Search

The molecular approach to cancer has identified specific abnormalities that contribute to malignant pathogenesis in an aetiological manner and define individuals who are at higher risk for specific malignancies. Studies of cancer distribution in families suggest that 15-20% of all malignancies may have a significant germ line hereditable mutation that directly or indirectly contributes to tumour development. Additionally, the identification of many genetically-determined polymorphisms that regulate carcinogen metabolism indicate that their assessment may contribute to selecting individuals for preventive surveillance or intervention as well. Locating individuals in the population who have moderate to high risk germ line mutations in critical oncogenic regulatory genes and assessing a panel of polymorphisms that underlie a significant attributable risk for cancer development may allow the recruitment of individuals at high risk for a particular malignancy and, therefore, represent good candidates for either directed organ surveillance and/or chemoprevention trials.

If one were to wait for the perfect set of experimental results before launching a multi-agent chemoprevention or large risk reduction study, the trial would never be launched. On the other hand, non-scientific considerations have led to the premature launching of at least three prominent studies (CARET, Carotene and Retinol Efficacy Trial; ATBC, Apha Tocopherol Beta Carotene; PCPT, Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial) and the much delayed start-up of another, BCPT, the Breast Cancer Prevention Trial. Strong epidemiologic data by itself should not be adequate to justify starting a large trial; experimental and/or clinical data should be developed. On the other hand fear of secondary adverse events that are of low incidence should not be enough to delay a trial if the overall health benefit could be high. The development of multiagent chemoprevention trials requires that each agent is active and additively or synergistically so in combination in preclinical models. Additionally, side effects of each agent should be non-overlapping and low to non-existent, preferably a feature determined in formal phase IIa and IIb trials. These principles will be discussed in the context of prior (CARET, ATBC) and ongoing (EUROSCAN, acetylcysteine/retinol), as well as proposed future trials (difluromethyl/sulindac).

D,L-alpha-difluoromethylornithine (DFMO) was synthesized over 20 years ago. It was hoped that this enzyme-activated, irreversible inhibitor of ornithine decarboxylase, the first enzyme in polyamine synthesis, would be effective as a chemotherapy for hyperproliferative diseases, including cancer and/or infectious processes. DFMO was generally found to exert cytostatic effects on mammalian cells and tissues, and its effectiveness as a therapeutic agent has been modest. DFMO was also found to cause treatment-limiting (but reversible) ototoxicity at high doses. This side effect, along with its minimal therapeutic activity, contributed to the loss of interest by many clinicians in further developing DFMO as a cancer therapeutic agent. However, DFMO was subsequently shown to inhibit carcinogen-induced cancer development in a number of rodent models, and interest in developing this compound as a preventive agent has increased. The rationale for the inhibition of ornithine decarboxylase as a cancer chemopreventive agent has been strengthened in recent years because this enzyme has been shown to be transactivated by the c-myc oncogene in certain cell/tissue types and to cooperate with the ras oncogene in malignant transformation of epithelial tissues. Recent clinical cancer chemoprevention trials, using dose de-escalation designs, indicate that DFMO can be given over long periods of time at low doses that suppress polyamine contents in gastrointestinal and other epithelial tissues but cause no detectable hearing loss or other side effects. Current clinical chemoprevention trials are investigating the efficacy of DFMO to suppress surrogate end point biomarkers (e.g., colon polyp recurrence) of carcinogenesis in patient populations at elevated risk for the development of specific epithelial cancers, including colon, esophageal, breast, cutaneous, and prostate malignancies.

The field of chemoprevention of cancer in humans is at a teenage level of maturity. There is anticipation and energy, and some promising results have come in, but it's unclear whether the entire enterprise is worth the effort. Reflecting on the status of the organism and where we are in its developmental history is therefore an important exercise at this time. Empirical and philosophical perspectives are offered for several key questions: Why prevent Cancer? What is the preclinical evidence that chemoprevention of cancer in humans should work? What is the clinical evidence that chemoprevention agents work? What is the clinical evidence that chemoprevention agent don't work? What is the status of ongoing randomized phase III/IV chemoprevention trials? The answers to each of these questions provide a part of the scaffold for a logical platform for the launching of the chemoprevention imperative as an integral part of our approach to the overall management of human cancer.

