Search

Objectives: The aim of the study was to examine of the intra-rater reliability of the chin tuck neck flexion (CTNF) test for assessing the endurance of neck flexors., Materials and Methods: The study was performed at the Cardiorespiratory laboratory of the Physiotherapy Department, School of Health and Caring Professions, TEI Lamia, Greece. Twenty healthy volunteers (males/females: 9/11, age: 22.2 ± 1.7 y ears) with no known musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, pulmonary, neurological, or psychiatric disorder were recruited. The participants were positioned in a supine position and were asked to raise their head 2.5 cm above the plinth and to maintain this position for as long as possible without losing craniocervical or cervical flexion. This test was repeated three times with 5-min intervals between the trials., Results: The results showed that this test could discriminate between neck flexor endurance in men and women. However, although the test seems to be highly reliable (ICC: 0.81-0.88), it presents unsatisfactory standard error of measurement (SEM: 10.7-14.7 s) and smallest detectable differences (SDD: 80.5-110.9%). Furthermore, subgroup analysis showed the test seems to be more reliable for women (ICC: 0.93-0.94) than for men (ICC: 0.68-0.8), but the SEM and SDD values for them remain unsatisfactory (SEM: 4.4-5.3 s, SDD: 57.5-63.99%)., Conclusions: Due to high reproducibility and discriminant validity, clinicians and researchers might want to consider using the CTNF test for the assessment of neck flexor endurance. However, they should seek alternative measurement tools when they want to avoid a large measurement error.

This paper describes a presumptive mechanism for the development of changes in respiratory function due to chronic neck pain. The patient with neck pain presents a number of factors that could constitute a predisposition of leading to a respiratory dysfunction: (a) the decreased strength of deep neck flexors and extensors, (b) the hyperactivity and increased fatigability of superficial neck flexors, (c) the limitation of range of motion, (d) the decrease in proprioception and disturbances in neuromuscular control, (e) the existence of pain and (f) the psychosocial influence of dysfunction. The possible connection of neck pain and respiratory function could have a great impact on various clinical aspects notably patient assessment, rehabilitation and pharmacological prescription.

Introduction: The repeatability of subjective and objective assessments of neck muscle fatigue is very important with regard to the clinical applicability of these methods., Method: To establish between-days reliability, 33 healthy volunteers performed a 60% maximum voluntary isometric contraction test from a standing position in all neck movements. Cervical muscle fatigue was assessed on three separate occasions from the spectral (median frequency, MF) and amplitude (root mean square, RMS) analysis of the electromyogram (EMG) signal recorded from the cervical paraspinal group, splenius capitis, levator scapulae and sternocleidomastoid. Subjective assessment of fatigue was rated by employing the Borg scale. Intraclass correlation coefficient ICC((1,1)), standard error of measurement (SEM), smallest detectable difference (SDD) indices and Pearson's correlation co-efficient were calculated for the analysis of the results., Results: Normalised median frequency (MF) slope had low repeatability and large between-day error (ICC((1,1))=0.28-0.61; SEM=0.33-0.60%/s; SDD=132.7-703.2%) for the protagonist muscles of each movement. Initial median frequency (IMF) had moderate to good reliability and small error (ICC((1,1))=0.64-0.81; SEM=2.8-8.8Hz; SDD=19.9-38.5%). The RMS slope yielded also poor repeatability. The Borg assessment was more reliable than the EMG estimate though variability between sessions was still quite high (SDD=29.2-136.5%). No correlation was found between the EMG and Borg assessment of neck muscle fatigue (r=-0.01-0.39)., Conclusion: The protocol used for assessing neck muscle fatigue proved to be reliable only for the IMF but the clinical usefulness of this measure remains questionable. The lack of correlation between objective and subjective estimation of neck muscle fatigue was possibly a consequence of the poor measurement repeatability. Further research is needed to identify the factors responsible for these results on neck area.

Objective: To evaluate the reproducibility of measurement for maximum voluntary isometric contractions of the cervical musculature in different movements., Design: Repeated test-retest measurements., Setting: A department of physiotherapy., Participants: Thirty-three healthy subjects (17 men, 16 women; age range, 19-63 y) for the intraexaminer study and 10 healthy subjects (4 men, 6 women; age range, 20-37 y) for the interexaminer study., Interventions: Maximum isometric strength in sitting and standing for flexion, extension, lateral flexion, and rotation using a custom isomyometer device. Three tests, performed 5 to 8 days apart, to assess intraexaminer reliability. Two examiners, each performing 1 trial, measuring on the same day to assess interexaminer reliability., Main Outcome Measures: Intraexaminer and interexaminer reliability of neck muscle strength., Results: The standing position showed better reproducibility than the sitting position. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC1,3) was above .84 for all tests in any movement and position and above .93 when the first test was excluded. The standard error (SE) of measurement (<16.5 N; <.13 N-m for rotation) and smallest detectable difference (SDD) (<20.1%) were also small. For interexaminer reliability, the ICC(2,1) ranged from.88 to.94 and the SE from 10.7 to 20.8 N (<1.15 N-m for rotation); the SDD was less than 29.8% (except right rotation, which was 38.8%)., Conclusions: A reliable protocol for measuring neck strength has been developed. Standing position and a full practice session produces more reliable measurements.

The author discusses the two most widely used and accepted tests to assess the endurance of deep neck flexors namely the chin tuck neck flexion test and the craniocervical flexion test. The chin tuck neck flexion test assesses short neck flexor muscle endurance and involves the patient lying in the supine position without the help of a pillow. The craniocervical flexion test is a highly reproducible test with satisfactory inter-rater and test-retest reliability and low measurement error.