Search

Purpose: Providers treating adults with advanced cancer increasingly seek to engage patients and surrogates in advance care planning (ACP) and end-of-life (EOL) decision making; however, anxiety and depression may interfere with engagement. The intersection of these two key phenomena is examined among patients with metastatic cancer and their surrogates: the need to prepare for and engage in ACP and EOL decision making and the high prevalence of anxiety and depression., Methods: Using a critical review framework, we examine the specific ways that anxiety and depression are likely to affect both ACP and EOL decision making., Results: The review indicates that depression is associated with reduced compliance with treatment recommendations, and high anxiety may result in avoidance of difficult discussions involved in ACP and EOL decision making. Depression and anxiety are associated with increased decisional regret in the context of cancer treatment decision making, as well as a preference for passive (not active) decision making in an intensive care unit setting. Anxiety about death in patients with advanced cancer is associated with lower rates of completion of an advance directive or discussion of EOL wishes with the oncologist. Patients with advanced cancer and elevated anxiety report higher discordance between wanted versus received life-sustaining treatments, less trust in their physicians, and less comprehension of the information communicated by their physicians., Conclusion: Anxiety and depression are commonly elevated among adults with advanced cancer and health care surrogates, and can result in less engagement and satisfaction with ACP, cancer treatment, and EOL decisions. We offer practical strategies and sample scripts for oncology care providers to use to reduce the effects of anxiety and depression in these contexts.

Background: Up to half of adults with advanced cancer report anxiety or depression symptoms, which can cause avoidance of future planning. We present a study protocol for an innovative, remotely-delivered, acceptance-based, multi-modal palliative care intervention that addresses advance care planning (ACP) and unmet psychological needs commonly experienced by adults with metastatic cancer., Methods: A two-armed, prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) randomizes 240 adults with Stage IV (and select Stage III) solid tumor cancer who report moderate to high anxiety or depression symptoms to either the multi-modal intervention or usual care. The intervention comprises five weekly two-hour group sessions (plus a booster session one month later) delivered via video conferencing, with online self-paced modules and check-ins completed between the group sessions. Intervention content is based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), an acceptance, mindfulness, and values-based model. Participants are recruited from a network of community cancer care clinics, with group sessions led by the network's oncology clinical social workers. Participants are assessed at baseline, mid-intervention, post-intervention, and 2-month follow-up. The primary outcome is ACP completion; secondary outcomes include anxiety and depression symptoms, fear of dying, and sense of life meaning. Relationships between anxiety/depression symptoms and ACP will be evaluated cross-sectionally and longitudinally and theory-based putative mediators will be examined., Discussion: Among adults with advanced cancer in community oncology settings, this RCT will provide evidence regarding the efficacy of the group ACT intervention on ACP and psychosocial outcomes as well as examine the relationship between ACP and anxiety/ depression symptoms. This trial aims to advance palliative care science and inform clinical practice., Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04773639 on February 26, 2021., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: Adults with metastatic cancer frequently report anxiety and depression symptoms, which may impact health behaviors such as advance care planning (ACP). Objective: The study leveraged acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), an evidence-based approach for reducing distress and improving health behaviors, and adapted it into a multimodal intervention (M-ACT) designed to address the psychosocial and ACP needs of anxious and depressed adults with metastatic cancer. The study evaluated M-ACT's acceptability, feasibility, and efficacy potential. Design: The study was designed as a single-arm intervention development and pilot trial. Setting/Subjects: The trial enrolled 35 anxious or depressed adults with stage IV cancer in community oncology clinics, with a referred-to-enrolled rate of 69% and eligible-to-enrolled rate of 95%. Measurements: M-ACT alternated four in-person group sessions with three self-paced online sessions. Acceptability and feasibility were assessed through enrollment, attendance, and satisfaction ratings. Outcomes and theorized intervention mechanisms were evaluated at baseline, midintervention, postintervention, and two-month follow-up. Results: Participant feedback was used to refine the intervention. Of participants starting the intervention, 92% completed, reporting high satisfaction. One-quarter did not begin M-ACT due to health declines, moving, or death. Completers showed significant reductions in anxiety, depression, and fear of dying and increases in ACP and sense of life meaning. In this pilot, M-ACT showed no significant impact on pain interference. Increases in two of three mechanism measures predicted improvement on 80% of significant outcomes. Conclusions: The M-ACT intervention is feasible, acceptable, and shows potential for efficacy in community oncology settings; a randomized trial is warranted.

