Search

Background: Morphine is recommended in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, including those undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Suboptimal antiplatelet effect during and after primary percutaneous coronary intervention is associated with increased thrombotic complications. It was hypothesized a potential drug-drug interaction between morphine and antiplatelet agents. We sought to assess platelet inhibition after a loading dose of the currently recommended antiplatelet agents in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction patients according to morphine use., Methods and Results: Three hundred patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention receiving either prasugrel (n = 95) or ticagrelor (n = 205) loading dose had platelet reactivity assessed by VerifyNow 1, 2, and 4 hours after loading dose. Patients treated with morphine (n = 95; 32%) had a higher incidence of vomit (15% versus 2%; P = 0.001). P2Y12 reactivity units 2 hours after the loading dose was 187 (153-221) and 133 (102-165) in patient with and without morphine (P < 0.001); the difference persisted after excluding patients with vomit (P < 0.0001). High residual platelet reactivity (P2Y12 reactivity units ≥ 208) at 2 hours was found in 53% and 29% patients with and without morphine (P < 0.001) and without difference between prasugrel and ticagrelor patients. The independent predictors of high residual platelet reactivity at 2 hours were morphine use (odds ratio, 2.91 [1.71-4.97]; P < 0.0001) and age (odds ratio, 1.03 [1.01-1.05]; P = 0.010). Morphine remained associated with high residual platelet reactivity after propensity score adjustment (c-statistic, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.66-0.70; P = 0.879 for Hosmer-Lemeshow test)., Conclusions: In patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, morphine use is associated with a delayed onset of action of the oral antiplatelet agents. This association persisted after adjusting for the propensity to receive morphine and after excluding patients with vomit., (© 2014 American Heart Association, Inc.)

Aims: Little is known about the use of bivalirudin in "real life". In the context of contemporary antiplatelet treatment, we aimed to assess bivalirudin treatment patterns and short-term (one-month) outcome., Methods: Greek Antiplatelet Registry (GRAPE) is a prospective, observational, multicenter cohort study of consecutive, moderate-to-high-risk acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We assessed bivalirudin treatment patterns and predictive factors for its use. Combined in-hospital and one-month major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE, including death, myocardial infarction, urgent revascularization, and stroke), and bleeding events according to Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) criteria were analyzed after propensity matching., Results: Of 2047 registered patients, 480 (23.4%) were treated with bivalirudin. Multivariate analysis (C statistic 0.77, 0.75-0.80 95% CIs, P < 0.001) revealed as factors favoring bivalirudin use primary PCI, radial arterial access, presentation with positive biomarkers and use of novel P2Y12 inhibitor, whereas IIb/IIIa inhibitor administration did not. Regional trends also affected bivalirudin's choice. In 370 propensity-matched pairs of patients who received or not bivalirudin, MACE, BARC type 1, 2 and 3 did not differ between groups: 4.1%, 21.9%, 3.2%, 3.5% and 5.1%, 18.9%, 2.7%, 4.3%, respectively, P = nonsignificant for all., Conclusions: In a "real life", contemporary antiplatelet treatment registry, clinical, laboratory and logistic factors affect bivalirudin's choice, while there are no differences in one-month outcome between bivalirudin-treated and non-bivalirudin-treated patients., (© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)