Search

Tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitors have been approved for metastatic solid tumors harboring NTRK fusions, but the detection of NTRK fusions is challenging. International guidelines recommend pan-TRK immunohistochemistry (IHC) screening followed by next generation sequencing (NGS) in tumor types with low prevalence of NTRK fusions, including metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). RNA-based NGS is preferred, but is expensive, time-consuming, and extracting good-quality RNA from FFPE tissue is challenging. Alternatives in daily clinical practice are warranted. We assessed the diagnostic performance of RNA-NGS, FFPE-targeted locus capture (FFPE-TLC), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and the 5'/3' imbalance quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) after IHC screening in 268 patients with microsatellite-instability-high mCRC, the subgroup in which NTRK fusions are most prevalent (1-5%). A consensus result was determined after review of all assay results. In 16 IHC positive tumors, 10 NTRK fusions were detected. In 33 IHC negative samples, no additional transcribed NTRK fusions were found, underscoring the high sensitivity of IHC. Sensitivity of RNA-NGS, FFPE-TLC, FISH, and qRT-PCR was 90%, 90%, 78%, and 100%, respectively. Specificity was 100% for all assays. Robustness, defined as the percentage of samples that provided an interpretable result in the first run, was 100% for FFPE-TLC, yet more limited for RNA-NGS (85%), FISH (70%), and qRT-PCR (70%). Overall, we do not recommend FISH for the detection of NTRK fusions in mCRC due to its low sensitivity and limited robustness. We conclude that RNA-NGS, FFPE-TLC, and qRT-PCR are appropriate assays for NTRK fusion detection, after enrichment with pan-TRK IHC, in routine clinical practice., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Targetable NTRK gene fusions can be detected across tumor types using methodologies such as pan-TRK IHC, DNA or RNA NGS testing, or FISH. Challenges for implementation of clinical testing for NTRK fusions may arise due to the range in NTRK fusion prevalence across tumors, endogenous levels of TRK expression in tissues, and the large number of potential fusion partners. In this study, we examined our experience evaluating driver mutation negative lung, urothelial or cholangiocarcinoma cases, in addition to cases with positive, equivocal, or weak staining by pan-TRK IHC for NTRK fusions. 63/127 (49.6%) of these cases were positive for pan-TRK IHC, of which 71.4% showed weak or focal staining, potentially due to physiologic or non-specific TRK expression. Of these 127 cases, 4 harbored a NTRK fusion (1 fusion was seen in two separate samples from the same patient) as confirmed by RNA fusion panel testing. Pan-TRK IHC was positive in 1 case with TPM3-NTRK1 fusion, equivocal in 1 case with GOLGA4-NTRK3 fusion, and negative in 2 samples with ADAM19-NTRK3 fusion. Our findings show that we were able to successfully identify NTRK fusions that resulted in targeted therapy. However, our results suggest limited sensitivity of pan-TRK IHC for NTRK3 fusions, and that the reduced specificity for pan-TRK IHC in tumors with physiologic or non-specific TRK expression, results in false positive samples that require confirmatory testing by RNA based NGS., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Fusions involving TRK protein tyrosine kinases are oncogenic drivers in a variety of tumors in children and adults, with a prevalence of ∼0.2% in non-small cell lung cancer. Diagnosis can be challenging due to structural features such as NTRK intron length, but next-generation sequencing (NGS), including RNA-based NGS, increases detection. The first-generation TRK inhibitors, larotrectinib and entrectinib, have demonstrated clinically meaningful antitumor activity in TRK fusion-positive cancers in a tumor-agnostic fashion and should be considered first-line therapeutic options for TRK fusion-positive lung cancers. Furthermore, the first-generation TRK inhibitors are well tolerated. Care should be taken, however, to monitor on-target adverse events, such as dizziness, weight gain, paresthesias, and withdrawal pain. On-target and off-target mechanisms mediating TRK inhibitor resistance may occur. Next-generation TRK inhibitors, such as selitrectinib, repotrectinib, and taletrectinib, are available on ongoing clinical trials and address on-target resistance. This review will focus on NTRK fusions and TRK-directed targeted therapy specifically in the context of lung cancer., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

A Belgian ring trial for pan-TRK immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining was organised to harmonise pan-TRK IHC staining protocols and interpretation. As a reference method, the VENTANA pan-TRK Assay (clone EPR17341) on the Benchmark Ultra platform was selected. Six samples were selected: 2 negative, 2 fusion positive and 2 samples with wild-type endogenous TRK expression. Each participating laboratory stained the slides using their routine pan-TRK IHC and reported their results. In addition, they were asked to return one TRK-stained slide from each case. The coordinating lab evaluated these slides, compared them with the reference method and scored them. Two clones were used during the ring trial: A7H6R (Cell Signaling) and EPR17341 (Abcam/Ventana). Seven protocols achieved a sufficient performance mark, and three labs were advised to further optimise the protocol. Interpretation of pan-TRK IHC proved to be challenging in cases with physiological TRK expression. In addition, depending on the NTRK fusion partner, the staining can vary strongly in both intensity and staining pattern. Labs using the Ventana ready-to-use system based on the EPR17341 clone and using the recommended protocol settings scored best. However, given some small optimisation, all labs scored well on the technical staining and the succeeding evaluation.

Due to the efficacy of tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitor therapy and the recent Food and Drug Administration approval of larotrectinib, it is now clinically important to accurately and efficiently identify patients with neurotrophic TRK (NTRK) fusion-driven cancer. These oncogenic fusions occur when the kinase domain of NTRK1, NTRK2 or NTRK3 fuse with any of a number of N-terminal partners. NTRK fusions are characteristic of a few rare types of cancer, such as secretory carcinoma of the breast or salivary gland and infantile fibrosarcoma, but they are also infrequently seen in some common cancers, such as melanoma, glioma and carcinomas of the thyroid, lung and colon. There are multiple methods for identifying NTRK fusions, including pan-TRK immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in situ hybridisation and sequencing methods, and the advantages and drawbacks of each are reviewed here. While testing algorithms will obviously depend on availability of various testing modalities and economic considerations for each individual laboratory, we propose triaging specimens based on histology and other molecular findings to most efficiently identify tumours harbouring these treatable oncogenic fusions., (© 2019 European Society for Medical Oncology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinases (NTRK) play an important role in the development and function of the nervous system. Fusions involving NTRK and a wide range of genes that act as fusion partners are oncogenic and activate well-known signal transduction pathways like the MAPK-ERK pathway. NTRK fusions occur in many very different tumor entities in children and youth as well as in adults. There are a few tumors like secretory breast cancer and congenital fibrosarcoma for which NTRK fusions are pathognomonic. At the same time there a large number of tumors in which NTRK fusions occur in very rare frequency (e.g., lung cancer). TRK inhibitors offer now the possibility to use NTRK fusion as antitumorigenic targets in a tumor agnostic fashion regardless of the basic histology. It is the task of modern pathology to identify such targetable fusions in a highly effective and efficient manner., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.)