin, Mashl, R Jay, Wu, Yige, Ritter, Deborah I, Wang, Jiayin, Oh, Clara, Paczkowska, Marta, Reynolds, Sheila, Wyczalkowski, Matthew A, Oak, Ninad, Scott, Adam D, Krassowski, Michal, Cherniack, Andrew D, Houlahan, Kathleen E, Jayasinghe, Reyka, Wang, Liang-Bo, Zhou, Daniel Cui, Liu, Di, Cao, Song, Kim, Young Won, Koire, Amanda, McMichael, Joshua F, Hucthagowder, Vishwanathan, Kim, Tae-Beom, Hahn, Abigail, Wang, Chen, McLellan, Michael D, Al-Mulla, Fahd, Johnson, Kimberly J, Network, The Cancer Genome Atlas Research, Caesar-Johnson, Samantha J, Demchok, John A, Felau, Ina, Kasapi, Melpomeni, Ferguson, Martin L, Hutter, Carolyn M, Sofia, Heidi J, Tarnuzzer, Roy, Wang, Zhining, Yang, Liming, Zenklusen, Jean C, Zhang, Jiashan, Chudamani, Sudha, Liu, Jia, Lolla, Laxmi, Naresh, Rashi, Pihl, Todd, Sun, Qiang, Wan, Yunhu, Wu, Ye, Cho, Juok, DeFreitas, Timothy, Frazer, Scott, Gehlenborg, Nils, Getz, Gad, Heiman, David I, Kim, Jaegil, Lawrence, Michael S, Lin, Pei, Meier, Sam, Noble, Michael S, Saksena, Gordon, Voet, Doug, Zhang, Hailei, Bernard, Brady, Chambwe, Nyasha, Dhankani, Varsha, Knijnenburg, Theo, Kramer, Roger, Leinonen, Kalle, Liu, Yuexin, Miller, Michael, Shmulevich, Ilya, Thorsson, Vesteinn, Zhang, Wei, Akbani, Rehan, Broom, Bradley M, Hegde, Apurva M, Ju, Zhenlin, Kanchi, Rupa S, Korkut, Anil, Li, Jun, Liang, Han, Ling, Shiyun, Liu, Wenbin, Lu, Yiling, Mills, Gordon B, Ng, Kwok-Shing, Rao, Arvind, Ryan, Michael, Wang, Jing, Weinstein, John N, Zhang, Jiexin, Abeshouse, Adam, Armenia, Joshua, Chakravarty, Debyani, Chatila, Walid K, de Bruijn, Ino, and Gao, Jianjiong

Subjects
Biological Sciences, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Genetics, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Human Genome, Cancer Genomics, Prevention, Rare Diseases, Cancer, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, DNA Copy Number Variations, Databases, Genetic, Gene Deletion, Gene Frequency, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genotype, Germ Cells, Germ-Line Mutation, Humans, Loss of Heterozygosity, Mutation, Missense, Neoplasms, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-met, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-ret, Tumor Suppressor Proteins, Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, LOH, cancer predisposition, germline and somatic genomes, variant pathogenicity, Medical and Health Sciences, Developmental Biology, Biological sciences, Biomedical and clinical sciences
Abstract

We conducted the largest investigation of predisposition variants in cancer to date, discovering 853 pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in 8% of 10,389 cases from 33 cancer types. Twenty-one genes showed single or cross-cancer associations, including novel associations of SDHA in melanoma and PALB2 in stomach adenocarcinoma. The 659 predisposition variants and 18 additional large deletions in tumor suppressors, including ATM, BRCA1, and NF1, showed low gene expression and frequent (43%) loss of heterozygosity or biallelic two-hit events. We also discovered 33 such variants in oncogenes, including missenses in MET, RET, and PTPN11 associated with high gene expression. We nominated 47 additional predisposition variants from prioritized VUSs supported by multiple evidences involving case-control frequency, loss of heterozygosity, expression effect, and co-localization with mutations and modified residues. Our integrative approach links rare predisposition variants to functional consequences, informing future guidelines of variant classification and germline genetic testing in cancer.

Published
2018

24. Systematic Analysis of Splice-Site-Creating Mutations in Cancer

Author

Jayasinghe, Reyka G, Cao, Song, Gao, Qingsong, Wendl, Michael C, Vo, Nam Sy, Reynolds, Sheila M, Zhao, Yanyan, Climente-González, Héctor, Chai, Shengjie, Wang, Fang, Varghese, Rajees, Huang, Mo, Liang, Wen-Wei, Wyczalkowski, Matthew A, Sengupta, Sohini, Li, Zhi, Payne, Samuel H, Fenyö, David, Miner, Jeffrey H, Walter, Matthew J, Network, The Cancer Genome Atlas Research, Caesar-Johnson, Samantha J, Demchok, John A, Felau, Ina, Kasapi, Melpomeni, Ferguson, Martin L, Hutter, Carolyn M, Sofia, Heidi J, Tarnuzzer, Roy, Wang, Zhining, Yang, Liming, Zenklusen, Jean C, Zhang, Jiashan, Chudamani, Sudha, Liu, Jia, Lolla, Laxmi, Naresh, Rashi, Pihl, Todd, Sun, Qiang, Wan, Yunhu, Wu, Ye, Cho, Juok, DeFreitas, Timothy, Frazer, Scott, Gehlenborg, Nils, Getz, Gad, Heiman, David I, Kim, Jaegil, Lawrence, Michael S, Lin, Pei, Meier, Sam, Noble, Michael S, Saksena, Gordon, Voet, Doug, Zhang, Hailei, Bernard, Brady, Chambwe, Nyasha, Dhankani, Varsha, Knijnenburg, Theo, Kramer, Roger, Leinonen, Kalle, Liu, Yuexin, Miller, Michael, Reynolds, Sheila, Shmulevich, Ilya, Thorsson, Vesteinn, Zhang, Wei, Akbani, Rehan, Broom, Bradley M, Hegde, Apurva M, Ju, Zhenlin, Kanchi, Rupa S, Korkut, Anil, Li, Jun, Liang, Han, Ling, Shiyun, Liu, Wenbin, Lu, Yiling, Mills, Gordon B, Ng, Kwok-Shing, Rao, Arvind, Ryan, Michael, Wang, Jing, Weinstein, John N, Zhang, Jiexin, Abeshouse, Adam, Armenia, Joshua, Chakravarty, Debyani, Chatila, Walid K, de Bruijn, Ino, Gao, Jianjiong, Gross, Benjamin E, Heins, Zachary J, Kundra, Ritika, La, Konnor, Ladanyi, Marc, Luna, Augustin, Nissan, Moriah G, Ochoa, Angelica, and Phillips, Sarah M

