Search

Purpose: To evaluate Spot in detecting American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (AAPOS) Amblyopia risk factors (ARF) and for ARF myopia and hyperopia with variations in ocular pigments., Design: Diagnostic screening test evaluation., Methods: Study population: Children presented for a complete eye examination in pediatric clinic. The study population included 1040 participants, of whom 273 had darkly pigmented eyes, 303 were medium pigmented, and 464 were light pigmented., Intervention: Children were screened with the Spot vision screener before the complete eye examination. A pediatric ophthalmologist then completed an eye examination, including cycloplegic refraction. The pediatric ophthalmologist was blinded to the result of the Spot vision screener., Main Outcome: The association between Spot screening recommendation and meeting one or more ARF/ARF + Amblyopia criterion, Spot measured spherical equivalent, and ARF myopia and hyperopia detection., Results: The area under the receiver operative characteristic curve (AUC) for myopia was excellent for all. The AUC for hyperopia was good (darker-pigmented: 0.92, medium-pigmented: 0.81, and lighter-pigmented: 0.86 eyes). The Spot was most sensitive for ARF myopia (lighter-pigmented: 0.78, medium-pigmented: 0.52, darker-pigmented: 0.49). The reverse was found for hyperopia; however, sensitivity was relatively poor. The Spot was found most sensitive for hyperopia in the darker-pigment group (0.46), 0.27 for medium-pigment, and 0.23 for the lighter-pigment cohort., Conclusions: While the Spot was confirmed as a sensitive screening test with good specificity in our large cohort, the sensitivity of the Spot in detecting AAPOS guidelines for myopia and hyperopia differed with variations in skin pigment. Our results support the consideration of ethnic and racial diversity in future advances in photorefractor technology., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background/objectives: Tessellated fundus can exist in normal healthy eyes. This study aims to evaluate the occurrence and influencing factors of tessellated fundus in preschool children aged 3-6 years., Subjects/methods: This kindergarten-based cross-sectional study included 1716 children with an age range of 3-6 years. All participants underwent a comprehensive eye examination and a questionnaire. According to the number of quadrants occupied by tessellated fundus around the optic disc in fundus photographs, it was divided into four grades., Results: 600 (35.0%) children had peripapillary tessellation. According to the spherical equivalent (SE), the subjects were divided into three groups: Hyperopia group (SE > + 0.75D, n = 1194)；Pre-myopia group (-0.50D < SE ≤ + 0.75D, n = 455); Myopia group (SE ≤ -0.50D, n = 67). The proportion of peripapillary tessellated fundus was 33.0%, 38.0%, 50.7% respectively. According to the regression analysis, in the non-myopia group (Pre-myopia group and Hyperopia group), the occurrence of peripapillary tessellated fundus was associated with longer axial length (OR, 1.566; 95% CI: 1.229-1.996, p < 0.001) and larger corneal radius of curvature (OR, 1.837; 95% CI: 1.006-3.354, p = 0.048). However, in Pre-myopia group, the corneal radius of curvature was not associated with the occurrence of peripapillary tessellated fundus (p = 0.830). In Hyperopia group, the corneal radius of curvature was associated with the occurrence of peripapillary tessellated fundus (OR, 2.438; 95% CI: 1.160-5.122, p = 0.019)., Conclusions: The occurrence of peripapillary tessellated fundus is more than 30% in 3-6 year old preschool children. Tessellated fundus can also occur in non-myopic children, and is related to the length of axial length and large radius of corneal curvature., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Royal College of Ophthalmologists.)

Background: This research aims to generate normative values of hyperopia reserve and refractive progression as effective tools to estimate the risk of myopia., Methods: A 1-year follow-up study was conducted among Chinese children and adolescents aged 3-16 years selected from schools and kinder gardens using cluster sampling. All participants underwent examinations including visual acuity, axial length and cycloplegic autorefraction (1% cyclopentolate). Percentiles of spherical equivalent (SE) were calculated using Lambda-Mu-Sigma (LMS) method. Age-specific refractive progression and hyperopia reserve were determined by backward calculation., Results: Of 3118 participants, 1702 (54.6%) were boys with a mean baseline age of 7.30 years. The 50th percentile of SE estimated by LMS decreased from 1.04 D at 3 years to -2.04 D at 16 years in boys, while from 1.29 D to -2.81 D in girls. The 1-year refractive progression of myopes (0.81 D) was greater than that of non-myopes (0.51 D). The normative value of hyperopia reserve was 2.64 (range: 2.40 D-2.88 D) at 3 years and -0.35 (range: -0.50 to -0.17) D at 16 years, with the maximum progression of 0.35 D at the age of 6 years., Conclusion: Age-specific normative values of hyperopia reserve and yearly myopic shift in children and adolescents aged 3-16 years were provided, helping identify and monitor myopia and giving prevention in advance., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Purpose: This study evaluated the ability of QuickSee to detect children at risk for significant vision conditions (significant refractive error [RE], amblyopia and strabismus)., Methods: Non-cycloplegic refraction (using QuickSee without and with +2 dioptre (D) fogging lenses) and unaided binocular near visual acuity (VA) were measured in 4- to 12-year-old children. Eye examination findings (VA, cover testing and cycloplegic retinoscopy) were used to determine the presence of vision conditions. QuickSee performance was summarised by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity for various levels of RE. QuickSee referral criteria for each vision condition were chosen to maximise sensitivity at a specificity of approximately 85%-90%. Sensitivity and specificity to detect vision conditions were calculated using multiple criteria. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the benefit of adding near VA (6/12 or worse) for detecting hyperopia. A paired t-test compared QuickSee without and with fogging lenses., Results: The mean age was 8.2 (±2.5) years (n = 174). RE ranged up to 9.25 D myopia, 8 D hyperopia, 5.25 D astigmatism and 3.5 D anisometropia. The testability of the QuickSee was 94.3%. AUC was ≥0.92 (excellent) for each level of RE. For the detection of any RE, sensitivity and specificity were 84.2% and 87.3%, respectively, using modified Orinda criteria and 94.5% and 78.2%, respectively, using the American Academy for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (AAPOS) guidelines. For the detection of any significant vision condition, the sensitivity and specificity of QuickSee were 81.1% and 87.9%, respectively, using modified Orinda criteria and 93% and 78.6%, respectively, using AAPOS criteria. There was no significant benefit of adding near VA to QuickSee for the detection of hyperopia ≥+2.00 (p = 0.34). There was no significant difference between QuickSee measurements of hyperopic refractive error with and without fogging lenses (difference = -0.09 D; p = 0.51)., Conclusions: QuickSee had high discriminatory power for detecting children with hyperopia, myopia, astigmatism, anisometropia, any significant refractive error or any significant vision condition., (© 2024 The Authors. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of College of Optometrists.)

Purpose: This study aims to examine the short-term peripheral choroidal thickness (PChT) response to signed defocus blur, both with and without native peripheral aberrations. This examination will provide insights into the role of peripheral aberration in detecting signs of defocus., Methods: The peripheral retina (temporal 15°) of the right eye was exposed to a localized video stimulus in 11 young adults. An adaptive optics system induced 2D myopic or hyperopic defocus onto the stimulus, with or without correcting native peripheral ocular aberrations (adaptive optics [AO] or NoAO defocus conditions). Choroidal scans were captured using Heidelberg Spectralis OCT at baseline, exposure (10, 20, and 30 minutes), and recovery phases (4, 8, and 15 minutes). Neural network-based automated MATLAB segmentation program measured PChT changes from OCT scans, and statistical analysis evaluated the effects of different optical conditions over time., Results: During the exposure phase, NoAO myopic and hyperopic defocus conditions exhibited distinct bidirectional PChT alterations, showing average thickening (10.0 ± 5.3 µm) and thinning (-9.1 ± 5.5 µm), respectively. In contrast, induced AO defocus conditions did not demonstrate a significant change from baseline. PChT recovery to baseline occurred for all conditions. The unexposed fovea did not show any significant ChT change, indicating a localized ChT response to retinal blur., Conclusions: We discovered that the PChT response serves as a marker for detecting peripheral retinal myopic and hyperopic defocus blur, especially in the presence of peripheral aberrations. These findings highlight the significant role of peripheral oriented blur in cueing peripheral defocus sign detection.

