Search

Therapies against cell-surface targets (CSTs) represent an emerging treatment class in solid malignancies. However, high-throughput investigations of CST expression across cancer types have been reliant on data sets of mostly primary tumors, despite therapeutic use most commonly in metastatic disease. We identified a total of 818 clinical trials of CST therapies with 78 CSTs. We assembled a data set spanning RNA-seq and microarrays in 7,927 benign samples, 16,866 primary tumor samples, and 6,124 metastatic tumor samples. We also utilized single-cell RNA-seq data from 36 benign tissues and 558 primary and metastatic tumor samples, and matched RNA versus protein expression in 29 benign tissue samples, 1,075 tumor samples, and 942 cell lines. High RNA expression accurately predicted high protein expression across CST therapies in benign tissues, tumor samples, and cell lines. We compared metastatic versus primary tumor expression, identified potential opportunities for repositioning, and matched cell lines to tumor types based on CST and global RNA expression. We evaluated single-cell heterogeneity across tumors, and identified rare normal cell subpopulations that may contribute to toxicity. Finally, we identified combinations of CST therapies for which bispecific approaches could improve tumor specificity. This study helps better define the landscape of CST expression in metastatic and primary cancers.

Radiotherapy elicits dose- and lineage-dependent effects on immune cell survival, migration, activation, and proliferation in targeted tumor microenvironments. Radiation also stimulates phenotypic changes that modulate the immune susceptibility of tumor cells. This has raised interest in using radiotherapy to promote greater response to immunotherapies. To clarify the potential of such combinations, it is critical to understand how best to administer radiation therapy to achieve activation of desired immunologic mechanisms. In considering the multifaceted process of priming and propagating anti-tumor immune response, radiation dose heterogeneity emerges as a potential means for simultaneously engaging diverse dose-dependent effects in a single tumor environment. Recent work in spatially fractionated external beam radiation therapy demonstrates the expansive immune responses achievable when a range of high to low dose radiation is delivered in a tumor. Brachytherapy and radiopharmaceutical therapies deliver inherently heterogeneous distributions of radiation that may contribute to immunogenicity. This review evaluates the interplay of radiation dose and anti-tumor immune response and explores emerging methodological approaches for investigating the effects of heterogeneous dose distribution on immune responses., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The Immuno-Oncology Translational Network (IOTN) was established in 2018 as part of the Cancer Moonshot. In 2022, President Joe Biden set new goals to reduce the cancer death rate by half within 25 years and improve the lives of people with cancer and cancer survivors. The IOTN is focused on accelerating translation of cancer immunology research, from bench to bedside, and improving immunotherapy outcomes across a wide array of cancers in the adult population. The unique structure and team science approach of the IOTN is designed to accelerate discovery and evaluation of novel immune-based therapeutic and prevention strategies. In this article, we describe IOTN progress to date, including new initiatives and the development of a robust set of resources to advance cancer immunology research. We summarize new insights by IOTN researchers, some of which are ripe for translation for several types of cancers. Looking to the future, we identify barriers to the translation of immuno-oncology concepts into clinical trials and key areas for action and improvements that are suitable for high-yield investments. Based on these experiences, we recommend novel National Institutes of Health funding mechanisms and development of new resources to address these barriers., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Radiation is commonly used as a treatment intended to cure or palliate cancer patients. Despite remarkable advances in the precision of radiotherapy delivery, even the most advanced forms inevitably expose some healthy tissues surrounding the target site to radiation. On rare occasions, this results in the development of radiation-associated secondary malignancies (RASM). RASM are typically high-grade and carry a poorer prognosis than their non-radiated counterparts. RASM are characterized by a high mutation burden, increased T cell infiltration, and a microenvironment that bears unique inflammatory signatures of prior radiation, including increased expression of various cytokines (e.g., TGF-β, TNF-α, IL4, and IL10). Interestingly, these cytokines have been shown to up-regulate the expression of PD-1 and/or PD-L1-an immune checkpoint receptor/ligand pair that is commonly targeted by immune checkpoint blocking immunotherapies. Here, we review the current understanding