Search

Genetic testing is considered the only reliable diagnostic approach in myotonic dystrophy. However it has recently been reported that a considerable number of patients with genetically proven types of the disease have unusual phenotypic presentation. The aim of our study was to evaluate motor unit reorganization reflected by various electrophysiological abnormalities in myotonic dystrophies and to compare findings between type 1 (DM 1) and type 2 myotonic dystrophy (DM2). Quantitative electromyography (EMG) recordings in 63 patients (33 with DM1 and 30 with DM2) from the biceps brachii (BB), rectus femoris (RF), first dorsal interosseus (FDI), and tibialis anterior (TA) muscles were analyzed. Mean amplitude and size index (SI) of motor unit potentials recorded in TA and RF muscles, mean potential duration in TA, and mean SI and the number of outliers with amplitude above the normal range in BB were significantly increased in DM2 as compared to DM1. Myotonic discharges were recorded more frequently in DM1 than in DM2. EMG findings significantly differ between DM1 and DM2. The presence of high amplitude potentials in lower limb muscles in DM2 patients, atypical for myogenic muscle lesions, could be explained by muscle fiber hypertrophy observed in muscle biopsies., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Standard electromyography (EMG) is useful in the diagnosis of myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) and type 2 (DM2), but it does not differentiate between them. The aim of this study was to estimate the utility of the short exercise test (SET) and short exercise test with cooling (SETC) in differentiating between DM1 and DM2., Methods: SET and SETC were performed in 32 patients with DM1 (mean age 35.8 ± 12.7 years) and 28 patients with DM2 (mean age 44.5 ± 12.5 years)., Results: We observed a significant decline in compound motor action potential (CMAP) amplitude in DM1 with both SET and SETC immediately after effort. In DM2, there was no marked change in CMAP amplitude with either SET or SETC., Conclusions: SET and SETC may serve as useful tools for clinical differentiation between DM1 and DM2, and they may be used as a guide for molecular testing., (Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Objective: To develop RNA splicing biomarkers of disease severity and therapeutic response in myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) and type 2 (DM2)., Methods: In a discovery cohort, we used microarrays to perform global analysis of alternative splicing in DM1 and DM2. The newly identified splicing changes were combined with previous data to create a panel of 50 putative splicing defects. In a validation cohort of 50 DM1 subjects, we measured the strength of ankle dorsiflexion (ADF) and then obtained a needle biopsy of tibialis anterior (TA) to analyze splice events in muscle RNA. The specificity of DM-associated splicing defects was assessed in disease controls. The CTG expansion size in muscle tissue was determined by Southern blot. The reversibility of splicing defects was assessed in transgenic mice by using antisense oligonucleotides to reduce levels of toxic RNA., Results: Forty-two splicing defects were confirmed in TA muscle in the validation cohort. Among these, 20 events showed graded changes that correlated with ADF weakness. Five other splice events were strongly affected in DM1 subjects with normal ADF strength. Comparison to disease controls and mouse models indicated that splicing changes were DM-specific, mainly attributable to MBNL1 sequestration, and reversible in mice by targeted knockdown of toxic RNA. Splicing defects and weakness were not correlated with CTG expansion size in muscle tissue., Interpretation: Alternative splicing changes in skeletal muscle may serve as biomarkers of disease severity and therapeutic response in myotonic dystrophy., (© 2013 American Neurological Association.)