This study aims to investigate the prevalence of visual impairments, such as myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism, among school-age children (7-9 years) in Lubelskie Voivodeship (Republic of Poland) and apply artificial intelligence (AI) in the detection of severe ocular diseases. A total of 1049 participants (1.7% of the total child population in the region) were examined through a combination of standardized visual acuity tests, autorefraction, and assessment of fundus images by a convolutional neural network (CNN) model. The results from this artificial intelligence (AI) model were juxtaposed with assessments conducted by two experienced ophthalmologists to gauge the model's accuracy. The results demonstrated myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism prevalences of 3.7%, 16.9%, and 7.8%, respectively, with myopia showing a significant age-related increase and hyperopia decreasing with age. The AI model performance was evaluated using the Dice coefficient, reaching 93.3%, indicating that the CNN model was highly accurate. The study underscores the utility of AI in the early detection and diagnosis of severe ocular diseases, providing a foundation for future research to improve paediatric ophthalmic screening and treatment outcomes., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: The aim of this study was to explore the association between parental myopia and high myopia with children's refraction and ocular biometry in large-scale Chinese preschool children from the Beijing Hyperopia Reserve Study., Subjects/methods: This cross-sectional kindergarten-based study enrolled children aged 3-6 years. Cycloplegic refraction, axial length (AL), and corneal radius (CR) were measured for all children. Parents were asked to complete a questionnaire about refractive status (no myopia, mild myopia &lt;-3 D, moderate myopia ≥-3 D and ≤-6, and high myopia &gt;-6 D)., Results: The study enrolled 2,053 children (1,069 boys and 984 girls), with a mean age of 4.26 ± 0.96 years and mean spherical equivalent refraction (SER) of 1.11 ± 0.97 diopter. Of the children, 90.7% had at least one myopic parent, and 511 children (24.9%) had at least one highly myopic parent. SER decreased significantly with increasing severity of parental myopia (p &lt; 0.001). Preschool children's myopia was independently associated with parental myopia (OR, 10.4 and 11.5 for one and two highly myopic parent[s]). Age (OR = 1.1), gender (OR = 1.7; girls as references), near work time (OR = 1.2), and both maternal (OR, 1.4 and 2.0 for moderate and high myopia) and paternal myopia (OR, 1.6 and 1.9 for moderate and high myopia) were independent risk factors for lacking hyperopia reserve., Conclusion: Severe parental myopia was associated with a lower SER, longer AL, and higher AL/CR ratio in preschool children. Parental myopia and near work may predispose children to faster elimination of hyperopia reserves before exposure to higher educational stress., (© 2023 The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Objective: This study aims to investigate the associations of axial length to corneal radius of curvature (AL/CRC) ratio with refractive error and to determine the effect of AL/CRC ratio on hyperopia reserve and myopia assessment among Chinese preschoolers., Methods: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study that evaluated subjects aged 4-6 years. AL and CRC were obtained using a non-contact ocular biometer. Correlation analysis was performed to explore the associations of AL/CRC ratio with spherical equivalent refractive error (SER). The accuracy of AL/CRC ratio for hyperopia reserve and myopia assessment was analysed using cycloplegic refraction by drawing receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves., Results: The analysis included 1024 participants (537 boys, 52.4%). The mean AL/CRC ratios in hyperopes, emmetropes and myopes were 2.90±0.06, 2.95±0.05 and 3.08±0.07, respectively. The SER was found to be more strongly correlated with AL/CRC ratio (ρ=-0.66, p<0.001) than either AL or CRC alone (ρ=-0.52, p<0.001; ρ=-0.03, p=0.33, respectively). AL/CRC was correlated with SER in hyperopes (ρ=-0.54, p<0.001), emmetropes (ρ=-0.33, p<0.001) and myopes (r=-0.67, p<0.001). For low hyperopia reserve assessment, the area under the ROC curves of AL/CRC ratio was 0.861 (95% CI 0.829 to 0.892), the optimal cut-off value of the AL/CRC ratio was ≥2.955. For myopia assessment, the area under the ROC curves of AL/CRC ratio was 0.954 (95% CI 0.925 to 0.982), the optimal cut-off value of the AL/CRC ratio was ≥2.975., Conclusions: The SER showed a better correlation with AL/CRC ratio than either AL or CRC alone, especially in myopes, among children aged 4-6 years. These findings indicate that when cycloplegic refraction is unavailable, AL/CRC ratio could be used as an alternative indicator for identifying low hyperopia reserve and myopia among preschoolers, helping clinicians and parents screen children with low hyperopia reserve before primary school in a timely manner., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.)

Objectives: The present study analyzed the reciprocal relationships between four common pediatric ophthalmic diseases (i.e., hyperopia, myopia, astigmatism, and strabismus) and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children., Methods: This study enrolled 86,028 children with ADHD and 1,798,673 children without ADHD in the Taiwan Maternal and Child Health Database who were born at any time from 2004 to 2017. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate the bidirectional relationships of the four ophthalmic diseases with ADHD in children after adjusting for age, sex, and gestational age at birth. Survival curves for time-to-event variables were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the log-rank test was used to compare the curves., Results: The results indicated that ADHD significantly predicted the occurrence of hyperopia, myopia, astigmatism, and strabismus. Furthermore, hyperopia, myopia, astigmatism, and strabismus significantly predicted the occurrence of ADHD. The time between enrollment and ADHD diagnosis was shorter for patients with ophthalmic diseases than for the control group, and the time between enrollment and ophthalmic disease diagnosis was also shorter for ADHD patients than for the control group. Sex differences were found in the associations between ADHD and ophthalmic diseases., Conclusion: Clinicians should monitor children with ADHD for hyperopia, myopia, astigmatism, and strabismus to ensure appropriate treatment, and vice versa., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Purpose: Treatments are available to slow myopic axial elongation. Understanding normal axial length (AL) distributions will assist clinicians in choosing appropriate treatment for myopia. We report the distribution of AL in Australians of different age groups and refractive errors., Methods: Retrospectively collected spherical equivalent refraction (SER) and AL data of 5938 individuals aged 5 to 89 years from 8 Australian studies were included. Based on the SER, participants were classified as emmetropes, myopes, and hyperopes. Two regression model parameterizations (piece-wise and restricted cubic splines [RCS]) were applied to the cross-sectional data to analyze the association between age and AL. These results were compared with longitudinal data from the Raine Study where the AL was measured at age 20 (baseline) and 28 years., Results: A piece-wise regression model (with 1 knot) showed that myopes had a greater increase in AL before 18 years by 0.119 mm/year (P < 0.001) and after 18 years by 0.011 mm/year (P < 0.001) compared to emmetropes and hyperopes, with the RCS model (with 3 knots) showing similar results. The longitudinal data from the Raine Study revealed that, when compared to emmetropes, only myopes showed a significant change in the AL in young adulthood (by 0.016 mm/year, P < 0.001)., Conclusions: The AL of myopic eyes increases more rapidly in childhood and slightly in early adulthood. Further studies of longitudinal changes in AL, particularly in childhood, are required to guide myopia interventions., Translational Relevance: The axial length of myopic eyes increases rapidly in childhood, and there is a minimal increase in the axial length in non-myopic eyes after 18 years of age.

Purpose: To evaluate the refractive status and ocular biometric parameters in primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG) eyes with different axial lengths (ALs)., Methods: In total, 742 Chinese PACG subjects with complete ophthalmic examinations were enrolled. The refractive status was categorized as myopia (spherical equivalent [SE] ≤-0.5 D), emmetropia (-0.5 D < SE < +0.5 D), and hyperopia (SE ≥+0.5 D), whereas the AL was divided into short (AL <22.5 mm), regular (22.5 ≤ AL <23.5 mm), and long (AL ≥23.5 mm). The refractive status and ocular biometric parameters were compared among different AL groups., Results: The mean AL of the PACG eyes was 22.53 ± 0.84 mm (range: 19.68-25.57 mm). The refractive status was significantly different among different AL groups (P < 0.001). Also, 92.6% of hyperopic PACG eyes showed AL <23.5 mm, and 19.0% of myopic PACG eyes showed AL ≥23.5 mm. The SE showed significant differences among different AL groups only in the hyperopic subjects (P = 0.012). The AL was significantly longer in myopic eyes (P < 0.001). The PACG eyes with longer AL exhibited lower keratometry, longer central anterior chamber depth and corneal diameter, and lens position and relative lens position closer to the anterior (P < 0.001)., Conclusion: Axial hyperopia was common in PACG eyes, and axial myopia was not uncommon. Relatively anterior lens position could explain the occurrence of PACG in the eyes with long AL., Competing Interests: None

Prcis: The risk of primary angle closure disease (PACD) rises rapidly with greater hyperopia while remaining relatively low for all degrees of myopia. Refractive error (RE) is useful for angle closure risk stratification in the absence of biometric data., Purpose: To assess the role of RE and anterior chamber depth (ACD) as risk factors in PACD., Methods: Chinese American Eye Study participants received complete eye examinations including refraction, gonioscopy, amplitude-scan biometry, and anterior segment ocular coherence tomography imaging. PACD included primary angle closure suspect (≥3 quadrants of angle closure on gonioscopy) and primary angle closure/primary angle closure glaucoma (peripheral anterior synechiae or intraocular pressure >21 mm Hg). Logistic regression models were developed to assess associations between PACD and RE and/or ACD adjusted for sex and age. Locally weighted scatterplot smoothing curves were plotted to assess continuous relationships between variables., Results: Three thousand nine hundred seventy eyes (3403 open angle and 567 PACD) were included. The risk of PACD increased with greater hyperopia [odds ratio (OR) = 1.41 per diopter (D); P < 0.001] and shallower ACD (OR = 1.75 per 0.1 mm; P < 0.001). Hyperopia (≥ + 0.5 D; OR = 5.03) and emmetropia (-0.5 D to +0.5 D; OR = 2.78) conferred a significantly higher risk of PACD compared with myopia (≤0.5 D). ACD (standardized regression coefficient = -0.54) was a 2.5-fold stronger predictor of PACD risk compared with RE (standardized regression coefficient = 0.22) when both variables were included in one multivariable model. The sensitivity and specificity of a 2.6 mm ACD cutoff for PACD were 77.5% and 83.2% and of a +2.0 D RE cutoff were 22.3% and 89.1%., Conclusion: The risk of PACD rises rapidly with greater hyperopia while remaining relatively low for all degrees of myopia. Although RE is a weaker predictor of PACD than ACD, it remains a useful metric to identify patients who would benefit from gonioscopy in the absence of biometric data., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To compare the apparent chord mu between hyperopia and myopia cases and investigate the usefulness of iris barycenter configurations as an alternative for performing kappa angle distance calculations., Methods: This prospective study evaluated 394 eyes of 197 patients classified into two groups according to their spherical equivalent values: the myopic (mean spherical equivalent refraction ≤  - 0.50 D) and the hyperopia group (mean spherical equivalent refraction ≥  + 0.50 D). The two groups were further subdivided according to severity (myopic group: mild, ≤  - 0.50 and ≤  - 3.00 D; moderate, <  - 3.00 and ≤  - 6.00 D; severe, <  - 6.00 D; hyperopic group: mild, ≥  + 0.50 and ≤  + 2.00 D; moderate, >  + 2.00 and ≤  + 4.00 D; severe, >  + 4.00 D). The pupil and iris barycenter distance measurements and other parameters were obtained through optical low-coherence reflectometry., Results: Of the 197 patients, 109 (55.3%) were female and 88 (44.7%) were male individuals; their ages ranged from 7 to 60 years (mean, 35.16 ± 14.75 years). The average pupil barycenter distances were 0.38 ± 0.15 and 0.21 ± 0.11 mm in hyperopia and myopia patients, respectively (p < 0.01). Corneal and lens thickness measurements were higher in hyperopia patients (p < 0.01, p < 0.01, respectively), whereas anterior chamber depth and pupil diameter measurements were higher in myopia patients (p < 0.01, p < 0.01, respectively). No significant difference in astigmatism or white-to-white measurements was observed between hyperopia and myopia patients (p > 0.05)., Conclusion: The measurements for the apparent chord mu of the pupil and iris barycenter origins were higher in hyperopic than in myopic cases., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.)

