Search

Aims: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) versus bare metal stent (BMS) implantation in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) at long-term follow-up., Methods and Results: After five years, 310 STEMI patients randomly assigned to implantation of either SES or BMS, were compared. Survival rates were comparable between groups (SES 94.3% vs. BMS 92.8%, p=0.57), as were the rates of reinfarction (10.6% vs. 13.7%, p=0.40), freedom of death/re-MI (84.4% vs. 79.8%, p=0.29) and target vessel failure (14.9% vs. 21.7%, p=0.11). Likewise, rates of overall stent thrombosis (ST) (5.4% vs. 2.7%, p=0.28) and very late ST (4.1% vs. 0.7%, p=0.07) did not significantly differ between the SES- and BMS-group. In 184 patients with IVUS data, definite and definite/probable VLST was more common in those with late stent malapposition versus those without late stent malapposition (4.3% and 6.6% vs. no events [p=0.018 and p=0.004], respectively). The cumulative incidences of target vessel and target lesion revascularisation (TVR and TLR) were not significantly lower in the SES-group (11.2% vs. 17.9%, p=0.09 and 7.2% vs. 12.9%, p=0.08), as was the rate of clinically driven TLR (6.6% vs. 9.5%, p=0.30)., Conclusions: SES implantation was neither associated with increased rates of major adverse cardiac events, nor with a reduction in re-intervention, compared to implantation of a BMS in patients with STEMI after five years. However, a trend of more very late stent thrombosis was observed after SES implantation (ISRCTN62825862).

Objectives: Our purpose was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting stents in the setting of primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)., Background: There is inconsistent and limited evidence about the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting stents in STEMI patients., Methods: A single-blind, single-center, randomized study was performed to compare bare-metal stents (BMS) with sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) in 310 STEMI patients. The primary end point was in-segment late luminal loss (LLL) at 9 months. Secondary end points included late stent malapposition (LSM) at 9 months as determined by intravascular ultrasound imaging and clinical events at 12 months., Results: In-segment LLL was 0.68 +/- 0.57 mm in the BMS group and 0.12 +/- 0.43 mm in the SES group with a mean difference of 0.56 mm, 95% confidence interval 0.43 to 0.68 mm (p < 0.001). Late stent malapposition at 9 months was present in 12.5% BMS patients and in 37.5% SES patients (p < 0.001). Event-free survival at 12 months was 73.6% in BMS patients and 86.0% in SES patients (p = 0.01). The target-vessel-failure-free survival was 84.7% in the BMS group and 93.0% in the SES group (p = 0.02), mainly because of a higher target lesion revascularization rate in BMS patients (11.3% vs. 3.2%; p = 0.006). Rates of death, myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis were not different., Conclusions: Sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in STEMI patients is associated with a favorable midterm clinical and angiographic outcome compared with treatment with BMS. However, LSM raises concern about the long-term safety of SES in STEMI patients.

Objectives: This study sought to determine whether hyperoxemic reperfusion with aqueous oxygen (AO) improves recovery of ventricular function after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI)., Background: Hyperbaric oxygen reduces myocardial injury and improves ventricular function when administered during ischemia-reperfusion., Methods: In a prospective, multicenter study, 269 patients with acute anterior or large inferior AMI undergoing primary or rescue PCI (<24 h from symptom onset) were randomly assigned after successful PCI to receive hyperoxemic reperfusion (treatment group) or normoxemic blood autoreperfusion (control group). Hyperoxemic reperfusion was performed for 90 min using intracoronary AO. The primary end points were final infarct size at 14 days, ST-segment resolution, and delta regional wall motion score index of the infarct zone at 3 months., Results: At 30 days, the incidence of major adverse cardiac events was similar between the control and AO groups (5.2% vs. 6.7%, p = 0.62). There was no significant difference in the incidence of the primary end points between the study groups. In post-hoc analysis, anterior AMI patients reperfused <6 h who were treated with AO had a greater improvement in regional wall motion (delta wall motion score index = 0.54 in control group vs. 0.75 in AO group, p = 0.03), smaller infarct size (23% of left ventricle in control group vs. 9% of left ventricle in AO group, p = 0.04), and improved ST-segment resolution compared with normoxemic controls., Conclusions: Intracoronary hyperoxemic reperfusion was safe and well tolerated after PCI for AMI, but did not improve regional wall motion, ST-segment resolution, or final infarct size. A possible treatment effect was observed in anterior AMI patients reperfused <6 h of symptom onset.

Background: Guideline implementation programs for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) enhance adherence to evidence-based medicine (EBM) and improve clinical outcome. Although undertreatment of patients with AMI is well recognized in both acute and chronic phases of care, most implementation programs focus on acute and secondary prevention strategies during the index hospitalization phase only., Hypothesis: Implementation of an all-phase integrated AMI care program maximizes EBM in daily practice and improves the care for patients with AMI., Aim: The objective of this study is to assess the effects of the MISSION! program on adherence to EBM for patients with AMI by the use of performance indicators., Design: The MISSION! protocol is based on the most recent American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association and European Society of Cardiology guidelines for patients with AMI. It contains a prehospital, inhospital, and outpatient clinical framework for decision making and treatment, up to 1 year after the index event. MISSION! concentrates on rapid AMI diagnosis and early reperfusion, followed by active lifestyle improvement and structured medical therapy. Because MISSION! covers both acute and chronic AMI phase, this design implies an intensive multidisciplinary collaboration among all regional health care providers., Conclusion: Continuum of care for patients with AMI is warranted to take full advantage of EBM in day-to-day practice. This manuscript describes the rationale, design, and preliminary results of MISSION!, an all-phase integrated AMI care program.