Subjects
Biological Sciences, Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Human Genome, Genetics, Cancer Genomics, Immunotherapy, Rare Diseases, Cancer, 5.1 Pharmaceuticals, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, BRCA1 Protein, GATA3 Transcription Factor, HEK293 Cells, Humans, Mutation, Neoplasms, Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase-1, Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor, RNA Splice Sites, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53, X-linked Nuclear Protein, Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, RNA, mutations of clinical relevance, splicing, Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Medical Physiology, Biological sciences
Abstract

For the past decade, cancer genomic studies have focused on mutations leading to splice-site disruption, overlooking those having splice-creating potential. Here, we applied a bioinformatic tool, MiSplice, for the large-scale discovery of splice-site-creating mutations (SCMs) across 8,656 TCGA tumors. We report 1,964 originally mis-annotated mutations having clear evidence of creating alternative splice junctions. TP53 and GATA3 have 26 and 18 SCMs, respectively, and ATRX has 5 from lower-grade gliomas. Mutations in 11 genes, including PARP1, BRCA1, and BAP1, were experimentally validated for splice-site-creating function. Notably, we found that neoantigens induced by SCMs are likely several folds more immunogenic compared to missense mutations, exemplified by the recurrent GATA3 SCM. Further, high expression of PD-1 and PD-L1 was observed in tumors with SCMs, suggesting candidates for immune blockade therapy. Our work highlights the importance of integrating DNA and RNA data for understanding the functional and the clinical implications of mutations in human diseases.

Published
2018

25. Driver Fusions and Their Implications in the Development and Treatment of Human Cancers

Author

Gao, Qingsong, Liang, Wen-Wei, Foltz, Steven M, Mutharasu, Gnanavel, Jayasinghe, Reyka G, Cao, Song, Liao, Wen-Wei, Reynolds, Sheila M, Wyczalkowski, Matthew A, Yao, Lijun, Yu, Lihua, Sun, Sam Q, Group, The Fusion Analysis Working, Network, The Cancer Genome Atlas Research, Caesar-Johnson, Samantha J, Demchok, John A, Felau, Ina, Kasapi, Melpomeni, Ferguson, Martin L, Hutter, Carolyn M, Sofia, Heidi J, Tarnuzzer, Roy, Wang, Zhining, Yang, Liming, Zenklusen, Jean C, Zhang, Jiashan, Chudamani, Sudha, Liu, Jia, Lolla, Laxmi, Naresh, Rashi, Pihl, Todd, Sun, Qiang, Wan, Yunhu, Wu, Ye, Cho, Juok, DeFreitas, Timothy, Frazer, Scott, Gehlenborg, Nils, Getz, Gad, Heiman, David I, Kim, Jaegil, Lawrence, Michael S, Lin, Pei, Meier, Sam, Noble, Michael S, Saksena, Gordon, Voet, Doug, Zhang, Hailei, Bernard, Brady, Chambwe, Nyasha, Dhankani, Varsha, Knijnenburg, Theo, Kramer, Roger, Leinonen, Kalle, Liu, Yuexin, Miller, Michael, Reynolds, Sheila, Shmulevich, Ilya, Thorsson, Vesteinn, Zhang, Wei, Akbani, Rehan, Broom, Bradley M, Hegde, Apurva M, Ju, Zhenlin, Kanchi, Rupa S, Korkut, Anil, Li, Jun, Liang, Han, Ling, Shiyun, Liu, Wenbin, Lu, Yiling, Mills, Gordon B, Ng, Kwok-Shing, Rao, Arvind, Ryan, Michael, Wang, Jing, Weinstein, John N, Zhang, Jiexin, Abeshouse, Adam, Armenia, Joshua, Chakravarty, Debyani, Chatila, Walid K, de Bruijn, Ino, Gao, Jianjiong, Gross, Benjamin E, Heins, Zachary J, Kundra, Ritika, La, Konnor, Ladanyi, Marc, Luna, Augustin, Nissan, Moriah G, Ochoa, Angelica, Phillips, Sarah M, Reznik, Ed, Sanchez-Vega, Francisco, Sander, Chris, Schultz, Nikolaus, Sheridan, Robert, Sumer, S Onur, and Sun, Yichao

Subjects
Biological Sciences, Human Genome, Genetics, Digestive Diseases, Biotechnology, Cancer Genomics, Rare Diseases, Cancer, 5.1 Pharmaceuticals, Good Health and Well Being, Antineoplastic Agents, Carcinogenesis, Cell Line, Tumor, Humans, Molecular Targeted Therapy, Neoplasms, Oncogene Fusion, Oncogene Proteins, Fusion, Fusion Analysis Working Group, Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, RNA, cancer, fusion, gene fusions, translocation, Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Medical Physiology, Biological sciences
Abstract

Gene fusions represent an important class of somatic alterations in cancer. We systematically investigated fusions in 9,624 tumors across 33 cancer types using multiple fusion calling tools. We identified a total of 25,664 fusions, with a 63% validation rate. Integration of gene expression, copy number, and fusion annotation data revealed that fusions involving oncogenes tend to exhibit increased expression, whereas fusions involving tumor suppressors have the opposite effect. For fusions involving kinases, we found 1,275 with an intact kinase domain, the proportion of which varied significantly across cancer types. Our study suggests that fusions drive the development of 16.5% of cancer cases and function as the sole driver in more than 1% of them. Finally, we identified druggable fusions involving genes such as TMPRSS2, RET, FGFR3, ALK, and ESR1 in 6.0% of cases, and we predicted immunogenic peptides, suggesting that fusions may provide leads for targeted drug and immune therapy.

