Search

The purpose of this study is to establish the recommended phase 2 dose for regorafenib in combination with sildenafil for patients with advanced solid tumors. Secondary outcomes included identification of antitumor effects of regorafenib and sildenafil, toxicity of the combination, determination of PDE5 expression in tumor samples, and the impact of sildenafil on the pharmacokinetics of regorafenib. This study was a phase 1, open-label single-arm dose-escalation trial using a 3 + 3 design. Additional patients were enrolled at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) until a total of 12 patients were treated at the MTD. A total of 29 patients were treated in this study. The median duration of treatment was 8 weeks. The recommended phase 2 doses determined in this study are regorafenib 160 mg daily with sildenafil 100 mg daily. The most common toxicities included palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (20 patients, 69%) and hypophosphatemia (18 patients, 62%). Two patients (7%) experienced grade 4 lipase increase. Objective responses were not observed; however, 14 patients (48%) had a period of stable disease during the study. Stable disease for up to 12 months was observed in patients with ovarian cancer as well as up to 20 months for a patient with cervical cancer. The combination of regorafenib and sildenafil at the recommended phase 2 dose is safe and generally well tolerated. Disease control in patients with gynecologic malignancies was especially encouraging. Further evaluation of the combination of regorafenib and sildenafil in gynecologic malignancies is warranted. Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT02466802., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Purpose: To determine if combination treatment with pemetrexed and sorafenib is safe and tolerable in patients with advanced solid tumors., Results: Thirty-seven patients were enrolled and 36 patients were treated (24 in cohort A; 12 in cohort B). The cohort A dose schedule resulted in problematic cumulative toxicity, while the cohort B dose schedule was found to be more tolerable. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was pemetrexed 750 mg/m2 every 14 days with oral sorafenib 400 mg given twice daily on days 1-5. Because dosing delays and modifications were associated with the MTD, the recommended phase II dose was declared to be pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 every 14 days with oral sorafenib 400 mg given twice daily on days 1-5. Thirty-three patients were evaluated for antitumor activity. One complete response and 4 partial responses were observed (15% overall response rate). Stable disease was seen in 15 patients (45%). Four patients had a continued response at 6 months, including 2 of 5 patients with triple-negative breast cancer., Experimental Design: A phase I trial employing a standard 3 + 3 design was conducted in patients with advanced solid tumors. Cohort A involved a novel dose escalation schema exploring doses of pemetrexed every 14 days with continuous sorafenib. Cohort B involved a modified schedule of sorafenib dosing on days 1-5 of each 14-day pemetrexed cycle. Radiographic assessments were conducted every 8 weeks., Conclusions: Pemetrexed and intermittent sorafenib therapy is a safe and tolerable combination for patients, with promising activity seen in patients with breast cancer., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Adoptive immunotherapy (AIT) of cancer with T lymphocytes may be limited by the need to activate tumor antigen-sensitized cells in vitro. In murine models, we have shown that AIT with tumor-sensitized T cells that have been pharmacologically activated with bryostatin 1 and ionomycin plus interleukin-2 can induce tumor regression. A Phase I clinical trial was carried out to assess the feasibility and toxicity associated with using tumor- or vaccine-draining lymph node cells, activated pharmacologically and expanded in culture with low-dose interleukin-2 and infused intravenously, followed by IL-2 infusion. Nine patients were entered into the trial, and six were treated as planned. Average expansion of cell numbers over 13 to 27 days in culture was 118-fold. No patient's cells reached the target cell number (2.5 x 10(10)). Infusion of these cells did not result in any unexpected toxicities. The toxicities observed were related to IL-2 infusion, and conformed to the expected range of side-effects. Based on these Phase I results, additional trials, with tumor antigen vaccine-sensitized DLN and technical modifications of the culture technique, are planned.