A substantial amount of epidemiologic and laboratory data indicates that the majority of human cancers should be preventable. In this article, the biologic basis of cancer prevention is presented and the major factors contributing to the initiation, promotion, and progression of cancer in humans detailed. These include tobacco, ultraviolet and ionizing (radon) radiation, certain chemicals (asbestos, aniline dyes), and viruses--both sexually transmitted and endemic. Dietary factors both enhance and inhibit carcinogenesis in humans. In this article, the roles of fat, fiber, and beta-carotene are reviewed with respect to the genesis of breast, colon, prostate, lung, and oral cancers. A large number of prevention trials involving most common malignancies are being conducted in the United States and abroad. This article considers the major strategies and methodology of prevention trials and outlines the major trials now in progress.

Detection of cancer is the definitive endpoint in the conduct of chemoprevention trials. There are, however, several reasons why cancer as the endpoint may not be feasible or ethical: 1) the usage of patients with easily followable preneoplasias may preclude the development of cancer, and 2) the time to a cancer event may be long or the incidence uncommon, even in individuals at high risk. Two major types of biomarker intermediate endpoints should be considered: 1) those that identify individuals at high risk and 2) those that serve as a surrogate for cancer. Various epidemiologic features, including family history, have been used to estimate relative risk. This approach, however, only slightly decreases the size of populations needed for chemoprevention trials and only little addresses the question of individual risk. Advances in understanding the genetic basis for cancer will lead to the development of probes that will help assess risk for many cancers. Innumerable biomarker intermediate endpoints can be identified as associated with cancer formation, including genetic, epigenetic, and histologic features. The challenge is not in identifying potential biomarker intermediate endpoints but in showing that they are relevant. Carcinogenesis has been shown to be carcinogen, inhibitor, dose, tissue, and species specific; it is likely that relevant biomarker intermediate endpoints will need to be identified, studied, and verified in human models. The upper aerodigestive system should be a rich source for biomarker intermediate endpoint studies, as tissue is readily available, the carcinogenic process can be monitored, and there are currently available reasonable compounds to use in biomarker intermediate endpoint modulation and chemoprevention trials.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Chemoprevention is a relatively new area of clinical cancer research. In this article we have presented a general overview of the concepts as well as the status of ongoing clinical trials using the most promising agents in selected populations. The reader is referred to recent excellent reviews presenting more detailed discussions of the various topics discussed, such as the selection process for new agents, in vitro and animal model screening procedures, epidemiologic studies, and other agents now being screened and tested for potential clinical study. Increased understanding of the biology of carcinogenesis will undoubtedly lead to new ideas and approaches. Pathways for conversion of proto-oncogenes to tumor-supporting oncogenes, the mechanisms of action of tumor suppressor genes, and the involvement of abnormal growth factor responses in producing "field cancerization" are some examples of future targets for chemopreventive intervention. Long-term goals of this effort will include application of the results of early promising prevention studies, such as those in oral premalignant lesions, to the design of carefully controlled trials to demonstrate actual inhibition of cancer occurrence. In the laboratory, basic studies need to be conducted to increase our understanding of the molecular events underlying carcinogenesis, in order to identify additional targets for new agents to enhance the clinical efforts. Some of the most exciting developments in the control of cancer over the next decade will very likely result from this chemopreventive approach, with application not only to prevention of the first or primary malignancy, especially in high risk populations, but also to clinical situations traditionally considered to be in the domain of chemotherapeutic strategies, such as adjuvant treatment after definitive therapy of a primary cancer.

