Search

Difpad-Onco (nursing screening of the frailty of elderly people, at home, with oncological disease) aims to facilitate and complement the identification of frailties in elderly cancer patients by private practice nurses in the patient's home. It consists of the G8 Oncodage, a Mini-Cog screening for cognitive impairment, a history of falls, and social frailty. It is aimed at all cancer patients aged 70 and over. Around 80% of patients assessed have a G8 score ≤ 14/17, indicating geriatric frailty, and over 60% have more than one frailty (social, dietary, cognitive, falls). The DIFPAD-Onco project represents an innovative experiment in care pathways for elderly cancer patients., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Purpose: This review systematically investigates the role of radiomics in radiotherapy, with a particular emphasis on the use of quantitative imaging biomarkers for predicting clinical outcomes, assessing toxicity, and optimizing treatment planning. While the review encompasses various applications of radiomics in radiotherapy, it particularly highlights its potential for guiding reirradiation of recurrent cancers., Methods: A systematic review was conducted based on a Medline search with the search engine PubMed using the keywords "radiomics or radiomic" and "radiotherapy or reirradiation". Out of 189 abstracts reviewed, 147 original articles were included in the analysis. These studies were categorized by tumor localization, imaging modality, study objectives, and performance metrics, with a particular emphasis on the inclusion of external validation and adherence to a standardized radiomics pipeline., Results: The review identified 14 tumor localizations, with the majority of studies focusing on lung (33 studies), head and neck (27 studies), and brain (15 studies) cancers. CT was the most frequently employed imaging modality (77 studies) for radiomics, followed by MRI (46 studies) and PET (13 studies). The overall AUC across all studies, primarily focused on predicting the risk of recurrence (94 studies) or toxicity (41 studies), was 0.80 (SD=0.08). However, only 24 studies (16.3%) included external validation, with a slightly lower AUC compared to those without it. For studies using CT versus MRI or PET, both had a median AUC of 0.79, with IQRs of 0.73-0.86 for CT and 0.76-0.855 for MRI/PET, showing no significant differences in performance. Five studies involving reirradiation reported a median AUC of 0.81 (IQR: 0.73-0.825)., Conclusion: Radiomics demonstrates considerable potential in personalizing radiotherapy by improving treatment precision through better outcome prediction and treatment planning. However, its clinical adoption is hindered by the lack of external validation and variability in study designs. Future research should focus on implementing rigorous validation methods and standardizing imaging protocols to enhance the reliability and generalizability of radiomics in clinical radiotherapy, with particular attention to its application in reirradiation., (Copyright © 2024 Société française de radiothérapie oncologique (SFRO). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Childhood cancer survivors, in particular those treated with radiation therapy, are at high risk of long-term iatrogenic events. The prediction of risk of such events is mainly based on the knowledge of the radiation dose received to healthy organs and tissues during treatment of childhood cancer diagnosed decades ago. We aimed to set up a standardized organ dose table to help former patients and clinicians in charge of long-term follow-up clinics., Methods and Materials: We performed whole body dosimetric reconstruction for 2646 patients from 12 European countries treated between 1941 and 2006 (median, 1976). Most plannings were 2- or 3-dimensional. A total of 46% of patients were treated using Cobalt 60, and 41%, using a linear accelerator. The median prescribed dose was 27.2 Gy (IQ1-IQ3, 17.6-40.0 Gy). A patient-specific voxel-based anthropomorphic phantom with more than 200 anatomic structures or substructures delineated as a surrogate of each subject's anatomy was used. The radiation therapy was simulated with a treatment planning system based on available treatment information. The radiation dose received by any organ of the body was estimated by extending the treatment planning system dose calculation to the whole body, by type and localization of childhood cancer., Results: The integral dose and normal tissue doses to most of the 23 considered organs increased between the 1950s and 1970s and decreased or plateaued thereafter. Whatever the organ considered, the type of childhood cancer explained most of the variability in organ dose. The country of treatment explained only a small part of the variability., Conclusions: The detailed dose estimates provide very useful information for former patients or clinicians who have only limited knowledge about radiation therapy protocols or techniques, but who know the type and site of childhood cancer, sex, age, and year of treatment. This will allow better prediction of the long-term risk of iatrogenic events and better referral to long-term follow-up clinics., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: The impact of geographical accessibility on cancer survival has been investigated in few studies, with most research focusing on access to reference care centers, using overall mortality and limited to specific cancer sites. This study aims to examine the association of access to primary care with mortality in excess of patients with the 10 most frequent cancers in France, while controlling for socioeconomic deprivation., Methods: This study included a total of 151,984 cases diagnosed with the 10 most common cancer sites in 21 French cancer registries between 2013 and 2015. Access to primary care was estimated using two indexes: the Accessibilité Potentielle Localisée index (access to general practitioners) and the Scale index (access to a range of primary care clinicians). Mortality in excess was modelized using an additive framework based on expected mortality based on lifetables and observed mortality., Findings: Patients living in areas with less access to primary care had a greater mortality in excess for some very common cancer sites like breast (women), lung (men), liver (men and women), and colorectal cancer (men), representing 46% of patients diagnosed in our sample. The maximum effect was found for breast cancer; the excess hazard ratio was estimated to be 1.69 (95% CI, 1.20-2.38) 1 year after diagnosis and 2.26 (95% CI, 1.07-4.80) 5 years after diagnosis., Interpretation: This study revealed that this differential access to primary care was associated with mortality in excess for patients with cancer and should become a priority for health policymakers to reduce these inequalities in health care accessibility., (© 2024 American Cancer Society.)

