Search

Next-generation sequencing is becoming increasingly important for the diagnosis, risk stratification, and management of patients with established or suspected myeloid malignancies. These tests are being incorporated into clinical practice guidelines and many genetic alterations now constitute disease classification criteria. However, the reimbursement for these tests is uncertain. This study analyzed the clinical impact, ordering practices, prior authorization, and reimbursement outcomes of 505 samples from 477 patients sequenced with a 50-gene myeloid next-generation sequencing panel or a 15-gene myeloproliferative neoplasm subpanel. Overall, 98% (496 of 505) of tests provided clinically useful data. Eighty-nine percent of test results, including negative findings, informed or clarified potential diagnoses, 94% of results informed potential prognoses, and 19% of tests identified a potential therapeutic target. Sequencing results helped risk-stratify patients whose bone marrow biopsy specimens were inconclusive for dysplasia, monitor genetic evolution associated with disease progression, and delineate patients with mutation-defined diagnoses. Despite the clinical value, prior authorization from commercial payors or managed government payors was approved for less than half (45%) of requests. Only 51% of all cases were reimbursed, with lack of medical necessity frequently cited as a reason for denial. This study demonstrates the existence of a substantial gap between clinical utility and payor policies on test reimbursement., Competing Interests: Disclosure Statement S.J.H. has received honoraria from AstraZeneca and institutional research funding from Bristol Myers Squibb. G.B. has received honoraria from Blueprint Medicines., (Copyright © 2024 Association for Molecular Pathology and American Society for Investigative Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims: Targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) panels, which identify genomic alterations, are the stronghold of molecular oncology laboratories. In spite of technological advances, the quantity and quality of DNA from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue and paucicellular specimens are barriers to successful sequencing. Here, we describe an NGS assay employing single tube stem-loop inhibition mediated amplification technology that delivers highly accurate results with low input DNA. Rigorous quality metrics, regular monitoring and in-depth validation make the test attractive for clinical laboratories., Methods: The study used a customised NGS panel, targeting 48 genes across several solid tumour types. Validation, in accordance with guidelines from New York State, sequenced patient samples harbouring 136 known variants, including single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) and indels. Specimen types included formalin-fixed paraffin embedded blocks, core biopsies and cytology material. Neoplastic cellularity of the tumours ranged from 10% to 80%., Results: The assay was highly specific and sensitive with excellent accuracy, reproducibility and repeatability/precision. Concordant results for identification of SNVs and indels were obtained from specimens with DNA input of 2-3 ng, tissue with 10% neoplastic cellularity and variant allelic frequencies of 2.5%-3%. Over 99% of the target areas are shown to achieve at least 500X coverage when parsed through two bioinformatics pipelines. With over 2000 clinical specimens analysed, the success of the panel for reporting of results is 95.3% CONCLUSIONS: The advanced technology enables accurate identification of clinically relevant variants with uniformity of coverage and an impressive turn-around-time. The overall workflow and cost-effectiveness provide added value., Competing Interests: Competing interests: HF has received consulting fees from Opentrons Labworks and PIllar Biosciences. SH has received consulting fees from Opentron Labworks and Loxo Oncology and honoraria from Illumina and Medscape., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Tumour mutational burden (TMB) is used to predict response to immunotherapies. Although several groups have proposed calculation methods for TMB, a clear consensus has not yet emerged. In this study, we explored TMB calculation approaches with a 586-gene cancer panel (1.75 Mb) benchmarked to TMB measured by whole-exome sequencing (WES), using 30 samples across a range of tumour types. We explored variant allelic fraction (VAF) cut-offs of 5% and 10%, population database filtering at 0.001, 0.0001 and 0.000025, as well as different combinations of synonymous, insertion/deletion and intronic (splice site) variants, as well as exclusion of hotspot mutations, and examined the effect on TMB correlation. Good correlation (Spearman, range 0.66-0.78) between WES and panel TMB was seen across all methods evaluated. Each method of TMB calculation evaluated showed good positive per cent agreement and negative per cent agreement using 10 mutations/Mb as a cut-off, suggesting that multiple TMB calculation approaches may yield comparable results., Competing Interests: Competing interests: SJH has received consulting fees from Opentrons Labworks and Loxo Oncology and honoraria from Illumina and Medscape., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Targetable NTRK gene fusions can be detected across tumor types using methodologies such as pan-TRK IHC, DNA or RNA NGS testing, or FISH. Challenges for implementation of clinical testing for NTRK fusions may arise due to the range in NTRK fusion prevalence across tumors, endogenous levels of TRK expression in tissues, and the large number of potential fusion partners. In this study, we examined our experience evaluating driver mutation negative lung, urothelial or cholangiocarcinoma cases, in addition to cases with positive, equivocal, or weak staining by pan-TRK IHC for NTRK fusions. 