A potential application of the human tumor stem cell colony assay is to guide Phase II clinical investigations by identifying classes of tumors (or individual patients) which are sensitive in vitro to a new antitumor compound. We have tested human tumor stem cells from 140 tumor biopsies representing 20 different tumor types for chemosensitivity to the Phase II drug 4'-(9-acridinylamino)methanesulfon-m-anisidide. In vitro sensitivity was defined as a reduction in the number of tumor colony-forming cells to 30% of the control or less after a 1-hr exposure to one-tenth of the pharmacologically achievable plasma concentration of 4'-(9-acridinylamino)methanesulfon-m-anisidide. In vitro sensitivity was found in 29 cases: non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (2 of 2); cervical carcinoma (1 of 1); sarcoma (3 of 6); neuroblastoma (1 of 2); acute myelogenous leukemia (6 of 16); chronic myelogenous leukemia (1 of 3); melanoma (8 of 34); uterine carcinoma (1 of 5); lung carcinoma (1 of 9); ovarian carcinoma (4 of 36); and breast carcinoma (1 of 11). Prospective in vitro-in vivo correlations in eight patients with various tumor types showed that three of three patients sensitive in vitro to 4'-(9-acridinylamino)methanesulfon-m-anisidide responded in vivo, while five of five patients resistant in vitro had no clinical response. The results provide support for further evaluation of the utility of the human tumor stem cell colony assay for targeting Phase II clinical trials.

13-cis-Retinoic acid (13-CRA) is a synthetic analog of vitamin A effective reversing preneoplastic lesions in both humans and animals. To study its physiochemical properties and disposition kinetics, we developed a rapid, sensitive, and precise high-performance liquid chromatography assay for 13-CRA in biological samples. This assay system resulted in a clear separation of 13-CRA from all-trans-retinoic acid and retinol and had a detection limit of 20 ng/ml plasma. Recovery was 89 +/- 6% (S.D.) at equivalent physiological concentrations with a precision of 8%. To study the disposition kinetics in humans, 13 patients received a p.o. bolus of 13-CRA and had blood samples collected at timed intervals. For the 10 patients studied on the first day of 13-CRA administration, the mean time to peak plasma concentration was 222 +/- 102 min. Interpatient peak 13-CRA plasma concentrations were found to be variable, suggesting irregular gastrointestinal absorption. Beta-Phase t 1/2 was approximately 25 hr. The prolonged terminal-phase plasma half-life may represent biliary excretion and enterohepatic circulation.

A substantial amount of data suggests that both RNA and DNA tumor viruses are associated with human cancer. Correction of malignant transformation at the genotypic level may be possible in the future but will require significant advances in our understanding of genomic material. The use of simple defined models such as tumor viruses seems like a reasonable place to start. The use of antipromotors (e.g. retinoids) and inhibitors of promotors will prove as important to the successful treatment of cancer in the next decade as chemotherapy has been in the last two decades.

We investigated the effect of the synthetic vitamin A derivative isotretinoin (13-cis-retinoic acid) on advanced cancers in 103 patients and on preneoplastic lesions in five patients. Six of 14 patients with squamous cell epithelial cancers had objective regressions of skin or subcutaneous metastases. Three of five patients with preneoplastic lesions had objective responses. The major dose-limiting toxic effects were reversible dermatitis, emotional lability, and headaches. We conclude that the growth of some squamous cell epithelial malignancies can be inhibited by isotretinoin and suggest that other retinoids should be evaluated as antitumor agents.

The number of cells within tumor colonies has not been determined accurately in prior reports because, in all but small clusters, cells grow too closely and stacked to allow direct counting of cells by inverted microscopy. Therefore, we stained colonies formed in agar from 38 tumor cell samples of diverse histological origin, removed them with a micropipet, and directly counted the number of cells. The number of cells within colonies increased geometrically with colony diameter and inversely with the size of the cells within the colonies. The relationship can be described using linear regression: [In(no. of cells/colony) = 0.87 - 2.80 In (colony cell diameter) + 2.38 In (colony diameter)] which gave an R2 of 0.92. Measurements of colonies in agar showed that they grew as oblate spheroids rather than spheroids. In an average sample, 60-micron-diameter colonies contained eight to 10 cells; the range for the 38 samples was 1.2 to 48.5. These results precisely define colonies in terms of cell number. They allow calculation of the total number of cells formed from clonogenic cells, a more complete estimate of proliferation than conventional cloning efficiencies which only measure initial proliferation. Furthermore, because of the dependence on the size of the colony cells, if colonies are defined only by a specific diameter then they do not contain similar numbers of cells. Calculations which assume spherical colonies, rather than the oblate spheroid shape we found, greatly overestimate the number of cells within colonies. Our data can increase the accuracy of quantitation in the clonogenic system and thus improve the interpretation of the proliferation of clonogenic tumor cells.

