Search

Two decades after the genomics revolution, oncology is rapidly transforming into a genome-driven discipline, yet routine cancer diagnostics is still mainly microscopy based, except for tumor type-specific predictive molecular tests. Pathology laboratories struggle to quickly validate and adopt biomarkers identified by genomics studies of new targeted therapies. Consequently, clinical implementation of newly approved biomarkers suffers substantial delays, leading to unequal patient access to these therapies. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) can successfully address these challenges by providing a stable molecular diagnostic platform that allows detection of a multitude of genomic alterations in a single cost-efficient assay and facilitating rapid implementation, as well as by the development of new genomic biomarkers. Recently, the Whole-genome sequencing Implementation in standard Diagnostics for Every cancer patient (WIDE) study demonstrated that WGS is a feasible and clinically valid technique in routine clinical practice with a turnaround time of 11 workdays. As a result, WGS was successfully implemented at the Netherlands Cancer Institute as part of routine diagnostics in January 2021. The success of implementing WGS has relied on adhering to a comprehensive protocol including recording patient information, sample collection, shipment and storage logistics, sequencing data interpretation and reporting, integration into clinical decision-making and data usage. This protocol describes the use of fresh-frozen samples that are necessary for WGS but can be challenging to implement in pathology laboratories accustomed to using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples. In addition, the protocol outlines key considerations to guide uptake of WGS in routine clinical care in hospitals worldwide., (© 2023. Springer Nature Limited.)

The current increase in number and diversity of targeted anticancer agents poses challenges to the logistics and timeliness of molecular diagnostics (MolDx), resulting in underdiagnosis and treatment. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) may provide a sustainable solution for addressing current as well as future diagnostic challenges. The present study therefore aimed to prospectively assess feasibility, validity, and value of WGS in routine clinical practice. WGS was conducted independently of, and in parallel with, standard of care (SOC) diagnostics on routinely obtained tumor samples from 1,200 consecutive patients with metastatic cancer. Results from both tests were compared and discussed in a dedicated tumor board. From 1,200 patients, 1,302 samples were obtained, of which 1,216 contained tumor cells. WGS was successful in 70% (854/1,216) of samples with a median turnaround time of 11 days. Low tumor purity (<20%) was the main reason for not completing WGS. WGS identified 99.2% and SOC MolDx 99.7% of the total of 896 biomarkers found in genomic regions covered by both tests. Actionable biomarkers were found in 603/848 patients (71%). Of the 936 associated therapy options identified by WGS, 343 were identified with SOC MolDx (36.6%). Biomarker-based therapy was started in 147 patients. WGS revealed 49 not previously identified pathogenic germline variants. Fresh-frozen, instead of formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded, sample logistics were easily adopted as experienced by the professionals involved. WGS for patients with metastatic cancer is well feasible in routine clinical practice, successfully yielding comprehensive genomic profiling for the vast majority of patients. © 2022 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland., (© 2022 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.)

