Search

Antibody-based therapy has revitalized the world of cancer therapeutics since rituximab was first approved for the treatment of Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma. Monoclonal antibodies against cancer antigens have been successful strategies for only a handful of cancer types due to many reasons including lack of antibody specificity and complex nature of tumor milieu which interfere with antibody efficacy. Polyspecific antibodies are promising class of anti-cancer agents which can be directed at multiple tumor antigens to eradicate tumor cells more precisely and effectively. They may overcome some of these limitations and have already changed treatment landscape for some malignancies such as B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Pre-clinical studies and early phase clinical trials have demonstrated that this approach may be an effective strategy even for solid tumors. This review focuses on the development of bispecific and trispecific antibody therapy for the treatment of solid tumor malignancies and highlights the potential they hold for future therapies to come.

For more than 2,000 years, arsenic and its derivatives have shown medical utility. Owing to the toxicities and potential carcinogenicity of arsenicals, their popularity has fluctuated. The exact mechanism of action of therapeutic arsenic is not well characterized but likely to involve apoptosis, generation of reactive oxygen species, inhibition of intracellular transduction pathways, and cell functions. Arsenic trioxide has received approval for use in patients with relapsed acute promyelocytic leukemia for remission induction. Arsenic has additionally shown activity in a range of solid tumors, myelodysplastic syndrome, multiple myeloma, and in autoimmune diseases. The following is a review of the history of arsenic, its cellular metabolism, pharmacology, genetic basis of disposition, associated toxicities, and clinical efficacy.

Background: Cancer patients have an increased incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Inferior vena cava (IVC) filters are used extensively in the US, and more than 40 000 are inserted annually. The impact on survival of cancer patients receiving IVC filters has not been studied., Methods: A retrospective study examined 206 consecutive cancer patients with VTE to compare the effects of IVC filter placement with anticoagulation (AC) therapy on overall survival (OS), as measured from the time of VTE. Patients were classified into 3 treatment groups: AC (n = 62), IVC filter (77), or combination IVC filter + AC (67)., Results: Treatment groups did not differ with respect to age, sex, or albumin levels. Median OS was significantly greater in patients treated with AC (13 months) compared with those treated with IVC filters (2 months) or IVC + AC (3.25 months; P < .0002). IVC patients were 1.9 times more at risk of death than AC only (hazard ratio = .528; 95% confidence interval = .374 to .745). Multivariate analysis revealed that performance status and type of thrombus were not confounders and had no effect on OS., Conclusion: The need for the insertion of an IVC filter projected markedly reduced survival. Patients requiring an IVC filter rather than AC as initial therapy face a 2-fold increase in risk of death. Whether or not this therapeutic procedure has a positive impact on outcome in cancer patients is uncertain. Complications resulting from thrombosis were also analyzed in this cohort. A prospective randomized trial at our institution is addressing this issue.

Background: Irinotecan and capecitabine have a broad spectrum of activity in human malignancy and are synergistic in an animal model when irinotecan precedes capecitabine., Patients and Methods: A Phase I design of the combination of irinotecan IV Day 1 with capecitabine on Days 2-8 every 2 weeks was evaluated in 27 adult patients with solid tumors. Two sequential schema were used: Arm A fixed the dose of irinotecan at 100 mg/m(2) and escalated capecitabine in cohorts, and arm B fixed the dose of capecitabine at 750 mg/m(2) PO BID and escalated the dosage of irinotecan., Results: Neutropenia was dose limiting with nausea and diarrhea as the most common nonhematological toxicities. Significant interpatient variation in toxicity occurred despite uniform dosing. No Grade IV toxicities were encountered. Grade III toxicity occurred in first cycle in 15 percent (3/20) patients in arm A and 29 percent (2/7) of patients in arm B. All toxicities were reversible. Repetitive dosing was feasible with prolonged disease stabilization in 8 patients., Conclusions: The suggested Phase II dose of this combination and schedule is irinotecan 100 mg/m(2) and capecitabine 1000 mg/m(2) BID. Some patients tolerated a capecitabine dose as high as 1250 mg/m(2) BID.

