Search

Objective: Post-operative success and patient satisfaction were assessed following septoplasty for mild to severe anterior septal deviation., Methods: The study included patients with an anterior nasal septal deviation in the form of a 'C' shape and close to the nasal valve in the anterior septal area. Deviation severity was classified as severe (group 1), moderate (group 2) or mild (group 3). Open or closed septoplasty procedures were performed. All patients were surveyed twice using the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation scale and the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey., Results: The mean Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation score for group 1 was 15.58 ± 2.34 prior to surgery and 6.61 ± 3.29 following surgery. The corresponding pre- and post-surgery scores in group 2 were 11.9 ± 2.82 and 6.3 ± 3.03, respectively. In group 3, these values were 8.28 ± 2.63 and 7.12 ± 3.18, respectively. The mean 36-Item Short Form Health Survey physical function value for groups 1 and 2 increased after surgery; in group 3, this value decreased after surgery, but the result was not statistically significant., Conclusion: Septoplasty is very successful for treating moderate or advanced deviations, but great care should be taken when employing septoplasty for mild deviations.

Objectives: The effects of different climatic conditions on the quality of life (QoL) of patients following septoplasty or septorhinoplasty were investigated., Methods: A total of 89 patients (47 males and 42 females) underwent either septoplasty or septorhinoplasty during the summer (summer group, n = 42) or winter (winter group, n = 47) season. To assess QoL, SinoNasal Outcome Test (SNOT)-22, Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale, and Visual Analogue Scale were used. Postoperative (PO) pain, bleeding, and symptoms related to nasal packing (eating and sleep problems) were also evaluated., Results: PO pain scores were lower in the winter group than that in the summer group (p<0.05). After pack removal, there was a slight serohemorrhagic nasal discharge in 2.1% of the patients in the winter group, but no patient required intervention. Slight leakage was detected in 47.6% of the patients and 2.4% of the patients called for intervention (p<0.05) in the summer group. The SNOT-22 values did not differ between the groups (p>0.05). NOSE scores in the winter group were higher than that in the summer group (p<0.05). In each group, SNOT-22 (p adjusted <0.175) and NOSE scores (p<0.05) were lower at 1 month after surgery. The winter group patients rated headache, facial pain, and nasal crusting higher than those in the summer group did (p<0.05). However, nasal discharge and loss of smell were less troubling in the summer group than that in the winter group (p<0.05)., Conclusion: Regardless of climate or season, septoplasty or septorhinoplasty increases patients' QoL. However, problematic PO bleeding was detected at a higher frequency in patients who underwent surgery in summer. The advantage of surgery in winter is that it leads to less frequent problematic bleeding PO., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None of the authors declare any conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)