Interrogating the tumor genome in its entirety by whole-genome sequencing (WGS) offers an unprecedented insight into the biology and pathogenesis of cancer, with potential impact on diagnostics, prognostication and therapy selection. WGS is able to detect sequence as well as structural variants and thereby combines central domains of cytogenetics and molecular genetics. Given the potential of WGS in directing targeted therapeutics and clinical decision-making, we envision a gradual transition of the method from research to clinical routine. This review is one out of three within this issue aimed at facilitating this effort, by discussing in-depth analytical validation, clinical interpretation and clinical utility of WGS. The review highlights the requirements for implementing, validating and maintaining a clinical WGS pipeline to obtain high-quality patient-specific data in accordance with the local regulatory landscape. Every step of the WGS pipeline, which includes DNA extraction, library preparation, sequencing, bioinformatics analysis, and data storage, is considered with respect to its logistics, necessities, potential pitfalls, and the required quality management. WGS is likely to drive clinical diagnostics and patient care forward, if requirements and challenges of the technique are recognized and met., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Whole genome sequencing (WGS) using fresh-frozen tissue and matched blood samples from cancer patients may become the most complete genetic tumor test. With the increasing availability of small biopsies and the need to screen more number of biomarkers, the use of a single all-inclusive test is preferable over multiple consecutive assays. To meet high-quality diagnostics standards, we optimized and clinically validated WGS sample and data processing procedures, resulting in a technical success rate of 95.6% for fresh-frozen samples with sufficient (≥20%) tumor content. Independent validation of identified biomarkers against commonly used diagnostic assays showed a high sensitivity (recall; 98.5%) and precision (positive predictive value; 97.8%) for detection of somatic single-nucleotide variants and insertions and deletions (across 22 genes), and high concordance for detection of gene amplification (97.0%; EGFR and MET) as well as somatic complete loss (100%; CDKN2A/p16). Gene fusion analysis showed a concordance of 91.3% between DNA-based WGS and an orthogonal RNA-based gene fusion assay. Microsatellite (in)stability assessment showed a sensitivity of 100% with a precision of 94%, and virus detection (human papillomavirus), an accuracy of 100% compared with standard testing. In conclusion, whole genome sequencing has a >95% sensitivity and precision compared with routinely used DNA techniques in diagnostics, and all relevant mutation types can be detected reliably in a single assay., (Copyright © 2021 Association for Molecular Pathology and American Society for Investigative Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose : Predictive diagnostics play an increasingly important role in personalized medicine for cancer treatment. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS)-based treatment selection is expected to rapidly increase worldwide. This study aimed to calculate and compare the total cost of currently used diagnostic techniques and of WGS in treatment of non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), melanoma, colorectal cancer (CRC), and gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) in the Netherlands. Methods : The activity-based costing (ABC) method was conducted to calculate total cost of included diagnostic techniques based on data provided by Dutch pathology laboratories and the Dutch-centralized cancer WGS facility. Costs were allocated to four categories: capital costs, maintenance costs, software costs, and operational costs. Results : The total cost per cancer patient per technique varied from € 58 (Sanger sequencing, three amplicons) to € 2925 (paired tumor-normal WGS). The operational costs accounted for the vast majority (over 90%) of the total per cancer patient technique costs. Conclusion : This study outlined in detail all costing aspects and cost prices of current and new diagnostic modalities used in treatment of NSCLC, melanoma, CRC, and GIST in the Netherlands. Detailed cost differences and value comparisons between these diagnostic techniques enable future economic evaluations to support decision-making.

Background: 'Precision oncology' can ensure the best suitable treatment at the right time by tailoring treatment towards individual patient and comprehensive tumour characteristics. In current molecular pathology, diagnostic tests which are part of the standard of care (SOC) only cover a limited part of the spectrum of genomic changes, and often are performed in an iterative way. This occurs at the expense of valuable patient time, available tissue sample, and interferes with 'first time right' treatment decisions. Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) captures a near complete view of genomic characteristics of a tumour in a single test. Moreover, WGS facilitates faster implementation of new treatment relevant biomarkers. At present, WGS mainly has been applied in study settings, but its performance in a routine diagnostic setting remains to be evaluated. The WIDE study aims to investigate the feasibility and validity of WGS-based diagnostics in clinical practice., Methods: 1200 consecutive patients in a single comprehensive cancer centre with (suspicion of) a metastasized solid tumour will be enrolled with the intention to analyse tumour tissue with WGS, in parallel to SOC diagnostics. Primary endpoints are (1) feasibility of implementation of WGS-based diagnostics into routine clinical care and (2) clinical validation of WGS by comparing identification of treatment-relevant variants between WGS and SOC molecular diagnostics. Secondary endpoints entail (1) added clinical value in terms of additional treatment options and (2) cost-effectiveness of WGS compared to SOC diagnostics through a Health Technology Assessment (HTA) analysis. Furthermore, the (3) perceived impact of WGS-based diagnostics on clinical decision making will be evaluated through questionnaires. The number of patients included in (experimental) therapies initiated based on SOC or WGS diagnostics will be reported with at least 3 months follow-up. The clinical efficacy is beyond the scope of WIDE. Key performance indicators will be evaluated after every 200 patients enrolled, and procedures optimized accordingly, to continuously improve the diagnostic performance of WGS in a routine clinical setting., Discussion: WIDE will yield the optimal conditions under which WGS can be implemented in a routine molecular diagnostics setting and establish the position of WGS compared to SOC diagnostics in routine clinical care.

