Search

The expanding number of specialized oncology therapeutics available in veterinary oncology can make staying updated on the most recent advances challenging. This article summarizes the mechanism of action, available supporting data, and clinical use of three key veterinary cancer/supportive care therapeutics: Laverdia-CA1, Canalevia-CA1, and Stelfonta. This information will help guide clinical use within your practice and can be incorporated into discussions with clients regarding the newest available options for their dogs with cancer., Competing Interests: Disclosure C. Mullin: No disclosures to report. C.A. Clifford: Speaker, advisory board member and consultant with Jaguar Animal Health and Anivive. C.M. Johannes: Speaker, advisory board member and consultant with QBiotics Group; advisory board member with Jaguar Animal Health., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

One of the primary objectives of the Oncology Pathology Working Group (OPWG) is for oncologists and pathologists to collaboratively generate consensus documents to standardize aspects of and provide guidelines for veterinary oncologic pathology. Consensus is established through review of relevant peer-reviewed literature relative to a subgroup's particular focus. In this article, the authors provide a critical review of the current literature for the diagnosis of, and histopathologic prognostication for, canine cutaneous and oral/lip melanocytic neoplasms, suggest guidelines for reporting, provide recommendations for clinical interpretation, and discuss future directions. This document represents the opinions of the working group and the authors and does not constitute a formal endorsement by the American College of Veterinary Pathologists, American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine or the Veterinary Cancer Society., (© 2022 The Authors. Veterinary and Comparative Oncology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

One of the primary objectives of the Oncology Pathology Working Group (OPWG), a joint initiative of the Veterinary Cancer Society and the American College of Veterinary Pathologists, is for oncologists and pathologists to collaboratively generate consensus documents to standardize aspects and provide guidelines for oncologic pathology. Consensus is established through review of relevant peer-reviewed literature relative to a subgroup's particular focus. In this article, the authors provide a critical review of the current literature for grading of canine cutaneous mast cell tumors, suggest guidelines for reporting, and provide recommendations for its clinical interpretation. The article mainly focuses on histologic grading, but relevant information on mitotic count and cytological grading are also discussed. This document represents the opinions of the working group and the authors but does not constitute a formal endorsement by the American College of Veterinary Pathologists or the Veterinary Cancer Society.

The term bland arterial embolization refers to catheter-directed delivery of particulate material for the purpose of embolizing selected arteries. This technique is used in humans to treat a number of conditions, including arteriovenous malformations, uterine fibroids, and epistaxis. The term chemoembolization refers to selective intra-arterial delivery of chemotherapeutic agents in conjunction with particulate material for the purpose of embolizing arteries supplying blood to a tumor. Compared with traditional modes of drug delivery, chemoembolization increases local concentration and dwell time of the chemotherapeutic agent, augments tumor ischemia, and minimizes systemic toxic effects. In humans, the technique has shown encouraging results in the treatment of a variety of nonresectable tumors. The present report describes techniques for percutaneous bland arterial embolization and chemoembolization in dogs and goats and results of these techniques in 3 dogs and a goat. Bland arterial embolization was performed in 2 dogs and the goat. The goals of treatment included pain palliation, reduction of tumor growth, and control of hemorrhage, and each animal was considered to have benefited from the procedure on the basis of the preprocedural goals. Chemoembolization was performed in 1 dog for treatment of a nonresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Unfortunately, this dog did not live long enough to identify any response to treatment. Results for animals studied illustrate the feasibility of bland arterial embolization and chemoembolization in veterinary patients and suggest that embolization may provide an alternative method of treatment for animals with inoperable lesions.