Search

Air conditioning is a dual heat and mass transfer process, and the human nasal cavity achieves this through the mucosal wall surface, which is supplied with an energy source through the sub-epithelial network of capillaries. Computational studies of air conditioning in the nasal cavity have included temperature and humidity, but most studies solved these flow parameters separately, and in some cases, a constant mucosal surface temperature was used. Recent developments demonstrated that both heat and mass transfer need to be modeled. This work expands on existing modeling efforts in accounting for the nasal cavity's dual heat and mass transfer process by introducing a new subwall model, given in the Supplementary Materials. The model was applied to a pipe geometry, and a human nasal cavity was recreated from CT-scans, and six inhalation conditions were studied. The results showed that when the energy transfer from the latent heat of evaporation is included, there is a cooling effect on the mucosal surface temperature., (© 2022 The Authors. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Nasal saline irrigation is frequently utilised in rhinosinusitis management, and after nasal and sinus surgery. Nasal saline irrigation improves mucociliary transport and assists inflammatory mediator and post-surgical debris removal. The aim of this study was to assess the influence different head positions, irrigation inflow nostril, and the nasal cycle have on Neti pot nasal saline volume filling within the nasal passages and maxillary sinuses. Computational fluid dynamics modelling using anatomically correct nasal geometry found only minor difference in nasal cavity volume filling with inflow from either side of the nose however both head position and inflow direction were both found to have a major influence on maxillary sinus volume filling. Computational modelling flow velocity results at the nasopharynx were validated using particle image velocimetry. It was also found that directing irrigation inflow into the patent side of the nose while in the head-back position achieved the highest volume filling of both maxillary sinuses., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Nasal saline irrigation is frequently utilised in allergic rhinitis and rhinosinusitis management, and after nasal and sinus surgery. Anatomical modelling, clinical and computational studies guide treatment optimisation. This review offers a comprehensive summary of the modelling methodologies used in previous nasal irrigation studies by undertaking a systematic analysis of anatomical, clinical and computational investigations that assessed nasal saline irrigation using Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Review databases. Both procedural and assessment methods were reviewed. It was found that all twenty-four publications reviewed did not discuss the influence of the nasal cycle on internasal geometry and nasal resistance. Cadaver studies misrepresent in vivo nasal geometry. Irrigation pressure and shear forces, which could influence mucociliary transport and postoperative cleaning, were not evaluated. Previous studies focus on irrigation coverage and have not considered the nasal cycle which influences unilateral nasal resistance and thus pressure/ flow relationships and may also increase nasal air-locking. New computational fluid dynamic models could better inform nasal irrigation clinical practice., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None of the authors have conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)