Search

Background: This study was conducted to estimate the additional objective and perceived workload of nurses resulting from the use of webcams. The successful implementation of webcam technology into routine care requires an analysis to prevent adverse events of increased nursing workload. Methods: The study took place on three neonatal wards in two University Hospitals in Germany. In the first Hospital, the study was conducted from February to July 2021; in the second one it was conducted between June and November 2021. Data were collected using a combined approach of a standardised diary questionnaire study and passive observations. The participants were accompanied in their daily work and their activities were recorded 65 nurses participated. Results: 2,031 h were observed in 1,630 observation blocks. In 14.74% of the observation blocks webcam activities were detected. The extent to which the nurses had webcam-related additional workloads was rated as no additional workload in 82.16% of the daily questionnaires (n = 1,026). Conclusion: The observed low workload due to the webcams is in line with the nurses' perception. The observational data revealed, on a number of different analysis levels, that a limited additional workload was generated. There was no decrease in activity performance observed and no clear indication for interruptions due to the webcam-related activities for the nurses. However, it is important to raise awareness about the individual workload levels for the successful implementation. Additional education programs can be provided for nurses. Trial registration: The Neo-CamCare study is registered at the German Clinical Trials Register. DRKS-ID: DRKS00017755. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Faced by a severe shortage of nurses and increasing demand for care, hospitals need to optimally determine their staffing levels. Ideally, nurses should be staffed to those shifts where they generate the highest positive value for the quality of healthcare. This paper develops an approach that identifies the incremental benefit of staffing an additional nurse depending on the patient mix. Based on the reasoning that timely fulfillment of care demand is essential for the healthcare process and its quality in the critical care setting, we propose to measure the incremental benefit of staffing an additional nurse through reductions in time until care arrives (TUCA). We determine TUCA by relying on queuing theory and parametrize the model with real data collected through an observational study. The study indicates that using the TUCA concept and applying queuing theory at the care event level has the potential to improve quality of care for a given nurse capacity by efficiently trading situations of high versus low workload. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: This study analysed how nursing workloads in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) depended on the type of respiratory support provided, and how this relationship varied by the infant's postnatal age and weight.Methods: We used a prospective study design in a NICU in a tertiary perinatal centre in Germany. This entailed collecting data on nursing activities by observing 41 nurses for 155 hours between June 2015 and November 2015 and measuring the average nursing capacity required for direct care. Regression analysis was used to test for differences in nursing workloads between respiratory support types.Results: Mechanically ventilated infants each required an average of 60% of the time one nurse had available to spend on direct care during the periods observed. In contrast, those receiving noninvasive ventilation only required 34% and special care infants required 13%. After the first 72 hours of life, mechanically ventilated infants required an average nursing capacity of 40%, while infants receiving noninvasive ventilation required 32% and special care infants required 25%.Conclusion: Invasive support was associated with higher workloads than noninvasive support. The differences were partially moderated by individual factors, such as the infant's age. The findings should be replicated within a multicentre design. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim To investigate the drivers of perceived work intensity among neonatal intensive care unit nurses. Background The consequences of high work intensity have been studied extensively, yet setting-specific drivers have received less attention. Design Prospective, longitudinal and monocentric study design. Methods The study combined data from standardized diary surveys and passive observations of study nurses. Data were collected over a period of 6 months in 2015. We considered two scenarios: (1) the perception of normal work intensity relative to non-normal work intensity; and (2) the perception of high work intensity relative to non-high work intensity. Perceived work intensity was then analysed using mixed-effects probit regression models. Results We found that when direct and indirect care were provided more frequently than administrative and other duties were performed, the evaluated nurses perceived their work intensity to be higher. We also found that nurses who more frequently provided care for sick and preterm infants were less likely to perceive their work intensity as normal and this effect was stronger among nurses who cared for infants under mechanical ventilation than nurses who cared for infants receiving non-invasive respiratory support. Conclusion In the interest of both nurses and infants and the pursuit of a reduction in perceived work intensity and the provision of better neonatal care, caution must be applied when assigning infants to nurses. Further research is needed to validate these findings using a multicentre study design. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]