Metastatic cancer is a major cause of death and is associated with poor treatment efficacy. A better understanding of the characteristics of late-stage cancer is required to help adapt personalized treatments, reduce overtreatment and improve outcomes. Here we describe the largest, to our knowledge, pan-cancer study of metastatic solid tumour genomes, including whole-genome sequencing data for 2,520 pairs of tumour and normal tissue, analysed at median depths of 106× and 38×, respectively, and surveying more than 70 million somatic variants. The characteristic mutations of metastatic lesions varied widely, with mutations that reflect those of the primary tumour types, and with high rates of whole-genome duplication events (56%). Individual metastatic lesions were relatively homogeneous, with the vast majority (96%) of driver mutations being clonal and up to 80% of tumour-suppressor genes being inactivated bi-allelically by different mutational mechanisms. Although metastatic tumour genomes showed similar mutational landscape and driver genes to primary tumours, we find characteristics that could contribute to responsiveness to therapy or resistance in individual patients. We implement an approach for the review of clinically relevant associations and their potential for actionability. For 62% of patients, we identify genetic variants that may be used to stratify patients towards therapies that either have been approved or are in clinical trials. This demonstrates the importance of comprehensive genomic tumour profiling for precision medicine in cancer.

Background: Oral administration of irinotecan (CPT-11) should allow sustained exposure to the drug without the inconvenience of intravenous delivery and with fewer side-effects., Patients and Methods: The present phase I trial of CPT-11, administered orally as a powder-filled capsule for 5 consecutive days every 3 weeks at doses ranging from 30 to 90 mg/m(2)/day, was conducted in 47 patients for whom a satisfactory standard treatment option was no longer available (24 males/23 females; median age 51 years, range 26-85). Tumour types included melanoma (11), colorectal (4), urinary tract (3), lung/pleura (4), thyroid (3), liver (3), gallbladder (2), cervix/uterus (3), breast (2), pancreas (2), carcinoma and other cancer types (10)., Results: A total of 171 cycles were administered (median 3, range 1-11). Dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) occurred during the first cycle in five of 31 patients in the dose-escalation part of the study: one patient at the 50 mg/m(2)/day dose level (diarrhoea grade 4); one patient at the 80 mg/m(2)/day dose level (prolonged neutropenia grade 4 and diarrhoea grade 3); and three patients at the 90 mg/m(2)/day dose level (diarrhoea, vomiting and neutropenia). The 80 mg/m(2)/day dose level was expanded, as a feasibility study, to include 16 additional patients, five of whom had received extensive prior pelvic irradiation. A further three patients in this cohort experienced DLTs, two of whom had received extensive prior pelvic irradiation. One patient died on study day 15 during the first cycle of oral CPT-11 following grade 3 diarrhoea, febrile neutropenia and a necrotic enterocolitis. Overall the grade 3/4 toxicities in 47 patients were asthenia (19%), anorexia (17%), neutropenia (14.9 %), diarrhoea (13%), nausea (12.7%), vomiting (8.5%) and thrombocytopenia (8.5%). Partial responses were observed in two melanoma patients and disease stabilisation was noted in 17 (36.1%) patients. Pharmacokinetic parameters were recorded for 46 patients., Conclusions: At the maximum tolerated dose, defined as 80 mg/m(2)/day for 5 days every 3 weeks, oral CPT-11 was shown to be well tolerated and safe with few of the haematological toxicities associated with the intravenous formulation.