Purpose: LY293111, a novel diaryl ether carboxylic acid derivative, is a potent and selective inhibitor of the lipoxygenase pathway either directly through 5'-lipoxygenase or via antagonism of the leukotriene B4 (LTB4) receptor. More recently it has been determined to have peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-gamma agonist (PPARgamma) activity. LY293111 has antineoplastic activity in a variety of preclinical models. The tolerability and pharmacokinetics of LY293111 administered continuously, by mouth, BID for repeat cycles of 21 days was evaluated., Patients and Methods: Thirty-eight patients with advanced solid tumors were treated at five dose levels (200 to 800 mg BID) for a total of 102 cycles., Results: The most common toxicity was diarrhea (76%). One patient at 600 mg BID (n = 11) and two at 800 mg BID (n = 8), experienced dose-limiting grade 3 diarrhea. Dose reductions and/or delays were infrequent. Increases in steady-state maximum plasma concentration (Cmax,ss) and area under the steady-state plasma concentration time curve 0 to 12 hours (AUCtau,ss) on day 8 could be considered to be dose-proportional over the four-fold-dose range. Interpatient variability in Cmax,ss and AUCtau,ss was estimated to be 65% and 71% respectively. There was a small increase in AUC (1.37; 90% CI, 0.85 to 2.21) between single and multiple doses. Two patients with progressive chondrosarcoma and melanoma had stable disease lasting approximately 336 and 168 days, respectively., Conclusion: LY293111 can be administered safely by continuous oral therapy with mild toxicities. Diarrhea is dose-limiting. The recommended phase II dose will be 600 mg BID. The steady-state concentrations in humans exceed relevant levels observed in preclinical models.

Androgens play a critical role not only in the physiological development of the prostate but also in the genesis of prostate cancer. The effects of androgen on the prostate gland and on the other tissues of the body are mediated by activation of the androgen receptor. The androgen receptor is a member of the superfamily of hormone receptors with a DNA-binding site, two zinc finger domains, and a hormone-binding site. Mutations in this receptor can be associated with loss of function or chronic endogeneous activation, depending upon the site of change. Androgens effect a conformal change in the structure of the androgen receptor associated with a change in protein phosphorylation. The androgen receptor can be activated by additional ligands affecting the hormone-binding site besides androgens. Activators and repressors of the androgen receptor modify this protein's function and are very delicately balanced such that disruptions of either function are associated with a disease state. Antiandrogens, which bind to the receptor and thus down-regulate the effects of endogeneous circulating androgens, remain the first line treatment for palliation of advanced prostate cancer. Mutations in the receptor are associated with a change in function of such compounds from antagonist to agonist in vitro. Newer evidence suggests there may be a role of intermittent androgen suppression rather than continuous suppression, perhaps by preventing overgrowth of hormone independent tumor cells. Future research focuses on the development of drugs directed at suppressing the androgen drive of the androgen sensitive clone of the tumor and making the nonsensitive subset more susceptible to cytotoxics.

Purpose: In this phase I trial in humans the safety and pharmacology of LY309887 on a weekly schedule combined with daily oral 5-mg doses of folic acid were evaluated., Background: LY309887 is an inhibitor of folate-dependent enzymes involved in de novo purine biosynthesis and has a broad preclinical antitumor activity. In murine systems, combining this agent with exogenous folic acid results in an enhanced therapeutic index., Methods: This study was a single-institution, open-label, clinical trial of dose escalation with toxicity and pharmacokinetic parameters determined. The dose range studied was 0.5-4 mg/m2 per week x6 and then a modified schedule weekly x3 every 6 weeks., Results: Dose-limiting toxicities were of delayed onset and associated with hematologic, neurologic, and mucosal effects. Pharmacokinetic parameters revealed dose linearity for AUC and Cmax. Low circulating levels of drug persisted for over 200 h. Urinary excretion accounted for approximately 50% of the parent drug but was highly variable. The urinary excretion was near maximal within 24 h of dosing., Conclusions: The modified dosing schedule allowed repetitive dosing in patients. Further evaluation of the 2 mg/m2 per week x3 every 6 weeks with daily oral folate supplement as a potential phase II dose may be warranted.

