Search

Background: Cardiogenic shock (CS) complicates 5%-10% of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and is the leading cause of early mortality. It remains unclear whether percutaneous mechanical support (pMCS) devices improve post-AMI CS outcome., Methods: A systematic review of original studies comparing the effect of pMCS on AMI-CS mortality was conducted with the use of Medline, Embase, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library databases., Results: Of 8672 records, 50 were retained for quantitative analysis. Four additional references were added from other sources. Four references reported a significant mortality reduction with intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) in patients with failed primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) or managed with thrombolysis. Meta-analyses showed no advantage of Impella over conventional therapy (pooled OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.20-1.46; I 2  = 0.85) and increased mortality compared with IABP (pooled OR 1.32; 95% CI 1.08-1.62; I 2  = 0.85). No study reported a mortality advantage for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) over conventional therapy, IABP, or Impella support. Early mortality might be improved with the addition of IABP or Impella to ECMO. Bleeding Academic Research Consortium ≥ 3 bleeding was increased with every pMCS strategy., Conclusions: The current evidence is of poor to moderate quality, with only 1 in 5 included articles reporting randomised data and several reporting unadjusted outcomes. Yet, there is some evidence to favour IABP use in the setting of thrombolysis or with failed pPCI, and adding IABP or Impella should be considered for patients requiring ECMO., (Copyright © 2022 Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Importance: Persistently depressed left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) after myocardial infarction (MI) is associated with adverse prognosis and directs the use of evidence-based treatments to prevent sudden cardiac death and/or progressive heart failure., Objective: To assess adherence with guideline-recommended LVEF reassessment and to study the evolution of LVEF over 6 months of follow-up., Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a multicenter cohort study at Canadian academic and community hospitals with on-site cardiac catheterization services. Patients with type 1 acute MI and LVEF less than or equal to 45% during the index hospitalization were enrolled between January 2018 and August 2019 and were followed-up for 6 months. Data analysis was performed from May 2020 to September 2021., Exposures: Baseline clinical factors, in-hospital care and LVEF, and site-specific features., Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes were receipt of repeat LVEF assessment by 6 months and the presence of a persistent LVEF reduction at 2 thresholds: LVEF less than or equal to 40%, prompting consideration of additional medical therapy for heart failure, or LVEF less than or equal to 35%, prompting referral for implanted cardioverter defibrillator in addition to medical therapy., Results: This study included 501 patients (mean [SD] age, 63.3 [13.0] years; 113 women [22.6%]). Overall, 370 patients (73.4%) presented with STEMI, and 454 (90.6%) had in-hospital revascularization. The median (IQR) baseline LVEF was 40% (34%-43%). Of 458 patients (91.4%) who completed the 6-month follow-up, 303 (66.2%; 95% CI, 61.7%-70.5%) had LVEF reassessment, with a range of 46.7% to 90.0% across sites (χ213 = 19.6; P = .11). Participants from community hospitals were more likely than those from academic hospitals to undergo LVEF reassessment (73.6% vs 63.2%; χ21 = 4.50; P = .03), as were those with worse LVEF at baseline. Follow-up LVEF improved by an absolute median (IQR) of 8% (3%-15%). However, 103 patients (34.1%) met the definitions of clinically relevant LVEF reduction, including 52 patients (17.2%) with LVEF less than or equal to 35% and 51 patients (16.9%) with LVEF of 35.1% to 40.0%., Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, approximately 1 in 3 patients with at least mild LVEF reduction after acute MI did not undergo indicated LVEF reassessment within 6 months, suggesting that programs to improve the quality of post-MI care should include measures to ensure that indicated repeat cardiac imaging is performed. In those with follow-up imaging, clinically relevant persistent LVEF reduction was identified in more than one-third of patients.

