Search

Purpose: 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide (4HCY) is the principal precursor to the cytotoxic metabolite of cyclophosphamide (CY), which is often used as first-line treatment of children with cancer. There is conflicting data regarding the relationship between CY efficacy, toxicity, and pharmacokinetics with the genes encoding proteins involved in 4HCY pharmacokinetics, specifically its formation and elimination., Methods: We evaluated germline pharmacogenetics in children with various malignancies receiving their first CY dose. Using linear regression, we analyzed the associations between two pharmacokinetic outcomes - how fast a child cleared CY (i.e., CY clearance) and the ratio of the 4HCY/CY exposure, specifically area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC), and 372 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in 14 drug-metabolizing transporters or enzymes involved in 4HCY formation or elimination., Results: Age was associated with the ratio of 4HCY/CY AUC (P = 0.004); Chemotherapy regimen was associated with CY clearance (P = 0.003). No SNPs were associated with CY clearance or the ratio of 4HCY/CY AUC after controlling for a false discovery rate., Conclusion: Age and chemotherapy regimen, but not germline pharmacogenomics, were associated with CY clearance or the ratio of 4HCY/CY AUC. Other methods, such as metabolomics or lipidomics, should be explored., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

To evaluate the clinical impact of molecular tumor profiling (MTP) with targeted sequencing panel tests, pediatric patients with extracranial solid tumors were enrolled in a prospective observational cohort study at 12 institutions. In the 345-patient analytical population, median age at diagnosis was 12 years (range 0-27.5); 298 patients (86%) had 1 or more alterations with potential for impact on care. Genomic alterations with diagnostic, prognostic or therapeutic significance were present in 61, 16 and 65% of patients, respectively. After return of the results, impact on care included 17 patients with a clarified diagnostic classification and 240 patients with an MTP result that could be used to select molecularly targeted therapy matched to identified alterations (MTT). Of the 29 patients who received MTT, 24% had an objective response or experienced durable clinical benefit; all but 1 of these patients received targeted therapy matched to a gene fusion. Of the diagnostic variants identified in 209 patients, 77% were gene fusions. MTP with targeted panel tests that includes fusion detection has a substantial clinical impact for young patients with solid tumors., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.)

Purpose: Molecular tumor profiling is becoming a routine part of clinical cancer care, typically involving tumor-only panel testing without matched germline. We hypothesized that integrated germline sequencing could improve clinical interpretation and enhance the identification of germline variants with significant hereditary risks., Materials and Methods: Tumors from pediatric patients with high-risk, extracranial solid malignancies were sequenced with a targeted panel of cancer-associated genes. Later, germline DNA was analyzed for a subset of these genes. We performed a post hoc analysis to identify how an integrated analysis of tumor and germline data would improve clinical interpretation., Results: One hundred sixty participants with both tumor-only and germline sequencing reports were eligible for this analysis. Germline sequencing identified 38 pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants among 35 (22%) patients. Twenty-five (66%) of these were included in the tumor sequencing report. The remaining germline pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants were single-nucleotide variants filtered out of tumor-only analysis because of population frequency or copy-number variation masked by additional copy-number changes in the tumor. In tumor-only sequencing, 308 of 434 (71%) single-nucleotide variants reported were present in the germline, including 31% with suggested clinical utility. Finally, we provide further evidence that the variant allele fraction from tumor-only sequencing is insufficient to differentiate somatic from germline events., Conclusion: A paired approach to analyzing tumor and germline sequencing data would be expected to improve the efficiency and accuracy of distinguishing somatic mutations and germline variants, thereby facilitating the process of variant curation and therapeutic interpretation for somatic reports, as well as the identification of variants associated with germline cancer predisposition., Competing Interests: Alanna J. Church Honoraria: The Jackson Laboratory Consulting or Advisory