This paper presents the theoretical development of a model that predicts the conditions under which Hispanics will seek preventive health care. Research trends, however, show that Hispanics tend to delay preventive care, resulting in higher morbidity and mortality rates for serious diseases such as cancer. Since many serious diseases, such as heart disease, diabetes and cancer can be prevented or treated more effectively if detected early, it is crucial to understand the motivating forces behind Hispanics' preventive health behavior. The Hispanic model, which is an extension of the Health Behavior in Cancer Prevention Model developed by Atwood (1986), includes as core variables environmental barriers to access and English language proficiency, as well as social support, health beliefs, self-efficacy, or perceived skill, health locus of control, and health values. The practical health policy applications of the model are also discussed.

The potential for chemical intervention (chemoprevention) as a means of halting or delaying the process of carcinogenesis is assessed as a strategy for reducing the incidence of human cancer. The process of carcinogenesis is dissected into its constituent steps, thereby exposing sites for intervention. These sites are then critically discussed with regard to the existence of chemicals active at these sites using data gained from the laboratory and from epidemiological studies, intrinsic problems or advantages associated with intervention at specific sites in the carcinogenic process, and practical aspects of intervention in humans. The design and potential long-term positive and negative consequences of chemoprevention clinical trials are critically discussed, with the objective of exposing the major differences that exist between clinical trials in cancer chemoprevention and those in cancer chemotherapy. Results of completed prevention trials and details of ongoing trials are presented and discussed. Based on the laboratory, epidemiological, and clinical evidence presented, it is concluded that chemoprevention offers excellent prospects as a means of reducing cancer incidence. Among currently available agents, the retinoids possess the best combination of properties. However, much more research is needed to optimize drugs and protocols and to develop interim end points for assessing response. The authors finally caution that overambitious claims for the prospects for chemoprevention may lead to reduced emphasis on the need for changes in life-style (principally in smoking and diet) that are viewed as having the greatest potential for reducing cancer incidence.

We have applied an in vitro soft-agar tumor-colony assay (which is now applicable to a variety of human cancers) to measurement of in vitro sensitivity to drugs and prediction of clinical response to cancer chemotherapy. The assay predicts drug resistance with 96% accuracy and sensitivity (in healthy pretreated patients) with 62% accuracy. On a pharmacokinetic basis the zone in vitro sensitivity for any given drug was only 5%-10% of the clinical concentration-time product (Cxt) achievable. This suggests that intratumoral drug concentrations in vivo may be lower than those in the plasma, and/or that2 log kills of tumor stem cells (not measurable in the assay) are required for clinical response. Serial in vitro studies showed that acquisition of drug resistance is a common clinical phenomenon which can be directly detected and quantitated in vitro.

A phase II trial was conducted to determine the clinical activity of amsacrine (m-AMSA) in patients with heavily pretreated solid tumors, myeloma, and lymphoma at the University of Arizona Cancer Center. Additionally, m-AMSA was evaluated at other Southwest Oncology Group institutions in breast cancer, myeloma, melanoma, and oat cell cancer of the lung. At a dose of 120 mg/m2 given iv every 28 days, 12 partial responses were observed in 221 patients evaluable for response. Some antitumor activity was observed in breast cancer (four responses of 65 patients), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (three of nine), Hodgkin's disease (two of five), and sarcoma (two of 15). A partial response was also documented in one of two patients with cervical cancer. Among the 135 patients treated at the University of Arizona who were extensively evaluated for toxic effects, only myelosuppression and anemia were seen in a significant number of patients. At this dose and schedule, 29% of patients developed leukopenia of less than 3000 cells/mm3, 16% developed a thrombocytopenia of less than 100,000 cells/mm3, and 29% had an acute fall in hemoglobin of greater than or equal to 2 g/100 ml. In addition, two patients suffered grand mal seizures which were not clearly drug-related. These results suggest that further study of m-AMSA in lymphoma, sarcoma, and cervical cancer is warranted.