Clinical Relevance: For a correct spectacle prescription, accommodation spasm should not be overlooked in the measurements made using an autorefractometer. Although this can be easily understood with cycloplegia, it is not practical. Therefore, investigating practical methods that can predict excess accommodation will be useful in clinical practice., Background: To evaluate the performance of a photoscreener in detecting pseudo-myopia due to accommodation spasm and whether it eliminates the need for cycloplegia., Methods: Study was conducted in Van Training and Research Hospital. The manifest refraction of the patients was measured using an by an autorefractometer followed by a photoscreener before cycloplegia. Cycloplegic refraction errors were detected using an autorefractometer. Patients with pseudo-myopia due to accommodation spasm were diagnosed by observing a significant hyperopic shift in cycloplegic autorefractometer values compared to the non-cycloplegic values and were included in study. Cycloplegic autorefractometer and non-cycloplegic photoscreener measurements were compared., Results: The mean non-cycloplegic autorefractometer values were as follows: --6.34 ± 1.29D, -0.42 ± 0.58D, and -6.55 ± 1.36D for spherical, cylindrical, and spherical equivalents, respectively. These values were 0.23 ± 0.63D, -0.21 ± 0.41D, and 0.11 ± 0.73D for cycloplegic autorefractometer measurements, respectively. Cycloplegic autorefractometer values showed a significant hyperopic shift of 6.57 ± 1.26D and 6.67 ± 1.34D for spherical and spherical equivalents, respectively, compared to non-cycloplegic values (p < 0.001 for both). There was no significant difference between non-cycloplegic photoscreener and cycloplegic autorefractometer measurements for spherical, cylindrical, and spherical equivalents (p = 0.126, p = 0.078, and p = 0.053, respectively). . There was agreement between the measurements in the Bland-Altman graph., Conclusion: There was consistency between non-cycloplegic photoscreener and cycloplegic autorefractometer measurements in patients with pseudomyopia due to accommodation spasm. Therefore, photoscreener measurements can be a fast, practical, cost-effective examination method for screening these patients without the need for cycloplegia.

Objective: To determine the diagnostic agreement of non-cycloplegic and cycloplegic refraction in children., Method: The study methodology followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Electronic databases were searched for comparative studies exploring refraction performed on children under non-cycloplegic and cycloplegic conditions. There was no restriction on the year of publication; however, only publications in the English language were eligible. Inclusion criteria consisted of children aged ≤12 years, any degree or type of refractive error, either sex and no ocular or binocular co-morbidities. The QUADAS-2 tool was used to evaluate the risk of bias. Meta-analysis was conducted to synthesise data from all included studies. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were undertaken for those studies with a risk of bias., Results: Ten studies consisting of 2724 participants were eligible and included in the meta-analysis. The test for overall effect was not significant when comparing non-cycloplegic Plusoptix and cycloplegic autorefractors (Z = 0.34, p = 0.74). The pooled mean difference (MD) was -0.08 D (95% CI -0.54 D, +0.38 D) with a prediction interval of -1.72 D to +1.56 D. At less than 0.25 D, this indicates marginal overestimation of myopia and underestimation of hyperopia under non-cycloplegic conditions. When comparing non-cycloplegic autorefraction with a Retinomax and Canon autorefractor to cycloplegic refraction, a significant difference was found (Z = 9.79, p < 0.001) and (Z = 4.61, p < 0.001), respectively., Discussion: Non-cycloplegic Plusoptix is the most useful autorefractor for estimating refractive error in young children with low to moderate levels of hyperopia. Results also suggest that cycloplegic refraction must remain the test of choice when measuring refractive error ≤12 years of age. There were insufficient data to explore possible reasons for heterogeneity. Further research is needed to investigate the agreement between non-cycloplegic and cycloplegic refraction in relation to the type and level of refractive error at different ages., (© 2022 The Authors. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of College of Optometrists.)

Background: Amblyopia is the most frequent cause for decreased vision in childhood. Important risk factors for amblyopia (ARF) are refractive errors. The aim of this study was to examine the reliability of the Plusoptix Autorefractor A09 (POA09) to detect refractive ARF., Method: This prospective non-blinded, one-armed study was conducted between February 2012 and September 2015. Children aged 6 months to 12 years were screened in kindergarten and schools for refractive errors. Thresholds for screening failure were hyperopia ≥ 3.5 diopters (D), myopia ≥ 3.0 D, anisometropia ≥ 1.5 D and astigmatism ≥ 1.5 D (axis 90° or 180° ± 10°) or ≥ 1.0 D (≥ 10° axis deviation of 90° or 180°). Children who failed screening were advised to see an ophthalmologist for a comprehensive eye examination. After the visit, parents were asked for the results of the examination. A reference group of children who did not fail screening also received a comprehensive eye examination. Based on the number of children who failed screening, we calculated the proportion of correctly detected refractive errors. Based on the children of the reference group we calculated the proportion of correctly excluded refractive errors and the false negative rate., Results: In this study 3170 children were screened, 715 children (22.3%) failed screening. For 460 of these (64.3%) follow-up was available and for 132 children information on refractive errors in cycloplegia was available. Most frequent refractive errors at screening were astigmatism (90.9%) and anisometropia (11.4%). Most frequent refractive errors in cycloplegia were astigmatism (56.8%) and hyperopia (18.9%). The proportion of correctly detected refractive errors in the screening was highest for astigmatism (60%) and anisometropia (53.3%), followed by hyperopia (33.3%) and myopia (25%)., Conclusion: The reliability of POA09 to detect refractive ARF in children without cycloplegia was limited, highlighting the importance of a systematic amblyopia screening. A screening in cycloplegia can increase the proportion of correctly detected refractive ARF and should be studied., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Objective: The study aims to assess two refractive instrument-based methods of vision screening (SureSight and PlusoptiX) to detect refractive amblyopia risk factors (ARFs) and significant refractive errors in Chinese preschool children and to develop referral criteria according to the 2021 AAPOS guidelines., Methods: Eye examinations were conducted in children aged 61 to 72 months ( n = 1,173) using a PlusoptiX photoscreener, SureSight autorefractor, and cycloplegic retinoscopy (CR). The Vision Screening Committee of AAPOS's preschool vision screening guidelines from 2021 were adopted for comparison. Paired t -test analysis and Bland-Altman plots were used to assess the differences and agreement between the PlusoptiX photoscreener, SureSight autorefractor, and CR. In addition, the validity of the cut-off values of the several ARFs measured with the SureSight and PlusoptiX was estimated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and compared to the age-based 2021 AAPOS examination failure levels., Results: A total of 1,173 children were tested with comprehensive eye examinations. When the referral numbers based on the 2013 (43/3.67%) and 2021 (42/3.58%) AAPOS guidelines were compared, significant differences between the values of astigmatism (72.09 vs. 52.38%) and anisometropia (11.63 vs. 38.10%) were found. The 95% limits of agreement (LOA) of the spherical value and the cylindrical value between PlusoptiX and CR were 95.08 and 96.29%. It was 93.87 and 98.10% between SureSight and CR. Considering refractive failure levels, the ROC curves obtained the optimal cut-off points. However, the PlusoptiX and the SureSight showed lower efficiency in hyperopia (Youden index, 0.60 vs. 0.83) and myopia (Youden index, 078 vs. 0.93), respectively. After adjusting the above cut-off points, the optimized NES (Nanjing Eye Study) referral criteria for myopia, hyperopia, astigmatism, and anisometropia were -0.75, 1.25, -1.0, and 0.5 with PlusoptiX and -1.25, 2.75, -1.5, and 0.75 with SureSight., Conclusions: SureSight and PlusoptiX showed a good correlation with CR and could effectively detect refractive ARFs and visually significant refractive errors. There were obvious advantages in detecting hyperopia using SureSight and myopia using PlusoptiX. We proposed instrumental referral criteria for age-based preschool children based on AAPOS 2021 guidelines., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Yan, Li, Qian, Lin, Zhu, Wang, Zhao, Zhang, Sun, Hao, Tong, Zhu, Li, Zhu, Liu and Huang.)