Purpose: Cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) is under-addressed by healthcare professionals owing to a lack of clinical management guidelines. This European Delphi study proposes recommendations to healthcare professionals for the management of CRCI in patients with non-central nervous system (non-CNS) cancers., Methods: Twenty-two recommendations were developed based on a literature review and authors' clinical experience, split into three categories: screening, cognitive assessment, intervention. The survey included European professionals, experts in CRCI. The Delphi method was used: experts rated the clinical relevancy of recommendations on a 9-point Likert scale in three rounds. A recommendation was accepted if all votes were between 7 and 9. Recommendations not accepted in round 1 and round 2 were deleted, or modified and rated in round 3., Results: Eighteen professionals (psychologists, physicians, researchers) voted and accepted 15 recommendations. Experts recommended the systematic screening of CRCI, followed by a short objective cognitive assessment, if complaints screened. A comprehensive evaluation is recommended if CRCI persists 6 months post-treatment. Cognitive rehabilitation, physical activity, meditative-movement therapy, and multimodal intervention should be offered. Recommendations about frequency and duration of interventions, the professional to administer cognitive rehabilitation and the use of meditation and cognitive training without psychoeducation were not accepted., Conclusions: This survey provides 15 recommendations to assist healthcare professionals in detecting, assessing and offering interventions for CRCI., Implications for Cancer Survivors: These recommendations should be included in supportive care to help healthcare professionals to detect CRCI and propose the best available intervention for patients with cognitive complaints. Developing CRCI management in clinical settings would improve patients' quality of life., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Epidemiological data reveal that 45% of persons with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) in France are more than 50 years. This population more than 50 is more susceptible to cancer, and this risk may be increased by frequent use of immunosuppressive drugs. Consequently, concerns have arisen about the potential increased risk of cancer in PwMS and how patients should be screened and managed in terms of cancer risk., Objective: To develop evidence-based recommendations to manage the coexistence of cancer and multiple sclerosis (MS)., Methods: The French Group for Recommendations in MS collected articles from PubMed and university databases covering the period January 1975 through June 2022. The RAND/UCLA method was employed to achieve formal consensus. MS experts comprehensively reviewed the full-text articles and developed the initial recommendations. A group of multidisciplinary health care specialists then validated the final proposal., Results: Five key questions were addressed, encompassing various topics such as cancer screening before or after initiating a disease-modifying therapy (DMT), appropriate management of MS in the context of cancer, recommended follow-up for cancer in patients receiving a DMT, and the potential reintroduction of a DMT after initial cancer treatment. A strong consensus was reached for all 31 recommendations., Conclusion: These recommendations propose a strategic approach to managing cancer risk in PwMS., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: N. Collongues has received honoraria for consulting or presentation from Alexion, Biogen Idec, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Horizon Therapeutics, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, and Sanofi-Genzyme and is a member of the Editorial Board of the Journal de la Ligue Française contre la Sclérose en plaques and the Neurology and Therapy Journal. Françoise Durand-Dubief has received personal compensation for consulting, serving on a scientific advisory board, speaking, or other activities from Biogen, BMS-Celgene, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, and Teva. Christine Lebrun Frenay has nothing to disclose. Géraldine Androdias has received personal compensation for consulting, serving on a scientific advisory board, speaking, or other activities from Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, and Sanofi-Genzyme. Bertrand Audoin has nothing to disclose. Xavier Ayrignac has received consulting fees and lecturing fess, travel grants, and unconditional research support from Alexion, Biogen, Genzyme, Janssen, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Aventis, and Teva Pharma. Caroline Bensa has received consulting honoraria from Alexion, Sanofi, Merck, Biogen, BMS, and Novartis. Kevin Bigaut has received lecturing fees and travel grants from Biogen, Celgene-BMS, Novartis, Roche, and Sanofi-Genzyme. Julie Boucher has nothing to disclose. Bertrand Bourre serves on the scientific advisory board and has received funding for travel and honoraria from Alexion, Biogen, BMS, Horizon, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi, and Roche. Clemence Boutiere has nothing to disclose. Pierre Branger has received personal compensation for consulting, serving on a scientific advisory board, speaking, or other activities from Alexion, Biogen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, Novartis, and Sanofi-Genzyme. C. Carra-Dalliere has received travel grants and/or consulting fees from Alexion, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, and Sanofi-Genzyme. Jonathan Ciron has received personal compensation for consulting, serving on a scientific advisory board, speaking, or other activities from Biogen, Novartis, Merck, Sanofi, Roche, Celgene-BMS, Alexion, and Horizon Therapeutics. Angelique Da Silva has received personal fees from Daichi and Leopharma. Gilles Defer has received personal fees from Biogen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Serono, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, and Teva Pharmaceuticals. Sarah Demortière has nothing to disclose. Maxime Guillaume has received honoraria from Novartis, Merck, and Sanofi. Benjamin Hebant has nothing to disclose. Edouard Januel has nothing to disclose. Anne Kerbrat has nothing to disclose. Arnaud Kwiatkowski has received personal compensation for consulting, serving on a scientific advisory board, speaking, or other activities from Biogen, Merck Serono, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Roche, and Teva. Emmanuelle Leray has received personal compensation for consulting, serving on a scientific advisory board, speaking, or other activities with Alexion, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, and Sanofi-Genzyme. Elisabeth Maillart has received research support from Biogen and personal fees for lectures and serving on advisory boards from Biogen, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, and Teva. Guillaume Mathey has nothing to disclose. Xavier Moisset has received financial support from Allergan-Abbvie, Biogen, BMS, Grünenthal, Lilly, Lundbeck, Teva, Merck Serono, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Sanofi-Genzyme and non-financial support from SOS Oxygène not related to the submitted work. Alexis Montcuquet has received personal compensation for consulting, serving on a scientific advisory board, speaking, or other activities from Alexison, Biogen, Merck Serono, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Roche, and Teva. Nathalie Morel has nothing to disclose. Romain Marignier has received personal fees from Horizon Therapeutics, Alexion, Roche, and UCB; and nonfinancial support from Horizon Therapeutics, Merck, Biogen, and Roche. Chloe Pierret has nothing to disclose. Julie Pique has received travel grants and personal compensation for consulting, serving on a scientific advisory board, speaking, or other activities from Teva, Biogen, Novartis, Merck, Sanofi-Genzyme, Roche, Celgene-BMS, and Alexion. Julien Poupart has nothing to disclose. Chloe Prunis has nothing to disclose. Eric Thouvenot has received personal fees from Actelion and Teva and grants from Biogen, Merck Serono, Novartis, and Roche. Thomas Roux has received personal compensation for consulting, speaking, or serving on a scientific advisory board from Alexion, Biogen, BMS-Celgene, Merck, Novartis, and Sanofi-Genzyme. Perrine Schmitt has nothing to disclose. Helene Zephir has nothing to disclose. Mikael Cohen has received personal compensation for consulting, serving on a scientific advisory board, speaking, or other activities from Ad Scientiam, Biogen, Merck, Sanofi-Genzyme, Roche, Celgene-BMS, Alexion, and Horizon Therapeutics.

Research Question: What are current practices of post-treatment fertility preservation in male childhood cancer survivors (CCS) who have not benefitted from pre-therapeutic fertility preservation in France and other European countries?, Design: A survey was conducted of all fertility preservation centres in France (n = 30) and European fertility specialists (n = 9) in five European countries. Eight clinical cases and 40 questions were included to assess the effect of age at diagnosis, type of treatment (alkylating-agents, orchidectomy, testicular radiotherapy) and sperm parameters on the probability of a post-treatment fertility preservation proposal. Demographic characteristics of the responding practitioner were also collected., Results: Post-treatment sperm cryopreservation was proposed by 100% of fertility specialists in cases of severe oligoasthenoteratozoospermia, 77-88% in cases of moderate oligoasthenoteratozoospermia and in 65-77% in cases of sperm motility and vitality impairment. In cases of normal sperm parameters, 27-54% of fertility specialists would propose post-treatment sperm cryopreservation. These results did not differ significantly according to the type of treatment received or to responder-related factors. Practices of European specialists were also guided by sperm parameter results; 44-67% of specialists responding that they would propose sperm cryopreservation in cases of moderate to severe sperm parameter alterations., Conclusion: Post-treatment semen analysis could be widely proposed to CCS who have not benefitted from pre-therapeutic fertility preservation. Post-treatment fertility preservation could be proposed in cases of persistent moderate to severe sperm parameter alterations. Guidelines would be important to homogenize practices and to encourage oncologists to refer CCS for fertility assessments., (Copyright © 2023 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Treatment summaries and a personalized survivorship care plans based on internationally approved, organ-specific follow-up care recommendations are essential in preserving the health and quality of life for cancer survivors. Cohorts made up of survivors of childhood cancer have made significant contributions to the understanding of early mortality, somatic late complications, and psychosocial outcomes among former patients. New treatment protocols are needed to enhance survival and reduce the potential risk and severity of late effects, and working with treatment databases is crucial in doing so., Construction and Content: In the GOCE (Grand Ouest Cancer de l'Enfant [Western Region Childhood Cancer]) network, in a participative approach, we developed the LOG-after medical tool, on which health data are registered and can be extracted for analysis. Its name emphasizes the tool's goal, referring to 'logiciel' (the French word for software) that focuses on the period "after" the acute phase. This tool is hosted on a certified health data server. Several interfaces have been developed that can be used depending on the user's profile. Here we present this innovative co-constructed tool that takes national aspects into account, including the results of the feasibility/satisfaction study and its perspective., Utility and Discussion: The database contains data relating to 2558 patients, with samples from 1702 of these (66.54%) being held in a tumor bank. The average year in which treatment started was 2015 (ranging from December 1967 to November 2022: 118 patients were treated before 2012 and registered retrospectively when seen in long-term follow-up consultations or for another cancer since November 2021). A short questionnaire was distributed to healthcare professionals using the tool (physicians and research associates or technicians, n = 14), of whom 11 answered and were all satisfied. Access to the patient interface is currently open to 124 former patients. This was initially offered to 30 former patients who were over 15 years old, affected by the disease within the last 5 years, and had agreed to test it. Their opinions were collected by their doctor by e-mail, telephone, or during a consultation in an open-ended question and a non-directive interview. All patients were satisfied with the tool, with interest in testing it in the long term. Some former patients found that the tool provided them with some ease of mind; one, for instance, commented: "I feel lighter. I allow myself to forget. I know I will get a notification when the time comes.", Conclusions: Freely available to all users, LOG-after: (1) provides help with determining personalized survivorship care plans for follow-up; (2) builds links with general practitioners; (3) empowers the patient; and (4) enables health data to be exported for analysis. Database URL for presentation: https://youtu.be/2Ga64iausJE., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have transformed the therapeutic landscape in oncology. However, ICI can induce uncommon life-threatening autoimmune T-cell-mediated myotoxicities, including myocarditis and myositis. The thymus plays a critical role in T cell maturation. Here we demonstrate that thymic alterations are associated with increased incidence and severity of ICI myotoxicities. First, using the international pharmacovigilance database VigiBase, the Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris-Sorbonne University data warehouse (Paris, France) and a meta-analysis of clinical trials, we show that ICI treatment of thymic epithelial tumors (TET, and particularly thymoma) was more frequently associated with ICI myotoxicities than other ICI-treated cancers. Second, in an international ICI myocarditis registry, we established that myocarditis occurred earlier after ICI initiation in patients with TET (including active or prior history of TET) compared to other cancers and was more severe in terms of life-threatening arrythmias and concurrent myositis, leading to respiratory muscle failure and death. Lastly, we show that presence of anti-acetylcholine-receptor antibodies (a biological proxy of thymic-associated autoimmunity) was more prevalent in patients with ICI myocarditis than in ICI-treated control patients. Altogether, our results highlight that thymic alterations are associated with incidence and seriousness of ICI myotoxicities. Clinico-radio-biological workup evaluating the thymus may help in predicting ICI myotoxicities., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.)