Electron beam computed tomographic studies have demonstrated that the extent of intracoronary calcium is related to risk of coronary events. This study was performed to gain further insight into the distribution of focal calcifications and their relation to the site of plaque rupture within the culprit artery in consecutive patients (n = 60) with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) using intravascular ultrasound imaging. Calcifications in the culprit lesion and adjacent segments were classified and counted according to their arc (< 45 degrees, 45 degrees to 90 degrees, 90 degrees to 180 degrees, > 180 degrees), length (< 1.5, 1.5 to 3.0, 3.0 to 6.0, > 6.0 mm), and dispersion (number of spots per millimeter). Calcifications at the edge of a visible rupture or ulceration were considered related to the AMI. Compared with adjacent proximal and distal segments, the culprit lesion contained more calcified spots per millimeter (0.14, 0.10, and 0.21, respectively, p < 0.05). Small calcified spots (arc < 45 degrees, length < 1.5 mm) were more common (p < 0.05). Plaque rupture or ulceration was manifest in 31 culprit lesions (52%), 14 (45%) of which contained focal calcifications. These calcified spots extended more often to 90 degrees to 180 degrees of the vessel circumference and were more often of moderate length (3 to 6 mm) compared with culprit lesions without visible plaque rupture (p < 0.05). In conclusion, culprit lesions in patients with AMI contain more and smaller calcifications compared with adjacent segments. Calcifications related to plaque rupture appear to be larger and extend over a wider arc compared with these calcified spots. Those larger calcified spots may play a role in plaque instability in a subgroup of lesions.

Adjunctive use of abciximab during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) improves clinical outcome. This study addresses the outcome of patients with AMI treated with abciximab, initiated either before transport to a PCI center (early group) or immediately upon arrival at the catheterization laboratory (late group) for primary PCI. Of 446 consecutive patients with AMI, angiographic data and clinical complications were evaluated up to 6 months after primary PCI. Patients received abciximab before transport (early group; n = 138) or just before the intervention (late group; n = 308). Baseline data, including transport time (45 +/- 15 min; range, 15-60 min), were comparable in both groups. Early reperfusion was more prevalent in the early group (35% vs. late 19%; P < 0.001). Furthermore, a better final TIMI 3 flow was noted in the early group (91% vs. late 83%; P = 0.05). Although mortality reduction attributable to early abciximab treatment could not be demonstrated, major adverse cardiac events (MACE) occurred in 27% in the early group and 36% in the late group (P = 0.05). Revascularization rates were similar, but repeat acute coronary syndromes were less frequent in the early group (11% vs. late group 20%; P = 0.04). In multivariate analysis, cardiogenic shock, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, and previously known coronary artery disease were independent predictors of higher MACE rate, whereas early reperfusion and final TIMI 3 flow reduced 6-month MACE rate. Abciximab pretreatment of patients with AMI for primary PCI results in better initial and final TIMI flow and tends to improve 6-month clinical outcome.

The present report describes outcomes of randomized selective intracoronary aqueous oxygen versus standard care in patients who had acute anterior wall myocardial infarction within 6 hours of onset (n = 50). Left ventricular (LV) dimensions and function were assessed by contrast echocardiography at baseline and 1 month. It is demonstrated that aqueous oxygen prevents LV remodeling and preserves LV ejection fraction.

Objectives: This study sought to determine whether hyperoxemic reperfusion with aqueous oxygen (AO) improves recovery of ventricular function after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Background: Hyperbaric oxygen reduces myocardial injury and improves ventricular function when administered during ischemia-reperfusion. Methods: In a prospective, multicenter study, 269 patients with acute anterior or large inferior AMI undergoing primary or rescue PCI (<24 h from symptom onset) were randomly assigned after successful PCI to receive hyperoxemic reperfusion (treatment group) or normoxemic blood autoreperfusion (control group). Hyperoxemic reperfusion was performed for 90 min using intracoronary AO. The primary end points were final infarct size at 14 days, ST-segment resolution, and Δ regional wall motion score index of the infarct zone at 3 months. Results: At 30 days, the incidence of major adverse cardiac events was similar between the control and AO groups (5.2% vs. 6.7%, p = 0.62). There was no significant difference in the incidence of the primary end points between the study groups. In post-hoc analysis, anterior AMI patients reperfused <6 h who were treated with AO had a greater improvement in regional wall motion (Δ wall motion score index = 0.54 in control group vs. 0.75 in AO group, p = 0.03), smaller infarct size (23% of left ventricle in control group vs. 9% of left ventricle in AO group, p = 0.04), and improved ST-segment resolution compared with normoxemic controls. Conclusions: Intracoronary hyperoxemic reperfusion was safe and well tolerated after PCI for AMI, but did not improve regional wall motion, ST-segment resolution, or final infarct size. A possible treatment effect was observed in anterior AMI patients reperfused <6 h of symptom onset. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]