Published
2018

26. Molecular Characterization and Clinical Relevance of Metabolic Expression Subtypes in Human Cancers

Author

Peng, Xinxin, Chen, Zhongyuan, Farshidfar, Farshad, Xu, Xiaoyan, Lorenzi, Philip L, Wang, Yumeng, Cheng, Feixiong, Tan, Lin, Mojumdar, Kamalika, Du, Di, Ge, Zhongqi, Li, Jun, Thomas, George V, Birsoy, Kivanc, Liu, Lingxiang, Zhang, Huiwen, Zhao, Zhongming, Marchand, Calena, Weinstein, John N, Network, The Cancer Genome Atlas Research, Caesar-Johnson, Samantha J, Demchok, John A, Felau, Ina, Kasapi, Melpomeni, Ferguson, Martin L, Hutter, Carolyn M, Sofia, Heidi J, Tarnuzzer, Roy, Wang, Zhining, Yang, Liming, Zenklusen, Jean C, Zhang, Jiashan, Chudamani, Sudha, Liu, Jia, Lolla, Laxmi, Naresh, Rashi, Pihl, Todd, Sun, Qiang, Wan, Yunhu, Wu, Ye, Cho, Juok, DeFreitas, Timothy, Frazer, Scott, Gehlenborg, Nils, Getz, Gad, Heiman, David I, Kim, Jaegil, Lawrence, Michael S, Lin, Pei, Meier, Sam, Noble, Michael S, Saksena, Gordon, Voet, Doug, Zhang, Hailei, Bernard, Brady, Chambwe, Nyasha, Dhankani, Varsha, Knijnenburg, Theo, Kramer, Roger, Leinonen, Kalle, Liu, Yuexin, Miller, Michael, Reynolds, Sheila, Shmulevich, Ilya, Thorsson, Vesteinn, Zhang, Wei, Akbani, Rehan, Broom, Bradley M, Hegde, Apurva M, Ju, Zhenlin, Kanchi, Rupa S, Korkut, Anil, Liang, Han, Ling, Shiyun, Liu, Wenbin, Lu, Yiling, Mills, Gordon B, Ng, Kwok-Shing, Rao, Arvind, Ryan, Michael, Wang, Jing, Zhang, Jiexin, Abeshouse, Adam, Armenia, Joshua, Chakravarty, Debyani, Chatila, Walid K, de Bruijn, Ino, Gao, Jianjiong, Gross, Benjamin E, Heins, Zachary J, Kundra, Ritika, La, Konnor, Ladanyi, Marc, Luna, Augustin, Nissan, Moriah G, Ochoa, Angelica, Phillips, Sarah M, and Reznik, Ed

Subjects
Biological Sciences, Human Genome, Genetics, Cancer Genomics, Nutrition, Cancer, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Cell Line, Tumor, Core Binding Factor Alpha 2 Subunit, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm, HEK293 Cells, Humans, Metabolic Networks and Pathways, Neoplasms, Snail Family Transcription Factors, Transcriptome, Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, The Cancer Genome Atlas, carbohydrate metabolism, drug sensitivity, master regulator, prognostic markers, somatic drivers, therapeutic targets, tumor subtypes, Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Medical Physiology, Biological sciences
Abstract

Metabolic reprogramming provides critical information for clinical oncology. Using molecular data of 9,125 patient samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas, we identified tumor subtypes in 33 cancer types based on mRNA expression patterns of seven major metabolic processes and assessed their clinical relevance. Our metabolic expression subtypes correlated extensively with clinical outcome: subtypes with upregulated carbohydrate, nucleotide, and vitamin/cofactor metabolism most consistently correlated with worse prognosis, whereas subtypes with upregulated lipid metabolism showed the opposite. Metabolic subtypes correlated with diverse somatic drivers but exhibited effects convergent on cancer hallmark pathways and were modulated by highly recurrent master regulators across cancer types. As a proof-of-concept example, we demonstrated that knockdown of SNAI1 or RUNX1-master regulators of carbohydrate metabolic subtypes-modulates metabolic activity and drug sensitivity. Our study provides a system-level view of metabolic heterogeneity within and across cancer types and identifies pathway cross-talk, suggesting related prognostic, therapeutic, and predictive utility.

Published
2018

27. Machine Learning Detects Pan-cancer Ras Pathway Activation in The Cancer Genome Atlas

Author

Way, Gregory P, Sanchez-Vega, Francisco, La, Konnor, Armenia, Joshua, Chatila, Walid K, Luna, Augustin, Sander, Chris, Cherniack, Andrew D, Mina, Marco, Ciriello, Giovanni, Schultz, Nikolaus, Network, The Cancer Genome Atlas Research, Caesar-Johnson, Samantha J, Demchok, John A, Felau, Ina, Kasapi, Melpomeni, Ferguson, Martin L, Hutter, Carolyn M, Sofia, Heidi J, Tarnuzzer, Roy, Wang, Zhining, Yang, Liming, Zenklusen, Jean C, Zhang, Jiashan, Chudamani, Sudha, Liu, Jia, Lolla, Laxmi, Naresh, Rashi, Pihl, Todd, Sun, Qiang, Wan, Yunhu, Wu, Ye, Cho, Juok, DeFreitas, Timothy, Frazer, Scott, Gehlenborg, Nils, Getz, Gad, Heiman, David I, Kim, Jaegil, Lawrence, Michael S, Lin, Pei, Meier, Sam, Noble, Michael S, Saksena, Gordon, Voet, Doug, Zhang, Hailei, Bernard, Brady, Chambwe, Nyasha, Dhankani, Varsha, Knijnenburg, Theo, Kramer, Roger, Leinonen, Kalle, Liu, Yuexin, Miller, Michael, Reynolds, Sheila, Shmulevich, Ilya, Thorsson, Vesteinn, Zhang, Wei, Akbani, Rehan, Broom, Bradley M, Hegde, Apurva M, Ju, Zhenlin, Kanchi, Rupa S, Korkut, Anil, Li, Jun, Liang, Han, Ling, Shiyun, Liu, Wenbin, Lu, Yiling, Mills, Gordon B, Ng, Kwok-Shing, Rao, Arvind, Ryan, Michael, Wang, Jing, Weinstein, John N, Zhang, Jiexin, Abeshouse, Adam, Chakravarty, Debyani, de Bruijn, Ino, Gao, Jianjiong, Gross, Benjamin E, Heins, Zachary J, Kundra, Ritika, Ladanyi, Marc, Nissan, Moriah G, Ochoa, Angelica, Phillips, Sarah M, Reznik, Ed, Sheridan, Robert, Sumer, S Onur, Sun, Yichao, Taylor, Barry S, and Wang, Jioajiao