Objective: The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for obesity in childhood cancer survivors (CCSs)., Methods: The study included 3199 patients of the French Childhood Cancer Survivor Study cohort, with 303 patients with obesity who had returned the self-questionnaire. Analyses were adjusted for social deprivation index and sex., Results: CCSs were less likely to have obesity (9.5%; 95% CI: 8.5%-10.5%) than expected from the general French population rates (12.5%; p = 0.0001). Nevertheless, brain tumor survivors were significantly more likely to develop obesity than the general French population (p = 0.0001). Compared with patients who did not receive radiotherapy to the pituitary gland, those who received a dose >5 Gy had an increased risk of obesity: relative risk 1.9 (95% CI: 1.2-3.1), 2.5 (95% CI: 1.7-3.7), and 2.6 (95% CI: 1.6-4.3), respectively, for participants with 6 to 20 Gy, 20 to 40 Gy, and ≥40 Gy of radiation. Etoposide administration significantly increased the risk of obesity (relative risk 1.7; 95% CI: 1.1-2.6). High social deprivation index was also a risk factor, just like BMI at diagnosis., Conclusions: Long-term follow-up of CCSs should include weight follow-up during adulthood., (© 2023 The Obesity Society.)

Background: Hospitalization rates can be used as an indirect indicator of the burden and severity of adverse health outcomes in childhood cancer survivors (CCS). We aimed to determine the long-term risks of hospitalization related to renal and urinary diseases among 5-year CCS., Methods: The French Childhood Cancer Survivor Study cohort was linked with data from the French National Healthcare System database, which enabled the identification of hospitalizations related to renal or urinary diseases. Clinical and detailed treatment data were collected from medical records. Dose-volume histograms were estimated for all patients treated with radiotherapy. Standardized Hospitalization Ratios and absolute excess risks (AER) were calculated. Relative risks were estimated using Poisson regression., Results: A total of 5,498 survivors were followed for 42,118 person-years (PY). Survivors experience 2.9 times more renal hospitalizations than expected in the general population, with an AER of 21.2/10,000 PY. Exposing more than 10% of the kidneys' volume to at least 20 Gray increases the risk of being hospitalized for renal causes by 2.2 (95% confidence interval, 1.3-3.6). Nephrectomized survivors treated with high doses of ifosfamide (>60 g/m²) have an extremely high risk of hospitalization for renal causes. Patients with comorbidities have about a 3-fold higher risk, and nephrectomized patients a 2-fold higher risk of being hospitalized for renal causes compared with other subjects. In the case of hospitalization for urinary causes, treatment by anthracycline administration was found to be associated with an almost 2-fold higher risk of hospitalization compared with the general population., Conclusions: These results support the need for careful monitoring of long-term renal diseases in survivors who have undergone nephrectomy, those treated with high doses of radiation (≥20 Gy) even to small volumes of the kidneys, and those with predisposing risk factors., Impact: This study provides new evidence with potential impact on surveillance guidelines related to dose-volume indicators associated with renal toxicity., (©2023 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Introduction: Cancer-related cognitive decline (CRCD) is often reported by patients with non-central nervous system (non-CNS) cancers. Since it can affect by the patient's quality of life and can last for several years after cancer treatment, interventions seeking to alleviate this decline should be developed. Despite research studies on this topic, interventions for CRCD in clinical practice are scarce., Areas Covered: This narrative review provides the state of the art on non-pharmacological interventions for CRCD in patients with non-CNS cancers., Expert Opinion: Non-pharmacological interventions, such as cognitive, physical and mind-body interventions seem effective in reducing CRCD. Future research should not only evaluate the efficacy of interventions but also the barriers and facilitators affecting the implementation of interventions in clinical settings. In particular, the acceptability of the intervention, its feasibility, adherence and fidelity to the initial protocol should be evaluated. Agreement is also required regarding the length and intensity of the intervention. Moreover, future studies should compare the efficacy of interventions with active control groups, rather than using only a waitlist control group. Finally, multimodal interventions focused on the multidimensionality of CRCD and associated factors such as psychological factors, fatigue and quality of sleep would pave the way for more holistic forms of patient management.