Purpose: To study the profile, risk factors, and management outcomes of infantile strabismus at a tertiary eye care center., Methods: We prospectively analyzed the data of infants (children less than 1 year of age) who presented at our institute from August 2018 to December 2019. We excluded infants who did not complete a minimum follow-up of 6 months. Detailed meticulous history based on a set of standardized questionnaires was obtained and a comprehensive ophthalmological examination of the child was performed. Data were collected regarding refractive error (astigmatism; myopia; hyperopia; anisometropia [<1.0 DS or >1.0 DS]; astigmatism [<1.0 DS or >1.0 DS]) and the type of strabismus., Results: During this period, we saw 4,773 infants, out of which 123 infants were diagnosed to have infantile-onset strabismus (hospital prevalence of 2.6%). Boys and girls were equally affected. Sixty-two patients had esotropia, 37 had exotropia, 2 had hypotropia, and 22 had pseudo strabismus. Prematurity, hypermetropia, and anisometropia had increased odds of developing esotropia, whereas delivery by cesarean section, delayed cry at birth, infantile seizures, parental consanguinity, delayed development of milestones, and myopia had increased odds of developing exotropia. Twenty-nine patients underwent a surgical correction. The mean deviation at the first visit was 42.59 ± 15.40 PD and 8.25 ± 12.70 PD at the last visit. For all patients who underwent a squint surgery, the change in ocular deviation was clinically and statistically significant (P-value <0.0001, paired t-test)., Conclusion: The hospital prevalence of infantile strabismus in our cohort was found to be 2.6%. Our study suggests that esotropia is two-fold more common in our cohort as compared to exotropia. Further, our study highlights risk factors for the development of strabismus in infancy, which must be kept in mind and awareness must be created among pediatricians. Surgical correction should be considered early during the infantile period, because it may lead to promote the development of good binocular vision., Competing Interests: None

Significance: This study obtained normative database for angle κ using Orbscan 3. The average angle κ values were 2.3 ± 1.34° in the whole sample, 2.23 ± 1.36° in myopic eyes, and 3.3 ±1.5° in hyperopic eyes. This is very important to optimize refractive surgery outcomes., Purpose: The aim of this cross-sectional study was to obtain the value of mean angle κ in normal eyes of patients seeking laser vision correction, by the Orbscan 3., Methods: The study was conducted on healthy eyes of people seeking laser refractive surgery. A total of 1815 eyes of 908 candidates were included. These were examined as a part of pre-operative assessment. Orbscan 3 was used to measure angle κ and its XY intercepts, keratometry readings, central corneal thickness, thinnest location, white-to-white diameter, and corneal asphericity of front surface (Qf) and back surface (Qb)., Results: The mean ± standard deviation angle κ in all eyes was 2.3 ± 1.34°. The values were 2.23 ± 1.36° in myopic eyes, 3.3 ±1.5° in hyperopic eyes, and 2.9 ±1.6° in emmetropic eyes. Positive correlation was found between angle κ and age, spherical equivalent, subjective sphere, and white-to-white diameter. On the other hand, axial length, average keratometry, central corneal thickness, pupil diameter, and asphericity Q front were negatively correlated with angle κ., Conclusions: The mean ± standard deviation angle κ value measured by the Orbscan 3 was 2.3 ± 1.34°. This could be attributed to different software used, in addition to the relatively high axial length in the studied eyes., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest Disclosure: None of the authors have reported a financial interest., (Copyright © 2022 American Academy of Optometry.)

Purpose: To evaluate differences between autorefraction measurements with and without cycloplegia among school-aged individuals and to explore factors associated with significant differences., Design: Cross-sectional, retrospective study., Participants: Individuals between 3 and 22 years of age evaluated at the Illinois College of Optometry from September 2016 through June 2019 who underwent same-day noncycloplegic and cycloplegic autorefraction of the right eye., Methods: Demographic information including age, sex, and race or ethnicity were collected during the eye examination. Autorefraction was performed before and after cycloplegia. Myopia, defined as at least -0.50 diopter (D) spherical equivalent (SE), hyperopia, defined as at least +0.50 D SE, and astigmatism of at least 1.00 D cylinder were determined using noncycloplegic and cycloplegic autorefractions. Factors associated with at least 1.00 D more myopic SE or at least 0.75 D cylindrical difference by noncycloplegic autorefraction were assessed using logistic regression models., Main Outcome Measures: Differences between noncycloplegic and cycloplegic autorefraction measurements., Results: The mean age was 10.8 ± 4.0 years for the 11 119 individuals; 52.4% of participants were female. Noncycloplegic SE measured 0.65 ± 1.04 D more myopic than cycloplegic SE. After adjusting for demographic factors and refractive error, individuals with at least 1.00 D of more myopic SE refraction by noncycloplegic autorefraction (25.9%) were more likely to be younger than 5 years (odds ratio [OR], 1.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18-1.79) and 5 to younger than 10 years (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.18-1.48) than those 10 to younger than 15 years. This difference of at least 1.00 D of more myopic SE was more likely to be observed in Hispanic people (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.10-1.36) and those with hyperopia (OR range, 4.20-13.31). Individuals with 0.75 D or more of cylindrical difference (5.1%) between refractions were more likely to be younger than 5 years, to be male, and to have mild-moderate-high myopia or moderate-high hyperopia., Conclusions: Three quarters of school-aged individuals had < 1 D of myopic SE difference using noncycloplegic compared with cycloplegic autorefraction. Understanding measurement differences obtained for refractive error and associated factors may provide useful information for future studies or programs involving refraction in school-aged children., (Copyright © 2022 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Significance: The investigation of peripheral refraction profiles in Indian myopes showed relative peripheral hyperopic refraction in temporal retina and possible dominant role of hyperopic defocus signals from temporal retina in the development of myopia., Purpose: Considering that the peripheral refraction profiles were extensively reported to be associated with the central refractive error and vary among different ethnicities, we investigated the peripheral refraction profiles in Indians., Methods: A total of 161 participants aged between 18 and 33 years were included in the study. All of the eligible participants underwent a comprehensive eye examination. Central and peripheral refractions were determined using an open-field autorefractor in 10° intervals up to ±30° in the horizontal meridian, and in 5° intervals up to ±15° in the vertical meridian. Axial length and central corneal radius were measured using a non-contact optical biometer. Peripheral refraction was compared between the different refractive error groups and myopic subgroups., Results: Myopes showed a significant asymmetrical peripheral refraction profile along horizontal meridian with relative peripheral myopia at nasal 30° and relative peripheral hyperopia at temporal 30° (mean ± standard error at N30°: -0.37 ± 0.13 D vs. T30°: +0.56 ± 0.11 D, P < .05). Emmetropes and hyperopes showed relative peripheral myopia both in nasal and temporal eccentricities. Relative peripheral refraction was significantly different between the refractive groups and myopic subgroups along the temporal retinal eccentricities only (P < .05). Along the vertical meridian, relative peripheral myopia was seen among the three refractive error groups (P < .05). J0 and J45 significantly changed with retinal eccentricity along both the meridians in all the refractive error groups (P < .05)., Conclusions: Myopes showed an asymmetric type of peripheral refraction with relative hyperopic defocus in temporal retina and myopic defocus in the nasal retina. Possible role of retinal hyperopic defocus along temporal retina in myopiogenesis needs to be explored., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest Disclosure: None of the authors have reported a financial conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 American Academy of Optometry.)

Background/aims: Patients with BEST1 -associated autosomal dominant Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (AD-BVMD) have been reported to be hyperopic, but the prevalence of refractive error has not been described. This study aimed to characterise the type and degree of refractive error in a large cohort of patients with AD-BVMD compared with an age-similar group with ABCA4 -associated Stargardt disease., Methods: This was a retrospective chart review of consecutive patients with molecularly confirmed AD-BVMD and Stargardt macular dystrophy seen at a single academic centre. Demographic information, including age, gender and genotype were extracted from the chart. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), as well as type and degree of refractive error on manifest refraction for each eye on each visit, were recorded and compared., Results: A total of 178 eyes from 89 patients with AD-BVMD (35 women, 54 men; mean age 36.6 years) and 306 eyes from 153 patients (94 women, 59 men, mean age 30.2 years) with Stargardt disease were included in the study. Mean BCVA was excellent for both AD-BVMD and Stargardt eyes (logMAR 0.23 vs logMAR 0.31, respectively; p=0.55). At initial refraction, 73.0% of AD-BVMD eyes (130/178) were hyperopic, with mean spherical equivalent (SE) +1.38 dioptres (median +0.88) whereas 80.7% of Stargardt eyes (247/306) were myopic, with mean SE of -1.76 dioptres (median -1.19) (p<0.001)., Conclusion: Patients with AD-BVMD are predominantly hyperopic, whereas those with Stargardt disease are predominantly myopic. The findings provide further evidence of a role for BEST1 in ocular growth and development., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Purpose: To investigate the dependence of the area of the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) on axial eye length (AL) and to develop a feasible method for correcting this dependence., Material and Methods: The study involved 209 patients over the age of 18 years (209 eyes), of them 52 patients with AL of 20-22 mm (hyperopia group), 60 patients with AL of 25.5-28.5 mm (myopia group) and 97 patients with AL of 22.5-24.5 mm (emmetropia group). Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) examination was performed on Cirrus HD-OCT 5000 with AngioPlex («Carl Zeiss Meditec», Germany)., Results: FAZ area was corrected using the Littmann-Bennett formula modified by A.A. Shpak and M.V. Korobkova. FAZ area values both in emmetropic patients and in patients with refractive errors varied over a very wide range. Before correction, AL had a significant influence on the FAZ area (mm 2 ), which compared to the emmetropia group (0.27±0.09) was significantly reduced in the myopia group (0.21±0.07; p <0.000) and increased in the hyperopia group (0.31±0.11; p =0.015). The corrected FAZ area values did not differ in the compared groups. After correction the FAZ area decreased on average by 19% in the hyperopia group and increased by 25% in the myopia group. A chart and an Excel (Microsoft)/LibreOffice Calc program have been developed for correction of the FAZ area depending on the AL., Conclusion: Refractive errors, especially high-degree ones, have a significant effect on the FAZ area. This study proposes an original chart and a calculation program for correct interpretation of FAZ area measurements in patients with refractive errors, providing an accessible and quick way to assess the obtained results.

