Search

The aim of this study was to describe differences in the characteristics and short- and long-term prognoses of patients with first acute myocardial infarction (MI) according to the presence of ST-segment elevation or non-ST-segment elevation. From 2001 and 2003, 2,048 patients with first MI were consecutively admitted to 6 participating Spanish hospitals and categorized as having ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI), non-ST-segment elevation MI (NSTEMI), or unclassified MI (pacemaker or left bundle branch block) according to electrocardiographic results at admission. The proportions of female gender, hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, and diabetes were higher among NSTEMI patients than in the STEMI group. NSTEMI 28-day case fatality was lower (2.99% vs 5.26%, p = 0.02). On multivariate analysis, the odds ratio of 28-day case fatality was 2.23 for STEMI patients compared to NSTEMI patients (95% confidence interval 1.29 to 3.83, p = 0.004). The multivariate adjusted 7-year mortality for 28-day survivors was higher in NSTEMI than in STEMI patients (hazard ratio 1.31, 95% confidence interval 1.02 to 1.68, p = 0.035). However, patients with unclassified MI presented the highest short- and long-term mortality (11.8% and 35.4%, respectively). The excess of short-term mortality in unclassified and STEMI patients was mainly observed in those patients not treated with revascularization procedures. In conclusion, patients with first NSTEMI were older and showed a higher proportion of previous coronary risk factors than STEMI patients. NSTEMI patients had lower 28-day case fatality but a worse 7-year mortality rate than STEMI patients. Unclassified MI presented the worst short- and long-term prognosis. These results support the invasive management of patients with acute coronary syndromes to reduce short-term case fatality., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction and Objectives: In primary angioplasty, the interval between first medical contact (FMC) and reperfusion should be less than 120 minutes. The time to reperfusion varies depending on where FMC is established. Recent studies suggest longer times in patients presenting in off-hours. The objective is to evaluate the time intervals between the onset of symptoms and reperfusion according to where the FMC occurs and time of day of patient presentation., Methods: Prospective observational study of acute myocardial infarction patients treated with primary angioplasty (February 2007 to May 2009). Depending on the FMC, patients were classified as belonging to the hospital group (hospital with primary angioplasty), the transfer group (hospital without primary angioplasty), or the emergency medical system (EMS) group (out-of-hospital care). For each group, the prehospital delay, diagnostic delay, delay in activation and/or transfer, and procedure delay were recorded., Results: Primary angioplasty was performed in 457 patients: 155 in the hospital group, 228 in the transfer group and 72 in the EMS group. The median [interquartile range] door-to-reperfusion times were 80 [63-107], 148 [118-189] and 81 [66-98] minutes, respectively (P<.0001). The transfer group showed a greater delay in diagnosis (P<.0001) and delayed activation and/or transfer (P<.0001). The EMS group had the shortest total time due to a reduced prehospital delay (P=.001). No difference was found with regard to the time of presentation (P=.42)., Conclusions: Transfer group patients were treated later and EMS group patients much earlier. There were no differences in association with the time of presentation. The identification of inappropriate delays should enable the introduction of measures to improve the efficiency of treatment., (Copyright © 2011 Sociedad Española de Cardiología. Published by Elsevier Espana. All rights reserved.)

Background and Objectives: The value of body mass index in the prognosis of patients with ischemic heart disease is not well defined. The objective of our study was to determine the association of body mass index with classic and emergent cardiovascular risk factors and with intra-hospital and 6-months mortality., Patients and Methods: We conducted a prospective, multicenter study with a 6-months follow-up. We included 1063 patients between the ages of 25-75 years old who were consecutively admitted to the hospital within the first 24 hours of the onset of symptoms between years 2001 and 2003. We determined demographic and anthropometric variables, as well as classic and emergent factors of risk, clinical variables and the treatment administered. We carried out a univariate and multivariate analysis., Results: The percentage of patients with overweight or obesity in this population was 73.56%. Overweight and obesity were associated with classical risk factors, except for smoking, and emergent risk factors. Body mass index was not associated with short-or mid-term prognosis., Conclusions: Body mass index is not a useful anthropometric measure to determine the prognosis of patients after a first myocardial infarction., (Copyright © 2009 Elsevier España, S.L. All rights reserved.)