Leveraging external control data, especially real-world data (RWD), has drawn particular attention in recent years for facilitating oncology clinical development and regulatory decision-making. Medical regulators have published guidance on accelerating the use of RWD and external controls. However, few systematic discussions have been conducted on external controls in cancer drug submissions and regulatory feedback. This study aimed to identify European oncology drug approvals using external control data to demonstrate clinical efficacy. We included 18 eligible submissions employing 24 external controls and then discussed the use of external control, data sources, analysis methods, and regulators' feedback. The external controls have been actively submitted to the European Medical Agency (EMA) recently. We found that 17 % of the EMA-approved cancer drugs in 2016-2021 used external controls, among which 37 % of the cases leveraged RWD. However, nearly one-third of the external controls were not considered supportive evidence by EMA due to limitations regarding heterogeneous patient populations, missing outcome assessment in RWD, and inappropriate statistical analysis. This study highlighted that proper use of external controls requires a careful assessment of clinical settings, data availability, and statistical methodology. For better use of external controls in oncology clinical trials, we recommend: prospective study designs to avoid selection bias, sufficient baseline data to ensure the comparability of study populations, consistent endpoint measurements to enable outcome comparison, robust statistical methodology for comparative analysis, and collaborative efforts of sponsors and regulators to establish regulatory frameworks., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: XW receives Ph.D. funding from Sanofi and Association Nationale de la Recherche et de la Technologie (ANRT). FD, RH, and CL are employees of Sanofi. The other authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Therapeutic advances in pediatric oncology have made it possible to increase the five-year survival rate of 80% for all types of cancer, giving the possibility of a growing number of children reaching adulthood. This increase in the survival rate is not without cost for the survivors. The most common complications are endocrinopathies and affect approximately 50% of children cured of cancer. Overall mortality increases significantly over time : 6,5% at 10 years (confidence interval [CI] at 95%, 6,2-6,9), 11,9% at 20 years (CI at 95%, 11,5-12,4), and 18,1% at 30 years (CI at 95%, 17,3-18,9). Premature mortality is essentially due to a recurrence of the initial cancer, while late mortality is attributable to the consequences of treatment. Compared to children cured of cancer, adolescents and young adults have a lower risk of death due to later exposure to cancer treatment : 4,8 (CI 95%, 4,4-5,1) against 6,8 (IC 95%, 6,2-7,4), respectively. The psychological and social impact of the experience of cancer and its treatment is in the middle of the discussion. It is strongly recommended that adults cured of cancer benefit from a personalized follow up, according to a global approach. This follow up should be interdisciplinary and should focus on the prevention and management of late effects through screening, education on treatment-related complications, and should encourage preventive lifestyle behaviors., (Copyright © 2022 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) is a common complication resulting from various vascular mechanisms related to cancer, antitumoral therapy and patient status, and is associated with a poor prognosis. Anticoagulants recommended for CAT treatment or prevention mainly include low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Regarding thromboprophylaxis, a situation for which LMWH is a preferred option due to a lower risk of hemorrhage especially in patients with unresected gastro-intestinal and genito-urinary malignancies, the identification of patients at risk is a major issue. For patients with established CAT, the main issue is the choice of the most appropriate anticoagulant therapy. Because of the convenience of oral formulation, DOACs are an attractive option, and their efficacy has been shown in randomized trials. However, such studies are limited by selection biases, which make the analyzed population not representative of the real-life setting, as for instance cancers associated with a high risk of hemorrhage, or antitumoral therapies (e.g., tyrosine kinase inhibitors) known to interact with DOACs and then modifying their bioavailability. Caution associated with DOAC use is highlighted by most updated guidelines that recommend a case-by-case-based approach. The aim of the present paper is to help the oncologists make the most appropriate decision regarding the choice of anticoagulant therapy in a context of thromboprophylaxis or established CAT management in a patient with a solid tumor. The main issues are addressed through key practical questions, the answers of which are based on the current guidelines and additional published data or expert opinions., (Copyright © 2022 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

People with cancer often experience psychological distress and in addition, the practice of oncology is one of the most stressful areas of medicine for health professionals. Mindfulness meditation has been used to alleviate stress-related symptoms. We therefore ran a pilot study to assess the feasibility of a mindfulness intervention involving cancer patients, health professionals, and third persons together, as part of a comprehensive project aiming to evaluate the added value of 'meditating together'. Following on from our quantitative analyses of the project, we investigated its qualitative aspects through focus groups to explore the perceptions of participants regarding their experience. Focus groups conducted in 7 patients, 7 health professionals, and 8 third persons after the intervention showed that 'meditating together' was generally appreciated, particularly by patients, who found it motivating and a way to relieve their feelings of loneliness in the face of illness. All participants reported better stress management. They also shared benefits and difficulties concerning the practice of meditation and the programme's modalities. In addition, they all stated that the programme should be lasting. The opinion of the patients (our target population) will be decisive in building an optimized programme that will suit them the best. In conclusion, the protocol and the qualitative findings of the present study validate the rationale for conducting a fully powered randomized trial to demonstrate the potential added value of shared meditation and how it improves well-being by promoting bridge-building between cancer patients, health professionals and others. Trial Registration : ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT04410185. Registered on June 1, 2020.

