Search

Embryonic stem cell (ESC)-derived epitopes can act as therapeutic tumor vaccines against different types of tumors Jin (Adv Healthc Mater 2023). However, these epitopes have poor immunogenicity and stimulate insufficient CD8 + T cell responses, which motivated us to develop a new method to deliver and enhance their effectiveness. Bacterial outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) can serve as immunoadjuvants and act as a delivery vector for tumor antigens. In the current study, we engineered a new OMV platform for the co-delivery of ESC-derived tumor antigens and immune checkpoint inhibitors (PD-L1 antibody). An engineered Staphylococcal Protein A (SpA) was created to non-specifically bind to anti-PD-L1 antibody. SpyCatcher (SpC) and SpA were fused into the cell outer membrane protein OmpA to capture SpyTag-attached peptides and PD-L1 antibody, respectively. The modified OMV was able to efficiently conjugate with ESC-derived TAAs and PD-L1 antibody (SpC-OMVs + SpT-peptides + anti-PD-L1), increasing the residence time of TAAs in the body. The results showed that the combination therapy of ESC-based TAAs and PD-L1 antibody delivered by OMV had significant inhibitory effects in mouse tumor model. Specifically, it was effective in reducing tumor growth by enhancing IFN-γ-CD8 + T cell responses and increasing the number of CD8 + memory cells and antigen-specific T cells. Overall, the new OMV delivery system is a versatile platform that can enhance the immune responses of ESC-based TAA cancer vaccines., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

The pace of genomic and immunological breakthroughs in oncology is accelerating, making it likely that large randomized trials will increasingly become outdated before their completion. Traditional clinical research/practice paradigms must adapt to the reality unveiled by genomics, especially the need for customized drug combinations, rather than one-size-fits-all monotherapy. The raison-d'être of precision oncology is to offer 'the right drug for the right patient at the right time', a process enabled by transformative tissue and blood-based genomic technologies. Genomically targeted therapies are most suitable in early disease, when molecular heterogeneity is less pronounced, while immunotherapy is most effective against tumors with unstable genomes. Next-generation cancer research/practice models will need to overcome the tyranny of tradition and emphasize an innovative, precise and personalized patient-centric approach., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Information on processes for trials assessing investigational therapeutics is sparse. We assessed the trial development processes within the Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (ICT) at MD Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX) and analyzed their effects on the trial activation timeline and enrolment. Experimental Design: Data were from a prospectively maintained registry that tracks all clinical studies at MD Anderson. From this database, we identified 2,261 activated phase I-III trials; 221 were done at the ICT. ICT trials were matched to trials from other MD Anderson departments by phase, sponsorship, and submission year. Trial performance metrics were compared with paired Wilcoxon signed rank tests. Results: We identified three facets of the ICT research infrastructure: parallel processing of trial approval steps; a physician-led research team; and regular weekly meetings to foster research accountability. Separate analyses were conducted stratified by sponsorship [industry (133 ICT and 133 non-ICT trials) or institutional (68 ICT and 68 non-ICT trials)]. ICT trial development was faster from IRB approval to activation (median difference of 1.1 months for industry-sponsored trials vs. 2.3 months for institutional) and from activation to first enrolment (median difference of 0.3 months for industry vs. 1.2 months for institutional; all matched P < 0.05). ICT trials also accrued more patients (median difference of 8 participants for industry vs. 33.5 for institutional) quicker (median difference 4.8 participants/year for industry vs. 11.1 for institutional; all matched P < 0.05). Conclusions: Use of a clinical research-focused infrastructure within a large academic cancer center was associated with efficient trial development and participant accrual. Clin Cancer Res; 23(6); 1407-13. ©2016 AACR ., (©2016 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Rare cancers account for 27% of neoplasms diagnosed each year, and 25% of cancer-related deaths in the United States. However, rare cancers show some of the highest response rates to targeted therapies, probably due to identification of oncogenic drivers with little interpatient variability. Although the low incidence of rare cancers makes large-scale randomized trials involving single histologies difficult to perform, drugs have been successfully developed in rare cancers using clinical trial designs that combine microscopic histologies. Such trials are being pursued within the National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN), which possesses unique qualifications to perform widespread molecular screening of tumors for patient enrollment onto therapeutic clinical trials. When larger clinical trials are needed to determine optimum treatment strategies in rare cancers, the NCTN's broad reach in North America and internationally, and their ability to partner with both United States-based and international research organizations, can make these challenging studies feasible., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)