Search

There is growing evidence that neurogenic inflammation contributes to the pathophysiology of upper airway diseases, with nasal hyperreactivity (NHR) being a key symptom. The rare neuroendocrine cells (NECs) in the epithelium have been linked to the pathophysiology of bronchial and intestinal hyperreactivity, however their presence in the nasal mucosa and their potential role in NHR remains unclear. Therefore, we studied the presence of NECs in the nasal epithelium of controls, allergic rhinitis patients and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps patients, and their link to NHR. The expression of typical NECs markers, CHGA, ASCL1 and CGRP, were evaluated on gene and protein level in human samples using real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR), western blot, immunohistochemistry fluorescence staining, RNA scope assay, flow cytometry and single cell RNA-sequencing. Furthermore, the change in peak nasal inspiratory flow after cold dry air provocation and visual analogue scale scores were used to evaluate NHR or disease severity, respectively. Limited gene expression of the NECs markers CHGA and ASCL1 was measured in patients with upper airway diseases and controls. Gene expression of these markers did not correlate with NHR severity nor disease severity. In vitro , CHGA and ASCL1 expression was also evaluated in primary nasal epithelial cell cultures from patients with upper airway disease and controls using RT-qPCR and western blot. Both on gene and protein level only limited CHGA and ASCL1 expression was found. Additionally, NECs were studied in nasal biopsies of patients with upper airway diseases and controls using immunohistochemistry fluorescence staining, RNA scope and flow cytometry. Unlike in ileum samples, CHGA could not be detected in nasal biopsies of patients with upper airway diseases and control subjects. Lastly, single cell RNA-sequencing of upper airway tissue could not identify a NEC cluster. In summary, in contrast to the bronchi and gut, there is only limited evidence for the presence of NECs in the nasal mucosa, and without correlation with NHR, thereby questioning the relevance of NECs in upper airway pathology., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wils, Backaert, Jacobs, Ruysseveldt, Cremer, Dilissen, Bullens, Talavera, Steelant, Van Gerven, Martens and Hellings.)

Although nasal hyperreactivity (NHR) is a common feature in patients suffering from allergic and nonallergic rhinitis, it is widely neglected during history taking, underdiagnosed in the majority of patients with rhinitis and rhinosinusitis, not considered as an outcome parameter in clinical trials on novel treatments for rhinitis and rhinosinusitis, and no target for routine treatment. In contrast to the simple nature of diagnosing NHR by a history of nasal symptoms induced by nonspecific exogenous and/or endogenous triggers, quantification is hardly performed in routine clinic given the lack of a simple tool for its diagnosis. So far, limited efforts have been invested into gaining better insight in the underlying pathophysiology of NHR, helping us to explain why some patients with inflammation develop NHR and others not. Of note, environmental and microbial factors have been reported to influence NHR, contributing to the complex nature of understanding the development of NHR. As a consequence of the neglect of NHR as a key clinical feature of rhinitis and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), patients with NHR might be suboptimally controlled and/or dissatisfied with current treatment. We here aim to provide a comprehensive overview of current knowledge on the pathophysiology, and the available tools to diagnose and treat NHR., (© 2018 EAACI and John Wiley and Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd.)

Background: Nasal hyperreactivity (NHR) is an important clinical feature of allergic rhinitis (AR). The efficacy of MP29-02 (azelastine hydrochloride (AZE) and fluticasone propionate [FP]) nasal spray on local inflammatory mediators and NHR in AR is unknown. We tested if MP29-02 decreases inflammatory mediators and NHR in AR and if this effect is due to restoration of nasal epithelial barrier function., Methods: A 4-week double-blinded placebo-controlled trial with MP29-02 treatment was conducted in 28 patients with house dust mite (HDM) AR. The presence of NHR was evaluated by measuring reduction in nasal flow upon cold dry air exposure. The effects of AZE ± FP on barrier integrity and airway inflammation were studied in a murine model of HDM-induced NHR and on reduced activation of murine sensory neurons and human mast cells., Results: MP29-02 but not placebo reduced NHR (P < .0001 vs P = .21), levels of substance P (P = .026 vs P = .941), and β-hexosaminidase (P = .036 vs P = .632) in human nasal secretions. In wild-type C57BL6 mice, the reduction in β-hexosaminidase levels (P < .0001) by AZE + FP treatment upon HDM challenge was found in parallel with a decreased transmucosal passage (P = .0012) and completely reversed eosinophilic inflammation (P = .0013). In vitro, repeated applications of AZE + FP desensitized sensory neurons expressing the transient receptor potential channels TRPA1 and TRPV1. AZE + FP reduced MC degranulation to the same extent as AZE alone., Conclusion: MP29-02 treatment reduces inflammatory mediators and NHR in AR. The effects of AZE + FP on MC degranulation, nasal epithelial barrier integrity, and TRP channels provide novel insights into the pathophysiology of allergic rhinitis., (© 2017 EAACI and John Wiley and Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd.)