of the tumor-immune interactions in RASM, highlight the distinct clinical and molecular characteristics of RASM that may render them immunologically "hot," and propose a rationale for the formal testing of immune checkpoint blockade as a treatment approach for patients with RASM., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Focal radiation therapy (RT) has attracted considerable attention as a combinatorial partner for immunotherapy (IT), largely reflecting a well-defined, predictable safety profile and at least some potential for immunostimulation. However, only a few RT-IT combinations have been tested successfully in patients with cancer, highlighting the urgent need for an improved understanding of the interaction between RT and IT in both preclinical and clinical scenarios. Every year since 2016, ImmunoRad gathers experts working at the interface between RT and IT to provide a forum for education and discussion, with the ultimate goal of fostering progress in the field at both preclinical and clinical levels. Here, we summarize the key concepts and findings presented at the Sixth Annual ImmunoRad conference., Competing Interests: MHBH is or has have been a recipient of research grants paid to UCSF or in-kind resources from Roche-Genentech, Varian Medical Systems, Eli Lilly, Pathway Innovations and has received fees for consulting from EMD-Serono, Varian Medical Systems, Genentech, Pathway Innovation, Scholar Rock. KHhas Honoraria: Arch Oncology (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), BMS (Inst), Boehringer Ingelheim (Inst), Codiak Biosciences (Inst), F-Star Therapeutics (Inst), Inzen Therapeutics (Inst), Merck Serono (Inst), MSD (Inst), Oncolys Biopharma (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Replimune (Inst), VacV Biotherapeutics (Inst); Consulting or Advisory Role: Arch Oncology (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), BMS (Inst), Boehringer Ingelheim (Inst), Inzen Therapeutics (Inst), Merck Serono (Inst), MSD (Inst), Oncolys BioPharma (Inst), Replimune (Inst); Speakers’ Bureau: BMS (Inst), Merck Serono (Inst), MSD (Inst); Research Funding: AstraZeneca (Inst), Boehringer Ingelheim (Inst), Merck Sharp & Dohme (Inst), Replimune (Inst). FGH received Grant or Research Support Companies from Accuray inc, Bioprotect, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche-ImFlame/ImCore, Nanobiotix, AstraZeneca, Debio Pharmaceuticals, Seagen, Eisai, MSD; Grant or Research Support Foundations from Prostate Cancer Foundation, San Salvatore Foundation; Investigator or Co-Investigator Clinical Trials in Bristol-Myers Squibb; Consultations: Johnson & Johnson; Academic Collaborations: EORTC chairman Gynecology Cancer Group, ESMO Scientific Committee member for drug development, ASTRO Scientific Committee Annual Meeting. TH has Consulting: Synthetic Biologics, Novocure, Boston Scientific, Inivata, Merck, GSK; Scientific Advisory Board: PanTher Therapeutics (Equity), Lustgarten; Research Funding (Clinical Trials): Taiho, AstraZeneca, BMS, GSK, IntraOp, Ipsen. EJ reports other support from Abmeta and Adventris, personal fees from Achilles, Dragonfly, Mestag, The Medical Home Group, and Surgtx, other support from Parker Institute, grants and other support from the Lustgarten Foundation, Genentech, BMS, and Break Through Cancer outside the submitted work. SDK receives clinical funding from AstraZeneca, Genentech, and Ionis; she also receives preclinical research funding from Roche. KS is founder and consultant for Faeth Therapeutics and Transomic Technologies. CK is the co-recipient of a Sponsored Research Agreement from Ion Beam Applications (IBA). AM is funded by the Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC IG 2018 Id.21763 and AIRC Programma di ricerca 5 per Mille 2019 Id.22737). MM declare grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, AC Biosciences and MSD outside the submitted work. ZSM has Scientific Advisory Board roles and equity options with Archeus Technologies and Seneca Therapeutics. JS owns stock and is a member of the Scientific Advisory Board of Surface Oncology, and is a member of the Scientific Advisory Board of Domain Therapeutics. RT has research grants to his institution from: Varian Medical Systems, Elekta Oncology, Accuray, Inc; scientific advisory board member for: Reflexion Medical, ImmuneSensor Therapeutics. AW acknowledge funding from AstraZeneca and imCORE. RW has stock and other ownership interests with Boost Therapeutics, Immvira LLC, Reflexion Pharmaceuticals, Coordination Pharmaceuticals Inc., Magi Therapeutics, Oncosenescence, Aqualung Therapeutics Corporation, and Cyntegron; he has served in a consulting or advisory role for Aettis Inc., AstraZeneca, Coordination Pharmaceuticals, Genus, Merck Serono S.A., Nano Proteagen, NKGen Biotech, Shuttle Pharmaceuticals, Highlight Therapeutics, S.L., Aqualung Therapeutics Corporation; he has research grants with Varian and Regeneron. RZ is scientific advisory board member of iTeos Therapeutics, receives research grant support from Bristol Myers Squibb and AstraZeneca, and is inventor on patent