Search

Aims: The present analysis from the Functional Assessment in Elderly Myocardial Infarction Patients with Multivessel Disease (FIRE) trial aims to explore the significance of pre-admission physical activity and assess whether the benefits of physiology-guided complete revascularization apply consistently to sedentary and active older patients., Methods and Results: Patients aged 75 years or more with myocardial infarction (MI) and multivessel disease were randomized to receive physiology-guided complete revascularization or culprit-only strategy. The primary outcome was a composite of death, MI, stroke, or any revascularization within a year. Secondary endpoints included the composite of cardiovascular death or MI, as well as single components of the primary endpoint. Pre-admission physical activity was categorized into three groups: (i) absent (sedentary), (ii) light, and (iii) vigorous. Among 1445 patients, 692 (48%) were sedentary, whereas 560 (39%) and 193 (13%) performed light and vigorous physical activity, respectively. Patients engaging in light or vigorous pre-admission physical activity exhibited a reduced risk of the primary outcome compared with sedentary individuals [light hazard ratio (HR) 0.70, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.55-0.91 and vigorous HR 0.14, 95% CI 0.07-0.91, respectively]. These trends were also observed for death, cardiovascular death, or MI. When comparing physiology-guided complete revascularization vs. culprit-only strategy, no significant interaction was observed for primary and secondary endpoints when stratified by sedentary or active status., Conclusion: In older patients with MI, pre-admission physical activity emerges as a robust and independent prognostic determinant. Physiology-guided complete revascularization stands out an effective strategy in reducing ischaemic adverse events, irrespective of pre-admission physical activity status., Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03772743., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: G.Cam. received research grants and personal fees from ABBOTT VASCULAR, personal fees from MENARINI, personal fees from AMGEN, personal fees from SANOFI, outside the submitted work. S.B. received personal fees from ABBOTT VASCULAR, outside the submitted work., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Importance: Patients with high bleeding risk (HBR) have a poor prognosis, and it is not known if they may benefit from complete revascularization after myocardial infarction (MI)., Objective: To investigate the benefit of physiology-guided complete revascularization vs a culprit-only strategy in patients with HBR, MI, and multivessel disease., Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a prespecified analysis of the Functional Assessment in Elderly MI Patients With Multivessel Disease (FIRE) randomized clinical trial data. FIRE was an investigator-initiated, open-label, multicenter trial. Patients 75 years or older with MI and multivessel disease were enrolled at 34 European centers from July 2019 through October 2021. Physiology treatment was performed either by angiography- or wire-based assessment. Patients were divided into HBR or non-HBR categories in accordance with the Academic Research Consortium HBR document., Interventions: Patients were randomized to either physiology-guided complete revascularization or culprit-only strategy., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome comprised a composite of death, MI, stroke, or revascularization at 1 year. Secondary outcomes included a composite of cardiovascular death or MI and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) types 3 to 5., Results: Among 1445 patients (mean [SD] age, 81 [5] years; 917 male [63%]), 1025 (71%) met HBR criteria. Patients with HBR were at higher risk for the primary end point (hazard ratio [HR], 2.01; 95% CI, 1.47-2.76), cardiovascular death or MI (HR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.26-2.83), and BARC types 3 to 5 (HR, 3.28; 95% CI, 1.40-7.64). The primary end point was significantly reduced with physiology-guided complete revascularization as compared with culprit-only strategy in patients with HBR (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.55-0.96). No indication of interaction was noted between revascularization strategy and HBR status for primary and secondary end points., Conclusions and Relevance: HBR status is prevalent among older patients with MI, significantly increasing the likelihood of adverse events. Physiology-guided complete revascularization emerges as an effective strategy, in comparison with culprit-only revascularization, for mitigating ischemic adverse events, including cardiovascular death and MI., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03772743.

Introduction: The potential benefit on long term outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) on Unprotected Left Main (ULM) driven by IntraVascular UltraSound (IVUS) remains to be defined., Methods: IMPACTUS LM-PCI is an observational, multicenter study that enrolled consecutive patients with ULM disease undergoing coronary angioplasty in 13 European high-volume centers from January 2002 to December 2015. Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACEs) a composite of cardiovascular (CV) death, target vessel revascularization (TVR) and myocardial infarction (MI) were the primary endpoints, while its single components along with all cause death the secondary ones., Results: 627 patients with ULM disease were enrolled, 213 patients (34%) underwent IVUS-guided PCI while 414 (66%) angioguided PCI. Patients in the two cohorts had similar prevalence of risk factors except for active smoking and clinical presentation. During a median follow-up of 7.5 years, 47 (22%) patients in the IVUS group and 211 (51%) in the angio-guided group underwent the primary endpoint (HR 0.42; 95% CI [0.31-0.58] p < 0.001). After multivariate adjustment, IVUS was significantly associated with a reduced incidence of the primary endpoint (adj HR 0.39; 95% CI [0.23-0.64], p < 0.001), mainly driven by a reduction of TVR (ad HR 0.30, 95% CI [0.15-0.62], p = 0.001) and of all-cause death (adj HR 0.47, 95% CI [0.28-0.82], p = 0.008). IVUS use, age, diabetes, side branch stenosis, DES and creatinine at admission were independent predictors of MACE., Conclusions: In patients undergoing ULM PCI, the use of IVUS was associated with a reduced risk at long-term follow-up of MACE, all-cause death and subsequent revascularization., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Iatrogenic coronary artery dissections (ICAD) are rare but potentially devastating complications during coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Intima media complex separation may be produced either by the catheter tip or during PCI. Patient characteristics and procedure related risk factors are intimately linked to catheter induced ICAD over diagnostic angiography. Moreover, the increasing complexity of patients undergoing PCI, which frequently involves treatment of heavily calcified or occluded vessels, has increased the likelihood of dissections during PCI. A prompt recognition, along with a prompt management (either percutaneous, surgical or even careful watching), are key in preventing catastrophic consequences of ICAD, such as left ventricular dysfunction, cardiogenic shock, periprocedural myocardial infarction (MI) or cardiac death. This review aims to summarize the main updates concerning the pathophysiology, highlight key risk factors and suggest recommendations in management and treatment of ICAD.

Repeat coronary revascularization is a common adverse event after successful percutaneous coronary intervention. This analysis aimed to assess the effects of ticagrelor monotherapy on repeat clinically driven revascularization (CDR). In the TWILIGHT (Ticagrelor With Aspirin or Alone in High-Risk Patients after Coronary Intervention) trial, after 3 months of ticagrelor plus aspirin, high-risk patients were maintained on ticagrelor and randomly allocated to aspirin or placebo for 1 year. The primary end point of this analysis was CDR within 12 months after randomization. The key secondary end points were major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or CDR, and net adverse clinical events (NACEs), including the individual components of MACCEs and clinically relevant bleeding. The analysis was performed in the per-protocol population. CDR occurred in 473 of 7,039 patients and was associated with a significantly higher risk of subsequent all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (adjusted hazard ratios [HRs] 2.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.82 to 4.67). Ticagrelor monotherapy was associated with a similar 12-month risk of CDR (7.1% vs 6.6%; HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.30, p = 0.363) and MACCEs (8.9% vs 8.6%; HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.22, p = 0.619), and a lower risk of NACEs (12.2% vs 14.6%; HR 0.83 95% CI 0.73 to 0.94, p = 0.004) than ticagrelor plus aspirin. In conclusion, among high-risk patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention, ticagrelor monotherapy after 3 months of ticagrelor-based dual antiplatelet therapy was associated with a similar risk of CDR and MACCEs and a decrease of NACEs (TWILIGHT: NCT02270242)., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Dr. Spirito received a research grant from the Swiss National Science Foundation (Bern, Switzerland). Dr. Mehta has received grant support from and has served on an executive committee and as site investigator for AstraZeneca (Cambridge, United Kingdom). Dr. Mehran reports institutional research payments from Abbott, Abiomed, Alleviant Medical, Amgen, AM-Pharmacia, Arena, AstraZeneca, Atricure, Bayer, Biosensors, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Bristol-Myers Squibb, CardiaWave, CeloNova, Chiesi, Concept Medical, CSL Behring, Cytosorbents, Daiichi-Sankyo, Element Science, Faraday, Humacyte, Idorsia Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Medtronic, Novartis, OrbusNeich, PhaseBio, Philips, Pi-Cardia, PLx Pharma, RenalPro, RM Global, Shockwave, Vivasure, Zoll; personal fees from Cine-Med Research, Novartis, WebMD; Equity <1% in Applied Therapeutics, Elixir Medical, Stel, ControlRad (spouse); Scientific Advisory Board for AMA, ACC (BOT Member), SCAI (Women in Innovations Committee Member), JAMA Associate Editor; Faculty CRF (no fee). Dr. Kastrati is an inventor in a patent application related to drug-eluting stent technology; he also serves in the Data and Safety Monitoring Board of the TARGET IV trial sponsored by the Cardiovascular Research Foundation in New York. Dr. Angiolillo declares that he has received consulting fees or honoraria from Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biosensors, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chiesi, CSL Behring, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly (Gilead), Haemonetics, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, PhaseBio, PLx Pharma, Pfizer (New York, New York), Sanofi and Vectura; D.J.A. also declares that his institution has received research grants from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biosensors, CeloNova, CSL Behring, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Idorsia, Janssen, Matsutani Chemical Industry Co., Merck, Novartis, and the Scott R. MacKenzie Foundation. Dr. Baber has received honoraria from AstraZeneca and Boston Scientific. Dr. Cohen has received grant support, paid to his institution, and consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Medtronic, and Abbott Vascular; and has received grant support, paid to his institution, from Boston Scientific Dr. Dangas has received consulting fees and advisory board fees from AstraZeneca; has received consulting fees from Biosensors; and previously held stock in Medtronic. Dr. Escaned has received consulting and lecture fees from Abbott, Philips, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic; and has received lecture fees from Abiomed, Terumo, and Biosensors. Dr. Gibson has received grant support and consulting fees from Angel Medical, Bayer, CSL Behring, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Johnson & Johnson, and Portola Pharmaceuticals; has received consulting fees from The Medicines Company, Eli Lilly Sciences, Novo Nordisk, WebMD, UpToDate Cardiovascular Medicine, Amarin Pharma, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Merck, PharmaMar, Sanofi, Somahlution, Verreseon, Boston Scientific, Impact Bio, MedImmume, Medtelligence, MicroPort, the PERT Consortium, and GE Healthcare (Little Chalfont, United Kingdom); holds equity in Inference; serves as chief executive officer of the Baim Institute; and has received grant support, paid to the Baim Institute, from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Astra Zeneca. Dr. Huber has received lecture fees from AstraZeneca and Bayer. The remining authors have no competing interests to declare., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The association of coronary stent malapposition (SM) and adverse clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains unclear. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and observational studies to assess the association between acute and persistent SM detected using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) or optical coherence tomography (OCT) and adverse cardiovascular outcomes., Evidence Acquisition: Available studies were identified through a systematic search of PubMed, reference lists of relevant articles, and Medline. Main efficacy outcomes of interest were: device-oriented composite endpoint (DoCE, including cardiac death, myocardial infarction [MI], target lesion revascularization [TLR], and stent thrombosis [ST]), major safety events (MSE, including cardiac death, MI and ST), TLR, and ST. A sensitivity analysis regarding the impact of major malapposition was also performed., Evidence Synthesis: A total of 9 studies enrolling 6497 patients were included in the meta-analysis. After a mean follow-up of 24±14 months, overall acute and/or persistent malapposition was not significantly associated with the occurrence of all the outcomes of interest, including DoCE (risk ratio [RR] 1.00, 95% confidence interval [CI, 0.79-1.26], P=0.99), MSE (RR 1.42, 95%CI [0.81-2.50], P=0.22), TLR (RR 0.84, 95%CI [0.59-1.19], P=0.33), and ST (RR 1.16, 95%CI [0.48-2.85], P=0.74). In the sensitivity analysis, we found a significant increase of MSE in patients with major malapposition (RR 2.97, 95%CI [1.51-5.87], P=0.001)., Conclusions: Acute and persistent SM were not overall associated with adverse cardiovascular clinical outcomes at follow-up. However, major malapposition was associated with an increased risk of major safety events, including cardiac death, MI and ST. These findings should be taken into account during stent implantation and PCI optimization.