Purpose: Wavelength and temporal frequency have been found to influence refractive development. This study investigated whether retinal dopamine (DA) plays a role in these processes., Methods: Guinea pigs were randomly divided into nine groups that received different lighting conditions for 4 weeks, as follows: white, green, or blue light at 0, 0.5, or 20.0 Hz. Refractions and axial lengths were measured using streak retinoscopy and A-scan ultrasound imaging. DA and its metabolites were measured by high-pressure liquid chromatography-electrochemical detection., Results: At 0 Hz, green and blue light produced myopic and hyperopic shifts compared with that of white light. At 0.5 Hz, no significant changes were observed compared with those of green or blue light at 0 Hz, whereas white light at 0.5 Hz induced a myopic shift compared with white light at 0 or 20 Hz. At 20 Hz, green and blue light acted like white light. Among all levels of DA and its metabolites, only vitreous 3, 4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC) levels and retinal DOPAC/DA ratios were dependent on wavelength, frequency, and their interaction. Specifically, retinal DOPAC/DA ratios were positively correlated with refractions in white and green light conditions. However, blue light (0, 0.5, and 20.0 Hz) produced hyperopic shifts but decreased vitreous DOPAC levels and retinal DOPAC/DA ratios., Conclusions: The retinal DOPAC/DA ratio, indicating the metabolic efficiency of DA, is correlated with ocular growth. It may underlie myopic shifts from light exposure with a long wavelength and low temporal frequency. However, different biochemical pathways may contribute to the hyperopic shifts from short wavelength light.

Purpose: To determine the long-term longitudinal axial length changes in myopic and hyperopic adults with an iris-fixated phakic intraocular lens (pIOL)., Methods: The medical records of patients aged ≥18 years with myopia or hyperopia who were treated with pIOL implantation between 1996 and 2011 for refractive correction with a minimum follow-up of 5 years after pIOL implantation were analyzed. The main outcome measure was change in ocular axial length over time., Results: 149 eyes of 149 myopic patients and 27 hyperopic eyes of 27 patients were included in this study. Mean patient age was 37.1 ± 10.4 years (35% male) in the myopic group and 39.4 ± 9.4 years (4% male) in the hyperopic group. The eyes of the myopic patients showed a significant mean increase in axial length of 0.45 ± 0.61 mm after a mean follow-up time of 144 ± 38 months (p < 0.001). In 26 eyes (17%), the axial length had increased by ≥1 mm. The mean annual axial length increase was 0.04 ± 0.06 mm. Axial elongation was associated with a higher degree of myopia (p < 0.001) and younger age (p = 0.02). The eyes of the hyperopic patients showed no change in axial length over time., Conclusions: Myopic eyes corrected with an iris-fixated pIOL show continuous increase in axial length at an adult age. Although this study is limited to subjects with a pIOL, this is the first time myopization in Caucasian adults has been reported in a large long-term longitudinal study., (© 2020 The Authors. Acta Ophthalmologica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation.)

Purpose: To generate continuous growth curves for axial length (AL) in German children. We hypothesise that percentile curves of AL can be used as a predictive measure of myopia., Methods: In this longitudinal and cross-sectional LIFE Child Study, children's non-cycloplegic refraction data was collected using the Zeiss i.Profiler plus while AL was measured using the Haag-Streit Lenstar. Reference growth curves were estimated as a continuous non-parametric function of age., Results: Data from 4511 visits of 1965 participants (1021 boys and 944 girls) between 3 and 18 years of age were analysed. For all ages and percentiles, the estimated AL was higher in boys than girls. AL differences between boys and girls were most pronounced in the 98 th percentile at 3 years of age, being 0.93 mm longer eyes in boys. This difference decreased to 0.21 mm at 18 years of age. While the lower percentiles of AL reach their final value around age 13, the 50 th percentile was still increasing by 0.05 mm per year until the end of the observation period. While, in general, children with longer eyes are more likely to develop myopia, this relationship is weaker between the ages of 5 and 8., Conclusion: The LIFE Child Study data provides European AL data. In both Germany and China, AL has comparable growth rates when the baseline ALs are compared as percentiles. Thus, percentile curves of AL can be used as a predictive measure for the likelihood of developing as well as the progression of myopia., (© 2021 The Authors. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of College of Optometrists.)

Purpose: Straylight refers to an optical phenomenon that takes places in the eye and leads to a deterioration of the retinal image. Past clinical findings suggest an increase of straylight with the eye's axial length, but the aetiology of the phenomenon was unclear. The purpose of this work is to demonstrate, through raytracing, simple geometrical optics, and the well-established inverse-angle square law for the angular distribution of straylight, why straylight increases when a myopic eye is corrected with spectacles., Methods: The angular dependence of straylight is investigated using geometrical optics. An expression relating the eye's 2 nd nodal point, the ocular axial length and the eye's straylight parameter S is found. Subsequently, using a model of the human eye, the location of the 2 nd nodal point is computed using ray tracing for different axial lengths and refractive corrections. Finally, the results are compared against psychophysical data for the straylight parameter, corrected for the subject's age., Results: When correcting axial myopia using spectacles, the eye's 2 nd nodal point shifts towards the retina and away from the scattering plane, leading to an increase in straylight. Meanwhile, straylight should theoretically decrease in hyperopic eyes. Contact lenses keep the 2 nd nodal point relative stable, leading to a very minor change in straylight with axial length. Our model has shown good agreement with previously taken straylight measurements in real eyes, explaining the observed change of straylight with ocular axial length., Conclusion: We proposed an explanation for the underlying optical mechanism for the clinically observed increase of straylight with axial myopia, when corrected with glasses. Our model predicts that the increase can be as high as 0.12 log units for a myopic eye with 10 dioptres, which agrees with prior observations., (© 2020 The Authors Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics © 2020 The College of Optometrists.)

A 31-year-old woman was seen at our clinic with dissatisfying hyperopic error after a myopic laser treatment of her left eye in April 2018. The surgery took place 1 year previously. There were no abnormalities in her medical history.The preoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) in the left eye was 20/16 with -7.50 -0.50 × 75. The refraction in the right eye was -3.50 -1.25 × 90. The cycloplegic correction of the left eye preoperatively was -6.50 -0.50 × 68. A femtosecond-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis procedure was performed with an optical zone of 6.3 mm, an ablation zone of 7.97 mm, and a maximum ablation depth of 121 μm. The laser was set at a correction of -7.50 -0.5 × 75. The temperature and humidity during the laser treatment were 20 degrees and 47%, respectively. shows the excimer laser treatment data (AMARIS 750, SCHWIND eye-tech-solutions).At 1 week postoperatively the uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) was 20/25, and at 1 month postoperatively the CDVA was 20/16 with +2.50. Slitlamp examination showed a clear cornea. No corneal topography was made at that timepoint. At referral 7 months later, the patient's UDVA was 20/100 and CDVA was 20/16 with +2.50 -1.25 × 140 in the left eye. The patient reports decreased vision since the treatment in 2018 and wants to see better without spectacles. shows the postoperative Scheimpflug topography of the left eye, flat keratometry (K1) 36.1 @ 178.4 and steep keratometry (K2) 36.6 @ 88.4. What do you believe could be the cause of this overcorrection? What is your advice in terms of correction of the refractive error for this patient?

Objective: This study was conducted to evaluate the level of agreement in keratometry measurements between a rotating Scheimpflug imaging-based system (Pentacam) and a handheld auto-refractokeratometer (handheld NIDEK ARK-30)., Method: This analytical cross-sectional study was conducted in the right eyes of 579 subjects. Keratometry measurements were conducted with the Pentacam and the handheld NIDEK ARK-30 systems. The SPSS Software version 22 and MedCalc V3 were applied to estimate descriptive statistics using paired t-test, Pearson correlation coefficient, 95% limits of agreement (LoA), and Bland-Altman plot., Results: In the total sample, the inter-device difference in the mean flat and steep keratometry values was -0.266 diopter (D) (P-value<0.001) and 0.052D (P-value=0.093), respectively. There was a significant difference in mean flat keratometry between the two devices in all groups of refractive errors (paired difference <0.5D and P-value<0.001). The difference in mean steep keratometry was significant only in myopic subjects (P-value=0.046). The 95% LoA between the two devices measurements was 2.51D, 3.98D, and 6.37D for flat keratometry and 2.6D, 3.2D, and 3.9D for steep keratometry in emmetropic, myopic, and hyperopic subjects, respectively., Conclusion: Our study showed relatively wide limits of agreement between handheld NIDEK ARK-30 and Pentacam; therefore, these devices cannot be used interchangeably for measuring corneal curvature., (Copyright © 2019 Spanish General Council of Optometry. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Patients with poor vision screening results should be referred to an ophthalmology subspecialist for further testing to define the refractive error. Refractive errors are influenced by the optical power of the cornea and lens, along with the length of the eye (ie, total of the lens thickness, anterior, and vitreous chamber depth). Refractive errors include myopia, in which the visual image focuses in front of the retina, and hyperopia, in which the visual image focuses behind the retina. Patients with myopia, or nearsightedness, are able to see near objects better than those at a distance. Being outdoors or participation in physical activity outdoors may prevent myopia. Eyeglasses, surgery, and pharmacotherapy also have been studied to correct and prevent progression of myopia. Patients with hyperopia, or farsightedness, have good distance vision but may have more difficulty with reading. Another concern for children with hyperopia is development of strabismus because of refractive error. Eyeglasses and surgery are the management options for hyperopia., (Written permission from the American Academy of Family Physicians is required for reproduction of this material in whole or in part in any form or medium.)

