Search

To evaluate the diagnostic impact of point-of-care breast ultrasound by trained primary care physicians (PCPs) as part of a breast cancer detection program using clinical breast exam in an underserved region of Peru. Medical records and breast ultrasound images of symptomatic women presenting to the Breast Cancer Detection Model (BCDM) in Trujillo, Peru were collected from 2017–2018. Performance was measured against final outcomes derived from regional cancer center medical records, fine needle aspiration results, patient follow-up (sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values), and by percent agreement with the retrospective, blinded interpretation of images by a fellowship-trained breast radiologist, and a Peruvian breast surgeon. The diagnostic impact of ultrasound, compared to clinical breast exam (CBE), was calculated for actual practice and for potential impact of two alternative reporting systems. Of the 171 women presenting for breast ultrasound, 23 had breast cancer (13.5%). Breast ultrasound used as a triage test (current practice) detected all cancer cases (including four cancers missed on confirmatory CBE). PCPs showed strong agreement with radiologist and surgeon readings regarding the final management of masses (85.4% and 80.4%, respectively). While the triage system yielded a similar number of biopsies as CBE alone, using the condensed and full BI-RADS systems would have reduced biopsies by 60% while identifying 87% of cancers immediately and deferring 13% to six-month follow-up. Point-of-care ultrasound performed by trained PCPs improves diagnostic accuracy for managing symptomatic women over CBE alone and enhances access. Greater use of BI-RADS to guide management would reduce the diagnostic burden substantially. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Late-stage breast cancer detection should be something of the past; however, it is still all too common in low-resource areas, including Peru, where 57% of women diagnosed with cancer are diagnosed at stage III or IV disease. Early detection of breast cancer is feasible in low-resource semirural and rural areas where mammography is rarely accessible. Methods: PATH collaborated with Peruvian health institutions at local, regional, and national levels to design and implement a model of care for the early detection of breast cancer in Peru. The model includes training health promoters for community outreach, professional midwives in clinical breast exam, doctors to perform fine-needle aspiration biopsy sampling with ultrasound to triage, and patient navigators to ensure patients follow through with treatment. Results: In a northern region of Peru, 400 individuals, including health promoters, midwives, doctors, and volunteers, received early-detection training in two phases. In Peru, local health professionals continue to refine and improve methods and materials using locally available resources, and the Peruvian health information system now includes specific breast cancer detection categories. Despite challenges and limited resources, the model is effective, and partnership with government health administrations improves health systems and benefits the population. Conclusion: Given the absence of screening mammography, the public health challenge is to bring breast cancer early detection and diagnostic services closer to women's homes and to ensure appropriate follow-up and care. The model is eminently transferable with appropriate adaptation and should now be tested in other settings within and outside of Peru. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer among women in Latin America, yet many countries lack the capacity to provide early detection and diagnostic services. In Peru, mammograms are not readily available in secondary cities, and 57% of women who are diagnosed with BC are diagnosed with stage III and IV disease. To bring services to women in a northern region of Peru, PATH collaborated with Peruvian health institutions at the local, regional, and national levels to design and implement a strategic algorithm with which to increase the early detection of BC in the absence of mammography. Here, we evaluate the impact of training on the quality of clinical breast exam (CBE), ultrasound triage, and fine-needle aspiration (FNA) sampling and the reading of FNA biopsy for triage-positive women. Methods: Two hundred twenty-four midwives and 15 doctors were included in two-step training in Trujillo, Peru. CBE trainings were performed using anatomic models and patient exams in 2-day sessions. Team discussion with trainers was used to improve skills. Doctors' trainings for FNA sampling were led by two international expert pathologists in 2014 and by a Peruvian expert pathologist in 2016. Then in 2017, 43 pretraining and 50 post-training FNA biopsy samples were evaluated for adequacy and quality of diagnosis. Results: Since the trainings, 14,223 women have received CBE on an opportunistic basis. Midwives refer abnormal cases (n = 281) for follow-up. All doctors felt well trained for CBE and FNA, whereas five of 15 doctors perceived the need for additional ultrasound training. Quality assessment revealed that the adequacy of FNA samples improved from 26% pretraining to 37% post-training. Of the 43 FNA samples, a low concordance with reviewers was observed in the detection of suspicious/carcinoma (6.9% v 13.9%), whereas full concordance was observed after the training, although the numbers were small. Conclusion: In Peru, CBE remains an acceptable and feasible approach if complemented with ultrasound triage and FNA biopsy. Additional efforts are needed to increase coverage through a structured program. Training and continuous monitoring are essential for quality assurance. AUTHORS' DISCLOSURES OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: The following represents disclosure information provided by authors of this manuscript. All relationships are considered compensated. Relationships are self-held unless noted. I = Immediate Family Member, Inst = My Institution. Relationships may not relate to the subject matter of this manuscript. For more information about ASCO's conflict of interest policy, please refer to www.asco.org/rwc or ascopubs.org/jco/site/ifc. No COIs from the authors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]