Background: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total coronary occlusions (CTO) improves clinical symptoms and quality of life. The longer-term safety of PCI compared to optimal medical therapy (OMT) remains uncertain., Aims: We sought to evaluate the long-term safety of PCI for CTO in a randomised trial as compared to OMT., Methods: A total of 396 patients with a symptomatic CTO were enrolled into a randomised, multicentre clinical trial comparing PCI and OMT. Half of the patients had a single CTO; the others had multivessel disease. Non-CTO lesions were treated prior to randomisation (2:1 ratio). During follow-up, crossover from OMT to PCI occurred in 7.3% (1 year) and 17.5% (3 years) of patients., Results: At 3 years, the incidence of cardiovascular death or nonfatal myocardial infarction was not significantly different between the groups (OMT 3.7% vs PCI 6.2%; p=0.29). By per-protocol analysis, the difference remained non-significant (OMT 5.7% vs PCI 4.7%; p=0.67). Overall, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were more frequent with OMT (OMT 21.2% vs PCI 11.2%), largely because of ischaemia-driven revascularisation. The rates of stroke or hospitalisation for bleeding were not different between the groups., Conclusions: At 3 years there was no difference in the rate of cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction between PCI or OMT among patients with a remaining single coronary CTO. The MACE rate was higher in the OMT group due largely to ischaemia-driven revascularisation. CTO PCI appears to be a safe option for patients with a single remaining significant coronary CTO. CinicalTrials.gov: NCT01760083.

Background: The benefit of complete revascularization in older patients (≥75 years of age) with myocardial infarction and multivessel disease remains unclear., Methods: In this multicenter, randomized trial, we assigned older patients with myocardial infarction and multivessel disease who were undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the culprit lesion to receive either physiology-guided complete revascularization of nonculprit lesions or to receive no further revascularization. Functionally significant nonculprit lesions were identified either by pressure wire or angiography. The primary outcome was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or any revascularization at 1 year. The key secondary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction. Safety was assessed as a composite of contrast-associated acute kidney injury, stroke, or bleeding., Results: A total of 1445 patients underwent randomization (720 to receive complete revascularization and 725 to receive culprit-only revascularization). The median age of the patients was 80 years (interquartile range, 77 to 84); 528 patients (36.5%) were women, and 509 (35.2%) were admitted for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. A primary-outcome event occurred in 113 patients (15.7%) in the complete-revascularization group and in 152 patients (21.0%) in the culprit-only group (hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57 to 0.93; P = 0.01). Cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction occurred in 64 patients (8.9%) in the complete-revascularization group and in 98 patients (13.5%) in the culprit-only group (hazard ratio, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.88). The safety outcome did not appear to differ between the groups (22.5% vs. 20.4%; P = 0.37)., Conclusions: Among patients who were 75 years of age or older with myocardial infarction and multivessel disease, those who underwent physiology-guided complete revascularization had a lower risk of a composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or ischemia-driven revascularization at 1 year than those who received culprit-lesion-only PCI. (Funded by Consorzio Futuro in Ricerca and others; FIRE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03772743.)., (Copyright © 2023 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Debulking lesions with severe coronary artery calcification (CAC) is highly recommended to obtain good procedural and long-term success. Utilization and performance of coronary intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) after rotational atherectomy (RA) has not been thoroughly studied. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of IVL with the Shockwave Coronary Rx Lithotripsy System in lesions with severe CAC as elective or bail-out strategy after RA. This observational, prospective, single-arm, multicenter, international, open-label Rota-Shock registry included patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease and lesions with severe CAC treated by percutaneous coronary intervention, including lesion preparation with RA and IVL, at 23 high-volume centers. Primary efficacy end point was procedural success, defined as final diameter stenosis <30% by quantitative coronary angiography. Primary safety end point was freedom from serious angiographic complications, which included >National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute type B dissection, perforation, abrupt closure, slow or no flow, final thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow <3, and acute thrombosis. A total of 160 patients were enrolled between June 2020 and June 2022. The primary efficacy end point was observed in 155 patients (96.9%). The primary safety end point occurred in 145 cases (90.6%). Dissections >National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute type B occurred in 3 patients (1.9%), whereas slow or no flow occurred in 8 (5.0%), final thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow <3 in 3 (1.9%), and perforation in 4 patients (2.5%). Free from inhospital major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, including cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, cerebrovascular accident, definite/probable stent thrombosis, and major bleeding, occurred in 158 patients (98.7%). In conclusion, IVL after RA in lesions with severe CAC was effective and safe, with a very low incidence of complications as either elective or bail-out strategy., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Dr. Stefanini discloses speaker fees from Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, and Pfizer/Bristol-Myers Squibb. Dr. Van Mieghem discloses research grant support by Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, PulseCath BV, Daiichi Sankyo, and Pie Medical and consultancy fees from Siemens, Amgen, Daiichi Sankyo, Abbott Vascular, Biotronik, Medtronic, and Abiomed. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interests to declare., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

There have been no studies comparing clinical outcomes of physiology-guided revascularization in patients with unprotected left main coronary disease (ULMD) between percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs. coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The aim of this study was to assess the long-term clinical outcomes between PCI and CABG of patients with physiologically significant ULMD. From an international multicenter registry of ULMD patients interrogated with instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR), we analyzed data from 151 patients (85 PCI vs. 66 CABG) who underwent revascularization according to the cutoff value of iFR ≤ 0.89. Propensity score matching was employed to adjust for baseline clinical characteristics. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization. The secondary endpoints were the individual components of the primary endpoint. Mean age was 66.6 (± 9.2) years, 79.2% male. Mean SYNTAX score was 22.6 (± 8.4) and median iFR was 0.83 (IQR 0.74-0.87). After performing propensity score matching analysis, 48 patients treated with CABG were matched to those who underwent PCI. At a median follow-up period of 2.8 years, the primary endpoint occurred in 8.3% in PCI group and 20.8% in CABG group, respectively (HR 3.80; 95% CI 1.04-13.9; p = 0.043). There was no difference in each component of the primary event (p > 0.05 for all). Within the present study, iFR-guided PCI was associated with lower cardiovascular events rate in patients with ULMD and intermediate SYNTAX score, as compared to CABG. State-of-the-art PCI vs. CABG for ULMD. Study design and primary endpoint in patients with physiologically significant ULMD. MACE was defined as the composite of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization. The blue line denotes the PCI arm, and the red line denotes the CABG arm. PCI was associated with significantly lower risk of MACE than CABG. CABG: coronary artery bypass grafting; iFR: instantaneous wave-free ratio; MACE: major adverse cardiovascular events; PCI: percutaneous coronary intervention; ULMD: unprotected left main coronary artery disease., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: The majority of randomized controlled trials of revascularization decision-making excludes left main coronary artery disease (LMD). Therefore, contemporary clinical outcomes of patients with stable coronary artery disease and LMD with proven ischemia remain poorly understood. The aim of this study was to assess the long-term clinical outcomes of physiologically significant LMD according to the treatment strategies of revascularization versus revascularization deferral., Methods: In this international multicenter registry of stable LMD interrogated with the instantaneous wave-free ratio, patients with physiologically significant ischemia (instantaneous wave-free ratio ≤0.89) were analyzed according to the coronary revascularization (n=151) versus revascularization deferral (n=74). Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for baseline clinical characteristics. The primary end point was a composite of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization of left main stem. The secondary end points were as follows: cardiac death or spontaneous LMD-related myocardial infarction; and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization of left main stem., Results: At a median follow-up period of 2.8 years, the primary end point occurred in 11 patients (14.9%) in the revascularized group and 21 patients (28.4%) in the deferred group (hazard ratio, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.20-0.89]; P =0.023). For the secondary end points, cardiac death or LMD-related myocardial infarction occurred significantly less frequently in the revascularized group (0.0% versus 8.1%; P =0.004). The rate of ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization of left main stem was also significantly lower in the revascularized group (5.4% versus 17.6%; hazard ratio, 0.20 [95% CI, 0.056-0.70]; P =0.012)., Conclusions: In patients who underwent revascularization for stable coronary artery disease and physiologically significant LMD determined by instantaneous wave-free ratio, the long-term clinical outcomes were significantly improved as compared with those in whom revascularization was deferred., Competing Interests: Disclosures Dr Warisawa has received consulting fees from Abbott Medical Japan and Philips Japan. Dr Cook has received speaker’s honoraria from Philips Volcano and Boston Scientific. Dr Seligman has received a research grant from Amgen. Dr Howard is supported by the Wellcome Trust (212183/Z/18/Z). Dr Kikuta reports speaker fees from Abbott Vascular and Philips. Dr Sen is supported by the Academy of Medical Sciences and Imperial Biomedical Research Center. Dr Sen (G1000357) is supported by the Medical Research Council, and has served on the Speakers Bureau, and participated in educational events for Pfizer, Phillips, Daichi-Sankyo, and AstraZeneca. Dr Sen has received speaker fees from Volcano, Pfizer, and Medtronic. Dr Al-Lamee has received a speaker honorarium from Philips Volcano. Dr Matsuo receive consultant fees from Zeon Medical, and speaker fees from Abbott Vascular Japan, Philips Japan, and Boston Scientific Japan. Dr Davies holds patents pertaining to the iFR technology. Dr Davies is a consultant for Philips Volcano, and has received research grants from Philips Volcano. The other authors report no conflicts.