Subjects
Biological Sciences, Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Genetics, Human Genome, Cancer Genomics, Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence, Precision Medicine, Networking and Information Technology R&D (NITRD), Cancer, Good Health and Well Being, Cell Line, Tumor, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Genome, Human, Humans, Machine Learning, Neoplasms, Signal Transduction, ras Proteins, Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, Gene expression, HRAS, KRAS, NF1, NRAS, Ras, TCGA, drug sensitivity, machine learning, pan-cancer, Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Medical Physiology, Biological sciences
Abstract

Precision oncology uses genomic evidence to match patients with treatment but often fails to identify all patients who may respond. The transcriptome of these "hidden responders" may reveal responsive molecular states. We describe and evaluate a machine-learning approach to classify aberrant pathway activity in tumors, which may aid in hidden responder identification. The algorithm integrates RNA-seq, copy number, and mutations from 33 different cancer types across The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) PanCanAtlas project to predict aberrant molecular states in tumors. Applied to the Ras pathway, the method detects Ras activation across cancer types and identifies phenocopying variants. The model, trained on human tumors, can predict response to MEK inhibitors in wild-type Ras cell lines. We also present data that suggest that multiple hits in the Ras pathway confer increased Ras activity. The transcriptome is underused in precision oncology and, combined with machine learning, can aid in the identification of hidden responders.

Published
2018

28. An Integrated TCGA Pan-Cancer Clinical Data Resource to Drive High-Quality Survival Outcome Analytics

Author

Liu, Jianfang, Lichtenberg, Tara, Hoadley, Katherine A, Poisson, Laila M, Lazar, Alexander J, Cherniack, Andrew D, Kovatich, Albert J, Benz, Christopher C, Levine, Douglas A, Lee, Adrian V, Omberg, Larsson, Wolf, Denise M, Shriver, Craig D, Thorsson, Vesteinn, Network, The Cancer Genome Atlas Research, Caesar-Johnson, Samantha J, Demchok, John A, Felau, Ina, Kasapi, Melpomeni, Ferguson, Martin L, Hutter, Carolyn M, Sofia, Heidi J, Tarnuzzer, Roy, Wang, Zhining, Yang, Liming, Zenklusen, Jean C, Zhang, Jiashan, Chudamani, Sudha, Liu, Jia, Lolla, Laxmi, Naresh, Rashi, Pihl, Todd, Sun, Qiang, Wan, Yunhu, Wu, Ye, Cho, Juok, DeFreitas, Timothy, Frazer, Scott, Gehlenborg, Nils, Getz, Gad, Heiman, David I, Kim, Jaegil, Lawrence, Michael S, Lin, Pei, Meier, Sam, Noble, Michael S, Saksena, Gordon, Voet, Doug, Zhang, Hailei, Bernard, Brady, Chambwe, Nyasha, Dhankani, Varsha, Knijnenburg, Theo, Kramer, Roger, Leinonen, Kalle, Liu, Yuexin, Miller, Michael, Reynolds, Sheila, Shmulevich, Ilya, Zhang, Wei, Akbani, Rehan, Broom, Bradley M, Hegde, Apurva M, Ju, Zhenlin, Kanchi, Rupa S, Korkut, Anil, Li, Jun, Liang, Han, Ling, Shiyun, Liu, Wenbin, Lu, Yiling, Mills, Gordon B, Ng, Kwok-Shing, Rao, Arvind, Ryan, Michael, Wang, Jing, Weinstein, John N, Zhang, Jiexin, Abeshouse, Adam, Armenia, Joshua, Chakravarty, Debyani, Chatila, Walid K, de Bruijn, Ino, Gao, Jianjiong, Gross, Benjamin E, Heins, Zachary J, Kundra, Ritika, La, Konnor, Ladanyi, Marc, Luna, Augustin, Nissan, Moriah G, Ochoa, Angelica, Phillips, Sarah M, Reznik, Ed, Sanchez-Vega, Francisco, Sander, Chris, Schultz, Nikolaus, Sheridan, Robert, and Sumer, S Onur

Subjects
Biological Sciences, Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Human Genome, Genetics, Biotechnology, Cancer Genomics, Precision Medicine, Networking and Information Technology R&D (NITRD), Women's Health, Cancer, Good Health and Well Being, Databases, Genetic, Genomics, Humans, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Neoplasms, Proportional Hazards Models, Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, Cox proportional hazards regression model, TCGA, The Cancer Genome Atlas, clinical data resource, disease-free interval, disease-specific survival, follow-up time, overall survival, progression-free interval, translational research, Medical and Health Sciences, Developmental Biology, Biological sciences, Biomedical and clinical sciences
Abstract

For a decade, The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) program collected clinicopathologic annotation data along with multi-platform molecular profiles of more than 11,000 human tumors across 33 different cancer types. TCGA clinical data contain key features representing the democratized nature of the data collection process. To ensure proper use of this large clinical dataset associated with genomic features, we developed a standardized dataset named the TCGA Pan-Cancer Clinical Data Resource (TCGA-CDR), which includes four major clinical outcome endpoints. In addition to detailing major challenges and statistical limitations encountered during the effort of integrating the acquired clinical data, we present a summary that includes endpoint usage recommendations for each cancer type. These TCGA-CDR findings appear to be consistent with cancer genomics studies independent of the TCGA effort and provide opportunities for investigating cancer biology using clinical correlates at an unprecedented scale.

