Search

Introduction: Anti-synthetase syndrome (ASS) is a rare autoimmune disease characterized by the presence of anti-aminoacyl-transfer-RNA synthetase antibodies (ARS) and the involvement of muscles, skin, joints, and lungs. Despite increasing interest and evidence, optimal clinical management remains unclear due to a lack of randomized control trials. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a treatment regimen involving early co-administration of glucocorticoids and immunosuppressants, with rapid prednisone tapering., Materials and Methods: We prospectively enrolled patients referred to our multidisciplinary "Myositis Clinic" with a diagnosis of ASS. Clinical, serological, instrumental and medications data were collected at baseline and at 6 and 12 months follow-up. According to treatment protocol, patients were treated with traditional synthetic immunosuppressants or rituximab (RTX) depending on clinical manifestations. Prednisone (PDN) was gradually tapered and eventually discontinued within 6 or 12 months., Results: A total of twenty-seven subjects were enrolled: arthritis, myositis and ILD were assessed in 9, 16 and 18 patients, respectively, and all of them had an active disease. RTX was administered after methotrexate (MTX) in 4 cases of refractory joint involvement and co-administration of a second immunosuppressant was necessary in 2 patients. When muscle involvement was present, first-line therapy was MTX, followed by mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or RTX, which allowed to achieve low disease activity or remission, respectively. Eight ILD-patients were treated with MMF and switched to RTX in 5 cases of inefficacy, but all patients were in clinical remission at the end of follow-up. At 12 months, 12 patients discontinued PDN., Conclusions: This study is the first to prospectively report on the efficacy and safety of a stepwise, steroid-sparing treatment ASS encompassing various domains. MTX, as well as other synthetic immunosuppressants, showed limited efficacy in ASS-related arthritis, while RTX emerged as a promising option. This study recommends early RTX use in case of arthritis, suggesting it as a pivotal treatment for ILD too, and raises questions regarding maintenance therapy and treatment-free remission., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Rituximab (RTX) is an anti-CD20 chimeric monoclonal antibody recommended as off-label treatment in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM). The present study aimed to evaluate changes in immunoglobulin (Ig) levels during RTX-treatment and their potential association with infections in a cohort of IIM patients., Methods: Patients evaluated in the Myositis clinic belonging to the Rheumatology Units of Siena, Bari and Palermo University Hospitals, and treated for the first time with RTX were enrolled. Demographic, clinical, laboratory and treatment variables, including previous and concomitant immunosuppressive drugs and glucocorticoid (GC) dosage were analysed before (T0) and after 6 (T1) and 12 (T2) months of RTX treatment., Results: Thirty patients (median age, IQR 56 (42-66); 22 female) were selected. During the observational period, low levels of IgG (<700 mg/dl) and IgM (<40 mg/dl) occurred in 10% and 17% of patients, respectively. However, no one showed severe (IgG<400 mg/dl) hypogammaglobulinaemia. IgA concentrations were lower at T1 than T0 (p=0.0218), while IgG concentrations were lower at T2 compared to those at baseline (p=0.0335). IgM concentrations were lower at T1 and T2 than T0 (p<0.0001), as well at T2 than T1 (p=0.0215). Three patients suffered major infections, two others had paucisymptomatic COVID-19, one suffered from mild zoster. GC dosages at T0 were inversely correlated with IgA T0 concentrations (p=0.004, r=- 0.514). No correlation was found between demographic, clinical and treatment variables and Ig serum levels., Conclusions: Hypogammaglobulinaemia following RTX is uncommon in IIM and is not related to any clinical variables, including GC dosage and previous treatments. IgG and IgM monitoring after RTX treatment does not seem useful in stratifying patients who require closer safety monitoring and prevention of infection, due to the lack of association between hypogammaglobulinaemia and the onset of severe infections.