Background: The optimal management of patients with spontaneous coronary artery dissection remains debated., Methods: Patients enrolled in the DISCO (Dissezioni Spontanee Coronariche) Registry up to December 2020 were included. The primary end point was major adverse cardiovascular events, a composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and repeat percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Independent predictors of PCI and medical management were investigated., Results: Among 369 patients, 129 (35%) underwent PCI, whereas 240 (65%) were medically managed. ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (68% versus 35%, P <0.001), resuscitated cardiac arrest (9% versus 3%, P <0.001), proximal coronary segment involvement (32% versus 7%, P <0.001), and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction flow 0 to 1 (54% versus 20%, P <0.001) were more frequent in the PCI arm. In-hospital event rates were similar. Between patients treated with PCI and medical therapy, there were no differences in terms of major adverse cardiovascular events at 2 years (13.9% versus 11.7%, P =0.467), all-cause death (0.7% versus 0.4%, P =0.652), myocardial infarction (9.3% versus 8.3%, P =0.921) and repeat PCI (12.4% versus 8.7%, P =0.229). ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction at presentation (odds ratio [OR], 3.30 [95% CI, 1.56-7.12]; P =0.002), proximal coronary segment involvement (OR, 5.43 [95% CI, 1.98-16.45]; P =0.002), Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction flow grade 0 to 1 and 2 (respectively, OR, 3.22 [95% CI, 1.08-9.96]; P =0.038; and OR, 3.98 [95% CI, 1.38-11.80]; P =0.009) and luminal narrowing (OR per 5% increase, 1.13 [95% CI, 1.01-1.28]; P =0.037) were predictors of PCI, whereas the 2B-angiographic subtype predicted medical management (OR, 0.25 [95% CI, 0.07-0.83]; P =0.026)., Conclusions: Clinical presentation and procedural variables drive the choice of the initial therapeutic approach in spontaneous coronary artery dissection. If PCI is needed, it seems to be associated with a similar risk of short-to-mid-term adverse events compared to medical treatment., Registration: URL: https://www., Clinicaltrials: gov; Unique identifier: NCT04415762., Competing Interests: Disclosures Dr Porto reports consultant or speaker fees from Biotronik, ABIOMED, Terumo, Philips, Sanofi, Amgen, Daiichi-Sankyo, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, and PIAM, not related to this work. The other authors report no conflicts.

Background: There is an ongoing debate on the extension of reperfusion-related microvascular damage (MVD) throughout the remote noninfarcted myocardial regions in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) that undergo primary percutaneous intervention (pPCI). The aim of this study was to elucidate the impact of reperfusion on remote microcirculatory territory by analyzing hemodynamic alterations in the nonculprit-vessel in relation to reperfusion., Methods: A total of 20 patients with STEMI undergoing pPCI were included. Peri-reperfusion temporal changes in hemodynamic parameters were obtained in angiographically normal nonculprit vessels before and 1-h after reopening of the culprit vessel. Intracoronary pressure and flow velocity data were compared using pairwise analyses (before and 1-h after reperfusion)., Results: In the non-culprit vessel, compared to the pre-reperfusion state, mean resting average peak velocity (33.4 ± 9.4 to 25.0 ± 4.9 cm/s, P < 0.001) and mean hyperemic average peak velocity (53.5 ± 14.4 to 42.1 ± 10.66 cm/s, P = 0.001) significantly decreased; whereas baseline (3.2 ± 1.0 to 4.0 ± 1.0 mmHg.cm -1 .s, P < 0.001) and hyperemic microvascular resistance (HMR) (1.9 ± 0.6 to 2.4 ± 0.7 mmHg.cm -1 .s, P < 0.001) and mean zero flow pressure (Pzf) values (32.5 ± 6.9 to 37.6 ± 8.3 mmHg, P = 0.003) significantly increased 1-h after reperfusion. In particular, the magnitude of changes in HMR and Pzf values following reperfusion were more prominent in patients with larger infarct size and with higher extent of MVD in the culprit vessel territory., Conclusion: Reperfusion-related microvascular injury extends to involve remote myocardial territory in relation to the magnitude of the adjacent infarction and infarct-zone MVD. (GUARD Clinical TrialsNCT02732080)., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims: To study if any qualitative or quantitative optical coherence tomography (OCT) variables in combination with thin cap fibroatheroma (TCFA) patients could improve the identification of lesions at risk for future major adverse cardiac events (MACEs)., Methods and Results: From the combined optical coherence tomography morphologic and fractional flow reserve hemodynamic assessment of non- culprit lesions to better predict adverse event outcomes in diabetes mellitus patients: COMBINE (OCT-FFR) trial database (NCT02989740), we performed a detailed assessment OCT qualitative and quantitative variables in TCFA carrying diabetes mellitus (DM) patients with vs. without MACE during follow-up. MACEs were defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, clinically driven target lesion revascularization, and hospitalization for unstable angina. From the 390 fractional flow reserve (FFR)-negative DM patients, 98 (25.2%) had ≥1 OCT-detected TCFA, of which 13 (13.3%) had MACE and 85 (86.7%) were event-free (non-MACE). The baseline characteristics were similar between both groups; however, a smaller minimal lumen area (MLA) and lower mean FFR value were observed in MACE group (1.80 vs. 2.50 mm2, P = 0.01, and 0.85 vs. 0.89, P = 0.02, respectively). Prevalence of healed plaque (HP) was higher in the MACE group (53.85 vs. 21.18%, P = 0.01). TCFA were predominantly located proximal to the MLA. TCFA area was smaller in the MACE group, while no difference was observed regarding the lesion area., Conclusion: Within TCFA carrying patients, a smaller MLA, lower FFR values, and TCFA location adjacent to a HP were associated with future MACE. Carpet-like measured lesion area surface was similar, while the TCFA area was smaller in the MACE arm, and predominantly located proximal to the MLA., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: Nothing to Disclose., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is a computation of fractional flow reserve (FFR) based on invasive coronary angiographic images. Calculating QFR is less invasive than measuring FFR and may be associated with lower costs. Current evidence supports the call for an adequately powered randomised comparison of QFR and FFR for the evaluation of intermediate coronary stenosis. The aim of the FAVOR III Europe Japan trial is to investigate if a QFR-based diagnostic strategy yields a non-inferior 12-month clinical outcome compared with a standard FFR-guided strategy in the evaluation of patients with intermediary coronary stenosis. FAVOR III Europe Japan is an investigator-initiated, randomised, clinical outcome, non-inferiority trial scheduled to randomise 2,000 patients with either 1) stable angina pectoris and intermediate coronary stenosis, or 2) indications for functional assessment of at least 1 non-culprit lesion after acute myocardial infarction. Up to 40 international centres will randomise patients to either a QFR-based or a standard FFR-based diagnostic strategy. The primary endpoint of major adverse cardiovascular events is a composite of all-cause mortality, any myocardial infarction, and any unplanned coronary revascularisation at 12 months. QFR could emerge as an adenosine- and wire-free alternative to FFR, making the functional evaluation of intermediary coronary stenosis less invasive and more cost-effective.

Introduction and Objectives: Changes in sex hormone levels are a known triggering factor for spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) in women. However, it is unknown whether exposure to exogenous hormone therapy (HT) at the time of SCAD presentation modifies the clinical course of this condition. We investigated the association between HT in female patients presenting with SCAD and short-term clinical outcomes., Methods: We enrolled consecutive patients presenting with SCAD from the DISCO-IT/SPA (dissezioni spontanee coronariche Italian-Spanish) registry. Women on HT (estrogens, progestagens, or gonadotropins) at the time of presentation were identified, and their clinical characteristics and short-term outcomes were compared with those not receiving active HT. The outcome measure was nonfatal myocardial infarction and/or unplanned percutaneous coronary intervention during the first 28 days after the index catheterization., Results: Of 224 women presenting with SCAD (mean age 52.0±10.0 years), 39 (17.4%) were currently using HT while 185 (82.6%) were not. No significant differences were noted in the baseline demographics, clinical presentation, angiographic features, or initial treatment received between the 2 groups. All patients on systemic HT (n=36, 92%) discontinued it at the time of diagnosis. The composite outcome occurred in 7 (17.9%) patients with prior HT compared with 14 (7.6%) without (P=.039). After multivariable adjustment, HT remained associated with the composite outcome recorded in the first 28 days of follow-up (HR, 3.53; 95%CI, 1.30-9.61; P=.013)., Conclusions: In women with SCAD, exposure to HT at the time of clinical presentation was associated with short-term recurrent cardiovascular events such as nonfatal myocardial infarction and/or unplanned percutaneous revascularization., (Copyright © 2023 Sociedad Española de Cardiología. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Background: The long-term prognostic implications of fractional flow reserve (FFR)-negative lesions hosting vulnerable plaques remain unsettled., Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of non-ischaemic lesions hosting optical coherence tomography (OCT)-detected thin-cap fibroatheromas (TCFA) with first and recurrent cardiovascular events during follow-up up to 5 years in a diabetes mellitus (DM) patient population., Methods: COMBINE OCT-FFR is a prospective, international, double-blind, natural history study. Patients with DM and with ≥1 FFR-negative lesion were classified into 2 groups based on the presence or absence of ≥1 TCFA lesion. The primary endpoint (PE) is a composite of cardiac mortality, target vessel-related myocardial infarction (TV-MI), clinically driven target lesion revascularisation (TLR), or unstable angina (UA) requiring hospitalisation during follow-up up to 5 years., Results: Among 390 DM patients (age 67.5±9 years; 37% female) with ≥1 FFR-negative lesion, 292 (74.9%) were TCFA-negative while 98 (25.1%) were TCFA-positive. The PE occurred more frequently in TCFA-positive than in TCFA-negative patients (21.4% vs 8.2%, hazard ratio [HR] 2.89, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.61-5.20; p<0.001; 6.42 vs 2.46 events per 100 patient-years, rate ratio [RR] 2.61, 95% CI: 1.38-4.90; p=0.002). Furthermore, when TV-MI, TLR, and UA were treated as recurrent components of the PE, TCFA-positive patients experienced a higher risk of recurrent events (HR 2.89, 95% CI; 1.74-4.80; p<0.001; 13.45 vs 2.87 events per 100 patient-years, RR 4.69, 95% CI: 2.86-7.83; p<0.001). A multivariable analysis identified the presence of TCFA as an independent predictor of the PE (HR 2.76, 95% CI: 1.53-4.97; p<0.001)., Conclusions: OCT-detected TCFA-positive lesions, although not ischaemia-generating, are associated with an increased risk of adverse events during long-term follow-up., Clinicaltrials: gov: NCT02989740.