Background: Allergic rhinitis (AR) is characterized by mucosal inflammation, driven by activated immune cells. Mast cells and T H 2 cells might decrease epithelial barrier integrity in AR, maintaining a leaky epithelial barrier., Objective: We sought to investigate the role of histamine and T H 2 cells in driving epithelial barrier dysfunction in AR., Methods: Air-liquid interface cultures of primary nasal epithelial cells were used to measure transepithelial electrical resistance, paracellular flux of fluorescein isothiocyanate-dextran 4 kDa, and mRNA expression of tight junctions. Nasal secretions were collected from healthy control subjects, AR patients, and idiopathic rhinitis patients and were tested in vitro. In addition, the effect of activated T H 1 and T H 2 cells, mast cells, and neurons was tested in vitro. The effect of IL-4, IL-13, IFN-γ, and TNF-α on mucosal permeability was tested in vivo., Results: Histamine as well as nasal secretions of AR but not idiopathic rhinitis patients rapidly decreased epithelial barrier integrity in vitro. Pretreatment with histamine receptor-1 antagonist, azelastine prevented the early effect of nasal secretions of AR patients on epithelial integrity. Supernatant of activated T H 1 and T H 2 cells impaired epithelial integrity, while treatment with anti-TNF-α or anti-IL-4Rα monoclonal antibodies restored the T H 1- and T H 2-induced epithelial barrier dysfunction, respectively. IL-4, IFN-γ, and TNF-α enhanced mucosal permeability in mice. Antagonizing IL-4 prevented mucosal barrier disruption and tight junction downregulation in a mouse model of house dust mite allergic airway inflammation., Conclusions: Our data indicate a key role for allergic inflammatory mediators in modulating nasal epithelial barrier integrity in the pathophysiology in AR., (Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Literature is convincing regarding the efficacy of capsaicin nasal treatment in idiopathic rhinitis (IR). However, up to 50% of IR patients do not meet the strict inclusion criteria of the trials conducted so far. As a consequence, the efficacy of capsaicin is unknown in a significant number of IR patients that do not meet the strict inclusion/exclusion criteria (J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;133:1332, J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017; [Epub ahead of print]). "Mixed rhinitis" (MR) patients have more than one major etiologic factor involved in the mucosal pathology. We have no idea about the efficacy of capsaicin nasal spray in these patients nor about the time interval to seek a second application. We report here that capsaicin nasal spray is effective in a broader group of IR than the purely selected ones described before, that subjective nasal hyper-reactivity is a good predictor of positive outcome, and that the time interval for seeking a second treatment is likely to be shorter in MR patients than in the strictly selected IR patients., (© 2017 EAACI and John Wiley and Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd.)

This EAACI position paper aims at providing a state-of-the-art overview on nonallergic rhinitis (NAR). A significant number of patients suffering from persistent rhinitis are defined as nonallergic noninfectious rhinitis (NANIR) patients, often denominated in short as having NAR. NAR is defined as a symptomatic inflammation of the nasal mucosa with the presence of a minimum of two nasal symptoms such as nasal obstruction, rhinorrhea, sneezing, and/or itchy nose, without clinical evidence of endonasal infection and without systemic signs of sensitization to inhalant allergens. Symptoms of NAR may have a wide range of severity and be either continuously present and/or induced by exposure to unspecific triggers, also called nasal hyperresponsiveness (NHR). NHR represents a clinical feature of both AR and NAR patients. NAR involves different subgroups: drug-induced rhinitis, (nonallergic) occupational rhinitis, hormonal rhinitis (including pregnancy rhinitis), gustatory rhinitis, senile rhinitis, and idiopathic rhinitis (IR). NAR should be distinguished from those rhinitis patients with an allergic reaction confined to the nasal mucosa, also called "entopy" or local allergic rhinitis (LAR). We here provide an overview of the current consensus on phenotypes of NAR, recommendations for diagnosis, a treatment algorithm, and defining the unmet needs in this neglected area of research., (© 2017 EAACI and John Wiley and Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd.)