Our objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of two administration sequences of docetaxel and gemcitabine in cancer patients, and to describe the pharmacokinetics of both drugs. Patients were treated in a 4-weekly schedule at two dose levels: gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15, and docetaxel 85 or 100 mg/m2 on day 15 (levels I and II). The protocol was amended to a 3-weekly schedule, testing gemcitabine 800 or 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, with docetaxel 85 mg/m2 on day 8 given initially (dose levels IIIa and IV). At the recommended dose, an extra cohort of patients initially received gemcitabine (dose level IIIb). Eleven patients were treated with the 4-week schedule; 29% of cycles were delayed predominantly because of hematological toxicity. Four patients developed dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), predominantly hematological. In the 3-week schedule, 14 patients were treated. At level IV, three of four patients developed DLTs, defining the MTD. With the reverse sequence, three patients received a total of 10 cycles. Overall, nine partial remissions were observed. We conclude the recommended dose for phase II studies is gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, combined with docetaxel 85 mg/m2 on day 8, on a 3-weekly schedule. Gemcitabine distribution is significantly altered upon docetaxel administration.

Purpose: To estimate the concentration of 5-fluorocytosine (5-FC), necessary for conversion to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in tumours transduced with the gene cytosine deaminase (CD), to achieve clinically significant radiosensitization to radiotherapy., Materials and Methods: Starting with a tumour control probability (TCP) of 37% from radiotherapy of 66 Gy in 2 Gy fractions, estimates were made of increase in TCP expected from sensitizer enhancement ratios (SER) of 1.1, 1.2, etc. SER values for 5-FU were obtained from a literature review. Clinical toxicity of 5-FC is also reviewed., Results: 5-FU has been reported to be an effective radiosensitizer if maintained for several days after each irradiation at concentrations of 0.6-0.9 microg/ml in surrounding medium. 5-FC is well tolerated by patients at concentrations of 25-100 microg/ml (average 60 microg/ml) for 6 weeks in standard antifungal treatment. Sufficient 5-FU should be available if conversion efficiency from 5-FC is 1-3%. SER values of 1.1 to 1.2 should be achievable with daily 2 Gy fractions. In vitro and xenograft experiments are reviewed and they do not contradict the conclusions., Conclusions: Increases in tumour control of 20 to 40% can be expected, which should be detectable in a 2-arm randomized trial of 260 (for 20%) or 60 (for 40%) patients.

Background: Serum VEGF levels are elevated in cancer patients and are used as a tumor marker in different malignancies. We have measured VEGF levels in different blood compartments in cancer patients and healthy volunteers in order to assess the most suitable way of processing blood for measuring VEGF as a marker of tumor-angiogenesis., Patients and Methods: VEGF concentrations were analyzed by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in serum (VEGFS), EDTA plasma (VEGFEDTA), citrated plasma (VEGFC), CTAD-plasma (VEGFCTAD), platelet poor plasma (VEGFPPP), platelet rich plasma after induction of platelet activation (VEGFPRP). Platelet activation was assessed by measuring PF4 concentrations in different plasma samples., Results: We observed higher VEGFS (P = 0.0027), VEGFEDTA (P = 0.003) and VEGFPPP (P = 0.0007) levels in cancer patients than in volunteers; VEGFPRP concentrations showed no significant difference (P = 0.208). Analysis of the correlation between VEGFplt and VEGFS in cancer patients showed a similar correlation in a comparable VEGFS concentration range as in the volunteers. When comparing VEGFC to VEGFCTAD, we find significantly higher VEGF and PF4 levels in citrated plasma (VEGF: P = 0.00019; PF4: P = 0.00023)., Conclusions: It is likely that VEGFS in cancer patients encompass platelet-delivered VEGF and VEGF from other sources, notably from (neo)-angiogenesis in tumoral tissue. The best discrimination between volunteers and cancer patients was observed in PPP. As generating plasma can induce platelet activation, with consequent VEGF release from platelets, we suggest that to assess free circulating VEGF, CTAD plasma should be used.