Background: The discovery of the importance of the immune system and its role in oncogenesis led to the development of immunotherapy, a treatment that represents a major advance in oncology management. Due to the recent nature of immunotherapy, little is known about its side effects and their impact on quality of life. To date, there is no published study that accurately assesses the impact of immunotherapy on cognition, mood and/or fatigue in patients treated for cancer, despite potential neurological toxicities. The purpose of this study is to prospectively assess the incidence of cognitive impairment and cognitive complaints among cancer patients naïve for immunotherapy without concomitant anti-cancer treatment., Methods: The Cog-Immuno trial is a multicentre longitudinal study addressing patients with cancer candidate to receive immunotherapy alone (n = 100). Immunotherapy treatment will include either anti-PD1/PDL1 or anti-CTLA4 monotherapy or combination therapy. Cognitive and quality of life assessment, electrocardiogram (ECG) and biological tests will be performed at baseline, thereafter 3, and 6 months after immunotherapy initiation. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients treated by immunotherapy who will experience a decline in cognitive performances or in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score within 3 months after inclusion. Secondary endpoints concern: anxiety, depression, fatigue, clinical characteristics, biological data and neurophysiological measures (heart rate variability and hemispheric lateralization). A pre-clinical study will be conducted in cancer bearing mice receiving checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) with the evaluation of cognitive functions and emotional reactivity, collection of blood samples and investigation of neurobiological mechanisms from brain slices., Discussion: Assessing and understanding the incidence and the severity of cognitive impairment and its impact on quality of life in cancer patients treated by immunotherapy is a major issue. The results of this study will provide information on the impact of these treatments on cognitive functions in order to help the physicians in the choice of the treatment., Trial Registration: NCT03599830, registered July 26, 2018., Protocol Version: Version 5.1 dated from 2020/10/02., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) has increasingly been identified over the last two decades in non-CNS system cancer patients. Across Europe, researchers have contributed to this effort by developing preclinical models, exploring underlying mechanisms and assessing cognitive and quality of life changes. The ultimate goal is to develop interventions to treat patients experiencing CRCI. To do so, new challenges need to be addressed requiring the implementation of multidisciplinary research groups. In this consensus paper, we summarize the state of the art in the field of CRCI combined with the future challenges and action plans in Europe. These challenges include data sharing/pooling, standardization of assessments as well as assessing additional biomarkers and neuroimaging investigations, notably through translational studies. We conclude this position paper with specific actions for Europe based on shared scientific expert opinion and stakeholders involved in the Innovative Partnership for Action Against Cancer, with a particular focus on cognitive intervention programs., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest None of the authors has conflict of interest related to the content of this paper., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Radiotherapy with protons (PT) is a standard treatment of ocular tumors. It achieves excellent tumor control, limited toxicities, and the preservation of important functional outcomes, such as vision. Although PT may appear as one homogenous technique, it can be performed using dedicated ocular passive scattering PT or, increasingly, Pencil Beam Scanning (PBS), both with various degrees of patient-oriented customization., Materaial and Methods: MEDICYC PT facility of Nice are detailed with respect to their technical, dosimetric, microdosimetric and radiobiological, patient and tumor-customization process of PT planning and delivery that are key. 6684 patients have been treated for ocular tumors (1991-2020). Machine characteristics (accelerator, beam line, beam monitoring) allow efficient proton extraction, high dose rate, sharp lateral and distal penumbrae, and limited stray radiation in comparison to beam energy reduction and subsequent straggling with high-energy PBS PT. Patient preparation before PT includes customized setup and image-guidance, CT-based planning, and ocular PT software modelling of the patient eye with integration of beam modifiers. Clinical reports have shown excellent tumor control rates (∼95%), vision preservation and limited toxicity rates (papillopathy, retinopathy, neovascular glaucoma, dry eye, madarosis, cataract)., Results: Although demanding, dedicated ocular PT has proven its efficiency in achieving excellent tumor control, OAR sparing and patient radioprotection. It is therefore worth adaptations of the equipments and practice., Conclusions: Some of these adaptations can be transferred to other PT centers and should be acknowledeged when using non-PT options., (Copyright © 2022 Société française de radiothérapie oncologique (SFRO). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: The increased number of cancer survivors and the recognition of physical and psychosocial challenges, present from cancer diagnosis through active treatment and beyond, led to the discipline of cancer survivorship., Design and Methods: Herein, we reflected on the different components of survivorship care, existing models and priorities, in order to facilitate the promotion of high-quality European survivorship care and research., Results: We identified five main components of survivorship care: (i) physical effects of cancer and chronic medical conditions; (ii) psychological effects of cancer; (iii) social, work and financial effects of cancer; (iv) surveillance for recurrences and second cancers; and (v) cancer prevention and overall health and well-being promotion. Survivorship care can be delivered by structured care models including but not limited to shared models integrating primary care and oncology services. The choice of the care model to be implemented has to be adapted to local realities. High-quality care should be expedited by the generation of: (i) focused and shared European recommendations, (ii) creation of tools to facilitate implementation of coordinated care and (iii) survivorship educational programs for health care teams and patients. The research agenda should be defined with the participation of health care providers, researchers, policy makers, patients and caregivers. The following patient-centered survivorship research areas were highlighted: (i) generation of a big data platform to collect long-term real-world data in survivors and healthy controls to (a) understand the resources, needs and preferences of patients with cancer, and (b) understand biological determinants of survivorship issues, and (ii) develop innovative effective interventions focused on the main components of survivorship care., Conclusions: The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) can actively contribute in the efforts of the oncology community toward (a) promoting the development of high-quality survivorship care programs, (b) providing educational material and (c) aiding groundbreaking research by reflecting on priorities and by supporting research networking., (Copyright © 2022 European Society for Medical Oncology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Pediatric cancers are rare, representing almost 2,500 new cases each year in France meaning 1% of all cancers. Since 2012, a twice-monthly national web-based conference was held in France. Any patient with a pediatric type cancer requiring radiotherapy can be discussed. It aims at answering the physician with specific radiation therapy questions on rare and complex indications, at promoting the use of referential and the inclusion into clinical protocols., Results: From 2012 to 2018, 1,078 cases were discussed for 940 patients in 142 meetings. Mean age was 10 years old (4 months to 45 years). The mean number of attendants was 6 (2 to 32). We review in this paper the main clinical features discussed in the web-conference and the decision of the web-conference. In 85% cases, the first treatment proposed was mostly accepted, but in 15%, other proposals were done (modifications of target volumes, doses or indications)., Conclusions: Between 2012 and 2018, more than 1,000 pediatric irradiation cases were discussed in our web-based conference leading to 15% of change in radiation protocol. The rarity and the complexity of these situations need those meetings. They provide a place to improve the global knowledge and the quality of the treatments provided., (Copyright © 2022 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Paediatric radiotherapy differs greatly from its practice in adults mainly because of the age (median age 6 years), which poses the problem of irradiation of healthy tissues in a growing organism, causing sequelae, difficult compliance and management of parents. These particularities require a dedicated education and specific organisation that was set progressively concerning indications, quality control, exhaustive collection of native dosimetry, long-term follow-up and clinical and translational research, as well as accreditations to practice paediatric radiotherapy, in close collaboration with the French society of child and adolescent cancer and leukaemia (SFCE), under the aegis of the French group of paediatric radiotherapy (GFRP). This organization is a pioneer in the development of pediatric radiotherapy quality controls, which are becoming the European standard and in the collection of native dosimetry integrated with the follow-up of possible late-effects, constituting the most important international database., (Copyright © 2022 Société française de radiothérapie oncologique (SFRO). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

While pain remains a burden for many cancer patients, their active involvement in dealing with it through therapeutic patient education (TPE) has proved effective in overcoming hurdles to pain management. This article describes how a regional TPE programme devoted to cancer pain was set up, as well as the difficulties and opportunities encountered during its implementation. Ten nurse-doctor pairs from the chronic pain units of Lower Normandy, after being trained in TPE, designed and built the EFFADOL (Ensemble Faire Face A la DOuLeur [Cope together with pain]) programme. They collaboratively developed the pedagogical, evaluation and communication tools used in the programme. After the educational diagnosis step, patients are able to follow three sessions in order to acquire the following skills: (1) understanding the different types of pain, (2) understanding pain treatments and their adverse reactions and (3) optimally managing pain on a daily basis. Patients can ask a relative to join the sessions and can choose their preferred modality (individual and/or collective sessions). Programme implementation and the importance of communicating with oncologists and independent health professionals are discussed. The programme, which is available to patients close to home, meets their needs as previously assessed through a regional prospective survey. Difficulties to include patients and opportunities to address them are identified. The programme's limitations mainly concern its organization, structure and communication issues. The main challenge remains the overhaul of care practices and the role of the caregiver to allow patient autonomy., (© 2020. American Association for Cancer Education.)

Background: Alleviating suffering and improving quality of life are universally shared goals. In this context, we implemented a pilot study to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a mindfulness intervention in the form of meditation involving together cancer patients, health professionals, and third persons., Methods: Two groups of 15 participants equally composed of patients, health professionals and third persons were constituted. A dedicated programme on mindfulness and compassion was constructed, including 12 weekly sessions of 1.5 h and a half-day retreat. Adherence and satisfaction with the programme were evaluated. All participants completed questionnaires on perceived stress, quality of life, mindfulness, empathy, and self-efficacy. Burnout was assessed in health professionals., Results: Shared meditation was feasible as 70% of participants attended ≥ 80% of the 13 meditation sessions. Satisfaction with the programme was high (median satisfaction score: 9.1 out of 10) and all participants expressed positive attitudes towards shared meditation and a benefit on their global quality of life. Participants reported significant improvement in stress (p < 0.001), global quality of life (p = 0.004), self-efficacy (p < 0.001), and mindfulness skills (p < 0.001) from baseline to post-programme., Conclusions: This study demonstrated the feasibility of a shared dedicated meditation programme in terms of participation and acceptability of participants. The measured benefits observed among participants furthermore justify the interest of a subsequent randomized study aiming to demonstrate the potential added value of shared meditation by promoting bridge-building between cancer patients, health professionals and others., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT04410185 . Registered on June 1, 2020., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