Introduction and Objectives: Treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has changed considerably in recent years. The objective of this study was to investigate differences in in-hospital mortality and 6-month outcomes after a first AMI between patients who participated in two trials, in 1992-1994 and 2001-2003, respectively., Methods: The study involved 1440 consecutive patients with a first AMI who were admitted to four university hospitals during 1992-1994 (the RESCATE-I trial) and 1288 with a first AMI who met the same diagnostic criteria and who were admitted to the same hospitals during 2001-2003 (the RESCATE-II trial). Patient management, in-hospital mortality and 6-month prognosis and outcomes were compared between the two trials., Results: Reperfusion therapy was carried out in 60.7% of patients in the first trial and in 72.6% in the second (P< .001). In the RESCATE-II trial, the median door-to-needle time was shorter (41 min vs. 93 min; P< .001) and patients more frequently underwent coronary angiography (65.2% vs. 28.1%; P< .001) and revascularization (34.9% vs. 8.1%; P< .001). In addition, in-hospital mortality was lower in RESCATE-II (7.5% vs. 10.9%; P< .001). After adjustment for age, sex, comorbidity, AMI severity and reperfusion therapy, the odds ratio for in-hospital mortality in RESCATE-II compared with the first trial was 0.52 (95% confidence interval, 0.31-0.86). In addition, mortality (1.4% vs. 3.6%; P=.001) and readmissions at 6 months were also lower in RESCATE-II., Conclusions: Both in-hospital and 6-month mortality in patients with a first AMI decreased during the last decade, probably due to more frequent reperfusion and revascularization therapy and better medical treatment.

Introduction and Objectives: To determine the prevalence of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) without classical risk factors, and to ascertain whether affected patients exhibit a higher prevalence of emergent risk factors and whether the presence of specific emergent risk factors influence prognosis at 6 months., Methods: The FORTIAM (Factores Ocultos de Riesgo Tras un Infarto Agudo de Miocardio) study is a multicenter cohort study that includes 1371 AMI patients who were admitted within 24 hours of symptom onset. Strict definitions were used for classical risk factors and the concentrations of the following markers were determined: lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)], oxidized low-density lipoprotein (oxLDL), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, fibrinogen, homocysteine and antibody to Chlamydia. The end-points observed during the 6-month follow-up were death, angina and re-infarction., Results: The prevalence of AMI without classical risk factors was 8.0%. The absence of classical risk factors did not affect the 6-month prognosis. The only emergent risk factors independently associated with a poorer prognosis were the Lp(a) and oxLDL concentrations. Cut-points were determined using smoothing splines: 60 mg/ dL for Lp(a) and 74 U/L for oxLDL. The associated hazard ratios, adjusted for age, sex and classical risk factors, were 1.40 (95% confidence interval, 1.06-1.84 ) and 1.48 (95% confidence interval, 1.06-2.06), respectively., Conclusions: The proportion of AMI patients without classical risk factors was low and their prognosis was similar to that in other AMI patients. Both oxLDL and Lp(a) concentrations were independently associated with a poorer 6-month prognosis, irrespective of the presence of classical risk factors.

Introduction and Objectives: Risk stratification in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome makes use of clinical variables that can identify patients at an increased risk of complications. Our objective was to identify clinical variables that predict significant stenosis (i.e., >50%) of the left main coronary artery in high-risk patients who have had a first episode of non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome but who do not have a history of coronary artery disease., Methods: The study included 102 high-risk patients with no history of coronary artery disease who were admitted because of non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome. All underwent coronary angiography. Patients were divided into two groups: those with significant left main coronary artery stenosis (n=14) and those without (n=88)., Results: Univariate analysis showed that the variables significantly associated with left main coronary artery stenosis were age >65 years (57.1% vs 15.9%, P=.002), diabetes mellitus (71.4% vs 33.0%, P=.006), chronic renal failure (28.6% vs 5.7%, P=.019), left heart failure (71.4% vs 6.8%, P< .0001), cardiogenic shock (21.4% vs 1.1%, P=.008), and a low left ventricular ejection fraction at admission (49.9% [14.7%] vs 58.8% [9.9%], P=.044). In the multivariate analysis, the only significant independent predictor of left main coronary artery disease was left heart failure., Conclusions: The presence of left heart failure at initial assessment of high-risk patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome but without a history of coronary artery disease could be a useful predictor of significant left main coronary artery disease.