Objectives: No clear-cut guidelines exist for the use of imaging procedures for the diagnosis of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM). The aim of the present study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of power Doppler ultrasonography (PDUS) score in IIM patients compared with a control group and its usefulness during follow-up., Methods: All patients evaluated in the Vasculitis and Myositis Clinic, Rheumatology Unit, University of Siena were prospectively collected. All patients underwent US examination of both thighs in axial and longitudinal scans, which were also performed twice (T1) or three times (T2)., Results: Forty-five patients with IIM (median [interquartile range] age 55 [45-66] years; 35 female) were enrolled. Receiver operating characteristic curves distinguished patients and controls based on ∑power Doppler (PD), ∑oedema, ∑atrophy and CRP. The best cut-off value for ∑PD was 0.5, ∑oedema 1.5, ∑atrophy 0.5 and CRP 0.22 mg/dl. In a logistic regression analysis, the variables that most influenced diagnosis of IIM were ∑PD and ∑oedema (P = 0.017 and P = 0.013, respectively). ∑Oedema was lower at T1 (P = 0.0108) and T2 (P = 0.0012) than at T0. Likewise, ∑PD was lower at T1 (P = 0.0294) and T2 (P = 0.0420) than at T0. Physician global assessment was lower at T1 (P = 0.0349) and T2 (P = 0.0035) than at baseline., Conclusion: Our findings show that PDUS is a reliable diagnostic tool in the differential diagnosis between inflammatory and non-inflammatory myopathies. Moreover, PDUS can be employed also during the follow-up of patients with IIM. A reduction in disease activity, measured by physician global assessment, led to a concomitant decrease in both oedema and PD, which was directly correlated with their rate of change. This underlines the close link between clinical assessment and PDUS findings, not only at diagnosis but also during monitoring., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) are a group of different conditions typically affecting striate muscle, lung, joints, skin and gastrointestinal tract. Treatment typically relies on glucocorticoids and synthetic immunosuppressants, but the occurrence of refractory, difficult to treat, manifestations, may require more aggressive treatment, borrowed from other autoimmune diseases, including biologic disease modifying drugs (bDMARDs). In this regard, we conducted a systemic literature review in order to depict the current evidence about the use of bDMARDs in IIM. A total of 78 papers, published during the last 21 years, were retrieved. The majority of patients was treated with TNF-α inhibitors, whose effectiveness was assessed particularly in recalcitrant striate muscle, skin and joints involvement. Rituximab, whose evidence is supported by a large number of real-life studies and trials, seems to be an excellent option in case of ILD and anti-synthetase syndrome, while Tocilizumab, despite not meeting primary and secondary endpoints in a recently published clinical trial, proved its effectiveness in rapidly progressing ILD. Similarly, Abatacept, studied in a phase IIb clinical trial with conflicting evidence, was reported to be effective in some case reports of refractory dermatomyositis. Less data exist for anti-IL1 and anti-IL23 agents, which were employed particularly for inclusion body myositis and severe skin disease, respectively. This study provides an organ-focused assessment of bDMARDs in IIM, which display encouraging results in the treatment of refractory subsets of disease., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination plays a crucial role as pivotal strategy to curb the coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic. The present study described the clinical status of patients affected by idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) after COVID-19 vaccination to assess the number of relapses. We included all patients affected by IIM and followed by Myositis Clinic, Rheumatology and Respiratory Diseases Units, Siena University Hospital, Bari University Hospital, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University, Rome, and Policlinico Paolo Giaccone, Palermo. They underwent a telephone survey. A total of 119 IIM patients (median, IQR 58 (47-66) years; 32males; 50 dermatomyositis, 39 polymyositis and 30 anti-synthetase syndrome) were consecutively enrolled. Except four patients who refused the vaccination, 94 (81.7%) received Comirnaty, 16 (13.9%) Spikevax, 5 (4.4%) Vaxzevria. Seven (6.1%) patients had flare after vaccination. One of them had life-threatening systemic involvement and died two months after second dose of COVID-19 vaccination. From logistic regression analysis, Chi 2 -log ratio = 0.045,the variable that most influences the development of flare was the number of organs involved (p = 0.047). Sixty-eight patients received the third dose of COVID-19 vaccination: 51(75%) Comirnaty and 17 (25%) Moderna. No patients had flares after third dose. Our study represents the largest cohort of IIM patients in which the incidence of recurrence after anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine was assessed. In line with real-life data from other diseases, we found a clinical non-statistically significant risk of relapse in our patients, which occurred seldom, usually mild and in patients with a more severe and aggressive course of disease., (© 2022. The Author(s).)