applications related to work on GITR, CTLA-4, and PD-1 (patent numbers: US20180244793A1; US10323091B2; WO2018106864A1; WO2019094352A1). SD has received compensation for consultant/advisory services from Lytix Biopharma, Mersana Therapeutics, EMD Serono, Ono Pharmaceutical, and Genentech, and research support from Lytix Biopharma and Boehringer-Ingelheim for unrelated projects. LG is/has been holding research contracts with Lytix Biopharma, Promontory and Onxeo, has received consulting/advisory honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, OmniSEQ, Onxeo, The Longevity Labs, Inzen, Imvax, Sotio, Promontory, Noxopharm, EduCom, and the Luke Heller TECPR2 Foundation, and holds Promontory stock options. ED reports grants and personal fees from Roche Genentech; grants from Servier; grants from AstraZeneca; grants and personal fees from Merck-Serono; grants from BMS; and grants from MSD outside the submitted work. SCF has Consultant: Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Varian, ViewRay, Accuray, Elekta, Janssen, Regeneron, GlaxoSmithKline, Eisai, Astra Zeneca, MedImmune, Merck US, EMD Serono/Merck, Genentech/ROCHE, Boehringer Ingelheim, Nanobiotix and Grant/Research: support from: Bristol Myers Squibb, Varian, Regeneron, Merck, Celldex. All other authors have no conflict of interest to declare., (© 2023 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.)

Background: Most patients with estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer do not respond to immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI); the tumor microenvironment (TME) of these cancers is generally immunosuppressive and contains few tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Radiation therapy (RT) can increase tumor inflammation and infiltration by lymphocytes but does not improve responses to ICIs in these patients. This may result, in part, from additional effects of RT that suppress anti-tumor immunity, including increased tumor infiltration by myeloid-derived suppressor cells and regulatory T cells. We hypothesized that anti-estrogens, which are a standard of care for ER+ breast cancer, may ameliorate these detrimental effects of RT by reducing the recruitment/ activation of suppressive immune populations in the radiated TME, increasing anti-tumor immunity and responsiveness to ICIs., Methods: To interrogate the effect of the selective estrogen receptor downregulator, fulvestrant, on the irradiated TME in the absence of confounding growth inhibition by fulvestrant on tumor cells, we used the TC11 murine model of anti-estrogen resistant ER+ breast cancer. Tumors were orthotopically transplanted into immunocompetent syngeneic mice. Once tumors were established, we initiated treatment with fulvestrant or vehicle, followed by external beam RT one week later. We examined the number and activity of tumor infiltrating immune cells using flow cytometry, microscopy, transcript levels, and cytokine profiles. We tested whether fulvestrant improved tumor response and animal survival when added to the combination of RT and ICI., Results: Despite resistance of TC11 tumors to anti-estrogen therapy alone, fulvestrant slowed tumor regrowth following RT, and significantly altered multiple immune populations in the irradiated TME. Fulvestrant reduced the influx of Ly6C+Ly6G+ cells, increased markers of pro-inflammatory myeloid cells and activated T cells, and augmented the ratio of CD8+: FOXP3+ T cells. In contrast to the minimal effects of ICIs when co-treated with either fulvestrant or RT alone, combinatorial treatment with fulvestrant, RT and ICIs significantly reduced tumor growth and prolonged survival., Conclusions: A combination of RT and fulvestrant can overcome the immunosuppressive TME in a preclinical model of ER+ breast cancer, enhancing the anti-tumor response and increasing the response to ICIs, even when growth of tumor cells is no longer estrogen sensitive., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

The in situ vaccine effect of radiation therapy (RT) has been shown to be limited in both preclinical and clinical settings, possibly due to the inadequacy of RT alone to stimulate in situ vaccination in immunologically "cold" tumor microenvironments (TMEs) and the mixed effects of RT in promoting tumor infiltration of both effector and suppressor immune cells. To address these limitations, we combined intratumoral injection of the radiated site with IL2 and a multifunctional nanoparticle (PIC). The local injection of these agents produced a cooperative effect that favorably immunomodulated the irradiated TME, enhancing the activation of tumor-infiltrating T cells and improving systemic anti-tumor T cell immunity. In syngeneic murine tumor models, the PIC+IL2+RT combination significantly improved the tumor response, surpassing the single or dual combinations of these treatments. Furthermore, this treatment led to the activation of tumor-specific immune memory and improved abscopal effects. Our findings suggest that this strategy can be used to augment the in situ vaccine effect of RT in clinical settings.