Background: Anxiety is a common concern of cancer survivors during the transition from active cancer treatment to cancer survivorship (the re-entry phase). This paper presents the study protocol for a novel group-based behavioral intervention to improve mental health, well-being, and medical use outcomes among anxious cancer survivors at re-entry., Methods/design: This two-armed, prospective randomized controlled trial will randomize a minimum of 100 re-entry-phase cancer survivors with moderate to high anxiety to the intervention or a usual care control condition. The intervention is delivered in a group format over 7 weeks; content is based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), an acceptance, mindfulness, and values-based intervention. Participants will be recruited from community cancer care centers and the intervention will be led by the onsite clinical social workers. Participants will be assessed at baseline, mid-intervention, post-intervention, and 3- and 6-month follow-up. ACT participants will complete process measures before the beginning of group sessions 2, 4, and 6; all participants will complete the process measures during the regular assessments. The primary outcome is anxiety symptoms; secondary outcomes include anxiety disorder severity, fear of recurrence, depressive symptoms, cancer-related trauma symptoms, sense of life meaning, vitality/fatigue, and medical utilization., Discussion: This clinical trial will provide valuable evidence regarding the efficacy of the group ACT intervention in community oncology settings., Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02550925 .

Objective: A growing number of cancer antineoplastic agents can cause life-threatening acute infusion reactions. Because previous studies have not studied these reactions from the perspective of patients, this study was undertaken with that objective in mind., Methods: Patients who had an acute infusion reaction were interviewed based on the Leventhal model. Once saturation of content was achieved, interviews were transcribed and analyzed with qualitative methodology., Results: Twenty-one patients were enrolled. Most were women (n = 15); the median age was 58 years, and paclitaxel was the most common inciting agent. Three themes emerged. First, these reactions are frightening; patients made remarks such as "I was just thinking oh my God, I am dying." Second, prior education about these reactions seemed to mitigate this fear, "Basically everything the nurses told me potentially could happen, like happened. So, I was prepared." Third, when health-care providers were prompt and attentive during the reaction, patients described less fear with future chemotherapy, "So no, I'm really not fearful about going in tomorrow because I know they'll be there and they'll be watching me.", Conclusion: These reactions evoke fear which can be mitigated with education prior to and with prompt responsiveness during the acute infusion reaction.

One strategy for inhibiting tumour cell growth is the use of polyamine mimetics to depress endogenous polyamine levels and, ideally, obstruct critical polyamine-requiring reactions. Such polyamine analogues make very unusual drugs, in that extremely high intracellular concentrations are required for growth inhibition or cytotoxicity. Cells exposed to even sub-micromolar concentrations of such analogues can achieve effective intracellular levels because these compounds are incorporated by the very aggressive polyamine uptake system. Once incorporated to these levels, many of these analogues induce the synthesis of a regulatory protein, antizyme, which inhibits both polyamine synthesis and the transporter they used to enter the cell. Thus this feedback system allows steady-state maintenance of effective cellular doses of such analogues. Accordingly, effective cellular levels of polyamine analogues are generally inversely related to their capacity to induce antizyme. Antizyme activity is down-regulated by interaction with several binding partners, most notably antizyme inhibitor, and at least a few tumour tissues exhibit deficiencies in antizyme expression. Our studies explore the role of antizyme induction by several polyamine analogues in their physiological response and the possibility that cell-to-cell differences in antizyme expression may contribute to variable sensitivities to these agents.

Purpose: To increase awareness of cultural differences in the disclosure of a cancer diagnosis or prognosis, the author reviews several surveys of patients and physicians from around the world., Overview: The Western medical community is increasingly emphasizing full truthful disclosure of cancer diagnoses or prognoses and respect for autonomy as necessary prerequisites to ethical practice. However, surveys of European, Japanese, Native American, and various ethnic American (including Korean, Chinese, Mexican, Hispanic, African, and European American) cancer patients and physicians reveal that many cultures consider complete and accurate disclosure of cancer undesirable. Cultural differences in the rates of disclosure of a cancer diagnosis or prognosis; the physician's use of euphemisms to give a true or false diagnosis; as well as considerations of how to disclose a cancer diagnosis are described., Clinical Implications: Developing an awareness about cross-cultural practices regarding cancer disclosure issues allows the clinician to become more sensitive to the expectations of culturally and individually diverse cancer patients. To this end, all healthcare professionals should be informed about how the patient would like to be informed of a diagnosis and how involved he or she would like family members to be. In addition, an awareness of the use of nonverbal communication in some cultures and the psychosocial impact of certain terms, such as "cancer," is essential. Often, phrases such as "malignant tumor" or "growth" are less inflammatory and are more readily accepted. In ascertaining a knowledge of various cultural preferences and developing a sensitivity to these preferences, clinicians are better able to provide effective care to individuals from a variety of cultural and individual backgrounds.