Role: AlphaSights, The Jackson Laboratory, Bayer Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Bayer Laura B. Corson Employment: Sema4 Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Alnylam, Inovio Pharmaceuticals, Agios Consulting or Advisory Role: Biomatics Patents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Patent from work done at H3 Biomedicine before 2016 Brennan Decker Employment: Foundation Medicine Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Avidea Technologies, Roche Consulting or Advisory Role: Foundation Medicine, Avidea Technologies Catherine M. Clinton Employment: Helix OpCo LLC Mark A. Applebaum Consulting or Advisory Role: Fennec Pharma Rochelle Bagatell Uncompensated Relationships: Ymabs Therapeutics Inc Steven G. DuBois Consulting or Advisory Role: Bayer, Amgen Research Funding: Merck (Inst), Roche/Genentech (Inst), Lilly (Inst), Curis (Inst), Loxo (Inst), BMS (Inst), Eisai (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Turning Point Therapeutics (Inst), Bayer (Inst), Salarius Pharmaceuticals (Inst) Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche/Genentech, Salarius Pharmaceuticals Uncompensated Relationships: Ymabs Therapeutics Inc Julia L. Glade-Bender Research Funding: Eisai (Inst), Lilly (Inst), Loxo (Inst), Roche/Genentech (Inst), Bayer (Inst) Patents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Patent on a T lympboblastic lymphoma cell line, CUTLL1 Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Amgen (Inst) Uncompensated Relationships: SpringWorks Therapeutics, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Eisai Open Payments Link: https://openpaymentsdata.cms.gov/physician/708514 AeRang Kim Research Funding: Esai (Inst); AstraZeneca (Inst); Oncternal (Inst); Ascentage (Inst); BioAlta (Inst). Theodore W. Laetsch Consulting or Advisory Role: Novartis, Bayer, Cellectis, Aptitude Health, Clinical Education Alliance, Deciphera, Jumo Health, Massive Bio, Med Learning Group, Medscape, Physicans' Education Resource, Y-mAbs Therapeutics Research Funding: Pfizer (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Bayer (Inst), AbbVie (Inst), Amgen (Inst), Atara Biotherapeutics (Inst), Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), Lilly (Inst), Epizyme (Inst), GlaxoSmithKline (Inst), Janssen (Inst), Jubilant Pharmaceuticals (Inst), Novella Clinical (Inst), Servier (Inst), Foundation Medicine (Inst), Merck Sharp & Dohme (Inst) Margaret E. Macy Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Johnson & Johnson, GE Healthcare, Varian Medical Systems Consulting or Advisory Role: Ymabs Therapeutics Inc Research Funding: Bayer (Inst), Ignyta (Inst), Roche (Inst), Lilly (Inst), Merck (Inst), Oncternal Therapeutics Inc (Inst), AbbVie (Inst), Jubilant DraxImage (Inst), Actuate Therapeutics (Inst) Patents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Patent for non-invasive methods of leukemia cell detection with MRI/MRS—Patent No. 8894975 Luke Maese Honoraria: Jazz Pharmaceuticals Consulting or Advisory Role: Jazz Pharmaceuticals Amit J. Sabnis Consulting or Advisory Role: Cardinal Health Joshua D. Schiffman Employment: PEEL Therapeutics Leadership: PEEL Therapeutics Stock and Other Ownership Interests: ItRunsInMyFamily.com, PEEL Therapeutics Honoraria: Affymetrix Consulting or Advisory Role: N-of-One, Fabric Genomics Samuel L. Volchenboum Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Litmus Health Consulting or Advisory Role: Accordant Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Sanford Health Daniel A. Weiser Consulting or Advisory Role: Illumina Radiopharmaceuticals Jonathan A. Nowak Research Funding: NanoString Technologies, Illumina Katherine A. Janeway Honoraria: Foundation Medicine, Takeda Consulting or Advisory Role: Bayer, Ipsen Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Bayer Brian D. Crompton Employment: Acceleron Pharma (I) Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Acceleron Pharma (I) Research Funding: Gradalis Junne Kamihara Stock and Other Ownership Interests: PanTher Therapeutics (I), ROME Therapeutics (I), TellBio (I) Honoraria: Pfizer (I), NanoString Technologies (I), Foundation Medicine (I), Ikena Oncology (I) Consulting or Advisory Role: ROME Therapeutics (I), Third Rock Ventures (I), Tekla Capital Management (I) Research Funding: PureTech (I), Ribon Therapeutics (I), ACD Biotechne (I) Patents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Patent on drug delivery device licensed to PanTher Therapeutics (I), Patents on Repeat RNA biomarkers and therapeutics licensed to Rome Therapeutics (I), Patents on Circulating Tumor Cell Biomarkers Licensed to TellBio Inc (I) No other potential conflicts of interest were reported. Alanna J. Church Honoraria: The Jackson Laboratory Consulting or