Radiation therapy (RT) activates an in situ vaccine effect when combined with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB), yet this effect may be limited because RT does not fully optimize tumor antigen presentation or fully overcome suppressive mechanisms in the tumor-immune microenvironment. To overcome this, we develop a multifunctional nanoparticle composed of polylysine, iron oxide, and CpG (PIC) to increase tumor antigen presentation, increase the ratio of M1:M2 tumor-associated macrophages, and enhance stimulation of a type I interferon response in conjunction with RT. In syngeneic immunologically "cold" murine tumor models, the combination of RT, PIC, and ICB significantly improves tumor response and overall survival resulting in cure of many mice and consistent activation of tumor-specific immune memory. Combining RT with PIC to elicit a robust in situ vaccine effect presents a simple and readily translatable strategy to potentiate adaptive anti-tumor immunity and augment response to ICB or potentially other immunotherapies., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Immunotherapies have demonstrated efficacy and survival benefits in some patients suffering from brain tumors; however, most do not respond and new approaches to enhance anti-tumor immunotherapeutic responses in the brain are needed. Radiotherapy remains a commonly used cancer treatment modality and can augment immunotherapeutic responses through multiple mechanisms. Recent preclinical studies may provide insight on how to optimally combine radiation and immunotherapies to maximize treatment efficacy. Unique aspects of the brain tumor microenvironment may play a critical role in limiting the successful application of immunotherapies in this location. Emerging studies suggest that such limits may be redressed through combination of immunotherapies with radiation therapy. In these settings, the latter may play a critical role in immunomodulating both tumor cells and the radiated brain tumor microenvironment. This review analyzes recent developments in combining radiation and immunotherapies to prime and better propagate anti-tumor immune response against brain tumors., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Current clinical trials are using radiation therapy (RT) to enhance an antitumor response elicited by high-dose interleukin (IL)-2 therapy or immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). Bempegaldesleukin (BEMPEG) is an investigational CD122-preferential IL-2 pathway agonist with prolonged in vivo half-life and preferential intratumoral expansion of T effector cells over T regulatory cells. BEMPEG has shown encouraging safety and efficacy in clinical trials when used in combination with PD-1 checkpoint blockade. In this study, we investigated the antitumor effect of local RT combined with BEMPEG in multiple immunologically 'cold' tumor models. Additionally, we asked if ICB could further enhance the local and distant antitumor effect of RT+BEMPEG in the setting of advanced solid tumors or metastatic disease., Methods: Mice bearing flank tumors (B78 melanoma, 4T1 breast cancer, or MOC2 head and neck squamous cell carcinoma) were treated with combinations of RT and immunotherapy (including BEMPEG, high-dose IL-2, anti(α)-CTLA-4, and α-PD-L1). Mice bearing B78 flank tumors were injected intravenously with B16 melanoma cells to mimic metastatic disease and were subsequently treated with RT and/or immunotherapy. Tumor growth and survival were monitored. Peripheral T cells and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes were assessed via flow cytometry., Results: A cooperative antitumor effect was observed in all models when RT was combined with BEMPEG, and RT increased IL-2 receptor expression on peripheral T cells. This cooperative interaction was associated with increased IL-2 receptor expression on peripheral T cells following RT. In the B78 melanoma model, RT+BEMPEG resulted in complete tumor regression in the majority of mice with a single ~400 mm 3 tumor. This antitumor response was T-cell dependent and supported by long-lasting immune memory. Adding ICB to RT+BEMPEG strengthened the antitumor response and cured the majority of mice with a single ~1000 mm 3 B78 tumor. In models with disseminated metastasis (B78 primary with B16 metastasis, 4T1, and MOC2), the triple combination of RT, BEMPEG, and ICB significantly improved primary tumor response and survival., Conclusion: The combination of local RT, BEMPEG, and ICB cured mice with advanced, immunologically cold tumors and distant metastasis in a T cell-dependent manner, suggesting this triple combination warrants clinical testing., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Radiopharmaceutical therapy or targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) is a well-established class of cancer therapeutics that includes a growing number of FDA-approved drugs and a promising pipeline of experimental