Background: The impact of myocardial revascularization on outcomes and prognosis in patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) without left main (LM) disease or reduced left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) may be influenced by the revascularization strategy adopted., Methods: We performed a network meta-analysis including 18 randomized controlled trials comparing different revascularization strategies, including angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), physiology-guided PCI and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), in patients with CCS without LM disease or reduced LVEF., Results: Compared with medical therapy, all revascularization strategies were associated with a reduction of the primary endpoint, as defined in each trial, the extent of which was modest with angiography-guided PCI (IRR 0.86, 95% CI 0.75-0.99) and greater with physiology-guided PCI (IRR 0.60, 95% CI 0.47-0.77) and CABG (IRR 0.58, 95% CI 0.48-0.70). Moreover, angiography-guided PCI was associated with an increase of the primary endpoint compared to physiology-guided PCI (IRR 1.43, 95% CI 1.14-1.79) and CABG (IRR 1.49, 95% CI 1.27-1.74). CABG was the only strategy associated with reduced myocardial infarction (IRR 0.68, 95% CI 0.52-0.90), cardiovascular death (IRR 0.76, 95% CI 0.64-0.89), and all-cause death (IRR 0.87, 95% CI 0.77-0.99), but increased stroke (IRR 1.69, 95% CI 1.04-2.76)., Conclusions: In CCS patients without LM disease or reduced LVEF, physiology-guided PCI and CABG are associated with better outcomes than angiography-guided PCI. Compared with medical therapy, CABG is the only revascularization strategy associated with a reduction of myocardial infarction and death rates, at the cost of higher risk of stroke., Study Registration: This study is registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022313612)., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest M.G. declares that he has received consulting fees or honoraria from Terumo, outside the present work. D.C. declares that he has received consulting and speaker's fee from Amgen, Daiichi Sankyo, Sanofi, Tarumo outside the present work. G.B.-Z. has consulted for Cardionovum, CrannMed, InnovHeart, Meditrial, Opsens Medical, Replycare and Terumo, outside the present work. I.P. reports consultant or speaker fees from Biotronik, ABIOMED, Terumo, Philips, Sanofi, Amgen, Daiichi-Sankyo, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, and PIAM, outside the present work. F.B. declares that he has received consulting fees or honoraria from Abbott, Abiomed, Medtronic and Terumo, outside the present work. C.T. declares that he has received consulting fees or honoraria from Abbott, Abiomed, Medtronic and Terumo, outside the present work. R.DC. declares that he has received consulting fees or honoraria from Daiichi-Sankyo, Novartis, Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, BMS/Pfizer, Janssen, Novartis, AspraZeneca, Milestone, Lilly, Menarini, Guidotti, outside the present work. J.E. declares that he has participated as speaker at educational events and advisory board member for Abbott, Boston Scientific and Philips. D.J.A. declares that he has received consulting fees or honoraria from Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biosensors, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chiesi, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Haemonetics, Janssen, Merck, PhaseBio, PLx Pharma, Pfizer, and Sanofi, outside the present work. D.J.A. also declares that his institution has received research grants from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biosensors, CeloNova, CSL Behring, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, Matsutani Chemical Industry Co., Merck, Novartis, Osprey Medical, Renal Guard Solutions and Scott R. MacKenzie Foundation. F.C. declares that he has received consulting and speaker's fee from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Servier, BMS, outside the present work. F.C. also declares to be member of the advisory board of GlyCardial Diagnostics. The remaining authors report no disclosures., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background Long-term outcomes of ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction in patients with diabetes have been barely investigated. The objective of this analysis from the EXAMINATION-EXTEND (10-Years Follow-Up of the EXAMINATION trial) trial was to compare 10-year outcomes of patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction with and without diabetes. Methods and Results Of the study population, 258 patients had diabetes and 1240 did not. The primary end point was patient-oriented composite end point of all-cause death, any myocardial infarction, or any revascularization. Secondary end points were the individual components of the primary combined end point, cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, and stent thrombosis. All end points were adjusted for potential confounders. At 10 years, patients with diabetes showed a higher incidence of patient-oriented composite end point compared with those without (46.5% versus 33.0%; adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.31 [95% CI, 1.05-1.61]; P =0.016) mainly driven by a higher incidence of any revascularization (24.4% versus 16.6%; adjusted HR, 1.61 [95% CI, 1.19-2.17]; P =0.002). Specifically, patients with diabetes had a higher incidence of any revascularization during the first 5 years of follow-up (20.2% versus 12.8%; adjusted HR, 1.57 [95% CI, 1.13-2.19]; P =0.007) compared with those without diabetes. No statistically significant differences were found with respect to the other end points. Conclusions Patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction who had diabetes had worse clinical outcome at 10 years compared with those without diabetes, mainly driven by a higher incidence of any revascularizations in the first 5 years. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04462315.

Background: Prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are often older and present with multiple comorbidities. Ticagrelor monotherapy after a short course of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has emerged as an effective bleeding-avoidance strategy among high-risk patients., Aims: We aimed to examine the effects of ticagrelor with or without aspirin in prior CABG patients undergoing PCI within the TWILIGHT trial., Methods: After 3 months of ticagrelor plus aspirin, patients were randomised to either aspirin or placebo, in addition to ticagrelor, for 12 months and compared by prior CABG status. The primary endpoint was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2, 3 or 5 bleeding. The key secondary endpoint was all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke., Results: Out of 7,119 patients, a total of 703 (10.8%) patients had prior CABG within the randomised cohort. Prior CABG patients had more comorbidities and a higher incidence of BARC type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding and death, MI or stroke at 1 year after randomisation, compared with patients without prior CABG. Ticagrelor monotherapy was associated with significantly less BARC 2, 3, or 5 bleeding among prior CABG patients compared with DAPT (4.9% vs 9.6%, hazard ratio [HR] 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.28 to 0.90; p interaction =0.676) and similar rates of death, MI or stroke (10.0% vs 8.7%, HR 1.14, 95% CI: 0.70 to 1.87; p interaction =0.484). When comparing target vessel type, treatment effects were consistent among graft- and native-vessel interventions., Conclusions: In high-risk patients with prior CABG, ticagrelor monotherapy reduced bleeding without compromising ischaemic outcomes compared with ticagrelor plus aspirin.

Background: Short-term outcomes following ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in women are worse than in men, with a higher mortality rate. It is unknown whether sex plays a role in very long term outcomes., Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess whether very long term outcomes following STEMI treatment are influenced by sex., Methods: EXAMINATION-EXTEND (10-Year Follow-Up of the EXAMINATION Trial) was an investigator-driven 10-year follow-up of the EXAMINATION (A Clinical Evaluation of Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stents in the Treatment of Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction) trial, which randomly 1:1 assigned 1,498 patients with STEMI to receive either everolimus-eluting stents or bare-metal stents. The present study was a subanalysis according to sex. The primary endpoint was the composite patient-oriented endpoint (all-cause death, any myocardial infarction, or any revascularization) at 10 years. Secondary endpoints were individual components of the primary endpoint. All endpoints were adjusted for age., Results: Among 1,498 patients with STEMI, 254 (17%) were women. Overall, women were older, with more arterial hypertension and less smoking history than men. At 10 years, no difference was observed between women and men for the patient-oriented composite endpoint (40.6% vs 34.2%; adjusted HR: 1.14; 95% CI: 0.91-1.42; P = 0.259). There was a trend toward higher all-cause death in women vs men (27.6% vs 19.4%; adjusted HR: 1.30; 95% CI: 0.99-1.71; P = 0.063), with no difference in cardiac death or other endpoints., Conclusions: At very long term follow-up, there were no differences in the combined patient-oriented endpoint between women and men, with a trend toward higher all-cause death in women not driven by cardiac death. The present findings underline the need for focused personalized medicine in women after percutaneous revascularization aimed at both cardiovascular and sex-specific risk factor control and targeted treatment. (10-Years Follow-Up of the EXAMINATION Trial [EXAMINAT10N]; NCT04462315)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures This study was an investigator-driven clinical trial conducted by the Hospital Clinic of Barcelona. The EXAMINATION-EXTEND study was funded by an unrestricted grant from Abbott Vascular to the Spanish Heart Foundation (promoter). The authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Since optical coherence tomography (OCT) was first performed in humans two decades ago, this imaging modality has been widely adopted in research on coronary atherosclerosis and adopted clinically for the optimization of percutaneous coronary intervention. In the past 10 years, substantial advances have been made in the understanding of in vivo vascular biology using OCT. Identification by OCT of culprit plaque pathology could potentially lead to a major shift in the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes. Detection by OCT of healed coronary plaque has been important in our understanding of the mechanisms involved in plaque destabilization and healing with the rapid progression of atherosclerosis. Accurate detection by OCT of sequelae from percutaneous coronary interventions that might be missed by angiography could improve clinical outcomes. In addition, OCT has become an essential diagnostic modality for myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries. Insight into neoatherosclerosis from OCT could improve our understanding of the mechanisms of very late stent thrombosis. The appropriate use of OCT depends on accurate interpretation and understanding of the clinical significance of OCT findings. In this Review, we summarize the state of the art in cardiac OCT and facilitate the uniform use of this modality in coronary atherosclerosis. Contributions have been made by clinicians and investigators worldwide with extensive experience in OCT, with the aim that this document will serve as a standard reference for future research and clinical application., (© 2022. Springer Nature Limited.)

