Search

Background: It is unclear how the type of an atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) event potentially influences patients' likelihood of smoking cessation., Methods: Using 2013 to 2018 data from the US based National Cardiovascular Data Registry Practice Innovation and Clinical Excellence outpatient cardiac registry, we identified patients who were current smokers at a clinic visit and followed them over time for a subsequent ASCVD event. Self-reported smoking status was assessed at each consecutive visit and used to determine smoking cessation after each interim ASCVD event (myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass graft, stroke/transient ischemic attack, peripheral artery disease). We constructed separate multivariable Cox models with nonproportional hazards to examine the association of each interim ASCVD event with smoking cessation, compared with not having an interim ASCVD event. We estimated the relative association of ASCVD event type with smoking cessation using contrast tests. Analyses were stratified by presence versus absence of ASCVD at baseline., Results: Across 530 cardiology practices, we identified 1 933 283 current smokers (mean age 62±15, male 54%, ASCVD at baseline 50%). Among the 322 743 patients who had an interim ASCVD event and were still smoking, 41 336 (12.8%) quit smoking by their first subsequent clinic visit, which was higher among those with baseline ASCVD (13.4%) as compared with those without baseline ASCVD (11.5%). Each type of ASCVD event was associated with an increased likelihood of smoking. Patients who had an myocardial infarction, underwent coronary artery bypass graft (hazard ratio, 1.60 [95% CI, 1.55-1.65]), or had a stroke or transient ischemic attack were more likely to quit smoking as compared with those who underwent elective percutaneous coronary intervention or had a new diagnosis of peripheral artery disease (hazard ratio, 1.20 [95% CI, 1.17-1.22])., Conclusions: Only 13% of patients reported smoking cessation after an ASCVD event, with the type of event being associated with the likelihood of smoking cessation, prompting the need for patient-centered interventions., Competing Interests: Disclosures None.

Background: Chronic stress in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD), including peripheral artery disease (PAD), is independently associated worse outcomes. A model that can reliably identify factors associated with risk of chronic stress in patients with CVD is needed., Methods: In a prospective myocardial infarction (MI) registry (TRIUMPH), we constructed a logistic regression model using 27 patient demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical factors, adjusting for site, to identify predictors of chronic stress over 1 year. Stress at baseline and at 1-, 6- and 12-month follow-up was measured using the 4-item Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-4) [range 0-16, scores ≥6 depicting high stress]. Chronic stress was defined as at least 2 follow-up PSS-4 scores ≥6. We identified and validated this final model in another prospective registry of patients with symptomatic PAD, the PORTRAIT study., Results: Our derivation cohort consisted of 4,340 patients with MI (mean age 59.1 ± 12.3 years, 33% females, 30% non-white), of whom 30% had chronic stress at follow-up. Of the 27 factors examined, female sex, current smoking, socioeconomic status, and economic burden due to medical care were positively associated with chronic stress, and ENRICHD Social Support Instrument (ESSI) score and age were inversely related to chronic stress. In the validation cohort of 797 PAD patients (mean age 68.6±9.7 years, 42% females, 28% non-white, 18% chronic stress) the c-statistic for the model was 0.77 and calibration was excellent., Conclusions: We can reliably identify factors that are independently associated with risk of chronic stress in patients with CVD. As chronic stress is associated with worse outcomes in this population, our work identifies potential targets for interventions to as well as the patients that could benefit from these., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Background: Long-term exposure to particulate matter <2.5 µm in diameter (PM 2.5 ) and ozone has been associated with the development and progression of cardiovascular disease and, in the case of PM 2.5 , higher cardiovascular mortality. Whether exposure to PM 2.5 and ozone is associated with patients' health status and quality of life is unknown. We used data from 2 prospective myocardial infarction (MI) registries to assess the relationship between long-term PM 2.5 and ozone exposure with health status outcomes 1 year after an MI., Methods and Results: TRIUMPH (Translational Research Investigating Underlying Disparities in Acute Myocardial Infarction) and PREMIER (Prospective Registry Evaluating Myocardial Infarction: Events and Recovery) enrolled patients presenting with MI at 31 US hospitals between 2003 and 2008. One year later, patients were assessed with the disease-specific Seattle Angina Questionnaire, and 5-year mortality was assessed with the Centers for Disease Control's National Death Index. Individual patients' exposures to PM 2.5 and ozone over the year after their MI were estimated from the Environment Protection Agency's Fused Air Quality Surface Using Downscaling tool that integrates monitoring station data and atmospheric models to predict daily air pollution exposure at the census tract level. We assessed the association of exposure to ozone and PM 2.5 with 1-year health status and mortality over 5 years using regression models adjusting for age, sex, race, socioeconomic status, date of enrollment, and comorbidities. In completely adjusted models, higher PM 2.5 and ozone exposure were independently associated with poorer Seattle Angina Questionnaire summary scores at 1-year (β estimate per +1 SD increase =-0.8 [95% CI, -1.4 to -0.3; P=0.002] for PM 2.5 and -0.9 [95% CI, -1.3 to -0.4; P<0.001] for ozone). Moreover, higher PM 2.5 exposure, but not ozone, was independently associated with greater mortality risk (hazard ratio =1.13 per +1 SD [95% CI, 1.07-1.20; P<0.001])., Conclusions: In our study, greater exposure to PM 2.5 and ozone was associated with poorer 1-year health status following an MI, and PM 2.5 was associated with increased risk of 5-year death.

Background While beta-blockers have been widely used for patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD), some concerns have been raised that beta blockers do not have survival benefit in this population. We conducted a meta-analysis to determine the effects of beta blockers on all-cause and cardiac mortality in adults with CAD without previous myocardial infarction (MI) or reduced ejection fraction. Methods A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, Medline/Ovid and Google Scholar through March 2016 identified 4 studies that reported angiographic CAD without previous myocardial infarction or reduced ejection fraction. Fixed-effects pooled odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals of all-cause and cardiac mortality were estimated. We used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system to assess overall quality of evidence. Results A total of 17,397 patients were analyzed. In both all-cause and cardiac mortality analysis, no serious limitation was identified. Beta-blockers were not associated with reductions in all-cause mortality (odds ratios = 0.910, 95% confidence intervals 0.797–1.039, p = .163) or cardiac mortality (odds ratio = 0.926, 95% confidence interval 0.773–1.110, p = .407). Conclusion Beta-blockers do not provide any survival benefit in patients with angiographic CAD without history of MI or reduced ejection fraction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]