The RadioTransNet programme launched under the auspices of French societies for radiation oncology (SFRO) and medical physics (SFPM) was approved by the French national cancer institute (INCa) in December 2018 and is dedicated to proposing a relevant national and transversal structure for preclinical research including translational research in radiation oncology with well-defined priority areas of research. Its activities, coordinated by a scientific committee that includes radiation oncologists, medical physicists, academic biologists, are structured around several main areas, i.e.: target volume definition, interaction of radiation with normal tissues, combined treatments and modern dose calculation approaches. Four work packages have been created in these areas and are associated with other objectives pertaining to fundamental radiobiology, early implementation of new drugs in a preclinical setting, contribution of imaging in this task, research in medical physics including transversal components such as medical oncology, radiology, nuclear medicine and also cost/efficiency evaluation. All these tasks will be included in a national network that uses the complementary expertise provided by partners involved in the scheme. Calls for proposals will be selected by the scientific council to be submitted to INCa and the various academic associations to obtain funding for the human and technical resources required to conduct under optimal conditions projects in preclinical and translational research in radiation-oncology., (Copyright © 2021 Société française de radiothérapie oncologique (SFRO). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: Survival-based surrogate endpoints such as progression-free survival (PFS) are commonly used in oncology clinical trials. The evaluation-time bias in the assessment of median disease progression in randomized trials has been suggested by several simulation studies, but never demonstrated in the clinic. We aimed to demonstrate the existence of potential evaluation-time bias by assessing the impact of the timing of tumor assessments on median PFS from control arms without any active treatment of randomized controlled trials involving advanced cancer patients., Materials and Methods: A systematic literature search of English language publications from 1 January 2000 to 7 January 2021 was performed using MEDLINE (PubMed). Eligible trials for our meta-analysis included all randomized clinical trials evaluating anticancer drugs in adult patients with advanced cancers with a control arm without any anticancer drug consisting of best supportive care with or without a placebo. We performed a meta-regression analysis to analyze the correlation between the timing of the first tumor assessment and median PFS in patients randomized in the control arms without any active treatment., Results: Of 3551 studies screened, 97 eligible trials were retrieved involving 36  747 patients, including 14  229 patients randomized into the control arms. A later first tumor assessment correlated with a prolonged median PFS (R 2  = 0.44, P < 10 -5 )., Conclusions: Our results confirm the existence of potential evaluation-time bias in clinical research that had been suggested by simulation studies. The timing of tumor assessments should be kept the same in precision medicine trials using the PFS ratio as an efficacy endpoint., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

The purpose of this article is to describe the external irradiation process and updated recommendations of the French society for radiation oncology for patient follow-up., (Copyright © 2021 Société française de radiothérapie oncologique (SFRO). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

The purpose of the first two editions of the guidelines for external radiotherapy procedures, published in 2007 and 2016 respectively, was to issue recommendations aimed at optimising, harmonising and standardising practices. The purpose of this third edition, which includes brachytherapy, is identical while also taking into account recent technological improvements (intensity modulation radiation therapy, stereotactic radiotherapy, and three-dimension brachytherapy) along with findings from literature. Part one describes the daily use of general principles (quality, security, image-guided radiation therapy); part two describes each treatment step for the main types of cancer., (Copyright © 2021 Société française de radiothérapie oncologique (SFRO). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: The difficulty in interpreting somatic alterations is correlated with the increase in sequencing panel size. To correctly guide the clinical management of patients with cancer, there needs to be accurate classification of pathogenicity followed by actionability assessment. Here, we describe a specific detailed workflow for the classification of the pathogenicity of somatic variants in cancer into five categories: benign, likely benign, unknown significance, likely pathogenic and pathogenic., Methods: Classification is obtained by combining a set of eight relevant criteria in favour of either a pathogenic or a benign effect (pathogenic stand-alone, pathogenic very strong, pathogenic strong, pathogenic moderate, pathogenic supporting, benign supporting, benign strong and benign stand-alone)., Results: Our guide is concordant with the ACMG/AMP 2015 guidelines for germline variants. Interpretation of somatic variants requires considering specific criteria, such as the disease and therapeutic context, co-occurring genomic events in the tumour when available and the use of cancer-specific variant databases. In addition, the gene role in tumorigenesis (oncogene or tumour suppressor gene) also needs to be taken into consideration., Conclusion: Our classification could contribute to homogenize best practices on somatic variant pathogenicity interpretation and improve interpretation consistency both within and between laboratories., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Introduction: Mindfulness meditation is likely to promote better management of stress, pain and negative emotions. We propose to address the benefit of meditation in an open setting associating people with cancer (target population), medical staff and witnesses (neither patient nor medical staff). This study aims (1) to evaluate the effects of meditation on wellness improvement and (2) to identify criteria and modalities for a subsequent randomised study., Methods and Analysis: We propose a longitudinal pilot study consisting of a non-randomised experimental preintervention/postintervention survey. The intervention consists in delivering a meditation programme (12 weekly meditation sessions of 1.5 hours each), specifically adapted to our target population and addressing our research hypothesis in an open setting involving people with cancer, medical staff and witnesses (equally distributed in two groups of 15 participants). The main objective is to evaluate participants' adherence to the programme. The effects of meditation will be evaluated on stress, quality of life, feeling of personal effectiveness, on the development of mindfulness and empathy, and on satisfaction and perception of a change in quality of life. We will also measure the putative added value of 'meditating together'. This study is expected to allow validating the evaluation tools and refining the modalities of the workshops. We expect to demonstrate the evolution that this meditation-based intervention induces in the participants. We aim to promote bridge-building, between patients, medical staff but also others. In this way, one's own suffering may be understood in the light of others' suffering, thereby promoting the sense of otherness and giving insights into 'living better with'. This exploratory study will investigate the relevance of this hypothesis, which could then be explored by a randomised study., Ethics and Dissemination: The protocol was approved by the local ethics committee (Comité de Protection des Personnes Est II). Trial findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals., Trial Registration Number: NCT04410185., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTMs) are part of the standard cancer care process in many European countries. In France, they are a mandatory condition in the authorization system for cancer care administration, with the goal to ensure that all new patients diagnosed with cancer are presented in MDTMs., Aim: Identify the factors associated with non-presentation or unknown presentation in MDTMs, and study the impact of presentation in MDTMs on quality of care and survival in patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC)., Methods: 3999 CRC patients diagnosed between 2005 and 2014 in the area covered by the "Calvados Registry of Digestive Tumours" were included. Multivariate multinomial logistic regression was used to assess the factors associated with presentation in MDTMs. Univariate analyses were performed to study the impact of MDTMs on quality of care. Multivariate Cox model and the Log-Rank test were used to assess the impact of MDTMs on survival., Results: Non-presentation or unknown presentation in MDTMs were associated with higher age at diagnosis, dying within 3 months after diagnosis, unknown metastatic status, non-metastatic cancer and colon cancer. Non-presentation was associated with a diagnosis after 2010. Unknown presentation was associated with a diagnosis before 2007 and a longer travel time to the reference care centres. Presentation in MDTMs was associated with more chemotherapy administration for patients with metastatic cancer and more adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with stage III colon cancer. After excluding poor prognosis patients, lower survival was significantly associated with higher age at diagnosis, unknown metastatic status or metastatic cancer, presence of comorbidities, rectal cancer and non-presentation in MDTMs (HR = 1.5 [1.1-2.0], p < 0.001)., Conclusions: Elderly and poor prognosis patients were less presented in MDTMs. Geriatric assessments before presentation in MDTMs were shown to improve care plan establishment. The 100% objective is not coherent if MDTMs are only to discuss diagnosis and curative cares. They could also be a place to discuss therapeutic limitations. MDTMs were associated with better treatment and longer survival. We must ensure that there is no inequity in presentation in MDTMs that could lead to a loss of chance for patients., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

In the current spectrum of cancer treatments, despite high costs, a lack of robust evidence based on clinical outcomes or technical and radiobiological uncertainties, particle therapy and in particular proton therapy (PT) is rapidly growing. Despite proton therapy being more than fifty years old (first proposed by Wilson in 1946) and more than 220,000 patients having been treated with in 2020, many technological challenges remain and numerous new technical developments that must be integrated into existing systems. This article presents an overview of on-going technical developments and innovations that we felt were most important today, as well as those that have the potential to significantly shape the future of proton therapy. Indeed, efforts have been done continuously to improve the efficiency of a PT system, in terms of cost, technology and delivery technics, and a number of different developments pursued in the accelerator field will first be presented. Significant developments are also underway in terms of transport and spatial resolution achievable with pencil beam scanning, or conformation of the dose to the target: we will therefore discuss beam focusing and collimation issues which are important parameters for the development of these techniques, as well as proton arc therapy. State of the art and alternative approaches to adaptive PT and the future of adaptive PT will finally be reviewed. Through these overviews, we will finally see how advances in these different areas will allow the potential for robust dose shaping in proton therapy to be maximised, probably foreshadowing a future era of maturity for the PT technique., (Copyright © 2021 Société française de radiothérapie oncologique (SFRO). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