Background Intramyocardial edema and hemorrhage are key pathological mechanisms in the development of reperfusion-related microvascular damage in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. These processes may be facilitated by abrupt restoration of intracoronary pressure and flow triggered by primary percutaneous coronary intervention. We investigated whether pressure-controlled reperfusion via gradual reopening of the infarct-related artery may limit microvascular injury in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Methods and Results A total of 83 patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction were assessed for eligibility and 53 who did not meet inclusion criteria were excluded. The remaining 30 patients with totally occluded infarct-related artery were randomized to the pressure-controlled reperfusion with delayed stenting (PCRDS) group (n=15) or standard primary percutaneous coronary intervention with immediate stenting (IS) group (n=15) (intention-to-treat population). Data from 5 patients in each arm were unsuitable to be included in the final analysis. Finally, 20 patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention who were randomly assigned to either IS (n=10) or PCRDS (n=10) were included. In the PCRDS arm, a 1.5-mm balloon was used to achieve initial reperfusion with thrombolysis in myocardial infarction grade 3 flow and, subsequently, to control distal intracoronary pressure over a 30-minute monitoring period (MP) until stenting was performed. In both study groups, continuous assessment of coronary hemodynamics with intracoronary pressure and Doppler flow velocity was performed, with a final measurement of zero flow pressure (primary end point of the study) at the end of a 60-minute MP. There were no complications associated with IS or PCRDS. PCRDS effectively led to lower distal intracoronary pressures than IS over 30 minutes after reperfusion (71.2±9.37 mm Hg versus 90.13±12.09 mm Hg, P =0.001). Significant differences were noted between study arms in the microcirculatory response over MP. Microvascular perfusion progressively deteriorated in the IS group and at the end of MP, and hyperemic microvascular resistance was significantly higher in the IS arm as compared with the PCDRS arm (2.83±0.56 mm Hg.s.cm -1 versus 1.83±0.53 mm Hg.s.cm -1 , P =0.001). The primary end point (zero flow pressure) was significantly lower in the PCRDS group than in the IS group (41.46±17.85 mm Hg versus 76.87±21.34 mm Hg, P =0.001). In the whole study group (n=20), reperfusion pressures measured at predefined stages in the early reperfusion period showed robust associations with zero flow pressure values measured at the end of the 1-hour MP (immediately after reperfusion: r =0.782, P <0.001; at the 10th minute: r =0.796, P <0.001; and at the 20th minute: r =0.702, P =0.001) and peak creatine kinase MB level (immediately after reperfusion: r =0.653, P =0.002; at the 10th minute: r =0.597, P =0.007; and at the 20th minute: r =0.538, P =0.017). Enzymatic myocardial infarction size was lower in the PCRDS group than in the IS group with peak troponin T (5395±2991 ng/mL versus 8874±1927 ng/mL, P =0.006) and creatine kinase MB (163.6±93.4 IU/L versus 542.2±227.4 IU/L, P <0.001). Conclusions In patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, pressure-controlled reperfusion of the culprit vessel by means of gradual reopening of the occluded infarct-related artery (PCRDS) led to better-preserved coronary microvascular integrity and smaller myocardial infarction size, without an increase in procedural complications, compared with IS. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02732080.

Aims: To evaluate predictors of electrical storm (ES), including chronic total occlusion in an infarct-related coronary artery (infarct-related artery CTO, IRACTO), in a cohort of patients with prior myocardial infarction (MI) and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD)., Methods: Multicenter observational cohort study including 643 consecutive patients with prior MI and a first ICD implanted between 2005 and 2018 at three tertiary hospitals. All the patients included in the study had undergone a diagnostic coronary angiography before ICD implantation. The variable prior ventricular arrhythmias (VA+) was positive in patients with secondary prevention ICDs and in those with at least one appropriate ICD therapy after primary prevention implantation., Results: During a median follow-up of 42 months 59 patients (9%) suffered ES. The presence of at least one IRACTO not revascularized (IRACTO-NR) was associated with a significantly higher cumulative incidence of ES (14.5% vs 4.8%, p < 0.001). IRACTO-NR maintained a significant association with ES after adjustment for potential confounders (HR 2.3, p = 0.005) and was an independent predictor of ES together with VA+ and LVEF. The best cut-off of LVEF to predict ES was ≤38%. A risk-prediction model based on IRACTO-NR, VA+ and LVEF≤38% identified three categories of ES risk (low, intermediate and high), with progressively increasing cumulative incidence of ES (2.2%, 9% and 20%)., Conclusion: In a cohort of patients with prior MI and ICD, IRACTO-NR is an independent predictor of ES. A new risk-prediction model allowed the identification of three categories of risk, with potentially important clinical implications., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Permanent drug-eluting stents are associated with a steady increase in late complications attributed to persistent inflammation and poor vessel remodelling. Bioresorbable scaffolds have been developed to overcome such long-term limitations by providing temporary vessel support and disappearing thereafter. We aimed to assess the long-term outcomes of an absorbable metallic scaffold at 5 years., Methods: BIOSOLVE-II is an international, multi-centre, first-in-human study assessing the safety and performance of the sirolimus-eluting absorbable metal scaffold DREAMS 2G (commercial name Magmaris) in patients with a maximum of two de novo lesions. After 3 years, follow-up was extended to 5 years with the endpoints of target lesion failure and rate of definite or probable stent thrombosis., Results: A total of 123 patients with 123 lesions were enrolled. Lesions were 12.6 ± 4.5 mm long and 2.7 ± 0.4 mm in diameter, 43.4% were class B2/C lesions, and calcification was moderate to severe in 10.6%. At 5 years, 5.4% of patients had stable angina and 94.6% had no symptoms or ischaemia. Target lesion failure rate was 8.0% [95% confidence interval:4.2;14.9], reflecting 2 cardiac deaths, 2 target-vessel myocardial infarctions, and 6 clinically driven target lesion revascularizations (TLRs). Only one target lesion failure occurred beyond 3 years: a target-vessel myocardial infarction with clinically driven TLR on post-procedure day 1157. One additional non-cardiac death beyond 3 years due to renal failure was reported on day 1777. No definite or probable scaffold thrombosis was observed., Conclusion: The Magmaris scaffold showed favourable long-term safety and clinical performance with low target lesion failure rates and absence of definite or probable scaffold thrombosis throughout 5 years., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest MH reports study grants and personal fees from Biotronik, Abbott Vascular, Cardiac Dimensions, Orbus Neich, and Philips, RT reports personal fees from Biotronik and Abbott Vascular, PAL reports grants from Biotronik, EHC reports grants from Biotronik, AA is a proctor for TAVR implantation for Boston Scientific, CvB reports grants from Abbott Vascular, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic, FJN reports lectures fees paid to his institution from Amgen, Bayer Healthcare, Biotronic, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Daiichi Sankyo, Edwards Lifesciences, Ferrer, Pfizer, Novartis, consultancy fees paid to his institution from Boehringer Ingelheim, and grant support from Bayer Healthcare, and Boston Scientific, WW reports institutional grants from Biotronik and MicroPort, is a co-founder of Argonauts Partners, and received speaker fees from MicroPort, JE reports speaker fee honoraria from Abbott, Biotronik, Bostoms Scientific and Philips, LST received honoraria and conference support from Terumo, Kaneka, Abbott, Medtronic, Alvimedia, Boston Scientific, Biotronik and Asahi Intecc., EE reports speaker honoraria and research grants from Biotronik. HGG reports that MedStar was the core laboratory of the study, RW reports that MedStar was the core laboratory of the study and reports grants and personal fees from Abbott Vascular, AstraZeneca, Biosensors, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Chiesi, personal fees of Amgen, Corindus, Lifetech Medical, Medtronic, Philips Volcano, Pi-Cardia LTD, is an investor of MedAlliance, and grants from Edwards Lifesciences. All other authors have no conflict of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate if patients with prior myocardial infarction (MI) could benefit from ticagrelor monotherapy in terms of bleeding reduction without any compromise in ischemic event prevention., Background: Patients with history of MI who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remain at risk for recurrent ischemic events. The optimal antithrombotic strategy for this cohort remains debated., Methods: In this prespecified analysis of the randomized TWILIGHT (Ticagrelor With Aspirin or Alone in High-Risk Patients after Coronary Intervention) trial, the authors evaluated the impact of history of MI on treatment effect of ticagrelor monotherapy versus ticagrelor plus aspirin in patients undergoing PCI with drug-eluting stent with at least 1 clinical and 1 angiographic high-risk feature and free from adverse events at 3 months after index PCI. The primary endpoint was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding, and the key secondary endpoint was the composite of all-cause death, MI, or stroke, both at 12 months after randomization., Results: A total of 1,937 patients (29.7%) with and 4,595 patients (70.3%) without prior MI were randomized to ticagrelor and placebo or ticagrelor and aspirin. At 1 year after randomization, patients with prior MI experienced higher rates of death, MI, or stroke (5.7% vs 3.2%; P < 0.001) but similar BARC types 2 to 5 bleeding (5.0% vs 5.5%; P = 0.677) compared with patients without prior MI. Ticagrelor monotherapy consistently reduced the risk for the primary bleeding outcome in patients with (3.4% vs 6.7%; HR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.33-0.76) and without (4.2% vs 7.0%; HR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.45-0.76; P interaction  = 0.54) prior MI. Rates of the key secondary ischemic outcome were not significantly different between treatment groups irrespective of history of MI (prior MI, 6.0% vs 5.5% [HR: 1.09; 95% CI: 0.75-1.58]; no prior MI, 3.1% vs 3.3% [HR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.67-1.28]; P interaction  = 0.52)., Conclusions: Ticagrelor monotherapy is associated with significantly lower risk for bleeding events compared with ticagrelor plus aspirin, without any compromise in ischemic prevention, among high-risk patients with history of MI undergoing PCI. (Ticagrelor With Aspirin or Alone in High-Risk Patients After Coronary Intervention [TWILIGHT]; NCT02270242)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures This research was conducted with support from AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP. Dr Baber has received honoraria from AstraZeneca and Boston Scientific. Dr Sharma has received Speakers Bureau fees from Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, and Cardiovascular Systems. Dr Dangas has received personal fees from Biosensors and Philips. Dr Angiolillo has received consulting fees or honoraria from Abbott, Amgen, Aralez, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biosensors, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chiesi, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Haemonetics, Janssen, Merck, PhaseBio, PLx Pharma, Pfizer, Sanofi, and The Medicines Company; has received payments for participation in review activities from CeloNova and St Jude Medical, outside the present work; and has received research grants to his institution from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biosensors, CeloNova, CSL Behring, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, Matsutani Chemical Industry, Merck, Novartis, Osprey Medical, Renal Guard Solutions, and the Scott R. MacKenzie Foundation. Dr Stefanini has received a research grant from Boston Scientific; and has received speaker and consulting fees from Bayer, Braun, Biosensors, Boston Scientific, Daiichi-Sankyo and GADA, outside the submitted work. Dr Gibson has received grants and personal fees from Johnson & Johnson, Janssen, and CSL Behring; has received personal fees from Bayer, AstraZeneca (during the conduct of the study), Angel Medical Corporation, The Medicines Company, the Boston Clinical Research Institute, the Cardiovascular Research Foundation, Gilead Sciences, WebMD, UpToDate in Cardiovascular Medicine, Boehringer Ingelheim, Somahlution, Vereseon, Boston Scientific, the Duke Clinical Research Institute, Medtelligence, Microport, PERT Consortium, Caladrius Biosciences, CeleCor Therapeutics, Thrombolytic Science, Eidos Therapeutics, Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Microdrop, MD Magazine, MJ Health, Samsung, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Revance Therapeutics, Pfizer, GenTech, CytoSorbents, AMAG Pharmaceuticals, Bristol Myers Squibb, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Syneos Health, and Amarin; has received other compensation from nference, Dyad Medical, and Absolutys, and PhaseBio; has received nonfinancial support from the Baim Institute; and has received grants from the SCAD Alliance, outside the submitted work. Dr Mehran has received institutional grants from Abbott Laboratories, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Beth Israel Deaconess, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chiesi, CSL Behring, Daiichi-Sankyo Inc, Medtronic, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, and OrbusNeich; has received personal fees from Boston Scientific, Janssen, Scientific Affairs, Sanofi, and Siemens Medical Solutions; has received consulting fees paid to the institution from Abbott Laboratories and Bristol Myers Squibb; and is an advisory board member (funding paid to the institution) for Spectranetics/Philips/Volcano. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The safety of revascularization deferral according to pressure wire examination in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) has not been fully established., Methods: From a retrospective cohort of 439 patients in whom revascularization was deferred after physiological assessment, we examined the incidence of patient-oriented composite endpoint (POCE: all-cause death, myocardial infarction [MI] and unplanned revascularization) in patients with CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] < 60 mL/min/1.73 m²) and without it., Results: At 4 years of follow-up, the primary endpoint was met by 25.0% of patients with CKD and by 14.4% of patients without CKD (hazard ratio [HR] 1.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.96-2.53, p = 0.071). The incidence of POCE was even higher in patients with an eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m²: 43.8% (HR 3.10, 95% CI 1.08-8.92, p = 0.036). However, no differences were observed in the incidence of MI (4.2% vs. 4.4% in non-CKD), target vessel revascularization (5.8% vs. 5.9%), and target vessel MI (0.8% vs. 4.6%)., Conclusions: Patients with CKD in whom pressure-wire evaluation led to deferral of coronary revascularization develop more POCE in the long term, compared to patients with normal renal function. However, the increase in POCE in patients with CKD was seldom related to deferred vessels, thus suggesting an epiphenomenon of an intrinsically higher cardiovascular risk of CKD patients.