Published
2018

29. Genomic and Molecular Landscape of DNA Damage Repair Deficiency across The Cancer Genome Atlas

Author

Knijnenburg, Theo A, Wang, Linghua, Zimmermann, Michael T, Chambwe, Nyasha, Gao, Galen F, Cherniack, Andrew D, Fan, Huihui, Shen, Hui, Way, Gregory P, Greene, Casey S, Liu, Yuexin, Akbani, Rehan, Feng, Bin, Donehower, Lawrence A, Miller, Chase, Shen, Yang, Karimi, Mostafa, Chen, Haoran, Kim, Pora, Jia, Peilin, Shinbrot, Eve, Zhang, Shaojun, Liu, Jianfang, Hu, Hai, Bailey, Matthew H, Yau, Christina, Wolf, Denise, Zhao, Zhongming, Weinstein, John N, Li, Lei, Ding, Li, Mills, Gordon B, Laird, Peter W, Wheeler, David A, Shmulevich, Ilya, Network, The Cancer Genome Atlas Research, Caesar-Johnson, Samantha J, Demchok, John A, Felau, Ina, Kasapi, Melpomeni, Ferguson, Martin L, Hutter, Carolyn M, Sofia, Heidi J, Tarnuzzer, Roy, Wang, Zhining, Yang, Liming, Zenklusen, Jean C, Zhang, Jiashan, Chudamani, Sudha, Liu, Jia, Lolla, Laxmi, Naresh, Rashi, Pihl, Todd, Sun, Qiang, Wan, Yunhu, Wu, Ye, Cho, Juok, DeFreitas, Timothy, Frazer, Scott, Gehlenborg, Nils, Getz, Gad, Heiman, David I, Kim, Jaegil, Lawrence, Michael S, Lin, Pei, Meier, Sam, Noble, Michael S, Saksena, Gordon, Voet, Doug, Zhang, Hailei, Bernard, Brady, Dhankani, Varsha, Knijnenburg, Theo, Kramer, Roger, Leinonen, Kalle, Miller, Michael, Reynolds, Sheila, Thorsson, Vesteinn, Zhang, Wei, Broom, Bradley M, Hegde, Apurva M, Ju, Zhenlin, Kanchi, Rupa S, Korkut, Anil, Li, Jun, Liang, Han, Ling, Shiyun, Liu, Wenbin, Lu, Yiling, Ng, Kwok-Shing, Rao, Arvind, Ryan, Michael, Wang, Jing, and Zhang, Jiexin

Subjects
Biological Sciences, Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Genetics, Human Genome, Orphan Drug, Cancer Genomics, Ovarian Cancer, Rare Diseases, Women's Health, Cancer, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Cell Line, Tumor, DNA Damage, Gene Silencing, Genome, Human, Humans, Loss of Heterozygosity, Machine Learning, Mutation, Neoplasms, Recombinational DNA Repair, Tumor Suppressor Proteins, Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, DNA damage footprints, DNA damage repair, The Cancer Genome Atlas PanCanAtlas project, epigenetic silencing, integrative statistical analysis, mutational signatures, protein structure analysis, somatic copy-number alterations, somatic mutations, Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Medical Physiology, Biological sciences
Abstract

DNA damage repair (DDR) pathways modulate cancer risk, progression, and therapeutic response. We systematically analyzed somatic alterations to provide a comprehensive view of DDR deficiency across 33 cancer types. Mutations with accompanying loss of heterozygosity were observed in over 1/3 of DDR genes, including TP53 and BRCA1/2. Other prevalent alterations included epigenetic silencing of the direct repair genes EXO5, MGMT, and ALKBH3 in ∼20% of samples. Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) was present at varying frequency in many cancer types, most notably ovarian cancer. However, in contrast to ovarian cancer, HRD was associated with worse outcomes in several other cancers. Protein structure-based analyses allowed us to predict functional consequences of rare, recurrent DDR mutations. A new machine-learning-based classifier developed from gene expression data allowed us to identify alterations that phenocopy deleterious TP53 mutations. These frequent DDR gene alterations in many human cancers have functional consequences that may determine cancer progression and guide therapy.

Published
2018

30. Scalable Open Science Approach for Mutation Calling of Tumor Exomes Using Multiple Genomic Pipelines

Author

Ellrott, Kyle, Bailey, Matthew H, Saksena, Gordon, Covington, Kyle R, Kandoth, Cyriac, Stewart, Chip, Hess, Julian, Ma, Chiotti, Kami E, McLellan, Michael, Sofia, Heidi J, Hutter, Carolyn, Getz, Gad, Wheeler, David, Ding, Li, Group, MC3 Working, Network, The Cancer Genome Atlas Research, Caesar-Johnson, Samantha J, Demchok, John A, Felau, Ina, Kasapi, Melpomeni, Ferguson, Martin L, Hutter, Carolyn M, Tarnuzzer, Roy, Wang, Zhining, Yang, Liming, Zenklusen, Jean C, Zhang, Jiashan, Chudamani, Sudha, Liu, Jia, Lolla, Laxmi, Naresh, Rashi, Pihl, Todd, Sun, Qiang, Wan, Yunhu, Wu, Ye, Cho, Juok, DeFreitas, Timothy, Frazer, Scott, Gehlenborg, Nils, Heiman, David I, Kim, Jaegil, Lawrence, Michael S, Lin, Pei, Meier, Sam, Noble, Michael S, Voet, Doug, Zhang, Hailei, Bernard, Brady, Chambwe, Nyasha, Dhankani, Varsha, Knijnenburg, Theo, Kramer, Roger, Leinonen, Kalle, Liu, Yuexin, Miller, Michael, Reynolds, Sheila, Shmulevich, Ilya, Thorsson, Vesteinn, Zhang, Wei, Akbani, Rehan, Broom, Bradley M, Hegde, Apurva M, Ju, Zhenlin, Kanchi, Rupa S, Korkut, Anil, Li, Jun, Liang, Han, Ling, Shiyun, Liu, Wenbin, Lu, Yiling, Mills, Gordon B, Ng, Kwok-Shing, Rao, Arvind, Ryan, Michael, Wang, Jing, Weinstein, John N, Zhang, Jiexin, Abeshouse, Adam, Armenia, Joshua, Chakravarty, Debyani, Chatila, Walid K, de Bruijn, Ino, Gao, Jianjiong, Gross, Benjamin E, Heins, Zachary J, Kundra, Ritika, La, Konnor, Ladanyi, Marc, Luna, Augustin, Nissan, Moriah G, Ochoa, Angelica, Phillips, Sarah M, Reznik, Ed, Sanchez-Vega, Francisco, Sander, Chris, and Schultz, Nikolaus