Purpose: To evaluate the toxicology and pharmacology of an orally active fluoropyrimidine given as a continuous daily dose divided into two portions for 6 weeks, and to determine the maximal-tolerated daily dose (MTD) and the suggested phase II daily dose., Patients and Methods: Solid-tumor patients with a Karnofsky performance status greater than 70 who had normal organ function and resolution of the effects of prior therapy, and who gave informed written consent, were enrolled. Oral capecitabine, as a divided morning and evening dose, was administered to cohorts of a minimum of 3 patients starting at 110 mg/m2 and escalating by means of a modified Fibonacci scheme to 1,657 mg/m2/d. Pharmacologic samples were obtained on days 1 and 15. Toxicity evaluations were performed approximately every 3 days for the first 43 days. Antitumor effect was evaluated at day 42 of therapy., Results: Thirty-three patients entered the study. Few side effects occurred at or below 1,331 mg/m2/d. The MTD was 1,657 mg/m2/d with limiting toxicities of palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia, nausea, vomiting, vertigo, abdominal pain, diarrhea, and thrombocytopenia. All toxicities were reversible. A mixed response was seen in one breast cancer patient. Pharmacologic studies showed rapid and extensive metabolism of the parent drug into cytotoxic metabolites with a maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) 1 hour after ingestion. Linear increases in the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and Cmax were seen with linear increases in administered dose., Conclusion: The suggested phase II dose on a continuous 42-day dosing schedule is 1,331 mg/m2/d. Linear pharmacologic parameters of the parent compound and metabolites are demonstrated.

Etoposide is a widely used cytotoxic agent with a broad spectrum of activity in human malignancies. This agent has been incorporated into many transplant regimens although toxicity occurs because of its poor water solubility and toxic excipients. Etoposide phosphate, a water soluble prodrug of etoposide, has been studied at conventional dosages in man and shown to have advantages over the parent compound. We have extended our previous experience with this new agent to evaluate the levels needed in transplantation protocols. This phase I study of intravenous high-dose etoposide phosphate over 2 h on days 1 and 2 was designed to determine whether or not dose linearity between the amount of etoposide phosphate administered to patients and generation of etoposide in vivo as seen with conventional dosages of this agent would be present at transplant-dose levels. In addition, the toxicities of these dose levels with the short infusion schedule were defined. A conservative dose escalation scheme was chosen based upon prior knowledge of etoposide. Thirty-one patients (19 male, 12 female) with CALGB performance status 0-1 with a variety of solid tumors entered this study. The patients were treated with dose levels of etoposide phosphate given as the etoposide-equivalent doses of 250, 500, 750, 1000, 1200, 1400, and 1600 mg/m2/day in 250-400 ml of normal saline given as an intravenous infusion over 2 h on days 1 and 2 every 28 days. After the maximal tolerated dose level was determined on this schedule, additional patients received etoposide phosphate as a 4 h infusion on both days in an attempt to reduce toxicities. G-CSF (5 micrograms/kg/day) was administered subcutaneously to all patients from day 3 until the WBC > or = 10000/microliters. Nonhematologic toxicity was considered to be dose limiting. Serial plasma samples for pharmacokinetics were obtained from patients on day 1 of cycle 1. For the 2 h infusion, the maximum tolerated dose of etoposide phosphate was 1000 mg/m2/day x 2 with dose limiting mucositis. In the small number of patients studied, the maximum tolerated dose was reached for the 4 h infusion at 1400 mg/m2/day of drug, again due to mucositis. Other toxicities, despite the rapid infusion schedule, were modest with transient mild headache being most common. At the highest doses etoposide phosphate was efficiently and rapidly dephosphorylated to etoposide. Etoposide generated by dephosphorylation of etoposide phosphate had plasma disposition curves characteristic of etoposide administered parenterally. One partial response occurred in a patient with small cell lung cancer. Etoposide phosphate can be rapidly infused in modest fluid volumes at dosages required for transplantation protocols with minimal acute side-effects. On a 2 h schedule, mucositis becomes the dose limiting nonhematologic toxicity. Mucositis seems to correlate with peak dose levels of the drug rather than total drug administered. On a 4 h infusion schedule given sequentially for 2 days, the maximum tolerated dosage could be increased 40% compared to the 2 h schedule. The relative ease of administration and the rapid conversion of this prodrug into etoposide should make it useful in high-dose therapy settings.