Purpose: To identify a recommended phase II dose for the second generation glycinamide ribonucleotide transformylase (GARFT) inhibitor, AG2034, administered by intravenous bolus every 3 weeks without folate supplementation and to describe AG2034 pharmacokinetics., Methods: Adults with advanced malignancies were enrolled in cohorts of three per dose level with expansion to six upon observation of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was defined as the dose at which two of up to six patients experienced DLT. Upon identification of an MTD and evidence of cumulative toxicity, a lower intermediate dose was explored as a candidate phase II dose. AG2034 plasma concentrations were measured using an ELISA assay., Results and Conclusions: The recommended phase II dose is 5.0 mg/m2. DLTs were anemia, thrombocytopenia, mucositis, diarrhea, hyperbilirubinemia, fatigue, and insomnia. Toxicities were modestly cumulative over three courses. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed a dose-AUC0-24 relationship and a progressive increase in AG2034 AUC0-24 over three courses. Both pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic factors may contribute to the modest cumulative toxicity observed with AG2034.

Purpose: Lometrexol [(6R)-5,10-dideaza-5,6,7,8-tetrahydrofolate] is the prototype folate antimetabolite that targets the de novo purine synthesis pathway. Early phase I trials were confounded by cumulative myelosuppression that prevented repetitive administration. Subsequent preclinical and clinical studies suggested that coadministration of folic acid might favorably modulate lometrexol toxicity without eliminating potential antitumor activity. We set out to determine if concurrent folic acid would allow administration of lometrexol on a weekly schedule, and, if so, to identify an appropriate dose combination for phase II trials. Pharmacokinetic and metabolism studies were undertaken in an attempt to improve our understanding of lometrexol pharmacodynamics., Methods: Patients with advanced cancer received daily oral folic acid beginning 7 days before lometrexol and continuing for 7 days beyond the last lometrexol dose. Lometrexol was administered by short i.v. infusion weekly for 8 weeks. Scheduled lometrexol doses were omitted for toxicity of more than grade 2 present on the day of treatment, and dose-limiting toxicity was prospectively defined in terms of frequency of dose omission as well as the occurrence of severe toxic events. Plasma and whole blood total lometrexol contents (lometrexol plus lometrexol polyglutamates) were measured in samples taken just prior to each lometrexol dose., Results: A total of 18 patients were treated at five lometrexol dose levels. The maximum tolerated dose was identified by frequent dose omission due to thrombocytopenia and mucositis. The recommended phase II dose combination is lometrexol 10.4 mg/m(2) per week i.v. with folic acid 3 mg/m(2) per day orally. One patient with melanoma experienced a partial response, and three patients, two with melanoma and one with renal cell carcinoma, experienced stable disease. Lometrexol was not detectable in any predose plasma sample tested. The total red blood cell content of lometrexol increased over several weeks and then appeared to plateau., Conclusions: Weekly administration of lometrexol is feasible and well-tolerated when coadministered with daily oral folic acid. The nature of the interaction between natural folates and lometrexol that renders this schedule feasible remains unclear. A definition of dose-limiting toxicity that incorporated attention to dose omissions allowed efficient identification of a recommended phase II dose that reflects the maximum feasible dose intensity for a weekly schedule. Lometrexol is a promising, anticancer agent.

A Phase Ib trial of bryostatin 1, a macrocyclic lactone and protein kinase C (PKC) activator, was conducted in patients with refractory nonhematological malignancies with the primary goal of determining whether down-regulation of peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMNC) PKC activity could be achieved in vivo in humans. Patients (four patients/cohort) received bryostatin 1 (25 microg/m2) as a 1-h infusion weekly three times every 4 weeks, but to study the schedule dependence of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, the first dose was administered according to one of three schedules: (a) a 1-h infusion; (b) a 24-h infusion; or (c) a split course (12.5 microg/m2 as a 30-min infusion) on days 1 and 4. Conventional toxicities (grades I-III) included myalgias, fever, anemia, fatigue, phlebitis, and headache; in addition, two patients in cohort 3 experienced transient elevations in liver function tests, although these patients had preexisting liver metastases. No objective clinical responses were encountered. Effects on PBMNC PKC activity were heterogeneous. Several patients in cohorts 1 and 2 experienced significant declines in activity (approximately 50%) that were sustained in some cases for periods of > or = 72 h. Comparison of 72-h with baseline values for all three patient cohorts combined revealed a trend toward PKC down-regulation (P = 0.06; signed rank test). For each schedule, plasma bryostatin 1 levels were below the level of detection of a platelet aggregation-based bioassay (3-4 nm). Bryostatin 1 administration failed to produce consistent alterations in lymphocyte immunophenotypic profiles, interleukin 2-induced proliferation, or cytotoxicity, although two of three samples from patients in cohort 3 did show significant posttreatment increases in proliferation. Moreover, in some patients, bryostatin 1 treatment increased lymphokine-activated killer cell activity. These findings indicate that bryostatin 1 doses of 25 microg/m2 can induce in vivo PBMNC PKC down-regulation in at least a subset of patients and raise the possibility that higher bryostatin 1 doses may be more effective in achieving this effect.