KW-2149 is a new, semisynthetic, C-7-N-Substituted, mitomycin C analog showing antitumor activity both in vitro and in vivo, equal or superior to mitomycin C. In a phase I study, KW-2149 was administered as an i.v. bolus injection every 21 days and at a dose of 100 mg/m2 pulmonary toxicity was dose limiting. Animal studies have indicated since that KW-2149-induced pulmonary toxicity can be prevented by pretreatment with corticosteroids. This paper presents the results of a further phase I study of KW-2149 with corticosteroid pretreatment. Patients were treated with oral dexamethasone 8 mg every 12 h, starting 24 h before KW-2149 administration, for 5 days. KW-2149 was given as an i.v. bolus injection every 21 days. Seventeen patients were treated with a total of 48 courses. Six patients received 60 mg/m2 and 11 patients 75 mg/m2. Two courses were not evaluable for toxicity. Significant lung toxicity was observed in at least three patients treated with a dose of 75 mg/m2 KW-2149 and pulmonary toxicity was therefore considered the dose-limiting toxicity at 75 mg/m2. No other important side effects were noted. One partial response was observed in a patient with colorectal cancer. Pretreatment with dexamethasone failed to suppress KW-2149-induced lung toxicity.

Aims: Oral administration of 5-fluorouracil (FUra), an important cytotoxic agent, is limited by a wide variation in bioavailability. 5'-deoxy-5-fluorouridine (dFUrd), a masked form of FUra, has shown promise clinically when given intravenously or orally as a solution or tablet. This study investigates the efficacy of an oral capsule formulation of dFUrd in generating continuous systemic levels of this compound in cancer patients., Methods: Six patients with advanced intestinal or ovarian malignancies were given three cycles of dFUrd, days 1-5, at intervals of 4 weeks. The doses of dFUrd were 600 mg m-2 three times daily, 800 mg m-2 three times daily, and 1000 mg m-2 three times daily, on cycles one, two and three, respectively (total dose 36 g m-2 ). The initial dose in each cycle was given as a slow intravenous injection over 10 min, and the remainder orally. Plasma and urine levels of dFUrd and two of its metabolites, FUra and 5,6-dihydro-5-fluorouracil (FUraH2 ), were monitored in six patients at each dose level., Results: All six patients completed the study, receiving three different doses over a 3 month period, following which one had achieved a partial response, one had stable disease, and four had developed progressive disease. Side-effects were negligible, and only two instances of transient diarrhoea WHO grade 1 were seen. Total body clearance (CLtot) of intravenous dFUrd decreased with increasing dose; 2.7, 2.0 and 1.3 l min-1 m-2, following doses of 600, 800 and 1000 mg m-2, respectively. The mean elimination half-life of intravenous dFUrd increased with the dose from 15 to 22 min. Oral dFUrd was rapidly absorbed with a lag time of less than 20 min. The mean elimination half-life (t1/2, z ) of oral dFUrd was 32-45 min in the dose range 600-1000 mg m-2. The AUC of FUra and FUraH2 increased overproportionally with increasing intravenous doses of dFUrd. The mean systemic bioavailability of oral dFUrd was 34-47%., Conclusions: dFUrd, which selectively releases the antimetabolite FUra in tumour cells, can be given orally at doses of 600-1000 mg m-2 three times daily for 5 days. The systemic levels achieved are equivalent to those seen following continuous infusions of dFUrd or FUra. Toxicity is tolerable, and further clinical investigation of oral dFUrd is warranted.