Subjects
Biological Sciences, Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Genetics, Rare Diseases, Cancer Genomics, Genetic Testing, Networking and Information Technology R&D (NITRD), Cancer, Human Genome, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Good Health and Well Being, Algorithms, Exome, Genomics, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Humans, Information Dissemination, Mutation, Neoplasms, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Software, Exome Sequencing, MC3 Working Group, Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, PanCanAtlas project, TCGA, large-scale, open science, pan-cancer, reproducible computing, somatic mutation calling, Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Biochemistry and cell biology
Abstract

The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cancer genomics dataset includes over 10,000 tumor-normal exome pairs across 33 different cancer types, in total >400 TB of raw data files requiring analysis. Here we describe the Multi-Center Mutation Calling in Multiple Cancers project, our effort to generate a comprehensive encyclopedia of somatic mutation calls for the TCGA data to enable robust cross-tumor-type analyses. Our approach accounts for variance and batch effects introduced by the rapid advancement of DNA extraction, hybridization-capture, sequencing, and analysis methods over time. We present best practices for applying an ensemble of seven mutation-calling algorithms with scoring and artifact filtering. The dataset created by this analysis includes 3.5 million somatic variants and forms the basis for PanCan Atlas papers. The results have been made available to the research community along with the methods used to generate them. This project is the result of collaboration from a number of institutes and demonstrates how team science drives extremely large genomics projects.

Published
2018

31. Pan-cancer Alterations of the MYC Oncogene and Its Proximal Network across the Cancer Genome Atlas

Author

Schaub, Franz X, Dhankani, Varsha, Berger, Ashton C, Trivedi, Mihir, Richardson, Anne B, Shaw, Reid, Zhao, Wei, Zhang, Xiaoyang, Ventura, Andrea, Liu, Yuexin, Ayer, Donald E, Hurlin, Peter J, Cherniack, Andrew D, Eisenman, Robert N, Bernard, Brady, Grandori, Carla, Network, The Cancer Genome Atlas, Caesar-Johnson, Samantha J, Demchok, John A, Felau, Ina, Kasapi, Melpomeni, Ferguson, Martin L, Hutter, Carolyn M, Sofia, Heidi J, Tarnuzzer, Roy, Wang, Zhining, Yang, Liming, Zenklusen, Jean C, Zhang, Jiashan, Chudamani, Sudha, Liu, Jia, Lolla, Laxmi, Naresh, Rashi, Pihl, Todd, Sun, Qiang, Wan, Yunhu, Wu, Ye, Cho, Juok, DeFreitas, Timothy, Frazer, Scott, Gehlenborg, Nils, Getz, Gad, Heiman, David I, Kim, Jaegil, Lawrence, Michael S, Lin, Pei, Meier, Sam, Noble, Michael S, Saksena, Gordon, Voet, Doug, Zhang, Hailei, Chambwe, Nyasha, Knijnenburg, Theo, Kramer, Roger, Leinonen, Kalle, Miller, Michael, Reynolds, Sheila, Shmulevich, Ilya, Thorsson, Vesteinn, Zhang, Wei, Akbani, Rehan, Broom, Bradley M, Hegde, Apurva M, Ju, Zhenlin, Kanchi, Rupa S, Korkut, Anil, Li, Jun, Liang, Han, Ling, Shiyun, Liu, Wenbin, Lu, Yiling, Mills, Gordon B, Ng, Kwok-Shing, Rao, Arvind, Ryan, Michael, Wang, Jing, Weinstein, John N, Zhang, Jiexin, Abeshouse, Adam, Armenia, Joshua, Chakravarty, Debyani, Chatila, Walid K, de Bruijn, Ino, Gao, Jianjiong, Gross, Benjamin E, Heins, Zachary J, Kundra, Ritika, La, Konnor, Ladanyi, Marc, Luna, Augustin, Nissan, Moriah G, Ochoa, Angelica, Phillips, Sarah M, Reznik, Ed, Sanchez-Vega, Francisco, Sander, Chris, and Schultz, Nikolaus

Subjects
Biological Sciences, Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Cancer Genomics, Genetics, Cancer, Human Genome, Biotechnology, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Leucine Zipper Transcription Factors, Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors, Biomarkers, Tumor, Carcinogenesis, Chromatin, Computational Biology, Genes, myc, Genomics, Humans, Neoplasms, Oncogenes, Proteomics, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc, Repressor Proteins, Signal Transduction, Transcription Factors, Cancer Genome Atlas Network, MAX, MNT, MYC genomic alterations, TCGA, The Cancer Genome Atlas, Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Biochemistry and cell biology
Abstract

Although the MYC oncogene has been implicated in cancer, a systematic assessment of alterations of MYC, related transcription factors, and co-regulatory proteins, forming the proximal MYC network (PMN), across human cancers is lacking. Using computational approaches, we define genomic and proteomic features associated with MYC and the PMN across the 33 cancers of The Cancer Genome Atlas. Pan-cancer, 28% of all samples had at least one of the MYC paralogs amplified. In contrast, the MYC antagonists MGA and MNT were the most frequently mutated or deleted members, proposing a role as tumor suppressors. MYC alterations were mutually exclusive with PIK3CA, PTEN, APC, or BRAF alterations, suggesting that MYC is a distinct oncogenic driver. Expression analysis revealed MYC-associated pathways in tumor subtypes, such as immune response and growth factor signaling; chromatin, translation, and DNA replication/repair were conserved pan-cancer. This analysis reveals insights into MYC biology and is a reference for biomarkers and therapeutics for cancers with alterations of MYC or the PMN.

