Search

Purpose: Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is a common and distressing symptom that can persist after cancer treatment has concluded. Bright light therapy has shown preliminary efficacy in reducing CRF, but its impact on other psychosocial factors is unclear. The purpose was to examine the impact of a 1-month light therapy intervention on fatigue, mood, and quality of life in cancer survivors with fatigue., Methods: This 4-week blinded randomized controlled trial recruited cancer survivors who met diagnostic criteria for CRF. Participants were randomly assigned to receive a light therapy device that produced either bright white light (BWL; intervention) or dim red light (DRL; active control). Participants were instructed to use the device daily for 30 min upon waking for 28 days. The primary outcome, fatigue, was assessed weekly. Secondary outcomes assessed pre- and post-intervention included mood, depressive symptoms, and quality of life., Results: A total of 81 participants were randomly assigned to receive BWL (n = 42) or DRL (n = 39). Analyses revealed a group-by-time interaction for fatigue (p = .034), wherein the BWL condition reported a 17% greater reduction in fatigue than those in the DRL condition (between group d = .30). There were also significant improvements over time for both groups on measures of mood, depressive symptoms, and quality of life (p's < .01)., Conclusions: BWL was associated with greater improvements in fatigue and both groups displayed improvements on secondary psychosocial outcomes., Implications for Cancer Survivors: These findings, along with previous reports of light therapy for CRF, support the use of this intervention to improve fatigue in cancer survivors.

This preliminary study investigated whether bupropion sustained release (SR) improved symptomatic fatigue, depression and quality of life in cancer patients and caregiver quality of life. The sample consisted of a prospective open case series of 21 cancer patients, with fatigue and with or without depression at moderate to severe levels, referred for psychiatric assessment from a tertiary care cancer centre. Both patient symptom ratings and caregiver ratings were measured before and after 4 weeks of treatment with the maximally tolerated dose of bupropion in the range of 100-300 mg per day. At trial completion, significant improvement was found for symptoms of fatigue and depression. Subjects were divided into two groups: depressed and non-depressed (based on a cut-off score of 17 on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale). Both groups reported improvement for fatigue and depressive symptoms. Depressed subjects and their caregivers did not experience any change in quality of life, while the non-depressed subjects and their caregivers reported improvements. Results from this small group of patients suggest that bupropion may have potential as an effective pharmaceutical agent for treating cancer-related fatigue. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial with this medication is indicated.

Objective: To demonstrate that bupropion sustained release (SR) can reduce the symptoms of fatigue experienced by cancer patients., Method: We studied an open-label case series of outpatients with fatigue referred for psychiatric assessment from a tertiary care cancer centre. Inclusion criteria were the presence of fatigue or depression with marked fatigue. Clinical status was assessed using the Global Clinical Improvement scale., Results: Fifteen subjects with various cancer sites and psychiatric diagnoses were treated with bupropion SR (modal dose 150 mg) for up to 2 years. Most (13 of 15) saw improvement. Thirteen patients had minor, expectable side effects, and 10 patients were able to continue with bupropion for an extended time. All subjects who improved showed improvement within 2 to 4 weeks., Conclusions: This is the first report that shows bupropion SR can reduce fatigue in cancer patients. Controlled studies with more homogeneous samples would be necessary to establish the efficacy of this intervention. Further studies should address whether this effect of bupropion is separate from its action as an antidepressant.

Focus groups of past program participants were conducted to explore the impact of a novel residential psychosocial intervention for cancer patients. All participants had attended the program between 6 months and 1 year prior to the study. The intention was to elicit a broad range of feedback regarding the program's effects on people living with cancer. Of particular interest was the assessment of lasting outcomes for participants, and possibilities for program improvement. This article reports the substantive understanding resulting from these focus groups, and discusses the beneficial impact, effective program characteristics, and controversial issues of residential psychosocial programming.

Purpose: In an effort to mitigate the negative psychological sequelae of a cancer diagnosis and cancer treatment, efforts have been made to explore a variety of psychosocial issues and interventions. This article describes the provision and preliminary evaluation of a novel psychosocial service delivery, a residential "retreat" program called Tapestry, which is run under the aegis of the established cancer care community in Alberta, Canada., Overview: Retreat programs offer a novel way to provide psychosocial support for those persons who are living with cancer. The retreats are unique in the provision of a respite and the opportunity to address the isolation and other existential issues arising from a cancer diagnosis. The program described in this article has provided such a service six times per year since 1998. The intervention is described, and preliminary evaluation data are presented., Clinical Implications: Cancer care has begun to move beyond a solely biomedical paradigm toward a more holistic ethos in service delivery and research orientation. While the face value of and demand for such programming continues to grow, few residential psychosocial programs are offered under the auspices of conventional cancer care centers, and little work has been done to examine the nature and possible efficacy of retreat programs as a valid forum for psychosocial service delivery.