Advisory Role: AlphaSights, The Jackson Laboratory, Bayer Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Bayer Laura B. Corson Employment: Sema4 Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Alnylam, Inovio Pharmaceuticals, Agios Consulting or Advisory Role: Biomatics Patents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Patent from work done at H3 Biomedicine before 2016 Brennan Decker Employment: Foundation Medicine Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Avidea Technologies, Roche Consulting or Advisory Role: Foundation Medicine, Avidea Technologies Catherine M. Clinton Employment: Helix OpCo LLC Mark A. Applebaum Consulting or Advisory Role: Fennec Pharma Rochelle Bagatell Uncompensated Relationships: Ymabs Therapeutics Inc Steven G. DuBois Consulting or Advisory Role: Bayer, Amgen Research Funding: Merck (Inst), Roche/Genentech (Inst), Lilly (Inst), Curis (Inst), Loxo (Inst), BMS (Inst), Eisai (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Turning Point Therapeutics (Inst), Bayer (Inst), Salarius Pharmaceuticals (Inst) Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche/Genentech, Salarius Pharmaceuticals Uncompensated Relationships: Ymabs Therapeutics Inc Julia L. Glade-Bender Research Funding: Eisai (Inst), Lilly (Inst), Loxo (Inst), Roche/Genentech (Inst), Bayer (Inst) Patents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Patent on a T lympboblastic lymphoma cell line, CUTLL1 Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Amgen (Inst) Uncompensated Relationships: SpringWorks Therapeutics, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Eisai Open Payments Link: https://openpaymentsdata.cms.gov/physician/708514 AeRang Kim Research Funding: Esai (Inst); AstraZeneca (Inst); Oncternal (Inst); Ascentage (Inst); BioAlta (Inst). Theodore W. Laetsch Consulting or Advisory Role: Novartis, Bayer, Cellectis, Aptitude Health, Clinical Education Alliance, Deciphera, Jumo Health, Massive Bio, Med Learning Group, Medscape, Physicans' Education Resource, Y-mAbs Therapeutics Research Funding: Pfizer (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Bayer (Inst), AbbVie (Inst), Amgen (Inst), Atara Biotherapeutics (Inst), Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), Lilly (Inst), Epizyme (Inst), GlaxoSmithKline (Inst), Janssen (Inst), Jubilant Pharmaceuticals (Inst), Novella Clinical (Inst), Servier (Inst), Foundation Medicine (Inst), Merck Sharp & Dohme (Inst) Margaret E. Macy Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Johnson & Johnson, GE Healthcare, Varian Medical Systems Consulting or Advisory Role: Ymabs Therapeutics Inc Research Funding: Bayer (Inst), Ignyta (Inst), Roche (Inst), Lilly (Inst), Merck (Inst), Oncternal Therapeutics Inc (Inst), AbbVie (Inst), Jubilant DraxImage (Inst), Actuate Therapeutics (Inst) Patents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Patent for non-invasive methods of leukemia cell detection with MRI/MRS—Patent No. 8894975 Luke Maese Honoraria: Jazz Pharmaceuticals Consulting or Advisory Role: Jazz Pharmaceuticals Amit J. Sabnis Consulting or Advisory Role: Cardinal Health Joshua D. Schiffman Employment: PEEL Therapeutics Leadership: PEEL Therapeutics Stock and Other Ownership Interests: ItRunsInMyFamily.com, PEEL Therapeutics Honoraria: Affymetrix Consulting or Advisory Role: N-of-One, Fabric Genomics Samuel L. Volchenboum Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Litmus Health Consulting or Advisory Role: Accordant Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Sanford Health Daniel A. Weiser Consulting or Advisory Role: Illumina Radiopharmaceuticals Jonathan A. Nowak Research Funding: NanoString Technologies, Illumina Katherine A. Janeway Honoraria: Foundation Medicine, Takeda Consulting or Advisory Role: Bayer, Ipsen Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Bayer Brian D. Crompton Employment: Acceleron Pharma (I) Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Acceleron Pharma (I) Research Funding: Gradalis Junne Kamihara Stock and Other Ownership Interests: PanTher Therapeutics (I), ROME Therapeutics (I), TellBio (I) Honoraria: Pfizer (I), NanoString Technologies (I), Foundation Medicine (I), Ikena Oncology (I) Consulting or Advisory Role: ROME Therapeutics (I), Third Rock Ventures (I), Tekla Capital Management (I) Research Funding: PureTech (I), Ribon Therapeutics (I), ACD Biotechne (I) Patents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Patent on drug delivery device licensed to PanTher Therapeutics (I), Patents on Repeat RNA biomarkers and therapeutics licensed to Rome Therapeutics (I), Patents on Circulating Tumor Cell Biomarkers Licensed to TellBio Inc (I) No other potential conflicts of interest were reported., (© 2021 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.)

