Search

Nucleic acids and proteins are shed into the bloodstream by tumor cells and can be exploited as biomarkers for the detection of cancer. In addition, cancer detection biomarkers can also be nontumor-derived, having their origin in other organs and cell types. Hence, liquid biopsies provide a source of direct tumor cell-derived biomolecules and indirect nontumor-derived surrogate markers that circulate in body fluids or are taken up by circulating peripheral blood cells. The capacity of platelets to take up proteins and nucleic acids and alter their megakaryocyte-derived transcripts and proteins in response to external signals makes them one of the richest liquid biopsy biosources. Platelets are the second most abundant cell type in peripheral blood and are routinely isolated through well-established and fast methods in clinical diagnostics but their value as a source of cancer biomarkers is relatively recent. Platelets do not have a nucleus but have a functional spliceosome and protein translation machinery, to process RNA transcripts. Platelets emerge as important repositories of potential cancer biomarkers, including several types of RNAs (mRNA, miRNA, circRNA, lncRNA, and mitochondrial RNA) and proteins, and several preclinical studies have highlighted their potential as a liquid biopsy source for detecting various types and stages of cancer. Here, we address the usability of platelets as a liquid biopsy for the detection of cancer. We describe several studies that support the use of platelet biomarkers in cancer diagnostics and discuss what is still lacking for their implementation into the clinic., (© 2020 The Authors. Published by FEBS Press and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Kinases are attractive anticancer targets due to their central role in the growth, survival, and therapy resistance of tumor cells. This review explores the two primary kinase classes, the eukaryotic protein kinases (ePKs) and the atypical protein kinases (aPKs), and provides a structure-centered comparison of their sequences, structures, hydrophobic spines, mutation and SNP hotspots, and inhibitor interaction patterns. Despite the limited sequence similarity between these two classes, atypical kinases commonly share the archetypical kinase fold but lack conserved eukaryotic kinase motifs and possess altered hydrophobic spines. Furthermore, atypical kinase inhibitors explore only a limited number of binding modes both inside and outside the orthosteric binding site. The distribution of genetic variations in both classes shows multiple ways they can interfere with kinase inhibitor binding. This multilayered review provides a research framework bridging the eukaryotic and atypical kinase classes., (Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

One of the hallmarks of cancer is genomic instability controlled by cell cycle checkpoints. The G1 and G2 checkpoints allow DNA damage responses, whereas the mitotic checkpoint enables correct seggregation of the sister chromosomes to prevent aneuploidy. Cancer cells often lack a functional G1 arrest and rely on G2 arrest for DNA damage responses. WEE1 kinase is an important regulator of the G2 checkpoint and is overexpressed in various cancer types. Inhibition of WEE1 is a promising strategy in cancer therapy in combination with DNA-damaging agents, especially when cancer cells harbor p53 mutations, as it causes mitotic catastrophy when DNA is not repaired during G2 arrest. Cancer cell response to WEE1 inhibition monotherapy has also been demonstrated in various types of cancer, including p53 wild-type cancers. We postulate that chromosomal instability can explain tumor response to WEE1 monotherapy. Therefore, chromosomal instability may need to be taken into account when determining the most effective strategy for the use of WEE1 inhibitors in cancer therapy., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Diagnostic platforms providing biomarkers that are highly predictive for diagnosing, monitoring, and stratifying cancer patients are key instruments in the development of personalized medicine. We demonstrate that tumor cells transfer (mutant) RNA into blood platelets in vitro and in vivo, and show that blood platelets isolated from glioma and prostate cancer patients contain the cancer-associated RNA biomarkers EGFRvIII and PCA3, respectively. In addition, gene-expression profiling revealed a distinct RNA signature in platelets from glioma patients compared with normal control subjects. Because platelets are easily accessible and isolated, they may form an attractive platform for the companion diagnostics of cancer.

WEE1 kinase is a key molecule in maintaining G₂-cell-cycle checkpoint arrest for premitotic DNA repair. Whereas normal cells repair damaged DNA during G₁-arrest, cancer cells often have a deficient G₁-arrest and largely depend on G₂-arrest. The molecular switch for the G₂-M transition is held by WEE1 and is pushed forward by CDC25. WEE1 is overexpressed in various cancer types, including glioblastoma and breast cancer. Preclinical studies with cancer cell lines and animal models showed decreased cancer cell viability, reduced tumor burden, and improved survival after WEE1 inhibition by siRNA or small molecule inhibitors, which is enhanced by combination with conventional DNA-damaging therapy, such as radiotherapy and/or cytostatics. Mitotic catastrophe results from premature entry into mitosis with unrepaired lethal DNA damage. As such, cancer cells become sensitized to conventional therapy by WEE1 inhibition, in particular those with insufficient G₁-arrest due to deficient p53 signaling, like glioblastoma cells. One WEE1 inhibitor has now reached clinical phase I studies. Dose-limiting toxicity consisted of hematologic events, nausea and/or vomiting, and fatigue. The combination of DNA-damaging cancer therapy with WEE1 inhibition seems to be a rational approach to push cancer cells in mitotic catastrophe. Its safety and efficacy are being evaluated in clinical studies.

To explore the potential of using non-human coronaviruses for cancer therapy, we first established their ability to kill human tumor cells. We found that the feline infectious peritonitis virus (FIPV) and a felinized murine hepatitis virus (fMHV), both normally incapable of infecting human cells, could rapidly and effectively kill human cancer cells artificially expressing the feline coronavirus receptor aminopeptidase N. Also 3-D multilayer tumor spheroids established from such cells were effectively eradicated. Next, we investigated whether FIPV and fMHV could be targeted to human cancer cells by constructing a bispecific single-chain antibody directed on the one hand against the feline coronavirus spike protein--responsible for receptor binding and subsequent cell entry through virus-cell membrane fusion--and on the other hand against the human epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). The targeting antibody mediated specific infection of EGFR-expressing human cancer cells by both coronaviruses. Furthermore, in the presence of the targeting antibody, infected cancer cells formed syncytia typical of productive coronavirus infection. By their potent cytotoxicity, the selective targeting of non-human coronaviruses to human cancer cells provides a rationale for further investigations into the use of these viruses as anticancer agents.

Conditionally replicative adenoviruses (CRAds) are potentially useful agents for anticancer virotherapy approaches. However, lack of coxsackievirus and adenovirus receptor (CAR) expression on many primary tumor cells limits the oncolytic potency of CRAds. This makes the concept of targeting, that is, redirecting infection via CAR-independent entry pathways, relevant for CRAd development. Bispecific adapter molecules constitute highly versatile means for adenovirus targeting. Here, we constructed a CRAd with the Delta24 E1A mutation that produces a bispecific single-chain antibody directed towards the adenovirus fiber knob and the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). This EGFR-targeted CRAd exhibited increased infection efficiency and oncolytic replication on CAR-deficient cancer cells and augmented lateral spread in CAR-deficient 3-D tumor spheroids in vitro. When compared to its parent control with native tropism, the new CRAd exhibited similar cytotoxicity on CAR-positive cancer cells, but up to 1000-fold enhanced oncolytic potency on CAR-deficient, EGFR-positive cancer cells. In addition, EGFR-targeted CRAd killed primary human CAR-deficient brain tumor specimens that were refractory to the parent control virus. We conclude, therefore, that CRAds expressing bispecific targeting adapter molecules are promising agents for cancer treatment. Their use is likely to result in enhanced oncolytic replication in cancerous tissues and thus in more effective tumor regression.