Summary: Myotonic dystrophy is classified as one of the myotonic syndromes although myotonia is only a minor characteristic of it. It is, in fact, also a multisystem disease with cardiac, digestive, ocular, and endocrine abnormalities. Two subgroups are currently identified with many similarities: DM1 refers to classic dystrophia myotonica (Steinert disease), while DM2, formerly called proximal myotonic myopathy has a later onset. The congenital form is present only in DM1. The genetic causes of DM1 and 2 are different but end up in a similar way of altering RNAm processing and splicing of other genes. The anesthetic risk is increased in case of DM1 type. This review summarizes current knowledge concerning the pathophysiology and anesthetic management of this disease in children and adults., (© 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Myotonic dystrophy is the most common type of muscular dystrophy in adults and is characterised by progressive myopathy, myotonia, and multiorgan involvement. Two genetically distinct entities have been identified. Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (also known as Steinert's disease) was first described more than 100 years ago, whereas myotonic dystrophy type 2 was identified only 18 years ago, after genetic testing for type 1 disease could be applied. Both diseases are caused by autosomal dominant nucleotide repeat expansions. In patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1, a (CTG)(n) expansion is present in DMPK, whereas in patients with type 2 disease, there is a (CCTG)(n) expansion in CNBP. When transcribed into CUG-containing RNA, mutant transcripts aggregate as nuclear foci that sequester RNA-binding proteins, resulting in a spliceopathy of downstream effector genes. The prevailing paradigm therefore is that both disorders are toxic RNA diseases. However, research indicates several additional pathogenic effects take place with respect to protein translation and turnover. Despite clinical and genetic similarities, myotonic dystrophy type 1 and type 2 are distinct disorders requiring different diagnostic and management strategies., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Myotonic dystrophy type 1 and type 2 (DM1 and DM2) are genetic diseases in which mutant transcripts containing expanded CUG or CCUG repeats cause cellular dysfunction by altering the processing or metabolism of specific mRNAs and miRNAs. The toxic effects of mutant RNA are mediated partly through effects on proteins that regulate alternative splicing. Here we show that alternative splicing of exon 29 (E29) of Ca(V)1.1, a calcium channel that controls skeletal muscle excitation-contraction coupling, is markedly repressed in DM1 and DM2. The extent of E29 skipping correlated with severity of weakness in tibialis anterior muscle of DM1 patients. Two splicing factors previously implicated in DM1, MBNL1 and CUGBP1, participated in the regulation of E29 splicing. In muscle fibers of wild-type mice, the Ca(V)1.1 channel conductance and voltage sensitivity were increased by splice-shifting oligonucleotides that induce E29 skipping. In contrast to human DM1, expression of CUG-expanded RNA caused only a modest increase in E29 skipping in mice. However, forced skipping of E29 in these mice, to levels approaching those observed in human DM1, aggravated the muscle pathology as evidenced by increased central nucleation. Together, these results indicate that DM-associated splicing defects alter Ca(V)1.1 function, with potential for exacerbation of myopathy.

The purpose of this study was to describe the frequency of absent, unrecognized, or minimal myotonic discharges (MDs) in myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2). We performed a retrospective review of needle electromyography (EMG) data prior to genetic diagnosis in 49 DM2 patients at the Mayo Clinic. MDs were not reported on first or repeat EMG studies (n = 8) and not found in archived recordings of 4 patients (8%); archived EMG recordings (n = 4) confirmed the absence of MDs (n = 2), including 1 patient with normal insertional activity in all muscles, and misinterpretation of MDs as slow fibrillation potentials (n = 1) and complex repetitive discharge (CRD) activity (n = 1). Eight (16%) patients had minimal classic MDs with diffusely increased insertional activity, including waning-only MDs in all patients in this group with archived EMG recordings (n = 5). Diffuse MDs were found in 33 (67%) patients. Absent or minimal MDs do not exclude DM2. Over-reliance on diffuse MDs in patients who present with myopathy may lead to delay in genetic diagnosis of DM2.

A previous study in proximal myotonic myopathy (PROMM/DM-2) and myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM-1) using brain positron emission tomography demonstrated a reduced cerebral blood flow in the frontal and temporal regions associated with cognitive impairment. The objective was to investigate further cognitive and behavioural aspects in a new series of patients with DM-1 and PROMM/DM-2. Nineteen patients with genetically determined PROMM/DM-2 and 21 patients with moderately severe DM-1 underwent neuropsychological testing and neuropsychiatric interviews. DM-1 and PROMM/DM-2 patients had significantly lower scores on tests of frontal lobe function compared to controls. Neuropsychiatric interviews demonstrated an avoidant trait personality disorder in both patient groups. Brain single photon emission computed tomography showed frontal and parieto-occipital hypoperfusion. The results suggest that there is a specific cognitive and behavioural profile in PROMM/DM-2 and in DM-1, and that this profile is associated with hypoperfusion in frontal and parieto-occipital regions of the brain.

Myotonic dystrophy (DM1) and proximal myotonic myopathy (PROMM or DM2) are two distinct muscular disorders with multisystemic involvement. Both have previously been reported to be associated with cognitive impairment and white matter lesions detected by cerebral magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In this study, the extent of brain atrophy was investigated in vivo in ten DM1 and nine PROMM patients in comparison to age-matched healthy controls for each group. The diagnosis was confirmed by DNA analysis of all patients. As a quantitative marker, the ratio of brain parenchymal to intracranial volume, called brain parenchymal fraction (BPF), was calculated from 3-dimensional MRI data using an automated analysis technique. Compared to age-matched healthy controls (mean BPF 0.852 +/- 0.032), the BPF in DM1 patients (0.713 +/- 0.031) was highly significantly decreased (P < 0.001). In contrast, the PROMM patients (mean BPF 0.792 +/- 0.029) showed only slightly decreased BPF values (P < 0.05). BPF was not significantly correlated to any of the clinical or genetic parameters in both diseases (disease duration, motor score, educational level, and number of CTG repeats in the expanded allele). In summary, global brain atrophy was demonstrated to occur in both diseases, but was more severely manifestated in DM1 patients.

