Search

Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) represents one of the strongest predictors of both in-hospital and long-term prognosis in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Temporal trends data coming from real-world experiences focused on patients with AMI with severely reduced LVEF (i.e., <30%) are lacking. In a total of 48,543 screened patients with AMI included in the Acute Myocardial Infarction in Switzerland Plus Registry between 2005 and 2020, data on LVEF were available for 23,510 patients. Study patients were classified according to LVEF as patients with AMI with or without severely reduced LVEF (i.e., patients with LVEF <30% and ≥30%, respectively). Overall, 1,657 patients with AMI (7%) displayed severely reduced LVEF. The prevalence of severe LVEF reduction constantly decreased over the study period (from 11% to 4%, p <0.001). In the subgroup of patients with severely reduced LVEF, a significant increase in revascularization rate was observed (from 61% to 84%, p <0.001); however, in-hospital mortality did not significantly decrease and remained well above 20% over the study period (from 23% to 26%, p = 0.65). At discharge, prescription of optimal cardioprotective therapy (defined as an association of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system inhibitors, β-blocker, and mineral corticoid receptor antagonist) remained low across the study period (from 17% in 2011 to 20%, p = 0.96). In conclusion, patients with AMI with severely reduced LVEF remain a fragile subgroup of patients with an in-hospital mortality that did not significantly decrease and remained well above 20% over the study period. Moreover, access at discharge to optimal cardioprotective therapy remains suboptimal. Efforts are, therefore, needed to improve prognosis and access to guidelines-directed therapies in this fragile population., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Dr. Rickli reports institutional research grants from Biotronik, Boston, Braun, Terumo, and Medtronic, all outside the submitted work. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Despite guideline recommendations, previous reports, coming mainly from outside Europe, showed low rates of prescriptions for dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) undergoing surgical revascularization. The present study assesses this issue in the era of potent P2Y12 inhibitors in Switzerland., Methods: All patients with a diagnosis of AMI included in the Acute Myocardial Infarction in Switzerland Plus Registry from January 2014 to December 2019 were screened; 9050 patients undergoing either percutaneous (8727, 96.5%) or surgical (323, 3.5%) revascularization were included in the analysis., Results: Surgically treated patients were significantly less likely to receive DAPT at discharge (56.3% vs 96.7%; P < 0.001). Even when discharged with a prescription for DAPT, those patients were significantly less likely to receive a regimen containing a new P2Y12 inhibitor (67/182 [36.8%] vs 6945/8440 [83.2%]; P < 0.001). At multivariate analysis, surgical revascularization was independently associated with a lower likelihood of receiving a prescription for DAPT at discharge (odds ratio 0.03, 95% confidence interval 0.02-0.06)., Conclusions: DAPT prescriptions for patients with AMI undergoing surgical revascularization are not in line with current guideline recommendations. Efforts are necessary to clarify the role of DAPT for secondary prevention in these patients and increase the confidence of treating physicians in guideline recommendations., Clinical Trial Registration: Acute Myocardial Infarction in Switzerland Plus Registry; registration number at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01305785., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Despite a relative contraindication, mechanical support with Impella™ left ventricular assist device has already been described for ischaemic ventricular septal defect treatment, either as a bridge to surgery, as intraoperative mechanical haemodynamic support, or to ensure intraprocedural haemodynamic stability during device closure. We describe two cases of ventricular septal defect complicating acute myocardial infarction, where the percutaneous ImpellaCP was implanted early (differently than previously described) with the aim of preventing haemodynamic instability, while deferring surgical repair. We present a report of haemodynamic, echocardiographic, biochemical, and clinical data of two consecutive cases of ImpellaCP use, within a minimally invasive monitoring and therapeutic approach. In two cases of subacute myocardial infarction-related ventricular septal defect not amenable to percutaneous device closure, the use ImpellaCP was successful: it was followed by effective and rapid right and left ventricular unloading, by major haemodynamic instability prevention and protection from systemic venous congestion, from kidney and splanchnic organ failures. This allowed bridging to appropriately timed surgical repair. These cases suggest a potentially effective, clinically grounded strategy in the early management of ischaemic ventricular septal defect patients, with the aim of deferring surgery beyond the safer 7 days cutoff associated with a lower perioperative mortality., (© 2020 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.)