Purpose: A phase I dose-escalation trial of intravenous (IV) L-buthionine-SR-sulfoximine (BSO) with melphalan (L-PAM) was performed to determine the toxicity and biologic activity of BSO, administered as a short infusion every 12 hours, and the combination of BSO plus L-PAM., Patients and Methods: Twenty-eight patients with refractory malignancies received 30-minute infusions of BSO every 12 hours for 6 to 10 doses in week 1 followed in week 2 by either IV L-PAM (15 mg/m2) alone or BSO as in week 1 with L-PAM. Patients received the combination in week 5 (course no. 2) if they received L-PAM alone during week 2 and vice versa. BSO doses ranged from 1.5 g/m2 to 13.104 g/m2., Results: The only toxicity observed with BSO infusions was occasional nausea/vomiting. Evaluation of 23 paired courses (L-PAM plus BSO v L-PAM) showed significantly (P < .001) greater leukopenia and thrombocytopenia with L-PAM plus BSO. No other significant toxicity was noted. Measurement of intracellular glutathione (GSH) levels in peripheral mononuclear cells (PBLs) of all patients receiving BSO showed a consistent, non-dose-dependent, linear decrease in GSH with repeated BSO doses. Maximal GSH depletion (40% of baseline values, absolute values 200 to 250 ng/10(6) PBLs) was noted after the sixth BSO dose; extended BSO dosing schedules beyond six total BSO doses did not further deplete GSH. Evaluation of gamma-glutamylcysteine synthetase (GCS) activity showed marked inhibition near the end of each infusion with near complete recovery of GCS activity before the next BSO dose. The pattern of GCS inhibition mirrored the plasma BSO concentrations with peak values (level 6, 4 to 8 mmol/L L,R+L,S BSO) observed at the end of the infusion with a rapid decrease in plasma concentrations with an estimated half-life (t1/2) of less than 2 hours. Differential elimination of the R+S stereoisomers was observed. Analysis of L-PAM pharmacokinetics showed marked interpatient variability and a significant decrease in total-body clearance (P = .01) and volume of distribution (P = .03) in courses with L-PAM plus BSO as compared with L-PAM alone., Conclusion: This study shows that BSO alone and in combination with L-PAM can be safely given to patients, but that a schedule of short infusions every 12 hours does not result in GSH depletion less than 30% of baseline values.