Background: Pembrolizumab is approved for the treatment of advanced cancer in adults; however, no information is available on safety and efficacy in paediatric patients. We aimed to establish the recommended phase 2 dose of pembrolizumab and its safety and antitumour activity in advanced paediatric cancer., Methods: KEYNOTE-051 is an ongoing phase 1-2 open-label trial. In this interim analysis, children aged 6 months to 17 years were recruited at 30 hospitals located in Australia, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, South Korea, Sweden, the UK, and the USA. Patients with melanoma or a centrally confirmed, PD-L1-positive, relapsed or refractory solid tumour or lymphoma, and a Lansky Play/Karnofsky Performance status score of 50 or higher, received intravenous pembrolizumab at an initial dose of 2 mg/kg every 3 weeks. Pharmacokinetics and dose-limiting toxicities were used to establish the recommended phase 2 dose, and the safety and antitumour activity of this dose were assessed. Primary endpoints were determination of dose-limiting toxicities at the maximum administered dose, safety and tolerability, and the proportion of patients with objective response to pembrolizumab for each tumour type according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1 or the International Neuroblastoma Response Criteria. Safety and efficacy were assessed in all treated patients who received at least one dose of pembrolizumab. Separate reporting of the cohort of patients with relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma was a post-hoc decision. The data cutoff for this interim analysis was Sept 3, 2018. This trial is still enrolling patients and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02332668., Findings: Of 863 patients screened between March 23, 2015, and Sept 3, 2018, 796 had tumours that were evaluable for PD-L1 expression (278 [35%] were PD-L1-positive); 155 eligible patients were enrolled and 154 had at least one dose of pembrolizumab. The median age of the enrolled patients was 13 years (IQR 8-15). Median follow-up was 8·6 months (IQR 2·5-16·4). No dose-limiting toxicities were reported in phase 1, and pembrolizumab plasma concentrations were consistent with those previously reported in adults; the recommended phase 2 dose was therefore established as 2 mg/kg every 3 weeks. Of the 154 patients treated, 69 (45%) experienced grade 3-5 adverse events, most commonly anaemia in 14 (9%) patients and decreased lymphocyte count in nine (6%) patients. 13 (8%) of the 154 patients had grade 3-5 treatment-related adverse events, most commonly decreased lymphocyte count in three (2%) patients and anaemia in two (1%) patients. 14 (9%) patients had serious treatment-related adverse events, most commonly pyrexia (four [3%]), and hypertension and pleural effusion (two [1%] each). Four patients (3%) discontinued treatment because of treatment-related adverse events, and two (1%) died (one due to pulmonary oedema and one due to pleural effusion and pneumonitis). Of 15 patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma, two had complete and seven had partial responses; thus, nine patients achieved an objective response (60·0%; 95% CI 32·3-83·7). Of 136 patients with solid tumours and other lymphomas, eight had partial responses (two patients each with adrenocortical carcinoma and mesothelioma, and one patient each with malignant ganglioglioma, epithelioid sarcoma, lymphoepithelial carcinoma, and malignant rhabdoid tumour); the proportion of patients with an objective response was 5·9% (95% CI 2·6-11·3)., Interpretation: Pembrolizumab was well tolerated and showed encouraging antitumour activity in paediatric patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma, consistent with experience in adult patients. Pembrolizumab had low antitumour activity in the majority of paediatric tumour types, and responses were observed in only a few rare PD-L1-positive tumour types, suggesting that PD-L1 expression alone is not sufficient as a biomarker for the selection of paediatric patients who are likely to respond to PD-1 checkpoint inhibitors. Final results of KEYNOTE-051, expected by September, 2022, with the possibility for extension, will