Etoposide phosphate, a water soluble prodrug of etoposide, was evaluated at levels potentially useful in transplantation settings in patients with malignancies. For pharmacokinetic studies of etoposide phosphate in this phase I study, 21 patients with solid tumors were treated with etoposide phosphate given as etoposide equivalents of 250, 500, 750, 1000 and 1200 mg/m2 infused over 2 h on days 1 and 2, and G-CSF 5 micrograms/kg per day starting on day 3 until WBC was > or = 10,000/microliters. Qualitative, quantitative, and pharmacokinetic analysis was performed as reported previously. Rapid conversion of etoposide phosphate into etoposide by dephosphorylation occurred at all dosage levels without indication of saturation of phosphatases. Plasma levels (C(pmax)) and area under the curve (AUC) of etoposide phosphate and etoposide demonstrated linear dose effects. For etoposide, plasma disposition demonstrated biphasic clearance, with mean T1/2 alpha of 2.09 +/- 0.61 h, and T1/2 beta of 5.83 +/- 1.71 h. An AUC as high as 1768.50 micrograms.h/ml was observed at a dose of 1200 mg/m2. The total body clearance (TBC) showed an overall mean of 15.72 +/- 4.25 ml/min per m2, and mean volume of distribution (VDss) of 5.64 +/- 1.06 l/m2. The mean residual time (MRT) for etoposide was 6.24 +/- 1.61 h. In urine, etoposide but not etoposide phosphate, was identified with large quantitative variations (1.83% to 33.45% of injected etoposide equivalents). These results indicate that etoposide phosphate is converted into etoposide with the linear dose-related C(pmax) and AUCs necessary for use of this agent at the high dosage levels needed in transplantation protocols. A comparison of pharmacokinetic parameters of high-dose etoposide with the values observed in our study with etoposide phosphate revealed comparable values for the clinically important C(pmax) and AUCs, clearance, terminal T1/2 and MRT. In contrast to the use of etoposide, etoposide phosphate can be delivered in aqueous vehicles and therefore may offer the advantage of ease of administration.

Amonafide (A) demonstrates dose-related increases in area under the curve (AUC) and Cmax values. Total body clearance for A (ranging from 44.2 to 53.8 L/hr/m2) is relatively constant within the dosing range of this study. The dose-related increase of AUC was also observed for the two identified metabolites, acetylamonafide (AA) and noramonafide (NA). A and NA plasma data could be described by a four-compartmental model (two compartments for A, one compartment each for NA and AA). The fitting for NA was poor owing to its low plasma concentration. The terminal half-lives for A, NA, and AA were in the range of 3-6 hr. No cumulative accumulation of parent compound or metabolites was detected after daily administration, The concentrations of A, NA, and AA 24 hr after dosing were either below or very close to the quantitative limits of the assay. Polymorphic disposition of A was confirmed by a frequency distribution of AUC value versus dose plot.

Purpose: To determine the toxicities, maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), and pharmacology of etoposide phosphate, a water-soluble etoposide derivative, administered as a 5-minute intravenous infusion on a schedule of days 1, 3, and 5 repeated every 21 days., Patients and Methods: Thirty-six solid tumor patients with a mean age of 63 years, performance status of 0 to 1, WBC count > or = 4,000/microL, and platelet count > or = 100,000/microL, with normal hepatic and renal function were studied. Doses evaluated in etoposide equivalents were 50, 75, 100, 125, 150, 175, and 200 mg/m2/d. Etoposide in plasma and urine and etoposide phosphate in plasma were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Eleven of 36 patients were treated with concentrated etoposide phosphate at 150 mg/m2/d., Results: Grade I/II nausea, vomiting, alopecia, and fatigue were common. Leukopenia (mainly neutropenia) occurred at doses greater than 75 mg/m2, with the nadir occurring between days 15 and 19 posttreatment. All effects were reversible. Hypotension, bronchospasm, and allergic reactions were not observed in the first 25 patients. The MTD due to leukopenia was determined to be between 175 and 200 mg/m2/d. In 11 patients treated with concentrated etoposide phosphate, no local phlebitis was noted, but two patients did develop allergic phenomena. The conversion of etoposide phosphate to etoposide was not saturated in the dosages studied. Etoposide phosphate had peak plasma concentrations at 5 minutes, with a terminal half-life (t1/2) of 7 minutes. Etoposide reached peak concentrations at 7 to 8 minutes, with a t1/2 of 6 to 9 hours. Both etoposide phosphate and etoposide demonstrated dose-related linear increases in maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the curve (AUC)., Conclusion: Etoposide phosphate displays excellent patient tolerance in conventional dosages when administered as a 5-minute intravenous bolus. The suggested phase II dose is 150 mg/m2 on days 1, 3, and 5. The ability to administer etoposide phosphate as a concentrated, rapid infusion may prove of value both in the outpatient clinic and in high-dose regimens.