Background: The association between alcohol consumption and the occurrence of coronary heart disease is well described in the literature, while data regarding the impact of regular alcohol consumption on in-hospital outcomes in the setting of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are lacking. We aimed to evaluate the impact of self-reported alcohol consumption on in-hospital outcomes in patients with ACS., Methods: Data derived from patients enrolled between 2007 and 2019 in the Acute Myocardial Infarction in Switzerland (AMIS) Plus registry were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were stratified based on alcohol drinking pattern. Primary outcome was all-cause in-hospital mortality, while secondary outcomes were set as incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs). Outcome comparisons according to quantity of daily alcohol intake were also performed., Results: Records concerning alcohol consumption were available in 25,707 patients; 5,298 of them (21%) fulfilled the criteria of regular alcohol consumption. Regular drinkers were predominantly male, younger, smokers, more comorbid and with a worse clinical presentation as compared with abstainers/occasional drinkers. Daily alcohol intake was reported in 4,059 (77%) of these patients (regular drinkers). Among them, 2,640 were light drinkers (≤2 drinks/day) and 1,419 heavy drinkers (>2 drinks/day). In-hospital mortality and MACCEs of heavy drinkers were significantly higher compared with those of light drinkers (5.4 vs. 3.3% and 7.0 vs. 4.4%, both p = 0.001). When tested together with Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events risk score parameters, heavy alcohol consumption was independently associated with in-hospital mortality (p = 0.004)., Conclusions: Our results support that heavy alcohol consumption is an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality in patients presenting with ACS., (© 2020 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Cardiovascular diseases, including heart failure, are the most frequent cause of death annually, even higher than any other pathologies. Specifically, patients who suffer from myocardial infarction may encounter adverse remodeling processes of the heart that can ultimately lead to heart failure. Prognosis of patients affected by heart failure is very poor with 5-year mortality close to 50 %. Despite the impressive progress in the clinical treatment of heart failure in recent years, heart transplantation is still required to avoid death as the result of the inexorable decline in cardiac function. Unfortunately, the availability of donor human hearts for transplantation largely fails to cover the number of potential recipient requests. From this urgent unmet clinical need the interest in stem cell applications for heart regeneration made its start, and has rapidly grown in the last decades. Indeed, the discovery and application of stem and progenitor cells as therapeutic agents has raised substantial interest with the objective of reversing these processes, and ultimately inducing cardiac regeneration. In this scenario, the role of biobanking may play a remarkable role to provide cells at the right time according to the patient's clinical needs, mostly for autologous use in the acute setting of myocardial infarction, largely reducing the time needed for cell preparation and expansion before administration.

BACKGROUND: In patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) with multigrees, vessel coronary artery disease, the time at which complete revascularization of nonculprit lesions should be performed remains unknown. METHODS: We performed an international, open-label, randomized, noninferiority trial at 37 sites in Europe. Patients in a hemodynamically stable condition who had STEMI and multivessel coronary artery disease were randomly assigned to undergo immediate multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI; immediate group) or PCI of the culprit lesion followed by staged multivessel PCI of nonculprit lesions within 19 to 45 days after the index procedure (staged group). The primary end point was a composite of death from any cause, nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, unplanned ischemia-driven revascularization, or hospitalization for heart failure at 1 year after randomization. The percentages of patients with a primary or secondary end-point event are provided as Kaplan-Meier estimates at 6 months and at 1 year. RESULTS: We assigned 418 patients to undergo immediate multivessel PCI and 422 to undergo staged multivessel PCL A primary end-point event occurred in 35 patients (8.590) in the immediate group as compared with 68 patients (16.396) in the staged group (risk ratio, 0.52; 95% confidence interval, 0.38 to 0.72; P<0.001 for noninferiority and P< 0.001 for superiority). Nonfatal myocardial infarction and unplanned ischemia-driven revascularization occurred in 8 patients (2.090) and 17 patients (4.1°6), respectively, in the immediate group and in 22 patients (5.3°6) and 39 patients (9.3°6), respectively, in the staged group. The risk of death from any cause, the risk of stroke, and the risk of hospitalization for heart failure appeared to be similar in the two groups. A total of 104 patients in the immediate group and 145 patients in the staged group had a serious adverse event. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients in hemodynamically stable condition with STEMI and multivessel coronary artery disease, immediate multivessel PCI was noninferior to staged multivessel PCI with respect to the risk of death from any cause, nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, unplanned ischemia-driven revascularization, or hospitalization for heart failure at 1 year. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]