Published
2018

32. Ancestry-Specific Predisposing Germline Variants in Cancer

Author

Oak, Ninad, Cherniack, Andrew D., Mashl, R. Jay, Carrot-Zhang, Jian, Chambwe, Nyasha, Damrauer, Jeffrey, Knijnenburg, Theo, Robertson, A. Gordon, Yau, Christina, Zhou, Wanding, Berger, Ashton, Huang, Kuan-lin, Newberg, Justin, Romanel, Alessandro, Sayaman, Rosalyn, Demichelis, Francesca, Felau, Ina, Frampton, Garret, Han, Seunghun, Hoadley, Katherine, Kemal, Anab, Laird, Peter, Lazar, Alexander, Xiuning, Le, Shen, Hui, Wong, Christopher, Zenklusen, Jean, Ziv, Elad, Aguet, Francois, Ding, Li, Demchok, John, Mensah, Michael, Tarnuzzer, Roy, Wang, Zhining, Yang, Liming, Alfoldi, Jessica, Karczewski, Konrad, Macarthur, Daniel, Benz, Christopher, Stuart, Joshua, Hirsch, Fred R., Beroukhim, Rameen, Gümüş, Zeynep H., and Plon, Sharon E.

Subjects
Male, lcsh:QH426-470, SDHB, Genetic genealogy, lcsh:Medicine, Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated Proteins, Biology, Germline, Loss of heterozygosity, Germline mutation, Risk Factors, Paraganglioma, Neoplasms, Genetics, Genetic predisposition, Carcinoma, medicine, Humans, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Allele, Molecular Biology, Germ-Line Mutation, Genetics (clinical), BRCA2 Protein, Research, lcsh:R, BRIP1, medicine.disease, Fanconi Anemia Complementation Group Proteins, Succinate Dehydrogenase, lcsh:Genetics, Von Hippel-Lindau Tumor Suppressor Protein, Molecular Medicine, Female, RNA Helicases
Abstract

Background Distinct prevalence of inherited genetic predisposition may partially explain the difference of cancer risks across ancestries. Ancestry-specific analyses of germline genomes are required to inform cancer genetic risk and prognosis of diverse populations. Methods We conducted analyses using germline and somatic sequencing data generated by The Cancer Genome Atlas. Collapsing pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants to cancer predisposition genes (CPG), we analyzed the association between CPGs and cancer types within ancestral groups. We also identified the predisposition-associated two-hit events and gene expression effects in tumors. Results Genetic ancestry analysis classified the cohort of 9899 cancer cases into individuals of primarily European (N = 8184, 82.7%), African (N = 966, 9.8%), East Asian (N = 649, 6.6%), South Asian (N = 48, 0.5%), Native/Latin American (N = 41, 0.4%), and admixed (N = 11, 0.1%) ancestries. In the African ancestry, we discovered a potentially novel association of BRCA2 in lung squamous cell carcinoma (OR = 41.4 [95% CI, 6.1–275.6]; FDR = 0.002) previously identified in Europeans, along with a known association of BRCA2 in ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma (OR = 8.5 [95% CI, 1.5–47.4]; FDR = 0.045). In the East Asian ancestry, we discovered one previously known association of BRIP1 in stomach adenocarcinoma (OR = 12.8 [95% CI, 1.8–90.8]; FDR = 0.038). Rare variant burden analysis further identified 7 suggestive associations in African ancestry individuals previously described in European ancestry, including SDHB in pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma, ATM in prostate adenocarcinoma, VHL in kidney renal clear cell carcinoma, FH in kidney renal papillary cell carcinoma, and PTEN in uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma. Most predisposing variants were found exclusively in one ancestry in the TCGA and gnomAD datasets. Loss of heterozygosity was identified for 7 out of the 15 African ancestry carriers of predisposing variants. Further, tumors from the SDHB or BRCA2 carriers showed simultaneous allelic-specific expression and low gene expression of their respective affected genes, and FH splice-site variant carriers showed mis-splicing of FH. Conclusions While several CPGs are shared across patients, many pathogenic variants are found to be ancestry-specific and trigger somatic effects. Studies using larger cohorts of diverse ancestries are required to pinpoint ancestry-specific genetic predisposition and inform genetic screening strategies.