63/127 (49.6%) of these cases were positive for pan-TRK IHC, of which 71.4% showed weak or focal staining, potentially due to physiologic or non-specific TRK expression. Of these 127 cases, 4 harbored a NTRK fusion (1 fusion was seen in two separate samples from the same patient) as confirmed by RNA fusion panel testing. Pan-TRK IHC was positive in 1 case with TPM3-NTRK1 fusion, equivocal in 1 case with GOLGA4-NTRK3 fusion, and negative in 2 samples with ADAM19-NTRK3 fusion. Our findings show that we were able to successfully identify NTRK fusions that resulted in targeted therapy. However, our results suggest limited sensitivity of pan-TRK IHC for NTRK3 fusions, and that the reduced specificity for pan-TRK IHC in tumors with physiologic or non-specific TRK expression, results in false positive samples that require confirmatory testing by RNA based NGS., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Aim: Microsatellite instability (MSI), a hallmark of DNA mismatch repair deficiency, is a key molecular biomarker with multiple clinical implications including the selection of patients for immunotherapy, identifying patients who may have Lynch syndrome and predicting prognosis in patients with colorectal tumours. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) provides the opportunity to interrogate large numbers of microsatellite loci concurrently with genomic variants. We sought to develop a method to detect MSI that would not require paired normal tissue and would leverage the sequence data obtained from a broad range of tumours tested using our 467-gene NGS Columbia Combined Cancer Panel (CCCP)., Methods: Altered mononucleotide and dinucleotide microsatellite loci across the CCCP region of interest were evaluated in clinical samples encompassing a diverse range of tumour types. The number of altered loci was used to develop a decision tree classifier model trained on the retrospectively collected cohort of 107 clinical cases sequenced by the CCCP assay., Results: The classifier was able to correctly classify all cases and was then used to analyse a test set of clinical cases (n=112) and was able to correctly predict their MSI status with 100% sensitivity and specificity. Analysis of recurrently altered loci identified alterations in genes involved in DNA repair, signalling and transcriptional regulation pathways, many of which have been implicated in MSI tumours., Conclusion: This study highlights the utility of this approach, which should be applicable to laboratories performing similar testing., Competing Interests: Competing interests: SH has the following disclosures: honoraria from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Loxo Oncology and research funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

This multi-institutional study was undertaken to evaluate interrater reliability of the 2017 Association for Molecular Pathology/American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guidelines for interpretation and reporting of oncology sequence variants and to assess current practices and perceptions surrounding these guidelines. Fifty-one variants were distributed to 20 participants from 10 institutions for classification using the new guidelines. Agreement was assessed using chance-corrected agreement (Cohen κ). κ was 0.35. To evaluate if data sharing could help resolve disagreements, a summary of variant classifications and additional information about each variant were distributed to all participants. κ improved to 0.7 after the original classifications were revised. Participants were invited to take a web-based survey regarding their perceptions of the guidelines. Only 20% (n = 3) of the survey respondents had prior experience with the guidelines in clinical practice. The main perceived barriers to guideline implementation included the complexity of the guidelines, discordance between clinical actionability and pathobiologic relevance, lack of familiarity with the new classifications, and uncertainty when applying criteria to potential germline variants. This study demonstrates noteworthy discordances between pathologists for variant classification in solid tumors when using the 2017 Association for Molecular Pathology/American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guidelines. These findings highlight potential areas for clarification/refinement before mainstream clinical adoption., (Copyright © 2020 American Society for Investigative Pathology and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Genomic test results collected during the provision of medical care and stored in Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems represent an opportunity for clinical research into disease heterogeneity and clinical outcomes. In this paper, we evaluate the use of genomic test reports ordered for cancer patients in order to derive cancer subtypes and to identify biological pathways predictive of poor survival outcomes. A novel method is proposed to calculate patient similarity based on affected biological pathways rather than gene mutations. We demonstrate that this approach identifies subtypes of prognostic value and biological pathways linked to survival, with implications for precision treatment selection and a better understanding of the underlying disease. We also share lessons learned regarding the opportunities and challenges of secondary use of observational genomic data to conduct such research., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