Untargeted metabolomics is used to refine the development of biomarkers for the diagnosis of cardiovascular disease. Myocardial infarction (MI) has major individual and societal consequences for patients, who remain at high risk of secondary events, despite advances in pharmacological therapy. To monitor their differential response to treatment, we performed untargeted plasma metabolomics on 175 patients from the platelet inhibition and patient outcomes (PLATO) trial treated with ticagrelor and clopidogrel, two common P 2 Y 12 inhibitors. We identified a signature that discriminates patients, which involves polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) and particularly the omega-3 fatty acids docosahexaenoate and eicosapentaenoate. The known cardiovascular benefits of PUFAs could contribute to the efficacy of ticagrelor. Our work, beyond pointing out the high relevance of untargeted metabolomics in evaluating response to treatment, establishes PUFA metabolism as a pathway of clinical interest in the recovery path from MI., Competing Interests: J.G.H. has received speaker honoraria from Dalcor and District 3 Innovation Centre. R.C.B. has received grants from AstraZeneca during the conduct of the study and has received personal fees from Ionis, Akcea, and Novartis outside the submitted work. M.Y.C. has received research support and consultation honoraria from AstraZeneca. E.M.J. is supported by research grants from Les Fonds la Recherche du Québec en Santé (FRQS) and the Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR). R.D.L. has received grants from AstraZeneca during the conduct of the study; has consulted for Bayer, Boehringer Ingleheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Merck, and Portola; and has received grants and consulted for Sanofi, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Glaxo Smith Kline, Medtronic, and Pfizer outside the submitted work. T.Y.W. has received grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Cryolife and has received grants from Chiesi, Merck, Portola, Regeneron, Boston Scientific, and Abbott outside the submitted work. L.K.N. has received grants from AstraZeneca during the conduct of the study and grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, Amylin, and GlaxoSmithKline and has received personal fees from GlaxoSmithKline outside the submitted work. M.L. has received speaker honoraria from Bayer, has participated in industry-funded trials from Idorsia, and has received in-kind and financial support for investigator-initiated grants from Leo Pharma, Roche Diagnostics, and Aggredyne. The remaining authors disclose no competing interests., (© 2021 The Authors.)

Objectives: This study aimed at comparing direct stenting (DS) versus stenting with pre-dilation (SP) in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), using a systematic review and meta-analysis of published evidence., Background: There is conflicting evidence whether stenting strategy impacts clinical outcomes in patients with STEMI., Methods: We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, and CENTRAL, from inception to December 2014. The primary endpoint was mortality. Secondary endpoints included major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), ST-segment resolution, and angiographic outcomes., Results: A total of 9,331 patients enrolled in 12 studies (3 randomized controlled trials, RCTs; 9 non-randomized studies, NRSs) were included. DS was associated with lower mortality (OR 0.55; 95%CI: 0.33-0.94; P = 0.03) in NRSs, and overall (OR 0.56; 95%CI: 0.37-0.86; P = 0.008). Mortality was non-significantly reduced in RCTs (OR 0.56; 95%CI: 0.26-1.23; P = 0.15). DS was also associated with lower MACE rate (OR 0.71; 95%CI 0.60-0.84; P < 0.0001) in NRSs, but not in RCTs (OR 0.99; 95%CI: 0.61-1.60; P = 0.96). ST-segment resolution, no reflow, final thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow and final TIMI myocardial perfusion or blush grade were significantly better with DS in NRSs, and non-significantly better in RCTs., Conclusions: The available evidence suggests that DS in STEMI might be associated with better clinical and procedural outcomes, as compared with SP. However, the fact that RCTs account for the minority of available data and that most of the available studies poorly reflect current clinical practice, as well as the existence of publication bias, preclude drawing definitive conclusions., (© 2015, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Aims: To conduct a meta-analysis of studies comparing immediate versus delayed stenting in populations where primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or early invasive revascularisation was the initial mode of reperfusion., Methods and Results: We identified five non-randomised studies and one randomised trial for a total of 590 patients in studies comparing immediate to delayed stenting in populations where primary PCI or early invasive revascularisation was the initial mode of reperfusion. In non-randomised studies, delayed stenting was associated with a reduction of procedure-related angiographic events (OR=0.13, 95% credible interval [CrI]: 0.03- 0.36). No differences were observed in the rates of major bleeding (OR=0.81, 95% CrI: 0.01-13.42) and major adverse cardiac events (OR=0.40, 95% CrI: 0.09-1.91), between delayed and immediate stenting. In one randomised trial, delayed stenting was associated with a reduction in myocardial infarction during hospitalisation (39% vs. 60%; relative risk [RR]=0.55, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.39-0.80). None of the patients assigned to delayed stenting experienced a major adverse cardiac event in the interval between the initial angiogram and the stenting., Conclusions: Delayed stent implantation is associated with better angiographic outcomes. Randomised trials are required to assess whether delayed stenting translates into better long-term cardiac outcomes.