Background: Proximal myotonic myopathy is an autosomal dominant multisystem disorder with a recently defined CCTG expansion on chromosome 3 in the major subgroup (myotonic dystrophy type 2). Cardiac rhythm disturbances have been described in patients with this disease, but it is not known whether myotonic dystrophy type 2/proximal myotonic myopathy patients suffer from dysautonomia and whether cardiac arrhythmias relate to autonomic dysfunction., Objectives: To investigate cardiovascular autonomic function in myotonic dystrophy type 2/proximal myotonic myopathy patients with and without cardiac arrhythmias., Patients and Methods: Standard autonomic function tests (heart rate responses to Valsalva manoeuvre, deep breathing and active change of posture, and blood pressure responses to active change of posture and sustained handgrip), resting heart rate variability in the time- and frequency-domain, and the corrected QT interval length were determined in 16 patients with genetically defined myotonic dystrophy type 2/proximal myotonic myopathy and compared to the results obtained in 16 age- and sex-matched healthy control subjects., Results: Standard autonomic tests yielded similar results in both groups. Measures of heart rate variability tended to be lower in myotonic dystrophy type 2/proximal myotonic myopathy patients compared to healthy controls, but reached statistical significance only for the number of R-R intervals exceeding 50 ms (p50) and the power spectrum density in the low-frequency range (low-frequency power). Four patients (25%) suffered from mild cardiac rhythm disturbances encompassing paroxysmal tachycardia, sinoatrial block, right bundle branch block, ventricular premature beats and bradycardia. The autonomic responses of these patients were essentially similar compared to those without cardiac arrhythmias, apart from a decreased heart rate response to deep breathing in the patients with cardiac arrhythmias., Conclusions: We found no major abnormalities of cardiovascular autonomic function in patients with myotonic dystrophy type 2/proximal myotonic myopathy, neither in the whole study group nor in the subgroup of patients with cardiac rhythm abnormalities.

Purpose of Review: To highlight recent advances in understanding the clinical manifestations and molecular genetics of myotonic syndromes, with particular emphasis on the myotonic dystrophies., Recent Findings: Myotonic syndromes include the non-dystrophic myotonias, caused by mutations in genes encoding the chloride or sodium channels that are specific to skeletal muscle, and the myotonic dystrophies. Previous studies have shown that myotonic dystrophy type 1 is caused by the expansion of a CTG repeat in the gene. Recently, it was discovered that myotonic dystrophy type 2 (proximal myotonic myopathy) is also caused by a DNA expansion mutation. In both types of myotonic dystrophy the expanded repeat is transcribed and the RNA produced from the mutant allele is retained in nuclear inclusions. Recent studies suggest that the mutant RNA has a toxic effect on muscle fibers by interfering with the essential functions of the myonucleus, such as RNA processing., Summary: It now appears likely that myotonic dystrophy is the first instance of a genetic disease in which the harmful effect of a mutation involves the production of a pathogenic RNA. However, the exact mechanism is not understood, and it is unclear whether this RNA-mediated disease process is also responsible for the manifestations of myotonic dystrophy in non-muscle tissues.

Cardiac involvement in myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) is well known. In contrast, the severity and frequency of cardiac abnormalities in proximal myotonic myopathy (PROMM) are still unclear. To identify similarities and differences in the rate of progression of muscle weakness and cardiac disturbances in these two disorders, 16 patients with PROMM (3q-unlinked PROMM: n=10; uniformative for linkage: n=6) were compared to 33 patients with moderately severe myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1). There was no significant difference in disease duration between PROMM and DM1. Patients underwent serial manual muscle strength testing, EKG, 24-h Holter monitoring, 2D-echocardiography. Muscle weakness progressed slowly in both groups. Most DM1 patients developed conduction defects. No significant atrioventricular disturbances on initial and follow-up examinations were found in PROMM patients. One patient developed right bundle branch block. Many families with PROMM appear to have more benign cardiac manifestations and less severe prognosis compared to DM1. Further studies of subgroups of PROMM (linked to the 3q21 locus and without linkage) are necessary to determine whether the cardiac conduction disturbances are more common in a specific genotype of PROMM.