Docetaxel is a new antimicrotubule agent that has been shown to be active against a variety of solid tumors. Ifosfamide is an alkylating drug that has demonstrated activity against non-small cell lung cancer, testicular cancer, breast cancer, and soft tissue sarcoma. This phase I study of the combination of these drugs was performed to assess the feasibility of using the two agents together, to determine the maximum tolerated dose and the side effects, and to propose a safe schedule for further phase II studies. Thirty-four patients with histologically confirmed solid tumors who had not been treated previously with taxanes or ifosfamide and who had received no more than one line of chemotherapy for advanced disease were entered into the study. Treatment consisted of docetaxel given as a 1-hour infusion followed by ifosfamide as a 24-hour infusion (schedule A), or ifosfamide followed by docetaxel (schedule B) every 3 weeks. Docetaxel doses ranged from 60 to 85 mg/m2 and ifosfamide doses from 2.5 to 5.0 g/m2. Grades 3 and 4 granulocytopenia were observed in 89% of courses and appeared to be of short duration and related to the ifosfamide dose. Febrile neutropenia and sepsis occurred in 17% and 2% of courses, respectively. Severe anemia and thrombocytopenia were uncommon. Nonhematologic toxicities were mild to moderate, and included alopecia, nausea, vomiting, mucositis, diarrhea, sensory neuropathy, skin and nail toxicity, hypersensitivity reactions, and edema. Schedule B appeared to induce more gastrointestinal toxicity than schedule A. One complete response in soft tissue sarcoma and two partial responses, one in cancer of unknown primary and the other in non-small cell lung cancer, were documented. The dose-limiting toxicity for schedule A was neutropenic fever at a dose of 85 mg/m2 docetaxel and 5 g/m2 ifosfamide. The dose-limiting toxicity for schedule B was neutropenic fever at a dose of 75 mg/m2 docetaxel and 4 g/m2 ifosfamide. A dose of 75 mg/m2 docetaxel combined with 5 g/m2 ifosfamide according to schedule A can be recommended for further studies.

Docetaxel and ifosfamide have shown significant activity against a variety of solid tumours. This prompted a phase I trial on the combination of these drugs. This phase I study was performed to assess the feasibility of the combination, to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the side effects, and to propose a safe schedule for further phase II studies. A total of 34 patients with a histologically confirmed solid tumour, who were not pretreated with taxanes or ifosfamide and who had received no more than one line of chemotherapy for advanced disease were entered into the study. Treatment consisted of docetaxel given as a 1-h infusion followed by ifosfamide as a 24-h infusion (schedule A), or ifosfamide followed by docetaxel (schedule B) every 3 weeks. Docetaxel doses ranged from 60 to 85 mg m(-2) and ifosfamide doses from 2.5 to 5.0 g m(-2). Granulocytopenia grade 3 and 4 were common (89%), short lasting and ifosfamide dose dependent. Febrile neutropenia and sepsis occurred in 17% and 2% of courses respectively. Non-haematological toxicities were mild to moderate and included alopecia, nausea, vomiting, mucositis, diarrhoea, sensory neuropathy, skin and nail toxicity and oedema. There did not appear to be any pharmacokinetic interaction between docetaxel and ifosfamide. One complete response (CR) (soft tissue sarcoma) and two partial responses (PRs) were documented. A dose of 75 mg m(-2) of docetaxel combined with 5.0 g m(-2) ifosfamide appeared to be manageable. Schedule A was advocated for further treatment.

KW-2149 is a new, semisynthetic, C-7-N-substituted, mitomycin C (MMC) analog showing equal or superior antitumor activity in both in vitro and in vivo assays. The preclinical activity profile combined with the hematological toxicity data in rodents and the water solubility of the compound compare favorably with MMC. The aim of this phase I study was to determine the toxicity profile and the optimal dosage of KW-2149. In this phase I study 37 patients received 97 courses of KW-2149 administered as an i.v. bolus injection every 21 days at sequential dose levels: 5, 10, 17, 25, 35, 47, 60, 75, 90 and 100 mg/m2. Hematological toxicity was moderate even at the 100 mg/m2 dose level. Grade IV leucopenia and thrombocytopenia were observed in one of three patients at the 100 mg/m2 dose level. There was some evidence of a delayed-type bone marrow toxicity. Pulmonary toxicity was dose limiting, with grade III toxicity occurring in all three patients treated at a dose of 100 mg/m2. The type of lung toxicity was similar to the one observed with other antitumor antibiotics. No renal or cardiac toxicity was observed. Other toxicities were generally mild. Antitumor activity was observed in four patients. Data of drug monitoring demonstrated rapid metabolism and/or distribution of KW-2149 with a short half-life and the emergence of the cytotoxic metabolites M-16 and M-18. The dose-limiting toxicity of KW-2149 is pulmonary toxicity.