Introduction: Recent randomised clinical trials showed benefit of non-culprit lesion revascularisation in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. However, it remains unclear whether revascularisation should be performed at the index procedure or at a later stage., Methods and Analysis: The instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) Guided Multivessel Revascularisation During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Myocardial Infarction trial is a multicentre, randomised controlled prospective open-label trial with blinded evaluation of endpoints. After successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), eligible STEMI patients with residual non-culprit lesions are randomised, to instantaneous wave-free ratio guided treatment of non-culprit lesions during the index procedure versus deferred cardiac MR-guided management within 4 days to 6 weeks. The primary endpoint of the study is the combined occurrence of all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction and hospitalisation for heart failure at 12 months follow-up. Clinical follow-up includes questionnaires at 3 months and outpatient visits at 6 months and 12 months after primary PCI. Furthermore, a cost-effectiveness analysis will be performed., Ethics and Dissemination: Permission to conduct this trial has been granted by the Medical Ethical Committee of the Amsterdam University Medical Centres (loc. VUmc, ID NL60107.029.16). The primary results of this trial will be shared in a main article and subgroup analyses or spin-off studies will be shared in secondary papers., Trial Registration Number: NCT03298659., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objectives: To evaluate whether the revascularization of a coronary chronic total occlusion in an infarct-related artery (IRACTO) may be associated with lower recurrence of ventricular arrhythmias (VA) among patients with a secondary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD)., Background: IRACTO is increasingly recognized as an independent predictor of VA. It is unknown whether IRACTO revascularization can reduce the burden of VA., Methods: Multicenter observational cohort study that included consecutive patients with prior myocardial infarction and secondary prevention ICD. The primary endpoint was any appropriate ICD therapy., Results: Among the 460 patients included, 269 (58%) had at least one IRACTO at the coronary angiogram performed before ICD implantation; of these, 20 (7%) had their IRACTO successfully revascularized (IRACTO-R) afterwards. During a median follow-up of 48 months, 229 patients (49%) had at least one appropriate ICD therapy. Patients with IRACTO not revascularized (IRACTO-NR) had the highest incidence of ICD therapies (65%) while patients with IRACTO-R had the lowest (10%, p < .001). In the entire cohort, IRACTO-NR was an independent predictor of appropriate ICD therapies (HR 2.85, p < .001) and appropriate ICD shocks (HR 2.94, p < .001). Among patients with IRACTO at baseline, IRACTO-R was independently associated with a marked reduction of appropriate ICD therapies (HR 0.12, p = .002) and appropriate ICD shocks (HR 0.21, p = .03)., Conclusions: In patients with prior myocardial infarction and secondary prevention ICD, IRACTO revascularization was independently associated with a markedly lower incidence of appropriate ICD therapies and shocks. These results should be corroborated by larger prospective studies., (© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: The Coronary Artery Tree description and Lesion EvaluaTion (CatLet) score accommodating the variability in coronary anatomy is a recently developed and comprehensive angiographic scoring system aimed at assisting in risk-stratification of patients with coronary artery disease. However, a validation of this angiographic scoring system is lacking., Methods: The CatLet score was calculated retrospectively in 308 consecutively enrolled patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. The primary endpoint, major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), was stratified according to CatLet tertiles: CatLetlow ≤14 (n = 124), CatLetmid 15-21 (n = 82) and CatLettop ≥22 (n = 102)., Results: The CatLet score alone or after adjusting for a broad spectrum of risk factors, significantly predicted clinical outcomes at a median 4.3-year follow-up. Multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (95%CI)/unit higher score were 1.05 (1.04-1.07) for MACCE, 1.06 (1.04-1.07) for cardiac death, and 1.05 (1.04-1.07) for all-cause death. When compared to the SYNTAX score, improved discrimination and better calibration of this CatLet score resulted in a significantly refined risk stratification. The overall category-free net reclassification improvement afforded by this CatLet score was as follows: 37.2% (p = .008) for MACCEs, 35.5% (p = .0249) for cardiac death, and 31.8% (p = .0316) for all-cause death., Conclusions: The ability to integrate the variability in coronary anatomy into angiographic scoring makes the CatLet score a more specific tool for outcome predictions in AMI. (http://www.chictr.org.cn. Unique identifiers: ChiCTR-POC-17013536)., (© 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate temporal changes in coronary hemodynamic and physiological indexes in the non-infarct-related artery (IRA), which might be affected by adjacent infarcted myocardium, using an experimental animal model of acute myocardial infarction., Background: There has been debate on the reliability of fractional flow reserve and resting pressure-derived indexes, including instantaneous wave-free ratio, in the non-IRA in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction., Methods: In Yorkshire swine, acute myocardial infarction was simulated with selective balloon occlusion at the left circumflex coronary artery as the IRA for 30 min. Non-IRA stenosis was created using bare-metal stent implantation in the left anterior descending coronary artery 4 weeks before the experiments. Serial changes in systemic hemodynamic status, coronary pressure, and Doppler-derived coronary flow velocity were measured in a nonoccluded left anterior descending coronary artery as the non-IRA from baseline, balloon occlusion of the left circumflex coronary artery, and 15 min after reperfusion of the left circumflex coronary artery., Results: Among the 6 experimental subjects, the median diameter stenosis of the non-IRA was 33.9% (interquartile range: 21.7% to 46.1%). During balloon occlusion of the IRA, there were transient significant changes in both resting and hyperemic aortic pressure, distal coronary pressure, averaged peak velocity, transstenotic pressure gradient, and microvascular resistance of the non-IRA (p < 0.020 for all). After reperfusion of the IRA, the resting averaged peak velocity (p = 0.002) and resting transstenotic pressure gradient (p = 0.004) were significantly increased and resting microvascular resistance (p = 0.004) was significantly decreased compared with their values in the baseline phase. However, the hyperemic averaged peak velocity (p = 0.479), hyperemic transstenotic pressure gradient (p = 0.778), and hyperemic microvascular resistance (p = 0.816) were not significantly different compared with those in the baseline phase. After reperfusion, fractional flow reserve in the non-IRA was not significantly different (0.94 ± 0.01 vs. 0.93 ± 0.01; p = 0.353), while coronary flow reserve (1.93 ± 0.07 vs. 1.36 ± 0.07; p = 0.025) and instantaneous wave-free ratio (0.97 ± 0.01 vs. 0.93 ± 0.01; p = 0.001) were significantly lower than baseline values., Conclusions: In a porcine model of acute myocardial infarction, occlusion of the IRA induced significant changes in systemic hemodynamic status and coronary circulatory indexes of the non-IRA. However, after reperfusion of the IRA, fractional flow reserve did not change significantly, whereas coronary flow reserve and instantaneous wave-free ratio showed significant changes compared with baseline values., (Copyright © 2020 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Importance: Invasive physiologic indices such as fractional flow reserve (FFR) and instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) are used in clinical practice. Nevertheless, comparative prognostic outcomes of iFR-guided and FFR-guided treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes have not yet been fully investigated., Objective: To compare 1-year clinical outcomes of iFR-guided or FFR-guided treatment in patients with and without diabetes in the Functional Lesion Assessment of Intermediate Stenosis to Guide Revascularization (DEFINE-FLAIR) trial., Design, Setting, and Participants: The DEFINE-FLAIR trial is a multicenter, international, randomized, double-blinded trial that randomly assigned 2492 patients in a 1:1 ratio to undergo either iFR-guided or FFR-guided coronary revascularization. Patients were eligible for trial inclusion if they had intermediate coronary artery disease (40%-70% diameter stenosis) in at least 1 native coronary artery. Data were analyzed between January 2014 and December 2015., Interventions: According to the study protocol, iFR of 0.89 or less and FFR of 0.80 or less were used as criteria for revascularization. When iFR or FFR was higher than the prespecified threshold, revascularization was deferred., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as the composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or unplanned revascularization at 1 year. The incidence of MACE was compared according to the presence of diabetes in iFR-guided and FFR-guided groups., Results: Among the total trial population (2492 patients), 758 patients (30.4%) had diabetes. Mean age of the patients was 66 years, 76% were men (1868 of 2465), and 80% of patients presented with stable angina (1983 of 2465). In the nondiabetes population (68.5%; 1707 patients), iFR guidance was associated with a significantly higher rate of deferral of revascularization than the FFR-guided group (56.5% [n = 477 of 844] vs 46.6% [n = 402 of 863]; P < .001). However, it was not different between the 2 groups in the diabetes population (42.1% [n = 161 of 382] vs 47.1% [n = 177 of 376]; P = .15). At 1 year, the diabetes population showed a significantly higher rate of MACE than the nondiabetes population (8.6% vs 5.6%; adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.88; 95% CI, 1.28-2.64; P < .001). However, there was no significant difference in MACE rates between iFR-guided and FFR-guided groups in both the diabetes (10.0% vs 7.2%; adjusted HR, 1.33; 95% CI, 0.78-2.25; P = .30) and nondiabetes population (4.7% vs 6.4%; HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.51-1.35; P = .45) (interaction P = .25)., Conclusions and Relevance: The diabetes population showed significantly higher risk of MACE than the nondiabetes population, even with the iFR-guided or FFR-guided treatment. The iFR-guided and FFR-guided treatment showed comparable risk of MACE and provided equal safety in selecting revascularization target among patients with diabetes., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02053038.