Research in animal models have shown that exposing the eye to positive or negative spectacle lenses can lead to predictable changes in eye growth. Recent research indicates that brief periods (1-2 h) of monocular defocus results in small, but significant changes in axial length and choroidal thickness of human subjects. However, the effects of the time of day on these ocular changes with defocus are not known. In this study, we examined the effects of monocular myopic and hyperopic defocus on axial length and choroidal thickness when applied in the morning (change between 10 a.m. and 12 p.m.) vs the evening (change between 5 and 7 p.m.) in young adult human participants (mean age, 23.44 ± 4.52 years). A series of axial length (using an IOL Master) and choroidal thickness (using an optical coherence tomographer) measurements were obtained over three consecutive days in both eyes. Day 1 (no defocus) examined the baseline ocular measurements in the morning (10 a.m. and 12 p.m.) and in the evening (5 and 7 p.m.), day 2 investigated the effects of hyperopic and myopic defocus on ocular parameters in the morning (subjects wore a spectacle lens with +3 or -3 DS over the right eye and a plano lens over the left eye between 10 a.m. and 12 p.m.), and day 3 examined the effects of defocus in the evening (+3 or -3 DS spectacle lens over the right eye between 5 and 7 p.m.). Exposure to myopic defocus caused a significant reduction in axial length and thickening of the subfoveal choroid at both times; but, compared to baseline data from day 1, the relative change in axial length (-0.021 ± 0.009 vs +0.004 ± 0.003 mm, p = 0.009) and choroidal thickness (+0.027 ± 0.006 vs +0.007 ± 0.006 mm, p = 0.011) with defocus were significantly greater for evening exposure to defocus than for the morning session. On the contrary, introduction of hyperopic defocus resulted in a significant increase in axial length when given in the morning (+0.026 ± 0.006 mm), but not in the evening (+0.001 ± 0.003 mm) (p = 0.047). Furthermore, hyperopic defocus resulted in a significant thinning of the choroid (p = 0.005), but there was no significant influence of the time of day on choroidal changes associated with hyperopic defocus (p = 0.672). Exposure to hyperopic and myopic defocus at different times of the day was also associated with changes in the parafoveal regions of the choroid (measured across 1.5 mm nasal and temporal choroidal regions on either side of the fovea). Our results show that ocular response to optical defocus varies significantly depending on the time of day in human subjects. These findings represent a potential interaction between the signal associated with the eye's natural diurnal rhythm and the visual signal associated with the optical defocus, making the eye perhaps more responsive to hyperopic defocus (or 'go' signal) in the morning, and to myopic defocus (or 'stop' signal) in the latter half of the day., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To investigate the relationship between seasonal variation of daylight length and spherical equivalent (SE) progression among the schoolchildren participating in the Myopia Investigation Study in Taipei., Methods: We used the first-year data from grade 2 schoolchildren who completed all the baseline and two follow-up examinations (n=6790). There were two 6-month intervals between visits over winter and summer, respectively. For each interval, we calculated average daily daylight length using data from Taiwan's Central Weather Bureau and measured 6-month SE progression rate based on right eye cycloplegic autorefraction data. The midpoint month was defined as the month midway between two consecutive visits., Results: By the midpoint month, average daily daylight length was the shortest in December (671±7 min/day) and the longest (785±7 min/day) in June, and SE progression rate was the fastest (-0.23±0.48 D) in December and the slowest (-0.17±0.51 D) in June. Significant variation of SE progression rate with season can be observed only among the schoolchildren (n=1905) whose midpoint months for the winter and summer intervals were December and June (winter rate, -0.25±0.47 D; summer rate, -0.17±0.49 D; p<0.001). Of those, the summer progression rate was approximately 80%, 65% and 61.5% of that measured in winter for myopic (p=0.252), emmetropic (p=0.012) and hyperopic (p=0.012) schoolchildren, respectively., Conclusion: Our data demonstrate a seasonal variation of minus shift in refractive error among Taipei schoolchildren who had significant daytime fluctuation during the 1-year follow-up. Of those, non-myopic children had significant and more pronounced variation of SE progression than myopic children., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared, (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Purpose: To compare the anterior segment parameters of myopic, hyperopic, and emmetropic children by using optical biometry., Methods: This prospective cross-sectional study included 150 eyes of 150 children between 6 and 16 years old. The eyes were divided into three groups according to their spherical equivalent (SE) refractive error values as myopic [between - 1.0 and - 6.0 diopter (D)], emmetropic (between + 0.50 and - 0.50 D), and hyperopic (between + 1. 0 and + 3.0 D). Axial length (AL), central corneal thickness, anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), and mean keratometry (K mean) measurements were obtained by an optical biometry (LenStar LS 900, Haag Streit Diagnostics) were compared between the groups., Results: There were no statistically significant differences regarding the ages and genders of the participants between the groups (p > 0.05). The mean SE refractive error values were - 2.20 ± 0.71 D in myopic, - 0.08 ± 0.49 D in emmetropic, and + 2.06 ± 0.53 D in hyperopic eyes. The mean AL values were 24.50 ± 0.69, 23.41 ± 0.61, and 22.33 ± 0.61 mm, respectively, in myopic, emmetropic, and hyperopic eyes (p < 0.001). The mean ACD values were 3.94 ± 0.22, 3.78 ± 0.23, and 3.45 ± 0.20 mm, respectively, in myopic, emmetropic, and hyperopic eyes (p < 0.001). The mean LT values were 3.56 ± 0.20, 3.43 ± 0.17, and 3.31 ± 0.12 mm, respectively, in myopic, emmetropic, and hyperopic eyes (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the other parameters between the groups., Conclusions: Refractive errors are the main factors those affect anterior segment parameters and AL in children and the most severely affected parameters were found to be the AL, ACD, and LT values.

Ocular parameters have been applied to ophthalmic lens designs in order to satisfy individual wearers. An axial length (AL) of them can be used in individual ophthalmic lens designs. Our aim was to propose a reliable formula that predicts an individual's AL using the corneal radius and refractive error, and to demonstrate the applicability of this formula. A total of 348 subjects underwent keratometry, objective and subjective refraction, and AL measurement. The formula of calculated AL for prediction obtained from the original Gullstrand simplified schematic eye: calculated AL = (24.00 × aveK/7.80)-(SE × 0.40), where aveK and SE denote average corneal radius and spherical equivalent, respectively. Calculated AL was 24.50 ± 1.83 mm, which was 0.18 ± 0.47 mm longer than the measured value of 24.32 ± 1.73 mm (p < 0.001). The proportion showing the differences between the calculated and measured ALs were 284 eyes (40.8%) for 0.00-0.25 mm, 525 eyes (75.4%) for less than 0.50 mm, 665 eyes (95.5%) for less than 1.00 mm, and 31 eyes (4.5%) for more than 1.01 mm. Correlation coefficient showed a very high correlation between calculated and measured ALs (r = 0.967, p < 0.001), and higher in the myopic than in the hyperopic group. The mean difference was 0.18 mm; the 95% limit of agreement was +1.10--0.75 mm in all groups. Agreement was better in hyperopic eyes than myopic eyes. Prediction from calculation of AL with a formula using the corneal radius and SE provides an alternative method to direct measurements of AL, especially in the restricted environment, which can't use biometric equipment for personalized ophthalmic lens design., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Purpose: To compare the visual acuity and refractive error using OPDIII and subjective findings in visually normal subjects., Method: This study was performed on 75 participants (134 eyes) with an age range of 18 to 35 years. Visual acuity was evaluated using both subjective Snellen chart and OPDIII devices. Also, OPDIII objective refraction was compared with subjective refraction. Paired t test was used to compare mean visual acuity and refractive error. The 95% limits of agreement (LOAs) were reported to evaluate the agreement between subjective and objective methods., Results: The mean Snellen visual acuity was 0.705±0.243 logMAR in group with myopia and 0.375±0.207 logMAR in group with hyperopia. Visual acuity obtained using OPDIII was 0.632±0.270 and 0.054±0.084 logMAR in groups with myopia and hyperopia, respectively. There was a significant difference in the mean visual acuity between OPDIII and Snellen chart. The correlation of the Snellen chart with OPDIII was 0.862 and -0.172 in myopic and hyperopic groups, respectively. The 95% LOAs of the OPDIII with Snellen chart were -0.33 to 0.18 and -0.14 to 0.79 logMAR in myopic and hyperopic patients, respectively. The mean spherical power obtained by OPDIII was more negative than that of subjective refraction (OPDIII mean difference -0.272±0.335 and 0.163±0.302 DS in myopic and hyperopic groups respectively), while the cylinder power was less than that of the subjective refraction (OPDIII mean difference 0.488±0.566 and 0.030±0.255 DC in groups with myopia and hyperopia, respectively). The correlation of OPDIII with subjective refraction was 0.905, 0.920 in measurement of the spherical power and 0.908, 0.928 in measurement of the cylinder power in groups with myopia and hyperopia, respectively., Conclusion: Visual acuity scores were significantly better using OPDIII compared with Snellen chart in group with myopia, whereas the Snellen chart provided the better visual acuity scores in hyperopic patients. Although the correlation of OPDIII with subjective refraction in measuring the refractive error was high, OPDIII showed a significant difference with subjective refraction.

Purpose: To analyse the short-term interaction between a short period of myopic and hyperopic defocus and the muscarinic antagonist homatropine upon the choroidal thickness and ocular biometrics of healthy subjects., Methods: Thirty young adults (15 myopes and 15 emmetropes) aged 18-35 years had subfoveal choroidal thickness (ChT) and ocular biometry measurements taken before, 30 min, and 60 min following the introduction of monocular optical blur (0.00 D, +3.00 D and -3.00 D) combined with administration of either 2% homatropine or placebo (total of six conditions). Each combination of optical blur and drug was tested on different days, 2 days apart, in randomised order. For choroidal thickness, we captured three SD OCT images (5 mm, cross scans centred at the fovea with 999 A-scans and 50 B-scans) with the Copernicus SOCT HR instrument (www.optopol.com). A masked observer manually segmented the average B-scan images to derive subfoveal choroidal thickness measurements from each measurement session., Results: The choroid exhibited significant thinning after imposing hyperopic defocus (-3.00 D) combined with placebo (-11 ± 3 μm, p < 0.001). Homatropine prevented the significant choroidal thinning response with hyperopic defocus (+3 ± 2 μm), and the magnitude of ChT change was significantly different to placebo and hyperopic defocus (p < 0.001). There was a significant increase in ChT after the introduction of myopic defocus (+3.00 D) with placebo (+12 ± 3 μm, p < 0.0001) and homatropine combined with myopic defocus also caused a similar increase in ChT (+11 ± 3 μm; p < 0.001). Eyes treated with homatropine alone exhibited a significant increase in ChT (+14 ± 3 μm, p < 0.0001). There was no evidence of differences in choroidal response between refractive groups. Axial length also underwent small but significant changes (all p < 0.01 except homatropine/hyperopic blur and placebo) that were of similar magnitude, but of opposite direction to the changes in choroidal thickness., Conclusions: Homatropine appears to block the thinning effect of hyperopic defocus on choroidal thickness but did not enhance the thickening effect of myopic defocus. The changes in the choroid may relate to the different pathways in the eye's response to myopic and hyperopic blur or reflect an upper limit on the capacity of the choroid to thicken in the short-term., (© 2018 The Authors Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics © 2018 The College of Optometrists.)