The type of acute coronary syndrome may account for different prognoses between men and women after myocardial infarction. This study assessed gender differences in 28-day mortality rates for first or recurrent Q-wave and non-Q-wave myocardial infarctions and unstable angina by using data from 5 registries that included 20,836 patients (24.8% women). Mortality rates were higher in women with first Q-wave myocardial infarction but not in the other patients after adjusting for confounding variables.

The aim of this study was to assess the clinical course of unstable angina and the prognostic value of clinical and electrocardiographic variables measured during admission in a prospective, multicenter cohort study with 6-month follow-up. The population corresponds to 4 general teaching hospitals in Catalonia, Spain. The clinical course was analyzed in 839 consecutive patients aged up to 80 years with primary unstable angina, without myocardial infarction or previous coronary bypass. The main outcome measures were cardiac mortality and nonfatal myocardial infarction. Patients involved in the present analysis belonged to the Resources Used in Acute Coronary Syndromes and Delays in Treatment (RESCATE) study. Six-month overall mortality, cardiac mortality, and nonfatal myocardial infarction rates were 4.6%, 4.1%, and 3.9%, respectively. Six-month cardiac mortality or myocardial infarction rate did not differ among clinical forms of presentation. Peripheral artery disease (RR 3.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.88 to 6.50, p = 0.0001), ST-T-wave electrocardiographic changes on admission (RR 2.22, 95% CI 1.13 to 4.36, p = 0.0203), and age >65 years (RR 1.74, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.91, p = 0.0356) independently predicted 6-month cardiac mortality or nonfatal myocardial infarction. Their positive predictive values were 21%, 10%, and 11%, respectively, whereas their negative predictive value was > or = 93% in all cases. Prevalences were 9%, 70%, and 41%, respectively. In this prospective study, patients with unstable angina without prior myocardial infarction have a relatively low, although not negligible, 6-month severe complication rate. Stratification risk can easily be established with clinical and electrocardiographic characteristics measured during admission. Their absence almost rules out future adverse events, while their presence does not necessarily imply bad prognosis.

Context: Mortality after acute myocardial infarction is worse in women than in men, even after adjustment for comorbidity and age dissimilarities between sexes., Objective: To assess the influence of sex on survival after acute myocardial infarction., Design: Inception cohort obtained in a prospective registry of patients with acute myocardial infarction from 1992 through 1994., Setting: Four teaching hospitals in northeastern Spain., Patients: All consecutive patients aged 80 years or younger with first acute myocardial infarction. A total of 331 women and 1129 men were included., Main Outcome Measure: Survival at 28 days and mortality or readmission at 6 months., Results: Women were older (mean, 68.6 vs 60.1 years), presented more often with diabetes (52.9% vs 23.3%), hypertension (63.9% vs 42.3%), or previous angina (44.6% vs 37.4%), and developed more severe myocardial infarctions than men (acute pulmonary edema or cardiogenic shock occurred in 24.8% of women and 10.5% of men) (all P<.02). Men were more likely than women to receive thrombolytic therapy (41.3% vs 23.9%; P<.001), but rates of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and coronary artery bypass graft surgery at 28 days were similar among men and women. The 28-day mortality rate was significantly higher among women (18.5% for women, 8.3% for men; P<.001). Revascularization procedures at 6 months were performed in a similar proportion of women and men. However, women had higher 6-month mortality rates (25.8% in women, 10.8% in men; P<.001) and readmission rates (23.3% for women, 12.2% for men; P<.001). After adjustment, women had greater risk of death than men at 28 days (odds ratio [OR], 1.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12-2.65) and at 6 months (OR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.18-2.52)., Conclusions: In this study population, women experienced more lethal and severe first acute myocardial infarction than men, regardless of comorbidity, age, or previous angina.