The comet assay or single cell gel electrophoresis, is the most common method used to measure strand breaks and a variety of other DNA lesions in human populations. To estimate the risk of overall mortality, mortality by cause, and cancer incidence associated to DNA damage, a cohort of 2,403 healthy individuals (25,978 person-years) screened in 16 laboratories using the comet assay between 1996 and 2016 was followed-up. Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated a worse overall survival in the medium and high tertile of DNA damage (p < 0.001). The effect of DNA damage on survival was modelled according to Cox proportional hazard regression model. The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) was 1.42 (1.06-1.90) for overall mortality, and 1.94 (1.04-3.59) for diseases of the circulatory system in subjects with the highest tertile of DNA damage. The findings of this study provide epidemiological evidence encouraging the implementation of the comet assay in preventive strategies for non-communicable diseases., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

The tumor microenvironment is a complex mix of cancerous and noncancerous cells (especially immune cells and fibroblasts) with distinct metabolisms. These cells interact with each other and are influenced by the metabolic disorders of the host. In this review, we discuss how metabolic pathways that sustain biosynthesis in cancer cells could be targeted to increase the effectiveness of cancer therapies by limiting the nutrient uptake of the cell, inactivating metabolic enzymes (key regulatory ones or those linked to cell cycle progression), and inhibiting ATP production to induce cell death. Furthermore, we describe how the microenvironment could be targeted to activate the immune response by redirecting nutrients toward cytotoxic immune cells or inhibiting the release of waste products by cancer cells that stimulate immunosuppressive cells. We also examine metabolic disorders in the host that could be targeted to inhibit cancer development. To create future personalized therapies for targeting each cancer tumor, novel techniques must be developed, such as new tracers for positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan and immunohistochemical markers to characterize the metabolic phenotype of cancer cells and their microenvironment. Pending personalized strategies that specifically target all metabolic components of cancer development in a patient, simple metabolic interventions could be tested in clinical trials in combination with standard cancer therapies, such as short cycles of fasting or the administration of sodium citrate or weakly toxic compounds (such as curcumin, metformin, lipoic acid) that target autophagy and biosynthetic or signaling pathways., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition.)

The risk of cancer associated with persons with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) prescribed with disease modifying therapies (DMTs) is not well established. This observational, cross-sectional, pharmacovigilance cohort study examined individual case safety reports from the World Health Organization database: VigiBase®. All consecutive reports of DMTs prescribed to pwMS (alemtuzumab, dimethyl fumarate, fingolimod, glatiramer acetate, interferon-β, natalizumab, ocrelizumab, and teriflunomide), and their serious adverse event cases were eligible, excluding those reporting immunosuppressant DMTs used as anticancer therapies. The primary outcome was the multivariate odds ratio of cancer reporting (r-OR) for DMTs prescribed to pwMS after imputation of missing data. There were 5966 cancer cases from 240,993 reports of DMTs prescribed to pwMS. After adjustments on age, sex, and geographical region, natalizumab (r-OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.63-1.87), interferon-β (r-OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.30-1.49), dimethyl fumarate (r-OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.25-1.46), and fingolimod (r-OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.06-1.24) were significantly associated with a greater cancer reporting, whereas alemtuzumab, glatiramer acetate, ocrelizumab, and teriflunomide were not, in the disproportionality analysis. As exploratory analyses, upper aerodigestive tract, breast, urinary including the male genitourinary tract, and nervous system cancers were associated with natalizumab, interferon-β, and dimethyl fumarate. Fingolimod was only associated with skin cancer types. Cancer cases reporting these four DMTs prescribed to pwMS were younger in age than for non-pwMS drugs in the VigiBase® (p < 0.0001). A close and regular cancer screening in pwMS treated with natalizumab, interferon-β, dimethyl fumarate, and fingolimod may be warranted, even for persons at a younger age. Trial Registration NCT04237337., (© 2021. The American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, Inc.)

The COVID-19 pandemic has a major impact at all stages of cancer treatment. Risk of death from COVID-19 in patients treated for a cancer is high. COVID-19 vaccines represent a major issue to decrease the rate of severe forms of the COVID-19 cases and to maintain a normal cancer care. It is difficult to define the target population for vaccination due to the limited data available and the lack of vaccine doses available. It appears theoretically important to vaccinate patients with active cancer treatment or treated since less than three years, as well as their family circle. In France, patients actually defined at "high risk" for priority access to vaccination are those with a cancer treated by chemotherapy. A panel of experts recently defined another "very high-priority" population, which includes patients with curative or palliative first or second-line chemotherapy, as well as patients requiring surgery or radiotherapy involving a large lung volume, lymph nodes and/or of hematopoietic tissue. Ideally, it is best to vaccinate before cancer treatment. Despite the lack of published data, COVID-19 vaccines can also be performed during chemotherapy by avoiding periods of bone marrow aplasia and if possible, to do it in cancer care centers. It is necessary to implement cohorts with immunological and clinical monitoring of vaccinated cancer patients. To conclude, considering the current state of knowledge, the benefit-risk ratio strongly favours COVID-19 vaccination of all cancer patients., (Copyright © 2021 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: The impact of the first coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) wave on cancer patient management was measured within the nationwide network of the Unicancer comprehensive cancer centers in France., Patients and Methods: The number of patients diagnosed and treated within 17 of the 18 Unicancer centers was collected in 2020 and compared with that during the same periods between 2016 and 2019. Unicancer centers treat close to 20% of cancer patients in France yearly. The reduction in the number of patients attending the Unicancer centers was analyzed per regions and cancer types. The impact of delayed care on cancer-related deaths was calculated based on different hypotheses., Results: A 6.8% decrease in patients managed within Unicancer in the first 7 months of 2020 versus 2019 was observed. This reduction reached 21% during April and May, and was not compensated in June and July, nor later until November 2020. This reduction was observed only for newly diagnosed patients, while the clinical activity for previously diagnosed patients increased by 4% similar to previous years. The reduction was more pronounced in women, in breast and prostate cancers, and for patients without metastasis. Using an estimated hazard ratio of 1.06 per month of delay in diagnosis and treatment of new patients, we calculated that the delays observed in the 5-month period from March to July 2020 may result in an excess mortality due to cancer of 1000-6000 patients in coming years., Conclusions: In this study, the delays in cancer patient management were observed only for newly diagnosed patients, more frequently in women, for breast cancer, prostate cancer, and nonmetastatic cancers. These delays may result is an excess risk of cancer-related deaths in the coming years., Competing Interests: Disclosure JYB reports research support and honoraria from Troche, BMS, MSD, PharmaMar, Bayer, Deciphera, GSK, Novartis, and AstraZeneca. JPD reports institutional fees for advisory or speaker roles for Genentech, Roche, BMS, MSD, and Novartis, and institutional grants for research projects with Genentech, Roche, BMS, MSD, Debiopharm, and Astra Zeneca. JCS reports shares from AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Gritstone, and is also a full-time employee of AstraZeneca from September 2017 to December 2019. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: There is no treatment for cancer-related cognitive impairment, an important adverse effect that negatively impacts quality of life (QOL). We conducted a 3-arm randomized controlled trial to evaluate the impact of computer-assisted cognitive rehabilitation (CR) on cognition, QOL, anxiety, and depression among cancer patients treated with chemotherapy., Methods: Patients who reported cognitive complaints during or after completing chemotherapy were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 12-week CR programs: computer-assisted CR with a neuropsychologist (experimental group A), home cognitive self-exercises (active control group B), or phone follow-up (active control group C). Subjective cognition was assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function (FACT-Cog), objective cognition was assessed by neuropsychological tests, QOL was assessed by the FACT-General, and depression and anxiety were assessed by psychological tests. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a 7-point improvement in the FACT-Cog perceived cognitive impairment (PCI) score., Results: Among the 167 enrolled patients (median age, 51 years), group A had the highest proportion of patients with a 7-point PCI improvement (75%), followed by groups B (59%) and C (57%), but the difference was not statistically significant (P = .13). Compared with groups B and C, the mean difference in PCI score was significantly higher in group A (P = .02), with better perceived cognitive abilities (P < .01) and a significant improvement in working memory (P = .03). Group A reported higher QOL related to cognition (FACT-Cog QOL) (P = .01) and improvement in depression symptoms (P = .03)., Conclusions: These results suggest a benefit of a computer-based CR program in the management of cancer-related cognitive impairment and complaints., (© 2020 The Authors. Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Cancer Society.)