report further on the activity of pembrolizumab in Hodgkin lymphoma, microsatellite instability-high tumours, and melanoma., Funding: Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Sirolimus is a mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor. Metformin may potentiate mTOR inhibition by sirolimus while mitigating its adverse effects. We conducted a pilot study to test this hypothesis., Methods: Patients with advanced solid tumor were treated with sirolimus for 7 days followed by randomization to either sirolimus with metformin (Arm A) or sirolimus (Arm B) until day 21. From day 22 onwards, all patients received sirolimus and metformin. The primary aim was to compare the change in phospho-p70S6K (pp70S6K) in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from day 8 to day 22 using a two-sample t test. Secondary aims were objective response rate, toxicity, and other serum pharmacodynamic biomarkers (e.g., fasting glucose, triglycerides, insulin, C-peptide, IGF-1, IGF-1R, IGF-BP, and leptin)., Results: 24 patients were enrolled, with 18 evaluable for the primary endpoint. There was no significant difference in mean change in pp70S6K in arm A vs. arm B (- 0.12 vs. - 0.16; P = 0.64). Similarly, there were no significant differences in other serum pharmacodynamic biomarkers. There were no partial responses. There were no dose-limiting or unexpected toxicities., Conclusions: Adding metformin to sirolimus, although well tolerated, was not associated with significant changes in pp70S6K in PBMC or other serum pharmacodynamic biomarkers., Impact: Combining metformin with sirolimus did not improve mTOR inhibition.

Background: Significant antitumor effects have been observed in a variety of malignancies via blockade of immune checkpoints. Interaction of programmed death 1 (PD-1) with its ligands PD-L1 and PD-L2 suppresses T-cell function and restricts immune-mediated tumor killing. We examined expression of these proteins in children with solid tumors, as expression may serve as biomarkers of response to this class of drugs., Methods: Sections cut from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue blocks were processed and evaluated for PD-1, PD-L1, and PD-L2 by immunohistochemistry (IHC) as well as by mRNA expression. A semiquantitative 0-5 IHC scoring system (0 = negative to 5 = very high) was applied, with scores incorporating combined prevalence of tumor cell and nontumor cell labeling. Expression profiling was performed using the NanoString nCounter™ system. Data analysis was performed using quantile normalization. All quantile-normalized data underwent subsequent log10 transformation., Results: One hundred twenty-four FFPE blocks were included in the analysis. PD-1, PD-L1, and PD-L2 IHC were not evaluable in 8, 0, and 12 blocks, respectively. PD-1, PDL-1, and PDL-2 expression was negative to moderate by both IHC (range 0-3) and mRNA expression (range 0-2.62). Correlation between IHC score and mRNA expression was poor for all three tested proteins (PD-1, r 2 = 0.06; PDL-1, r 2 = 0.007; and PDL-2, r 2 = 0.15)., Conclusions: Expression of PD-1, PD-L1, and PD-L2 is low in pediatric solid tumors. At low levels of expression, IHC score and mRNA expression correlate poorly. Current and planned clinical trials will determine whether this low level of expression predicts limited response to immune checkpoint inhibitors., (© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

The amazing successes in cure rates for children with cancer over the last century have come in large part from identifying clinical, genetic, and molecular variables associated with response to therapy in large cooperative clinical trials and stratifying therapies according to the predicted risk of relapse. There is an expanding interest in identifying germline genomic variants, as opposed to genetic variants within the tumor, that are associated with susceptibility to toxicity and for risk of relapse. This review highlights the most important germline pharmacogenetic and pharmacogenomic studies in pediatric oncology. Incorporating germline genomics into risk-adapted therapies will likely lead to safer and more effective treatments for children with cancer., (©2012 AACR.)