Purpose: It is unknown which retinal cells are involved in the retina-to-sclera signaling cascade causing myopia. As inherited retinal dystrophies (IRD) are characterized by dysfunction of a single retinal cell type and have a high risk of refractive errors, a study investigating the affected cell type, causal gene, and refractive error in IRDs may provide insight herein., Design: Case-control study., Methods: Study Population: Total of 302 patients with IRD from 2 ophthalmogenetic centers in the Netherlands. Reference Population: Population-based Rotterdam Study-III and Erasmus Rucphen Family Study (N = 5550). Distributions and mean spherical equivalent (SE) were calculated for main affected cell type and causal gene; and risks of myopia and hyperopia were evaluated using logistic regression., Results: Bipolar cell-related dystrophies were associated with the highest risk of SE high myopia 239.7; odds ratio (OR) mild hyperopia 263.2, both P < .0001; SE -6.86 diopters (D) (standard deviation [SD] 6.38), followed by cone-dominated dystrophies (OR high myopia 19.5, P < .0001; OR high hyperopia 10.7, P = .033; SE -3.10 D [SD 4.49]); rod dominated dystrophies (OR high myopia 10.1, P < .0001; OR high hyperopia 9.7, P = .001; SE -2.27 D [SD 4.65]), and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE)-related dystrophies (OR low myopia 2.7; P = .001; OR high hyperopia 5.8; P = .025; SE -0.10 D [SD 3.09]). Mutations in RPGR (SE -7.63 D [SD 3.31]) and CACNA1F (SE -5.33 D [SD 3.10]) coincided with the highest degree of myopia and in CABP4 (SE 4.81 D [SD 0.35]) with the highest degree of hyperopia., Conclusions: Refractive errors, in particular myopia, are common in IRD. The bipolar synapse and the inner and outer segments of the photoreceptor may serve as critical sites for myopia development., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: This report describes a rapid method of vision correction used by Special Operations Medics in multiple operational engagements., Methods: Between 2011 and 2015, Special Operations Medics used an algorithm- driven refraction technique. A standard block of instruction was provided to the medics, along with a packaged kit. The technique was used in multiple operational engagements with host nation military and civilians. Data collected for program evaluation were later analyzed to assess the utility of the technique., Results: Glasses were distributed to 230 patients with complaints of either decreased distance or near (reading). Most patients (84%) with distance complaints achieved corrected binocular vision of 20/40 or better, and 97% of patients with near-vision complaints achieved corrected near-binocular vision of 20/40 or better. There was no statistically significant difference between the percentages of patients achieving 20/40 when medics used the technique under direct supervision versus independent use., Conclusion: A basic refraction technique using a designed kit allows for meaningful improvement in distance and/or near vision at austere locations. Special Operations Medics can leverage this approach after specific training with minimal time commitment. It can serve as a rapid, effective intervention with multiple applications in diverse operational environments., (2017.)

Purpose: To evaluate the alterations in mean central choroidal, central macular, and disk retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT) during Valsalva maneuver among patients with high refractive errors., Methods: A total of 60 high myopic (≥-6.0 D) and 50 high hyperopic (≥ + 3.0 D) eyes of 58 patients aged 19-65 years with visual acuity of 20/20 and without any ophthalmologic or systemic diseases were evaluated by OCT before and after the Valsalva maneuver. The choroidal thickness was measured with enhanced depth imaging OCT method. Central macular thickness, disk RNFL thickness, and axial length were also assessed., Results: Mean choroidal thickness increased significantly from 275.0 ± 27.2 μm at rest to 279.8 ± 31.6 μm after Valsalva maneuver in high myopic patients, and from 308.2 ± 27.3 μm to 313.6 ± 28.5 μm in high hyperopic patients (p<0.01 for each). A significant negative correlation of the choroidal thickness was noted with axial length (r = -0.509, p<0.01) and age (r = -0.224, p = 0.01) in the overall study population. Mean central macular thickness was 242.9 ± 44.4 μm and 254.0 ± 22.8 μm, while mean disk RNFL thickness was 81.6 ± 12.4 μm and 98.4 ± 13.3 μm in high myopic and hyperopic patients, respectively. Valsalva maneuver was not associated with significant change in central macular or disk RNFL thickness., Conclusions: Significant association of Valsalva maneuver with an increase in choroidal thickness was noted among patients with high degree of myopia and hyperopia. Our findings emphasize the likelihood of increase in choroidal volume due to venous distension to be responsible for the increase observed in choroidal thickness after Valsalva maneuver.

Purpose: High levels of visual acuity are required to hit a baseball effectively. Research has shown that any decrease in vision is likely caused by low-order optical aberrations. This study is designed to validate the SVOne autorefractor, and describe the amount and type, of low-order optical aberrations present in a large cohort of professional baseball players., Methods: A retrospective chart review on the 608 Major League Baseball players evaluated during the 2016 Spring Training Season was performed. Results for a subset of players who had both manifest refraction as well as autorefraction were calculated. Subsequently, after determining the accuracy of the autorefraction system in this population, refractive results for the entire population were determined., Results: There was a borderline statistically significant difference in mean spherical refractive error (M) between the manifest refraction and the SVOne auto refraction (-0.273D in the manifest refraction method vs. -0.503D in the SVOne method, P = .06) in the subset of athletes who underwent both tests. Additionally, there was no difference in the J0 or J45 cylindrical component vectors for each method. For the entire eligible population, the SVOne autorefraction system found a mean spherical refractive error (M) of -0.228D, a J0 value of -0.013D, and a J45 value of -0.040D., Conclusions: These data suggest that the SVOne autorefraction system is generally able to measure the refractive error in the baseball population. The system was slightly biased, often reporting more myopia in myopic subjects. Thus, careful evaluation of the refractive status of these athletes coupled with careful subjective refractive correction for those with less than average vision for baseball is strongly suggested.

Purpose: To evaluate long-term refractive outcomes of implantable collamer lens (ICL) implantation and late postoperative complications., Methods: We assessed outcomes of patients who underwent ICL implantation (type ICM V4 for myopia, ICH V3 for hyperopia, TICM V4 for astigmatism) in our department between 1998 and 2013. It comprised 62 eyes (40 myopic and 22 hyperopic). The average follow-up period was 10.5 years. We evaluated: uncorrected and best-corrected visual acuity (UCVA and BCVA), spherical equivalent (SE), ICL vault, endothelial cell density and late postoperative complications., Results: In myopes, the average UCVA was 1.0±0.37 and BCVA 1.18±0.38, in hyperopes 0.78±0.19 and 1.14±0.18, respectively. The average SE in myopes, whose target refraction was emmetropia, was -0.6±0.83 Dsf, in hyperopes +0.73±0.93. Central ICL vault was 206.16μm±105.94, (range 10-427) in myopes, 195.5μm±109.09, (range 20-404) in hyperopes. The most common late postoperative complication was cataract formation. Three myopic eyes (7.5%) developed symptomatic anterior subcapsular opacities with loss of at least two lines of BCVA. Cataract significantly affecting visual acuity occurred in 5 myopic eyes (12.5%) and 2 hyperopic eyes (9.09%). In these eyes, ICL removal and cataract surgery was performed., Conclusions: In our experience, ICL implantation in moderate and high ametropia was effective and relatively safe. The most common late complication was cataract formation. This complication can be managed effectively surgically with good refractive outcomes without loss of BCVA., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Aim: to comparatively investigate accommodation, pseudoaccommodation, and higher-order aberrations in children and young adults with myopia and hyperopia., Material and Methods: A total of 39 myopic (the mean error of (-)5.2±1.5 diopters) and 53 hyperopic (the mean error of (+)3.1±1.15 diopters) eyes of 46 patients aged 5-20 years (11.6±0.6 years on average) were enrolled. Examination included evaluation of the objective accommodative response, relative accommodation reserves, pseudoaccommodation volume (calculated as the difference between the (+)3.0-diopter lens that is necessary for cycloplegic reading at a 33-cm distance and the weakest possible plus lens that enables reading), and higher-order aberrations (HOA), particularly the root mean square (RMS) value, vertical and horizontal trefoil, vertical and horizontal coma (coma7, coma8), and spherical aberration (SA)., Results: Both objective and subjective parameters of accommodation were reliably lower in myopia as compared to hyperopia, while wavefront aberrations (RMS HOA, vertical trefoil, coma7) and pseudoaccommodation - reliably greater. SA was found to be reliably more pronounced in those myopes, who demonstrated larger volume of pseudoaccommodation. At the same time, there was a mismatch in wavefront parameters of myopes and hyperopes at different levels of accommodation and pseudoaccommodation. In myopic eyes, vertical trefoil decreased down to negative values as the accommodative response improved. In contrast to that, in hyperopic eyes with large volume of pseudoaccommodation, SA decreased below zero., Conclusion: Myopia has been shown to be associated with reduced accommodation parameters as well as stronger HOA and pseudoaccommodation. Wavefront and accommodation parameters interrelations differ in myopic and hyperopic eyes. The nuances revealed should be taken into account when developing correction methods that purposefully influence refractogenesis.

