Search

Aims: Recent evidence suggest that the lipoprotein(a)-associated risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) may be observed only in individuals with low-grade systemic inflammation. It was hypothesized that high lipoprotein(a) is a main driver for the risk of ASCVD, myocardial infarction, and aortic valve stenosis irrespective of C-reactive protein levels., Methods and Results: A total of 68 090 individuals from the Copenhagen General Population Study, a prospective cohort study, were included. During a median follow-up of 8.1 years, 5104 individuals developed ASCVD, 2432 myocardial infarction, and 1220 aortic valve stenosis. The risk of ASCVD, myocardial infarction, and aortic valve stenosis increased with higher values of both lipoprotein(a) and C-reactive protein. For individuals with lipoprotein(a) in the 91st-100th percentiles (≥70 mg/dl, ≥147 nmol/l) vs. the 1st-33rd percentiles (≤6 mg/dl, ≤9 nmol/l), the multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio for ASCVD was 1.61 (95% confidence interval 1.43-1.81) for those with C-reactive protein <2 mg/l and 1.57 (1.36-1.82) for those with C-reactive protein ≥2 mg/l (P for interaction = 0.87). The corresponding values were 2.08 (1.76-2.45) and 1.65 (1.34-2.04) for myocardial infarction, and 2.01 (1.59-2.55) and 1.73 (1.31-2.27) for aortic valve stenosis, respectively (P for interaction = 0.15 and = 0.18). The highest absolute 10-year risks were found in men aged 70-79 years with lipoprotein(a) levels in the 91st-100th percentiles and C-reactive protein ≥2 mg/l, with 34% for ASCVD, 19% for myocardial infarction, and 13% for aortic valve stenosis. The corresponding values in women were 20%, 10%, and 8%, respectively., Conclusion: High lipoprotein(a) was a main driver for the risk of ASCVD, myocardial infarction, and aortic valve stenosis independent of C-reactive protein levels., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest: B.G.N. reports consultancies with Akcea, Amarin, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Denka, Kowa, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Regeneron, Esperion, and Silence Therapeutics. P.R.K. reports lecture honoraria or consultancies from Physicians’ Academy for Cardiovascular Education, Silence Therapeutics, and Novartis. P.E.T. and S.V.-K. declare no conflicts of interest., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

[Figure: see text].

Background: Individuals with obesity have higher concentrations of very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol and increased risk of myocardial infarction. We hypothesized that VLDL cholesterol explains a fraction of the excess myocardial infarction risk in individuals with obesity., Methods: We included 29 010 individuals free of myocardial infarction at baseline, nested within 109 751 individuals from the Copenhagen General Population Study. During 10 years of follow-up, 2306 individuals developed myocardial infarction. Cholesterol content in large and small VLDLs, in intermediate-density lipoprotein (IDL), and in LDL was measured directly with nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy., Results: Median concentrations of cholesterol in large and small VLDLs were 0.12 mmol/L (interquartile range [IQR], 0.07-0.20 mmol/L; 4.5 mg/dL [IQR, 2.6-6.9 mg/dL]) and 0.6 mmol/L (IQR, 0.5-0.8 mmol/L; 25 mg/dL [IQR, 20-30 mg/dL]) in individuals with obesity vs 0.06 mmol/L (IQR, 0.03-0.1 mmol/L; 2.2 mg/dL [IQR, 1.1-3.8 mg/dL]), and 0.5 mmol/L (IQR, 0.4-0.6 mmol/L; 20 mg/dL (IQR, 16-25 mg/dL]) in individuals with normal weight; in contrast, concentrations of IDL and LDL cholesterol were similar across body mass index (BMI) categories. Cholesterol in large and small VLDLs combined explained 40% (95% CI, 27%-53%) of the excess risk of myocardial infarction associated with higher BMI. In contrast, IDL and LDL cholesterol did not explain excess risk of myocardial infarction, whereas systolic blood pressure explained 17% (11%-23%) and diabetes mellitus explained 8.6% (3.2%-14%)., Conclusions: VLDL cholesterol explains a large fraction of excess myocardial infarction risk in individuals with obesity. These novel findings support a focus on cholesterol in VLDL for prevention of myocardial infarction and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in individuals with obesity., (© American Association for Clinical Chemistry 2021. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Aims It is unclear whether higher triglyceride metabolism per se contributes to mortality separate from elevated triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and body mass index. This study tested the hypotheses that higher triglyceride metabolism, measured as higher plasma glycerol and β-hydroxybutyrate, is associated with increased all-cause, cardiovascular, cancer, and other mortality. Methods and results This study included 30 000 individuals nested within 109 751 individuals from the Copenhagen General Population Study. During a median follow-up of 10.7 years, 9897 individuals died (2204 from cardiovascular, 3366 from cancer, and 2745 from other causes), while none were lost to follow-up. In individuals with glycerol >80 µ mol/L (highest fourth) vs. individuals with glycerol <52 µ mol/L (lowest fourth), the multivariable adjusted hazard ratio for all-cause mortality was 1.31 (95% confidence interval 1.22–1.40). In individuals with β-hydroxybutyrate >154 µ mol/L (highest fourth) vs. individuals with β-hydroxybutyrate <91 µ mol/L (lowest fourth), the multivariable adjusted hazard ratio for all-cause mortality was 1.18 (1.11–1.26). Corresponding values for higher plasma glycerol and β-hydroxybutyrate were 1.37 (1.18–1.59) and 1.18 (1.03–1.35) for cardiovascular mortality, 1.24 (1.11–1.39) and 1.16 (1.05–1.29) for cancer mortality, and 1.45 (1.28–1.66) and 1.23 (1.09–1.39) for other mortality, respectively. Results were robust to exclusion of first years of follow-up, to stratification for covariates including plasma triglycerides and body mass index, and to further adjustments. Conclusion This study observed an increased risk of all-cause, cardiovascular, cancer, and other mortality with higher triglyceride metabolism. This was not explained by higher plasma triglycerides and body mass index. The hypothesis studied in the present paper should be further validated by isotope flux studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Women with cardiovascular disease are underdiagnosed, undertreated and under-represented in research. Even though the increased risk of cardiovascular disease among patients with psoriasis is well established, only a few studies have examined women with psoriasis. This study examined the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors and cardiovascular disease among women with psoriasis. Using the Copenhagen City Heart Study and the Copenhagen General Population Study, 66,420 women were included in a cross-sectional design. Of these, 374 (0.56%) women had hospital-diagnosed psoriasis. Women with vs without hospital-diagnosed psoriasis had higher odds ratios of having traditional cardiovascular risk factors, including hypertriglyceridaemia, smoking, obesity, type 2 diabetes, and low physical activity, and of having nontraditional cardiovascular risk factors, including low level of education, high level of psychosocial stress, and lowgrade inflammation. Compared with women from the general population, the multivariable adjusted odds ratio of heart failure and ischaemic cerebrovascular disease in women with hospital-diagnosed psoriasis was 2.51 (95% confidence interval 1.33-4.73) and 2.06 (1.27-3.35). In conclusion, women with hospital-diagnosed psoriasis have a higher prevalence of traditional and nontraditional cardiovascular risk factors, and increased risk of heart failure and ischaemic cerebrovascular disease, even after adjusting for these cardiovascular risk factors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]