therapeutics. Radiobiology is fundamental to a mechanistic understanding of the therapeutic capacity of these agents and their potential toxicities. However, the field of radiobiology has historically focused on external beam radiation. Critical differences exist between TRT and external beam radiotherapy with respect to dosimetry, dose rate, linear energy transfer, duration of treatment delivery, fractionation, range, and target volume. These distinctions simultaneously make it difficult to extrapolate from the radiobiology of external beam radiation to that of TRT and pose considerable challenges for preclinical and clinical studies investigating TRT. Here, we discuss these challenges and explore the current understanding of the radiobiology of radiopharmaceuticals., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

As immunotherapies continue to emerge as a standard component of treatment for a variety of cancers, the imperative for testing these in combination with other standard cancer therapies grows. Radiation therapy may be a particularly well-suited partner for many immunotherapies. By modulating immune tolerance and functional immunogenicity at a targeted tumor site, radiation therapy may serve as a method of in situ tumor vaccination. In situ tumor vaccination is a therapeutic strategy that seeks to convert a patient's own tumor into a nidus for enhanced presentation of tumor-specific antigens in a way that will stimulate and diversify an antitumor T cell response. The mechanisms whereby radiation may impact immunotherapy are diverse and include its capacity to simultaneously elicit local inflammation, temporary local depletion of suppressive lymphocyte lineages, enhanced tumor cell susceptibility to immune response, and immunogenic tumor cell death. Emerging data suggest that each of these mechanisms may display a distinct dose-response profile, making it challenging to maximize each of these effects using external beam radiation. Conversely, the highly heterogenous and conformal dose distribution achieved with brachytherapy may be optimal for enhancing the immunogenic capacity of radiation at a tumor site while minimizing off-target antagonistic effects on peripheral immune cells. Here, we review the immunogenic effects of radiation, summarize the clinical rationale and data supporting the use of radiation together with immunotherapies, and discuss the rationale and urgent need for further preclinical and clinical investigation specifically of brachytherapy in combination with immunotherapies. Harnessing these immunomodulatory effects of brachytherapy may offer solutions to overcome obstacles to the efficacy of immunotherapies in immunologically "cold" tumors while potentiating greater response in the context of immunologically "hot" tumors., (Copyright © 2018 American Brachytherapy Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

In situ vaccination is an emerging cancer treatment strategy that uses local therapies to stimulate a systemic antitumor immune response. We previously reported an in situ vaccination effect when combining radiation (RT) with intratumor (IT) injection of tumor-specific immunocytokine (IC), a fusion of tumor-specific antibody and IL2 cytokine. In mice bearing two tumors, we initially hypothesized that delivering RT plus IT-IC to the "primary" tumor would induce a systemic antitumor response causing regression of the "secondary" tumor. To test this, mice bearing one or two syngeneic murine tumors of B78 melanoma and/or Panc02 pancreatic cancer were treated with combined external beam RT and IT-IC to the designated "primary" tumor only. Primary and secondary tumor response as well as animal survival were monitored. Immunohistochemistry and quantitative real-time PCR were used to quantify tumor infiltration with regulatory T cells (Treg). Transgenic "DEREG" mice or IgG2a anti-CTLA-4 were used to transiently deplete tumor Tregs. Contrary to our initial hypothesis, we observed that the presence of an untreated secondary tumor antagonized the therapeutic effect of RT + IT-IC delivered to the primary tumor. We observed reciprocal tumor specificity for this effect, which was circumvented if all tumors received RT or by transient depletion of Tregs. Primary tumor treatment with RT + IT-IC together with systemic administration of Treg-depleting anti-CTLA-4 resulted in a renewed in situ vaccination effect. Our findings show that untreated tumors can exert a tumor-specific, Treg-dependent, suppressive effect on the efficacy of in situ vaccination and demonstrate clinically viable approaches to overcome this effect. Untreated tumor sites antagonize the systemic and local antitumor immune response to an in situ vaccination regimen. This effect is radiation sensitive and may be mediated by tumor-specific regulatory T cells harbored in the untreated tumor sites. Cancer Immunol Res; 6(7); 825-34. ©2018 AACR ., (©2018 American Association for Cancer Research.)