Purpose: This article aims to describe and list the clinical trials that have changed our practices in breast cancer, urological cancer, gynecological cancer, cancer of the upper aerodigestive tract and digestive cancer in the last ten years., Material and Methods: We listed and selected the studies published between 2010 and 2020. The articles were identified on the basis of a Medline search with PubMed and knowledge of the authors., Results: Five to six trials were selected in breast cancer, urological cancers, gynecological cancers, cancers of the upper aerodigestive tract and digestive cancers asking the different fundamental questions in radiotherapy., Conclusion: Depending on the pathologies, the questions raised over the past 10 years remain fundamental questions such as the place of neoadjuvant treatment, the place of hypofractionation or the type of chemotherapy concomitant with radiotherapy., (Copyright © 2020 Société française de radiothérapie oncologique (SFRO). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

New concepts of medical consultations are currently disrupting the practice of medicine. The use of standardized questionnaires, or patient-reported outcome (PRO and ePRO) has already significantly changed the relationship between the physician and the patient. Telemedicine, or even automatic conversational agents, such as chatbots, are also providing more convenient access to care and medical information for many patients. These tools have a major impact in oncology, precisely because of the rising chronicity of the diseases the radiation oncologists treat. In this article, we provide a detailed analysis of these new concepts., (Copyright © 2020 Société française de radiothérapie oncologique (SFRO). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) corresponds to various replanning strategies aiming to correct for anatomical variations occurring during the course of radiotherapy. The goal of the article was to report the rational, feasibility and benefit of using PET and/or MRI to guide this ART strategy in various tumor localizations. The anatomical modifications defined by scanner taking into account tumour mobility and volume variation are not always sufficient to optimise treatment. The contribution of functional imaging by PET or the precision of soft tissue by MRI makes it possible to consider optimized ART. Today, the most important data for both PET and MRI are for lung, head and neck, cervical and prostate cancers. PET and MRI guided ART appears feasible and safe, however in a very limited clinical experience. Phase I/II studies should be therefore performed, before proposing cost-effectiveness comparisons in randomized trials and before using the approach in routine practice., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Multimodal imaging has become a standard for planning radiation therapy via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or positron emission tomography (PET) in many cancers. However, its use is now old, and its impact has not been much discussed in light of technological improvements in imaging and advances in radiotherapy. However, in 20 years, the exclusive functional imaging has been replaced by hybrid imaging (functional and anatomical) with successive improvements (flight time, detector modifications, digitisation, etc.) have enabled us to go from centimetric resolution to the current 3 to 4mm resolution. This article will specifically review PET technology, its latest advances and the potential impact on radiotherapy, particularly head and neck cancers., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

The planning target volume is an essential notion in radiotherapy, that requires a new conceptualization. Indeed, the variability and diversity of the uncertainties involved or improved with the development of the new modern technologies and devices in radiotherapy suggest that random and systematic errors cannot be currently generalized. This article attempts to discuss these various uncertainties and tries to demonstrate that a redefinition of the concept of planning target volume toward its personalization for each patient and the robustness notion are likely an improvement basis to take into account the radiotherapy uncertainties., (Copyright © 2020 Société française de radiothérapie oncologique (SFRO). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Proton therapy is delivered to selected cancer patients presenting with rare tumours, for which a dose escalation paradigm and/or a reduced dose-bath to the organs at risk is pursued. It is a costly treatment with an additional cost factor of 2-3 when compared to photon radiotherapy. Notwithstanding the 180'000 patients treated with protons, scars robust clinical evidence is available to justify the administration of this treatment modality. The European Particle Therapy Network (EPTN) was created in 2015 to answer the critical European needs for cooperation among protons and carbon ions centres in the framework of clinical research networks. EPTN with other European groups will launch a number of prospective clinical trials that could be practice changing if positive. Alternative way to generate clinical data could be provided by alternative methodologies, such as the Dutch model-based approach, or could be provided by European infrastructure projects., (Copyright © 2020 Société française de radiothérapie oncologique (SFRO). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Computed tomography (CT) in the treatment position is currently indispensable for planning radiation therapy. Other imaging modalities, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission-tomography (PET), can be used to improve the definition of the tumour and/or healthy tissue but also to provide functional data of the target volume. Accurate image registration is essential for treatment planning, so MRI and PET scans should be registered at the planning CT scan. Hybrid PET/MRI scans with a hard plane can be used but pose the problem of the absence of CT scans. Finally, techniques for moving the patient on a rigid air-cushioned table allow PET/CT/MRI scans to be performed in the treatment position while limiting the patient's movements exist. At the same time, the advent of MRI-linear accelerator systems allows to redefine image-guided radiotherapy and to propose treatments with daily recalculation of the dose. The place of PET during treatment remains more confidential and currently only in research and prototype status. The same development of imaging during radiotherapy is underway in proton therapy., (Copyright © 2020 Société française de radiothérapie oncologique (SFRO). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Imaging is critical to each step of precision radiation therapy, i.e. planning, setup, delivery and assessment of response. Hadrontherapy can be considered to deliver more precise dose distribution that may better spare normal tissues from intermediate low doses of radiation. In addition, hadrontherapy using high linear energy transfer ions may also be used for dose escalation on biological target volumes defined by functional imaging. However, the physical characteristics of hadrontherapy also make it more demanding in terms of imaging accuracy and image-based dose calculation. Some of the developments needed in imaging are specific to hadrontherapy. The current review addresses current status of imaging in proton therapy and the drawbacks of photon-based imaging for hadrons. It also addresses requirements in hadrontherapy planning with respect to multimodal imaging for proper target and organ at risk definition as well as to target putative radioresistant areas such as hypoxic ones, and with respect to dose calculation using dual energy CT, MR-proton therapy, proton radiography. Imaging modalities, such as those used in photon-based radiotherapy (intensity modulated and stereotactic radiotherapy), are somewhat already implemented or should be reaching "routine" hadrontherapy (at least proton therapy) practice in planning, repositioning and response evaluation optimizable within the next five years. Online monitoring imaging by PET, as currently developed for hadrontherapy, is already available. Its spatiotemporal limits restrict its use but similar to prompt gamma detection, represents an area of active research for the next 5 to 10 years. Because of the more demanding and specific dose deposit characteristics, developments image-guided hadrontherapy, such as specific proton imaging using tomography or ionoacoustics, as well as delivery with MR-proton therapy, may take another 10 years to reach the clinics in specific applications. Other aspects are briefly described such as range monitoring. Finally, the potential of imaging normal tissue changes and challenges to assess tumour response are discussed., (Copyright © 2020 Société française de radiothérapie oncologique (SFRO). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)