A method is described for the determination of the antitumour drug cyclophosphamide and six stable metabolites in plasma of cancer patients, namely dechloroethyl-cyclophosphamide, 4-keto-cyclophosphamide, carboxy-phosphamide, alcophosphamide, nor-nitrogen mustard and the N-chloroethyl-1,3-oxazolidine-2-one, as methyl and/or trifluoroacetyl derivatives by single ion monitoring gas chromatography/mass spectrometry, mostly in the electron capture chemical ionization mode. The isolation of most metabolites was performed by solid-phase C-18 extraction in weakly acidic medium. The phosphoramide mustard isolated under these conditions decomposes readily to the nor-nitrogen mustard during derivatization. The original nor-nitrogen mustard and the chloroethyl-1,3-oxazolidine-2-one were isolated by liquid extraction with ethyl acetate in alkaline medium. Recoveries of 75-99% were measured using spiked blank plasma samples. Quantitation of metabolites in patient plasma samples was performed using two sets of calibration curves for the concentration ranges of 1-100 ng and 0.1-10 micrograms of metabolite per millilitre of original plasma.

The thymidine analogue (E)-5-(2-bromovinyl)-2'-deoxyuridine (BVdUrd), which is an antiviral agent effective against herpes simplex virus type 1 and varicella zoster virus, has also proved to be a potent inhibitor of dihydrouracil dehydrogenase, the major degrading enzyme of the anticancer drug fluorouracil (FUra). To evaluate the effect of BVdUrd on the pharmacokinetics of FUra in cancer patients, BVdUrd was administered orally at a daily dose of 250 mg (five patients) or 3 x 250 mg (five patients). FUra was infused at doses of 110-400 mg over 10 min. Blood and urine samples were collected regularly during a period of up to 50 h. BVdUrd was rapidly absorbed, peak plasma levels of 0.6-7.1 micrograms/ml being achieved after 1-2 h. Following a rapid decline, plasma BVdUrd levels remained higher than 10 ng/ml for up to 2 days after BVdUrd administration. The total body clearance of FUra was approximately 61/h and t1/2 markedly increased to 4-7 h. The mean urinary excretion of FUra was 50%. No differences in FUra kinetics were observed between patients receiving one or three oral doses of BVdUrd. We conclude that the concomitant use and subsequent interaction of FUra and the antiviral agent BVdUrd resulted in an impressive inhibition of FUra breakdown and marked increase of renal clearance. The findings indicate that the simultaneous use of FUra and drugs resembling this antiviral agent in patients may result in unexpected toxicity. Further experience with BVdUrd and new analogues might enable the development of new FUra treatment schedules and treatment designs e.g. combinations with leucovorin.

Several in vivo methods have been assessed for their capacity to predict sensitivity for anticancer agents in humans. Standard strategies have been developed for screening purposes. Adjustments of these strategies are frequently suggested in reports in which the correlation between assay results and clinical therapeutic efficacy is analysed. Low predictivity and high costs of these assays are important reasons for changing the screening strategy. In vivo methods which predict the clinical response in the individual patient, are under investigation. Only the results of the subrenal capsule assay (in normal mice) have been correlated with the clinical response in a larger study. The criticism of the method and the low predictivity for sensitivity in a prospective study provide no reason for optimism. Methods which study changes predicting the clinical response in patients are still in a developmental phase.