We developed and validated a clinical whole-genome and transcriptome sequencing (WGTS) assay that provides a comprehensive genomic profile of a patient's tumor. The ability to fully capture the mappable genome with sufficient sequencing coverage to precisely call DNA somatic single nucleotide variants, insertions/deletions, copy number variants, structural variants, and RNA gene fusions was analyzed. New York State's Department of Health next-generation DNA sequencing guidelines were expanded for establishing performance validation applicable to whole-genome and transcriptome sequencing. Whole-genome sequencing laboratory protocols were validated for the Illumina HiSeq X Ten platform and RNA sequencing for Illumina HiSeq2500 platform for fresh or frozen and formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor samples. Various bioinformatics tools were also tested, and CIs for sensitivity and specificity thresholds in calling clinically significant somatic aberrations were determined. The validation was performed on a set of 125 tumor normal pairs. RNA sequencing was performed to call fusions and to confirm the DNA variants or exonic alterations. Here, we present our results and WGTS standards for variant allele frequency, reproducibility, analytical sensitivity, and present limit of detection analysis for single nucleotide variant calling, copy number identification, and structural variants. We show that The New York Genome Center WGTS clinical assay can provide a comprehensive patient variant discovery approach suitable for directed oncologic therapeutic applications., (Copyright © 2018 American Society for Investigative Pathology and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Large cancer panels are being increasingly used in the practice of precision medicine to generate genomic profiles of tumors with the goal of identifying targetable variants and guiding eligibility for clinical trials. To facilitate identification of mutations in a broad range of solid and hematological malignancies, a 467-gene oncology panel (Columbia Combined Cancer Panel) was developed in collaboration with pathologists and oncologists and is currently available and in use for clinical diagnostics. Herein, we share our experience with this testing in an academic medical center. Of 255 submitted specimens, which encompassed a diverse range of tumor types, we were able to successfully sequence 92%. The Columbia Combined Cancer Panel assay led to the detection of a targetable variant in 48.7% of cases. However, although we show good clinical performance and diagnostic yield, third-party reimbursement has been poor. Reimbursement from government and third-party payers using the 81455 Current Procedural Terminology code was at 19.4% of billed costs, and 55% of cases were rejected on first submission. Likely contributing factors to this low level of reimbursement are the delays in valuation of the 81455 Current Procedural Terminology code and in establishing national or local coverage determinations. In the absence of additional demonstrations of clinical utility and improved patient outcomes, we expect the reimbursement environment will continue to limit the availability of this testing more broadly., (Copyright © 2017 American Society for Investigative Pathology and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Mutant allele specific imbalance (MASI) was initially coined to describe copy number alterations associated with the mutant allele of an oncogene. The copy number gain (CNG) specific to the mutant allele can be readily observed in electropherograms. With the development of genome-wide analyses at base-pair resolution with copy number counts, we can now further differentiate MASI into those with CNG, with copy neutral alteration (also termed acquired uniparental disomy; UPD), or with loss of heterozygosity (LOH) due to the loss of the wild-type (WT) allele. Here we summarize the occurrence of MASI with CNG, aUPD, or MASI with LOH in some major oncogenes (such as EGFR, KRAS, PIK3CA, and BRAF). We also discuss how these various classifications of MASI have been demonstrated to impact tumorigenesis, progression, metastasis, prognosis, and potentially therapeutic responses in cancer, notably in lung, colorectal, and pancreatic cancers., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Molecular characterization has the potential to advance the management of pediatric cancer and high-risk hematologic disease. The clinical integration of genome sequencing into standard clinical practice has been limited and the potential utility of genome sequencing to identify clinically impactful information beyond targetable alterations has been underestimated., Methods: The Precision in Pediatric Sequencing (PIPseq) Program at Columbia University Medical Center instituted prospective clinical next generation sequencing (NGS) for pediatric cancer and hematologic disorders at risk for treatment failure. We performed cancer whole exome sequencing (WES) of patient-matched tumor-normal samples and RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) of tumor to identify sequence variants, fusion transcripts, relative gene expression, and copy number variation (CNV). A directed cancer gene panel assay was used when sample adequacy was a concern. Constitutional WES of patients and parents was performed when a constitutionally encoded disease was suspected. Results were initially reviewed by a molecular pathologist and subsequently by a multi-disciplinary molecular tumor board. Clinical reports were issued to the ordering physician and posted to the patient's electronic medical record., Results: NGS was performed on tumor and/or normal tissue from 101 high-risk pediatric patients. Potentially actionable alterations were identified in 38% of patients, of which only 16% subsequently received matched therapy. In an additional 38% of patients, the genomic data provided clinically relevant information of diagnostic, prognostic, or pharmacogenomic significance. RNA-seq was clinically impactful in 37/65 patients (57%) providing diagnostic and/or prognostic information for 17 patients (26%) and identified therapeutic targets in 15 patients (23%). Known or likely pathogenic germline alterations were discovered in 18/90 patients (20%) with 14% having germline alternations in cancer predisposition genes. American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) secondary findings were identified in six patients., Conclusions: Our results demonstrate the feasibility of incorporating clinical NGS into pediatric hematology-oncology practice. Beyond the identification of actionable alterations, the ability to avoid ineffective/inappropriate therapies, make a definitive diagnosis, and identify pharmacogenomic modifiers is clinically impactful. Taking a more inclusive view of potential clinical utility, 66% of cases tested through our program had clinically impactful findings and samples interrogated with both WES and RNA-seq resulted in data that impacted clinical decisions in 75% of cases.