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and gamma-interferon (gamma-IFN) are cytokines with synergistic biologic and antiproliferative effects in vitro and in mouse models. The biologic effects of the combination of TNF and gamma-IFN, however, have not been studied well in humans. A Phase I trial was conducted of TNF and gamma-IFN therapy in 24 patients with advanced malignancies to determine the tolerability of the combination and the biologic effects of TNF and gamma-IFN in vivo. Both TNF and gamma-IFN were administered as 30-minute intravenous infusions three times per week. Doses of TNF ranged from 25 to 100 micrograms/m2; all patients received 100 micrograms/m2 of gamma-IFN. Dose-limiting toxicity consisted primarily of orthostatic hypotension and constitutional symptoms. The maximum tolerated dose level (MTDL) of 50 micrograms/m2 of TNF and 100 micrograms/m2 of IFN-gamma was less than the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) observed in previous Phase I trials of gamma-IFN and TNF alone. Biologic responses were studied in seven patients treated at the MTDL. Serum interleukin-2 receptor levels and neopterin secretion were enhanced significantly 24 hours after therapy (P = 0.002); enhancement of monocyte Fc receptor levels had borderline statistical significance (P = 0.07). With the exception of the mean fluorescent intensity on monocytes positive for histocompatibility antigen HLA-DR (P = 0.03), HLA Class I and II cell surface protein expression was not increased. The combination significantly enhanced indoleamine dioxygenase activity and serum beta 2-microglobulin expression (P less than 0.04) but not 2',5'-oligoadenylate synthetase activity, bactericidal function, or chemiluminescence. These results were compared retrospectively with those observed in previous Phase I trials of gamma-IFN and TNF alone. The combination of TNF and gamma-IFN significantly increased urinary kynurenine levels more than either TNF alone or gamma-IFN alone. Given the limitations inherent in any retrospective analysis, however, the enhancement in the other biologic parameters measured at the MTDL during this trial did not differ significantly from the changes observed at the MTD of either TNF or gamma-IFN alone. It was concluded that the combination of TNF and gamma-IFN, when administered at the MTDL of the combination, does not offer any enhancement in biologic responses over either agent alone.

A phase I trial of 5-fluorouracil (FUra) and leucovorin (LV) given with and without dipyridamole (DP) by concurrent 120-h continuous infusion was performed in 27 patients with advanced solid malignancies, 8 of whom had previously received FUra. The LV and DP doses were fixed at 500 mg/m2 daily and 7.7 mg/kg daily, respectively, whereas the FUra dose was escalated. Level 3 (450 mg/m2 FUra daily) represented the maximum tolerated dose for both FUra/LV+DP and FUra/LV. Dose-limiting stomatitis (greater than or equal to grade 3 or grade 2 occurring during the infusion) was encountered in 75% of the first courses given at level 4 (600 mg/m2 daily). Stomatitis was observed in 44/78 (56%) courses. Diarrhea was infrequent and mild. DP infusions were complicated by mild to moderate headache, which was controlled with narcotic analgesics, and mild to moderate nausea/vomiting. FUra-related toxicity was not enhanced by DP administration. Limited pharmacokinetic sampling at levels 3 and 4 revealed mean steady-state FUra concentrations of around 1.0 microM with infusions of FUra/LV+DP. Among three paired courses given with and without DP, no statistically significant difference was found in the total body clearance of FUra (P = 0.44). One partial response was seen in a patient with metastatic gastric carcinoma. For phase II trials, we recommend that concurrent 120-h continuous infusions of FUra (450 mg/m2 daily) and LV (500 mg/m2 daily) be given with and without DP (7.7 mg/kg daily) every 21 days.

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) is a cytokine with pleiotropic biological and antitumor effects in vitro and in mouse models. The immunological effects of the molecule as a single agent, however, have not been well studied clinically. We conducted a Phase I trial of TNF in 53 patients with advanced malignancies in order to determine the biological and clinical effects of TNF when administered as a 30-min i.v. infusion three times/week. Dose levels of TNF ranged from 5 to 275 micrograms/m2; doses of TNF were escalated between patient groups. The most common clinical toxicities of TNF consisted of rigors, anorexia, headache, and fatigue. Dose-limiting toxicity consisted of hypotension, fatigue, and nausea. Four patients treated at the maximally tolerated dose of 225 micrograms/m2 received dexamethasone to determine whether the toxicities of TNF could be ameliorated. No significant differences in hypotension or subjective symptomatology were observed in those patients receiving dexamethasone and those who did not or between injections in which dexamethasone was administered and when it was not. One patient with colorectal carcinoma treated with 50 micrograms/m2 had a partial response lasting about 9 months. Biological responses were evaluated in 8 patients treated at the maximally tolerated dose before therapy and 24 h afterward. TNF significantly (P less than 0.05 for all) enhanced serum beta 2-microglobulin, serum neopterin, and serum interleukin-2 receptor (Tac antigen) levels. Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase activity was also increased 24 h following the administration of TNF, although this increase was only of borderline statistical significance (P = 0.07). TNF did not enhance granulocyte bactericidal activity. The expression of cell surface proteins on monocytes, including HLA-DR, HLA-DQ, beta 2-microglobulin, and the Fc receptor, and serum interleukin-1 activity also were not significantly increased by the administration of TNF. Thus, in humans TNF caused biological response modulation with evidence of HLA Class I (beta 2-microglobulin) increase and T-cell (Tac antigen) and monocyte (neopterin) activation.