Background Concerns exist about reliability of pressure-wire-guided coronary revascularization of non-infarct-related arteries (non- IRA ). We investigated whether physiological assessment of non- IRA during the subacute phase of myocardial infarction might be flawed by microcirculatory dysfunction. Methods and Results We analyzed non- IRA that underwent fractional flow reserve, coronary flow reserve, and the index of microcirculatory resistance assessment. Microcirculation and hyperemic response were evaluated in 49 acute myocardial infarction patients (59 non- IRA ) and compared with a matched control group of 46 stable angina ( SA ) patients (59 vessels). Time between acute myocardial infarction to physiological interrogation was 5.9±2.4 days. Fractional flow reserve was similar in both groups (0.79±0.11 in non- IRA versus 0.80±0.13 in SA vessels, P=0.527). Lower coronary flow reserve values were found in non- IRA compared with SA vessels (1.77 [1.25-2.76] versus 2.44 [1.63-4.00], P=0.018), primarily driven by an increased baseline flow in non- IRA (rest mean transit time 0.58 [0.32-0.83] versus 0.65 s [0.39-1.20], P=0.045), whereas the hyperemic flow was similar (hyperemic mean transit time 0.26 [0.20-0.42] versus 0.26 s [0.18-0.35], P=0.873). No differences were found regarding index of microcirculatory resistance (15.6 [10.4-21.8] in non- IRA versus 16.7 [11.6-23.6] U in SA vessels, P=0.559). During adenosine infusion, the hyperemic response was similar in both groups (non- IRA versus SA vessels) in terms of the resistive reserve ratio (3.1±2.1 versus 3.7±2.2, P=0.118). Conclusions In the subacute phase of myocardial infarction, non- IRA show an increased baseline flow that may cause abnormal coronary flow reserve despite preserved hyperemic flow. In non- IRA , microcirculatory resistance and adenosine-induced hyperemic response are similar to those found in SA patients. From a physiological perspective, these findings support the use of fractional flow reserve to interrogate non- IRA during the subacute phase of myocardial infarction.

Background Quantitative flow ratio ( QFR ) has a high diagnostic accuracy in assessing functional stenoses relevance, as judged by fractional flow reserve ( FFR ). However, its diagnostic performance has not been thoroughly evaluated using instantaneous wave-free ratio ( iFR ) or coronary flow reserve as the reference standard. This study sought to evaluate the diagnostic performance of QFR using other reference standards beyond FFR . Methods and Results We analyzed 182 patients (253 vessels) with stable ischemic heart disease and 82 patients (105 nonculprit vessels) with acute myocardial infarction in whom coronary stenoses were assessed with FFR , iFR, and coronary flow reserve. Contrast QFR analysis of interrogated vessels was performed in blinded fashion by a core laboratory, and its diagnostic performance was evaluated with respect to the other invasive physiological indices. Mean percentage diameter stenosis, FFR , iFR , coronary flow reserve, and QFR were 53.1±19.0%, 0.80±0.13, 0.88±0.12, 3.14±1.30, and 0.81±0.14, respectively. QFR showed higher correlation ( r=0.863 with FFR versus 0.740 with iFR , P<0.001), diagnostic accuracy (90.8% versus 81.3%, P<0.001), and discriminant function (area under the curve=0.953 versus 0.880, P<0.001) when FFR was used as a reference standard than when iFR was used as the reference standard. However, when coronary flow reserve was used as an independent reference standard, FFR , iFR , and QFR showed modest discriminant function (area under the curve=0.682, 0.765, and 0.677, respectively) and there were no significant differences in diagnostic accuracy among FFR , iFR , and QFR (65.4%, 70.6%, and 64.9%; all P values in pairwise comparisons >0.05, overall comparison P=0.061). Conclusions QFR has a high correlation and agreement with respect to both FFR and iFR , although it is better when FFR is used as the comparator. As a pressure-derived index not depending on wire or adenosine, QFR might be a promising tool for improving the adoption rate of physiology-based revascularization in clinical practice.

Background: A total of 40% to 50% of patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction develop microvascular injury (MVI) despite angiographically successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We investigated whether hyperemic microvascular resistance (HMR) immediately after angiographically successful PCI predicts MVI at cardiovascular magnetic resonance and reduced myocardial blood flow at positron emission tomography (PET)., Methods and Results: Sixty patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction were included in this prospective study. Immediately after successful PCI, intracoronary pressure-flow measurements were performed and analyzed off-line to calculate HMR and indices derived from the pressure-velocity loops, including pressure at zero flow. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and H2 (15)O PET imaging were performed 4 to 6 days after PCI. Using cardiovascular magnetic resonance, MVI was defined as a subendocardial recess of myocardium with low signal intensity within a gadolinium-enhanced area. Myocardial perfusion was quantified using H2 (15)O PET. Reference HMR values were obtained in 16 stable patients undergoing coronary angiography. Complete data sets were available in 48 patients of which 24 developed MVI. Adequate pressure-velocity loops were obtained in 29 patients. HMR in the culprit artery in patients with MVI was significantly higher than in patients without MVI (MVI, 3.33±1.50 mm Hg/cm per second versus no MVI, 2.41±1.26 mm Hg/cm per second; P=0.03). MVI was associated with higher pressure at zero flow (45.68±13.16 versus 32.01±14.98 mm Hg; P=0.015). Multivariable analysis showed HMR to independently predict MVI (P=0.04). The optimal cutoff value for HMR was 2.5 mm Hg/cm per second. High HMR was associated with decreased myocardial blood flow on PET (myocardial perfusion reserve <2.0, 3.18±1.42 mm Hg/cm per second versus myocardial perfusion reserve ≥2.0, 2.24±1.19 mm Hg/cm per second; P=0.04)., Conclusions: Doppler-flow-derived physiological indices of coronary resistance (HMR) and extravascular compression (pressure at zero flow) obtained immediately after successful primary PCI predict MVI and decreased PET myocardial blood flow., Clinical Trial Registration Url: http://www.trialregister.nl. Unique identifier: NTR3164., (© 2015 American Heart Association, Inc.)

In patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), the guideline-recommended treatment is mechanical revascularization by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), which is effective at reducing mortality. However, a substantial proportion of patients with AMI develop chronic cardiac failure owing to poor restoration of microvascular function and myocardial perfusion, despite restoration of epicardial vessel patency. This occurrence is called the 'no-reflow' phenomenon. Although pathological and clinical observations initially seemed to support the hypothesis that no-reflow was the result of microvascular obstruction, irreversible microvascular injury and subsequent intramyocardial haemorrhage are now also thought to be important factors in this process. Intramyocardial haemorrhage shares several pathophysiological features with the haemorrhagic transformation that occurs after ischaemic stroke. Understanding of the role of intramyocardial haemorrhage in the no-reflow phenomenon and myocardial injury is crucial to the development of new therapeutic strategies to treat AMI. In this Review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the pathogenesis and clinical relevance of intramyocardial haemorrhage, and discuss diagnostic options and future therapeutic strategies.

Objectives: The goal of this trial was to study the long-term effects of intravenous (IV) metoprolol administration before reperfusion on left ventricular (LV) function and clinical events., Background: Early IV metoprolol during ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has been shown to reduce infarct size when used in conjunction with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI)., Methods: The METOCARD-CNIC (Effect of Metoprolol in Cardioprotection During an Acute Myocardial Infarction) trial recruited 270 patients with Killip class ≤II anterior STEMI presenting early after symptom onset (<6 h) and randomized them to pre-reperfusion IV metoprolol or control group. Long-term magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed on 202 patients (101 per group) 6 months after STEMI. Patients had a minimal 12-month clinical follow-up., Results: Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at the 6 months MRI was higher after IV metoprolol (48.7 ± 9.9% vs. 45.0 ± 11.7% in control subjects; adjusted treatment effect 3.49%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44% to 6.55%; p = 0.025). The occurrence of severely depressed LVEF (≤35%) at 6 months was significantly lower in patients treated with IV metoprolol (11% vs. 27%, p = 0.006). The proportion of patients fulfilling Class I indications for an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) was significantly lower in the IV metoprolol group (7% vs. 20%, p = 0.012). At a median follow-up of 2 years, occurrence of the pre-specified composite of death, heart failure admission, reinfarction, and malignant arrhythmias was 10.8% in the IV metoprolol group versus 18.3% in the control group, adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 0.55; 95% CI: 0.26 to 1.04; p = 0.065. Heart failure admission was significantly lower in the IV metoprolol group (HR: 0.32; 95% CI: 0.015 to 0.95; p = 0.046)., Conclusions: In patients with anterior Killip class ≤II STEMI undergoing pPCI, early IV metoprolol before reperfusion resulted in higher long-term LVEF, reduced incidence of severe LV systolic dysfunction and ICD indications, and fewer heart failure admissions. (Effect of METOprolol in CARDioproteCtioN During an Acute Myocardial InfarCtion. The METOCARD-CNIC Trial; NCT01311700)., (Copyright © 2014 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Conduction disorders in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are associated with high mortality. Previous studies have analyzed the implications of AVB in acute coronary syndrome treated with fibrinolysis. However, the implications of AVB in patients with STEMI treated with primary angioplasty have not been sufficiently studied., Material and Methods: 913 patients with STEMI treated with primary angioplasty. All clinical, electrocardiographic and angiographic variables were collected., Results: AVB was documented in 115 patients (12.6%). On admission, AVB was present in 70 (7.7%), and persistent at hospital discharge in 36 (3.9 %). Within these, first-degree AVB was present in 29 (3.2%), second-degree in 27 (3%) and third-degree in 73 (8%). AVB was more frequent in women, elderly, hypertensive, diabetic, with worse functional class (Killip class > 2) and with higher incidence at inferior infarctions (P < 0.05). AVB in general and, more specifically, third-degree AVB was associated with a higher mortality (20.5% versus 5.7%; P < 0.001), re-infarction (8.2% versus 3.6%; P = 0.06) and a greater incidence of cardiogenic shock (33.3% versus 14%; P < 0.001). Interestingly, these events were more common in patients who had persistent AVB at hospital discharge than in those with transitory AVB or present at admission AVB. In the multivariate analysis, persistent AVB at hospital discharge proved to be an independent predictor of cardiovascular events (death and recurrent infarction), not the rest of AVB., Conclusions: AVB in patients who underwent primary angioplasty is associated with a worse prognosis while is in-hospital. This risk is particularly high in patients who had persistent AVB at hospital discharge.