Objectives: The aim of the present study was to ascertain whether the degree of accessibility to coronary angiography and revascularization results in differing usages or outcomes, or both, in the setting of a high coverage national health system., Background: The selective use of coronary angiography and revascularization procedures in the management of acute myocardial infarction (MI) remains controversial., Methods: A cohort of 1,460 consecutive patients with a first MI admitted to four referral teaching hospitals (one with tertiary facilities) were followed up for 6 months after admission. Only patients initially admitted to each of the study hospitals were retained for analysis in the original hospital's cohort. End points were 6-month mortality and readmission for reinfarction, unstable angina, heart failure or severe ventricular arrhythmia., Results: Patients admitted to the tertiary hospital were more likely to undergo coronary angiography (adjusted relative risk 4.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.37 to 5.45) than those admitted to the nontertiary sites (use rate: 22.1% for nontertiary care, 55.5% for tertiary care). Revascularization procedures were performed in 21.2% of patients in the tertiary hospital and in 8.3% in the nontertiary hospitals (p < 0.0001). Median delay for emergency coronary angiography was shorter in the tertiary hospital (within 1 vs. 2 days, p < 0.0001). Six-month mortality or readmission rates were similar (23.7% and 24.7% for tertiary and nontertiary care, respectively). After adjustment for comorbidity and disease severity, the relative risk of death or readmission for the tertiary hospital was 1.03 (95% CI 0.69 to 1.53) times that of the nontertiary hospitals., Conclusions: Selective use of coronary angiography and revascularization procedures may be as effective as less restricted use in the management of acute MI.

We investigated the clinical, electrocardiographic and hemodynamic features and the prognostic implications of early spontaneous angina in 31 consecutive patients after acute myocardial infarction. Re-elevation of ST segments in the area of infarction occurred during angina and during reinfarction in all but one patient. Depression of ST segments, when present during pain, involved the same leads as in the acute infarction. Blood pressure and double product tended to increase during pain in 23 patients. The magnitude of this change, however, often varied from crisis to crisis and there were no increases in these parameters in one or more attacks in 15 patients. Sublingual nitroglycerin, 1.0 mg, failed to relieve one or all anginal episodes in 17 of the 28 patients in whom it was given. In-hospital mortality rate was 10% (3/31) and always followed reinfarction. In-hospital reinfarction rate was 16% (5/31) and followed a larger number of anginal crises (7.2 +/- 1.3 vs 3.0 +/- 2.1, P less than 0.001) and a higher incidence of transient hypotensive episodes than in the rest of patients (3/5 vs 3/26). Three additional patients died after discharge. Of the remaining 25 patients and during a follow-up of 26 months (16-34) only one developed reinfarction. Early resting angina after a transmural infarction is almost invariably associated with ECG evidence of ischemia in the leads overlying the infarcted zone. The inconsistent changes in blood pressure and heart rate during pain render these hemodynamic changes an unlikely cause of this form of angina. While postinfarction angina did not carry a grave short- or long-term prognosis, patients with recurrent crises demonstrated as high a risk of reinfarction and death as those with spontaneous hypotension.

The relationship between ST segment elevation on the right precordial lead V4R and the hemodynamic, echocardiographic, and myocardial scintigrapic signs suggestive of right ventricular (RV) infarction was studied in 42 patients with acute inferior myocardial infarction. Twenty-two patients had ST segment elevation in V4R. Among these patients, a significant correlation was demonstrated between V4R ST segment elevation and the hemodynamic (p less than 0.001), scintigraphic (p less than 0.001), and echographic (p less than 0.02) criteria for acute RV infarction. These results support the validity of this new electrocardiographic sign as a practical means in aiding the clinical detection of RV involvement with acute transmural inferior myocardial infarction.

A case of post-traumatic coronary occlusion is presented. A 38-year-old sustained a blunt chest trauma with secondary transmural infarct and early evolution toward a huge left ventricular aneurysm. Coronary arteriography showed complete occlusion to the left anterior descending coronary artery.

The article reports that some patients with myocardial infarction (Ml) have no classical cardiovascular risk factor (CRF), such as smoking, hypercholesterolaemia, hypertension, or diabetes. It states that emerging risk factors (ERF) such as fibrinogen, lipoprotein, C reactive protein, antibodies against Chlamydia pneumoniae and homocystein may play a role in patients without CRF. Researchers conducted a study to analyze whether ERF may explain the occurrence of Ml in these patients. Researchers concluded that patients with Ml and no CRF have higher levels of ERF compared with general population without CRF. This finding suggests that ERF may have a role in the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis and Ml in men.