Purpose: To determine the difference between cycloplegic and non-cycloplegic refractive error and its associated factors in Chinese children and adolescents with a high prevalence of myopia., Methods: A school-based study including 1565 students aged 6 to 21 years was conducted in 2013 in Ejina, Inner Mongolia, China. Comprehensive eye examinations were performed. Pre-and postcycloplegic refractive error were measured using an auto-refractor. For cycloplegic refraction, one drop of topical 1.0% cyclopentolate was administered to each eye twice with a 5-minute interval and a third drop was administered 15 minutes after the second drop if the pupil size was less than 6 mm or if the pupillary light reflex was still present., Results: Two drops of cyclopentolate were found to be sufficient in 59% of the study participants while the other 41% need an additional drop. The prevalence of myopia was 89.5% in participants aged over 12 years and 68.6% in those aged 12 years or younger (P<0.001). When myopia was defined as spherical equivalent (SE) of less than -0.5 diopter (D), the prevalence estimates were 76.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 74.6-78.8) and 54.1% (95%CI 51.6-56.6) before and after cycloplegic refraction, respectively. When hyperopia was defined as SE of more than 0.5D, the prevalence was only 2.8% (95%CI 1.9-3.6) before cycloplegic refraction while it was 15.5% (95%CI 13.7-17.3) after cycloplegic refraction. Increased difference between cycloplegic and non-cycloplegic refractive error was associated with decreased intraocular pressures (P = 0.01)., Conclusions: Lack of cycloplegia in refractive error measurement was associated with significant misclassifications in both myopia and hyperopia among Chinese children and adolescents. Decreased intraocular pressure was related to a greater difference between cycloplegic and non-cycloplegic refractive error., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Purpose: To investigate potential differences in predictability, efficacy, and safety of corneal excimer laser to correct residual myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism in eyes previously implanted with multifocal intraocular lenses using distinct optical surfaces and platforms for multifocality., Methods: This prospective comparative study included 37 eyes submitted to laser in situ keratomileusis correction for residual errors after implantation of either an apodized diffractive-refractive (Restor) or a full-diffractive (Tecnis) multifocal intraocular lens. Data analysis included investigation of predictability, efficacy, and safety of excimer laser surgery to correct residual errors. A double-angle plot, using vector analysis, was also created to evaluate predictability of astigmatism correction., Results: At 6-month follow-up, statistical analyses revealed a significant improvement when comparing preoperative (0.51 ± 0.25 and 0.44 ± 0.18) and postoperative values (0.17 ± 0.10 and 0.09 ± 0.07) of uncorrected distance visual acuity (P < 0.0001 and <0.0001), preoperative (0.92 ± 0.61 and 1.02 ± 0.45) and postoperative values (0.33 ± 0.23 and 0.19 ± 0.17) of manifest refractive spherical equivalent (P = 0.0006 and <0.0001), and preoperative (-1.08 ± 0.70 and -0.65 ± 0.42) and postoperative values (-0.25 ± 0.28 and -0.14 ± 0.21) of astigmatism (P < 0.0001 and <0.0001) in eyes implanted with Restor and Tecnis, respectively. Vector analysis revealed a predictable correction of astigmatism in all groups. Ninety-two percent of total eyes achieved a manifest refractive spherical equivalent within ±0.5 of emmetropia., Conclusions: Corneal excimer laser refractive surgery seems to be equally effective to correct different residual errors, including astigmatism, in eyes implanted with intraocular lenses with various platforms for multifocality.

Background: Myopia subjects usually have long axial lengths and are predisposed to deep anterior chamber depths and open angles. Jiangning eye study is a randomized, population based study in Shanghai to determine whether myopia has an effect on the prevalence of occludable angles., Methods: A total of 2478 residents aged 50 years and over were randomly selected, and 2044 (82.5%) individuals of them participated in ophthalmic examinations between November 2012 and February 2013. Eye examinations included autorefraction, noncontact tonometry, measurement of axial length, anterior chamber depth, lens thickness and spectral domain optical coherence tomography., Results: The crude prevalences of iris trabecular meshwork contact in Jiangning Chinese individuals with myopia, emmetropia, and hyperopia are 1.25%, 6.44%, and 7.43%, respectively. There is also iris trabecular meshwork contact and shallow anterior chamber depth in myopia subjects even with long axial lengths., Conclusions: The prevalence of iris trabecular meshwork contact in myopia subjects is lower than their emmetropia or hyperopia counterparts. Axial length is an important factor associate with occludable angle., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Purpose: The prognosis of success with vision therapy in refractive "amblyopia" associated with the syndrome of myelinated nerve fibers (MRNF), optic disc hypoplasia, and myopia is reported to be poorer than that of anisomyopic amblyopia without these features. The reason for the poorer prognosis has not been well understood. The purpose of this study was to perform spectral domain (SD) ocular coherence tomography (OCT) to determine if there is a structural etiology that may explain the poorer prognosis., Case Reports: Case 1 was a 12-year-old male patient with anisometropic "amblyopia" in the right eye, MRNF denser superiorly, a hypoplastic disc, and a myopic fundus with a flat intact macula. The OCT demonstrated an attenuated photoreceptor integrity line (PIL) in the macula. Case 2 was a 10-year-old male patient with a constant left esotropia, MRNF denser superiorly, a hypoplastic disc, and a myopic fundus with a flat intact macula. The OCT demonstrated an absent PIL. Case 3 was a 58-year-old female patient with a history of diabetic retinopathy OU, long-standing reduced vision in the right eye, MRNF denser superiorly, optic nerve hypoplasia, and a myopic fundus with an intact macula. The OCT demonstrated an absent PIL in the macula., Conclusions: This case series identifies three patients with the syndrome of MRNF, optic nerve hypoplasia, and anisomyopia in one eye with reduced vision and reports OCT findings using SD-OCT systems. All three patients demonstrated an absence or attenuation of the photoreceptor integrity line (PIL) in the macula in the affected eye. To our knowledge, there is no known association between this syndrome and abnormality of the PIL reported in the literature. Patients with this syndrome may have a guarded prognosis in the success of vision therapy.

Importance: Large-scale generic studies offer detailed information on potential risk factors for refractive error across the life course, but ophthalmic examination in such cases to determine the refractive error phenotype is challenging and costly. Thus, refractive status is commonly assigned using questionnaires. In a population survey, often only a few condition-specific self-reported questions can be included, so the questions used must be effective in ruling in those who have the trait of interest and ruling out those who do not., Objective: To determine the accuracy of identification of refractive status using self-reported age at and/or reason for first use of glasses or contact lenses (optical correction)., Design, Setting, and Participants: The UK Biobank study, a cross-sectional epidemiologic study, included 117 278 participants aged 40 to 69 years in 6 regional centers in England and Wales. Data for the present study were assessed from June 2009 to July 2010. Patients underwent autorefraction measurement. Spherical equivalent in the more extreme eye was used to categorize myopia (-1.00 diopter [D] or more extreme) and hypermetropia (+1.00 D or more extreme)., Main Outcomes and Measures: Sensitivity and specificity of the reason for optical correction were assessed using autorefraction as the gold standard. Receiver operating characteristic curves assessed the accuracy of self-reported age at first use of optical correction and incremental improvement with addition of the reason., Results: Of the 95 240 participants who reported using optical correction (55.6% female; mean [SD] age, 57.7 [7.5] years), 92 121 (96.7%) provided their age at first use and 93 156 (97.8%) provided the reason. For myopia, sensitivity of the reason for optical correction was 89.1% (95% CI, 88.7%-89.4%), specificity was 83.7% (95% CI, 83.4%-84.0%), and positive and negative predictive values were 72.7% (95% CI, 72.2%-73.1%) and 94.0% (95% CI, 93.8%-94.2%), respectively. The area under the curve was 0.829 (95% CI, 0.826-0.831) and improved to 0.928 (95% CI, 0.926-0.930) with combined information. By contrast, self-report of the reason for optical correction of hypermetropia had low sensitivity (38.1%; 95% CI, 37.6%-38.6%), and the area under the curve with combined information was 0.713 (95% CI, 0.709-0.716)., Conclusions and Relevance: In combination, self-report of the reason for and age at first use of optical correction are accurate in identifying myopia. These findings indicate an agreed set of questions could be implemented effectively in large-scale generic population-based studies to increase opportunities for integrated research on refractive error leading to development of novel prevention or treatment strategies.

Background: The PlusOptix photoscreeners (PlusOptix GmbH, Nuremberg, Germany) is used in many vision screening programs. The purpose of the present study was to further explore the accuracy of the PlusOptix A09 photoscreener in children with ametropia (myopia or hyperopia)., Methods: A total of 70 eyes (35 children) were prospectively included. Before administration with the cycloplegia treatment 1 % cyclopentolate hydrochloride, children underwent refraction measurement with the PlusOptix A09. A refraction was then performed after cycloplegia with either Retinomax hand-held or Nidek autorefractor before and after 3 years old, respectively., Results: The median (interquartile range) age was 58 (18 to 86) months. The mean (SD) spherical equivalent differed between PlusOptix A09 and cycloplegic autorefraction (+0.54 [1.82] D vs +1.06 [2.04] D, p = 0.04). PlusOptix A09 refraction was positively correlated with cycloplegic autorefraction (r = 0.81, p < 0.001) with higher coefficient in myopic than in hyperopic children (r = 0.91, p = 0.0002 and r = 0.52, p = 0.01, respectively). The mean (SD) difference between PlusOptix A09 and cycloplegic autorefraction was higher with hyperopia than myopia (0.73 [1.34] vs 0.05 [0.66], p = 0.01). The proportion of children with < 1-D difference between cycloplegic and PlusOptix A09 refraction was 68.8 %, higher with myopia than hyperopia (90 % vs 54.5 %, p = 0.01)., Conclusion: The spherical equivalent value with non-cycloplegic PlusOptix A09 refraction is closer to that with cycloplegic autorefraction than non-cycloplegic autorefraction. The PlusOptix A09 photoscreener underestimated the hyperopia of 0.73 D and slightly overestimated myopia of 0.05 D. The PlusOptix A09 could be used for screening with higher accuracy in myopic than hyperopic children.