The practice of radiation oncology is primarily based on precise technical delivery of highly conformal, image-guided external beam radiotherapy or brachytherapy. However, systematic research efforts are being made to facilitate individualised radiation dose prescriptions on the basis of gene-expressssion profiles that reflect the radiosensitivity of tumour and normal tissue. This advance in precision radiotherapy should complement those benefits made in precision cancer medicine that use molecularly targeted agents and immunotherapies. The personalisation of cancer therapy, predicated largely on genomic interrogation, is facilitating the selection of therapies that are directed against driver mutations, aberrant cell signalling, tumour microenvironments, and genetic susceptibilities. With the increasing technical power of radiotherapy to safely increase local tumour control for many solid tumours, it is an opportune time to rigorously explore the potential benefits of combining radiotherapy with molecular targeted agents and immunotherapies to increase cancer survival outcomes. This theme provides the basis and foundation for this American Society for Radiation Oncology guideline on combining radiotherapy with molecular targeting and immunotherapy agents., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: The purpose of this project was to survey radiation oncology chief residents to define their residency experience and readiness for independent practice., Methods and Materials: During the academic years 2013 to 2014 and 2014 to 2015, the Association of Residents in Radiation Oncology (ARRO) conducted an electronic survey of post-graduate year-5 radiation oncology residents in the United States during the final 3 months of training. Descriptive statistics are reported., Results: Sixty-six chief residents completed the survey in 2013 to 2014 (53% response rate), and 69 completed the survey in 2014 to 2015 (64% response rate). Forty to 85% percent of residents reported inadequate exposure to high-dose rate and low-dose rate brachytherapy. Nearly all residents in both years (>90%) reported adequate clinical experience for the following disease sites: breast, central nervous system, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, head and neck, and lung. However, as few as 56% reported adequate experience in lymphoma or pediatric malignancies. More than 90% of residents had participated in retrospective research projects, with 20% conducting resident-led prospective clinical trials and 50% conducting basic science or translational projects. Most chief residents reported working 60 or fewer hours per week in the clinical/hospital setting and performing fewer than 15 hours per week tasks that were considered to have little or no educational value. There was more than 80% compliance with Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) work hour limits. Fifty-five percent of graduating residents intended to join an established private practice group, compared to 25% who headed for academia. Residents perceive the job market to be more competitive than previous years., Conclusions: This first update of the ARRO chief resident survey since the 2007 to 2008 academic year documents US radiation oncology residents' experiences and conditions over a 2-year period. This analysis may serve as a valuable tool for those seeking to improve training of the next generation of oncology leaders., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The development of molecular targeted therapeutics in oncology builds on many years of scientific investigation into the cellular mechanics of malignant transformation and progression. The past two decades have brought an accelerating pace to the clinical investigation of new molecular targeted agents, particularly in the setting of metastatic disease. The integration of molecular targeted agents into phase III clinical trial design has lagged in the curative treatment setting, particularly in combination with established therapeutic modalities such as radiation. In this review, we discuss the interaction of radiation and molecular targeted therapeutics. The dynamics of cellular and tumor response to radiation offer unique opportunities for beneficial interplay with molecular targeted agents that may go unrecognized with conventional screening and monotherapy clinical testing of novel agents. By using epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) as a primary example, we discuss recent clinical studies that illustrate the potential synergy of molecular targeted agents with radiation and highlight the clinical value of such interactions. For various molecular targeted agents, their greatest clinical impact may rest in combination with radiation, and efforts to facilitate systematic investigation of this approach appear highly warranted., (© 2014 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.)