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

33. Butler enables rapid cloud-based analysis of thousands of human genomes

Author

Yakneen, Sergei, Waszak, Sebastian M, Gertz, Michael, Korbel, Jan O, Aminou, Brice, Bartolome, Javier, Boroevich, Keith A, Boyce, Rich, Brooks, Angela N, Buchanan, Alex, Buchhalter, Ivo, Butler, Adam P, Byrne, Niall J, Cafferkey, Andy, Campbell, Peter J, Chen, Zhaohong, Cho, Sunghoon, Choi, Wan, Clapham, Peter, Davis-Dusenbery, Brandi N, De La Vega, Francisco M, Demeulemeester, Jonas, Dow, Michelle T, Dursi, Lewis Jonathan, Eils, Juergen, Eils, Roland, Ellrott, Kyle, Farcas, Claudiu, Favero, Francesco, Fayzullaev, Nodirjon, Ferretti, Vincent, Flicek, Paul, Fonseca, Nuno A, Gelpi, Josep Ll, Getz, Gad, Gibson, Bob, Grossman, Robert L, Harismendy, Olivier, Heath, Allison P, Heinold, Michael C, Hess, Julian M, Hofmann, Oliver, Hong, Jongwhi H, Hudson, Thomas J, Hutter, Barbara, Hutter, Carolyn M, Huebschmann, Daniel, Imoto, Seiya, Ivkovic, Sinisa, Jeon, Seung-Hyup, Jiao, Wei, Jung, Jongsun, Kabbe, Rolf, Kahles, Andre, Kerssemakers, Jules NA, Kim, Hyung-Lae, Kim, Hyunghwan, Kim, Jihoon, Kim, Youngwook, Kleinheinz, Kortine, Koscher, Michael, Koures, Antonios, Kovacevic, Milena, Lawerenz, Chris, Leshchiner, Ignaty, Liu, Jia, Livitz, Dimitri, Mihaiescu, George L, Mijalkovic, Sanja, Lazic, Ana Mijalkovic, Miyano, Satoru, Miyoshi, Naoki, Nahal-Bose, Hardeep K, Nakagawa, Hidewaki, Nastic, Mia, Newhouse, Steven J, Nicholson, Jonathan, O'Connor, Brian D, Ocana, David, Ohi, Kazuhiro, Ohno-Machado, Lucila, Omberg, Larsson, Ouellette, BF Francis, Paramasivam, Nagarajan, Perry, Marc D, Pihl, Todd D, Prinz, Manuel, Puiggros, Montserrat, Radovic, Petar, Raine, Keiran M, Rheinbay, Esther, Rosenberg, Mara, Royo, Romina, Raetsch, Gunnar, Saksena, Gordon, Schlesner, Matthias, Shorser, Solomon, Short, Charles, Sofia, Heidi J, Spring, Jonathan, Stein, Lincoln D, Struck, Adam J, Tiao, Grace, Tijanic, Nebojsa, Torrents, David, Van Loo, Peter, Vazquez, Miguel, Vicente, David, Wala, Jeremiah A, Wang, Zhining, Weischenfeldt, Joachim, Werner, Johannes, Williams, Ashley, Woo, Youngchoon, Wright, Adam J, Xiang, Qian, Yang, Liming, Yuen, Denis, Yung, Christina K, Zhang, Junjun, Graduate School, Laboratory Genetic Metabolic Diseases, AGEM - Endocrinology, metabolism and nutrition, and AGEM - Inborn errors of metabolism

Subjects
Computer science, Biomedical Engineering, Bioengineering, Cloud computing, computer.software_genre, Brief Communication, Genome informatics, Genoma humà, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Genome, Biologia computacional, Computational biology, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Software, Computational platforms and environments, Cancer genome, Neoplasms, Humans, Hardware and infrastructure, ddc:610, 030304 developmental biology, VARIANT DISCOVERY, 0303 health sciences, Data processing, Science & Technology, Women's cancers Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences [Radboudumc 17], Human genome, business.industry, Genome, Human, Computational Biology, Cloud Computing, Women's cancers Radboud Institute for Health Sciences [Radboudumc 17], Biotechnology & Applied Microbiology, Molecular Medicine, Anomaly detection, Data mining, business, computer, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, 030217 neurology & neurosurgery, Biotechnology
Abstract

Cloud computing offers easy and economical access to computational capacity at a scale that had previously been available to only the largest research institutions. To take advantage, large biological datasets are increasingly analyzed on various cloud computing platforms, using public, private and hybrid clouds1 with the aid of workflow systems. When employed in global projects, such systems must be flexible in their ability to operate in different environments, including academic clouds, to allow researchers to bring their computational pipelines to the data, especially in cases where the raw data themselves cannot be moved. The recently developed cloud-based scientific workflow frameworks Nextflow2, Toil3 and GenomeVIP4 focus their support largely on individual commercial cloud computing environments—mostly Amazon Web Services—and lack complete functionality for other major providers. This limits their use in studies that require multi-cloud operation due to practical and regulatory requirements5,6. Butler, in contrast, provides full support for operation on OpenStack-based commercial and academic clouds, Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure and Google Compute Platform, and can thus enable international collaborations involving the analysis of hundreds of thousands of samples where distributed cloud-based computation is pursued in different jurisdictions5,6,7., Nature Biotechnology, 38 (3), ISSN:1546-1696, ISSN:1087-0156

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

34. Before and After: A Comparison of Legacy and Harmonized TCGA Data at the Genomic Data Commons

Author

Gao, Galen F., Parker, Joel S., Reynolds, Sheila M., Silva, Tiago C., Wang, Liang-Bo, Zhou, Wanding, Akbani, Rehan, Bailey, Matthew, Balu, Saianand, Berman, Benjamin P., Brooks, Denise, Chen, Hu, Cherniack, Andrew D., Demchok, John A., Ding, Li, Felau, Ina, Gaheen, Sharon, Gerhard, Daniela S., Heiman, David I., Hernandez, Kyle M., Hoadley, Katherine A., Jayasinghe, Reyka, Kemal, Anab, Knijnenburg, Theo A., Laird, Peter W., Mensah, Michael K.A., Mungall, Andrew J., Gordon Robertson, A., Shen, Hui, Tarnuzzer, Roy, Wang, Zhining, Wyczalkowski, Matthew, Yang, Liming, Zenklusen, Jean C., Zhang, Zhenyu, Liang, Han, and Noble, Michael S.

Subjects
Genome, Health Information Exchange, Genome, Human, Gene Expression Profiling, Datasets as Topic, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Reproducibility of Results, Molecular Sequence Annotation, Genomics, Article, MicroRNAs, Controlled Before-After Studies, Neoplasms, Humans, Software
Abstract

We present a systematic analysis of the effects of synchronizing a large-scale, deeply characterized, multi-omic dataset to the current human reference genome, using updated software, pipelines, and annotations. For each of 5 molecular data platforms in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)-mRNA and miRNA expression, single nucleotide variants, DNA methylation and copy number alterations-comprehensive sample, gene, and probe-level studies were performed, towards quantifying the degree of similarity between the 'legacy' GRCh37 (hg19) TCGA data and its GRCh38 (hg38) version as 'harmonized' by the Genomic Data Commons. We offer gene lists to elucidate differences that remained after controlling for confounders, and strategies to mitigate their impact on biological interpretation. Our results demonstrate that the hg19 and hg38 TCGA datasets are very highly concordant, promote informed use of either legacy or harmonized omics data, and provide a rubric that encourages similar comparisons as new data emerge and reference data evolve.

Published
2019

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results