Aims: Red blood cell transfusion is associated with increased mortality among patients with acute coronary syndromes, but little is known about the consequences of transfusion in a contemporary setting of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. We describe the association between transfusion and 90-day mortality among patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention., Methods and Results: Analyses were performed on 5532 patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction from the Assessment of Pexelizumab in Acute Myocardial Infarction trial. The primary objective of this analysis was to ascertain the relation between red blood cell transfusion and 90-day mortality in patients with recent myocardial infarction. We initially determined the baseline and in-hospital predictors of transfusion (multivariable logistic regressions) and subsequently assessed the association between transfusion and mortality using a series of Cox proportional hazards regression combined to a landmark analyses. A total of 213 patients (3.9%) received a transfusion. Transfusion remained significantly associated with mortality [hazards ratio = 2.16 (1.20-3.88)], despite adjustment for baseline characteristics, in-hospital co-interventions, and for propensity of receiving a transfusion. Among patients who survived to hospital discharge, however, the hazard of death was not different in patients treated with transfusion., Conclusion: Transfusion is associated with 90-day mortality in acute myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Although transfusion may be causally related to mortality, it is likely that at least part of the association is due to confounding. This association illustrates the complex relationship between transfusion, bleeding, and mortality and underscores the need for further research to understand the relationship between transfusion and clinical outcomes.

Aims: Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) possess intrinsic features that identify them as useful for treating ischaemic syndromes. Poor in vivo survival/engraftment of MSCs, however, limits their overall effectiveness. In this work, we tested whether genetically engineering MSCs to secrete erythropoietin (Epo) could represent a better therapeutic platform than MSCs in their native form., Methods and Results: MSCs from C57Bl/6 mice were retrovirally transduced with either an empty vector or one that causes the production of Epo and were then analysed for the alterations in angiogenic and survival potential. Using a mouse model of myocardial infarction (MI), the regenerative potential of null MSCs and Epo-overexpressing MSCs (Epo+MSCs) was assessed using serial echocardiogram and invasive haemodynamic measurements. Infarct size, capillary density and neutrophil influx were assessed using histologic techniques. Using in vitro assays coupled with an in vivo Matrigel plug assay, we demonstrate that engineering MSCs to express Epo does not alter their immunophenotype or plasticity. However, relative to mock-modified MSCs [wild-type (WT)-MSCs], Epo+MSCs are more resilient to apoptotic stimuli and initiate a more robust host-derived angiogenic response. We also identify and characterize the autocrine loop established on MSCs by having them secrete Epo. Furthermore, in a murine model of MI, animals receiving intracardiac injections of Epo+MSCs exhibited significantly enhanced cardiac function compared with WT-MSCs and saline-injected control animals post-MI, owing to the increased myocardial capillary density and the reduced neutrophilia., Conclusion: Epo overexpression enhances the cellular regenerative properties of MSCs by both autocrine and paracrine pathways.

Accomplishing a successful percutaneous coronary intervention in a patient with a suspected or diagnosed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) requires the selection of an appropriate alternative anticoagulant and a thorough assessment of bleeding and thrombotic risks. In this review, we suggest an evidence-based management algorithm that takes into account the clinical phase of HIT (acute, recent, and remote HIT) and the associated risk when patients present with acute coronary syndrome. The algorithm also integrates preventive measures directed at decreasing the bleeding risk associated with the antithrombotic and invasive therapies used for HIT and percutaneous coronary intervention.