Search

Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are often treated with high dose inhalations of beta 2-agonists. We compared domiciliary therapy with terbutaline administered by the Turbuhaler and by a jet nebulizer. Forty nebulizer users with severe COPD were included in the randomized, double-blind, cross-over study. Terbutaline was inhaled t.i.d. for 2 weeks as dry powder (5 doses = 2.5 mg) by Turbuhaler or as solution (2 ml = 5 mg) by jet nebulizer (Pari Inhalierboy). The mean age of the 25 completing patients was 66 years (range: 54-81), the mean FEV1 was 0.73 l or 29% of predicted (range: 11-55%). The period where the Turbuhaler delivered the active drug was preferred by 16 patients, the nebulizer period by seven (P = 0.09). The median score concerning feeling of control over the disease--according to the Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire--was better after the Turbuhaler period (P = 0.01). Other scores concerning disease related quality of life, the daily peak expiratory flow rates, the additional use of a metered dose inhaler were not significantly different for the two types of treatment. It is concluded that high dose domiciliary terbutaline treatment by Turbuhaler can replace nebulizer treatment in most patients with severe COPD.

The bronchodilating effect of terbutaline dry powder inhaled via Turbuhaler was compared with terbutaline inhaled via a conventional, chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) inhaler and Nebuhaler (750 ml spacer) in 68 consecutive patients attending the emergency department with acute severe bronchial obstruction. The study was of an open, randomized, parallel group design with one study day. Patients were treated with 2.5 mg of terbutaline 15 min apart, either as dry powder via Turbuhaler or with a CFC inhaler in conjunction with Nebuhaler. Data from 62 patients were analyzed. The mean baseline FEV1 values were 0.81 L (SD, 0.64; range, 0.14 to 2.74 L) in the Turbuhaler group (n = 33), and 0.90 L (SD, 0.90; range, 0.27 to 2.60 L) in the Nebuhaler group (n = 29). The mean increases in FEV1 from baseline were 0.40 L (SD, 0.40; range, 0.06 to 2.36 L) and 0.21 L (SD, 0.25; range, -0.05 to 0.95 L) 10 min after the last inhalation via Turbuhaler and Nebuhaler, respectively. The difference between mean values of the increase in FEV1 after terbutaline treatment with Turbuhaler and the CFC inhaler and Nebuhaler was statistically significant (p = 0.0004, ANOVA). This study showed that inhalation of terbutaline via Turbuhaler produced a significantly greater increase in FEV1 compared with the same dose of terbutaline administered via the CFC inhaler and Nebuhaler in patients attending the emergency department with acute severe bronchial obstruction.

A total of 140 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was included in this multicentre parallel group investigation with the object of assessing whether poor inhalation technique results in increased consumption of beta 2-agonist. On the basis of measurements of pulmonary function, the patients were stratified into two groups with good and poor inhalation techniques, respectively, and these were subdivided at random to inhalation of terbutaline via either a freon spray (aerosol) or Turbohaler (powder). During a period of four weeks the daily terbutaline consumption, the symptoms and pulmonary function were noted. Patients with poor inhalation technique did not have significantly increased terbutaline consumption. The consumption of terbutaline was independent of the method of administration. The Turbohaler was just as effective as the spray and the patients preferred this method, (p less than 0.05).