Background: Tight junction (TJ) defects have recently been associated with asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis. The expression, function, and regulation of nasal epithelial TJs remain unknown in patients with allergic rhinitis (AR)., Objective: We investigated the expression, function, and regulation of TJs in the nasal epithelium of patients with house dust mite (HDM)-induced AR and in an HDM-induced murine model of allergic airway disease., Methods: Air-liquid interface cultures of primary nasal epithelial cells of control subjects and patients with HDM-induced AR were used for measuring transepithelial resistance and passage to fluorescein isothiocyanate-dextran 4 kDa (FD4). Ex vivo transtissue resistance and FD4 permeability of nasal mucosal explants were measured. TJ expression was evaluated by using real-time quantitative PCR and immunofluorescence. In addition, the effects of IL-4, IFN-γ, and fluticasone propionate (FP) on nasal epithelial cells were investigated in vitro. An HDM murine model was used to study the effects of allergic inflammation and FP treatment on transmucosal passage of FD4 in vivo., Results: A decreased resistance in vitro and ex vivo was found in patients with HDM-induced AR, with increased FD4 permeability and reduced occludin and zonula occludens-1 expression. AR symptoms correlated inversely with resistance in patients with HDM-induced AR. In vitro IL-4 decreased transepithelial resistance and increased FD4 permeability, whereas IFN-γ had no effect. FP prevented IL-4-induced barrier dysfunction in vitro. In an HDM murine model FP prevented the allergen-induced increased mucosal permeability., Conclusion: We found impaired nasal epithelial barrier function in patients with HDM-induced AR, with lower occludin and zonula occludens-1 expression. IL-4 disrupted epithelial integrity in vitro, and FP restored barrier function. Better understanding of nasal barrier regulation might lead to a better understanding and treatment of AR., (Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Idiopathic rhinitis (IR) is a prevalent condition for which capsaicin nasal spray is the most effective treatment. However, the mechanisms underlying IR and the therapeutic action of capsaicin remain unknown., Objective: We sought to investigate the molecular and cellular bases of IR and the therapeutic action of capsaicin., Methods: Fourteen patients with IR and 12 healthy control subjects (HCs) were treated with intranasal capsaicin. The therapeutic effect was assessed in patients with IR by using visual analog scale and therapeutic response evaluation scores, and nasal hyperreactivity was evaluated by means of cold dry air provocation. Nasal samples served to measure the levels of neuromediators and expression of chemosensory cation channels, protein gene product 9.5 (PGP 9.5), and the mast cell marker c-kit. The effects of capsaicin were also tested in vitro on human nasal epithelial cells and mast cells., Results: Patients with IR had higher baseline transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily V, receptor 1 (TRPV1) expression in the nasal mucosa and higher concentrations of substance P (SP) in nasal secretions than HCs. Symptomatic relief was observed in 11 of 14 patients with IR after capsaicin treatment. Expression of TRPV1; transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily M, receptor 8 (TRPM8); and PGP 9.5 was only reduced in patients with IR after capsaicin treatment. Capsaicin did not alter c-KIT expression or nasal epithelial morphology in patients with IR and HCs nor did it induce apoptosis or necrosis in cultured human nasal epithelial cells and mast cells., Conclusion: IR features an overexpression of TRPV1 in the nasal mucosa and increased SP levels in nasal secretions. Capsaicin exerts its therapeutic action by ablating the TRPV1-SP nociceptive signaling pathway in the nasal mucosa., (Copyright © 2013 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Non-allergic rhinitis (NAR) is a common disorder, which can be defined as chronic nasal inflammation, independent of systemic IgE-mediated mechanisms. Symptoms of NAR patients mimic those of allergic rhinitis (AR) patients. However, AR patients can easily be diagnosed with skin prick test or allergen-specific IgE measurements in the serum, whereas NAR patients form a heterogeneous group and are difficult to diagnose because of an extensive list of different phenotypes, all varying in severity, underlying etiology and type of inflammation. Characterization of those phenotypes, mechanisms and management of NAR represents one of the major unmet needs in the field of allergic and non-allergic diseases. This review aims at providing a comprehensive overview of the state of the art in classifying the NAR patients and focuses on the neuro-immune mechanisms involved in allergic and non-allergic rhinitis, including reflections on the pathophysiology and the currently available treatment options.