Aims: Although the benefit of concomitant thrombus aspiration (TA) in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) treatment of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has been demonstrated, very little information is available on its safety as a lone revascularisation technique in this setting. We present our experience in a cohort of patients with STEMI treated only with TA, without concomitant interventional devices., Methods and Results: In 28 patients with STEMI, PPCI was performed using only TA on the grounds of an excellent angiographic result and in order to avoid the potential risks associated with balloon dilatation or stenting. The patients were younger than in the overall PPCI population (n=1,737) at our institution (52±18 vs. 63±14 years, p<0.001), with a history of atrial fibrillation in six (21%), cocaine abuse in three (11%) and mechanical cardiac valves in two (7%). Twenty-eight patients (89%) presented STEMI with Killip class I, two (7%) with cardiogenic shock, and two (7%) with sudden cardiac death. A significant reduction in TIMI thrombus grade (5 [4-5] to 1 [0-1.75], p<0.001) and coronary stenosis percentage (%) (87.2±21.3 to 11.3±0.9, p<0.001) as well as an increase in final TIMI flow (0 [0-2] to 3 [3-3], p<0.001) and minimum luminal diameter (mm) (0.89±1.01 to 2.42±0.70, p<0.001) were noted after TA. Transient no-reflow phenomenon, residual intracoronary thrombus and minor distal thrombus embolisation were observed in two (7.1%), 11 (39.3%) and 10 (25.7%) patients, respectively. All but one patient remained asymptomatic during hospital admission. Scheduled control angiography was performed 6±2 days (min-max, 3-10 days) after PPCI in 11 (39%) patients, demonstrating coronary artery patency and TIMI flow grade 3 in all patients. During clinical follow-up, successfully performed in all patients at 40±23 months (min-max, six to 95 months), there was one sudden cardiac death (4%) and three (11%) non-cardiac deaths. One patient (4%) was admitted with non-STEMI (new coronary angiogram without stenosis) and the remaining 22 (78.5%) remained asymptomatic and free of cardiac events., Conclusions: Our series suggests that lone TA might be safely performed as a primary revascularisation procedure in STEMI in selected cases. Further information based on additional and larger studies is recommended to confirm our findings.

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) has been associated with a poor prognosis in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. There is considerable controversy regarding the prognostic implications of different types of AF., Methods and Results: We analyzed 913 patients consecutively admitted to our center with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing a primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Clinical, ECG, and angiographic data were collected. We carried out univariate and multivariate analysis, using a combined endpoint of death, reinfarction, stroke, and clinically relevant bleeding. AF was documented in 117 patients. Among them, 25 presented AF at admission (previous AF) and 92 developed new-onset AF (66% transient, 13% persistent). Patients with AF were older, more frequently men, and had a worse Killip class, and a poorer left-ventricular ejection fraction. When analyzing the different types of AF, patients with new-onset AF (persistent and transient) had a higher Killip class and a worse left-ventricular ejection fraction. AF was associated with significantly higher in-hospital mortality and with a greater incidence of in-hospital adverse events. An increase in in-hospital mortality was recorded both for previous and for new-persistent AF, but after adjusting for confounding factors, only persistent AF was found to carry a worse short-term prognosis., Conclusion: In patients undergoing primary angioplasty in the stent era, AF is associated with a poor prognosis. This risk appears to be particularly high among patients with persistent AF.

The use of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) as a primary treatment for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has contributed to save lives. But, in addition to this, it has generated new opportunities to study the culprit and non-culprit arteries with intracoronary imaging during and after reperfusion treatments, and thus to get a richer view of this syndrome. From this perspective, intracoronary imaging has contributed to our knowledge of AMI in a number of ways: it has complemented the available information on the substrate of AMI with in-vivo observations, reinforcing the current pathophysiological paradigm on this entity; it has allowed longitudinal documentation on the reparative vascular processes at the culprit lesion over the months and years following the acute event; it has generated valuable observations on the vascular responses to interventions performed during primary PCI, such as implantation of drug eluting stents (DES); it has been used to guide or monitor specific interventions, either pharmacological agents like antithrombotics or devices like thrombectomy catheters or stents, at the culprit stenosis of AMI; and it has revealed the characteristics of concomitant atheromatosis in non-culprit vessels. In this article, we review the available literature on these different aspects.

The presence of bundle branch block (BBB) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction has been associated with a poor outcome. However, the implications of BBB in patients undergoing primary angioplasty in the stent era are poorly established. Furthermore, the prognostic implications of BBB type (right vs left and previous vs transient or persistent) remain unknown. We analyzed the data from 913 consecutive patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty. All clinical, electrocardiographic, and angiographic data were prospectively collected. The median follow-up period was 19 months. The primary end point was the combined outcome of death and reinfarction. BBB was documented in 140 patients (15%). Right BBB (RBBB) was present in 119 patients (13%) and was previous in 27 (23%), persistent in 45 (38%), and transient in 47 (39%). Left BBB (LBBB) was present in 21 patients (2%) and was previous in 8 (38%), persistent in 9 (43%), and transient in 4 (19%). Patients with BBB were older, and more frequently had diabetes, anterior infarctions, a greater Killip class, a lower left ventricular ejection fraction, and greater mortality (all p <0.005) than patients without BBB. The short- and long-term primary outcome occurred more frequently in patients with persistent RBBB/LBBB than in those with previous or transient RBBB/LBBB. On multivariate analysis, persistent RBBB/LBBB emerged as an independent predictor of death and reinfarction. In conclusion, in patients undergoing primary angioplasty in the stent era, BBB is associated with poor short- and long-term prognosis. This risk appears to be particularly high among patients with persistent BBB., (Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), those with multivessel disease have worse prognosis, mainly due to a higher frequency of cardiogenic shock (CS) at admission. The aim of this study was to identify clinical and angiographic characteristics of patients with STEMI, multivessel disease and CS at admission referred to primary PCI., Methods: We studied 630 patients with STEMI treated with primary PCI within 12 h after symptoms onset. Multivessel disease was defined as the presence of >or=50% stenosis in >or=2 major epicardial arteries. Multivessel disease was documented in 276 patients (44%), these patients comprising the study population. Clinical, angiographic and procedural variables were compared between those with and without CS. A logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the independent predictors of CS among patients with multivessel disease., Results: Among patients with multivessel disease, 45 (16%) had CS at admission. The independent predictors of CS in patients with multivessel disease were: STEMI anterior [OR 2.05; 95% CI 1.0 to 4.1; p=0.044], female gender [odds ratio (OR) 2.49; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.1 to 5.3; p=0.021], proximal culprit lesion [OR 3.8; 95% CI 1.7 to 8.5; p<0.001], and chronic occlusion of other coronary arteries [OR 4.48; 95% CI 2.1 to 9.1; p<0.001]., Conclusions: Among patients with STEMI and multivessel disease, CS is especially frequent in STEMI anterior, female gender, proximal culprit lesion, and chronic occlusion of other vessels.

Background: Patients with cardiac arrest have been excluded from most randomized trials on percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI)., Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate the outcome of patients undergoing primary PCI for acute myocardial infarction who suffered from cardiac arrest prior to the procedure, focusing the study on the influence of immediate paramedical-medical assistance on the outcome., Methods and Results: Sixty-three patients with ST-elevation AMI and previous cardiac arrest underwent primary PCI within 12 hours after symptom onset. Three groups of patients were defined: Group 1: Cardiac arrest before hospital admission, without immediate (< 1 minute) initiation of resuscitation maneuvers (n = 13); Group 2: Pre-hospital cardiac arrest with immediate initiation of resuscitation maneuvers (n = 14); Group 3: Cardiac arrest after hospital admission. The proportion of patients with ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation as documented initial rhythm was similar among the groups (77%, 79% and 83%, respectively), as well as the rate of angiographic success (92%, 93% and 86%, respectively). However, the incidence of cardiac events at 30 days was significantly higher in Group 1 than in Groups 2 or 3 (54%, 29% and 17%, respectively; p = 0.03), as well as the mortality rate at 30 days (46%, 21% and 18%, respectively; p = 0.06). Interestingly, the outcomes were not statistically different between Groups 2 and 3. In multivariate analysis, the independent predictors for mortality at 30 days for Group 1 were: multivessel disease, angiographic failure and cardiogenic shock., Conclusions: Combining immediate initiation of resuscitation maneuvers and primary PCI yields a very good clinical outcome in patients with AMI suffering from cardiac arrest.

Background: Among patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) referred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), those with multivessel disease have worse clinical outcomes. This study sought to elucidate the impact of a chronic occlusion in a noninfarct vessel among patients with multivessel disease undergoing PCI for AMI., Methods and Results: We studied 630 patients with AMI treated with PCI within 12 hours of symptom onset. Three groups of patients were defined: Group 1 (single-vessel disease; n = 345); Group 2 (multivessel disease with no chronic coronary occlusion in another vessel; n = 201); and Group 3 (chronic coronary occlusion in another vessel; n = 84). The probability of being free from events was lower in patients with multivessel disease than in Group 1 (84 +/- 2% vs. 92 +/- 1% at 30 days; 71 +/- 3% vs. 81 +/- 3% at 2 years; Log-Rank: p = 0.001; Breslow: p < 0.001 ), and in Group 3 than in Group 2 (76 +/- 5% vs. 87 +/- 2% at 30 days; 63 +/- 6% vs.75 +/- 4% at 2 years; Log-Rank: p = 0.014; Breslow: p = 0.008 ). Freedom from cardiac death was lower in patients with multivessel disease than in Group 1 (88 +/- 2% vs. 94 +/- 1% at 30 days; 84 +/- 2% vs. 91 +/- 2% at 2 years; Log-Rank: p = 0.003; Breslow: p = 0.002), and in Group 3 than in Group 2 (82 +/- 4% vs. 90 +/- 2% at 30 days; 77 +/- 5% vs. 88 +/- 3% at 2 years; Log-Rank and Breslow: p = 0.020). Among patients with multivessel disease, the presence of cardiogenic shock, left main disease and anterior location, but not the presence of a chronic occlusion in another vessel, were independent predictors of mortality., Conclusion: Among patients with AMI and multivessel disease, those with a chronic occlusion in a noninfarct-related vessel constitute a subgroup with very poor clinical outcomes.