Background: Chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression often limits escalation of cancer chemotherapy doses. Cyclophosphamide, an alkylating agent, is an ideal candidate for dose escalation: A log-linear relationship between cell kill and dose has been demonstrated, and the drug spares hematopoietic stem cells. In addition, studies suggest that granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) can enhance the ability to achieve optimal dose intensity as well as ameliorating chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression., Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose and the toxic effects of cyclophosphamide administered every 2 weeks with GM-CSF support., Methods: For this trial by the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB), cohorts of patients were treated with cyclophosphamide as a 1-hour intravenous infusion every 14 days; GM-CSF was given subcutaneously on days 3-10. Four dose levels of cyclophosphamide (1.5, 3.0, 4.5, and 6.0 g/m2) and three dose levels of GM-CSF (2.5, 5.0, and 10.0 micrograms/kg per day) were evaluated. There was no dose escalation in individual patients. Fifty-one patients with solid tumors who had CALGB performance status 0 or 1 and minimal prior radiotherapy were eligible for analysis. Drug clearance and area under the curve for plasma drug concentration x time (AUC) were estimated at completion of the infusion and at 4 and 24 hours after the start of the infusion., Results: Ninety-five courses of therapy were analyzed. Treatment with cyclophosphamide at 3.0 g/m2 or more resulted in neutropenia (absolute neutrophil counts < 100/microL) in all cycles of therapy. At those doses, blood cell count recovery adequate for re-treatment occurred in 67%-85% of cycles (median, 16 days). Doses of 6.0 g/m2 were associated with the greatest degree of myelosuppression and frequent hospitalization (88% of cycles); requirements for blood transfusion prohibited further dose escalation. Nonhematologic toxic effects were tolerable, with two episodes of reversible cardiotoxicity and four episodes of hemorrhagic cystitis that precluded further therapy. Degree of myelosuppression was not correlated with cyclophosphamide AUC or clearance., Conclusions: The recommended phase II dose of cyclophosphamide is 4.5 g/m2 administered every 2 weeks with GM-CSF given at 5.0 micrograms/kg per day of GM-CSF. Our results suggest that, with GM-CSF support, high cumulative doses of cyclophosphamide can be given to achieve optimal dose intensity, with reproducible blood cell count recovery and without the need for autologous bone marrow transplantation., Implications: Phase II studies of this intensive regimen in malignant diseases sensitive to alkylating agents are currently being done in CALGB.

The vinca alkaloids remain among the most useful classes of anticancer agents used in the clinic today. However, previous analogs of these agents have not realized either increased safety or an enhanced antitumor spectrum. Currently, three derivatives are in clinical trial: vinorelbine, vintripol, and vinxaltine. Vinorelbine has shown consistent antitumor activity in patients with breast carcinoma and is in phase III trials in the United States, Europe, and Japan. Vintripol and vinxaltine, vinca alkaloids conjugated to amino acids, are in early clinical trials in Europe. The dose-limiting toxicity of these agents is leukopenia. A similar agent with a different chemical structure, rhizoxin, is in early phase II clinical trials with initial activity noted in breast carcinoma. The ultimate role of these agents in treatment of human malignancy awaits the results of ongoing studies.

The known pharmacokinetics of vinblastine sulfate given by intermittent bolus dictate alternate dose schedules for prolonging the therapeutic levels. Herein, we have tested a divided dose schedule which shows out-patient feasibility, manageable toxicity, and encouraging responses.

A comparative study evaluating home and hospital treatment for terminal cancer patients is reported. Home care was provided by a comprehensive home care program, the Don Monti Home Oncology Medical Extension (H.O.M.E.). A multispecialty team including an oncologist, oncology nurse, social worker, dietitian and technologist is transported to the home in a medically-equipped van to render treatment. Services provided include physical assessments, pain control, chemotherapy and transfusion administration, psychosocial support, nutrition education and bereavement counseling. Two-hundred eighteen patients were entered of which 174 were treated at home and 44 in the hospital. Patients were comparable in age, diagnosis, sites of metastases, prior treatment and Karnofsky status. Both groups received similar supportive care either at home or in the hospital. Cost analysis of home and hospital care revealed a per diem cost benefit of $256.00 for home treatment. Comprehensive home treatment provided by a multi-specialty team can deliver effective care with medical and financial benefits to terminal cancer patients.

Vinzolidine is a new, orally active, semisynthetic vinca alkaloid which shows broad anti-tumor activity against murine tumor test systems. This phase I study established a 1 day every 2 week schedule of 35 mg/m2 in good-risk patients and of 30 mg/m2 in poor-risk patients. Maximal tolerated dose was 45 mg/m2 with severe neutropenia, syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone, and paralytic ileus. Significant antitumor responses were seen in two patients with lymphoma and in one with squamous cell cancer of the lung.