A phase I trial of fazarabine (ara-AC, 1-beta-D-arabinofuranosyl-5-azacytosine, NSC 281272) administered as a 24-h continuous infusion was performed in 24 adults with solid tumor malignancies. The majority of patients had received prior marrow-suppressive therapy. Level 7 (54.5 mg/m2/h for 24 h) was the maximum tolerated dose since during 6 evaluable first courses, 2 episodes of grade 4 granulocytopenia and 3 episodes of grade 3 occurred. Moderate thrombocytopenia also occurred at level 7 with 3 episodes of grade 1 and 1 episode of grade 4 thrombocytopenia during 6 first course treatments. Minimal myelosuppression, principally leukopenia, was seen prior to level 7. The nadir WBC through 47 courses had a linear relationship with plasma steady-state concentrations of ara-AC. The only other toxicity noted was moderate nausea/vomiting, which did not appear to be dose related. Plasma steady-state concentrations of ara-AC were reached in all patients within 4-6 h and ranged from 1.1 microM (11 mg/m2/h for 24 h) to 7.5 microM (54.5 mg/m2/h for 24 h). The mean total body clearance of ara-AC for 47 courses, levels 1-7, was 592 +/- 147 (SD) ml/min/m2 which is similar to prior pharmacokinetic data from the 24-h and 72-h infusion trials of the Pediatric and Medicine Branches, respectively. There were no objective disease responses during the trial. The recommended adult phase II dose for a 24-h infusion of ara-AC is 45-50 mg/m2/h.

Forty-seven patients with advanced malignancies were treated with a concurrent 72-h continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (FUra) and dipyridamole. The FUra dose was escalated over the dose range of 185 to 3600 mg/m2/day for 3 days. Dipyridamole was administered in a fixed dose of 7.7 mg/kg/day for 3 days. A total of 155 courses of therapy were completed of which there were 31 paired courses of the combination and FUra alone, at the same dose of FUra and in the same patient. This was for purposes of analysis of pharmacokinetics and modulation of FUra toxicity by dipyridamole. Stomatitis was the dose-limiting toxicity experienced by patients entered into this trial. Myelosuppression was not a serious problem. Increasing FUra plasma concentration was associated with greater leukopenia and stomatitis. Dipyridamole did not appear to modulate the systemic toxicity of FUra. The pharmacokinetics of FUra were altered by the concurrent administration of dipyridamole. Dipyridamole promoted the total body clearance of FUra which resulted in lower mean steady-state FUra plasma concentrations when compared with courses of FUra alone administered at the same dose level. These differences were statistically significant over the course of the trial. For courses of the combination, FUra exhibited linear pharmacokinetics over the dose range studied. Total body clearance of FUra declined slightly at the higher dose levels, but the differences were not significant. For courses of FUra alone, total body clearance was significantly decreased above the dose level of 2300 mg/m2/day. At the maximal tolerated dose of FUra, 2300 mg/m2/day x3, mean steady-state FUra plasma concentration and total body clearance were 6.6 microM and 122 liters/h/m2, respectively, for courses of the combination. The corresponding pharmacokinetic parameters were 7.4 microM and 103 liters/h/m2 for courses when FUra was given alone. Further evaluation of the utility of this regimen and basis of these pharmacokinetic observations appear warranted.